German language link in EN page for install instructions
The AOO installation page https://www.openoffice.org/download/common/instructions.html#apple has a link about Gatekeeper on OSX which links to a German language Apple support page. Can this link please be changed to point to the English language version, currently at https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT202491 Cheers -- David Robley What goes up has probably been doused with petrol. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
> On November 18, 2018 at 12:00 AM Branko Čibej wrote: > For debugging, I suggest using cURL instead of OO, for example: > > curl -sviI https://www.openoffice.org/ The output is below * Trying 95.216.24.32... * Connected to www.openoffice.org (95.216.24.32) port 443 (#0) * found 148 certificates in /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt * found 604 certificates in /etc/ssl/certs * ALPN, offering http/1.1 * SSL connection using TLS1.2 / ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 *server certificate verification OK *server certificate status verification SKIPPED *common name: *.openoffice.org (matched) *server certificate expiration date OK *server certificate activation date OK *certificate public key: RSA *certificate version: #3 *subject: OU=Domain Control Validated,OU=EssentialSSL Wildcard,CN=*.openoffice.org *start date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 00:00:00 GMT *expire date: Sat, 18 Jul 2020 23:59:59 GMT *issuer: C=GB,ST=Greater Manchester,L=Salford,O=COMODO CA Limited,CN=COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA *compression: NULL * ALPN, server accepted to use http/1.1 > HEAD / HTTP/1.1 > Host: www.openoffice.org > User-Agent: curl/7.47.0 > Accept: */* > < HTTP/1.1 200 OK HTTP/1.1 200 OK < Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 01:11:37 GMT Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 01:11:37 GMT < Server: Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu) Server: Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu) < Accept-Ranges: bytes Accept-Ranges: bytes < Vary: Accept-Encoding Vary: Accept-Encoding < Content-Type: text/html Content-Type: text/html < * Connection #0 to host www.openoffice.org left intact - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
using open office
Hello, I would like to use OpenOffice to write a book and publish it on amazon, do I have to pay any fees or royalties to yourselves? Do I need a licence? Thank you very muchI look forward to hearing from you
Re: Check for Updates broken?
On 17.11.2018 18:32, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Dave Fisher wrote: >> I’ve been on with Infra on HipChat and both servers are the same with >> the same content internally, > > Yes, I don't see this as a major issue either. It is probably too > early for Infra to jump in, since we haven't identified major > network-related issues so far (yes, one of the two server does not > respond to ping and traceroute, but I can get updates from it > nevertheless). I mean, of course it doesn't harm but we need to shed > more light, see below. > >> I’m being asked for IP addresses to share so that can see if there is >> an IP ban happening. > > A ban is for sure not the case. > > Indeed, I have interesting news: I can reproduce the bug on an Ubuntu > system. My best bet at the moment is that something in the SSL > negotiation is wrong. > > A nice additional benefit is that this gives us a simple way to > reproduce the bug, equivalent to the update notification. > > $ soffice https://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > > (this fails on Ubuntu, succeeds on Fedora) > > Note that > > $ soffice https://www.google.com/ > > will work in all cases (so this is not an HTTPS bug per se) and > > $ soffice http://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > > will work in all cases (so this not a network issue but rather an SSL > issue). > > Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't > get updates at least confirm the three results above, i.e., that only > the first one fails? > > Further tests show that problematic systems have issues with ASF sites > in HTTPS, like: > $ soffice https://www.apache.org/ # Fails > $ soffice http://www.apache.org/ # Succeeds > $ soffice https://www.openoffice.org/ # Fails > $ soffice http://www.openoffice.org/ # Succeeds > $ soffice https://... # Succeeds for any site I put there, except ASF > sites, but I'd love to see a non-ASF example of a failing HTTPS site. > > If this is confirmed we are really close to a point where we could > actually get useful information from Infra. Note that all the sites that fail in your list have wildcard certificates — CN=*.apache.org for the Apache sites and CN=*.openoffice.org for the OO sites. This may be related to wildcard cert support in OpenSSL/LibreSSL/GnuTLS/whateveryou'reusing on the affected systems. Correlating this with the SSL library name and version would be useful. (I'm on macOS, so using Apple's crypto library which does support wildcard certs). For debugging, I suggest using cURL instead of OO, for example: curl -sviI https://www.openoffice.org/ -- Brane - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
> > $ soffice https://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > > (this fails on Ubuntu, succeeds on Fedora) > > Note that > > $ soffice https://www.google.com/ > > will work in all cases (so this is not an HTTPS bug per se) and > > $ soffice http://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > > will work in all cases (so this not a network issue but rather an SSL > issue). > > Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't get > updates at least confirm the three results above, i.e., that only the > first one fails? I can confirm the behavior with AOO 4.1.6 on Windows 19 Keith > > Further tests show that problematic systems have issues with ASF sites > in HTTPS, like: > $ soffice https://www.apache.org/ # Fails > $ soffice http://www.apache.org/ # Succeeds > $ soffice https://www.openoffice.org/ # Fails > $ soffice http://www.openoffice.org/ # Succeeds > $ soffice https://... # Succeeds for any site I put there, except ASF > sites, but I'd love to see a non-ASF example of a failing HTTPS site. > > If this is confirmed we are really close to a point where we could > actually get useful information from Infra. > > Regards, > Andrea. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Check for Updates broken?
