[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10177) Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16061237#comment-16061237 ] ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10177: Commit c20d3aff9474be338ccf9fdb138f467435d06f09 in lucene-solr's branch refs/heads/master from Chris Hostetter [ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=c20d3af ] SOLR-10177: replace adhoc points randomization with new standard introduced by SOLR-10864 > Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas > -- > > Key: SOLR-10177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Test > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) >Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya >Assignee: Hoss Man > Attachments: SOLR-10177.patch > > > schema-inplace-updates.xml use per fieldType point fields randomization, > whereas other some schemas use per-field. However, the variable name is > similar and should be revisited and standardized across our tests. > Discussions here > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?focusedCommentId=15875108=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15875108. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10177) Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16049377#comment-16049377
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10177:
-
I actually think we can eliminate the randomized {{}} usage completely and focus solely on randomzing the {{}} approach (which would also simplify/reduce the
number of fieldTypes we need to add to all schemas) ... see SOLR-10864 for
details.
Assuming SOLR-10864 / SOLR-10807 moves forward, i'll fold SOLR-10177 into those
and remove the existing "type name" randomization.
> Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Test
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
>Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>
> schema-inplace-updates.xml use per fieldType point fields randomization,
> whereas other some schemas use per-field. However, the variable name is
> similar and should be revisited and standardized across our tests.
> Discussions here
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?focusedCommentId=15875108=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15875108.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10177) Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15883703#comment-15883703 ] Tomás Fernández Löbbe commented on SOLR-10177: -- bq. I think we should rename these two as: (a) "solr.tests.floatFieldType" as pfloat or float, when used on a per field basis, or (b) "solr.tests.floatClassName" as FloatPointField, when used in a fieldType definition. +1. I originally was planning on using those those system properties to define the full class of the field type to use, but later I realized that was not possible because the different types would have different attributes in the schema definition. > Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas > -- > > Key: SOLR-10177 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Test > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) >Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya > > schema-inplace-updates.xml use per fieldType point fields randomization, > whereas other some schemas use per-field. However, the variable name is > similar and should be revisited and standardized across our tests. > Discussions here > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?focusedCommentId=15875108=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15875108. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-10177) Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15875120#comment-15875120
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-10177:
-
The crux of my suggestion was:
{quote}
I think we should rename these two as: (a) "solr.tests.floatFieldType" as
pfloat or float, when used on a per field basis, or (b)
"solr.tests.floatClassName" as FloatPointField, when used in a fieldType
definition.
{quote}
> Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas
> --
>
> Key: SOLR-10177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Test
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
>Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>
> schema-inplace-updates.xml use per fieldType point fields randomization,
> whereas other some schemas use per-field. However, the variable name is
> similar and should be revisited and standardized across our tests.
> Discussions here
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?focusedCommentId=15875108=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15875108.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
