Insert command
Hello, The explanation for insert command is not clear to me. If I call insert for a document, then I'll have to set the InputStream to to existing document. What happens If I call insert for a folder? Also, if the object specified by path doesnt exist on the repository, what kind of error should be raised? I mean the XContentIdentifer points to a location that doesnt exist, what kind of exception must be thrown? -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani
Re: Insert command
On 6/21/13 8:05 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello, The explanation for insert command is not clear to me. If I call insert for a document, then I'll have to set the InputStream to to existing document. What happens If I call insert for a folder? you create a folder Also, if the object specified by path doesnt exist on the repository, what kind of error should be raised? I mean the XContentIdentifer points to a location that doesnt exist, what kind of exception must be thrown? you should create it and only in case of an error you handle the error appropriately and return back to the UCB. In general you can open, edit and save document and folders, can create new document and can delete document, rename document/folder, basic file operations and all should be supported. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: PROPOSE Release Blocker: Re: Problem with Search function on 4.0
On 20.06.2013 21:33, RGB ES wrote: 2013/6/20 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:04 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/6/20 Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net Confirmed on: AOO400m1(Build:9700) 2013-05-07 14:38:38 (Tue, 07 May 2013) - Linux x86_64 NB: same with the Find toolbar. Indeed. I filled this issue: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122567 This is a really problematic issue, IMO. This is a duplicate of bug 122880, which already has a request for release blocker flag. That bug has also already a proposed patch. -Andre I've set the Release Blocker ? flag. +1. Ricardo -Rob Regards Ricardo Hagar Le 20/06/2013 20:32, RGB ES a écrit : I need someone to confirm a problem before doing a report. Open a new Writer document and type Text, text, TEXT Now press Ctrl-F to activate the search tool. Be sure that match case is NOT selected and search for text: the tool will only find the second word, ignoring the first and third ones as if match case were selected. This in on the ES build: AOO400m2(Build:9701) - Rev. 1493305 2013-06-15 03:58:54 (Sat, 15 Jun 2013) - Linux x86_64 Regards Ricardo --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Triage for AOO 4.0.0 Release Blockers
On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote: Yes. please allow to share the following objections: 1. in general, bugs shouldn't be rated I disagree here and you always rate issues starting with setting a priority. And as always you can't fix them all with a fix number of developers. It simply doesn't work. That means you have to prioritize and that is quite normal. 2. most are crashes - release blocker can be other than crash - i.e. copy chart from Calc into Writer results in chart area without curve. this is a huge bug that doesn't involve a crash exactly and we have defined some criteria for issues, crashes, data loss and security issues have always high priority. Regressions are also very important especially when often used functionality is broken. It is documented in the wiki but I haven't the reference in place yet, have to look for it. 3. with all the respect to Norwegian users, print dialog too wide is a negligible problem not for this specific user group and the fix is already available. 4. there should be a documented evidence to the bug evaluation process, based on approved SOP I am not sure if I understand you here 5. the general public has no declared release date - no need to rush as there is no commitment to fulfill no but the project have committed to a release date and I believe the majority of the community support the new release. You have to set a date and have define what is important for this date. You can always do more and can fix more issues but that won't work very well. 6. minor bugs should also get attention and be targeted definitely but not short in front of a release. And of course nobody prevent anybody from fixing such issues. We have a lot of them, many are probably not longer valid and can be closed, other are not easy to fix and so on. A good start would be of course to simply check older issues if they are still valid or not. 7. the judgment of introducing the sidebar with so many pending bugs should be justified to demonstrate openness as far as I know we haven't pending bugs here. Don't mix this up with improvement or feature requests. Maybe I don't understand you and you can explain it again 8. RTF is rarely used today - no reason for two appearances in the list RTF is as far as I known relevant for Ms interoperability in general and important for other MS filters as well. Even the pure format is not used often the functionality is important. If somebody knows more please correct me. 9. Are there no critical bugs in Math, Draw and Base? probably yes and probably many other critical bugs in other areas that are not detected yet or not proposed as showstopper 10. Are there enough volunteers to treat these release blockers on time? we hope we can fix them all but volunteers are never enough ;-) If you think that other issue should be showstopper as well, please propose them on the dev list and we can discuss them. That's the way how we want to handle it Further discussion should take place on the dev list Juergen Thank you On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 18:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, Any objections to mark these issues as release blocker? [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=120250%20120443%20120513%20120559%20121008%20121143%20121256%20121435%20121479%20121751%20121925%20121968%20121977%20122163%20122300%20121772list_id=68303 Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Translation] Reference to Symphony?
On 20.06.2013 22:00, Andrea Pescetti wrote: RGB ES wrote: 2013/6/20 FR web forumooofo...@free.fr https://translate.apache.org/fr/aoo40help/translate.html#unit=15551192 Is it correct? AFAIK, several icons on the sidebar comes from Symphony's sidebar. Maybe the path just reflects the picture origin. Indeed. It's just an internal pathname, invisible to the end user, to be left untranslated. See http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/trunk/main/default_images/sfx2/res/symphony/ I used this during implementation of the sidebar to be able to easily distinguish between AOO and Symphony icons. A symphony/ directory exists for other modules as well. With the implementation being finished the content of the symphony/ directories an be integrated into its parent directory. This, however, is a very low-priority task. -Andre Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Problem with Search function on 4.0
On 20.06.2013 21:04, RGB ES wrote: 2013/6/20 Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net Confirmed on: AOO400m1(Build:9700) 2013-05-07 14:38:38 (Tue, 07 May 2013) - Linux x86_64 NB: same with the Find toolbar. Indeed. I filled this issue: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122567 This is a really problematic issue, IMO. I said this in another thread already but want to make sure that you don't miss it: this is a duplicate of the already existing bug 121880. That bug does already have a patch and requested release blocker flag. -Andre Regards Ricardo Hagar Le 20/06/2013 20:32, RGB ES a écrit : I need someone to confirm a problem before doing a report. Open a new Writer document and type Text, text, TEXT Now press Ctrl-F to activate the search tool. Be sure that match case is NOT selected and search for text: the tool will only find the second word, ignoring the first and third ones as if match case were selected. This in on the ES build: AOO400m2(Build:9701) - Rev. 1493305 2013-06-15 03:58:54 (Sat, 15 Jun 2013) - Linux x86_64 Regards Ricardo --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Insert command
Hello Juergen, I mean if getPropertyValues is requested for non-existing content what is the exception that must be thrown? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 6/21/13 8:05 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello, The explanation for insert command is not clear to me. If I call insert for a document, then I'll have to set the InputStream to to existing document. What happens If I call insert for a folder? you create a folder Also, if the object specified by path doesnt exist on the repository, what kind of error should be raised? I mean the XContentIdentifer points to a location that doesnt exist, what kind of exception must be thrown? you should create it and only in case of an error you handle the error appropriately and return back to the UCB. In general you can open, edit and save document and folders, can create new document and can delete document, rename document/folder, basic file operations and all should be supported. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani
Re: Insert command
On 6/21/13 9:09 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello Juergen, I mean if getPropertyValues is requested for non-existing content what is the exception that must be thrown? I have to check the code of another UCP to say it exactly, I can't remember for sure... But the UCP handles or communicate errors via exceptions, don't ask me why. Have you checked the exceptions and error codes (enums) on http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/ucb/module-ix.html? Juergen On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 6/21/13 8:05 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello, The explanation for insert command is not clear to me. If I call insert for a document, then I'll have to set the InputStream to to existing document. What happens If I call insert for a folder? you create a folder Also, if the object specified by path doesnt exist on the repository, what kind of error should be raised? I mean the XContentIdentifer points to a location that doesnt exist, what kind of exception must be thrown? you should create it and only in case of an error you handle the error appropriately and return back to the UCB. In general you can open, edit and save document and folders, can create new document and can delete document, rename document/folder, basic file operations and all should be supported. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Triage for AOO 4.0.0 Release Blockers
Hi, On 21.06.2013 08:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote: Yes. please allow to share the following objections: 1. in general, bugs shouldn't be rated I disagree here and you always rate issues starting with setting a priority. And as always you can't fix them all with a fix number of developers. It simply doesn't work. That means you have to prioritize and that is quite normal. 2. most are crashes - release blocker can be other than crash - i.e. copy chart from Calc into Writer results in chart area without curve. this is a huge bug that doesn't involve a crash exactly and we have defined some criteria for issues, crashes, data loss and security issues have always high priority. Regressions are also very important especially when often used functionality is broken. It is documented in the wiki but I haven't the reference in place yet, have to look for it. 3. with all the respect to Norwegian users, print dialog too wide is a negligible problem not for this specific user group and the fix is already available. 4. there should be a documented evidence to the bug evaluation process, based on approved SOP I am not sure if I understand you here 5. the general public has no declared release date - no need to rush as there is no commitment to fulfill no but the project have committed to a release date and I believe the majority of the community support the new release. You have to set a date and have define what is important for this date. You can always do more and can fix more issues but that won't work very well. 6. minor bugs should also get attention and be targeted definitely but not short in front of a release. And of course nobody prevent anybody from fixing such issues. We have a lot of them, many are probably not longer valid and can be closed, other are not easy to fix and so on. A good start would be of course to simply check older issues if they are still valid or not. 7. the judgment of introducing the sidebar with so many pending bugs should be justified to demonstrate openness as far as I know we haven't pending bugs here. Don't mix this up with improvement or feature requests. Maybe I don't understand you and you can explain it again 8. RTF is rarely used today - no reason for two appearances in the list RTF is as far as I known relevant for Ms interoperability in general and important for other MS filters as well. Even the pure format is not used often the functionality is important. If somebody knows more please correct me. Just some more background on the RTF filter: The RTF format is used on copy-and-paste actions between OpenOffice applications and other applications. For example, issue 120023 is caused by a defect in the RTF filter. Best regards, Oliver. 9. Are there no critical bugs in Math, Draw and Base? probably yes and probably many other critical bugs in other areas that are not detected yet or not proposed as showstopper 10. Are there enough volunteers to treat these release blockers on time? we hope we can fix them all but volunteers are never enough ;-) If you think that other issue should be showstopper as well, please propose them on the dev list and we can discuss them. That's the way how we want to handle it Further discussion should take place on the dev list Juergen Thank you On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 18:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, Any objections to mark these issues as release blocker? [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=120250%20120443%20120513%20120559%20121008%20121143%20121256%20121435%20121479%20121751%20121925%20121968%20121977%20122163%20122300%20121772list_id=68303 Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Insert command
On 6/21/13 9:16 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/21/13 9:09 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello Juergen, I mean if getPropertyValues is requested for non-existing content what is the exception that must be thrown? I have to check the code of another UCP to say it exactly, I can't remember for sure... first guess InteractiveIOException but as mentioned before I have to check the code ... But the UCP handles or communicate errors via exceptions, don't ask me why. Have you checked the exceptions and error codes (enums) on http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/ucb/module-ix.html? Juergen On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 6/21/13 8:05 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello, The explanation for insert command is not clear to me. If I call insert for a document, then I'll have to set the InputStream to to existing document. What happens If I call insert for a folder? you create a folder Also, if the object specified by path doesnt exist on the repository, what kind of error should be raised? I mean the XContentIdentifer points to a location that doesnt exist, what kind of exception must be thrown? you should create it and only in case of an error you handle the error appropriately and return back to the UCB. In general you can open, edit and save document and folders, can create new document and can delete document, rename document/folder, basic file operations and all should be supported. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Triage for AOO 4.0.0 Release Blockers
On 21.06.2013 08:57, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/20/13 8:01 PM, Edwin Sharp wrote: Yes. please allow to share the following objections: 1. in general, bugs shouldn't be rated I disagree here and you always rate issues starting with setting a priority. And as always you can't fix them all with a fix number of developers. It simply doesn't work. That means you have to prioritize and that is quite normal. 2. most are crashes - release blocker can be other than crash - i.e. copy chart from Calc into Writer results in chart area without curve. this is a huge bug that doesn't involve a crash exactly and we have defined some criteria for issues, crashes, data loss and security issues have always high priority. Regressions are also very important especially when often used functionality is broken. It is documented in the wiki but I haven't the reference in place yet, have to look for it. 3. with all the respect to Norwegian users, print dialog too wide is a negligible problem not for this specific user group and the fix is already available. 4. there should be a documented evidence to the bug evaluation process, based on approved SOP I am not sure if I understand you here 5. the general public has no declared release date - no need to rush as there is no commitment to fulfill no but the project have committed to a release date and I believe the majority of the community support the new release. You have to set a date and have define what is important for this date. You can always do more and can fix more issues but that won't work very well. 6. minor bugs should also get attention and be targeted definitely but not short in front of a release. And of course nobody prevent anybody from fixing such issues. We have a lot of them, many are probably not longer valid and can be closed, other are not easy to fix and so on. A good start would be of course to simply check older issues if they are still valid or not. 7. the judgment of introducing the sidebar with so many pending bugs should be justified to demonstrate openness I don't understand the second part of the sentence. I have divided the bugs regarding the sidebar into three categories. For each category exists one meta issue: 1. Bugs that have to be fixed for the 4.0 release are covered by issue 121420 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121420) At the moment there are no open bugs blocking it. 2. Bugs that should be addressed after the 4.0 release are marked as blockers of issue 122364 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122364) These are bugs that don't have a big impact on the majority of users or would require a tremendous amount of work to fix them. There are six bugs in this category. 