Re: [REINDEX] Note: re-indexing required !

2011-02-07 Thread Earwin Burrfoot
Lucene maintains compatibility with earlier stable release index
versions, and to some extent transparently upgrades them.
But there is no guaranteed compatibility between different
in-development indexes.

E.g. 3.2 reads 3.1 indexes and upgrades them, but 3.2-dev-snapshot-10
(while happily handling 3.1) may fail reading 3.2-dev-snapshot-8
index, as they have the same version tag, yet different formats.

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 19:18, Earl Hood e...@earlhood.com wrote:
 On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
 Under LUCENE-2720 the index format of both trunk and 3x has changed. You
 should re-index any indexes created with either of these code streams.

 Does the 3x refer to the 3.x development branch?

 I.e. For those of using the stable 3.x release of Lucene, will
 a future 3.x release require rebuilding indexes?

 --ewh

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org





-- 
Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (ear...@gmail.com)
Phone: +7 (495) 683-567-4
ICQ: 104465785

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org



Re: [REINDEX] Note: re-indexing required !

2011-01-23 Thread Earl Hood
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
 Under LUCENE-2720 the index format of both trunk and 3x has changed. You
 should re-index any indexes created with either of these code streams.

Does the 3x refer to the 3.x development branch?

I.e. For those of using the stable 3.x release of Lucene, will
a future 3.x release require rebuilding indexes?

--ewh

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org