Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Mechtilde]

Hello,

for my understanding, beside doing a good build it is necessary to have
and totest defined reference builds.

The way I see it, it is not easy to do a good build if you didn't have
enough practice doing it.

I didn't myself any C/C++ build before. So IHMO I will waste time to
improve my build environment instead of testing a reference build

My results of testing belong to the reference builds published as RC1 at
dist.apache.org.

Apache OpenOffice is a project with a wide user base, who only use the
binaries. So it is important to release well defined and tested binaries.

Otherwise support becomes hell.

Kind regards

Am 04.10.2016 um 01:58 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> On 10/3/2016 3:30 PM, Marcus wrote:
>> Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>>> On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
 Marcus wrote:

> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

Mechtilde Stehmann
--
## Apache OpenOffice.org
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian
## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
## PGP encryption welcome
## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[Proposal] Publish Apache Open Office on the apple store.

[Peter Kovacs]

Hello all,

I would like to propose to publish _Open Office_ as _Apache Foundation_ 
on the Apple store.


I am always dissapointed when I see some unknown developer publishes 
Open Source, and the Project itself is not present.

Afaik this costs money (99$/year).
Here is a blog post that explains the details what is involved as effort:
https://www.raywenderlich.com/127936/submit-an-app-part-1

Does the Apache Foundation allow this?
What does such a move involve on our side?
Where can we get the money from?
Do we want to do this on a general thought?

I would volunteer as a Apple Store publisher, if it comes down for 
volunteers who do it.

But I think this is only the last piece to think about.

all the best
Peter


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 12:52:50PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> There were German dictionary changes.

In this case, we only update the dictionaries to the latest version
available at the time, but there is nothing else to check here, the
dictionaries do not belong to the AOO source nor this project; if they
have issues, they should be reported to their respective maintainers.

> Can you tell the difference between
> de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each of the
> other dialects?


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Dr. Michael Stehmann]

Am 03.10.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference
> between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each
> of the other dialects?
> 

There are differences between the german languages spoken and written
(officially) in Switzerland, Austria and Germany.

For an example de_CH do not know a "ß", they write "ss" alltimes. There
are also distinctions in vocabulary.

You can find more information here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_German

Kind regards
Michael





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: In regards to Open Office

[Peter Kovacs]

On 03.10.2016 12:14, Jörg Schmidt wrote:

But [MS Office] OOXML is not what we could label a real open

format. There are parts that still refer to proprietary bits.

fud, or show me exactly what parts you mean
Well, I dont know if it is exactly a fud. There is a cornerstone truce 
to this.
Do not forget Microsoft was pretty much surprised by the success of ODF 
specification becoming a public ISO Standard.
Their first definition was hastely published, in Microsoft style. It was 
a agressive reponse. The stake back then was high for both sides. Media 
did support all sorts of sides in this time.
With ODF becoming ISO standard, the doors into US public service were 
open. This was acclaimed as a break of the Microsoft Office monopol.
As much as I remeber the OOXML allows you to add binary files directly 
into the document, which are not further defined. I mean it could be 
anything, and only Microsoft Office did know what it saved in these spots.
So yea the standard could techicly be only a shell and still remain 
intransparent. But IMHO it was only a specification flaw. For OpenSource 
warriors this was of course the invitation battle MS.
I think on Open source front, the success of ODF changed the attitude of 
embracing other Formats.
Before that there was a strong drive to make the Microsoft binary 
formats work. And support to support other Formats. This will dropped 
after the success of ODF.
But with OOXML tied to MS, and OO focusing on ODF the seperation on the 
market was imident, which was bad for bizzness.
So I think it turned a little when Novell (looking back, who had already 
bad experience with a similar situation n the UNIX market ;) ) made the 
cooperation deal with Microsoft to jointly work on both formats.
It is the turning point for Microsoft from fighting open source to 
embrace it.
However I think the bad Karma from the days still sticks for most 
people. Ballmer style just broke to much Glass in his time and MS just 
was to good Empire for the Rebellion.


I do belive that real openess is about choice, not about transparency. 
Transperency is about trust.
ODF has a better trancperency then OOXML. But beeing open we need to 
embrace and value both formats.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Apache OpenOffice release notification

[Patricia Shanahan]

The Apache OpenOffice project is currently preparing and testing a 
release candidate, 4.1.3-rc1. The total size of the artifacts, including 
the binary files, exceeds a gigabyte, so the release policy calls for 
notifying Infrastructure.


I do not expect significant Infrastructure impact because AOO is 
normally downloaded from SourceForge, not ASF or its mirrors.


