Re: Windows buildbot failures -- can you help?

2015-04-04 Thread Oliver Brinzing

Hi,

 If you've been building with Windows, we could use some assistance with
 tracking down our Windows buildbot problem. See our buildbot results
 page -- http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/

yesterday i build an aoo debug version with source from 
https://github.com/apache/openoffice
on a win 7 64bit vm. finally it worked (the vm crashed 2 times with a BSOD and 
i had to clean
and restart...).

I used same build setting as for my aoo 4.1.1 debug build 3 months ago:

SourceMain=/cygdrive/c/build_tmp/aoo-src/main
cd $SourceMain
autoconf

./configure \
--with-build-version=$(date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z (%a, %d %b %Y)) \
--with-vendor=AOO Debug Build \
--with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2;
 \
--with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/build/ant \
--with-mozilla-build=/cygdrive/c/build/mozilla-build \
--with-frame-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0 \
--with-psdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0 \
--with-midl-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0/bin \
--with-cl-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0/VC 
 \
--with-mspdb-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 
9.0/Common7/IDE \
--with-asm-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 
9.0/VC/bin \
--with-csc-path=/cygdrive/c/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5 \
--with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0  \
--with-nsis-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/NSIS/Unicode \
--with-directx-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft DirectX SDK (June 
2010) \
--with-atl-include-dir=/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/atl71 \
--with-atl-lib-dir=/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/ATL/i386 \
--with-mfc-include-dir=/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/mfc42 \
--with-mfc-lib-dir=/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/Mfc/i386 \
--enable-pch \
--with-package-format=installed msi \
--enable-win-x64-shellext \
--enable-category-b \
--enable-bundled-dictionaries \
--with-lang=de \
--without-fonts \
--without-stlport \
--without-junit \
--disable-online-update \
--disable-odk \
--disable-strip-solver \
--enable-symbols \
--enable-dbgutil \
--enable-crashdump \
--enable-debug \
--enable-verbose \

./bootstrap
source winenv.set.sh
cd instsetoo_native
build --all -P2 -- -P2

btw: debug output is a bit unfortunate, i get *dozens* of log errors, if i insert a table into a 
writer document:


 Error: getSdrAllFillAttributesHelper() call only valid for RES_FLYFRMFMT and 
RES_FRMFMT (!)
 From File c:/build_tmp/aoo-src/main/sw/source/core/layout/atrfrm.cxx at Line 
3404

Can you tell me the build settings for an official build please?

Regards
Oliver


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: English Dictionaries updated - 1-APR-2015

2015-04-04 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 30/03/2015 Marco A.G.Pinto wrote:

Just to inform everyone that I have updated the dictionaries for
OpenOffice and Mozilla.


Thank you for your continued work on this!


https://github.com/marcoagpinto/aoo-mozilla-en-dict
Please notice that I added a paragraph with some extra text at the
bottom of GitHub to explain to people how to check if a word is already
there. Could someone tell me if the text is okay or if should add/remove
something?


I think it's OK. I was initially confused since I expected that 
wordlist.txt had to be found as an additional resource within the OXT, 
but on a second reading it's clear that you refer to the files you make 
available at Github (and it's correct that they are not included in the 
extension).


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.

2015-04-04 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 01/04/2015 jan i wrote:

On 1 April 2015 at 09:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Big thanks are not for the report. But still very appropriate for the
list... so big thanks to who worked for events! ...

Actually before I became member I was mentioned in 5-6 board reports like
that


For project reports I find it more appropriate to simply give credit, 
like X Y organized an OpenOffice event as opposed to Big thanks to X 
Y for organizing an OpenOffice event. But the version now online is OK.



I use AOO on purpose in reports, because is the
project, I use Apache openOffice when referring to something that includes
our ecosystem, and openOffice when referring to the office suite and
ecosystem in general.


I'm not sure about this. It is just wording after all, nothing to change 
in the report; but Apache OpenOffice is OpenOffice and OpenOffice is 
Apache OpenOffice (and nothing else); if someone wants to speak about 
OpenOffice and others then OpenOffice ecosystem is more explicit and 
clear (even if I don't love this terminology).