3. Requested enhancements form the third category described by issue 122257 (https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122257). There are 18 feature requests or enhancements. As said above, only bugs in the first category will be fixed for the 4.0 release. At the moment there are no such open bugs. -Andre as far as I know we haven't pending bugs here. Don't mix this up with improvement or feature requests. Maybe I don't understand you and you can explain it again 8. RTF is rarely used today - no reason for two appearances in the list RTF is as far as I known relevant for Ms interoperability in general and important for other MS filters as well. Even the pure format is not used often the functionality is important. If somebody knows more please correct me. 9. Are there no critical bugs in Math, Draw and Base? probably yes and probably many other critical bugs in other areas that are not detected yet or not proposed as showstopper 10. Are there enough volunteers to treat these release blockers on time? we hope we can fix them all but volunteers are never enough ;-) If you think that other issue should be showstopper as well, please propose them on the dev list and we can discuss them. That's the way how we want to handle it Further discussion should take place on the dev list Juergen Thank you On Thu, Jun 20, 2013, at 18:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, Any objections to mark these issues as release blocker? [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=120250%20120443%20120513%20120559%20121008%20121143%20121256%20121435%20121479%20121751%20121925%20121968%20121977%20122163%20122300%20121772list_id=68303 Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
Hello Rob, -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote: Hello, So far we had no one who takes care of updating the web pages in the German community. Meanwhile, a new volunteer has, with Piotr, found that makes this work. However, Piotr needs help commit himself so far that he is not a committer. There was a discussion on this patch on the dev list. I would have cc'de Piotr but he didn't put his full name or contact information in the patch comment. Piotr I will say that he should imagine on the dev list. Ok? There was a concern over the link to the PrOOo-Box website. Some of us (including me) were concerned about putting advertisements like that on an NL homepage. As a non-profit we need to be fair and not promote one 3rd party over another. Rob, that's not to understand the PrOOo box is the OpenOffice CD of the German community for over 8 years. The deutschgen users know this CD. Always all content and changes in PrOOo box in the community were discussed, the content of PrOOo of the community always was approved. We are also very happy to have taken into account all information of Apache, for example, currently a request by Andrea Pescetti and tradema...@apache.org. What is the problem? Where is _this_ discussion? I could not find anything. AND let me say clearly, there is no special link to PrOOo box, there is only one news-Note! AND ... there are MANY, MANY other links to external resources [1], how else should do the website? The PrOOo box is essential for us in Germany, without the PrOOo box, we can not effectively work for end-users because they expect to make a full CD, created by project members. [1] for example: http://www.openoffice.org/de/foren.html and the majority of these links is NOT run by project members - the PrOOo-box, however, is made for more than 8 years of project members from OpenOffice, in the past by members of OOo and current members of the German AOO community! I understand enough German to review patches for the de NL page, but it would be better, of course, to have a native speaker. That's a good idea, I will contact you directly Oliver. (I had hoped would help the Raphael, which was also the suggestion of Marcus (on the German list), but unfortunately, Raphael seems to have no interest.) Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Insert command
Hello Juergen, If I have to create new content, where do I obtain the properties of the content. InsertCommandArgument2 has no attribute to store the content Properties. For example to insert a folder - what is its Title ? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 6/21/13 9:16 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/21/13 9:09 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello Juergen, I mean if getPropertyValues is requested for non-existing content what is the exception that must be thrown? I have to check the code of another UCP to say it exactly, I can't remember for sure... first guess InteractiveIOException but as mentioned before I have to check the code ... But the UCP handles or communicate errors via exceptions, don't ask me why. Have you checked the exceptions and error codes (enums) on http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/ucb/module-ix.html ? Juergen On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: On 6/21/13 8:05 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello, The explanation for insert command is not clear to me. If I call insert for a document, then I'll have to set the InputStream to to existing document. What happens If I call insert for a folder? you create a folder Also, if the object specified by path doesnt exist on the repository, what kind of error should be raised? I mean the XContentIdentifer points to a location that doesnt exist, what kind of exception must be thrown? you should create it and only in case of an error you handle the error appropriately and return back to the UCB. In general you can open, edit and save document and folders, can create new document and can delete document, rename document/folder, basic file operations and all should be supported. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani
Re: Insert command
Hello Juergen, the decription of insert some what makes it clear: This command inserts a new content. It commits the process of // creating a new content via executing the command createNewContent // and initializing it via setting properties, afterwards. // The command is not called on the content which created the new // content, because the new object already knows where it is to be // inserted (i.e. Calling createNewContent with the content type for a // message on a News Group creates a content which internally belongs // to the Outbox. Calling insert on that message will result in // posting the article to the appropriate News Group). Not calling // insert for the new content, i.e. because the user cancels writing // a new message, simply discards the new object. No extra call to // delete is necessary. But what is not clear is suppose there were more than one call to createNewContent. and only one call to insert. whether all the created content must be committed or only a particular content must be committed. how to decide that?/? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Rajath Shashidhara rajaths.raja...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Juergen, If I have to create new content, where do I obtain the properties of the content. InsertCommandArgument2 has no attribute to store the content Properties. For example to insert a folder - what is its Title ? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 6/21/13 9:16 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/21/13 9:09 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello Juergen, I mean if getPropertyValues is requested for non-existing content what is the exception that must be thrown? I have to check the code of another UCP to say it exactly, I can't remember for sure... first guess InteractiveIOException but as mentioned before I have to check the code ... But the UCP handles or communicate errors via exceptions, don't ask me why. Have you checked the exceptions and error codes (enums) on http://www.openoffice.org/api/docs/common/ref/com/sun/star/ucb/module-ix.html ? Juergen On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.comwrote: On 6/21/13 8:05 AM, Rajath Shashidhara wrote: Hello, The explanation for insert command is not clear to me. If I call insert for a document, then I'll have to set the InputStream to to existing document. What happens If I call insert for a folder? you create a folder Also, if the object specified by path doesnt exist on the repository, what kind of error should be raised? I mean the XContentIdentifer points to a location that doesnt exist, what kind of exception must be thrown? you should create it and only in case of an error you handle the error appropriately and return back to the UCB. In general you can open, edit and save document and folders, can create new document and can delete document, rename document/folder, basic file operations and all should be supported. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani -- Rajath S, M.Sc(Hons.) Physics, Birla Institute of Technology and Science - Pilani, Pilani
Re: Triage for AOO 4.0.0 Release Blockers
