Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
I would like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6527 in 5.2.1 too. It is quite a bad performance bug if you use a filtering TermQuery as it will load norms for nothing. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: I can volunteer as RM unless someone else wants to. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote: +1 for bug fix releases. Though I'd say we can wait for a couple of days and give some time to others to fix other bugs that they'd want to get into 5.2.1, if there are any. P.S.: Who's the RM? :-) On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Anshum Gupta -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
I've completed work on the cloud tab for the AngularJS UI. I'm now making final checks and preparing a patch that I hope someone will commit for me :-) Thanks! Upayavira On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: Go ahead Adrien. I'll cut the RC when you're done. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6527 in 5.2.1 too. It is quite a bad performance bug if you use a filtering TermQuery as it will load norms for nothing. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: I can volunteer as RM unless someone else wants to. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote: +1 for bug fix releases. Though I'd say we can wait for a couple of days and give some time to others to fix other bugs that they'd want to get into 5.2.1, if there are any. P.S.: Who's the RM? :-) On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn --- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Anshum Gupta -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
Go ahead Adrien. I'll cut the RC when you're done. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6527 in 5.2.1 too. It is quite a bad performance bug if you use a filtering TermQuery as it will load norms for nothing. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: I can volunteer as RM unless someone else wants to. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote: +1 for bug fix releases. Though I'd say we can wait for a couple of days and give some time to others to fix other bugs that they'd want to get into 5.2.1, if there are any. P.S.: Who's the RM? :-) On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Anshum Gupta -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. -- Adrien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
Yeah, I’ll port that too. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: There may be a prerequisite ticket fix that needs pulling up too? r1683532 | dsmiley | 2015-06-04 08:32:45 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2015) | 1 line LUCENE-6520: Geo3D GeoPath.done() would throw an NPE if adjacent path segments w ere co-linear Karl On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:30 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: LUCENE-6535 is another one. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
LUCENE-6535 is another one. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
There may be a prerequisite ticket fix that needs pulling up too? r1683532 | dsmiley | 2015-06-04 08:32:45 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2015) | 1 line LUCENE-6520: Geo3D GeoPath.done() would throw an NPE if adjacent path segments w ere co-linear Karl On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:30 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: LUCENE-6535 is another one. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
As mention in the JIRA ticket; this won’t be back-ported as it only applies to the WGS84 feature added in 5.3. Sorry for any confusion. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:42 PM david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I’ll port that too. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: There may be a prerequisite ticket fix that needs pulling up too? r1683532 | dsmiley | 2015-06-04 08:32:45 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2015) | 1 line LUCENE-6520: Geo3D GeoPath.done() would throw an NPE if adjacent path segments w ere co-linear Karl On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:30 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: LUCENE-6535 is another one. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
I’m +1 to this. We can consider changing our mind once 5.3 is nocking on the door if there are serious problems. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:36 PM Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: Upayavira: I'm a little reluctant to try to port the simpler patch to 5.2.1 as this is all new functionality. I can be argued into it though. It seems that the goal here is to get mileage out of the Angular JS port before making it the default. What do you (and others) think about changing 5.3 to use the angular JS by default for the admin UI? That'll drive lots of usage and help us solidify it for official release without trying to shoehorn a patch into 5.2.1 that's not critical to normal Solr/Lucene functioning. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I’ll port that too. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: There may be a prerequisite ticket fix that needs pulling up too? r1683532 | dsmiley | 2015-06-04 08:32:45 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2015) | 1 line LUCENE-6520: Geo3D GeoPath.done() would throw an NPE if adjacent path segments w ere co-linear Karl On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:30 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: LUCENE-6535 is another one. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
I'd say, let's get this release out - I'm happy with either patch getting in. Then, let's see the flow of bug reports we get. That'll help us understand how stable (or otherwise) it is, and thus whether we should be shooting for 5.3 or 5.4. Upayavira On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, at 07:07 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: Upayavira: I'm a little reluctant to try to port the simpler patch to 5.2.1 as this is all new functionality. I can be argued into it though. It seems that the goal here is to get mileage out of the Angular JS port before making it the default. What do you (and others) think about changing 5.3 to use the angular JS by default for the admin UI? That'll drive lots of usage and help us solidify it for official release without trying to shoehorn a patch into 5.2.1 that's not critical to normal Solr/Lucene functioning. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I’ll port that too. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: There may be a prerequisite ticket fix that needs pulling up too? r1683532 | dsmiley | 2015-06-04 08:32:45 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2015) | 1 line LUCENE-6520: Geo3D GeoPath.done() would throw an NPE if adjacent path segments w ere co-linear Karl On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:30 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: LUCENE-6535 is another one. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
