Re: PDF Not saving some characters
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 23:11:42 -0700 Asia Jones wrote: > I was hoping to get some help with an issue I have. On two separate > occasions, when I've made a document into a PDF, Japanese characters, and the > elongated - symbol have not properly, and have come out as rectangular boxes. > Is there any way to fix this? > This is a font issue. Try setting to PDF/A-1a in Export as PDF dialog -- Rory O'Farrell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
PDF Not saving some characters
I was hoping to get some help with an issue I have. On two separate occasions, when I've made a document into a PDF, Japanese characters, and the elongated - symbol have not properly, and have come out as rectangular boxes. Is there any way to fix this?
Call for evaluation test on W2K12 server
We have got some enquiry for AOO support on W2K12 server. Although we have no official support for W2K12 server for AOO 4.1, I think we could make an evaluation for this platform. If you have W2K12 server, and can help testing on this platform over the next weeks, please send a note to the QA mailing list ( q...@openoffice.apache.org) with your Testlink account[1] (if you haven't a Testlink account, you can register one). You should also get installation sets from trunk [2] and report issues in Bugzilla [3]. [1] http://aootesting.adfinis-sygroup.org/index.php [2] http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ [3] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ Thanks! -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Starting Introduction to Contributing to Apache OpenOffice Module
Sara Montecino wrote: > My name is Sara Montecino, and I am looking to gain experience in > technical writing. I am a 3rd year English major in the San Francisco > Bay Area, have a particular passion for gaming, and believe > technical writing to be a good foundation to build my career. I have > currently have no foundation in this particular writing field and am > searching to build new skills and gain expertise. > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > Greetings Sarah and welcome to Apache OpenOffice. You have started out in the right place by using our orientation pages. If you are interested in volunteering with the documentation team you should definitely read the documentation orientation page at http://openoffice.apache.org/orientation/intro-doc.html if you have not already. I see that you are subscribed to the documentation mailing list already. That is where most communication for the documentation team is done. I hope to see you on the doc list and I look forward to working with you. Regards Keith N. McKenna signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: News about the new OOXML framework.
Great, makes sense. I've been way too busy at $job and am barely reading my email. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 3, 2014, at 7:41 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > >> On 03/06/14 13:20, Dave Fisher wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Are you aware of Apache POI? >> >> Reads and writes most Ooxml in Java. > > yes, we know POI and Andrea pointed already on thread where this was > discussed. > > When you look in the details Java is used for the SchemaParser and later > on to generate a C++ parser. No plans to use Java during runtime in the > office to parse OOXML. But Java is perfect and productive for the > development of the tooling etc. > > Juergen > >> >> Regards, >> Dave >> >> Apache POI and OpenOffice PMCs >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Jun 3, 2014, at 3:41 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: >>> >>> I would like to give a short status update about the new OOXML framework. >>> >>> - Created the new module main/ooxml >>> There are not yet any makefiles that build the contents of the ooxml/ >>> module nor link it into the build process of OpenOffice. However, you can >>> use e.g. Eclipse to import the Java projects that are described below. >>> >>> - Moved the old Office Open XML wiki pages out of the way and create two >>> new ones: >>> = "OfficeOpenXML" contains an introduction into the OOXML file format, a >>> status overview of the implementation progress and links to more detailed >>> information. >>> = "OOXML" and "ooxml" (uppercase/lowercase) redirect to "OfficeOpenXML" so >>> that there is no excuse to not find this page. >>> = "OOXML Framework" contains more detailed information about the new >>> framework. >>> >>> - Created a new Java project at ooxml/main/source/framework/SchemaParser >>> that parses the XML schema files that come with the ECMA-376 specification >>> files. >>> Its purpose is to read the schema files and create a skeleton OOXML parser >>> from it. This skeleton can then be filled in with code for importing >>> certain elements of OOXML documents. >>> >>> - Created a new Java project at >>> ooxml/main/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser. Its purpose is testing and >>> debugging of and experimenting with the schema parser. It is not intended >>> to become a runtime component of OpenOffice. >>> >>> >>> The SchemaParser is able to parse all files of the ECMA-376 specification >>> both in the old (1st edition of 2006) and new (4th edition of 2012) >>> versions. It looks like we need both since the new one is the current >>> standard (equivalent to the ISO standard) while the old on is actually used. >>> Not all details of the schema files are handled yet. >>> >>> The JavaOOXMLParser, based on parser tables created by the SchemaParser, is >>> already able to parse the large DOCX file of the 1st edition specification. >>> When pretty printed it is about 90 MB large. It takes the parser about 90 >>> s to read it. Note that the parser is not optimized in any way (if it >>> where then it would be optimized for readability, not for speed) and that >>> it writes about 650 MB of log files in the process. >>> >>> If anyone would like to play with the parsers, I will gladly provide more >>> details. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Andre >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?