On 20.06.2013 17:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 06.06.2013 13:54, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi All, Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field is beside the importance field, in a bug form). We hope to get the vote score this week, any bugs you think most critical to you, please bring out and let's discuss. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%3Fsharer_id=249289list_id=64740 [2] Also attach the file for the list (AOO4.0.0_release_blocker_candidates.ods) Armin, Jürgen, Andre and myself reviewed in the last days the list of issues which had been requested for release blocker (release blocker flag = '?') and are not solved. We propose the following issues as release blockers [1]: - 120250 Bug 120250 can be removed from this list, it is now fixed. -Andre - 120443 (actually 121772 - 120443 is a dup. of this one) - 120513 - 120559 - 121008 - 121143 - 121256 - 121435 - 121479 - 121751 - 121925 - 121968 - 121977 - 122163 - 122300 Any objections to mark these issues as release blocker? [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=120250%20120443%20120513%20120559%20121008%20121143%20121256%20121435%20121479%20121751%20121925%20121968%20121977%20122163%20122300%20121772list_id=68303 Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.0.0_release_blocker granted: [Bug 121880] Find and Replace fails unless case is matched
j...@apache.org has granted fanyuz...@gmail.com's request for 4.0.0_release_blocker: Bug 121880: Find and Replace fails unless case is matched https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121880 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org set showstopper flag - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote: Hello Rob, -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2013 7:28 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Jörg Schmidt Subject: Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote: Hello, So far we had no one who takes care of updating the web pages in the German community. Meanwhile, a new volunteer has, with Piotr, found that makes this work. However, Piotr needs help commit himself so far that he is not a committer. There was a discussion on this patch on the dev list. I would have cc'de Piotr but he didn't put his full name or contact information in the patch comment. Piotr I will say that he should imagine on the dev list. Ok? Thanks. There was a concern over the link to the PrOOo-Box website. Some of us (including me) were concerned about putting advertisements like that on an NL homepage. As a non-profit we need to be fair and not promote one 3rd party over another. Rob, that's not to understand the PrOOo box is the OpenOffice CD of the German community for over 8 years. The deutschgen users know this CD. Always all content and changes in PrOOo box in the community were discussed, the content of PrOOo of the community always was approved. We are also very happy to have taken into account all information of Apache, for example, currently a request by Andrea Pescetti and tradema...@apache.org. This isn't a trademark issue. What is the problem? The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product. The website says it is from Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..: http://www.prooo-box.org/ Of course, this doesn't mean it is a bad thing. Personally I think it is wonderful that this exists. Just like I'm happy to see winPenPack version of AOO. But these are still 3rd party distributions. And since they are third party distributions, from other organizations, we need to be careful in how we refer to them on our website. The practice we've adopted for this is to list such distributions (and ports) on a special page: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ The ensures fairness. Everyone wants placement on the front page of the website. We get requests (to the private list) from companies on a regular basis begging us to partner with them and looking for a mention on the website. We refuse them every time. So a good solution would be to have a page that mentions all 3rd party distributions of AOO and has a disclaimer like we have on the /porting page: The following list of third-party party ports and distributions is made available as a service to the community. The Apache OpenOffice project does not officially endorse or maintain these packages So we are fair and we don't give special prominence to any single 3rd party distribution. We don't have favorites or special relations with 3rd parties. But once we have a page that lists all 3rd party distributions, then we can promote that page on the home page. Another solution would be to create the CD (the ISO image) as an official publication of the project, and have it be reviewed and approved by the PMC. That would require additional work, reviewing the license and notice of the additional material, checking in the source of the artwork, etc. But if approved for release it would get far greater attention, and could be linked to right from our main download page. Where is _this_ discussion? I could not find anything. AND let me say clearly, there is no special link to PrOOo box, there is only one news-Note! AND ... there are MANY, MANY other links to external resources [1], how else should do the website? The PrOOo box is essential for us in Germany, without the PrOOo box, we can not effectively work for end-users because they expect to make a full CD, created by project members. [1] for example: http://www.openoffice.org/de/foren.html This isn't the de homepage. Material on the homepage has special prominence and is seen as being official. and the majority of these links is NOT run by project members - the PrOOo-box, however, is made for more than 8 years of project members from OpenOffice, in the past by members of OOo and current members of the German AOO community! winPenPack is old 8 years old. But we do not link to it from our homepage. In any case I hope the issue is clear here and no one turns this into another Rob is oppressing the masses argument. Regards, -Rob I understand enough German to review patches for the de NL page, but it would be better, of course, to have a native speaker. That's a good idea, I will contact you directly Oliver. (I had hoped would help the Raphael, which was also the suggestion of Marcus (on the German list), but
Re: Triage for AOO 4.0.0 Release Blockers
On 20.06.2013 17:09, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, On 06.06.2013 13:54, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi All, Here is the list of identified candidates[1]/[2] which are proposed to be 4.0.0 release blockers. Please indicate your selections for release blockers by giving 1 vote to 1 bug (the vote field is beside the importance field, in a bug form). We hope to get the vote score this week, any bugs you think most critical to you, please bring out and let's discuss. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=doremremaction=runnamedcmd=4.0.0_release_blocker%3Fsharer_id=249289list_id=64740 [2] Also attach the file for the list (AOO4.0.0_release_blocker_candidates.ods) Armin, Jürgen, Andre and myself reviewed in the last days the list of issues which had been requested for release blocker (release blocker flag = '?') and are not solved. We propose the following issues as release blockers [1]: - 120250 - 120443 (actually 121772 - 120443 is a dup. of this one) - 120513 - 120559 - 121008 - 121143 - 121256 121256 can also be removed because it got fixed in the meantime. - 121435 - 121479 - 121751 - 121925 - 121968 - 121977 - 122163 - 122300 Any objections to mark these issues as release blocker? [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=120250%20120443%20120513%20120559%20121008%20121143%20121256%20121435%20121479%20121751%20121925%20121968%20121977%20122163%20122300%20121772list_id=68303 Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: PROPOSE Release Blocker: Re: Problem with Search function on 4.0
2013/6/21 Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com On 20.06.2013 21:33, RGB ES wrote: 2013/6/20 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:04 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote: 2013/6/20 Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net Confirmed on: AOO400m1(Build:9700) 2013-05-07 14:38:38 (Tue, 07 May 2013) - Linux x86_64 NB: same with the Find toolbar. Indeed. I filled this issue: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122567https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122567 This is a really problematic issue, IMO. This is a duplicate of bug 122880, which already has a request for release blocker flag. That bug has also already a proposed patch. Good to know! (about the patch, I mean: confirm my poor skills on searching bugzilla issues is a bad new for me... ;) Regards Ricardo -Andre I've set the Release Blocker ? flag. +1. Ricardo -Rob Regards Ricardo Hagar Le 20/06/2013 20:32, RGB ES a écrit : I need someone to confirm a problem before doing a report. Open a new Writer document and type Text, text, TEXT Now press Ctrl-F to activate the search tool. Be sure that match case is NOT selected and search for text: the tool will only find the second word, ignoring the first and third ones as if match case were selected. This in on the ES build: AOO400m2(Build:9701) - Rev. 1493305 2013-06-15 03:58:54 (Sat, 15 Jun 2013) - Linux x86_64 Regards Ricardo --** --**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**a**pache.orghttp://apache.org dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --**--** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[QA][Test Report] Weekly Status Update as of 20130621
