[website] Questions: migration, web server & HTTP 301

[Antonio]

Hi all,

In order to plan the migration to the new site we'll have to add HTTP 
301 redirections. This will tell search engines that some of the URLs in 
the current ("old") website have been moved permanently to other URLs in 
the new site (see [1 & 2], for example).


These 301 redirections are better handled in the configuration of the 
web server, using some sort of rewrite module that rewrites (some) old 
urls into new ones.


Which server will be using? I imagine this will run in an Apache web 
server. Am I right? Is Apache Tomcat an option? If so, which version? 
Will "mod_rewrite" be available?


Will we be able to submit a ton of "mod_rewrite" entries to be added to 
the web server configuration? In fact, will we be able to handle the 
configuration of the web server ourselves or will this be handled by 
Apache INFRA?


Thanks
Antonio


[1]
http://www.somacon.com/p145.php

[2]
https://www.branded3.com/blog/website-migration-guide-building-an-seo-checklist-for-moving-your-site/

Re: [website] Preferred CSS framework?

[Delfi Ramirez]

hi Neal:

no difficulties for Zurb foundation, i guess. even having Ruby in mind 
is quite Java-ish .  in case of need i can upload a small tut ( visuals 
et al 9


tomorrow I will play with Prime ( for the GitHub mimesis ), to see how 
it works, and how easy is to deploy with.


I am open, yet to the best solution the incubator team decides.

regards


On 08/12/2017 23:16, Neil C Smith wrote:

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:57 PM Delfi Ramirez 
wrote:


agreed too, on concerning lighweightness. zurb Foundation is modular ,
Cons. main issue as mentioned before its dependencies on an specific JS
library.


Been looking at Foundation 6 and looks like they've addressed some of my
concerns.  This is worth a read
https://goamplifi.com/5-reasons-we-chose-bourbonneat-over-foundation-or-bootstrap/
Similar reasons to that we had for choosing Bourbon in 2015 - so pre 6.

I guess the other question then is how easy it is to integrate into the
JBake build system?

Best wishes,

Neil





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [website] Preferred CSS framework?

[Neil C Smith]

On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 9:57 PM Delfi Ramirez 
wrote:

> agreed too, on concerning lighweightness. zurb Foundation is modular ,
> Cons. main issue as mentioned before its dependencies on an specific JS
> library.
>
Been looking at Foundation 6 and looks like they've addressed some of my
concerns.  This is worth a read
https://goamplifi.com/5-reasons-we-chose-bourbonneat-over-foundation-or-bootstrap/
Similar reasons to that we had for choosing Bourbon in 2015 - so pre 6.

I guess the other question then is how easy it is to integrate into the
JBake build system?

Best wishes,

Neil
-- 
Neil C Smith
Artist & Technologist
www.neilcsmith.net

Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org

[GitHub] geertjanw commented on issue #321: Trying to resolve some more verify-libs-and-licenses warnings.

[GitBox]

geertjanw commented on issue #321: Trying to resolve some more 
verify-libs-and-licenses warnings.
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/321#issuecomment-350384633
 
 
   Excellent. 


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

[GitHub] geertjanw closed pull request #321: Trying to resolve some more verify-libs-and-licenses warnings.

[GitBox]

geertjanw closed pull request #321: Trying to resolve some more 
verify-libs-and-licenses warnings.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/321
 
 
   

This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:

As this is a foreign pull request (from a fork), the diff is supplied
below (as it won't show otherwise due to GitHub magic):

diff --git a/db.dataview/external/h2-1.4.196-license.txt 
b/db.dataview/external/h2-1.4.196-license.txt
index cd1a25aed..412ae5373 100644
--- a/db.dataview/external/h2-1.4.196-license.txt
+++ b/db.dataview/external/h2-1.4.196-license.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name: H2 Database Engine
 Version: 1.4.196
-License: EPL-v10
+License: EPL-v10-h2
 Description: The H2 Database Enginge is a pure java database, that can be used 
in embedded and server mode.
 Origin: http://h2database.com
 
