Re: ApacheCon Denver, genLang and buildsystem talk.
What a prospect for AOO building system this opens! On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:40 AM, jan i j...@apache.org wrote: Hi For those interested, my presentations around AOO can be found at http://people.apache.org/~jani/genlang.pdf http://people.apache.org/~jani/buildSysAOO.pdf There is a chance that I will present an updated version November in Budapest (ApacheCon Europe). rgds jan I. -- Best Regards, Steve Yin
Re: Bug or not?
Issue 124644 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124644reported. 2014-04-10 7:41 GMT+03:00 Николай Нинков nick...@gmail.com: Ok, maybe I'm not explaining the problem in sufficient detail. Try to do the following: 1. Open the file (the one who sent me or that I sent you, the problem is the same), 2. Edit date in a static format to the actual date or write in another field current date again in a static format, 3. Close the file, 4. Opened it again. It appears that the date in a static format was changed a day ago and the year is much older. Only months does not change. Why this happens? I did not posting this as a bug, because I'm not sure if it's a bug or I messed something. Niki 2014-04-10 1:48 GMT+03:00 Tal Daniel tal.re...@gmail.com: Privet Nikolai, I checked your problem, and the date opens on my AOO 4.0.1 as 9.4. The problem you described could a result of cells with a function to show the date of today (=now()). Please see the attached ODS file, for example of a function to always show today, and a regular date, below it (double-click on cells to see what's under the hood). Next time, try to report issues/problems to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/. Успеха, Tal On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Николай Нинков nick...@gmail.com wrote: Hello everyone, I think I found a bug in AОО, but I'm not sure. I will try to be the most comprehensive in the description. Here's what happened: A few monts ago I created a spreadsheet file with a simple formula to calculate family expenses . The file was created with AOO4.0.1. I installed AOO4.1.0 like new instal for testing the translation and all the rest of tests. At the moment I still conducting tests on AOO4.1.0 . A few days ago I noticed that the column with the date themselves change all the dates when I write new data close and open the file. I checked with antivirus ComodoIS- no problem. I created a copy of the file and delete all the rows from the table , leaving only one , but the problem remains . I need your opinion. This bug AOO4.0 it? My knowledge is not enough to find the cause. I send you attached the file to check on why it happens. If the file is not attached with message here is the link to: http://ecoenergysolutions.bg/razhodi-remont-2.ods Regards Niki - To unsubscribe, e-mail: l10n-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: l10n-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- טל
Re: [Issue 31880] drag and drop from nautilus file manager not functional
On 4/9/14 9:21 PM, Mathias Röllig wrote: Hello! By writing a new issue I found that is was reported 10 years ago in https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=31880 This issue is CLOSED FIXED for OOo2.0. Last comment is Verified in mws src680_m63. But it doesn't work 10 years later. :-( (Ubuntu 10.4, Gnome 2.30) Was it really implemented at any time? If so, what should I do? it's a long time and it depends heavily on external stuff. It is likely that something has changed or broke over time. Submit a new issue if you like Juergen Greetings Mathias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Apply for editing permission of AOO 4.1 发行说明（简体中文）
Hi, I am going to help translate the English version of AOO 4.1 into zh_CN Chinese version. Could you give me the editing permission ? My username is Celine. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Celine
Re: Windows 4.1.0 installer does not remove the startup group icon(empty group) after uninstall
Hi, On 10.04.2014 02:42, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi all, Here are the steps to reproduce this problem, I will check Bugzilla when it recovers to me: 1. Install 4.1.0 RC2 (clean install or upgrade install) 2. Run the installation again and select Remove in Program Maintenance of installation Wizard, and click Next (see screenshot post below) 3. Check startup group after uninstall finish Problem: the startup group OpenOffice 4.1.0 is empty(it is expected) while the group icon still remains Could you please check former OpenOffice version (e.g.: OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0, AOO 4.0.0) as well? Thanks in advance, Oliver. Notes: there is no such problem when uninstall AOO by Windows's uninstaller in Control Panel Empty startup group remains, should be removed - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Apply for editing permission of AOO 4.1 发行说明（简体中文）
lilinuuup wrote: I am going to help translate the English version of AOO 4.1 into zh_CN Chinese version. Could you give me the editing permission ? My username is Celine. Thank you very much. Permission granted. Make sure you work on the translated version and not on the original one (i.e., if a zh_CN version does not exist yet, create it by copying the English page; ask if you have doubts). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599