Am 06/04/2014 12:00 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I'm doing last fixes and updates. My feeling says the new webpage is
nearly finished and ready to go Live.
Please have a look and test.
I would like to use this as new default download webpage before the
weekend.
Thanks
Marcus
Here's something odd --
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/index_droplist.html
detects my OS correctly -- Linux 32
this one:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html
thinks I'm Windows?
just a little error for the platform recognition (an "if" query was
missing {} brackets).
Thanks for the hint. It's now fixed and also my Firefox shows Linux again.
I don't always publish my changes at the end. But now the webpages on
staging and production are the same again.
anyway. assuming things get corrected on this. Yes, definitely ready for
prime-time I think.
Yeah! :-)
Good night & see you all tomorrow.
Marcus
Am 05/30/2014 12:03 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
OK, here is another update:
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html
What was updated?
- Disabled the old green box for now. Put the focus to the new.
- Using the $NL_LANG variable in "index.html" will pre-set a language
instead of using the browser-guessed language.
- Added hint text - directly below the headline - that the download
comes from Sourceforge.
- Added data for 4.0.1 and 4.0.0, so all 4.x versions are working.
- The 2 links with icons got a cursor with "help" sign.
- When choosing not fitting selections, this is shown to the user with a
hint text what the alternative is.
Then 2 download buttons got a cursor with "not allowed" sign.
Examples:
- Mac OS X 64-bit and AOO 4.0.1 or AOO 4.0.0
- Mac OS X 32-bit and AOO 4.1.0
- Hebrew and AOO 4.0.1
- When browsing with an unsupported OS (that means, other than Windows,
Linux and Mac) then the user gets a hint text that this is not
supported and what to do as alternative.
Then 2 download buttons got a cursor with "not allowed" sign.
What is next?
- Do we want to offer AOO 3.4.1 as last stable 3.x release?
- Updating the "Full vs. Langpack" text in separate window.
- Updating the "analyze.html" webpage to use it as "broken link
reporting tool".
- Separate code and strings.
Then it will be easier to use the same download webpage on all
localized websites, get the same look& feel everywhere but with the
freedom to translate the text.
Testing:
- Testing via Browsershots.org is somewhat challenging. Often the
requests are expiring before the screenshots are ready.
And still no IE available. :-(
But it looks good so far on Windows, Linux and Mac with Firefox,
Chrome, Opera and Safari.
Do you still have some more suggestions?
Thanks :-)
Marcus
Am 05/19/2014 12:47 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
This weekend just a little update as I was not able to do more work
(healthy problem):
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html
- The [Reset] button is gone.
- Styled the 3 select boxes as the default look& feel is, hm, just
default. ;-)
- Styled the both download buttons more eye-catching. To keep it simply
I've intentionally avoided to use graphics as I think a text button is
better suited here.
- The icons and links for "full install vs. langpack info" and "Report
broken link" were moved to the sub-green box. Because it's terrible
difficult to keep the text and link status correctly updated for
different selected values.
Marcus
Am 05/04/2014 06:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Another update, seems this weekend I've my productive phase: ;-)
http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html
What was done:
- Grey box:
- Bye, bye grey color - hello green freshness.
- The select boxes are prefilled with the browser guessed data.
- The information link has now a (i) icon.
- Added a "Report broken link" - pointing to the debug webpage.
The icon alone is maybe not meaningful enough, therefore an
additional text link.
(Of course the debug webpage needs further work to really work as
report function.)
- All not primary important data are now in the sub-box.
Now it looks more clean.
- Green box:
- All not primary important data are now in the sub-box.
Now it looks more clean and the focus is set for downloading only.
- Links:
- I've moved and deleted links and also adjusted the headlines.
- In the nav bar as well as in the colored boxes.
- Of course it's just a suggestion and can be discussed/changed.
What is not yet working:
- The version drop-down-box has still no effect for others than 4.1.0.
It's a bigger effort as I've to take into account every
available build for every release in the past.
- The [Reset] button is now not working as expected, however maybe
it's indeed no longer necessary?
What do you think?
What are the next steps:
- Make the version drop-down-box work for older releases.
- Improve the styling of the both d
Re: Code snippets from oooforum in AOO website?