Upayavira: I'm a little reluctant to try to port the simpler patch to 5.2.1 as this is all new functionality. I can be argued into it though. It seems that the goal here is to get mileage out of the Angular JS port before making it the default. What do you (and others) think about changing 5.3 to use the angular JS by default for the admin UI? That'll drive lots of usage and help us solidify it for official release without trying to shoehorn a patch into 5.2.1 that's not critical to normal Solr/Lucene functioning. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I’ll port that too. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: There may be a prerequisite ticket fix that needs pulling up too? r1683532 | dsmiley | 2015-06-04 08:32:45 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2015) | 1 line LUCENE-6520: Geo3D GeoPath.done() would throw an NPE if adjacent path segments w ere co-linear Karl On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:30 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: LUCENE-6535 is another one. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
A user found a nasty DefaultSolrHighlighter performance bug with an easy fix — https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7655 I’m running tests now. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:48 PM david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: I’m +1 to this. We can consider changing our mind once 5.3 is nocking on the door if there are serious problems. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:36 PM Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com wrote: Upayavira: I'm a little reluctant to try to port the simpler patch to 5.2.1 as this is all new functionality. I can be argued into it though. It seems that the goal here is to get mileage out of the Angular JS port before making it the default. What do you (and others) think about changing 5.3 to use the angular JS by default for the admin UI? That'll drive lots of usage and help us solidify it for official release without trying to shoehorn a patch into 5.2.1 that's not critical to normal Solr/Lucene functioning. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I’ll port that too. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: There may be a prerequisite ticket fix that needs pulling up too? r1683532 | dsmiley | 2015-06-04 08:32:45 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2015) | 1 line LUCENE-6520: Geo3D GeoPath.done() would throw an NPE if adjacent path segments w ere co-linear Karl On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:30 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: LUCENE-6535 is another one. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 On 09-Jun-2015 6:10 pm, Erik Hatcher erik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote: And here’s a fix worth getting into 5.2.1 while we’re at it as well: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7652 — Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect http://www.lucidworks.com On Jun 8, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote: +1 for bug fix releases. Though I'd say we can wait for a couple of days and give some time to others to fix other bugs that they'd want to get into 5.2.1, if there are any. P.S.: Who's the RM? :-) On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Anshum Gupta
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7638 Whilst I'd love to see the paging functionality in the cloud tab, I'd suggest we leave that out of a point release, and just apply the SOLR-7638- simple.patch file which makes three small, simple changes to get the angular cloud tab back functioning. Upayavira On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, at 12:20 PM, Upayavira wrote: I've completed work on the cloud tab for the AngularJS UI. I'm now making final checks and preparing a patch that I hope someone will commit for me :-) Thanks! Upayavira On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: Go ahead Adrien. I'll cut the RC when you're done. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Adrien Grand jpou...@gmail.com wrote: I would like to get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6527 in 5.2.1 too. It is quite a bad performance bug if you use a filtering TermQuery as it will load norms for nothing. On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:39 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: I can volunteer as RM unless someone else wants to. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote: +1 for bug fix releases. Though I'd say we can wait for a couple of days and give some time to others to fix other bugs that they'd want to get into 5.2.1, if there are any. P.S.: Who's the RM? :-) On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Anshum Gupta -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. -- Adrien --- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
And here’s a fix worth getting into 5.2.1 while we’re at it as well: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7652 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7652 — Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect http://www.lucidworks.com http://www.lucidworks.com/ On Jun 8, 2015, at 3:15 PM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote: +1 for bug fix releases. Though I'd say we can wait for a couple of days and give some time to others to fix other bugs that they'd want to get into 5.2.1, if there are any. P.S.: Who's the RM? :-) On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org mailto:apa...@elyograg.org wrote: I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org mailto:dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org mailto:dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Anshum Gupta
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