On 10.04.2014 06:55, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi all, Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in AOO 4.1.0 RC2, from current behaviors and comments provided in this bug, the expected behaviors for upgrade on Windows could be: Good idea. Good text but maybe a native speaker can tweek the wording. -Andre 1. If the former version is 3.x, there will be a check box in Installation Wizard providing the option to keep or remove the former version - If select Remove all older product versions, then 3.x will be removed and 4.x will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for 4.x - If de-select Remove all older product versions, then 4.x will be installed with keeping 3.x, there will be 2 startup groups, 2 desktop icons and 2 entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. These artifacts are one suite for 3.x and the other suite for 4.x 2. If the former version is also 4.x, but older than current installing one(e.g. install 4.1.0 over 4.0.0), then the older one will be removed and the newer one will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for the newer one. I think above behaviors are acceptable, I propose to update the installation instructions [1] according those. Any comments, or any objections? [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26) does not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old version for an upgrade installation. I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when submit the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with details as below: 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc) 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows, Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on Linux and Mac, but need confirmation That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding. You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate! Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit patches which we can review. We could use help from all folks using our installation binaries on this. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599
On 4/8/14, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26) does not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old version for an upgrade installation. I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when submit the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with details as below: 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc) 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows, Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on Linux and Mac, but need confirmation That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding. You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate! Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit patches which we can review. We could use help from all folks using our installation binaries on this. Should this be on d...@openoffice.apache.org? [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.0_release_blocker granted: [Issue 124639] 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing (without error message)
j...@apache.org has granted Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com's request for 4.1.0_release_blocker: Issue 124639: 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing (without error message) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.0_release_blocker requested: [Issue 124617] no export to PDF with 4.1.0 RC
h...@apache.org h...@apache.org has asked for 4.1.0_release_blocker: Issue 124617: no export to PDF with 4.1.0 RC https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124617 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
4.1.0_release_blocker granted: [Issue 124617] no export to PDF with 4.1.0 RC
j...@apache.org has granted h...@apache.org h...@apache.org's request for 4.1.0_release_blocker: Issue 124617: no export to PDF with 4.1.0 RC https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124617 --- Additional Comments from j...@apache.org grant showstopper flag, crash - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
review requested: [Issue 124639] 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing (without error message) : [Attachment 83159] patch to solve the defect
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org has asked for review: Issue 124639: 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing (without error message) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639 Attachment 83159: patch to solve the defect https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=83159action=edit - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: review requested: [Issue 124639] 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing (without error message) : [Attachment 83159] patch to solve the defect
Hi, On 10.04.2014 10:37, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: Oliver-Rainer Wittmann o...@apache.org has asked for review: Issue 124639: 'Paste as GDI Metafile' from WIN Paintbrush pastes nothing (without error message) https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639 Attachment 83159: patch to solve the defect https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=83159action=edit A fix is available as attachment to the issue and as a commit on trunk. Please provide a code review. It is intended to integrate this fix into branch AOO410 for our 4.1.0 release. Best regards, Oliver. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: ApacheCon Denver, genLang and buildsystem talk.