Le 02/06/2014 21:49, Michal Hriň a écrit : Have you tried "internet archive" ? https://web.archive.org/web/20140322204726/http://www.oooforum.org/ Thanks! I could retrieve the registration page: While the administrators and moderators of this forum will attempt to remove or edit any generally objectionable material as quickly as possible, it is impossible to review every message. Therefore you acknowledge that all posts made to these forums express the views and opinions of the author and not the administrators, moderators or webmaster (except for posts by these people) and hence will not be held liable. You agree not to post any abusive, obscene, vulgar, slanderous, hateful, threatening, sexually-oriented or any other material that may violate any applicable laws. Doing so may lead to you being immediately and permanently banned (and your service provider being informed). The IP address of all posts is recorded to aid in enforcing these conditions. You agree that the webmaster, administrator and moderators of this forum have the right to remove, edit, move or close any topic at any time should they see fit. As a user you agree to any information you have entered above being stored in a database. While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised. This forum system uses cookies to store information on your local computer. These cookies do not contain any of the information you have entered above; they serve only to improve your viewing pleasure. The e-mail address is used only for confirming your registration details and password (and for sending new passwords should you forget your current one). By clicking Register below you agree to be bound by these conditions. So it's not very clear. The only sentence I see related to license is: While this information will not be disclosed to any third party without your consent the webmaster, administrator and moderators cannot be held responsible for any hacking attempt that may lead to the data being compromised. Hagar - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote: > I'm doing last fixes and updates. My feeling says the new webpage is > nearly finished and ready to go Live. > > Please have a look and test. > > I would like to use this as new default download webpage before the > weekend. > > Thanks > > Marcus > Here's something odd -- http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/index_droplist.html detects my OS correctly -- Linux 32 this one: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html thinks I'm Windows? anyway. assuming things get corrected on this. Yes, definitely ready for prime-time I think. > > > > Am 05/30/2014 12:03 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): > > OK, here is another update: >> >> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html >> >> What was updated? >> >> - Disabled the old green box for now. Put the focus to the new. >> >> - Using the $NL_LANG variable in "index.html" will pre-set a language >> instead of using the browser-guessed language. >> >> - Added hint text - directly below the headline - that the download >> comes from Sourceforge. >> >> - Added data for 4.0.1 and 4.0.0, so all 4.x versions are working. >> >> - The 2 links with icons got a cursor with "help" sign. >> >> - When choosing not fitting selections, this is shown to the user with a >> hint text what the alternative is. >> Then 2 download buttons got a cursor with "not allowed" sign. >> Examples: >> - Mac OS X 64-bit and AOO 4.0.1 or AOO 4.0.0 >> - Mac OS X 32-bit and AOO 4.1.0 >> - Hebrew and AOO 4.0.1 >> >> - When browsing with an unsupported OS (that means, other than Windows, >> Linux and Mac) then the user gets a hint text that this is not >> supported and what to do as alternative. >> Then 2 download buttons got a cursor with "not allowed" sign. >> >> >> >> What is next? >> >> - Do we want to offer AOO 3.4.1 as last stable 3.x release? >> >> - Updating the "Full vs. Langpack" text in separate window. >> >> - Updating the "analyze.html" webpage to use it as "broken link >> reporting tool". >> >> - Separate code and strings. >> Then it will be easier to use the same download webpage on all >> localized websites, get the same look & feel everywhere but with the >> freedom to translate the text. >> >> >> >> Testing: >> >> - Testing via Browsershots.org is somewhat challenging. Often the >> requests are expiring before the screenshots are ready. >> >> And still no IE available. :-( >> >> But it looks good so far on Windows, Linux and Mac with Firefox, >> Chrome, Opera and Safari. >> >> Do you still have some more suggestions? >> >> Thanks :-) >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> Am 05/19/2014 12:47 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >> >>> This weekend just a little update as I was not able to do more work >>> (healthy problem): >>> >>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html >>> >>> - The [Reset] button is gone. >>> >>> - Styled the 3 select boxes as the default look & feel is, hm, just >>> default. ;-) >>> >>> - Styled the both download buttons more eye-catching. To keep it simply >>> I've intentionally avoided to use graphics as I think a text button is >>> better suited here. >>> >>> - The icons and links for "full install vs. langpack info" and "Report >>> broken link" were moved to the sub-green box. Because it's terrible >>> difficult to keep the text and link status correctly updated for >>> different selected values. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> >>> Am 05/04/2014 06:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): >>> Another update, seems this weekend I've my productive phase: ;-) http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html What was done: - Grey box: - Bye, bye grey color - hello green freshness. - The select boxes are prefilled with the browser guessed data. - The information link has now a (i) icon. - Added a "Report broken link" - pointing to the debug webpage. The icon alone is maybe not meaningful enough, therefore an additional text link. (Of course the debug webpage needs further work to really work as report function.) - All not primary important data are now in the sub-box. Now it looks more clean. - Green box: - All not primary important data are now in the sub-box. Now it looks more clean and the focus is set for downloading only. - Links: - I've moved and deleted links and also adjusted the headlines. - In the nav bar as well as in the colored boxes. - Of course it's just a suggestion and can be discussed/changed. What is not yet working: - The version drop-down-box has still no effect for others than 4.1.0. It's a bigger effort as I've to take into account every available build for every release in the past. - The [Reset] button is now not working as expected, however maybe it's indeed no longer necessary? What do you think? What are the next steps: >>
Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?