diff --git a/db.dataview/external/h2-1.4.196-notice.txt 
b/db.dataview/external/h2-1.4.196-notice.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 7bb941925..0
--- a/db.dataview/external/h2-1.4.196-notice.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,6 +0,0 @@
-This software contains unmodified binary redistributions for
-H2 database engine (http://www.h2database.com/),
-which is dual licensed and available under the MPL 2.0
-(Mozilla Public License) or under the EPL 1.0 (Eclipse Public License).
-An original copy of the license agreement can be found at:
-http://www.h2database.com/html/license.html
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/dlight.nativeexecution/external/exechlp-1.0-license.txt 
b/dlight.nativeexecution/external/exechlp-1.0-license.txt
index 45dff663f..777d75907 100644
--- a/dlight.nativeexecution/external/exechlp-1.0-license.txt
+++ b/dlight.nativeexecution/external/exechlp-1.0-license.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
 Name: exechlp
-Version: 1.0
 Description: binaries that used by dlight.nativeexecution module 
(process_start, pty, pty_open - used for dealing with pseude terminals; 
sigqueue, killall - sending signals to processes; stat - getting detailed file 
information; unbuffer.so - used when unbuffering is required)
+Version: 1.0
 License: CDDL-1.0
+Origin: NetBeans
 Comment: needed for dlight.nativeexecution module to provide system-dependent 
services
 
 COMMON DEVELOPMENT AND DISTRIBUTION LICENSE (CDDL) Version 1.0
diff --git a/html.editor/external/html-4.01-license.txt 
b/html.editor/external/html-4.01-license.txt
index 6b8916f88..2a8516942 100644
--- a/html.editor/external/html-4.01-license.txt
+++ b/html.editor/external/html-4.01-license.txt
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
 Name: HTML 4.01 Specification
-License: W3C (the original at http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/)
-OSR: 2664
-Version: 4.01
 Description: Documentation for the HTML 4.01 standard
-Origin: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/
+License: W3C
+Version: 4.01
+Origin: W3C
+URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/
 
 W3C (R) Intellectual Rights Notice and Legal Disclaimers
 
diff --git a/html.parser/external/html5doc-license.txt 
b/html.parser/external/html5doc-license.txt
index 7ba616131..472c0334d 100644
--- a/html.parser/external/html5doc-license.txt
+++ b/html.parser/external/html5doc-license.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
 Name: HTML 5 Specification
 License: HTML5DOC
-OSR: -
 Version: -
 Description: Documentation for the HTML 5 standard
 Origin: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/
diff --git a/html.parser/external/htmlparser-1.2.1-license.txt 
b/html.parser/external/htmlparser-1.2.1-license.txt
index d05494b1b..f8eb4a2d0 100644
--- a/html.parser/external/htmlparser-1.2.1-license.txt
+++ b/html.parser/external/htmlparser-1.2.1-license.txt
@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
 Name: HTML 5 Parser Patched
-Version: -
-License: MIT-html5-parser
-OSR: -
-Files: htmlparser-1.2.1.jar
 Description: HTML4/5 parser patched for editing purposes
+Version: 1.2.1
+License: MIT-html5-parser
 Origin: validator.nu
 
 
diff --git a/html.parser/external/icu4j-4_4_2-license.txt 
b/html.parser/external/icu4j-4_4_2-license.txt
index 492f45b53..d89df10f6 100644
--- a/html.parser/external/icu4j-4_4_2-license.txt
+++ b/html.parser/external/icu4j-4_4_2-license.txt
@@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
 Name: ICU4J
-Version: 4.4.2
-License: MIT-icu4j
-OSR: -
-Files: icu4j-4_4_2.jar
 Description: Unicode and Globalization support
+Version: 4_4_2
+License: MIT-icu4j
 Origin: http://site.icu-project.org/
 
 ICU License - ICU 1.8.1 and later
diff --git a/html.validation/external/binaries-list 
b/html.validation/external/binaries-list
index 9ff93ff1d..8114bd4f7 100644
--- a/html.validation/external/binaries-list
+++ b/html.validation/external/binaries-list
@@ -14,9 +14,9 @@
 # KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
 # specific language governing permissions and limitations
 # under the License.
-0DCC973606CBD9737541AA5F3E76DED6E3F4D0D0 iri.jar
-483A61B688B13C62BB201A683D98A6688B5373B6 jing.jar
-F0A0D2E29ED910808C33135A3A5A51BBA6358F7B log4j-1.2.15.jar

Re: [website] Preferred CSS framework?

[Delfi Ramirez]

hi Neal, dear all.

agreed too, on concerning lighweightness. zurb Foundation is modular , 
Cons. main issue as mentioned before its dependencies on an specific JS 
library.


maybe the people at Zurb be interested to get involved in the Netbeans 
Platform. sure they are open to proposals.


If we have to master the app and the site, I add two more 
libs-frameworks for consideration


 * Primer, is supporting the
   GitHub platform. easy to mimetic if that is the purpose of the
   website and JAVAFX modules  I have not tested yet,
 * if lightweight, and just the web app needs the framework, have a
   look a *Pure* https://purecss.io/layouts/ Jut 3Kb Not a fave. but.