Please contact me or post to dev@openoffice.apache.org if you need more 
details.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Infra notification?

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

Hi Patricia,

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 07:18:30PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> What is the total size of our binaries?

Linux 32 12759M
Linux 64 13328M
Windows   6178M
macOS 7185M

This includes hashes and signatures.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Carl Marcum]

On 10/03/2016 10:20 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

Hi Carl,

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:

On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there
are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we
have a complete release candidate.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


I'm trying to build 4.13.rc1 from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/source/

with
./configure   \
  --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`"
\
  --enable-verbose \
  --with-system-stdlibs \
  --enable-crashdump=yes \
  --enable-category-b \
  --enable-wiki-publisher \
  --enable-bundled-dictionaries \
  --enable-opengl  \
  --enable-dbus  \
  --enable-gstreamer \
  --with-package-format="rpm deb" \
  --with-lang="${LANGS}" \
--with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
\
--with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \
 --with-package-format="installed" \
 --with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60


and getting
...
downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
downloading to 
/home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
download from
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 failed
(404 Not Found)
 download failed
epm-3.7.tar.gz exists
making and entering 
/home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/
can not find the dmake package

Should I be using a different dmake?

apache-extras used googlecode, which is dead.

Both the building guide and configure's help point to a working dmake
url:

https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO413/main/configure.in?revision=1761303=markup#l29

http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2


Regards

Thanks Ariel !!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Ariel Constenla-Haile]

Hi Carl,

On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 09:58:25PM -0400, Carl Marcum wrote:
> On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> >I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as there
> >are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period until we
> >have a complete release candidate.
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> 
> I'm trying to build 4.13.rc1 from
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/source/
> 
> with
> ./configure   \
>  --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname -sm`"
> \
>  --enable-verbose \
>  --with-system-stdlibs \
>  --enable-crashdump=yes \
>  --enable-category-b \
>  --enable-wiki-publisher \
>  --enable-bundled-dictionaries \
>  --enable-opengl  \
>  --enable-dbus  \
>  --enable-gstreamer \
>  --with-package-format="rpm deb" \
>  --with-lang="${LANGS}" \
> --with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
> \
> --with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \
> --with-package-format="installed" \
> --with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60
> 
> 
> and getting
> ...
> downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
> downloading to 
> /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
> download from
> http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 failed
> (404 Not Found)
> download failed
> epm-3.7.tar.gz exists
> making and entering 
> /home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/
> can not find the dmake package
> 
> Should I be using a different dmake?

apache-extras used googlecode, which is dead.

Both the building guide and configure's help point to a working dmake
url:

https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/AOO413/main/configure.in?revision=1761303=markup#l29

http://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Carl Marcum]

On 10/03/2016 09:58 PM, Carl Marcum wrote:

On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as 
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period 
until we have a complete release candidate.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



I'm trying to build 4.13.rc1 from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/source/

with
./configure   \
 --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname 
-sm`" \

 --enable-verbose \
 --with-system-stdlibs \
 --enable-crashdump=yes \
 --enable-category-b \
 --enable-wiki-publisher \
 --enable-bundled-dictionaries \
 --enable-opengl  \
 --enable-dbus  \
 --enable-gstreamer \
 --with-package-format="rpm deb" \
 --with-lang="${LANGS}" \
--with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 
\
--with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz 
\

--with-package-format="installed" \
--with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60


and getting
...
downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
downloading to 
/home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
download from 
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 
failed (404 Not Found)

download failed
epm-3.7.tar.gz exists
making and entering 
/home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/

can not find the dmake package

Should I be using a different dmake?

Sorry, I just found the updated build scripts.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Infra notification?

[Patricia Shanahan]

According to http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#heads-up, 
infra needs to be notified in advance of releases of more than 1GB.


What is the total size of our binaries?

Do our releases really count for this, because most downloading will be 
from SourceForge, not ASF mirrors.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Carl Marcum]

On 09/25/2016 10:33 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as 
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period 
until we have a complete release candidate.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



I'm trying to build 4.13.rc1 from
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.3-rc1/source/

with
./configure   \
 --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") - `uname 
-sm`" \

 --enable-verbose \
 --with-system-stdlibs \
 --enable-crashdump=yes \
 --enable-category-b \
 --enable-wiki-publisher \
 --enable-bundled-dictionaries \
 --enable-opengl  \
 --enable-dbus  \
 --enable-gstreamer \
 --with-package-format="rpm deb" \
 --with-lang="${LANGS}" \
--with-dmake-url=http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 
\

--with-epm-url=http://www.msweet.org/files/project2/epm-3.7-source.tar.gz \
--with-package-format="installed" \
--with-jdk-home=/usr/java/jdk1.7.0_60


and getting
...
downloading dmake-4.12.tar.bz2
downloading to 
/home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/ext_sources/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2.part
download from 
http://dmake.apache-extras.org.codespot.com/files/dmake-4.12.tar.bz2 
failed (404 Not Found)

download failed
epm-3.7.tar.gz exists
making and entering 
/home/carl/dev/aoo/aoo-4.1.3-rc1/aoo-4.1.3/main/solenv/unxlngx6.pro/misc/build/

can not find the dmake package

Should I be using a different dmake?

