Re: Short term plans for official releases
Hi Jacques, On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Jacopo, I have just added this sentence to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan#ReleasePlan-GeneralReleasePolicies * Because it needs too much work, at some point older releases will not be supported by the community (trunk patches not backported) I have also noticed this sentence (just before the one I added) * Each new release tag and pre-built package will be represented by a third position version number change (since February 2009 seems that we will prefer to use the revision number for that) I like the idea of adding the revision number rather than a third position version number, maybe it's not worth changing now but we could stick with it for future releases? (It relates to this thead http://markmail.org/message/3xhnpbbmceg5hdg7) We could, but the release name convention we are using has been already changed too many times (and we ended up with a bad one imo) so my preference would be to postpone any decision to change it another time unless we all want and agree upon a much better one. About the download page, looks good to me, some questions: *Something is not clear to me Apache OFBiz 10.04 This release contains all the features of the trunk up to April 2010 and since then has been stabilized with bug fixes. So it means that the zip is automatically updated from the repo (when changed) and always last revision accessible to mirrors, right? Same for 09.04.01, I guess? No we cannot do this: all the files from the download page must be official releases (i.e. voted for release by the PMC). As regards the 10.04, the release date is mentioned in the next sentence: It is our current stable release, and has been officially released in January 2011. As regards 09.04.01, the release date is mentione here: Apache OFBiz 09.04.01 is the current and latest release of the 09.04 series; it is a bug fix release, issued in January 2011 * Under the Snapshots section, I'd like to add some words about svn repo, trunk and releases branches. Do you think it makes sense (it's not releases but could interest, make quicker links for developers) No please, do not add download links etc because all the information if this page should only contain official files; in fact the snapshot section is already an exception to this rule that for now it is acceptable. But you may add a sentence to point the user to the https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html page... even if we may even want to consider to remove the snapshot section at all from the download page, and add a link to the snapshot page from the https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html instead. Jacopo Thanks Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Jacques, all, I did a series of changes (rev. 1180638) to the text and formatting of the Download page and now it should be easier to understand what to download and how things are structured; I have tried to incorporate your feedback. When you can, please have a look (and a double look to typos and grammar). Kind regards, Jacopo On Oct 8, 2011, at 5:13 PM, jacques.le.r...@spamcop.net wrote: Thanks Jacopo, I had the feeling I was missing something. I plenty agree with your suggestions. Could we not had a word on this page about live branches (vs freezed/zipped releases) and a link to repo (vs downloads mirrors)? I'm currently in vacation for a week, so I will not work on this soon... Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Thank you Jacques, please see my note below: On Oct 5, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Maybe we should make more clear somewhere that releases like 10.04.01 or 09.04.02 are only tagged revisions in respective branches (or did I miss some places where this is clearly explained?). In other words only branches are still evolving when releases are freezed. This is explainedin the official download page (where releases are published): http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html but of course we could improve the information there; I was thinking to better separate the latest release 10.04 from the older ones and also, inside a series, decrease the fonts of the older releases. Kind regards, Jacopo
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-4463) Reference to datetimepicker is wrong in CommonScreens.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129574#comment-13129574
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-4463:
Thank for report Kiran,
Fixed at r1185517.
But please keep you comments short ;)
{quote}
Thanks Jacques. BTW, you need to port your other fix to 11.04 as well:
Fix a small bug: layoutSettings.javaScripts was used when
layoutSettings.styleSheets should have been used
Regards,
Kiran Gawde
{quote}
Woulds have been enough :)
Reference to datetimepicker is wrong in CommonScreens.xml
-
Key: OFBIZ-4463
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4463
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04, SVN trunk
Reporter: Kiran Gawde
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Fix For: Release Branch 11.04, SVN trunk
Attachments: OFBIZ-4463-CommonScreensXml.patch
Need to replace
/images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker-0.9.6/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.css
with:
/images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon-0.9.6.css
Note the reference is in two places.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: Short term plans for official releases