Any comments and opinions about this topic? Thanks Marcus Am 05/30/2014 12:32 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): One more design question. The both download buttons have now a hover over effect. They are displayed inverted. So, what do think is better as permanent design? - Go back as it was before: Light background, dark border, dark text - Go with the new inverted look: Dark background, light border, light text - Leave it as it now, to have both is perfect. Please tell me. :-) Thanks Marcus Am 05/30/2014 12:03 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): OK, here is another update: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html What was updated? - Disabled the old green box for now. Put the focus to the new. - Using the $NL_LANG variable in "index.html" will pre-set a language instead of using the browser-guessed language. - Added hint text - directly below the headline - that the download comes from Sourceforge. - Added data for 4.0.1 and 4.0.0, so all 4.x versions are working. - The 2 links with icons got a cursor with "help" sign. - When choosing not fitting selections, this is shown to the user with a hint text what the alternative is. Then 2 download buttons got a cursor with "not allowed" sign. Examples: - Mac OS X 64-bit and AOO 4.0.1 or AOO 4.0.0 - Mac OS X 32-bit and AOO 4.1.0 - Hebrew and AOO 4.0.1 - When browsing with an unsupported OS (that means, other than Windows, Linux and Mac) then the user gets a hint text that this is not supported and what to do as alternative. Then 2 download buttons got a cursor with "not allowed" sign. What is next? - Do we want to offer AOO 3.4.1 as last stable 3.x release? - Updating the "Full vs. Langpack" text in separate window. - Updating the "analyze.html" webpage to use it as "broken link reporting tool". - Separate code and strings. Then it will be easier to use the same download webpage on all localized websites, get the same look & feel everywhere but with the freedom to translate the text. Testing: - Testing via Browsershots.org is somewhat challenging. Often the requests are expiring before the screenshots are ready. And still no IE available. :-( But it looks good so far on Windows, Linux and Mac with Firefox, Chrome, Opera and Safari. Do you still have some more suggestions? Thanks :-) Marcus Am 05/19/2014 12:47 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): This weekend just a little update as I was not able to do more work (healthy problem): http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html - The [Reset] button is gone. - Styled the 3 select boxes as the default look & feel is, hm, just default. ;-) - Styled the both download buttons more eye-catching. To keep it simply I've intentionally avoided to use graphics as I think a text button is better suited here. - The icons and links for "full install vs. langpack info" and "Report broken link" were moved to the sub-green box. Because it's terrible difficult to keep the text and link status correctly updated for different selected values. Marcus Am 05/04/2014 06:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Another update, seems this weekend I've my productive phase: ;-) http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html What was done: - Grey box: - Bye, bye grey color - hello green freshness. - The select boxes are prefilled with the browser guessed data. - The information link has now a (i) icon. - Added a "Report broken link" - pointing to the debug webpage. The icon alone is maybe not meaningful enough, therefore an additional text link. (Of course the debug webpage needs further work to really work as report function.) - All not primary important data are now in the sub-box. Now it looks more clean. - Green box: - All not primary important data are now in the sub-box. Now it looks more clean and the focus is set for downloading only. - Links: - I've moved and deleted links and also adjusted the headlines. - In the nav bar as well as in the colored boxes. - Of course it's just a suggestion and can be discussed/changed. What is not yet working: - The version drop-down-box has still no effect for others than 4.1.0. It's a bigger effort as I've to take into account every available build for every release in the past. - The [Reset] button is now not working as expected, however maybe it's indeed no longer necessary? What do you think? What are the next steps: - Make the version drop-down-box work for older releases. - Improve the styling of the both download links. - Combine the both green boxes. - And further suggestions from you. Thanks in advance for testing. :-) Marcus Am 05/03/2014 12:41 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): I've done some further work. http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html What is working: - Filesizes are shown for selected full install + langpack. - Checksum links are shown for selected full install + langpack. - When choices are done a little help icon is shown. Click on it to get to a
Re: [DOWNLOAD][PROPOSAL] How to download another version than offered in the green box?
