Re: Trinidad - JSF 2.0
Hey Paul, a new CSS/Skin has also been discussed; I am cc'ing Catalin, as one of his colleagues was working on that in the past. -Matthias On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > hi paul, > @trinidad for jsf 2.0: see [1] > regards, > gerhard > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg42324.html > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF powerhouse - > JSF Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2010/1/5 Paul Pasquel >> >> HI >> >> >> >> We have developed an application using Oracle ADF components. After we had >> to migrate it to Apache Trinidad. >> >> >> >> My question is, what is the future for Apache Trinidad ? Are you planning >> to release a version compatibility with JSF 2.0 ? when ? >> >> >> >> And, finally, what is the vision of the components?. Create new components >> ... add more functionalities .. create better css compatibility.. etc >> >> >> >> Thanks in Advanced >> >> -- >> This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: Trinidad - JSF 2.0
hi paul, @trinidad for jsf 2.0: see [1] regards, gerhard [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg42324.html http://www.irian.at Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2010/1/5 Paul Pasquel > HI > > > > We have developed an application using Oracle ADF components. After we had > to migrate it to Apache Trinidad. > > > > My question is, what is the future for Apache Trinidad ? Are you planning > to release a version compatibility with JSF 2.0 ? when ? > > > > And, finally, what is the vision of the components?. Create new components > ... add more functionalities .. create better css compatibility.. etc > > > > Thanks in Advanced > > -- > This email was Anti Virus checked by Astaro Security Gateway. > >
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
I don't believe that SessionSerializationChecker should have a getWrapped method yet. This class follows the pattern of the Collections decorators which don't have getWrapped(). -- Blake Sullivan Martin Kočí said the following On 10/8/2009 3:55 AM PT: Hi, I'm using trinidad with mojarra 2.0. These are steps to get trinidad compiled and running on JSF 2.0: 1) Since 2.0 all method on wrappers are public. In this case it is: - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl - make getWrapped public - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl - make getWrapped -> public Those changes are backward compatible with 1.2. 2) Make NavigationHandlerImpl child of javax.faces.application.ConfigurableNavigationHandler 3) Use javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper instead of ExternalContextDecorator and make changes: - SessionSerializationChecker - add method getWrapped - XmlHttpPortletExternalContext -add method getWrapped - OverrideDispatch - add method getWrapped - ClearRequestExternalContext - add method getWrapped 4) Use Facelets API from javax.faces instead of com.sun I'll create patches - can you add version 2.0 to JIRA please? Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 10:24 +0200: Hello Andy, I created the "experimental" branch on this location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x Greetings, Matthias On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Andy Schwartz wrote: Gang - I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0 integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this effort. Thoughts? Andy
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Martin Kočí wrote:
>
> Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 12:50 +0200:
>> the goal is not only to make it running with JSF 2.0;
>> the goal is to support JSF 2.0 features w/in Trinidad.
>
> Yes, I understand that. Right now I'm working on Resource API support -
> I'll provide some patches for #{resource['image.jpg']} etc.
cool :)
>
>
> Martin
>
>>
>> -Matthias
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Martin Kočí wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm using trinidad with mojarra 2.0. These are steps to get trinidad
>> > compiled and running on JSF 2.0:
>> >
>> > 1) Since 2.0 all method on wrappers are public. In this case it is:
>> > - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl -
>> > make getWrapped public
>> > - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl - make
>> > getWrapped -> public
>> >
>> > Those changes are backward compatible with 1.2.
>> >
>> >
>> > 2) Make NavigationHandlerImpl child of
>> > javax.faces.application.ConfigurableNavigationHandler
>> >
>> >
>> > 3) Use javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper instead of
>> > ExternalContextDecorator
>> >
>> > and make changes:
>> > - SessionSerializationChecker - add method getWrapped
>> > - XmlHttpPortletExternalContext -add method getWrapped
>> > - OverrideDispatch - add method getWrapped
>> > - ClearRequestExternalContext - add method getWrapped
>> >
>> >
>> > 4) Use Facelets API from javax.faces instead of com.sun
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I'll create patches - can you add version 2.0 to JIRA please?
>> >
>> >
>> > Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 10:24 +0200:
>> >> Hello Andy,
>> >>
>> >> I created the "experimental" branch on this location:
>> >>
>> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Greetings,
>> >> Matthias
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Andy Schwartz
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Gang -
>> >> >
>> >> > I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0
>> >> > integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested
>> >> > in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for
>> >> > JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an
>> >> > experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping
>> >> > purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this
>> >> > effort.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thoughts?