Hi Jacopo, From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Hi Jacques, On Oct 16, 2011, at 11:52 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Jacopo, I have just added this sentence to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan#ReleasePlan-GeneralReleasePolicies * Because it needs too much work, at some point older releases will not be supported by the community (trunk patches not backported) I have also noticed this sentence (just before the one I added) * Each new release tag and pre-built package will be represented by a third position version number change (since February 2009 seems that we will prefer to use the revision number for that) I like the idea of adding the revision number rather than a third position version number, maybe it's not worth changing now but we could stick with it for future releases? (It relates to this thead http://markmail.org/message/3xhnpbbmceg5hdg7) We could, but the release name convention we are using has been already changed too many times (and we ended up with a bad one imo) so my preference would be to postpone any decision to change it another time unless we all want and agree upon a much better one. OK, not a problem with me. The same (than Bruno) was also asked later by Ruth later (in another thread) BTW... What don't you like in the release name convention? The Ubuntu way? About the download page, looks good to me, some questions: *Something is not clear to me Apache OFBiz 10.04 This release contains all the features of the trunk up to April 2010 and since then has been stabilized with bug fixes. So it means that the zip is automatically updated from the repo (when changed) and always last revision accessible to mirrors, right? Same for 09.04.01, I guess? No we cannot do this: all the files from the download page must be official releases (i.e. voted for release by the PMC). As regards the 10.04, the release date is mentioned in the next sentence: It is our current stable release, and has been officially released in January 2011. As regards 09.04.01, the release date is mentione here: Apache OFBiz 09.04.01 is the current and latest release of the 09.04 series; it is a bug fix release, issued in January 2011 OK, thanks for clarifying * Under the Snapshots section, I'd like to add some words about svn repo, trunk and releases branches. Do you think it makes sense (it's not releases but could interest, make quicker links for developers) No please, do not add download links etc because all the information if this page should only contain official files; in fact the snapshot section is already an exception to this rule that for now it is acceptable. But you may add a sentence to point the user to the https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html page... even if we may even want to consider to remove the snapshot section at all from the download page, and add a link to the snapshot page from the https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html instead. Then, I think the https://cwiki.apache.org/OFBADMIN/ofbiz-source-repository-and-access.html page is clear enough. I'd not move the snapshot section except if it really hurts someone there? Mmm though maybe it would remove some confusion for end users... Opinions, before we close this thread? Jacques Jacopo Thanks Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Jacques, all, I did a series of changes (rev. 1180638) to the text and formatting of the Download page and now it should be easier to understand what to download and how things are structured; I have tried to incorporate your feedback. When you can, please have a look (and a double look to typos and grammar). Kind regards, Jacopo On Oct 8, 2011, at 5:13 PM, jacques.le.r...@spamcop.net wrote: Thanks Jacopo, I had the feeling I was missing something. I plenty agree with your suggestions. Could we not had a word on this page about live branches (vs freezed/zipped releases) and a link to repo (vs downloads mirrors)? I'm currently in vacation for a week, so I will not work on this soon... Jacques From: Jacopo Cappellato jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com Thank you Jacques, please see my note below: On Oct 5, 2011, at 3:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: Maybe we should make more clear somewhere that releases like 10.04.01 or 09.04.02 are only tagged revisions in respective branches (or did I miss some places where this is clearly explained?). In other words only branches are still evolving when releases are freezed. This is explainedin the official download page (where releases are published): http://ofbiz.apache.org/download.html but of course we could improve the information there; I was thinking to better separate the latest release 10.04 from the older ones and also, inside a series, decrease the fonts of the older releases. Kind regards, Jacopo
[jira] [Commented] (OFBIZ-3894) Refactor Email handling
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129638#comment-13129638 ] Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-3894: -- I work to create new service for send mail with new model and alert you well is done. The next step with content merge to send email, I wish separate on two commits. At this time the patch is so bigger and adding all improvement with content will be difficult to review. Refactor Email handling --- Key: OFBIZ-3894 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3894 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Improvement Components: ALL COMPONENTS Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: BJ Freeman Priority: Minor Fix For: SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-3894.patch, OFBIZ-3894.patch Original Estimate: 1,344h Remaining Estimate: 1,344h with the addition of the Website for each component 1) create product store for Order entry, or use the B2C product store. 2) move the email widgets from ecommerce to order compontent. 3) modify the seed data so that Order entry has it own emails from order component.this would be to add emails to note: as I go through the different items this is turning out to be a bigger project than I first anticipated. so consider this so far just ideas. Maybe break down in to small tasks as I have time to do something. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-4489) username cannot be assign security permission
username cannot be assign security permission - Key: OFBIZ-4489 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4489 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: party Affects Versions: SVN trunk Reporter: Wai PartyMgr permits the creation of a new username(or userLogin) without being associated with a party/partygroup. As a result, the new username cannot be assign to a securitygroup and hence cannot be used to access the system. Possible solution: 1. Fix code to allow a party-less username to be assigned to a securitygroup. 2. All created username must be associated with a party. Reference discussion about this issue: http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/creating-a-new-user-login-td3905814.html -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-4463) Reference to datetimepicker is wrong in CommonScreens.xml