Thanks,
Carl


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Patricia Shanahan]

On 10/3/2016 3:30 PM, Marcus wrote:

Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Marcus wrote:

wow, *all signed source code packages* ?


I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a
project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record,
trunk is already set to avoid duplication of packages, but AOO413 still
uses the old convention of 3 source packages. (If it helps, I've used
the .bz2 for my tests!).


For my testing, I'm assuming that it is enough to be sure a package is
identical to one I've tested. In particular, the .bz2 and .gz decompress
to the same .tar file, so I don't even plan to extract one of the tar
files for further checks.


ah, great hint.

I've uncompressed all 3 files, diff'ed the .tar.bz2 and .tar.gz files,
and finally uncompressed all files until the actual dirs/files. All 3
dirs had the same total file size of 1,541,414,704 bytes. This has to be
enough when it comes to "you have to check all source files".

Tomorrow I'll build the release from a package file.

@Andrea:
Can you please check the
"apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz.sha256" file? It's in
binary mode and not useable for checksum comparsion.


I am doing a build directly from the source distribution, but I've also 
done a "diff -r" between it and the svn, and only found the expected 
differences.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Marcus]

Am 10/03/2016 11:26 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Marcus wrote:

wow, *all signed source code packages* ?


I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a
project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record,
trunk is already set to avoid duplication of packages, but AOO413 still
uses the old convention of 3 source packages. (If it helps, I've used
the .bz2 for my tests!).


For my testing, I'm assuming that it is enough to be sure a package is
identical to one I've tested. In particular, the .bz2 and .gz decompress
to the same .tar file, so I don't even plan to extract one of the tar
files for further checks.


ah, great hint.

I've uncompressed all 3 files, diff'ed the .tar.bz2 and .tar.gz files, 
and finally uncompressed all files until the actual dirs/files. All 3 
dirs had the same total file size of 1,541,414,704 bytes. This has to be 
enough when it comes to "you have to check all source files".


Tomorrow I'll build the release from a package file.

@Andrea:
Can you please check the 
"apache-openoffice-4.1.3-r1761381-src.tar.gz.sha256" file? It's in 
binary mode and not useable for checksum comparsion.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Patricia Shanahan]

On 10/3/2016 2:02 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

Marcus wrote:

wow, *all signed source code packages* ?


I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2,
the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a
project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record,
trunk is already set to avoid duplication of packages, but AOO413 still
uses the old convention of 3 source packages. (If it helps, I've used
the .bz2 for my tests!).


For my testing, I'm assuming that it is enough to be sure a package is 
identical to one I've tested. In particular, the .bz2 and .gz decompress 
to the same .tar file, so I don't even plan to extract one of the tar 
files for further checks.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Translate offline

[Andrea Pescetti]

On 30/09/2016 Claudio Ferreia Filho wrote:

i continue doing some translations to AOO, but I saw that
translate.apache.org is offline.
If someone can do something to warn the infra, is a good thing.


It is one of the monitored services by Apache Infra, so notifications 
are sent out when it is offline and it is usually promptly restored. I 
see it is working normally now, but I didn't receive any downtime 
notifications for it during the last week.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Andrea Pescetti]

Marcus wrote:

wow, *all signed source code packages* ?


I assume that this does not literally mean that you must test the .bz2, 
the .gz and the .zip. They are equivalent. This sentence is for when a 
project makes a release composed of different parts. For the record, 
trunk is already set to avoid duplication of packages, but AOO413 still 
uses the old convention of 3 source packages. (If it helps, I've used 
the .bz2 for my tests!).



Nevertheless, when there are still no objections we should start the
vote in the very next days.


I understand that we want to reduce the vote to a pure formality 
(meaning: being sure that the vote passes), and this is good to do to 
avoid waste of time. Based on what I've done/seen so far, personally and 
through feedback from the list, I'm already quite sure of my +1 when the 
vote starts.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Hagar Delest]

No problem so far with some use with Writer, Impress and Calc (not much).
Both with EN-US core install with French package (on kids account).

