Re: Logging in plugins right now
On 2012-11-20 04:13, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >>> >>> On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: >>> Do we have, right now, either: 1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or >>> >>> Do you mean commons-logging, JUL, or both? There are ways to adapt both to >>> SLF4J. >> >> The former, but it doesn't matter. >> >> If I add a dependency, in a plugin, that uses commons-logging, I want >> to map the log messages from that dependency to the mojo log, so that >> they look right even with Maven 3.0.x. > > If memory serves, commons-logging will look for Log4j, then JUL, and if > neither of those are present then a NoOp implementation is selected. So in > our case, most people being 1.4+, the JDK implementation will be chosen and > the default for JUL is to output to the console so they will come out with > the rest of the output but the formatting will be slightly different. > Probably nothing horrible. It's very easy for an application to explicitly use the simplelog implementation in commons-logging. The formatting for it can be tweaked to look like Maven's normal console logging. No added dependency is needed, just a couple of properties files. I can help to set this up. >> I appreciate that as of 3.1 I >> can just use the usual jcl-over-slf4j (or jul or whatever) and the >> messages will end up in the right-ish place, though not associated >> with the mojo. I was hoping for >> > > No mojo specific logging is present right now. It's just all using SLF4J but > no real hierarchy, or markers have been established. So for 3.1.0 and before > the output is going to look more or less the same. > >>plugin code calls (e.g.) CXF code calls SLF4J calls >> something-we-lack calls mojo log calls SLF4J calls SLF4J-simple (in >> 3.1) >> >> and >> >> >> plugin code calls (e.g.) CXF code calls SLF4J calls >> something-we-lack calls mojo log calls whatever we have today (in 2.x >> or 3.0.x) >> > > In both cases now it's just all going to come out on the console. > >> >> >>> 2) A way of mapping slf4j to the mojo log? >>> >>> Mojo.getLog() feeds into SLF4J with the code on trunk. >>> ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jason >>> >>> -- >>> Jason van Zyl >>> Founder & CTO, Sonatype >>> Founder, Apache Maven >>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >>> - >>> >>> In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational >>> and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. >>> >>> -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > -- > Jason van Zyl > Founder & CTO, Sonatype > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > - > > Three people can keep a secret provided two of them are dead. > > -- Benjamin Franklin > > > > > > -- Dennis Lundberg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Logging in plugins right now
On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:44 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: >> >> On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: >> >>> Do we have, right now, either: >>> >>> 1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or >>> >> >> Do you mean commons-logging, JUL, or both? There are ways to adapt both to >> SLF4J. > > The former, but it doesn't matter. > > If I add a dependency, in a plugin, that uses commons-logging, I want > to map the log messages from that dependency to the mojo log, so that > they look right even with Maven 3.0.x. If memory serves, commons-logging will look for Log4j, then JUL, and if neither of those are present then a NoOp implementation is selected. So in our case, most people being 1.4+, the JDK implementation will be chosen and the default for JUL is to output to the console so they will come out with the rest of the output but the formatting will be slightly different. Probably nothing horrible. > I appreciate that as of 3.1 I > can just use the usual jcl-over-slf4j (or jul or whatever) and the > messages will end up in the right-ish place, though not associated > with the mojo. I was hoping for > No mojo specific logging is present right now. It's just all using SLF4J but no real hierarchy, or markers have been established. So for 3.1.0 and before the output is going to look more or less the same. >plugin code calls (e.g.) CXF code calls SLF4J calls > something-we-lack calls mojo log calls SLF4J calls SLF4J-simple (in > 3.1) > > and > > > plugin code calls (e.g.) CXF code calls SLF4J calls > something-we-lack calls mojo log calls whatever we have today (in 2.x > or 3.0.x) > In both cases now it's just all going to come out on the console. > > >> >>> 2) A way of mapping slf4j to the mojo log? >>> >> >> Mojo.getLog() feeds into SLF4J with the code on trunk. >> >>> ? >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >>> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jason >> >> -- >> Jason van Zyl >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype >> Founder, Apache Maven >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl >> - >> >> In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational >> and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. >> >> -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society >> >> >> >> >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder & CTO, Sonatype Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl - Three people can keep a secret provided two of them are dead. -- Benjamin Franklin
Re: Logging in plugins right now
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Jason van Zyl wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > >> Do we have, right now, either: >> >> 1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or >> > > Do you mean commons-logging, JUL, or both? There are ways to adapt both to > SLF4J. The former, but it doesn't matter. If I add a dependency, in a plugin, that uses commons-logging, I want to map the log messages from that dependency to the mojo log, so that they look right even with Maven 3.0.x. I appreciate that as of 3.1 I can just use the usual jcl-over-slf4j (or jul or whatever) and the messages will end up in the right-ish place, though not associated with the mojo. I was hoping for plugin code calls (e.g.) CXF code calls SLF4J calls something-we-lack calls mojo log calls SLF4J calls SLF4J-simple (in 3.1) and plugin code calls (e.g.) CXF code calls SLF4J calls something-we-lack calls mojo log calls whatever we have today (in 2.x or 3.0.x) > >> 2) A way of mapping slf4j to the mojo log? >> > > Mojo.getLog() feeds into SLF4J with the code on trunk. > >> ? >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org >> > > Thanks, > > Jason > > -- > Jason van Zyl > Founder & CTO, Sonatype > Founder, Apache Maven > http://twitter.com/jvanzyl > - > > In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational > and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. > > -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
Re: Logging in plugins right now
On Nov 19, 2012, at 8:29 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Do we have, right now, either: > > 1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or > Do you mean commons-logging, JUL, or both? There are ways to adapt both to SLF4J. > 2) A way of mapping slf4j to the mojo log? > Mojo.getLog() feeds into SLF4J with the code on trunk. > ? > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org > Thanks, Jason -- Jason van Zyl Founder & CTO, Sonatype Founder, Apache Maven http://twitter.com/jvanzyl - In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society
Logging in plugins right now
Do we have, right now, either: 1) A way of mapping java-commons-logging to the mojo log API, or 2) A way of mapping slf4j to the mojo log? ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