I agree that we are committed to bringing out the release (changed text to
reflect that) and that we could and should resume some work here, but that
is future and the report is about the last 3 months, so I prefer to keep
the no work is active.


Well, I agree it's time to stop talking about what to write in the 
report and to resume some of the work I had already sent here weeks ago...



Have a look at the changes, and let me know if they are ok to you.


They are OK. My remaining concerns are:
- Title and link: this is the 2015-Apr report, not the March one.
- Forum is not mentioned anywhere; at least a sentence like The 
official, volunteer-run, OpenOffice support Forums remain very popular 
with users would be appropriate.


And thanks a lot for giving the community time to discuss the report at 
length.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Windows buildbot failures -- can you help?

2015-04-04 Thread Ariel Constenla-Haile
Hello Oliver,

On Sat, Apr 04, 2015 at 10:13:10AM +0200, Oliver Brinzing wrote:
 Hi,
 
  If you've been building with Windows, we could use some assistance with
  tracking down our Windows buildbot problem. See our buildbot results
  page -- http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
 
 yesterday i build an aoo debug version with source from 
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice
 on a win 7 64bit vm. finally it worked (the vm crashed 2 times with a BSOD 
 and i had to clean
 and restart...).
 
 I used same build setting as for my aoo 4.1.1 debug build 3 months ago:
 
 SourceMain=/cygdrive/c/build_tmp/aoo-src/main
 cd $SourceMain
 autoconf

[...]

 Can you tell me the build settings for an official build please?

See comments in-line.

 ./configure \
 --with-build-version=$(date +%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S %z (%a, %d %b %Y)) \
 --with-vendor=AOO Debug Build \
 --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2;
  \
 --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/c/build/ant \
 --with-mozilla-build=/cygdrive/c/build/mozilla-build \
 --with-frame-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0 \
 --with-psdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0 \
 --with-midl-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0/bin \
 --with-cl-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 
 9.0/VC  \
 --with-mspdb-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 
 9.0/Common7/IDE \
 --with-asm-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft Visual Studio 
 9.0/VC/bin \
 --with-csc-path=/cygdrive/c/Windows/Microsoft.NET/Framework/v3.5 \
 --with-jdk-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Java/jdk1.7.0  \
 --with-nsis-path=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/NSIS/Unicode \
 --with-directx-home=/cygdrive/c/Program Files (x86)/Microsoft DirectX SDK 
 (June 2010) \
 --with-atl-include-dir=/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/atl71 \
 --with-atl-lib-dir=/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/ATL/i386 \
 --with-mfc-include-dir=/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/inc/mfc42 \
 --with-mfc-lib-dir=/cygdrive/c/WinDDK/7600.16385.1/lib/Mfc/i386 \
 --enable-pch \
 --with-package-format=installed msi \
 --enable-win-x64-shellext \
 --enable-category-b \
 --enable-bundled-dictionaries \
 --with-lang=de \
 --without-stlport \
 --without-junit \

Remove these:

 --without-fonts \
 --disable-online-update \
 --disable-odk \
 --disable-strip-solver \
 --enable-symbols \
 --enable-dbgutil \
 --enable-crashdump \
 --enable-debug \

This one can be kept. It only affect the build environment.

 --enable-verbose \
 
 ./bootstrap
 source winenv.set.sh
 cd instsetoo_native
 build --all -P2 -- -P2

--html will give you something like this:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/buildlogs/linux64/log/unxlngx6.pro.build.html


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile
La Plata, Argentina


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.

2015-04-04 Thread jan i
Sorry for top posting.

I have been asked by a PMC member to reopen the discussion about the board
report.

Background is that after the report was submitted, a ASF Member (not board
member and not part of our community)
felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative and
against the wishes of the community
(ASF Members can read board@ to get the precise wording).

I have sent the report exactly, as it is in our Wiki, only appended with  a
for board eyes only statement, that has
been thoroughly discussed on private@. I hope nobody in the community feels
they have not been given a fair
chance to ask for changes.

I politely ask the people who now wants the report changed, to show how the
report should look, and let the
community discuss. If the community wants the report formulated
differently, I will be happy to replace the
current report.

We do have a timing challenge, and need to act fast before the reporting
window closes, alternatively I can
replace the report with a short note stating the I (as chair) have removed
it, because the community need more
time to discuss the content.

rgds
jan I.