Hi All, We wrap up the AOO 4.0 Full Regression test this week, here is the weekly update (6/17 - 6/21): *Test execution:* 1. Testing of silent installation on Windows, it is passed in WinXP while failed in Win7 Bug 122560 - msiexec installation only possible with parameter /i 2. Full/Final Regression test We have assigned 1804 (last week 1732) text executions to about 20 volunteers, and completed about 64% in execution (1150 test executions done). We will retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed *Defect summary:* 1. 4.0.0 release blocker candidate defects have been reviewed done, results from Hamburg team and Beijing QA team have been combined by Oliver(thanks) - 15 proposed release blocker 2. Silent installation defect (Bug 122560 - msiexec installation only possible with parameter /i) is opened recently, it's a critical problem that AOO does not allow administrators to deploy AOO as they need - propose to add it in release block list * Issues quality highlight:* 1. The problem of silent installation on Windows is not a new problem to 4.0, it is seen in a 3.4.1 2. The triage of bugs for AOO 4.0.0 release blockers is ongoing with a proposed list 3. QAs are reminded to retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed * Volunteer status: * 1. No new volunteers(total 20 so far) on test execution work, 3 person ask for more as they have completed their assignment 2. No new volunteers(total 6 so far) on defect work, the work on confirming defects is closed for now, as we have identified the show stopper issues for AOO 4.0 3. No volunteers on Base/Draw exploration test, we have execution gap here * Plan for next week:* 1. Prepare test env for Base exploration test - Platform (VM for RHEL) and Database (DB2, ..) 2. Work with volunteers to verify defects with severity as blocker or critical (total 84) 3. Work with development to prioritize critical defects as 4.0.0 release blockers 4. Retest the failed/blocked test executions as the defects get fixed Thanks you all for effort this week, let's continue and make progress next week! Regards, Yu Zhen
[ANNOUNCEMENT] Javadoc HTML frame injection vulnerability and AOO SDK
We've published a security bulletin and patch for the Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 SDK. Due to a flaw in JavaDoc generated API documentation, one of the files in the 3.4.1 SDK is vulnerable to an HTML frame injection attack. Details on the issue, and a patched HTML file, can be found here: http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2013-1571.html Note: this impacts only installations of the SDK. Normal end-user installs of Apache OpenOffice are not impacted. Regards, Rob Weir Apache OpenOffice Security Team - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
Hello, From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] What is the problem? The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product. The website says it is from Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..: No, this is absolutely *not* true! The Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. is NOT the creator of the PrOOo-box, but that's us (Detlef, Jan and I) three members of the AOO-Community in Germany. You can see my entry here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Directory+of+Volunteers and I can gladly Jan and Detlef ask to register there. The Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V. is the *only* one who pays us the hosting of the Box (850 euros per year). *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?* But these are still 3rd party distributions. No, this is the Box of german Members of the AOO-Community! But that is not the problem, because the question is a Others, namely how we can make local work on AOO when we can not even provide information users need? A notice in a news-teaser is anyway only a temporary entry. What is the problem? Rob, you have, tell me here on the list, the following: * it's okay to get involved locally for AOO and Apache welcomes such activities * I should self make a choice However, I live in Germany, and here I know the OpenOffice users for more than 8 years, and I know what users need for assistance. And we all have to do something otherwise AOO lost in Germany. Sorry, but that *is* the truth. So we are fair and we don't give special prominence to any single 3rd party distribution. But that is *not* what is needed. There shall be *no* permanent link, but only a *temporary* news-teaser. This teaser is automatically replaced by someone else, as soon as there are new news. What is the problem? Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
Hi Rob, I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly. I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... But on the other hand the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. isn't any old third party. It's a charitable german entity supporting Free office software. It's still supporting Apache OpenOffice. The computer an the monitor at our Fosdem stand were provided by Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... Disclaimer: I'm no member of that club, but know persons who are. So IMO it's ok to put that news in the news line of the homepage, making clear, who's the distributor of that product. Regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote: Hello, From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] What is the problem? The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product. The website says it is from Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..: No, this is absolutely *not* true! The Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. is NOT the creator of the PrOOo-box, but that's us (Detlef, Jan and I) three members of the AOO-Community in Germany. You can see my entry here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Directory+of+Volunteers and I can gladly Jan and Detlef ask to register there. I know who you are. That is not the issue here. The Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V. is the *only* one who pays us the hosting of the Box (850 euros per year). *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?* But these are still 3rd party distributions. No, this is the Box of german Members of the AOO-Community! And Members of the AOO-Community are not the same as the Apache OpenOffice project. So they are third parties. Otherwise we run into absurdities, like Members of IBM (who are also member of the project) getting together asking to host links to Symphony on the www.openoffice.org homepage. But that is not the problem, because the question is a Others, namely how we can make local work on AOO when we can not even provide information users need? A notice in a news-teaser is anyway only a temporary entry. What is the problem? I'm sorry what I said was not clear. Maybe someone else can explain it better. Rob, you have, tell me here on the list, the following: * it's okay to get involved locally for AOO and Apache welcomes such activities * I should self make a choice However, I live in Germany, and here I know the OpenOffice users for more than 8 years, and I know what users need for assistance. And we all have to do something otherwise AOO lost in Germany. Sorry, but that *is* the truth. This is all fine. We just need to be clear what is a product of Apache, and what is done by 3rd parties, even 3rd parties who are also members of the project. And for 3rd parties we must treat their products specially.And one area we need to be careful about is how we advertise 3rd party products on the website. So we are fair and we don't give special prominence to any single 3rd party distribution. But that is *not* what is needed. There shall be *no* permanent link, but only a *temporary* news-teaser. This teaser is automatically replaced by someone else, as soon as there are new news. What is the problem? Advertising 3rd party products on the homepage. -Rob Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Peter Junge peter.ju...@gmx.org wrote: On 6/21/2013 9:59 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote: Hello, From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] What is the problem? The CD is not from the Apache OpenOffice project. It was not reviewed and approved for release by the project. It is a 3rd party product. The website says it is from Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V..: No, this is absolutely *not* true! The Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. is NOT the creator of the PrOOo-box, but that's us (Detlef, Jan and I) three members of the AOO-Community in Germany. You can see my entry here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Directory+of+Volunteers and I can gladly Jan and Detlef ask to register there. The Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V. is the *only* one who pays us the hosting of the Box (850 euros per year). *We would be pleased if the Apache paid. Apache wants to do that?