On 4/10/14 5:40 AM, jan i wrote: Hi For those interested, my presentations around AOO can be found at http://people.apache.org/~jani/genlang.pdf do you have any concrete time plan for the integration of genLang in AOOs build env? It would be a huge step forward http://people.apache.org/~jani/buildSysAOO.pdf if the numbers become true I can't wait to see this in practise ;-) But of course I am a little bit skeptical and have many questions in my mind... Anyway nice outlook and I hope we can move on here. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Windows 4.1.0 installer does not remove the startup group icon(empty group) after uninstall
Hi Oliver, It has same problem on AOO 3.4.1, AOO 4.0.0. I am downloading OOo 3.3.0, will check it when I get the installation package. On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann orwittm...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, On 10.04.2014 02:42, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi all, Here are the steps to reproduce this problem, I will check Bugzilla when it recovers to me: 1. Install 4.1.0 RC2 (clean install or upgrade install) 2. Run the installation again and select Remove in Program Maintenance of installation Wizard, and click Next (see screenshot post below) 3. Check startup group after uninstall finish Problem: the startup group OpenOffice 4.1.0 is empty(it is expected) while the group icon still remains Could you please check former OpenOffice version (e.g.: OOo 3.3.0, AOO 3.4.0, AOO 4.0.0) as well? Thanks in advance, Oliver. Notes: there is no such problem when uninstall AOO by Windows's uninstaller in Control Panel Empty startup group remains, should be removed - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: [VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC2)
On 4/9/14 5:20 PM, Rob Weir wrote: On Apr 9, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Jürgen Schmidt jogischm...@gmail.com wrote: We found a new showstopper 124639 and have to prepare a new RC 3. IMHO it would be best if, in such cases, the Release Manager formally propose to end the previous vote. This reinforces the fact that the PMC decides when a vote fails or not. An easy way to do this is to send a note like, I propose to cancel the current vote because insert reasons. If there are no objections the vote is canceled That gives the opportunity for someone to object. In that case the vote would continue. Objection is possible at any time but to me it is clear that we don't want release with existing critical showstopper. And of course we clearly differentiate between issues that are edge cases for one platform only, issues that are reproducible on all platforms and are crashes or regressions or issues less critical but requested as showstopper and where a fix is in place. Juergen -Rob But nevertheless we found several showstopper issues late in RC builds. Even in code that is in the product since December last year. I would like to invite all volunteers to test the current available RC2 more intensive and report potential problems. A new RC 3 build will be prepared later this week. Juergen On 4/8/14 11:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate (RC2) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least 2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A very huge step forward to reach and better support disabled users especially on Windows. The second improvement is the switch to 64 bit on MacOS. A long and overdue must do shift forward to support newer APIs (replace deprecated APIs) and platforms on MacOS. And we can provide again more complete UI translations and have now support for 38 languages. New languages for this release compared to 4.0.1 are Bulgarian, Danish, Hebrew, Hindi, Norwegian Bokmal and Thai. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 will be a further key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. An overview of the integrated release issues can be found under: http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc2/AOO4.1.0_RC2_fixes.html The RC2 fixed 4 further problems: [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id4599 [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id4607 [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id4509 [4] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id4394 The release candidate artifacts (1) (source release, as well as binary releases for 38 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds The RC is based on the release branch AOO410, revision 1585426! And a fresh and clean RAT scan output of this revision can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc2/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 The vote starts now and will be open until: Friday, 11 April: 2014-04-11 11:00am UTC+2. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... (1) the upload for the Linux artifacts is still ongoing, expected to be available in 2-3 hours. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[CANCELED][VOTE]: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 (RC2)
as reported earlier we found additional showstopper that are critical enough to prepare a further RC candidate and start a new vote. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124617 https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124639 and potentially https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124636 I am not sure if it is really a showstopper it is broken since 4.0. Well the related code is sub optimal to say it careful and the behaviour changed indirectly because of other changes. Juergen On 4/8/14 11:00 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi all, this is a call for vote on releasing the available release candidate (RC2) as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 is a minor update with many bugfixes and at least 2 major improvements. It's the first version where we have the iAccessibility2 support integrated and available. A very huge step forward to reach and better support disabled users especially on Windows. The second improvement is the switch to 64 bit on MacOS. A long and overdue must do shift forward to support newer APIs (replace deprecated APIs) and platforms on MacOS. And we can provide again more complete UI translations and have now support for 38 languages. New languages for this release compared to 4.0.1 are Bulgarian, Danish, Hebrew, Hindi, Norwegian Bokmal and Thai. Apache OpenOffice 4.1 will be a further key milestone to continue the success of OpenOffice. An overview of the integrated release issues can be found under: http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc2/AOO4.1.0_RC2_fixes.html The RC2 fixed 4 further problems: [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124599 [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124607 [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124509 [4] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124394 The release candidate artifacts (1) (source release, as well as binary releases for 38 languages) and further information how to verify and review Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 can be found on the following wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds The RC is based on the release branch AOO410, revision 1585426! And a fresh and clean RAT scan output of this revision can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc2/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html Please vote on releasing this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 The vote starts now and will be open until: Friday, 11 April: 2014-04-11 11:00am UTC+2. But we invite all people to vote (non binding) on this RC. We would like to provide a release that is supported by the majority of our project members. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 [ ] 0 Don't care [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... (1) the upload for the Linux artifacts is still ongoing, expected to be available in 2-3 hours. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599
Sounds perfect. Adding options (instead of assuming and deciding for the user) is always positive ;) Please make sure that the fix in situation 2) is also included in the MSP On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in AOO 4.1.0 RC2, from current behaviors and comments provided in this bug, the expected behaviors for upgrade on Windows could be: 1. If the former version is 3.x, there will be a check box in Installation Wizard providing the option to keep or remove the former version - If select Remove all older product versions, then 3.x will be removed and 4.x will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for 4.x - If de-select Remove all older product versions, then 4.x will be installed with keeping 3.x, there will be 2 startup groups, 2 desktop icons and 2 entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. These artifacts are one suite for 3.x and the other suite for 4.x 2. If the former version is also 4.x, but older than current installing one(e.g. install 4.1.0 over 4.0.0), then the older one will be removed and the newer one will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for the newer one. I think above behaviors are acceptable, I propose to update the installation instructions [1] according those. Any comments, or any objections? [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26) does not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old version for an upgrade installation. I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when submit the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with details as below: 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc) 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows, Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on Linux and Mac, but need confirmation That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding. You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate! Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit patches which we can review. We could use help from all folks using our installation binaries on this. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Installation guide are asked to review and update when fix bug 124599
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote: On 10.04.2014 06:55, Yuzhen Fan wrote: Hi all, Bug 124599 [2] is verified fixed in AOO 4.1.0 RC2, from current behaviors and comments provided in this bug, the expected behaviors for upgrade on Windows could be: Good idea. Good text but maybe a native speaker can tweek the wording. -Andre 1. If the former version is 3.x, there will be a check box in Installation Wizard providing the option to keep or remove the former version - If select Remove all older product versions, then 3.x will be removed and 4.x will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for 4.x - If de-select Remove all older product versions, then 4.x will be installed with keeping 3.x, there will be 2 startup groups, 2 desktop icons and 2 entries in the Add/Remove Programs list. These artifacts are one suite for 3.x and the other suite for 4.x 2. If the former version is also 4.x, but older than current installing one(e.g. install 4.1.0 over 4.0.0), then the older one will be removed and the newer one will be installed with 1 startup group, 1 desktop icon and 1 entry in the Add/Remove Programs list. This artifact is for the newer one. I think above behaviors are acceptable, I propose to update the installation instructions [1] according those. Any comments, or any objections? This sounds good. We can tweak the wording as needed. It would also be very helpful to provide a screen shot of the installation wizard for case #1 I think. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions. html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 12:37 AM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:39 AM, Yuzhen Fan fanyuz...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, The current installation instructions [1] (last updated on 2014-03-26) does not differentiate the clean installation and upgrade installation for Windows, thus it does not state the option to keep or delete the old version for an upgrade installation. I propose development update the installation instructions [1] when submit the fix to bug 124599 [2], to provide what is expected to see with details as below: 1. Upgrade from old version to relative new version (e.g. from 3.3 to 3.4.1, from 3.4.1 to 4.1.0, from 4.0.0 to 4.1.0, etc) 2. Specify the different behavior/experience on all platforms (Windows, Linux and Mac) - I do not see problems in the current instructions on Linux and Mac, but need confirmation That is essential, because for testers we need this as criteria for testing, and for end users we need this as instructions for guiding. You are right. We need to have our installations instructions accurate! Commmitters can directly edit this page and commit. Others can submit patches which we can review. We could use help from all folks using our installation binaries on this. [1] http://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#winoverview [2] Issue 124599 - Windows 4.1.0 installer does not recognize former versions correctly -- Regards, Yu Zhen -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