Still, my vote goes for Foundation.

Cheers

On 08/12/2017 22:16, Neil C Smith wrote:

Hi,

Happy to work with Foundation 6 if that's what we go with, but I would like
to throw Bourbon and Neat into the discussion. I've worked with it a lot.
Much more modular and lightweight - we're NetBeans people, we're meant to
like modularity! ;-)

Best wishes,

Neil

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, 21:01 Antonio,  wrote:


Excellent choice!

Thanks Delfi!

El 08/12/17 a las 21:49, Delfi Ramirez escribió:

my vote goes for *foundation 6 * too. is mature and The template system
is excellent to deploy prototypes and components is fast way and its
learning curve is easy.

Note: This framework, due to compatibility issues,  has dependencies on
jQuery libs which may be cause of security issues and bugs




On 08/12/2017 20:50, Antonio wrote:

Hi all,

Do we have a preferred CSS framework? If so, which one?

If we don't, which is your preferred one between the following ones?

- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.

Thanks,
Antonio

P.S.: Do we have a preferred color palette? A NetBeans web style guide?





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

[GitHub] jlahoda opened a new pull request #321: Trying to resolve some more verify-libs-and-licenses warnings.

[GitBox]

jlahoda opened a new pull request #321: Trying to resolve some more 
verify-libs-and-licenses warnings.
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/321
 
 
   There is only a handful of warnings in the import testcase ("testLicenses") 
left. But the remaining ones mostly appear tricky - I'll send an e-mail about 
them later.
   
   The warnings under testLicenseFilesAreProperlyFormattedPhysically and 
testBinaryUniqueness will probably be solved easily when the "testLicenses" 
warnings are gone.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Re: [website] Preferred CSS framework?

[Delfi Ramirez]

my pleasure , Antonio

glad to be of help

cheers


On 08/12/2017 22:00, Antonio wrote:

Excellent choice!

Thanks Delfi!

El 08/12/17 a las 21:49, Delfi Ramirez escribió:
my vote goes for *foundation 6 * too. is mature and The template 
system is excellent to deploy prototypes and components is fast way 
and its learning curve is easy.


Note: This framework, due to compatibility issues,  has dependencies 
on jQuery libs which may be cause of security issues and bugs





On 08/12/2017 20:50, Antonio wrote:

Hi all,

Do we have a preferred CSS framework? If so, which one?

If we don't, which is your preferred one between the following ones?

- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.

Thanks,
Antonio

P.S.: Do we have a preferred color palette? A NetBeans web style guide?










smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [website] Preferred CSS framework?

[Antonio]

Excellent choice!

Thanks Delfi!

El 08/12/17 a las 21:49, Delfi Ramirez escribió:
my vote goes for *foundation 6 * too. is mature and The template system 
is excellent to deploy prototypes and components is fast way and its 
learning curve is easy.


Note: This framework, due to compatibility issues,  has dependencies on 
jQuery libs which may be cause of security issues and bugs





On 08/12/2017 20:50, Antonio wrote:

Hi all,

Do we have a preferred CSS framework? If so, which one?

If we don't, which is your preferred one between the following ones?

- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.

Thanks,
Antonio

P.S.: Do we have a preferred color palette? A NetBeans web style guide?

Re: [website] Preferred CSS framework?

[Delfi Ramirez]

my vote goes for *foundation 6 * too. is mature and The template system 
is excellent to deploy prototypes and components is fast way and its 
learning curve is easy.


Note: This framework, due to compatibility issues,  has dependencies on 
jQuery libs which may be cause of security issues and bugs





On 08/12/2017 20:50, Antonio wrote:

Hi all,

Do we have a preferred CSS framework? If so, which one?

If we don't, which is your preferred one between the following ones?

- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.

Thanks,
Antonio

P.S.: Do we have a preferred color palette? A NetBeans web style guide?





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [website] Preferred CSS framework?

[Geertjan Wielenga]

Of those three, Foundation 6 sounds good..

Gj

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 at 20:50, Antonio  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> Do we have a preferred CSS framework? If so, which one?
>
> If we don't, which is your preferred one between the following ones?
>
> - Foundation 6.
> - Foundation 6.
> - Foundation 6.
>
> Thanks,
> Antonio
>
> P.S.: Do we have a preferred color palette? A NetBeans web style guide?
>

[website] Preferred CSS framework?