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129148#comment-13129148 ] Kiran Gawde edited comment on OFBIZ-4463 at 10/18/11 4:11 PM: -- Thanks Jacques. BTW, you need to port your other fix to 11.04 as well: Fix a small bug: layoutSettings.javaScripts was used when layoutSettings.styleSheets should have been used Regards, Kiran Gawde was (Author: kiran_gawde): Thanks Jacques. BTW, you need to port your other fix to 11.04 as well: Fix a small bug: layoutSettings.javaScripts was used when layoutSettings.styleSheets should have been used Regards, Kiran Gawde Senior Software Architect Object Edge Inc (925) 943 5558 x108 There are two kind of people: Those who do the work and those who take the credit. Try to be in the first group because there is less competition there. Never give up on what you really want to do. The person with big dreams is more powerful than one with all the facts. From: Jacques Le Roux (Closed) (JIRA) j...@apache.org To: ki...@objectedge.com Date: 10/11/2011 12:56 AM Subject:[jira] [Closed] (OFBIZ-4463) Reference to datetimepicker is wrong in CommonScreens.xml [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jacques Le Roux closed OFBIZ-4463. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: SVN trunk Release Branch 11.04 Assignee: Jacques Le Roux (was: Sascha Rodekamp) Backported in R11.04 at r1180398 /images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker-0.9.6/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.css /images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon-0.9.6.css -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira Reference to datetimepicker is wrong in CommonScreens.xml - Key: OFBIZ-4463 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4463 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04, SVN trunk Reporter: Kiran Gawde Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: Release Branch 11.04, SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-4463-CommonScreensXml.patch Need to replace /images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker-0.9.6/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.css with: /images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon-0.9.6.css Note the reference is in two places. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-4463) Reference to datetimepicker is wrong in CommonScreens.xml
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129574#comment-13129574
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4463 at 10/18/11 8:15 PM:
--
Thank for report Kiran,
Fixed at r1185517.
But please keep you comments short ;)
was (Author: jacques.le.roux):
Thank for report Kiran,
Fixed at r1185517.
But please keep you comments short ;)
{quote}
Thanks Jacques. BTW, you need to port your other fix to 11.04 as well:
Fix a small bug: layoutSettings.javaScripts was used when
layoutSettings.styleSheets should have been used
Regards,
Kiran Gawde
{quote}
Woulds have been enough :)
Reference to datetimepicker is wrong in CommonScreens.xml
-
Key: OFBIZ-4463
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4463
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Components: framework
Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04, SVN trunk
Reporter: Kiran Gawde
Assignee: Jacques Le Roux
Fix For: Release Branch 11.04, SVN trunk
Attachments: OFBIZ-4463-CommonScreensXml.patch
Need to replace
/images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker-0.9.6/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.css
with:
/images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon-0.9.6.css
Note the reference is in two places.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-4463) Reference to datetimepicker is wrong in CommonScreens.xml
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13129574#comment-13129574 ] Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-4463 at 10/18/11 8:16 PM: -- Thank for report Kiran, Fixed at r1185517. EDIT= Removed now useless part was (Author: jacques.le.roux): Thank for report Kiran, Fixed at r1185517. But please keep you comments short ;) Reference to datetimepicker is wrong in CommonScreens.xml - Key: OFBIZ-4463 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4463 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: framework Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04, SVN trunk Reporter: Kiran Gawde Assignee: Jacques Le Roux Fix For: Release Branch 11.04, SVN trunk Attachments: OFBIZ-4463-CommonScreensXml.patch Need to replace /images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker-0.9.6/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon.css with: /images/jquery/plugins/datetimepicker/jquery-ui-timepicker-addon-0.9.6.css Note the reference is in two places. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: Short term plans for official releases
Hi Jacques, On Oct 18, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: The same (than Bruno) was also asked later by Ruth later (in another thread) BTW... What don't you like in the release name convention? The Ubuntu way? It is not a big deal but, since we have very few releases an old traditional sequence would have worked fine imo. Now we have 09.04 but people are confused because they may think there is also a 09.03 or it is not obvious that 09.04 is greater than 4. And last point, it is not that clear that 09.04 means 2009.04... But at this point it is fine and imo having one convention and sticking to it is much better than changing it. Jacopo
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-4490) Security Error: To run createAcctgTransAndEntries you must have the one of the following permissions: ACCTG_ATX_CREATE, ACCTG_ATX_ADMIN
Security Error: To run createAcctgTransAndEntries you must have the one of the following permissions: ACCTG_ATX_CREATE, ACCTG_ATX_ADMIN --- Key: OFBIZ-4490 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4490 Project: OFBiz Issue Type: Bug Components: accounting, specialpurpose/ecommerce Affects Versions: Release Branch 11.04 Reporter: Kiran Gawde If the accounting is turned on and you perform checkout, you get following security error: Security Error: To run createAcctgTransAndEntries you must have the one of the following permissions: ACCTG_ATX_CREATE, ACCTG_ATX_ADMIN. This issue doesn't happen on trunk. So seems someone fixed it on trunk. But I am unable to locate the defect/fix. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