I am cross posting here since I am not getting much traction on the dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the module located http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great! -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on. -Original Message- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what is wrong with my extension http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach e-openoffice it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with extensions. I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a few sentences what exactly you try - which programming language do you use - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ... - ... Juergen -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org' Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I do not understand what is going on here. I suspect that the crash is cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the stack trace leading up to the RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file. =[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in Reference.hxx [2] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this = 0xea4f9a88, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in dp_backend.cxx [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in dp_backend.cxx I really need to get over this hurdle. -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined. addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However, a RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819. Then on line 830, the code then tries to recover the original status then call activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is not correct. Here is high level stack trace (typed out). [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this- 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:c...@codebuilders.net] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:53 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 04/04/2014 12:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org wrote: On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am not convinced the issue is with the extension. I created another simple extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash. I don't know where to go from here. ... Raymond, What version of AOO and
Re: Error
Read this: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7t=65670 - Mail original - De: David Center dbcen...@spamarrest.com À: dev@openoffice.apache.org Envoyé: Jeudi 10 Avril 2014 18:53:11 Objet: Error When I try to install OO 4.0.1, I get a message saying to exit 4.0.1. How can one exit a program that is in the process of being installed? The program is definitely not installed on my computer. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Steele, Raymond raymond.ste...@lmco.comwrote: I am cross posting here since I am not getting much traction on the dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the module located http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great! You might take a look at this wiki page: https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Extensions/Extensions_and_Apache_OpenOffice_4.0 I will try to make it easier to find. -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on. -Original Message- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what is wrong with my extension http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach e-openoffice it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with extensions. I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a few sentences what exactly you try - which programming language do you use - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ... - ... Juergen -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org' Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I do not understand what is going on here. I suspect that the crash is cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the stack trace leading up to the RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file. =[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in Reference.hxx [2] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this = 0xea4f9a88, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in dp_backend.cxx [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in dp_backend.cxx I really need to get over this hurdle. -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined. addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However, a RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819. Then on line 830, the code then tries to recover the original status then call activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is not correct. Here is high level stack trace (typed out). [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this- 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:c...@codebuilders.net] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:53 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 04/04/2014 12:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org wrote: On
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am cross posting here since I am not getting much traction on the dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the module located http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great! -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on. -Original Message- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what is wrong with my extension http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach e-openoffice it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with extensions. I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a few sentences what exactly you try - which programming language do you use - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ... - ... Juergen -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org' Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I do not understand what is going on here. I suspect that the crash is cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the stack trace leading up to the RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file. =[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in Reference.hxx [2] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this = 0xea4f9a88, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in dp_backend.cxx [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in dp_backend.cxx I really need to get over this hurdle. -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined. addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However, a RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819. Then on line 830, the code then tries to recover the original status then call activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is not correct. Here is high level stack trace (typed out). [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this- 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:c...@codebuilders.net] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:53 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 04/04/2014 12:38 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 3:49 AM, Carl Marcum cmar...@apache.org wrote: On 04/03/2014 07:29 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am not convinced the issue is with the extension. I created another simple extension using the Netbeans plugin and I receive the same crash. I don't know where to go from here. ... Raymond, What version of AOO and netbeans are you