[Antonio]

Hi all,

Do we have a preferred CSS framework? If so, which one?

If we don't, which is your preferred one between the following ones?

- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.
- Foundation 6.

Thanks,
Antonio

P.S.: Do we have a preferred color palette? A NetBeans web style guide?

[GitHub] matthiasblaesing closed pull request #289: [NETBEANS-126] Replace with trademark free icons

[GitBox]

matthiasblaesing closed pull request #289: [NETBEANS-126] Replace with 
trademark free icons
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/289
 
 
   

This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:

As this is a foreign pull request (from a fork), the diff is supplied
below (as it won't show otherwise due to GitHub magic):

diff --git 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/chrome20-disabled.png 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/chrome20-disabled.png
index d6168216e..0e697f806 100644
Binary files 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/chrome20-disabled.png 
and 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/chrome20-disabled.png 
differ
diff --git 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/chrome20.png 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/chrome20.png
index d6168216e..176a8020a 100644
Binary files 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/chrome20.png and 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/chrome20.png differ
diff --git 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/firefox20-disabled.png
 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/firefox20-disabled.png
index d6168216e..09b0f9945 100644
Binary files 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/firefox20-disabled.png
 and 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/firefox20-disabled.png
 differ
diff --git 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/firefox20.png 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/firefox20.png
index d6168216e..ffab0780c 100644
Binary files 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/firefox20.png and 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/firefox20.png differ
diff --git 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/ie20-disabled.png 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/ie20-disabled.png
index d6168216e..b2f00b914 100644
Binary files 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/ie20-disabled.png and 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/ie20-disabled.png 
differ
diff --git a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/ie20.png 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/ie20.png
index d6168216e..d339590ae 100644
Binary files a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/ie20.png 
and b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/ie20.png differ
diff --git 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/opera20-disabled.png 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/opera20-disabled.png
index d6168216e..bcf1ba00c 100644
Binary files 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/opera20-disabled.png 
and 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/opera20-disabled.png 
differ
diff --git 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/opera20.png 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/opera20.png
index d6168216e..2c80ae41d 100644
Binary files 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/opera20.png and 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/opera20.png differ
diff --git 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/safari20-disabled.png 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/safari20-disabled.png
index d6168216e..c972b0256 100644
Binary files 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/safari20-disabled.png 
and 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/safari20-disabled.png 
differ
diff --git 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/safari20.png 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/safari20.png
index d6168216e..44369a3f3 100644
Binary files 
a/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/safari20.png and 
b/css.editor/src/org/netbeans/modules/css/resources/icons/safari20.png differ
diff --git 
a/web.browser.api/src/org/netbeans/modules/web/browser/ui/resources/browser_chrome_16x.png
 
b/web.browser.api/src/org/netbeans/modules/web/browser/ui/resources/browser_chrome_16x.png
index 52855d9a8..5ab16b513 100644
Binary files 
a/web.browser.api/src/org/netbeans/modules/web/browser/ui/resources/browser_chrome_16x.png
 and 
b/web.browser.api/src/org/netbeans/modules/web/browser/ui/resources/browser_chrome_16x.png
 differ
diff --git 
a/web.browser.api/src/org/netbeans/modules/web/browser/ui/resources/browser_chrome_24x.png
 
b/web.browser.api/src/org/netbeans/modules/web/browser/ui/resources/browser_chrome_24x.png
index 297379dfe..922b645c3 100644
Binary files 
a/web.browser.api/src/org/netbeans/modules/web/browser/ui/resources/browser_chrome_24x.png
 and 

[GitHub] matthiasblaesing commented on issue #289: [NETBEANS-126] Replace with trademark free icons

[GitBox]

matthiasblaesing commented on issue #289: [NETBEANS-126] Replace with trademark 
free icons
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-netbeans/pull/289#issuecomment-350334743
 
 
   Closing this, as the alternative PR #251 was merged.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Re: NetBeans Website Conversion, Plan, and Call for Help

[Geertjan Wielenga]

Yes exactly. And the Jbake infrastructure is already there with the start
of templating in place as well, see the link I sent earlier re the Java SE
Quick Start Guide which is set up already with a template to get things
going as a starting point. Movement on this is needed and really great
you’re picking this up.