I'm doing last fixes and updates. My feeling says the new webpage is nearly finished and ready to go Live. Please have a look and test. I would like to use this as new default download webpage before the weekend. Thanks Marcus Am 05/30/2014 12:03 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): OK, here is another update: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html What was updated? - Disabled the old green box for now. Put the focus to the new. - Using the $NL_LANG variable in "index.html" will pre-set a language instead of using the browser-guessed language. - Added hint text - directly below the headline - that the download comes from Sourceforge. - Added data for 4.0.1 and 4.0.0, so all 4.x versions are working. - The 2 links with icons got a cursor with "help" sign. - When choosing not fitting selections, this is shown to the user with a hint text what the alternative is. Then 2 download buttons got a cursor with "not allowed" sign. Examples: - Mac OS X 64-bit and AOO 4.0.1 or AOO 4.0.0 - Mac OS X 32-bit and AOO 4.1.0 - Hebrew and AOO 4.0.1 - When browsing with an unsupported OS (that means, other than Windows, Linux and Mac) then the user gets a hint text that this is not supported and what to do as alternative. Then 2 download buttons got a cursor with "not allowed" sign. What is next? - Do we want to offer AOO 3.4.1 as last stable 3.x release? - Updating the "Full vs. Langpack" text in separate window. - Updating the "analyze.html" webpage to use it as "broken link reporting tool". - Separate code and strings. Then it will be easier to use the same download webpage on all localized websites, get the same look & feel everywhere but with the freedom to translate the text. Testing: - Testing via Browsershots.org is somewhat challenging. Often the requests are expiring before the screenshots are ready. And still no IE available. :-( But it looks good so far on Windows, Linux and Mac with Firefox, Chrome, Opera and Safari. Do you still have some more suggestions? Thanks :-) Marcus Am 05/19/2014 12:47 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): This weekend just a little update as I was not able to do more work (healthy problem): http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html - The [Reset] button is gone. - Styled the 3 select boxes as the default look & feel is, hm, just default. ;-) - Styled the both download buttons more eye-catching. To keep it simply I've intentionally avoided to use graphics as I think a text button is better suited here. - The icons and links for "full install vs. langpack info" and "Report broken link" were moved to the sub-green box. Because it's terrible difficult to keep the text and link status correctly updated for different selected values. Marcus Am 05/04/2014 06:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): Another update, seems this weekend I've my productive phase: ;-) http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html What was done: - Grey box: - Bye, bye grey color - hello green freshness. - The select boxes are prefilled with the browser guessed data. - The information link has now a (i) icon. - Added a "Report broken link" - pointing to the debug webpage. The icon alone is maybe not meaningful enough, therefore an additional text link. (Of course the debug webpage needs further work to really work as report function.) - All not primary important data are now in the sub-box. Now it looks more clean. - Green box: - All not primary important data are now in the sub-box. Now it looks more clean and the focus is set for downloading only. - Links: - I've moved and deleted links and also adjusted the headlines. - In the nav bar as well as in the colored boxes. - Of course it's just a suggestion and can be discussed/changed. What is not yet working: - The version drop-down-box has still no effect for others than 4.1.0. It's a bigger effort as I've to take into account every available build for every release in the past. - The [Reset] button is now not working as expected, however maybe it's indeed no longer necessary? What do you think? What are the next steps: - Make the version drop-down-box work for older releases. - Improve the styling of the both download links. - Combine the both green boxes. - And further suggestions from you. Thanks in advance for testing. :-) Marcus Am 05/03/2014 12:41 AM, schrieb Marcus (OOo): I've done some further work. http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html What is working: - Filesizes are shown for selected full install + langpack. - Checksum links are shown for selected full install + langpack. - When choices are done a little help icon is shown. Click on it to get to a help text for "full install vs. langpack". - Some release data is shown like in the green box. What is not yet working: - The version dropdown box has no effect yet but it shows already how it could work (likely). - I've not tested with all browsers. So, maybe someth
Re: Older versions
Am 06/03/2014 10:12 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile: On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:15:22PM +, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125023 I don't see any place to download an older version. The user was searching for 4.0.1. The download page as a link to "Old and legacy version" but is listing 3.4.1 and 3.3.0; I couldn't find an easy way to get 4.0.1, except from the "Archived and legacy releases" link on the right, that leads to https://www.openoffice.org/download/archive.html Should 3.4.1 be replaced with 4.0.1? I won't do any changes on the "old" download webpage anymore. As you may know I'm working on a new version: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index_droplist.html When this is finally online, the problem will be solved. I'm doing last fixes and updates and planning to be ready before the weekend. Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Older versions (was: [Issue 125023] Constantly Crashes)
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 11:15:22PM +, bugzi...@apache.org wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125023 > I don't see any place to download an older version. The user was searching for 4.0.1. The download page as a link to "Old and legacy version" but is listing 3.4.1 and 3.3.0; I couldn't find an easy way to get 4.0.1, except from the "Archived and legacy releases" link on the right, that leads to https://www.openoffice.org/download/archive.html Should 3.4.1 be replaced with 4.0.1? Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Possible broken link: from other.html
Am 06/02/2014 11:36 PM, schrieb Antanas Rydelis: Helo, I, Antanas Rydelis, from Costa Rica, need instal office program. You can download OpenOffice from its main download webpage: http://www.openoffice.org/download/ HTH Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [CODE]: googletest is now available and can be used
ok, after fixing some problems on the different platforms it seems to work now at least on Linux, Mac and Windows. In the sal module some tests are already migrated and can be used as samples for further migration. It is straight forward and most tests are probably easy to migrate. But as always the work have to be done. I hope some volunteers are interested to help and start working on it. Question or detailed discussion about problems or migration steps are welcome here on the list and can be discussed. Juergen On 02/06/14 13:11, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I have integrated googletest (gtest) in our build environment and it can > be used now. A first simple test in sal (sal/qa/sal) is using gtest now. > > Some basic information and references can be found on [1]. See also the > related task id [2] > > A further and deeper integration in gbuild (similar to cppunit) is > possible but not yet implemented. > > Gtest is now a new prerequisite but can be easy disabled during the > configure step. Single tests can be disable highlevel in the makefile or > more fine grained in the sources. Details can be found on the wiki page [1]. > > Maybe some volunteers have interest to adapt further existing unit > tests, the idea is to migrate all existing tests from cppunit to gtest. > > The main purpose of course is to make use of this new unit test > framework from the beginning for the planned work on a new improved > OOXML processing framework. > > Juergen > > > [1] https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Googletest > [2] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125003 > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Code snippets from oooforum in AOO website?