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:31:39PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am cross posting here since I am not getting much traction on the dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the module located http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great! You don't mention from where you got that AOO 4 for Solaris; nobody here builds on Solaris, so all that strange crashes you mention on your mails sound like a broken bridge on that platform (and that's where the bug you quote in one of your mails is pointing to, but in that case to a broken bridge after a GCC version update on Linux). That said, I know nothing about the bridge related code, so sorry I cannot help. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpdQywmCqbgg.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
Thanks Carl! Unfortunately, I will not be able to send you the .oxt file. Sorry. I am now looking over the additional information that you and Kay Schenk provided. -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:55 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: a...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am cross posting here since I am not getting much traction on the dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the module located http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach e-openoffice Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great! -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on. -Original Message- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what is wrong with my extension http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apac h e-openoffice it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with extensions. I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a few sentences what exactly you try - which programming language do you use - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ... - ... Juergen -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org' Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I do not understand what is going on here. I suspect that the crash is cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the stack trace leading up to the RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file. =[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in Reference.hxx [2] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this = 0xea4f9a88, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in dp_backend.cxx [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in dp_backend.cxx I really need to get over this hurdle. -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined. addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However, a RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819. Then on line 830, the code then tries to recover the original status then call activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is not correct. Here is high level stack trace (typed out). [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this- 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:c...@codebuilders.net] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:53 PM To:
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
Thanks Ariel. I compiled the code myself for Solaris 11 using Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers. -Original Message- From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:58 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes This e-mail message contained a file attachment that was blocked per Lockheed Martin Corporate Information Security Requirements. Certain file types are being blocked from entering Lockheed Martin in order to minimize risk to Corporate computing and information resources. If a business need exists and you must receive this file, alternate methods have been approved for use by Corporate Information Security for receipt and review of files/attachments. For more information and options for handling blocked attachments, visit E-mail Attachment Security, at http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/isafe/topics.e-attachments.cfm The current list of allowed attachment types is located at: http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/awareness/e-msging/allowed_attachments.cfm If additional assistance is required, please contact the Lockheed Martin Service Desk at 1-800-435-7063. == On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 07:31:39PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am cross posting here since I am not getting much traction on the dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the module located http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach e-openoffice Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great! You don't mention from where you got that AOO 4 for Solaris; nobody here builds on Solaris, so all that strange crashes you mention on your mails sound like a broken bridge on that platform (and that's where the bug you quote in one of your mails is pointing to, but in that case to a broken bridge after a GCC version update on Linux). That said, I know nothing about the bridge related code, so sorry I cannot help. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
Carl, I could scan and email you files if you could tell me which ones would be interesting to you. Thanks, Raymond -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:55 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: a...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am cross posting here since I am not getting much traction on the dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the module located http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach e-openoffice Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great! -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on. -Original Message- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what is wrong with my extension http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apac h e-openoffice it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with extensions. I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a few sentences what exactly you try - which programming language do you use - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ... - ... Juergen -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org' Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I do not understand what is going on here. I suspect that the crash is cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the stack trace leading up to the RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file. =[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in Reference.hxx [2] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this = 0xea4f9a88, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in dp_backend.cxx [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in dp_backend.cxx I really need to get over this hurdle. -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined. addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However, a RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819. Then on line 830, the code then tries to recover the original status then call activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is not correct. Here is high level stack trace (typed out). [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this- 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:c...@codebuilders.net] Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 3:53 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re:
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:01:22PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote: Thanks Ariel. I compiled the code myself for Solaris 11 using Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers. This might be the difference between OOo 3.3 and the AOO 4 you built yourself: OOo 3.3 was compiled with Sun Studio 12 / C++-5.9 according to https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Compiler_versions_used_by_port_maintainers_and_release_engineers Studio 12.3 comes with C++ 5.12 according to http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24457_01/html/E21991/bkabe.html#scrolltoc The compiler might have changed in a way that broke the bridge. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpQjeAqnJ0s6.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
Thanks, but I am totally lost when you mention bridge. -Original Message- From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 3:40 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes This e-mail message contained a file attachment that was blocked per Lockheed Martin Corporate Information Security Requirements. Certain file types are being blocked from entering Lockheed Martin in order to minimize risk to Corporate computing and information resources. If a business need exists and you must receive this file, alternate methods have been approved for use by Corporate Information Security for receipt and review of files/attachments. For more information and options for handling blocked attachments, visit E-mail Attachment Security, at http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/isafe/topics.e-attachments.cfm The current list of allowed attachment types is located at: http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/awareness/e-msging/allowed_attachments.cfm If additional assistance is required, please contact the Lockheed Martin Service Desk at 1-800-435-7063. == On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:01:22PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote: Thanks Ariel. I compiled the code myself for Solaris 11 using Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers. This might be the difference between OOo 3.3 and the AOO 4 you built yourself: OOo 3.3 was compiled with Sun Studio 12 / C++-5.9 according to https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Compiler_versions_used_by_port_maintainers_and_release_engineers Studio 12.3 comes with C++ 5.12 according to http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24457_01/html/E21991/bkabe.html#scrolltoc The compiler might have changed in a way that broke the bridge. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:41:28PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote: Thanks, but I am totally lost when you mention bridge. Literally, a bridge, for example a bridge from your compiler's C++ ABI to UNO and back. See the stuff under /trunk/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/ Strange crashes not reproducible on other platforms like the ones you describe here and in RE: EXTERNAL: Re: DisposedException may point to something broken there. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina pgpj3wV_5ofqa.pgp Description: PGP signature
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
The stack trace at the crash does lead me down into that area of the code. [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack =0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294,xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec,0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3]dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this = 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx Also, I was able to install the extension mentioned here with success. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121577 -Original Message- From: Ariel Constenla-Haile [mailto:arie...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 4:02 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes This e-mail message contained a file attachment that was blocked per Lockheed Martin Corporate Information Security Requirements. Certain file types are being blocked from entering Lockheed Martin in order to minimize risk to Corporate computing and information resources. If a business need exists and you must receive this file, alternate methods have been approved for use by Corporate Information Security for receipt and review of files/attachments. For more information and options for handling blocked attachments, visit E-mail Attachment Security, at http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/isafe/topics.e-attachments.cfm The current list of allowed attachment types is located at: http://protection.global.lmco.com/protection/awareness/e-msging/allowed_attachments.cfm If additional assistance is required, please contact the Lockheed Martin Service Desk at 1-800-435-7063. == On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 10:41:28PM +, Steele, Raymond wrote: Thanks, but I am totally lost when you mention bridge. Literally, a bridge, for example a bridge from your compiler's C++ ABI to UNO and back. See the stuff under /trunk/main/bridges/source/cpp_uno/ Strange crashes not reproducible on other platforms like the ones you describe here and in RE: EXTERNAL: Re: DisposedException may point to something broken there. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