>> >> >
>> >> > Andy
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 12:50 +0200:
> the goal is not only to make it running with JSF 2.0;
> the goal is to support JSF 2.0 features w/in Trinidad.
Yes, I understand that. Right now I'm working on Resource API support -
I'll provide some patches for #{resource['image.jpg']} etc.
Martin
>
> -Matthias
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Martin Kočí wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm using trinidad with mojarra 2.0. These are steps to get trinidad
> > compiled and running on JSF 2.0:
> >
> > 1) Since 2.0 all method on wrappers are public. In this case it is:
> > - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl -
> > make getWrapped public
> > - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl - make
> > getWrapped -> public
> >
> > Those changes are backward compatible with 1.2.
> >
> >
> > 2) Make NavigationHandlerImpl child of
> > javax.faces.application.ConfigurableNavigationHandler
> >
> >
> > 3) Use javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper instead of
> > ExternalContextDecorator
> >
> > and make changes:
> > - SessionSerializationChecker - add method getWrapped
> > - XmlHttpPortletExternalContext -add method getWrapped
> > - OverrideDispatch - add method getWrapped
> > - ClearRequestExternalContext - add method getWrapped
> >
> >
> > 4) Use Facelets API from javax.faces instead of com.sun
> >
> >
> >
> > I'll create patches - can you add version 2.0 to JIRA please?
> >
> >
> > Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 10:24 +0200:
> >> Hello Andy,
> >>
> >> I created the "experimental" branch on this location:
> >>
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x
> >>
> >>
> >> Greetings,
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Andy Schwartz
> >> wrote:
> >> > Gang -
> >> >
> >> > I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0
> >> > integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested
> >> > in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for
> >> > JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an
> >> > experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping
> >> > purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this
> >> > effort.
> >> >
> >> > Thoughts?
> >> >
> >> > Andy
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
>
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
done; added "2.0.0-core" -Matthias On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > oh, yes. I will add a new version :-) > > Thanks for the feedback! > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Wessendorf > wrote: >> the goal is not only to make it running with JSF 2.0; >> the goal is to support JSF 2.0 features w/in Trinidad. >> >> -Matthias >> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Martin Kočí wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm using trinidad with mojarra 2.0. These are steps to get trinidad >>> compiled and running on JSF 2.0: >>> >>> 1) Since 2.0 all method on wrappers are public. In this case it is: >>> - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl - >>> make getWrapped public >>> - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl - make >>> getWrapped -> public >>> >>> Those changes are backward compatible with 1.2. >>> >>> >>> 2) Make NavigationHandlerImpl child of >>> javax.faces.application.ConfigurableNavigationHandler >>> >>> >>> 3) Use javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper instead of >>> ExternalContextDecorator >>> >>> and make changes: >>> - SessionSerializationChecker - add method getWrapped >>> - XmlHttpPortletExternalContext -add method getWrapped >>> - OverrideDispatch - add method getWrapped >>> - ClearRequestExternalContext - add method getWrapped >>> >>> >>> 4) Use Facelets API from javax.faces instead of com.sun >>> >>> >>> >>> I'll create patches - can you add version 2.0 to JIRA please? >>> >>> >>> Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 10:24 +0200: Hello Andy, I created the "experimental" branch on this location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x Greetings, Matthias On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Andy Schwartz wrote: > Gang - > > I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0 > integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested > in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for > JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an > experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping > purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this > effort. > > Thoughts? > > Andy > >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matthias Wessendorf >> >> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ >> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf >> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
oh, yes. I will add a new version :-) Thanks for the feedback! On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > the goal is not only to make it running with JSF 2.0; > the goal is to support JSF 2.0 features w/in Trinidad. > > -Matthias > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Martin Kočí wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm using trinidad with mojarra 2.0. These are steps to get trinidad >> compiled and running on JSF 2.0: >> >> 1) Since 2.0 all method on wrappers are public. In this case it is: >> - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl - >> make getWrapped public >> - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl - make >> getWrapped -> public >> >> Those changes are backward compatible with 1.2. >> >> >> 2) Make NavigationHandlerImpl child of >> javax.faces.application.ConfigurableNavigationHandler >> >> >> 3) Use javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper instead of >> ExternalContextDecorator >> >> and make changes: >> - SessionSerializationChecker - add method getWrapped >> - XmlHttpPortletExternalContext -add method getWrapped >> - OverrideDispatch - add method getWrapped >> - ClearRequestExternalContext - add method getWrapped >> >> >> 4) Use Facelets API from javax.faces instead of com.sun >> >> >> >> I'll create patches - can you add version 2.0 to JIRA please? >> >> >> Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 10:24 +0200: >>> Hello Andy, >>> >>> I created the "experimental" branch on this location: >>> >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x >>> >>> >>> Greetings, >>> Matthias >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Andy Schwartz >>> wrote: >>> > Gang - >>> > >>> > I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0 >>> > integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested >>> > in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for >>> > JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an >>> > experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping >>> > purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this >>> > effort. >>> > >>> > Thoughts? >>> > >>> > Andy >>> > >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Matthias Wessendorf > > blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ > sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf > twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