Hi Andrea, Andrea Pescetti schrieb: On 01/06/2014 Hagar Delest wrote: Le 01/06/2014 16:51, Rob Weir a écrit : Is it possible to approach the operator of oooforum.org and discuss this? ... Then we are at a dead end... We already had this kind of discussion in November 2011. Since I doubt we can reach Ed, this is a lost cause. It's very good that you have a backup available. As for being able to re-upload it, if you think that we have better chances if we contact oooforum "officially" on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice project, we can of course do so. If there are personal or confidential data involved, that you don't want to post in public, you can use private AT openoffice.apache.org I tried to get the terms of use but oooforum cannot be reached anymore. It's still alive but almost unreachable. Our official forum at forum.openoffice.org is indeed in much, much better shape and if we get all needed permissions we can repost the content there. I think, an "officially" contact would be good. If the contact via email (see Whois info posted on private@) does not work, then perhaps a contact via UnitedLayer is possible. http://www.unitedlayer.com/management.htm Kind regards Regina - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: News about the new OOXML framework.
On 03/06/14 13:20, Dave Fisher wrote: > Hi, > > Are you aware of Apache POI? > > Reads and writes most Ooxml in Java. yes, we know POI and Andrea pointed already on thread where this was discussed. When you look in the details Java is used for the SchemaParser and later on to generate a C++ parser. No plans to use Java during runtime in the office to parse OOXML. But Java is perfect and productive for the development of the tooling etc. Juergen > > Regards, > Dave > > Apache POI and OpenOffice PMCs > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Jun 3, 2014, at 3:41 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: >> >> I would like to give a short status update about the new OOXML framework. >> >> - Created the new module main/ooxml >> There are not yet any makefiles that build the contents of the ooxml/ >> module nor link it into the build process of OpenOffice. However, you can >> use e.g. Eclipse to import the Java projects that are described below. >> >> - Moved the old Office Open XML wiki pages out of the way and create two new >> ones: >> = "OfficeOpenXML" contains an introduction into the OOXML file format, a >> status overview of the implementation progress and links to more detailed >> information. >> = "OOXML" and "ooxml" (uppercase/lowercase) redirect to "OfficeOpenXML" so >> that there is no excuse to not find this page. >> = "OOXML Framework" contains more detailed information about the new >> framework. >> >> - Created a new Java project at ooxml/main/source/framework/SchemaParser >> that parses the XML schema files that come with the ECMA-376 specification >> files. >> Its purpose is to read the schema files and create a skeleton OOXML parser >> from it. This skeleton can then be filled in with code for importing >> certain elements of OOXML documents. >> >> - Created a new Java project at ooxml/main/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser. >> Its purpose is testing and debugging of and experimenting with the schema >> parser. It is not intended to become a runtime component of OpenOffice. >> >> >> The SchemaParser is able to parse all files of the ECMA-376 specification >> both in the old (1st edition of 2006) and new (4th edition of 2012) >> versions. It looks like we need both since the new one is the current >> standard (equivalent to the ISO standard) while the old on is actually used. >> Not all details of the schema files are handled yet. >> >> The JavaOOXMLParser, based on parser tables created by the SchemaParser, is >> already able to parse the large DOCX file of the 1st edition specification. >> When pretty printed it is about 90 MB large. It takes the parser about 90 s >> to read it. Note that the parser is not optimized in any way (if it where >> then it would be optimized for readability, not for speed) and that it >> writes about 650 MB of log files in the process. >> >> If anyone would like to play with the parsers, I will gladly provide more >> details. >> >> Best regards, >> Andre >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: News about the new OOXML framework.