Carl, I have the new Netbeans plugin. I created a new Add-on project (just an empty one that does nothing), compiled and generated the .OXT. The Extension manager still rejects it and OpenOffice crashes. I was able to install the extension mentioned here with success. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121577 -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:55 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: a...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am cross posting here since I am not getting much traction on the dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the module located http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach e-openoffice Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great! -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on. -Original Message- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what is wrong with my extension http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apac h e-openoffice it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with extensions. I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a few sentences what exactly you try - which programming language do you use - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ... - ... Juergen -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org' Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I do not understand what is going on here. I suspect that the crash is cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the stack trace leading up to the RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file. =[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in Reference.hxx [2] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this = 0xea4f9a88, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in dp_backend.cxx [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in dp_backend.cxx I really need to get over this hurdle. -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined. addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However, a RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819. Then on line 830, the code then tries to recover the original status then call activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is not correct. Here is high level stack trace (typed out). [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this- 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line
Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes
On 04/10/2014 07:15 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: Carl, I have the new Netbeans plugin. I created a new Add-on project (just an empty one that does nothing), compiled and generated the .OXT. The Extension manager still rejects it and OpenOffice crashes. I was able to install the extension mentioned here with success. https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121577 -Original Message- From: Carl Marcum [mailto:cmar...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 2:55 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: a...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 04/10/2014 03:31 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I am cross posting here since I am not getting much traction on the dev list and it appears it may be API related. I have an add-on that I developed using the Netbeans Openiffice module. This .oxt file works fine on AOO 3.3, but since I switched to AOO 4.0.1 and after a recompile, the Extension Manager will not take my add-on (see below please). However, the extension manager will take the module located http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apach e-openoffice Is there anything that the new AOO needs configured within the .oxt that was not needed in 3.3? Any help would be great! -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2014 8:08 AM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Thanks. I am using Java. The extension I have works on my Solaris 10 OpenOffice 3.3 instance, but not on my Solaris 11 4.0.1 instance. I used the OpenOffice Netbeans module to create the Add-on. -Original Message- From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 11:16 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes On 4/8/14 11:49 PM, Steele, Raymond wrote: I installed the extension located at the following link with success, so what is wrong with my extension http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apac h e-openoffice it's difficult to say without having the code, you can easy make mistakes with extensions. I haven't followed the thread in detail but maybe you can describe in a few sentences what exactly you try - which programming language do you use - which kind of extension, an add-on, a calc add-in, ... - ... Juergen -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 10:31 AM To: 'dev@openoffice.apache.org' Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes Is there any one that is familiar with this code and able to lend a hand. I do not understand what is going on here. I suspect that the crash is cpp_vtable_call is due to a RuntimeException thrown in Reference.hxx because pQueried is equal to (nil). Here is the stack trace leading up to the RunTimeException during the registration of my .oxt file. =[1] com::sun::star::uno::BaseReference::iquery_throw(pInterface = 0x9e348ac, rType = CLASS), line 81 in Reference.hxx [2] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_a0TEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this = 0xea4f9a88, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackge = true, startup = false, abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx [3] dp_registry::backend::Package::processPackage_Impl(this = 0xea4f9a88, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false, xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 675 in dp_backend.cxx [4] dp_registy::backend::Package::registerPackage(this = 0xe9b94c58, startup = '\0', xAbortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CALSS), line 725 in dp_backend.cxx I really need to get over this hurdle. -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Friday, April 04, 2014 5:52 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Extension Manager Add Crashes I am still plugging away at this issue. This is what I have determined. addExtension is called in dp_extensionmanager.cxx. However, a RuntimeException is thrown somewhere and caught on line 819. Then on line 830, the code then tries to recover the original status then call activateExtension, which then leads up to the crash, which happens after an attempt to register and process the package in dp_component.cxx. I am not sure if the initial RuntimeException is causing the problem, but something is not correct. Here is high level stack trace (typed out). [1] cpp_vtable_call(nFunctionIndex = 3, nVtableOffset = 0, pCallStack = 0xe90acea8, nRegReturn = -1649035904490436800LL) in cpp2uno.cxx [2] privateSnippetExecutorGeneral(0x9daf5d4, 0xe91d7294, 0xe90ad250, 0xe90ad1ec, 0x0, 0x0), at 0xf83516a2 [3] dp_registry::backend::component::_unamed_AjaA7n_aOTEvD::BackendImpl::ComponentPackageImpl::processPackage_(this- 0xe91d7240, _ARG2 = CLASS, doRegisterPackage = true, startup = false,abortChannel = CLASS, xCmdEnv = CLASS), line 1554 in dp_component.cxx