On 4 April 2015 at 11:48, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:

 On 01/04/2015 jan i wrote:

 On 1 April 2015 at 09:33, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

 Big thanks are not for the report. But still very appropriate for the
 list... so big thanks to who worked for events! ...

 Actually before I became member I was mentioned in 5-6 board reports like
 that


 For project reports I find it more appropriate to simply give credit, like
 X Y organized an OpenOffice event as opposed to Big thanks to X Y for
 organizing an OpenOffice event. But the version now online is OK.

  I use AOO on purpose in reports, because is the
 project, I use Apache openOffice when referring to something that includes
 our ecosystem, and openOffice when referring to the office suite and
 ecosystem in general.


 I'm not sure about this. It is just wording after all, nothing to change
 in the report; but Apache OpenOffice is OpenOffice and OpenOffice is Apache
 OpenOffice (and nothing else); if someone wants to speak about OpenOffice
 and others then OpenOffice ecosystem is more explicit and clear (even if
 I don't love this terminology).

  I agree that we are committed to bringing out the release (changed text to
 reflect that) and that we could and should resume some work here, but that
 is future and the report is about the last 3 months, so I prefer to keep
 the no work is active.


 Well, I agree it's time to stop talking about what to write in the report
 and to resume some of the work I had already sent here weeks ago...

  Have a look at the changes, and let me know if they are ok to you.


 They are OK. My remaining concerns are:
 - Title and link: this is the 2015-Apr report, not the March one.
 - Forum is not mentioned anywhere; at least a sentence like The official,
 volunteer-run, OpenOffice support Forums remain very popular with users
 would be appropriate.

 And thanks a lot for giving the community time to discuss the report at
 length.


 Regards,
   Andrea.

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.

2015-04-04 Thread Simon Phipps
On 5 Apr 2015 02:05, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
 I can
 replace the report with a short note stating the I (as chair) have removed
 it, because the community need more
 time to discuss the content.


That seems crazy, given the long review window and the absence of criticism
on this list. The report was openly discussed for longer than I recall any
other Board report. Any member claiming there was community opposition
should produce evidence to that effect.

The report should stand as-is rather than be voided by a private request
that seems to fly in the face of the public evidence.

S.


Re: Board report proposal, please comment before April 5.

2015-04-04 Thread jonathon
On 05/04/15 00:37, jan i wrote:

 felt that I as new AOO chair, had formulated the report too negative and 
 against the wishes of the community

I'm going to suggest that said PMC Member was simply shocked at the
radical difference in reporting styles.

You (Jan) do not like negative surprises. Consequently, your reports
reflect that POV.
Andrea is more surprise-tolerant, and consequently reports reflect that
POV.

Both reports are accurate. The difference is simply one of managerial
style --- mention potential risks, or only mention documented risks.
Both styles have their virtues.  Both styles have their vices.  The
people kicked upstairs can be traumatized by the difference in reporting
styles, during the transition process.



jonathon

  * English - detected
  * English

  * English

 javascript:void(0);



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Error at installation after building Openoffice (Ubuntu 14.04)

2015-04-04 Thread Andrea Pescetti

On 28/03/2015 Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:

where can one apply for a wiki account?


Here! I've just created one for you. You will receive a temporary 
password in a few minutes.


Note that the 12.04 section in the page you mentioned
https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Ubuntu_14.04
needs lots of fixes too. For example, our tarballs no longer contain 
incubating in their name, so links are broken. Feel free to ask here 
if you want to fix that section too.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Error at installation after building Openoffice (Ubuntu 14.04)

2015-04-04 Thread Driss Ben Zoubeir
Thanks :)

2015-04-04 21:30 GMT+02:00 Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org:

 On 28/03/2015 Driss Ben Zoubeir wrote:

 where can one apply for a wiki account?


 Here! I've just created one for you. You will receive a temporary password
 in a few minutes.

 Note that the 12.04 section in the page you mentioned
 https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_
 Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Ubuntu_14.04
 needs lots of fixes too. For example, our tarballs no longer contain
 incubating in their name, so links are broken. Feel free to ask here if
 you want to fix that section too.

 Regards,
   Andrea.


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org