> On November 17, 2018 at 5:32 PM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > A nice additional benefit is that this gives us a simple way to > reproduce the bug, equivalent to the update notification. > > $ soffice https://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > (this fails on Ubuntu, succeeds on Fedora) > > Note that > > $ soffice https://www.google.com/ > will work in all cases (so this is not an HTTPS bug per se) and > > $ soffice http://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > will work in all cases (so this not a network issue but rather an SSL > issue). > > Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't get > updates at least confirm the three results above, i.e., that only the > first one fails? Confirmed that only the first one fails. I always get the message (even when it didn't fail to open the page) Gtk-Message: Failed to load module "overlay-scrollbar" ** (soffice:10458): WARNING **: Unknown type: GailWindow > Further tests show that problematic systems have issues with ASF sites > in HTTPS, like: > $ soffice https://www.apache.org/ # Fails > $ soffice http://www.apache.org/ # Succeeds > $ soffice https://www.openoffice.org/ # Fails > $ soffice http://www.openoffice.org/ # Succeeds > $ soffice https://... # Succeeds for any site I put there, except ASF > sites, but I'd love to see a non-ASF example of a failing HTTPS site. Confirmed. HTTPS links fail, HTTP succeed > If this is confirmed we are really close to a point where we could > actually get useful information from Infra. Thank you for your persistent and systematic investigation! ;) Regards, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
Just out of interest: AOO420m1(Build:9800) - Rev. 1844412 2018-10-20_11:36:04 - Rev. 1844412 running on Xubuntu 18.04.1 64 bit (fully updated), all four URLs below work Rory On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 18:42:57 +0100 Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Andrea, > > Am 17.11.18 um 18:32 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > > Dave Fisher wrote: > >> I’ve been on with Infra on HipChat and both servers are the same with > >> the same content internally, > > > > Yes, I don't see this as a major issue either. It is probably too > > early for Infra to jump in, since we haven't identified major > > network-related issues so far (yes, one of the two server does not > > respond to ping and traceroute, but I can get updates from it > > nevertheless). I mean, of course it doesn't harm but we need to shed > > more light, see below. > > > >> I’m being asked for IP addresses to share so that can see if there is > >> an IP ban happening. > > > > A ban is for sure not the case. > > > > Indeed, I have interesting news: I can reproduce the bug on an Ubuntu > > system. My best bet at the moment is that something in the SSL > > negotiation is wrong. > > > > A nice additional benefit is that this gives us a simple way to > > reproduce the bug, equivalent to the update notification. > > > > $ soffice https://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > > > > (this fails on Ubuntu, succeeds on Fedora) > > > > Note that > > > > $ soffice https://www.google.com/ > > > > will work in all cases (so this is not an HTTPS bug per se) and > > > > $ soffice http://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > > > > will work in all cases (so this not a network issue but rather an SSL > > issue). > > > > Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't > > get updates at least confirm the three results above, i.e., that only > > the first one fails? > > > > Further tests show that problematic systems have issues with ASF sites > > in HTTPS, like: > > $ soffice https://www.apache.org/ # Fails > > $ soffice http://www.apache.org/ # Succeeds > > $ soffice https://www.openoffice.org/ # Fails > > $ soffice http://www.openoffice.org/ # Succeeds > > $ soffice https://... # Succeeds for any site I put there, except ASF > > sites, but I'd love to see a non-ASF example of a failing HTTPS site. > > > > If this is confirmed we are really close to a point where we could > > actually get useful information from Infra. > > I can confirm this behavior with AOO 4.1.6 on Ubuntu 16.04.5. > > Regards, > > Matthias > > > > > Regards, > > Andrea. > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > -- Rory O'Farrell - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
Hi Andrea, Am 17.11.18 um 18:32 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Dave Fisher wrote: >> I’ve been on with Infra on HipChat and both servers are the same with >> the same content internally, > > Yes, I don't see this as a major issue either. It is probably too > early for Infra to jump in, since we haven't identified major > network-related issues so far (yes, one of the two server does not > respond to ping and traceroute, but I can get updates from it > nevertheless). I mean, of course it doesn't harm but we need to shed > more light, see below. > >> I’m being asked for IP addresses to share so that can see if there is >> an IP ban happening. > > A ban is for sure not the case. > > Indeed, I have interesting news: I can reproduce the bug on an Ubuntu > system. My best bet at the moment is that something in the SSL > negotiation is wrong. > > A nice additional benefit is that this gives us a simple way to > reproduce the bug, equivalent to the update notification. > > $ soffice https://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > > (this fails on Ubuntu, succeeds on Fedora) > > Note that > > $ soffice https://www.google.com/ > > will work in all cases (so this is not an HTTPS bug per se) and > > $ soffice http://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html > > will work in all cases (so this not a network issue but rather an SSL > issue). > > Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't > get updates at least confirm the three results above, i.e., that only > the first one fails? > > Further tests show that problematic systems have issues with ASF sites > in HTTPS, like: > $ soffice https://www.apache.org/ # Fails > $ soffice http://www.apache.org/ # Succeeds > $ soffice https://www.openoffice.org/ # Fails > $ soffice http://www.openoffice.org/ # Succeeds > $ soffice https://... # Succeeds for any site I put there, except ASF > sites, but I'd love to see a non-ASF example of a failing HTTPS site. > > If this is confirmed we are really close to a point where we could > actually get useful information from Infra. I can confirm this behavior with AOO 4.1.6 on Ubuntu 16.04.5. Regards, Matthias > > Regards, > Andrea. > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Check for Updates broken?