Hagar

Le 25/09/2016 à 20:33, Marcus a écrit :

Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.


thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows builds.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Matthias Seidel]

Do you know which particular changes I should look for?

The dictionaries are from december 2015, so I had them already in use in
4.1.2.

But I can confirm that the difference between "schließen" (de/de-AT) and
"schliessen" (de-CH) is recognised.


Am 03.10.2016 um 21:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference
> between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in
> each of the other dialects?
>
> On 10/3/2016 12:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I installed and tested the german version (de) on:
>>
>>  - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit)
>>  - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit)
>>
>> Everything is working as expected.
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.
>>>
>>> I did also some work with it without problems
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Mechtilde
>>>
>>> Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus:
 Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
>> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote
>> period
>> until we have a complete release candidate.
> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows
> builds.
 I've done the following for testing:

 Installation
 

 Windows 10
 --
 Windows deOK
 Windows de langpackOK
 Windows en-USOK
 Windows en-US langpackOK

 Fedora 21 64-bit
 
 Linux x86-64 rpm deOK
 Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK
 Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK
 Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK

 Quick test
 ==
 Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK

 Release data
 
 Version number, "About" dialogOK

 Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small,
 this quick test should be good enough.

 Marcus


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>>
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Keith N. McKenna]

Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
> until we have a complete release candidate.
Testing latest 4.1.3 Development en-US on Windows with the following
configuration:
System Configuration:
Processor: Intel Core i5 CPU M560 @2.67GHz
Installed Memory: 2.00 GB (1.6 usable)
Operating System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit
With the following results:

Download Files
fileStatus
exe Completed
pgp signature   Completed
md5 hashCompleted
sha256 hash Completed
Verify exe against
Files   Status
pgp signature   Verified
md5 hasfVerified
sha256 hash Verified
Install AOO413m1(Build:9783)  -  Rev. 1761381
2016-09-29 02:39:19 Successful
Using as installed version with no problems at this time.

Regard
Keith




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Marcus]

Am 10/03/2016 09:49 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:


On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:

Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.

A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to
have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the
PMC member's control. See
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval

PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me
decide when to start a vote.


I've build today that branch with release options. Is this sufficient or
do I need to build from the [zip|gz|bzip] file?


I believe it does have to be from the zip etc. but I am not sure. The
actual wording is:

"Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download
all signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that
they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below,
validate all cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the
result on their own platform."


wow, *all signed source code packages* ? What a bummer. ;-) OK, I'll do 
that testing tomorrow.


Nevertheless, when there are still no objections we should start the 
vote in the very next days.


Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell

[Giorgi Vakhtangishvili]

Thank you Yakov very much .

I will check the resources you have sent to me.


Regards,
Giorgi

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 7:47 PM, Yakov Reztsov 
wrote:

> Hello,
> I think you can make Georgia hunspell dictionary in UTF-8 encoding.
> After creating the hunspell dictionary it needs to be packed to OpenOffice
> extension like this:
> http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-
> dictionaries-apache-openoffice
> The author of this expansion has created a utility for easy editing
> OpenOffice dictionary -  Proofing Tool GUI  http://marcoagpinto.
> cidadevirtual.pt/proofingtoolgui.html
>
>
>
> >Понедельник,  3 октября 2016, 14:42 +03:00 от Giorgi Vakhtangishvili <>:
> >
> >Hello OpenOffice,
> >
> >I'm Giorgi Vakhtangishvili, writing to you from Tbilisi, Georgia. Didn't
> >know who to write to and on which mail, so here I am.
> >
> >We are the team of developers who work on different RnD projects from
> >Georgia.
> >
> >The reason for me writing to you is that, there's is one big problem in
> >Georgia, that we are now trying to solve and we think that you can help us
> >a lot:
> >
> >As you may know, Georgia has it's own alphabet but there is no support of
> >our written language's SpellChecker in such big softwares, like
> OpenOffice,
> >LibreOffice, Chrome, Opera, Safari and etc. These softwares are used in
> >Georgia everyday and there's a big demand for integration of Georgian
> Spell
> >Checker in them.
> >
> >Currently, our team is working on it and as one of the options of
> >fulfilling our goal is to create Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell's Open
> >Source library. As long as, Hunspell is used by the Softwares mentioned
> >above, it will automatically add support of Georgian spell checker to them
> >too.
> >
> >This is the reason I'm writing to you.
> >
> >What do you think about it ? Are we on a right track ?
> >We tried to contact to Nemeth but unfortunately got no answer from him.
> Can
> >you help me with contacting Hunspell team ?
> >Is it possible to contribute to Hunspell Library and add Georgian spell
> >checker to it ?
> >What are the steps and requirements to get through this process ?
> >
> >
> >We hope for your support and guidance.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Giorgi Vakhtangishvili.
> >
> >--
> >*Giorgi Vakhtangishvili*
> >
> >*CTO, Developer*
> >
> >*GeoLab*
> >
> >*g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge < g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge >*
>
>
> --
>
> Yakov Reztsov
>



-- 
*Giorgi Vakhtangishvili*

*CTO, Developer*

*GeoLab*

*g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge *

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Andrea Pescetti]

Patricia Shanahan wrote:

On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:

Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me
decide when to start a vote.