Dave Fisher wrote: Are you aware of Apache POI? Reads and writes most Ooxml in Java. Already discussed here: http://markmail.org/message/jhdsrqxfdczvoyy4 And thanks, Andre, for the nice progress and detailed information! Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: News about the new OOXML framework.
Hi, Are you aware of Apache POI? Reads and writes most Ooxml in Java. Regards, Dave Apache POI and OpenOffice PMCs Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 3, 2014, at 3:41 AM, Andre Fischer wrote: > > I would like to give a short status update about the new OOXML framework. > > - Created the new module main/ooxml > There are not yet any makefiles that build the contents of the ooxml/ module > nor link it into the build process of OpenOffice. However, you can use e.g. > Eclipse to import the Java projects that are described below. > > - Moved the old Office Open XML wiki pages out of the way and create two new > ones: > = "OfficeOpenXML" contains an introduction into the OOXML file format, a > status overview of the implementation progress and links to more detailed > information. > = "OOXML" and "ooxml" (uppercase/lowercase) redirect to "OfficeOpenXML" so > that there is no excuse to not find this page. > = "OOXML Framework" contains more detailed information about the new > framework. > > - Created a new Java project at ooxml/main/source/framework/SchemaParser that > parses the XML schema files that come with the ECMA-376 specification files. > Its purpose is to read the schema files and create a skeleton OOXML parser > from it. This skeleton can then be filled in with code for importing certain > elements of OOXML documents. > > - Created a new Java project at ooxml/main/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser. > Its purpose is testing and debugging of and experimenting with the schema > parser. It is not intended to become a runtime component of OpenOffice. > > > The SchemaParser is able to parse all files of the ECMA-376 specification > both in the old (1st edition of 2006) and new (4th edition of 2012) versions. > It looks like we need both since the new one is the current standard > (equivalent to the ISO standard) while the old on is actually used. > Not all details of the schema files are handled yet. > > The JavaOOXMLParser, based on parser tables created by the SchemaParser, is > already able to parse the large DOCX file of the 1st edition specification. > When pretty printed it is about 90 MB large. It takes the parser about 90 s > to read it. Note that the parser is not optimized in any way (if it where > then it would be optimized for readability, not for speed) and that it writes > about 650 MB of log files in the process. > > If anyone would like to play with the parsers, I will gladly provide more > details. > > Best regards, > Andre > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: EuroOffice
On 3 June 2014 11:42, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: > On 03/06/14 10:03, Guy Waterval wrote: > > Hi Andrea, > > Hi all, > > > > 2014-06-03 8:41 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti : > > > >> Guy Waterval wrote: > >> > >>> I'd like to know which kind of contacts has the AOO project with the > >>> EuroOffice group > >>> > >> > >> No formal contacts, but representatives from Multiracio speak at > >> OpenOffice events, like the latest ApacheCon Europe: > >> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/openoffice_track_at_apachecon_day > >> (internal links are now broken, since the site now points to ApacheCon > >> 2014, November in Budapest). > >> > > > > So, any *eventual* collaboration with the EuroOffice project would not be > > considered as a "casus belli" by the AOO project if it is ensured that > the > > contributions remain under ALv2.0 and therefore reusable by the AOO > > project? > > any collaboration under the known project rules/constraints is welcome > and very much appreciated. Open source can work only if you give > something back and don't take only. > > LO is a very bad example from my pov and EuroOffice don't give back > either as far as I know. At least not in a way where the project AOO > benefit from it. > > I highly agree with juergen, "collaboration" is a two-way street, and would be highly welcomed, together we are stronger. "take only" is legal in terms of licensing, but is in my opinion against the concept of opensource. having said that, I welcome any collaboration that makes the software more useable. rgds jan I. Juergen > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: News about the new OOXML framework.
