Re: State of Milagro

[Giorgio Zoppi]

Hello,
in merit to the status, i would like to know information about the milagro
server, just clone this.
It might be an area of my personal interest. Some tech question.
Why did you choose the lovely Python? Can be this done in cpp/java?
Second question..
Any docs on RPS? which is the roadmap for the milagro server ? Do you have
any server issues to solve?
BR,
Giiorgio


2017-10-29 11:34 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament :

> Hi All,
>
> Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
> questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
>
> The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions raised by
> Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your report
> explicitly.  You cannot add their sign off.
>
> John
>

Re: State of Milagro

[Nikolai Stoilov]

I added the report to the wiki.

Thanks,

Nikolai

On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:25 AM Nikolai Stoilov 
wrote:

> I'll submit a report later today.
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 1:20 AM John D. Ament 
> wrote:
>
>> Ok, thanks for clarifying those items.
>>
>> The reason I was originally stopping by was due to lack of report.  Any
>> update on a report?
>>
>> John
>>
>> On 2017-11-08 03:19, Simeon Aladjem  wrote:
>> > The issue was that newest crypto code was initially published under
>> https://github.com/milagro-crypto/milagro-crypto-c, but it will be moved
>> to https://github.com/apache.
>> >
>> > Simeon
>> >
>> > On 8/11/17, 04:47, "John D. Ament"  wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2017-11-07 05:18, Simeon Aladjem 
>> wrote:
>> > > No, exactly the opposite!
>> > > The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the
>> project can continue as it should.
>> > > Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.
>> >
>> > Which issue are you referring to?
>> >
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Simeon Aladjem
>> > >
>> > > On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi" 
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello everybody,
>> > > this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
>> > > BR,
>> > > Giorgio
>> > >
>> > > <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
>> >
>> > > Libre
>> > > de virus. www.avast.com
>> > > <
>> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
>> >
>> > > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>> > >
>> > > 2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem <
>> simeon.alad...@miracl.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > Hello,
>> > > >
>> > > > To the best of my understanding, the current problem with
>> the project is
>> > > > the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a
>> different GitHub
>> > > > organization.
>> > > > I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the
>> intention to make this
>> > > > move was suspended.
>> > > >
>> > > > Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto
>> code, which
>> > > > doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a
>> missive change
>> > > > from the current one.
>> > > > We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the
>> project
>> > > > code-base and repositories.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best,
>> > > > Simeon Aladjem
>> > > > MIRACL
>> > > >
>> > > > On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament" <
>> johndam...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
>> > > >
>> > > > Where do you want this project to go?  I know from an
>> IPMC standpoint,
>> > > > I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
>> > > >
>> > > > John
>> > > >
>> > > > On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto" <
>> yamamoto...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I am wondering why this project does not go.  We have
>> a set of MFA
>> > > > server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually
>> work fine.  We
>> > > > have been working for the code and are willing to donate
>> the code.   It
>> > > > sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I think we should start from releasing the library
>> part and fix the
>> > > > API for the library.
>> > > > > What is the blocker?  Should we restart the project?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Regards,
>> > > > > Go Yamamoto
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
>> > > > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
>> > > > > To: d...@milagro.apache.org
>> > > > > Subject: State of Milagro
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Hi All,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was
>> removed due to
>> > > > questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering
>> the questions
>> > > > raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign
>> off on your
>> > > > report explicitly.  You cannot add their sign off.
>> > > 

Re: State of Milagro

[Simeon Aladjem]

The issue was that newest crypto code was initially published under 
https://github.com/milagro-crypto/milagro-crypto-c, but it will be moved to 
https://github.com/apache.

Simeon

On 8/11/17, 04:47, "John D. Ament"  wrote:



On 2017-11-07 05:18, Simeon Aladjem  wrote: 
> No, exactly the opposite!
> The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the project 
can continue as it should.
> Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.

Which issue are you referring to?