the goal is not only to make it running with JSF 2.0; the goal is to support JSF 2.0 features w/in Trinidad. -Matthias On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Martin Kočí wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using trinidad with mojarra 2.0. These are steps to get trinidad > compiled and running on JSF 2.0: > > 1) Since 2.0 all method on wrappers are public. In this case it is: > - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl - > make getWrapped public > - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl - make > getWrapped -> public > > Those changes are backward compatible with 1.2. > > > 2) Make NavigationHandlerImpl child of > javax.faces.application.ConfigurableNavigationHandler > > > 3) Use javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper instead of > ExternalContextDecorator > > and make changes: > - SessionSerializationChecker - add method getWrapped > - XmlHttpPortletExternalContext -add method getWrapped > - OverrideDispatch - add method getWrapped > - ClearRequestExternalContext - add method getWrapped > > > 4) Use Facelets API from javax.faces instead of com.sun > > > > I'll create patches - can you add version 2.0 to JIRA please? > > > Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 10:24 +0200: >> Hello Andy, >> >> I created the "experimental" branch on this location: >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x >> >> >> Greetings, >> Matthias >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Andy Schwartz >> wrote: >> > Gang - >> > >> > I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0 >> > integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested >> > in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for >> > JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an >> > experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping >> > purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this >> > effort. >> > >> > Thoughts? >> > >> > Andy >> > >> >> >> > > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
Hi, I'm using trinidad with mojarra 2.0. These are steps to get trinidad compiled and running on JSF 2.0: 1) Since 2.0 all method on wrappers are public. In this case it is: - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.StateManagerImpl - make getWrapped public - org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.application.ViewHandlerImpl - make getWrapped -> public Those changes are backward compatible with 1.2. 2) Make NavigationHandlerImpl child of javax.faces.application.ConfigurableNavigationHandler 3) Use javax.faces.context.ExternalContextWrapper instead of ExternalContextDecorator and make changes: - SessionSerializationChecker - add method getWrapped - XmlHttpPortletExternalContext -add method getWrapped - OverrideDispatch - add method getWrapped - ClearRequestExternalContext - add method getWrapped 4) Use Facelets API from javax.faces instead of com.sun I'll create patches - can you add version 2.0 to JIRA please? Matthias Wessendorf píše v Čt 08. 10. 2009 v 10:24 +0200: > Hello Andy, > > I created the "experimental" branch on this location: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x > > > Greetings, > Matthias > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Andy Schwartz > wrote: > > Gang - > > > > I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0 > > integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested > > in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for > > JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an > > experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping > > purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this > > effort. > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Andy > > > > >
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
Hello Andy, I created the "experimental" branch on this location: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/branches/trinidad-2.0.x Greetings, Matthias On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Andy Schwartz wrote: > Gang - > > I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0 > integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested > in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for > JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an > experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping > purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this > effort. > > Thoughts? > > Andy > -- Matthias Wessendorf blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
Good! Looking forward that :) Cheers, Bruno 2009/10/8 Matthias Wessendorf > Sure! Let me create such à branch. you create jira tickets for all the > issues. > > -Matthias > > Sent from my iPod. > > > On 08.10.2009, at 02:37, Andy Schwartz wrote: > > Gang - >> >> I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0 >> integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested >> in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for >> JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an >> experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping >> purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this >> effort. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Andy >> >
Re: [Trinidad] JSF 2.0
Sure! Let me create such à branch. you create jira tickets for all the issues. -Matthias Sent from my iPod. On 08.10.2009, at 02:37, Andy Schwartz wrote: Gang - I am interested in taking a closer look at Trinidad/JSF 2.0 integration. I suspect that there are other folks who are interested in this as well. Would it be possible to create a Trinidad branch for JSF 2.0-related work? For the moment, I think that an experimental/sandbox-type branch that we could use for prototyping purposes would be helpful/would facilitate collaboration on this effort. Thoughts? Andy