I’ve gotten the two fixes (new admin Cloud UI and example/files update-script.js) into 5_2 branch. Bring on the 5.2.1 RC! — Erik Hatcher, Senior Solutions Architect http://www.lucidworks.com http://www.lucidworks.com/ On Jun 9, 2015, at 2:42 PM, Upayavira u...@odoko.co.uk wrote: I'd say, let's get this release out - I'm happy with either patch getting in. Then, let's see the flow of bug reports we get. That'll help us understand how stable (or otherwise) it is, and thus whether we should be shooting for 5.3 or 5.4. Upayavira On Tue, Jun 9, 2015, at 07:07 PM, Erick Erickson wrote: Upayavira: I'm a little reluctant to try to port the simpler patch to 5.2.1 as this is all new functionality. I can be argued into it though. It seems that the goal here is to get mileage out of the Angular JS port before making it the default. What do you (and others) think about changing 5.3 to use the angular JS by default for the admin UI? That'll drive lots of usage and help us solidify it for official release without trying to shoehorn a patch into 5.2.1 that's not critical to normal Solr/Lucene functioning. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 9:42 AM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, I’ll port that too. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:36 PM Karl Wright daddy...@gmail.com wrote: There may be a prerequisite ticket fix that needs pulling up too? r1683532 | dsmiley | 2015-06-04 08:32:45 -0400 (Thu, 04 Jun 2015) | 1 line LUCENE-6520: Geo3D GeoPath.done() would throw an NPE if adjacent path segments w ere co-linear Karl On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:30 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote: LUCENE-6535 is another one. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 10:57 AM Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Steve! On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 7:25 PM, Steve Rowe sar...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
On Jun 9, 2015, at 8:57 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like there are several small fixes that need to be added. I'll cut an RC tomorrow morning India time so that we have enough time to back port these items. I'll also setup a local Jenkins build for 5.2 I’ll re-enable the ASF Jenkins 5.2 jobs now. Steve www.lucidworks.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
I would also like to backport https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6523 Mike McCandless http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote: Hi, If we do a bugfix relaese I would like to get the LUCENE-6482 (classloading deadlock) in. This is not a new bug, but it is very nasty and affects Elasticsearch. Solr is no affected because the Codec API is initialized in single-threaded mode. It is not high priority, but this one is easy to backport and does not affect any public APIs. There is a workaround available (executing Codecs.availableCodecs() on startup of your server), but this is really nasty because your JVM just hangs. You don't even see any locked/blocked threads, just threads lingering before a method call - without a lock. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 7:06 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1? I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
If there was enough time, I'd like to fix the Cloud tab in the angular admin UI, which I discovered is broken after the release went out. Upayavira On Mon, Jun 8, 2015, at 06:52 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote: I am ready to commit the backport of the classloader deadlock to 5.2.1 branch Just running tests! Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 7:34 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1? Hi, If we do a bugfix relaese I would like to get the LUCENE-6482 (classloading deadlock) in. This is not a new bug, but it is very nasty and affects Elasticsearch. Solr is no affected because the Codec API is initialized in single- threaded mode. It is not high priority, but this one is easy to backport and does not affect any public APIs. There is a workaround available (executing Codecs.availableCodecs() on startup of your server), but this is really nasty because your JVM just hangs. You don't even see any locked/blocked threads, just threads lingering before a method call - without a lock. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 7:06 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1? I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
+1 for bug fix releases. Though I'd say we can wait for a couple of days and give some time to others to fix other bugs that they'd want to get into 5.2.1, if there are any. P.S.: Who's the RM? :-) On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Anshum Gupta
RE: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
Hi, If we do a bugfix relaese I would like to get the LUCENE-6482 (classloading deadlock) in. This is not a new bug, but it is very nasty and affects Elasticsearch. Solr is no affected because the Codec API is initialized in single-threaded mode. It is not high priority, but this one is easy to backport and does not affect any public APIs. There is a workaround available (executing Codecs.availableCodecs() on startup of your server), but this is really nasty because your JVM just hangs. You don't even see any locked/blocked threads, just threads lingering before a method call - without a lock. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 7:06 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1? I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
RE: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
I am ready to commit the backport of the classloader deadlock to 5.2.1 branch Just running tests! Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 7:34 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1? Hi, If we do a bugfix relaese I would like to get the LUCENE-6482 (classloading deadlock) in. This is not a new bug, but it is very nasty and affects Elasticsearch. Solr is no affected because the Codec API is initialized in single- threaded mode. It is not high priority, but this one is easy to backport and does not affect any public APIs. There is a workaround available (executing Codecs.availableCodecs() on startup of your server), but this is really nasty because your JVM just hangs. You don't even see any locked/blocked threads, just threads lingering before a method call - without a lock. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de -Original Message- From: Shawn Heisey [mailto:apa...@elyograg.org] Sent: Monday, June 08, 2015 7:06 PM To: dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1? I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
I can volunteer as RM unless someone else wants to. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Anshum Gupta ans...@anshumgupta.net wrote: +1 for bug fix releases. Though I'd say we can wait for a couple of days and give some time to others to fix other bugs that they'd want to get into 5.2.1, if there are any. P.S.: Who's the RM? :-) On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org -- Anshum Gupta -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
Re: Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
+1 for 5.2.1. Steve www.lucidworks.com On Jun 8, 2015, at 1:06 PM, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote: I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Looks like I broke Solr 5.2.0 - do we need a 5.2.1?
I broke it. SOLR-7588 fixes it. It hasn't been committed yet. The dataimport section of the admin UI doesn't work because I apparently put coffeescript into the admin UI instead of javascript. Is this a bad enough problem to warrant a bugfix release? Thanks, Shawn - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