Done on Linux-64, successful.


I've build today that branch with release options. Is this sufficient or
do I need to build from the [zip|gz|bzip] file?

I believe it does have to be from the zip etc. but I am not sure.


This might is an assumption in the documentation, but the differences 
between the two are documented at 
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127148 and are really minimal: 
the build is not affected at all, so I would consider them equivalent in 
practice.


Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Patricia Shanahan]

There were German dictionary changes. Can you tell the difference 
between de, de_AT, and de_CH? If so, could you perhaps do a test in each 
of the other dialects?


On 10/3/2016 12:19 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hello,

I installed and tested the german version (de) on:

 - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit)
 - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit)

Everything is working as expected.

regards

Matthias


Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde:

Hello,

I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.

I did also some work with it without problems

Regards

Mechtilde

Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.

thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows
builds.

I've done the following for testing:

Installation


Windows 10
--
Windows deOK
Windows de langpackOK
Windows en-USOK
Windows en-US langpackOK

Fedora 21 64-bit

Linux x86-64 rpm deOK
Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK
Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK
Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK

Quick test
==
Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK

Release data

Version number, "About" dialogOK

Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small,
this quick test should be good enough.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Patricia Shanahan]

On 10/3/2016 12:45 PM, Marcus wrote:

Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.

A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to
have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the
PMC member's control. See
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval

PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me
decide when to start a vote.


I've build today that branch with release options. Is this sufficient or
do I need to build from the [zip|gz|bzip] file?


I believe it does have to be from the zip etc. but I am not sure. The 
actual wording is:


"Before casting +1 binding votes, individuals are REQUIRED to download 
all signed source code packages onto their own hardware, verify that 
they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, 
validate all cryptographic signatures, compile as provided, and test the 
result on their own platform."



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Marcus]

Am 10/03/2016 09:40 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement
for a release.

A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to
have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the
PMC member's control. See
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval

PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me
decide when to start a vote.


I've build today that branch with release options. Is this sufficient or 
do I need to build from the [zip|gz|bzip] file?


Thanks

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Testing 4.1.3 - source builds

[Patricia Shanahan]

Testing seems to be going well, but there is a very specific requirement 
for a release.


A PMC member, to cast a binding +1 vote approving a relese, needs to 
have built the software from source and tested it on a machine under the 
PMC member's control. See 
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval


PMC members please indicate when they have done that test, to help me 
decide when to start a vote.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Marcus]

Am 10/03/2016 09:19 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:


I installed and tested the german version (de) on:

  - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit)
  - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit)

Everything is working as expected.


I got a mail from Jan that his tests on Win 7 were successful, too. I 
hope he can post this also on his own here.


Marcus




Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde:

Hello,

I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.

I did also some work with it without problems

Regards

Mechtilde

Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:

Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:

I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
until we have a complete release candidate.

thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows
builds.

I've done the following for testing:

Installation


Windows 10
--
Windows deOK
Windows de langpackOK
Windows en-USOK
Windows en-US langpackOK

Fedora 21 64-bit

Linux x86-64 rpm deOK
Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK
Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK
Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK

Quick test
==
Starting, creating files, saving, copy&  pasting and quittingOK

Release data

Version number, "About" dialogOK

Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small,
this quick test should be good enough.

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Matthias Seidel]

Hello,

I installed and tested the german version (de) on:

 - Ubuntu 16.04.1 (64bit)
 - Xubuntu 16.04.1 (32bit)

Everything is working as expected.

regards

Matthias


Am 03.10.2016 um 13:29 schrieb Mechtilde:
> Hello,
>
> I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.
>
> I did also some work with it without problems
>
> Regards
>
> Mechtilde
>
> Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
>>> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
 I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
 there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
 until we have a complete release candidate.
>>> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows
>>> builds.
>> I've done the following for testing:
>>
>> Installation
>> 
>>
>> Windows 10
>> --
>> Windows deOK
>> Windows de langpackOK
>> Windows en-USOK
>> Windows en-US langpackOK
>>
>> Fedora 21 64-bit
>> 
>> Linux x86-64 rpm deOK
>> Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK
>> Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK
>> Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK
>>
>> Quick test
>> ==
>> Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK
>>
>> Release data
>> 
>> Version number, "About" dialogOK
>>
>> Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small,
>> this quick test should be good enough.
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

[Peter Kovacs]

+1 :)

Keith N. McKenna  schrieb am Mo., 3. Okt. 2016,
18:09:

> Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
> >> There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release
> >> manager to decide on them.
> >
> > If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with
> > me.
> >
> >
> > Regards
> >
> +1 here also
>
> Keith
>
> --

Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
verhandeln.

