Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
I would support https://github.com/apache/chainsaw being a set of standard go libraries much like commons is for java. Thoughts? -Rob > On Sep 26, 2023, at 6:08 PM, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > Ah :-) > > Cheers, > -Rob > >> On Sep 26, 2023, at 6:03 PM, Robert Middleton wrote: >> >> logging-chainsaw is not archived and contains the most up-to-date code. >> The old 'chainsaw' repository has been archived. >> >> -Robert Middleton >> >>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 5:57 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: >>> >>> Maybe we should un-archive it and run with it in a new direction? >>> >>> -Rob >>> On Sep 26, 2023, at 4:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier >>> wrote: Hi, Infra archived this repo for us: https://github.com/apache/chainsaw Kind regards, Christian On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:28 PM Christian Grobmeier > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 20:16, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> An svn mirror should be useless. Would you please do a sanity check? >>> Is the >>> last commit from repo in our git repo? >> >> Yes, the Git repo: Updated on Jul 19, 2023 1,134 commits >> SVN: Updated on Jul 8, 2022, 934 commits > > TY for checking Christian. > > Gary > >> >>> >>> TY, >>> Gary >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 1:50 PM Christian Grobmeier >>> wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 21:53, Robert Middleton wrote: > I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while >>> #2 is a > mirror of the gitbox repository. Looks like the SVN mirror is outdated. Can we safely remove it? If there are no objections, I will create a ticket with infra Christian > -Robert > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı >>> wrote: > >> Does anybody know the difference between these two >>> repositories[1][2] >> and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since >> 2014. >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw >> [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw >> >>> >>> >
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
Ah :-) Cheers, -Rob > On Sep 26, 2023, at 6:03 PM, Robert Middleton wrote: > > logging-chainsaw is not archived and contains the most up-to-date code. > The old 'chainsaw' repository has been archived. > > -Robert Middleton > > On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 5:57 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > >> Maybe we should un-archive it and run with it in a new direction? >> >> -Rob >> >>> On Sep 26, 2023, at 4:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Infra archived this repo for us: >>> https://github.com/apache/chainsaw >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Christian >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote: On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:28 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 20:16, Gary Gregory wrote: >> An svn mirror should be useless. Would you please do a sanity check? >> Is the >> last commit from repo in our git repo? > > Yes, the Git repo: Updated on Jul 19, 2023 1,134 commits > SVN: Updated on Jul 8, 2022, 934 commits TY for checking Christian. Gary > >> >> TY, >> Gary >> >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 1:50 PM Christian Grobmeier >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 21:53, Robert Middleton wrote: I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while >> #2 is a mirror of the gitbox repository. >>> >>> Looks like the SVN mirror is outdated. Can we safely remove it? >>> If there are no objections, I will create a ticket with infra >>> >>> Christian >>> -Robert On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı >> wrote: > Does anybody know the difference between these two >> repositories[1][2] > and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since > 2014. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw > [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw > >>> >> >>
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
logging-chainsaw is not archived and contains the most up-to-date code. The old 'chainsaw' repository has been archived. -Robert Middleton On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 5:57 PM Rob Tompkins wrote: > Maybe we should un-archive it and run with it in a new direction? > > -Rob > > > On Sep 26, 2023, at 4:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Infra archived this repo for us: > > https://github.com/apache/chainsaw > > > > Kind regards, > > Christian > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:28 PM Christian Grobmeier > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 20:16, Gary Gregory wrote: > An svn mirror should be useless. Would you please do a sanity check? > Is the > last commit from repo in our git repo? > >>> > >>> Yes, the Git repo: Updated on Jul 19, 2023 1,134 commits > >>> SVN: Updated on Jul 8, 2022, 934 commits > >> > >> TY for checking Christian. > >> > >> Gary > >> > >>> > > TY, > Gary > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 1:50 PM Christian Grobmeier > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 21:53, Robert Middleton wrote: > >> I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while > #2 is a > >> mirror of the gitbox repository. > > > > Looks like the SVN mirror is outdated. Can we safely remove it? > > If there are no objections, I will create a ticket with infra > > > > Christian > > > >> -Robert > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı > wrote: > >> > >>> Does anybody know the difference between these two > repositories[1][2] > >>> and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since > >>> 2014. > >>> > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw > >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw > >>> > > > >
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
Maybe we should un-archive it and run with it in a new direction? -Rob > On Sep 26, 2023, at 4:43 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > Hi, > > Infra archived this repo for us: > https://github.com/apache/chainsaw > > Kind regards, > Christian > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:28 PM Christian Grobmeier >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 20:16, Gary Gregory wrote: An svn mirror should be useless. Would you please do a sanity check? Is the last commit from repo in our git repo? >>> >>> Yes, the Git repo: Updated on Jul 19, 2023 1,134 commits >>> SVN: Updated on Jul 8, 2022, 934 commits >> >> TY for checking Christian. >> >> Gary >> >>> TY, Gary On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 1:50 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 21:53, Robert Middleton wrote: >> I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while #2 is a >> mirror of the gitbox repository. > > Looks like the SVN mirror is outdated. Can we safely remove it? > If there are no objections, I will create a ticket with infra > > Christian > >> -Robert >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: >> >>> Does anybody know the difference between these two repositories[1][2] >>> and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since >>> 2014. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw >>> >