Dave Fisher wrote: I’ve been on with Infra on HipChat and both servers are the same with the same content internally, Yes, I don't see this as a major issue either. It is probably too early for Infra to jump in, since we haven't identified major network-related issues so far (yes, one of the two server does not respond to ping and traceroute, but I can get updates from it nevertheless). I mean, of course it doesn't harm but we need to shed more light, see below. I’m being asked for IP addresses to share so that can see if there is an IP ban happening. A ban is for sure not the case. Indeed, I have interesting news: I can reproduce the bug on an Ubuntu system. My best bet at the moment is that something in the SSL negotiation is wrong. A nice additional benefit is that this gives us a simple way to reproduce the bug, equivalent to the update notification. $ soffice https://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html (this fails on Ubuntu, succeeds on Fedora) Note that $ soffice https://www.google.com/ will work in all cases (so this is not an HTTPS bug per se) and $ soffice http://ooo-updates.apache.org/index.html will work in all cases (so this not a network issue but rather an SSL issue). Now, debugging SSL issues is not easy, but can the people who don't get updates at least confirm the three results above, i.e., that only the first one fails? Further tests show that problematic systems have issues with ASF sites in HTTPS, like: $ soffice https://www.apache.org/ # Fails $ soffice http://www.apache.org/ # Succeeds $ soffice https://www.openoffice.org/ # Fails $ soffice http://www.openoffice.org/ # Succeeds $ soffice https://... # Succeeds for any site I put there, except ASF sites, but I'd love to see a non-ASF example of a failing HTTPS site. If this is confirmed we are really close to a point where we could actually get useful information from Infra. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
It is weird. They checked the logs and since the last log role: since the last log roll, the 40 box had 3667 hits to aoo415/check.Update and the 95 box got 6570 Regards, Dave > On Nov 17, 2018, at 8:15 AM, Pedro Lino wrote: > > Hi Dave > >> I’ve been on with Infra on HipChat and both servers are the same with the >> same content internally, > > But some configuration must be different because one responds to pings and > the other doesn't > >> I’m being asked for IP addresses to share so that can see if there is an IP >> ban happening. There are circumstances where that would happen in only one >> location. > > This happens both at home and at work with different ISPs > I'm sending my current IP by private email. > > Thanks! > Pedro > >>> On Nov 17, 2018, at 4:31 AM, Matthias Seidel >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Pedro, >>> >>> Am 17.11.18 um 11:26 schrieb Pedro Lino: > On November 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM Andrea Pescetti > wrote: > Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to > the OpenOffice dialog windows in Preferences - OpenOffice - General, you > can open URLs directly from within the application. I use that feature daily to edit files in a webdav folder and it does work > If you open (File - Open, then paste the URL in the filename field) > > https://ooo-updates.apache.org/aoo416/index.html > > can OpenOffice successfully retrieve the document? No. I get exactly the same error message shown in the Check for Updates dialog "Error reading data from the Internet. Server error message: ." >>> >>> I get exactly the same with AOO 4.1.6. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> Regards, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >> >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
Re: Check for Updates broken?