* As far as I understand the Apache way: Apache products must be hosted by Apache infrastructure(*), but as the PrOOo-Box certainly contains also non-Apache products it cannot be hosted at Apache. Seems a Catch-22 to me. Does someone has any good idea how to fix this? It would certainly be a good thing to continue the PrOOo-Box within the AOO community. Do you have a list of what non-Apache products are included? There may be something possible here. The AOO install sets, for example, include non-Apache components. But we had to carefully review them for license requirements, and document these licenses and required notices, etc. And this was all decided by a public vote of the PMC. So this may be possible. But it must start with a proposal and discussion on the dev list. So it is good to start this discussion now. -Rob (*) Apache strictly requires to avoid community fragmentation like it had happened with OOo. Best regards Peter But these are still 3rd party distributions. No, this is the Box of german Members of the AOO-Community! But that is not the problem, because the question is a Others, namely how we can make local work on AOO when we can not even provide information users need? A notice in a news-teaser is anyway only a temporary entry. What is the problem? Rob, you have, tell me here on the list, the following: * it's okay to get involved locally for AOO and Apache welcomes such activities * I should self make a choice However, I live in Germany, and here I know the OpenOffice users for more than 8 years, and I know what users need for assistance. And we all have to do something otherwise AOO lost in Germany. Sorry, but that *is* the truth. So we are fair and we don't give special prominence to any single 3rd party distribution. But that is *not* what is needed. There shall be *no* permanent link, but only a *temporary* news-teaser. This teaser is automatically replaced by someone else, as soon as there are new news. What is the problem? Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote: Hi Rob, I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly. I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... But on the other hand the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. isn't any old third party. We need to be fair. Treating one 3rd party special is not fair. It's a charitable german entity supporting Free office software. It's still supporting Apache OpenOffice. The computer an the monitor at our Fosdem stand were provided by Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... Disclaimer: I'm no member of that club, but know persons who are. So IMO it's ok to put that news in the news line of the homepage, making clear, who's the distributor of that product. I'd be much happier if the German community listened to what I am saying and took steps to address the full issue. IMHO you need to add a page that gives equal access to all 3rd party ports and distributions, and not just favor a single one with a news announcement. If you then give announcements of updates to these distributions, whenever they occur, and do such announcements fairly, not for just a single 3rd party, then this might be OK. So if you really want to move this forward I'd highly recommend creating and maintaining a German version of the porting page: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ -Rob Regards Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Build AOO in Win7 Troubles
Thank you, i did it, I've been kind of busy at my job, but this weekend i'm going to be working in the project El jun 14, 2013 11:01 PM, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch escribió: Hi Am 15.06.13 05:43, schrieb Ivan Fuentes: I know i followed all the instructuctions...I could fix that error, Now i got this one: bundling of dictionaries is disabled. This one is not a error, you should be able to continue Greetings Raphael --**--**- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.orgdev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Hello! I'm Piotr!
Hello everybody! I'm Piotr and at this time I help to develop the german AOO Website. I have contributed some changes that Jörg and I talked about in the german mailing list. So if you have any question to me, i am now on the international developer mailing list. greetings Piotr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
2013/6/21 Rob Weir robw...@apache.org On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote: Hi Rob, I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly. I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... But on the other hand the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. isn't any old third party. We need to be fair. Treating one 3rd party special is not fair. +1. An exception never confirms a rule, an exception always break a rule. No matter if we are talking about an old and trusted friend, a third party is always a third party with the same rights and duties of all other third parties. It's a charitable german entity supporting Free office software. It's still supporting Apache OpenOffice. The computer an the monitor at our Fosdem stand were provided by Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... Disclaimer: I'm no member of that club, but know persons who are. So IMO it's ok to put that news in the news line of the homepage, making clear, who's the distributor of that product. I'd be much happier if the German community listened to what I am saying and took steps to address the full issue. IMHO you need to add a page that gives equal access to all 3rd party ports and distributions, and not just favor a single one with a news announcement. If you then give announcements of updates to these distributions, whenever they occur, and do such announcements fairly, not for just a single 3rd party, then this might be OK. So if you really want to move this forward I'd highly recommend creating and maintaining a German version of the porting page: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ +1 again. IMO, this is by far the best solution. All community members deserve the same respect. Regards Ricardo -Rob Regards Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly. I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... No, that's not right! The Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. only pays for web hosting, it has no rights or influence the content. Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote: Hi Rob, I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly. I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... But on the other hand the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. isn't any old third party. We need to be fair. Treating one 3rd party special is not fair. Treating equal things unequal isn't fair, but it's also unfair treating unequal things equal. You have to make the decision, what's equal and whd what's unequa and in what aspect. That's the sense of suum cuique tribuere. It's a charitable german entity supporting Free office software. It's still supporting Apache OpenOffice. The computer an the monitor at our Fosdem stand were provided by Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... Disclaimer: I'm no member of that club, but know persons who are. So IMO it's ok to put that news in the news line of the homepage, making clear, who's the distributor of that product. I'd be much happier if the German community listened to what I am saying and took steps to address the full issue. IMHO you need to add a page that gives equal access to all 3rd party ports and distributions, and not just favor a single one with a news announcement. see above. IMO you like to treat uneqal things equal. Making a page presenting third party products makes sense. But it don't makes sense, presenting all third party products in the news. And it makes IMO sense presenting the box there. If you then give announcements of updates to these distributions, whenever they occur, and do such announcements fairly, not for just a single 3rd party, then this might be OK. So if you really want to move this forward I'd highly recommend creating and maintaining a German version of the porting page: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ Doing one thing doesn't mean to drop another. Regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