> 
> Thanks,
> Simeon Aladjem
> 
> On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi"  wrote:
> 
> Hello everybody,
> this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
> BR,
> Giorgio
> 
> 

> Libre
> de virus. www.avast.com
> 

> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> 
> 2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem :
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the 
project is
> > the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different 
GitHub
> > organization.
> > I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to 
make this
> > move was suspended.
> >
> > Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, 
which
> > doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive 
change
> > from the current one.
> > We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project
> > code-base and repositories.
> >
> > Best,
> > Simeon Aladjem
> > MIRACL
> >
> > On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament"  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
> >
> > Where do you want this project to go?  I know from an IPMC 
standpoint,
> > I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto"  
wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am wondering why this project does not go.  We have a set 
of MFA
> > server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work 
fine.  We
> > have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code.  
 It
> > sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> > >
> > > I think we should start from releasing the library part and 
fix the
> > API for the library.
> > > What is the blocker?  Should we restart the project?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Go Yamamoto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > > To: d...@milagro.apache.org
> > > Subject: State of Milagro
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed 
due to
> > questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> > >
> > > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the 
questions
> > raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on 
your
> > report explicitly.  You cannot add their sign off.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 

Re: State of Milagro

[John D. Ament]

On 2017-11-07 05:18, Simeon Aladjem  wrote: 
> No, exactly the opposite!
> The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the project can 
> continue as it should.
> Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.

Which issue are you referring to?

> 
> Thanks,
> Simeon Aladjem
> 
> On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi"  wrote:
> 
> Hello everybody,
> this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
> BR,
> Giorgio
> 
> 
> 
> Libre
> de virus. www.avast.com
> 
> 
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> 
> 2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem :
> 
> > Hello,
> >
> > To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is
> > the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub
> > organization.
> > I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make 
> this
> > move was suspended.
> >
> > Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which
> > doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change
> > from the current one.
> > We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project
> > code-base and repositories.
> >
> > Best,
> > Simeon Aladjem
> > MIRACL
> >
> > On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament"  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
> >
> > Where do you want this project to go?  I know from an IPMC 
> standpoint,
> > I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
> >
> > John
> >
> > On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto"  
> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am wondering why this project does not go.  We have a set of MFA
> > server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine.  We
> > have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code.   It
> > sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> > >
> > > I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix 
> the
> > API for the library.
> > > What is the blocker?  Should we restart the project?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Go Yamamoto
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
> > > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > > To: d...@milagro.apache.org
> > > Subject: State of Milagro
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due 
> to
> > questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> > >
> > > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions
> > raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your
> > report explicitly.  You cannot add their sign off.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> 
> 

Re: State of Milagro

[Simeon Aladjem]

No, exactly the opposite!
The issue that shacked the ground is not present anymore, so the project can 
continue as it should.
Any proposed change will be raised for a vote.

Thanks,
Simeon Aladjem

On 7/11/17, 12:10, "Giorgio Zoppi"  wrote:

Hello everybody,
this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
BR,
Giorgio



Libre
de virus. www.avast.com


<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem :

> Hello,
>
> To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is
> the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub
> organization.
> I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this
> move was suspended.
>
> Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which
> doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change
> from the current one.
> We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project
> code-base and repositories.
>
> Best,
> Simeon Aladjem
> MIRACL
>
> On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
>
> Where do you want this project to go?  I know from an IPMC standpoint,
> I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
>
> John
>
> On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto"  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wondering why this project does not go.  We have a set of MFA
> server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine.  We
> have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code.   It
> sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> >
> > I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the
> API for the library.
> > What is the blocker?  Should we restart the project?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Go Yamamoto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > To: d...@milagro.apache.org
> > Subject: State of Milagro
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
> questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> >
> > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions
> raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your
> report explicitly.  You cannot add their sign off.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Re: State of Milagro

[Giorgio Zoppi]

Hello everybody,
this means that it is not an apache.org project anymore?
BR,
Giorgio


