Re: In preparation for the first release from 17.12

[Gil Portenseigne]

+1

Regards,

Gil

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:02:18PM +0100, Nicolas Malin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I most in favor to propose two products like :
> 
>     "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" (framework)
> and
>     "Apache OFBiz Full 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)
> 
> For advanced user, they would use the framework only and retrieve wanted
> plugins.
> 
> For discovery, the full version would be available and recommended.
> 
> I don't think that publish plugins alone or each plugin alone would be
> an interest for user
> 
> Nicolas
> 
> On 08/02/2020 11:04, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > based on various threads in this list, the time we will prepare the first
> > release from the 17.12 branch is getting close and, since this is the first
> > one in which the plugins are separated from the framework, there are a
> > few decisions to take.
> >
> > Should we release two products or just one as in the past?
> > Two products mean:
> > "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01"
> > and
> > "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"
> > One product mean"
> > "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)
> >
> > Alternatively, we could publish the two products at different times; first
> > publish "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" and then later in the year
> > publish "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"; if this is going to happen then we
> > could have for example multiple releases of the Plugins based on the same
> > release of the framework.
> >
> > One other option is to release independently each plugin (or the ones that
> > we consider stable enough) rather than all the plugins in one file.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jacopo
> >

pub   RSA 3072/ECF12FF4 2019-12-16 Nicolas Malin 
> sub   RSA 3072/40C9B367 2019-12-16
> 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Re: In preparation for the first release from 17.12

[Swapnil M Mane]

Hi team,

As our users are familiar with one unified application, so
+1 to release "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)

And since the only the framework can be independently used to build any
custom enterprise application
+1 to release "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" (framework)

I don't have any strong opinion on releasing only plugins, fine with
everything we decide as a community, so
0 to "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"


Best regards,
Swapnil M Mane,
ofbiz.apache.org

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:32 PM Nicolas Malin 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I most in favor to propose two products like :
>
> "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" (framework)
> and
> "Apache OFBiz Full 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)
>
> For advanced user, they would use the framework only and retrieve wanted
> plugins.
>
> For discovery, the full version would be available and recommended.
>
> I don't think that publish plugins alone or each plugin alone would be
> an interest for user
>
> Nicolas
>
> On 08/02/2020 11:04, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > based on various threads in this list, the time we will prepare the first
> > release from the 17.12 branch is getting close and, since this is the
> first
> > one in which the plugins are separated from the framework, there are a
> > few decisions to take.
> >
> > Should we release two products or just one as in the past?
> > Two products mean:
> > "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01"
> > and
> > "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"
> > One product mean"
> > "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)
> >
> > Alternatively, we could publish the two products at different times;
> first
> > publish "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" and then later in the year
> > publish "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"; if this is going to happen then
> we
> > could have for example multiple releases of the Plugins based on the same
> > release of the framework.
> >
> > One other option is to release independently each plugin (or the ones
> that
> > we consider stable enough) rather than all the plugins in one file.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jacopo
> >
>

Re: In preparation for the first release from 17.12

[Nicolas Malin]

Hi,

I most in favor to propose two products like :

    "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" (framework)
and
    "Apache OFBiz Full 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)

For advanced user, they would use the framework only and retrieve wanted
plugins.

For discovery, the full version would be available and recommended.

I don't think that publish plugins alone or each plugin alone would be
an interest for user

Nicolas

On 08/02/2020 11:04, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> based on various threads in this list, the time we will prepare the first
> release from the 17.12 branch is getting close and, since this is the first
> one in which the plugins are separated from the framework, there are a
> few decisions to take.
>
> Should we release two products or just one as in the past?
> Two products mean:
> "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01"
> and
> "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"
> One product mean"
> "Apache OFBiz 17.12.01" (framework + plugins)
>
> Alternatively, we could publish the two products at different times; first
> publish "Apache OFBiz Framework 17.12.01" and then later in the year
> publish "Apache OFBiz Plugins 17.12.01"; if this is going to happen then we
> could have for example multiple releases of the Plugins based on the same
> release of the framework.
>
> One other option is to release independently each plugin (or the ones that
> we consider stable enough) rather than all the plugins in one file.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jacopo
>


pEpkey.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Re: GraphQL API for OFBiz

[Pierre Smits]

Hi Girish,

Thank you for making the greater OFBiz community aware of this endeavour. I
welcome such initiatives as it increases the appeal of our main product.
Not only does it increase the appeal of OFBiz for (potential) adopters, but
it may also lead to more parties willing to contribute.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits
*Proud* *contributor* (but without privileges)* of* Apache OFBiz
, since 2008

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
Apache Steve , committer


On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 11:40 AM Girish Vasmatkar <
girish.vasmat...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:

> Hello
>
> I had been working on adding GraphQL support to OFBiz and could come up
> with something that might be of interest to the community. Wanted to gauge
> community's interest on the same.
>
> Essentially, I have first tried to enable GraphQL support such that OFBiz
> is able to server GraphQL queries, mutations and subscriptions as per the
> GraphQL specification (http://spec.graphql.org/). The Java GraphQL library
> mostly takes care of it.
>
> The other major part is writing GraphQL schema and I have tried to include
> both SDL and programmatic approach to generate the schema. Included a demo
> query in the SDL approach to showcase hw OFBiz can server GraphQL requests.
>
> This is the part that I feel needs more work in order to make it more
> generalised and I am still working on this.
>
> I have included GraphiQL(https://github.com/graphql/graphiql) and
> Playground (https://github.com/prisma-labs/graphql-playground) as two
> visual editor tools as well.
>
> Here's the github link for the plug in.
> https://github.com/hotwax/ofbiz-graphql
>
> Any feedback, questions, concerns or suggestions are welcome.
>
> Best,
> Girish
>

GraphQL API for OFBiz

[Girish Vasmatkar]

Hello

I had been working on adding GraphQL support to OFBiz and could come up
with something that might be of interest to the community. Wanted to gauge
community's interest on the same.

Essentially, I have first tried to enable GraphQL support such that OFBiz
is able to server GraphQL queries, mutations and subscriptions as per the
GraphQL specification (http://spec.graphql.org/). The Java GraphQL library
mostly takes care of it.

The other major part is writing GraphQL schema and I have tried to include
both SDL and programmatic approach to generate the schema. Included a demo
query in the SDL approach to showcase hw OFBiz can server GraphQL requests.

This is the part that I feel needs more work in order to make it more
generalised and I am still working on this.

I have included GraphiQL(https://github.com/graphql/graphiql) and
Playground (https://github.com/prisma-labs/graphql-playground) as two
visual editor tools as well.

Here's the github link for the plug in.
https://github.com/hotwax/ofbiz-graphql

Any feedback, questions, concerns or suggestions are welcome.

Best,
Girish

Re: Please add me as an Apache OfBiz Contributor

[Pierre Smits]

Welcome Sebastian,

You become a contributor to this project when you submit your first
contribution. No need to ask to be accepted.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits
*Proud* *contributor* (but without privileges)* of* Apache OFBiz
, since 2008

*Apache Trafodion , Vice President*
*Apache Directory , PMC Member*
Apache Incubator , committer
Apache Steve , committer


On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 9:45 AM Sebastian Berg 
wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> I would like to ask you to add me as an Apache OFBiz Contributor.
> My Confluence username is: sberg
>
> Thanks and kind regards,
> Sebastian
>
>

Please add me as an Apache OfBiz Contributor

[Sebastian Berg]

Hello everyone,

I would like to ask you to add me as an Apache OFBiz Contributor.
My Confluence username is: sberg

Thanks and kind regards,
Sebastian