Re: Configuring a custom UserManager
2010/11/11 John Hartnup john.hart...@gmail.com: OK, I've explained the issue. I was looking at the 1.1.0 SNAPSHOT source, while running the stable 1.0.5 code. 1.0.5 does not use the dynamically configured CommandFactory for SITE commands. Is there some sort of guesstimate as to when 1.1.0 will become a stable release? Maybe Niklas can give you an estimate, but there have been few changes for 1.1.x ... On 11 November 2010 14:27, John Hartnup john.hart...@gmail.com wrote: Hi again, On a similar note, I'm having trouble getting a custom SITE command in Apache ftpserver to work. commands command name=SITE_PARM spring:bean class=org.john.ftps.command.SITE_PARM/ /command /commands I can see (via logging) that the SITE_PARM object is constructed, but when I send the site parm ftp command, I get a 502 error, suggesting that the CommandFactory has not returned the object. Any suggestions? (By the way, is this the right mailing list to ask such questions?) I think the users mailing list was a more appropriate choice in your case. Note that FTPServer 'dev' list is the same as MINA developers list so I recommend that you use the prefix [FTPSERVER] or similar when you want to ask anything specific to FTPServer. Thanks, John -- There is no way to peace; peace is the way -- There is no way to peace; peace is the way
Re: Configuring a custom UserManager
On 12 November 2010 08:58, David Latorre dvl...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/11/11 John Hartnup john.hart...@gmail.com: OK, I've explained the issue. I was looking at the 1.1.0 SNAPSHOT source, while running the stable 1.0.5 code. 1.0.5 does not use the dynamically configured CommandFactory for SITE commands. Is there some sort of guesstimate as to when 1.1.0 will become a stable release? Maybe Niklas can give you an estimate, but there have been few changes for 1.1.x ... Yes, I've noticed a lot of the changes, and I like them! I think the users mailing list was a more appropriate choice in your case. Note that FTPServer 'dev' list is the same as MINA developers list so I recommend that you use the prefix [FTPSERVER] or similar when you want to ask anything specific to FTPServer. Noted: thanks. -- There is no way to peace; peace is the way
[jira] Created: (SSHD-96) Virtual File System improvement for SCP and session injection
Virtual File System improvement for SCP and session injection - Key: SSHD-96 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-96 Project: MINA SSHD Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.5.0 Reporter: Frank van der Kleij The SCP Command does not yet use the Virtual File System implemented in SSHD-82. Another improvement is passing the ServerSession to FileSystemFactory instead of just the user name. This allows the injection of information known in the Authenticator into the file system. The particular use case is the implementation of a Virtual File System based on Apache Commons VFS. There the authenticator already contains the root file object (resulting from the authentication) which needs to be passed to the FileSystemView. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (SSHD-96) Virtual File System improvement for SCP and session injection
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Frank van der Kleij updated SSHD-96: Attachment: sshd-96.patch This patch adds the requested changes. Virtual File System improvement for SCP and session injection - Key: SSHD-96 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SSHD-96 Project: MINA SSHD Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.5.0 Reporter: Frank van der Kleij Attachments: sshd-96.patch The SCP Command does not yet use the Virtual File System implemented in SSHD-82. Another improvement is passing the ServerSession to FileSystemFactory instead of just the user name. This allows the injection of information known in the Authenticator into the file system. The particular use case is the implementation of a Virtual File System based on Apache Commons VFS. There the authenticator already contains the root file object (resulting from the authentication) which needs to be passed to the FileSystemView. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