Libre
de virus. www.avast.com

<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

2017-11-07 9:42 GMT+01:00 Simeon Aladjem :

> Hello,
>
> To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is
> the hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub
> organization.
> I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this
> move was suspended.
>
> Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which
> doesn't fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change
> from the current one.
> We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project
> code-base and repositories.
>
> Best,
> Simeon Aladjem
> MIRACL
>
> On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament"  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.
>
> Where do you want this project to go?  I know from an IPMC standpoint,
> I'm concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.
>
> John
>
> On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto"  wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am wondering why this project does not go.  We have a set of MFA
> server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine.  We
> have been working for the code and are willing to donate the code.   It
> sounds like a quite unreasonable story.
> >
> > I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the
> API for the library.
> > What is the blocker?  Should we restart the project?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Go Yamamoto
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> > To: d...@milagro.apache.org
> > Subject: State of Milagro
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to
> questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> >
> > The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions
> raised by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your
> report explicitly.  You cannot add their sign off.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> >
>
>

Re: State of Milagro

[Simeon Aladjem]

Hello,

To the best of my understanding, the current problem with the project is the 
hinted move of the milagro-crypto repository to a different GitHub organization.
I think that won't be a problem anymore, since the intention to make this move 
was suspended.

Together with that, we do want to contribute a new crypto code, which doesn't 
fit into the current repository, as it presents a missive change from the 
current one.
We intend to propose in the near future few changes in the project code-base 
and repositories.

Best,
Simeon Aladjem
MIRACL

On 6/11/17, 15:07, "John D. Ament"  wrote:

Hi,

Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.

Where do you want this project to go?  I know from an IPMC standpoint, I'm 
concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.

John

On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto"  wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> I am wondering why this project does not go.  We have a set of MFA 
server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine.  We have 
been working for the code and are willing to donate the code.   It sounds like 
a quite unreasonable story.
> 
> I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the API 
for the library.  
> What is the blocker?  Should we restart the project?
> 
> Regards,
> Go Yamamoto
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> To: d...@milagro.apache.org
> Subject: State of Milagro
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to 
questions being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> 
> The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions raised 
by Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your report 
explicitly.  You cannot add their sign off.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 

Re: RE: State of Milagro

[John D. Ament]

Hi,

Sorry, I don't fully understand your response.

Where do you want this project to go?  I know from an IPMC standpoint, I'm 
concerned that you moved development away from the ASF.

John

On 2017-10-29 08:29, "Go Yamamoto"  wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> I am wondering why this project does not go.  We have a set of MFA 
> server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine.  We have 
> been working for the code and are willing to donate the code.   It sounds 
> like a quite unreasonable story.
> 
> I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the API for 
> the library.  
> What is the blocker?  Should we restart the project?
> 
> Regards,
> Go Yamamoto
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
> To: d...@milagro.apache.org
> Subject: State of Milagro
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to questions 
> being raised and lack of mentor sign off.
> 
> The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions raised by 
> Dave Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your report 
> explicitly.  You cannot add their sign off.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> 

RE: State of Milagro

[Go Yamamoto]

Hi,

I am wondering why this project does not go.  We have a set of MFA 
server/client and an ID-based crypt library that actually work fine.  We have 
been working for the code and are willing to donate the code.   It sounds like 
a quite unreasonable story.

I think we should start from releasing the library part and fix the API for the 
library.  
What is the blocker?  Should we restart the project?

Regards,
Go Yamamoto






-Original Message-
From: John D. Ament [mailto:johndam...@apache.org] 
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2017 7:35 PM
To: d...@milagro.apache.org
Subject: State of Milagro

Hi All,

Last month, as noted in email, your board report was removed due to questions 
being raised and lack of mentor sign off.

The IPMC looks for a response from you considering the questions raised by Dave 
Fisher, in addition your mentors must sign off on your report explicitly.  You 
cannot add their sign off.

John