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
Hi, Infra archived this repo for us: https://github.com/apache/chainsaw Kind regards, Christian On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:28 PM Christian Grobmeier > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 20:16, Gary Gregory wrote: >> > An svn mirror should be useless. Would you please do a sanity check? Is the >> > last commit from repo in our git repo? >> >> Yes, the Git repo: Updated on Jul 19, 2023 1,134 commits >> SVN: Updated on Jul 8, 2022, 934 commits > > TY for checking Christian. > > Gary > >> >> > >> > TY, >> > Gary >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 1:50 PM Christian Grobmeier >> > wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 21:53, Robert Middleton wrote: >> >> > I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( >> >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while #2 is a >> >> > mirror of the gitbox repository. >> >> >> >> Looks like the SVN mirror is outdated. Can we safely remove it? >> >> If there are no objections, I will create a ticket with infra >> >> >> >> Christian >> >> >> >> > -Robert >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Does anybody know the difference between these two repositories[1][2] >> >> >> and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since >> >> >> 2014. >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw >> >> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw >> >> >> >> >>
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 2:28 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 20:16, Gary Gregory wrote: > > An svn mirror should be useless. Would you please do a sanity check? Is the > > last commit from repo in our git repo? > > Yes, the Git repo: Updated on Jul 19, 2023 1,134 commits > SVN: Updated on Jul 8, 2022, 934 commits TY for checking Christian. Gary > > > > > TY, > > Gary > > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 1:50 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 21:53, Robert Middleton wrote: > >> > I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( > >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while #2 is a > >> > mirror of the gitbox repository. > >> > >> Looks like the SVN mirror is outdated. Can we safely remove it? > >> If there are no objections, I will create a ticket with infra > >> > >> Christian > >> > >> > -Robert > >> > > >> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > >> > > >> >> Does anybody know the difference between these two repositories[1][2] > >> >> and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since > >> >> 2014. > >> >> > >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw > >> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw > >> >> > >>
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
Any repos we own that don’t start with logging- are almost guaranteed to be SVN mirrors. I think we’ve migrated everything by now. > On Sep 21, 2023, at 1:00 PM, Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > Does anybody know the difference between these two repositories[1][2] > and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since > 2014. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw > [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, at 20:16, Gary Gregory wrote: > An svn mirror should be useless. Would you please do a sanity check? Is the > last commit from repo in our git repo? Yes, the Git repo: Updated on Jul 19, 2023 1,134 commits SVN: Updated on Jul 8, 2022, 934 commits > > TY, > Gary > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 1:50 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 21:53, Robert Middleton wrote: >> > I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( >> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while #2 is a >> > mirror of the gitbox repository. >> >> Looks like the SVN mirror is outdated. Can we safely remove it? >> If there are no objections, I will create a ticket with infra >> >> Christian >> >> > -Robert >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: >> > >> >> Does anybody know the difference between these two repositories[1][2] >> >> and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since >> >> 2014. >> >> >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw >> >> [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw >> >> >>
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
An svn mirror should be useless. Would you please do a sanity check? Is the last commit from repo in our git repo? TY, Gary On Fri, Sep 22, 2023, 1:50 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 21:53, Robert Middleton wrote: > > I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while #2 is a > > mirror of the gitbox repository. > > Looks like the SVN mirror is outdated. Can we safely remove it? > If there are no objections, I will create a ticket with infra > > Christian > > > -Robert > > > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > > > >> Does anybody know the difference between these two repositories[1][2] > >> and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since > >> 2014. > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw > >> >
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023, at 21:53, Robert Middleton wrote: > I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while #2 is a > mirror of the gitbox repository. Looks like the SVN mirror is outdated. Can we safely remove it? If there are no objections, I will create a ticket with infra Christian > -Robert > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > >> Does anybody know the difference between these two repositories[1][2] >> and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since >> 2014. >> >> [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw >> [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw >>
Re: `chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
I think #1 is a mirror of SVN( https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/chainsaw/trunk/), while #2 is a mirror of the gitbox repository. -Robert On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 1:59 PM Volkan Yazıcı wrote: > Does anybody know the difference between these two repositories[1][2] > and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since > 2014. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw > [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw >
`chainsaw` vs `logging-chainsaw`
Does anybody know the difference between these two repositories[1][2] and why the mirroring does not work? [1] hasn't been updated since 2014. [1] https://github.com/apache/chainsaw [2] https://github.com/apache/logging-chainsaw