Am 21.06.2013 17:35, schrieb Jörg Schmidt: From: RA Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly. I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... No, that's not right! The Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. only pays for web hosting, it has no rights or influence the content. Someone is responsible for the box and it semms to me, it's not the ASF. So we have to make clear, who's the legal entity distributing the box (even it's a gift). Regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote: Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote: Hi Rob, I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly. I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... But on the other hand the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. isn't any old third party. We need to be fair. Treating one 3rd party special is not fair. Treating equal things unequal isn't fair, but it's also unfair treating unequal things equal. You have to make the decision, what's equal and whd what's unequa and in what aspect. That's the sense of suum cuique tribuere. My recollection of the discussion was. (1) Have a 3rd party page. (2) Each language may have their own 3rd party page. (3) Each language can have their own news feed. (4) Each news item may link to a 3rd party page. Conclusion. DE page can have news about PrOOo and point to a link on the 3rd party page. Do we all agree? Regards, Dave It's a charitable german entity supporting Free office software. It's still supporting Apache OpenOffice. The computer an the monitor at our Fosdem stand were provided by Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... Disclaimer: I'm no member of that club, but know persons who are. So IMO it's ok to put that news in the news line of the homepage, making clear, who's the distributor of that product. I'd be much happier if the German community listened to what I am saying and took steps to address the full issue. IMHO you need to add a page that gives equal access to all 3rd party ports and distributions, and not just favor a single one with a news announcement. see above. IMO you like to treat uneqal things equal. Making a page presenting third party products makes sense. But it don't makes sense, presenting all third party products in the news. And it makes IMO sense presenting the box there. If you then give announcements of updates to these distributions, whenever they occur, and do such announcements fairly, not for just a single 3rd party, then this might be OK. So if you really want to move this forward I'd highly recommend creating and maintaining a German version of the porting page: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ Doing one thing doesn't mean to drop another. Regards Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On Jun 21, 2013, at 9:40 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann wrote: Am 21.06.2013 17:06, schrieb Rob Weir: On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 10:56 AM, RA Stehmann anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de wrote: Hi Rob, I can understand your concerns, but they aren't drasticly. I'm with you, that we have to make clear, the Box isn't a product of the ASF but distributed by the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... But on the other hand the Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V.. isn't any old third party. We need to be fair. Treating one 3rd party special is not fair. Treating equal things unequal isn't fair, but it's also unfair treating unequal things equal. You have to make the decision, what's equal and whd what's unequa and in what aspect. That's the sense of suum cuique tribuere. My recollection of the discussion was. (1) Have a 3rd party page. (2) Each language may have their own 3rd party page. (3) Each language can have their own news feed. (4) Each news item may link to a 3rd party page. Conclusion. DE page can have news about PrOOo and point to a link on the 3rd party page. Do we all agree? I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page directly. That is my understanding, at least. It could say, for example, PrOOo Box now released with support for AOO 3.4.1. See our ports and distributions page for details. That would be fine, IMHO. I think a relevant fact for thinking about this is that there are a number of corporations who contribute money and services to the ASF, in order to keep it operating. But we do not link to them on our home page. Instead we have a separate sponsors page that we use: http://www.apache.org/foundation/thanks.html I've never heard anyone offended by this practice. We're not insulting the companies that contribute to help the ASF. But we don't put up advertisements for 3rd parties on the homepage as a matter of policy. -Rob Regards, Dave It's a charitable german entity supporting Free office software. It's still supporting Apache OpenOffice. The computer an the monitor at our Fosdem stand were provided by Verein Freies Office Deutschland e.V... Disclaimer: I'm no member of that club, but know persons who are. So IMO it's ok to put that news in the news line of the homepage, making clear, who's the distributor of that product. I'd be much happier if the German community listened to what I am saying and took steps to address the full issue. IMHO you need to add a page that gives equal access to all 3rd party ports and distributions, and not just favor a single one with a news announcement. see above. IMO you like to treat uneqal things equal. Making a page presenting third party products makes sense. But it don't makes sense, presenting all third party products in the news. And it makes IMO sense presenting the box there. If you then give announcements of updates to these distributions, whenever they occur, and do such announcements fairly, not for just a single 3rd party, then this might be OK. So if you really want to move this forward I'd highly recommend creating and maintaining a German version of the porting page: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ Doing one thing doesn't mean to drop another. Regards Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
From: Dr. Michael Stehmann [mailto:anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de] Someone is responsible for the box and it semms to me, it's not the ASF. So we have to make clear, who's the legal entity distributing the box (even it's a gift). The legal entity is, in this case, formally an group consisting of Detlef, Jan and me. (Formally, the person responsible for the website is Jan, and for the DVD it's Detlef.) Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
language of office program
Hi! Can you help me change the language of the entire office program? i just bought this used computer and its all in Spanish Thank you, Kristen
Re: language of office program
On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:28:08 -0600 Kristen Todd hd2m...@gmail.com wrote: Hi! Can you help me change the language of the entire office program? i just bought this used computer and its all in Spanish Thank you, Kristen Download the appropriate Language Pack from http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html and install it. It will change OpenOffice to the new chosen language. -- Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Hello! I'm Piotr!
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Piotr Bala p_b...@me.com wrote: Hello everybody! I'm Piotr and at this time I help to develop the german AOO Website. I have contributed some changes that Jörg and I talked about in the german mailing list. So if you have any question to me, i am now on the international developer mailing list. Thanks, Piotr.I've seen your patches come through for the German website. I wanted to have a contact email in case I (or anyone else) had questions before committing them. As you probably heard, we're discussing PrOOoBox and how to mention it on the website. Regards, -Rob greetings Piotr - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Where to find images for splash screen, about box, etc.?
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 3:33 AM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 11.06.2013 12:56, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: Hi, I just want to mention issue 122331 [1]. It is about a missing logo/image in the first visible dialog on the Windows installation. [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122331 Best regards, Oliver. On 11.06.2013 10:38, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: On 6/11/13 9:58 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: On 10.06.2013 19:15, Rob Weir wrote: Where in the SVN tree can I find the images used for these three areas of OpenOffice where the logo is displayed: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO4+-+Application+And+Launcher We're trying to determine the dimensions and formats needed for the updated logo. Splash Screen: main/default_images/introabout/intro.png Start Screen: There are two parts, left side and right side. These exist in both regular and high-contrast version as well as regular and right-to-left. That makes eight images in total: main/default_images/framework/res/backing.png (left side, regular, left-to-right) main/default_images/framework/res/backing_right.png(right side, regular, left-to-right) main/default_images/framework/res/backing_hc.png (left side, high contrast, left-to-right) main/default_images/framework/res/backing_right_hc.png (right side, high contrast, left-to-right) main/default_images/framework/res/backing_rtl_left.png (left side, regular, right-to-left) main/default_images/framework/res/backing_rtl_right.png (right side, regular, right-to-left) main/default_images/framework/res/backing_rtl_left_hc.png (left side, high contrast, right-to-left) main/default_images/framework/res/backing_rtl_right_hc.png (right side, high contrast, right-to-left) The space between the left and right sides is filled with the images but these are basically empty (just background and shadow) and probably will not have