Claudio,
It is NO annotation processor, "server-core-ext" framework takes care of much
of the boilerplate code, and an example of that can be found here
https://github.com/apache/olingo-odata4/blob/master/lib/server-core-ext/src/test/java/org/apache/olingo/server/example/TripPinServiceTest.java
Original thought was to add-on annotation processor but that never got
materialized.
Ramesh..
- Original Message -
> Hi Claudio,
>
> there is currently no Annotation Processor for V4. An approach that does not
> require this much boilerplate code is the Olingo OData Server Extension for
> Java. You can find the JARs on the download page:
> http://olingo.apache.org/doc/odata4/download.html
> Unfortunately I am not aware of documentation regarding this extension.
>
> If you would like to contribute an Annotation approach please have a look at
> our contribution guide: http://olingo.apache.org/contribute.html
>
> Thanks & Best Regards,
> Christian
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Claudio Mauri [mailto:claudio.ma...@limontainformatica.it]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 30. November 2016 09:48
> To: dev@olingo.apache.org
> Subject: Olingo V4 Java Annotation Processor ?
>
> First of all, sorry if I'm writing to the wrong mailing list, but I presume
> that my question may be answered only by developers of the framework..
>
> When I started studying Olingo V4 (I've entirely skipped V2 version) I've
> got the feeling that the library itself is very powerful, but requires
> really a lot of boilerplate code to work with.
>
> So, I started to adapt the Tutorial provided on Apache Olingo web site (for
> version 4) to create an equivalent of the DemoEntityProcessor that would be
> able to work with annotated POJO and to call internally an implementation of
> a custom "service" to perform crud operations Only to realize after that
> is exactly what Olingo V2 Java Annotation processor does !
> Unluckily, I found no documentation about something similar for Olingo V4.
> So, is there something similar already available - or, at least, planned -
> for V4 too ? Of course I would by far prefer to use an "official"
> implementation of an annotation processor instead of trying to write it
> myself (with few chances to succeed...)
>
> Thanks for your time and sorry if I bothered you.
>
> All the bests,
>
> Claudio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