Re: Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE

[Peter Kovacs]

Well, I would like to check first if the report is an issue or not. I am
happy with the Answer as is for now.

John D'Orazio  schrieb am Mo., 3.
Okt. 2016, 16:53:

> >
> > does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel?
> >>
> >
> > Create a new dialog in the Basic IDE or open an existing dialog. (Please
> > note that the dialogs that comes with AOO are loaded in read-only mode.
> So
> > you don't can open the properties for a control.)
> > Select a control and open the properties for it.
> >
> I believe he is referring to the source code, to fix a bad string. He is
> asking, if I understand correctly, which module in the source code is used
> for building the AOO dialogs...
>
> Regards, John
>
-- 

Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
verhandeln.

Re: Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell

[Yakov Reztsov]

Hello,
I think you can make Georgia hunspell dictionary in UTF-8 encoding.
After creating the hunspell dictionary it needs to be packed to OpenOffice 
extension like this:
http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/english-dictionaries-apache-openoffice
The author of this expansion has created a utility for easy editing OpenOffice 
dictionary -  Proofing Tool GUI  
http://marcoagpinto.cidadevirtual.pt/proofingtoolgui.html  



>Понедельник,  3 октября 2016, 14:42 +03:00 от Giorgi Vakhtangishvili <>:
>
>Hello OpenOffice,
>
>I'm Giorgi Vakhtangishvili, writing to you from Tbilisi, Georgia. Didn't
>know who to write to and on which mail, so here I am.
>
>We are the team of developers who work on different RnD projects from
>Georgia.
>
>The reason for me writing to you is that, there's is one big problem in
>Georgia, that we are now trying to solve and we think that you can help us
>a lot:
>
>As you may know, Georgia has it's own alphabet but there is no support of
>our written language's SpellChecker in such big softwares, like OpenOffice,
>LibreOffice, Chrome, Opera, Safari and etc. These softwares are used in
>Georgia everyday and there's a big demand for integration of Georgian Spell
>Checker in them.
>
>Currently, our team is working on it and as one of the options of
>fulfilling our goal is to create Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell's Open
>Source library. As long as, Hunspell is used by the Softwares mentioned
>above, it will automatically add support of Georgian spell checker to them
>too.
>
>This is the reason I'm writing to you.
>
>What do you think about it ? Are we on a right track ?
>We tried to contact to Nemeth but unfortunately got no answer from him. Can
>you help me with contacting Hunspell team ?
>Is it possible to contribute to Hunspell Library and add Georgian spell
>checker to it ?
>What are the steps and requirements to get through this process ?
>
>
>We hope for your support and guidance.
>
>Regards,
>Giorgi Vakhtangishvili.
>
>-- 
>*Giorgi Vakhtangishvili*
>
>*CTO, Developer*
>
>*GeoLab*
>
>*g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge < g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge >*


-- 

Yakov Reztsov

Re: Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE

[John D'Orazio]

>
> does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel?
>>
>
> Create a new dialog in the Basic IDE or open an existing dialog. (Please
> note that the dialogs that comes with AOO are loaded in read-only mode. So
> you don't can open the properties for a control.)
> Select a control and open the properties for it.
>
I believe he is referring to the source code, to fix a bad string. He is
asking, if I understand correctly, which module in the source code is used
for building the AOO dialogs...

Regards, John

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Jose R R]

Out of an irresistible curiosity I built my own ApacheOO in Debian
Unstable (Sid). It took me several build iterations, starting out with
trunk and proceeding to:

svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/branches/AOO413



On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 4:50 AM, Rory O'Farrell  wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:29:26 +0200
> Mechtilde  wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.
>>
>> I did also some work with it without problems
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Mechtilde
>
>
> I installed the Linux x86-64 DEB en-GB and am using it for routine text 
> editing on reasonable sized files (70-300K words) and a little spreadsheet 
> work.  Running on Xubuntu 16.04.
> Working correctly.
>
> Rory
>
>
>>
>> Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus:
>> > Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
>> >> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>> >>> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
>> >>> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
>> >>> until we have a complete release candidate.
>> >>
>> >> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows
>> >> builds.
>> >
>> > I've done the following for testing:
>> >
>> > Installation
>> > 
>> >
>> > Windows 10
>> > --
>> > Windows deOK
>> > Windows de langpackOK
>> > Windows en-USOK
>> > Windows en-US langpackOK
>> >
>> > Fedora 21 64-bit
>> > 
>> > Linux x86-64 rpm deOK
>> > Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK
>> > Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK
>> > Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK
>> >
>> > Quick test
>> > ==
>> > Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK
>> >
>> > Release data
>> > 
>> > Version number, "About" dialogOK
>> >
>> > Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small,
>> > this quick test should be good enough.
>> >
>> > Marcus
>> >
patched epm-3.7 (otherwise, produces 'intel' instead of 'amd64' and
won't install in Debian AMD64)

autoconf

 ./configure --with-build-version="$(date +"%Y-%m-%d %H:%M") `uname
-nsm`" --with-dmake-path=/usr/local/bin/dmake --with-epm=/usr/bin/epm
--disable-odk --enable-graphite --enable-category-b
--enable-bundled-dictionaries --enable-pdfimport
--enable-wiki-publisher --with-package-format="rpm deb"
--with-lang="en-US ru de"

./bootstrap

sudo su (as this did not work: fakeroot /usr/bin/ksh )

source ./LinuxX86-64Env.Set.sh

cd instsetoo_native/

build --all -P8 -- -P8

Love the generated OO in Debian ;-)  using with approximately 70 k
word document and it's cool.

< https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CtxF6h8VUAEdnhx.png:large >

Thank you for wonderful software release.


Best Professional Regards.

-- 
Jose R R
http://metztli.it
-
Try at no charge http://b2evolution.net for http://OpenShift.com PaaS
-
from our GitHub http://Nepohualtzintzin.com repository. Cloud the easy way!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Rory O'Farrell]

On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:29:26 +0200
Mechtilde  wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.
> 
> I did also some work with it without problems
> 
> Regards
> 
> Mechtilde


I installed the Linux x86-64 DEB en-GB and am using it for routine text editing 
on reasonable sized files (70-300K words) and a little spreadsheet work.  
Running on Xubuntu 16.04.
Working correctly.

Rory


> 
> Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus:
> > Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
> >> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
> >>> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
> >>> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
> >>> until we have a complete release candidate.
> >>
> >> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows
> >> builds.
> > 
> > I've done the following for testing:
> > 
> > Installation
> > 
> > 
> > Windows 10
> > --
> > Windows deOK
> > Windows de langpackOK
> > Windows en-USOK
> > Windows en-US langpackOK
> > 
> > Fedora 21 64-bit
> > 
> > Linux x86-64 rpm deOK
> > Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK
> > Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK
> > Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK
> > 
> > Quick test
> > ==
> > Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK
> > 
> > Release data
> > 
> > Version number, "About" dialogOK
> > 
> > Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small,
> > this quick test should be good enough.
> > 
> > Marcus
> > 
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Mechtilde Stehmann
> --
> ## Apache OpenOffice.org
> ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
> ## Debian
> ## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
> ## PGP encryption welcome
> ## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F
> 


-- 
Rory O'Farrell 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell

[Giorgi Vakhtangishvili]

Hello OpenOffice,

I'm Giorgi Vakhtangishvili, writing to you from Tbilisi, Georgia. Didn't
know who to write to and on which mail, so here I am.

We are the team of developers who work on different RnD projects from
Georgia.

The reason for me writing to you is that, there's is one big problem in
Georgia, that we are now trying to solve and we think that you can help us
a lot:

As you may know, Georgia has it's own alphabet but there is no support of
our written language's SpellChecker in such big softwares, like OpenOffice,
LibreOffice, Chrome, Opera, Safari and etc. These softwares are used in
Georgia everyday and there's a big demand for integration of Georgian Spell
Checker in them.

Currently, our team is working on it and as one of the options of
fulfilling our goal is to create Georgian Dictionary in Hunspell's Open
Source library. As long as, Hunspell is used by the Softwares mentioned
above, it will automatically add support of Georgian spell checker to them
too.

This is the reason I'm writing to you.

What do you think about it ? Are we on a right track ?
We tried to contact to Nemeth but unfortunately got no answer from him. Can
you help me with contacting Hunspell team ?
Is it possible to contribute to Hunspell Library and add Georgian spell
checker to it ?
What are the steps and requirements to get through this process ?


We hope for your support and guidance.

Regards,
Giorgi Vakhtangishvili.