On 03/06/14 09:41, Andre Fischer wrote: > I would like to give a short status update about the new OOXML framework. > > - Created the new module main/ooxml > There are not yet any makefiles that build the contents of the ooxml/ > module nor link it into the build process of OpenOffice. However, you > can use e.g. Eclipse to import the Java projects that are described below. > > - Moved the old Office Open XML wiki pages out of the way and create two > new ones: > = "OfficeOpenXML" contains an introduction into the OOXML file format, > a status overview of the implementation progress and links to more > detailed information. > = "OOXML" and "ooxml" (uppercase/lowercase) redirect to > "OfficeOpenXML" so that there is no excuse to not find this page. > = "OOXML Framework" contains more detailed information about the new > framework. for convenience, the wiki pages can be found under https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OOXML https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/OOXML_Framework > > - Created a new Java project at ooxml/main/source/framework/SchemaParser > that parses the XML schema files that come with the ECMA-376 > specification files. > Its purpose is to read the schema files and create a skeleton OOXML > parser from it. This skeleton can then be filled in with code for > importing certain elements of OOXML documents. > > - Created a new Java project at > ooxml/main/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser. Its purpose is testing and > debugging of and experimenting with the schema parser. It is not > intended to become a runtime component of OpenOffice. > > > The SchemaParser is able to parse all files of the ECMA-376 > specification both in the old (1st edition of 2006) and new (4th edition > of 2012) versions. It looks like we need both since the new one is the > current standard (equivalent to the ISO standard) while the old on is > actually used. > Not all details of the schema files are handled yet. > > The JavaOOXMLParser, based on parser tables created by the SchemaParser, > is already able to parse the large DOCX file of the 1st edition > specification. When pretty printed it is about 90 MB large. It takes > the parser about 90 s to read it. Note that the parser is not optimized > in any way (if it where then it would be optimized for readability, not > for speed) and that it writes about 650 MB of log files in the process. > > If anyone would like to play with the parsers, I will gladly provide > more details. Thanks for the update, I think it's good to know that you are already able to read both versions as described above. I believe most users of OOXML don't care about the spec and even don't know that the files produced today are by default OOXML transitional. OOXML is far more complex than reading one spec ... but nobody cares about the complexity and simply want pr expect a 1:1 support ;-) Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: EuroOffice
On 03/06/14 10:03, Guy Waterval wrote: > Hi Andrea, > Hi all, > > 2014-06-03 8:41 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti : > >> Guy Waterval wrote: >> >>> I'd like to know which kind of contacts has the AOO project with the >>> EuroOffice group >>> >> >> No formal contacts, but representatives from Multiracio speak at >> OpenOffice events, like the latest ApacheCon Europe: >> https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/openoffice_track_at_apachecon_day >> (internal links are now broken, since the site now points to ApacheCon >> 2014, November in Budapest). >> > > So, any *eventual* collaboration with the EuroOffice project would not be > considered as a "casus belli" by the AOO project if it is ensured that the > contributions remain under ALv2.0 and therefore reusable by the AOO > project? any collaboration under the known project rules/constraints is welcome and very much appreciated. Open source can work only if you give something back and don't take only. LO is a very bad example from my pov and EuroOffice don't give back either as far as I know. At least not in a way where the project AOO benefit from it. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: I can not edit a website
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > as I can see the commits were now successful. yes I see. > Any hint about the root > cause or just "Now it's suddenly working"? ;-) You mean of me? I have done nothing Jörg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: EuroOffice
Hi Andrea, Hi all, 2014-06-03 8:41 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti : > Guy Waterval wrote: > >> I'd like to know which kind of contacts has the AOO project with the >> EuroOffice group >> > > No formal contacts, but representatives from Multiracio speak at > OpenOffice events, like the latest ApacheCon Europe: > https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/openoffice_track_at_apachecon_day > (internal links are now broken, since the site now points to ApacheCon > 2014, November in Budapest). > So, any *eventual* collaboration with the EuroOffice project would not be considered as a "casus belli" by the AOO project if it is ensured that the contributions remain under ALv2.0 and therefore reusable by the AOO project? A+ -- gw > >
News about the new OOXML framework.
I would like to give a short status update about the new OOXML framework. - Created the new module main/ooxml There are not yet any makefiles that build the contents of the ooxml/ module nor link it into the build process of OpenOffice. However, you can use e.g. Eclipse to import the Java projects that are described below. - Moved the old Office Open XML wiki pages out of the way and create two new ones: = "OfficeOpenXML" contains an introduction into the OOXML file format, a status overview of the implementation progress and links to more detailed information. = "OOXML" and "ooxml" (uppercase/lowercase) redirect to "OfficeOpenXML" so that there is no excuse to not find this page. = "OOXML Framework" contains more detailed information about the new framework. - Created a new Java project at ooxml/main/source/framework/SchemaParser that parses the XML schema files that come with the ECMA-376 specification files. Its purpose is to read the schema files and create a skeleton OOXML parser from it. This skeleton can then be filled in with code for importing certain elements of OOXML documents. - Created a new Java project at ooxml/main/source/framework/JavaOOXMLParser. Its purpose is testing and debugging of and experimenting with the schema parser. It is not intended to become a runtime component of OpenOffice. The SchemaParser is able to parse all files of the ECMA-376 specification both in the old (1st edition of 2006) and new (4th edition of 2012) versions. It looks like we need both since the new one is the current standard (equivalent to the ISO standard) while the old on is actually used. Not all details of the schema files are handled yet. The JavaOOXMLParser, based on parser tables created by the SchemaParser, is already able to parse the large DOCX file of the 1st edition specification. When pretty printed it is about 90 MB large. It takes the parser about 90 s to read it. Note that the parser is not optimized in any way (if it where then it would be optimized for readability, not for speed) and that it writes about 650 MB of log files in the process. If anyone would like to play with the parsers, I will gladly provide more details. Best regards, Andre - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