Gj

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 at 17:56, Antonio  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> So I have some time to spend here, and I was thinking it would be a
> great idea to explain what I understand so you can tell me if I'm
> understanding things right. Please see the small image attached.
>
>  From the WIKI and Wade's repository what I understand is that we'll be
> working against Wade's repository, fine-tuning the future NetBeans
> website. Once done we'll be able to host a website repository under the
> Apache umbrella.
>
> So we'll need a basic website layout, that should look like the current
> one to avoid url mismatches, I imagine. And we'll need to work out some
> jbake+groovy templates to polish the content until it fits the directory
> layout.
>
> Am I getting it right?
>
> Thanks,
> Antonio
>
>
>
> On 03/12/17 05:07, Wade Chandler wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I will try to keep this short as one can read details here
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/New+NetBeans+Web+Site+Planning
> <
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/New+NetBeans+Web+Site+Planning
> >
> >
> > I’m still working on the site planning page, but I think there is enough
> there to get started and have others chip in, and please feel free to add
> sections I’m missing, and feel free to ask any questions, and I or someone
> else will try to address them. I would also like to get a Kanban board
> setup for this, and will try to get that done soon. Please ask for more
> details on the plan page or let me know what else might be useful for us to
> organize.
> >
> > Also, please fully read the docs here
> https://github.com/wadechandler/netbeans-static-site <
> https://github.com/wadechandler/netbeans-static-site> and if anything is
> missing or needs to be more clear, then please add an issue or send an
> email, and I will try to clear it up, and we can work through it.
> >
> > There is a lot to do to convert the NetBeans website over to Apache.
> Beyond just the static content, we have these other dynamic aspects which I
> have yet to be able to devote any real thought.
> >
> > I’m currently working on scripting the static content to fit the SSG,
> and that is a pretty big task, and I have more to do. Any help related to
> the areas I have not yet been able to touch is more than welcome.
> >
> > You’ll notice the page says we're using the repository linked above for
> now, and that its only purpose is to cleanup the content, and shrink it,
> before moving it over to the incubator site repository; imagine how large
> that history will be if all the cruft is left in place. Anyways, it is
> definitely temporary, and then will be pushed to the Apache repository.
> >
> > If there is an area anyone would like to jump in on, feel free to put
> your name beside an area in the Wiki and/or assign some issues to yourself.
> I’m taking Thur and Fri off through the end of the year, and plan to work
> diligently on the content conversion during that time, and hopefully narrow
> the plan more too.
> >
> > Thank you much!
> >
> > Wade
> >
> >
> >
>

Re: NetBeans Website Conversion, Plan, and Call for Help

[Antonio]

Hi all,

So I have some time to spend here, and I was thinking it would be a 
great idea to explain what I understand so you can tell me if I'm 
understanding things right. Please see the small image attached


From the WIKI and Wade's repository what I understand is that we'll be 
working against Wade's repository, fine-tuning the future NetBeans 
website. Once done we'll be able to host a website repository under the 
Apache umbrella.


So we'll need a basic website layout, that should look like the current 
one to avoid url mismatches, I imagine. And we'll need to work out some 
jbake+groovy templates to polish the content until it fits the directory 
layout.


Am I getting it right?

Thanks,
Antonio



On 03/12/17 05:07, Wade Chandler wrote:

All,

I will try to keep this short as one can read details here 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/New+NetBeans+Web+Site+Planning 


I’m still working on the site planning page, but I think there is enough there 
to get started and have others chip in, and please feel free to add sections 
I’m missing, and feel free to ask any questions, and I or someone else will try 
to address them. I would also like to get a Kanban board setup for this, and 
will try to get that done soon. Please ask for more details on the plan page or 
let me know what else might be useful for us to organize.

Also, please fully read the docs here 
https://github.com/wadechandler/netbeans-static-site 
 and if anything is 
missing or needs to be more clear, then please add an issue or send an email, and I 
will try to clear it up, and we can work through it.

There is a lot to do to convert the NetBeans website over to Apache. Beyond 
just the static content, we have these other dynamic aspects which I have yet 
to be able to devote any real thought.

I’m currently working on scripting the static content to fit the SSG, and that 
is a pretty big task, and I have more to do. Any help related to the areas I 
have not yet been able to touch is more than welcome.

You’ll notice the page says we're using the repository linked above for now, 
and that its only purpose is to cleanup the content, and shrink it, before 
moving it over to the incubator site repository; imagine how large that history 
will be if all the cruft is left in place. Anyways, it is definitely temporary, 
and then will be pushed to the Apache repository.

If there is an area anyone would like to jump in on, feel free to put your name 
beside an area in the Wiki and/or assign some issues to yourself. I’m taking 
Thur and Fri off through the end of the year, and plan to work diligently on 
the content conversion during that time, and hopefully narrow the plan more too.

Thank you much!

Wade