to be modified. The shadow is very important here and is not seen directly, at least I missed it the first time I modified the image. main/default_images/framework/res/backing_space.png (center, regular) main/default_images/framework/res/backing_space_hc.png (center, high contrast) About Screen: main/default_images/introabout/about.png Other: Some other images that I stumbled upon while searching for those above. The current logo as 256x256 png: main/default_images/introabout/logo.png A really old logo (6 frames of an animation): main/default_images/sfx2/res/an01.png ...an06.png Some more images used for the Windows setup or Mac dmg main/instsetoo_native/res/nologoinstall.bmp main/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/windows/msi_templates/Binary/Banner.bmp main/instsetoo_native/inc_openoffice/windows/msi_templates/Binary/Image.bmp main/instsetoo_native/inc_ooolangpack/windows/msi_templates/Binary/Banner.bmp main/instsetoo_native/inc_ooolangpack/windows/msi_templates/Binary/Image.bmp main/instsetoo_native/inc_sdkoo/windows/msi_templates/Binary/Banner.bmp main/instsetoo_native/inc_sdkoo/windows/msi_templates/Binary/Image.bmp main/setup_native/source/mac/ooo/osxdndinstall.png main/setup_native/source/mac/ooo/osxdndinstall_nologo.png main/setup_native/source/mac/ooo/osxdndinstall_lang.png main/setup_native/source/mac/ooo3_installer.icns main/setup_native/source/mac/sdk/osxdndinstall.png Especially the setup_native Mac images need later on some further tweaking of the DS_Store files that I will do. While working on issue 122331 I found the following images: main/setup_native/source/win32/nsis/ooobanner.bmp main/setup_native/source/win32/nsis/ooobitmap.bmp main/setup_native/source/win32/nsis/ooosetup.ico main/setup_native/source/win32/nsis/ooosdkbanner.bmp main/setup_native/source/win32/nsis/ooosdkbitmap.bmp main/setup_native/source/win32/nsis/urebanner.bmp main/setup_native/source/win32/nsis/urebitmap.bmp There are used in the different Windows installers. Thanks. I added them to the wiki, along with their sizes: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Product+Logo+Use -Rob Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] My recollection of the discussion was. (1) Have a 3rd party page. (2) Each language may have their own 3rd party page. (3) Each language can have their own news feed. (4) Each news item may link to a 3rd party page. Conclusion. DE page can have news about PrOOo and point to a link on the 3rd party page. In my view, that would be a very aktzeptable solution. Please note: an important part of the solution is that there are language-specific 3rd party pages. Because that is understandable for the local user. Do we all agree? I think the question is only for PMC members, it is not, then by me +1 Greetings, Jorg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page directly. That is my understanding, at least. It could say, for example, PrOOo Box now released with support for AOO 3.4.1. See our ports and distributions page for details. That would be fine, IMHO. Yes, that would be possible. Rob, an honest word: I have taken care that the site is de current, and I know what German users want, _but I knew nothing of item 1 to 4_ (see Dave's mail) ... PLEASE consider that a no from you is a no for me, however, the attempt would help me to find a solution that will meet our (i mean the local German community) requirements for the de-website AND the rules of Apache have been a better way. A little help is sometimes better than just the citing of rules. Understandable? Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[4.0]Wrong cursor positioning when a comment is present on the document
I did not reported this yet. Download this document http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/Test-Bug.odt On pages 3 and 7 you'll see some text highlighted. There is also a comment inserted on page 3. If you click on the yellow text on page 3, the cursor jumps to the heading instead of remaining where you clicked. If you click on the yellow text on page 7 the situation is even worse: the cursor jumps to the footer of previous page. Now, go to page 3 and delete the note: clicking on any yellow text the cursor behave as intended. Also, if with the note in place you delete text under the first heading so the chapter gets reduced to two pages, the jump on page 7 does not occur. The document is new, all styles defined today and created on AOO400m2(Build:9701) - Rev. 1493305 2013-06-15 03:58:54 (Sat, 15 Jun 2013) - Linux x86_64 Can someone confirm this this *really* strange issue? Thanks Regards Ricardo
Re: [4.0]Wrong cursor positioning when a comment is present on the document
2013/6/21 RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com I did not reported this yet. Download this document http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/Test-Bug.odt On pages 3 and 7 you'll see some text highlighted. There is also a comment inserted on page 3. If you click on the yellow text on page 3, the cursor jumps to the heading instead of remaining where you clicked. If you click on the yellow text on page 7 the situation is even worse: the cursor jumps to the footer of previous page. Now, go to page 3 and delete the note: clicking on any yellow text the cursor behave as intended. Also, if with the note in place you delete text under the first heading so the chapter gets reduced to two pages, the jump on page 7 does not occur. The document is new, all styles defined today and created on AOO400m2(Build:9701) - Rev. 1493305 2013-06-15 03:58:54 (Sat, 15 Jun 2013) - Linux x86_64 Can someone confirm this this *really* strange issue? OK, this is getting even more strange: if I hide the sidebar, the problem does not happen... Thanks Regards Ricardo
Re: Can somebody please commit the update of the de-websites
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Jörg Schmidt joe...@j-m-schmidt.de wrote: From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] I assume for #4 that you mean the news feed points to the ASF-hosted page that lists 3rd party distributions, but not to the 3rd party page directly. That is my understanding, at least. It could say, for example, PrOOo Box now released with support for AOO 3.4.1. See our ports and distributions page for details. That would be fine, IMHO. Yes, that would be possible. Rob, an honest word: I have taken care that the site is de current, and I know what German users want, _but I knew nothing of item 1 to 4_ (see Dave's mail) ... PLEASE consider that a no from you is a no for me, however, the attempt would help me to find a solution that will meet our (i mean the local German community) requirements for the de-website AND the rules of Apache have been a better way. A little help is sometimes better than just the citing of rules. Understandable? In my very first post on the topic, I wrote: So one solution discussed was to do similar to what we do with the main English pages with winPenPack. We have a general page for 3rd party ports and distributions: http://www.openoffice.org/porting/ So it might be good to add info about PrOOo-Box to that page. And then if you want, you could translate that entire page, or link to it. That was true then. That is true now. It us unfortunate that it required such a long thread for it sink in. Regards, -Rob Greetings, Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Completed How the Apache OpenOffice Project Works
I am getting error ( accessing your personal settings or your Personal settings are blocked. I am operating windows 7. Can you tel me how to correct this error. Thank you wc...@att.net 615 459-7924 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [4.0]Wrong cursor positioning when a comment is present on the document
Hi, 2013/6/22, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com: 2013/6/21 RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com I did not reported this yet. Download this document http://people.apache.org/~rgb-es/Test-Bug.odt On pages 3 and 7 you'll see some text highlighted. There is also a comment inserted on page 3. If you click on the yellow text on page 3, the cursor jumps to the heading instead of remaining where you clicked. If you click on the yellow text on page 7 the situation is even worse: the cursor jumps to the footer of previous page. Now, go to page 3 and delete the note: clicking on any yellow text the cursor behave as intended. Also, if with the note in place you delete text under the first heading so the chapter gets reduced to two pages, the jump on page 7 does not occur. The document is new, all styles defined today and created on AOO400m2(Build:9701) - Rev. 1493305 2013-06-15 03:58:54 (Sat, 15 Jun 2013) - Linux x86_64 Can someone confirm this this *really* strange issue? OK, this is getting even more strange: if I hide the sidebar, the problem does not happen... I can confirm the strange behaviour on side by side mode (middle icon) when the width of the document window is not wide enough. When the horizontal scrollbar of the document does not have scrollable remaining, the problem not happen on: AOO341m1(Build:9593) - Rev. 1372282 2012-08-13 09:43:38(Mon, 13 Aug 2012) - Linux i686 Regards - Tsutomu Thanks Regards Ricardo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
