Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
We must not block 4.1.4. We must release soon. Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 14, 2017, at 7:36 PM, Damjan Jovanovicwrote: > > The process is, we vote, then get Infra to switch us. > > Many big and small Apache projects have switched to Git, eg. Apache Commons. > >> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: >> >> I would like to add one more condition: We should not move until the >> process we will use has been applied successfully to smaller projects. >> >> I am relatively neutral on the choice of repository, and a lot of people >> seem to like Git. >> >> >>> On 9/14/2017 11:16 AM, Marcus wrote: >>> >>> Even when I'm not a real developer, please let me add some points: >>> >>> IMHO we could switch when >>> >>> - ASF Infra can and will support it >>> - the CMS (it manages the webpages) is supporting Git >>> - the big majority of us is wanting Git >>> - it is known how and save that the SVN commit history can be migrated >>> to Git >>> >>> PS: >>> As Apache project the code has to be at the ASF. I think it's not >>> possible to store it somewhere else like, e.g., GitHub. >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> Am 14.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > On 14.09.2017 13:10, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > > Hi > > Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's > source? > > I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, > by > far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and > IDEs > support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). > It > would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, > git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, > it > would integrate with GitHub better, etc. > > What do people think? > > Damjan > > As much as I prefer GIT for Codemaintenance, I think the central REPO should be maintained by Apache Infra. If Infra can move to git, fine. If they do not support it, it is also fine to me. I am at -1 to have our official REPO on GITHUB or another service provider. And I am not sure if we can not work around the problem to commit to SVN from a GIT repo. Have to check. All the best Peter >>> >>> >>> - >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
The process is, we vote, then get Infra to switch us. Many big and small Apache projects have switched to Git, eg. Apache Commons. On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 4:26 AM, Patricia Shanahanwrote: > I would like to add one more condition: We should not move until the > process we will use has been applied successfully to smaller projects. > > I am relatively neutral on the choice of repository, and a lot of people > seem to like Git. > > > On 9/14/2017 11:16 AM, Marcus wrote: > >> Even when I'm not a real developer, please let me add some points: >> >> IMHO we could switch when >> >> - ASF Infra can and will support it >> - the CMS (it manages the webpages) is supporting Git >> - the big majority of us is wanting Git >> - it is known how and save that the SVN commit history can be migrated >>to Git >> >> PS: >> As Apache project the code has to be at the ASF. I think it's not >> possible to store it somewhere else like, e.g., GitHub. >> >> Marcus >> >> >> >> Am 14.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> >>> >>> On 14.09.2017 13:10, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> Hi Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). It would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, it would integrate with GitHub better, etc. What do people think? Damjan As much as I prefer GIT for Codemaintenance, I think the central REPO >>> should be maintained by Apache Infra. >>> If Infra can move to git, fine. If they do not support it, it is also >>> fine to me. >>> >>> I am at -1 to have our official REPO on GITHUB or another service >>> provider. >>> >>> And I am not sure if we can not work around the problem to commit to SVN >>> from a GIT repo. >>> Have to check. >>> >>> >>> All the best >>> Peter >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
I would like to add one more condition: We should not move until the process we will use has been applied successfully to smaller projects. I am relatively neutral on the choice of repository, and a lot of people seem to like Git. On 9/14/2017 11:16 AM, Marcus wrote: Even when I'm not a real developer, please let me add some points: IMHO we could switch when - ASF Infra can and will support it - the CMS (it manages the webpages) is supporting Git - the big majority of us is wanting Git - it is known how and save that the SVN commit history can be migrated to Git PS: As Apache project the code has to be at the ASF. I think it's not possible to store it somewhere else like, e.g., GitHub. Marcus Am 14.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 14.09.2017 13:10, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). It would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, it would integrate with GitHub better, etc. What do people think? Damjan As much as I prefer GIT for Codemaintenance, I think the central REPO should be maintained by Apache Infra. If Infra can move to git, fine. If they do not support it, it is also fine to me. I am at -1 to have our official REPO on GITHUB or another service provider. And I am not sure if we can not work around the problem to commit to SVN from a GIT repo. Have to check. All the best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:16 AM, Marcuswrote: > > Even when I'm not a real developer, please let me add some points: > > IMHO we could switch when > > - ASF Infra can and will support it > - the CMS (it manages the webpages) is supporting Git > - the big majority of us is wanting Git > - it is known how and save that the SVN commit history can be migrated > to Git > > PS: > As Apache project the code has to be at the ASF. I think it's not possible to > store it somewhere else like, e.g., GitHub. GitBox is being experimented with and there are a few projects that use GitHub with the mirror being on the Apache side. Infra is not offering this to all. Ask Greg Stein about it. Regards, Dave > > Marcus > > > > Am 14.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> On 14.09.2017 13:10, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? >>> >>> I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by >>> far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs >>> support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). It >>> would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, >>> git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, it >>> would integrate with GitHub better, etc. >>> >>> What do people think? >>> >>> Damjan >>> >> As much as I prefer GIT for Codemaintenance, I think the central REPO should >> be maintained by Apache Infra. >> If Infra can move to git, fine. If they do not support it, it is also fine >> to me. >> I am at -1 to have our official REPO on GITHUB or another service provider. >> And I am not sure if we can not work around the problem to commit to SVN >> from a GIT repo. >> Have to check. >> All the best >> Peter > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