-- 
*Giorgi Vakhtangishvili*

*CTO, Developer*

*GeoLab*

*g.vakhtangishv...@geolab.edu.ge *

Re: Updates

[Marcus]

Am 10/02/2016 10:57 PM, schrieb David Batchelor:

I am using open office 4.1.2 and I love this product very much.


thank you :-) We appreciate this very much.


How do I automatically or manually update any and all new versions that may
come in the future?


For a new version you need to uninstall the old and then install the new 
version.



Will I be notified by open office?


Yes. When OpenOffice is running there will be a little yellow update 
notification shown in the top right corner.



What steps do I need to take to do any updates, as I want to insure I am
using the latest version at all times?


In order to see the currently installed version, you can have a look 
into the About dialog (see menu "Help - About OpenOffice").


HTH

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Testing 4.1.3

[Mechtilde]

Hello,

I did the same tests for Linux x86-64 deb de.

I did also some work with it without problems

Regards

Mechtilde

Am 03.10.2016 um 12:57 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 09/25/2016 08:33 PM, schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 09/25/2016 04:33 PM, schrieb Patricia Shanahan:
>>> I suggest that people start downloading and testing 4.1.3 as soon as
>>> there are binaries they can run. I can't start the formal vote period
>>> until we have a complete release candidate.
>>
>> thanks for the pointer, I'll wait for the Linux 64-bit and Windows
>> builds.
> 
> I've done the following for testing:
> 
> Installation
> 
> 
> Windows 10
> --
> Windows deOK
> Windows de langpackOK
> Windows en-USOK
> Windows en-US langpackOK
> 
> Fedora 21 64-bit
> 
> Linux x86-64 rpm deOK
> Linux x86-64 rpm de langpackOK
> Linux x86-64 rpm en-USOK
> Linux x86-64 rpm en-US langpackOK
> 
> Quick test
> ==
> Starting, creating files, saving, copy & pasting and quittingOK
> 
> Release data
> 
> Version number, "About" dialogOK
> 
> Of course not a full QA test round. However, as the fixes are small,
> this quick test should be good enough.
> 
> Marcus
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 

-- 
Mechtilde Stehmann
--
## Apache OpenOffice.org
## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows
## Debian
## Loook, calender-exchange-provider, libreoffice-canzeley-client
## PGP encryption welcome
## Key-ID 0x141AAD7F



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [DISCUSS] 4.1.4 Release Manager?

[Marcus]

Am 09/30/2016 07:15 PM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:

Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 03:58:11PM -0700, Patricia Shanahan wrote:

There are now release blocker requests for 4.1.4, so we need a release
manager to decide on them.


If nobody steps in, and/or nobody has any objection, you can count with
me.


I would be very happy to have Ariel as Release Manager.


+1 me, too. :-)

Marcus


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE

[Mathias Röllig]

Hello Peter!


does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel?


Create a new dialog in the Basic IDE or open an existing dialog. (Please 
note that the dialogs that comes with AOO are loaded in read-only mode. 
So you don't can open the properties for a control.)

Select a control and open the properties for it.

Regards, Mathias


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: In regards to Open Office

[Peter Kovacs]

+1

exactly, that's what I meant

and a little bit is my opinion also:
MS is not longer a _fundamental_ opponent of free software more

and a very little bit is my opinion also:
MS is one of our "Platinum sponsors" and it is not a good style blindly to 
grumble about MS
  



Greetings,
Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: In regards to Open Office

[Jörg Schmidt]

 

> -Original Message-
> From: Xen [mailto:l...@xenhideout.nl] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2016 7:29 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re:  In regards to Open Office
> 
> Rory O'Farrell schreef op 02-10-2016 15:59:
> > Top posting:
> > 
> > This thread is going off at half cock!
> > 
> > Hagar's implied point was that any change in editor is 
> almost certain
> > to cause some alteration (greater or lesser) in formatting. 
>  Why this
> > should be and whether the precise file format is 
> responsible is hardly
> > relevant.
> > 
> > Rory
> 
> Jörg was only mentioning that the ODF format was also 
> designed without 
> compatibility in mind, and that it is an equal situation. 

exactly, that's what I meant

and a little bit is my opinion also:
MS is not longer a _fundamental_ opponent of free software more

and a very little bit is my opinion also:
MS is one of our "Platinum sponsors" and it is not a good style blindly to 
grumble about MS
 


Greetings,
Jörg


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Issue 63419 - New dialog control property Multiline has bad name in IDE

[Peter Kovacs]

Hi,

does someon know where to find the IDE dialog Properties panel?

I do not know what the modul udk is?


I am not sure if this became obsolete with time.

all the best
Peter