Even when I'm not a real developer, please let me add some points: IMHO we could switch when - ASF Infra can and will support it - the CMS (it manages the webpages) is supporting Git - the big majority of us is wanting Git - it is known how and save that the SVN commit history can be migrated to Git PS: As Apache project the code has to be at the ASF. I think it's not possible to store it somewhere else like, e.g., GitHub. Marcus Am 14.09.2017 um 19:24 schrieb Peter Kovacs: On 14.09.2017 13:10, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). It would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, it would integrate with GitHub better, etc. What do people think? Damjan As much as I prefer GIT for Codemaintenance, I think the central REPO should be maintained by Apache Infra. If Infra can move to git, fine. If they do not support it, it is also fine to me. I am at -1 to have our official REPO on GITHUB or another service provider. And I am not sure if we can not work around the problem to commit to SVN from a GIT repo. Have to check. All the best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
Hi, FWIW we already have an official git mirror of our svn repository. Do a git clone git://git.apache.org/openoffice.git to check it out. Such a repo is currently read-only of course until the project switches officially to git. Herbert On 09/14/2017 11:10 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > Hi > > Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? > > I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by > far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs > support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). It > would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, > git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, it > would integrate with GitHub better, etc. > > What do people think? > > Damjan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
On 14.09.2017 13:10, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). It would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, it would integrate with GitHub better, etc. What do people think? Damjan As much as I prefer GIT for Codemaintenance, I think the central REPO should be maintained by Apache Infra. If Infra can move to git, fine. If they do not support it, it is also fine to me. I am at -1 to have our official REPO on GITHUB or another service provider. And I am not sure if we can not work around the problem to commit to SVN from a GIT repo. Have to check. All the best Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
+1 Am .09.2017, 13:10 Uhr, schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: Hi Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). It would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, it would integrate with GitHub better, etc. What do people think? Damjan -- My introduction https://youtu.be/Ln4vly5sxYU - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
Hi - Here is a difference between Git and SVN that could be important. In GIT you check out the whole repository. In SVN you can check out parts. Another would be does SVN vs. GIT prevent new developers from volunteering? Historical note - when OpenOffice came to Apache it had just been moved to Mercurial... Regards, Dave > On Sep 14, 2017, at 6:32 AM, Damjan Jovanovicwrote: > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: > >> I know Git is the repository-of-the-decade, and therefore a switch to it >> is probably inevitable, just like the switch from RCS to SCCS and from SCCS >> to Subversion. >> >> Just as a matter of curiosity, which IDE's do not support Subversion? I >> know I was using a it with Eclipse before I heard of Git. >> >> > Visual Studio Code only supports Git out of the box. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Patricia Shanahanwrote: > I know Git is the repository-of-the-decade, and therefore a switch to it > is probably inevitable, just like the switch from RCS to SCCS and from SCCS > to Subversion. > > Just as a matter of curiosity, which IDE's do not support Subversion? I > know I was using a it with Eclipse before I heard of Git. > > Visual Studio Code only supports Git out of the box.
Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?
I know Git is the repository-of-the-decade, and therefore a switch to it is probably inevitable, just like the switch from RCS to SCCS and from SCCS to Subversion. Just as a matter of curiosity, which IDE's do not support Subversion? I know I was using a it with Eclipse before I heard of Git. On 9/14/2017 4:10 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: Hi Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). It would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, it would integrate with GitHub better, etc. What do people think? Damjan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
[Discussion] Switch to Git?
Hi Can we please switch to using Git instead of Subversion for AOO's source? I don't know how much justification you want/need. Git is huge nowdays, by far the most popular VCS worldwide, the one most developers know and IDEs support (https://rhodecode.com/insights/version-control-systems-2016). It would help us with local branches for testing and experimenting offline, git bisect for regression testing, it's efficient with large projects, it would integrate with GitHub better, etc. What do people think? Damjan