Hi Dave > I’ve been on with Infra on HipChat and both servers are the same with the > same content internally, But some configuration must be different because one responds to pings and the other doesn't > I’m being asked for IP addresses to share so that can see if there is an IP > ban happening. There are circumstances where that would happen in only one > location. This happens both at home and at work with different ISPs I'm sending my current IP by private email. Thanks! Pedro > > On Nov 17, 2018, at 4:31 AM, Matthias Seidel > > wrote: > > > > Hi Pedro, > > > > Am 17.11.18 um 11:26 schrieb Pedro Lino: > >>> On November 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM Andrea Pescetti > >>> wrote: > >>> Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to > >>> the OpenOffice dialog windows in Preferences - OpenOffice - General, you > >>> can open URLs directly from within the application. > >> I use that feature daily to edit files in a webdav folder and it does work > >> > >>> If you open (File - Open, then paste the URL in the filename field) > >>> > >>> https://ooo-updates.apache.org/aoo416/index.html > >>> > >>> can OpenOffice successfully retrieve the document? > >> No. I get exactly the same error message shown in the Check for Updates > >> dialog > >> "Error reading data from the Internet. > >> Server error message: ." > > > > I get exactly the same with AOO 4.1.6. > > > > Regards, > > > >Matthias > > > >> > >> Regards, > >> Pedro > >> > >> - > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >> > >> > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
Hi - I’ve been on with Infra on HipChat and both servers are the same with the same content internally, I’m being asked for IP addresses to share so that can see if there is an IP ban happening. There are circumstances where that would happen in only one location. Regards, Dave > On Nov 17, 2018, at 4:31 AM, Matthias Seidel > wrote: > > Hi Pedro, > > Am 17.11.18 um 11:26 schrieb Pedro Lino: >>> On November 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>> Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to >>> the OpenOffice dialog windows in Preferences - OpenOffice - General, you >>> can open URLs directly from within the application. >> I use that feature daily to edit files in a webdav folder and it does work >> >>> If you open (File - Open, then paste the URL in the filename field) >>> >>> https://ooo-updates.apache.org/aoo416/index.html >>> >>> can OpenOffice successfully retrieve the document? >> No. I get exactly the same error message shown in the Check for Updates >> dialog >> "Error reading data from the Internet. >> Server error message: ." > > I get exactly the same with AOO 4.1.6. > > Regards, > >Matthias > >> >> Regards, >> Pedro >> >> - >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
Hi Pedro, Am 17.11.18 um 11:26 schrieb Pedro Lino: >> On November 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to >> the OpenOffice dialog windows in Preferences - OpenOffice - General, you >> can open URLs directly from within the application. > I use that feature daily to edit files in a webdav folder and it does work > >> If you open (File - Open, then paste the URL in the filename field) >> >> https://ooo-updates.apache.org/aoo416/index.html >> >> can OpenOffice successfully retrieve the document? > No. I get exactly the same error message shown in the Check for Updates dialog > "Error reading data from the Internet. > Server error message: ." I get exactly the same with AOO 4.1.6. Regards, Matthias > > Regards, > Pedro > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1 - Vote resolution
Am 17.11.18 um 12:45 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 17.11.18 um 10:09 schrieb Marcus: Am 16.11.18 um 22:44 schrieb Kay Schenk: On 11/14/2018 01:09 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 14.11.18 um 18:05 schrieb Kay Schenk: I got started a little on this yesterday. Maybe some guidance on fixed bugs that need emphasis and any dictionary updates and anything else. I have some time this week here and there. thanks Kay, this would be great. If you want I can check the notes and integrate the final version within the download webpage on Saturday. Marcus Hi Marcus. Yes, please check. The bug list is rather short and I just pulled out a few to highlight. I think the rest of the format can remain as it was for 4.1.5. If you need the red caveat line removed let me know, or feel free to do this. thanks for your help. I've just changed some things to keep it visually aligned with the previous version. I think there is still some content doubled in the macOS section: * For developers: * For developers: the OpenOffice SDK won't build with Java 8. Either build with --disable-odk or see the dev list archives for possible solutions. This is already some lines below. right, I've fixed this. Thanks Marcus On 11/11/2018 07:13 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: I think the next topic is writing release notes. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.6+Release+Notes Who is available for this? The release blocker 4.1.6 "+" is telling you what is in the release. There is one exception. One Bug about updates is about our update facility, and has no relevance to the Code. All the Best Peter On 11.11.18 15:58, Peter Kovacs wrote: Formating was fine in my Email client... Wired. I just copied it quickly from a calc sheet. I upload it on the release page. All the best Peter On 11.11.18 11:56, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Peter, Am 10.11.18 um 14:06 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Thanks for your efforts and participation. It is no issue if you are early or late. Important is that you believe in the release. We have following test results: *Who* *Passed* *Binding* *Windows* * * *Linunx* * * *MacOs* * * *Language Attention* *Specials* *Binary* *Source* *Binary* *Source* *Binary* *Source* khirano 1 1 Japanese Andrea 1 1 1 1 Italian Marcus 1 1 1 1 US / German Matthias 1 1 1 1 1 Included 32 bit Linux Josef 1 1 Pedro 1 1 1 1 US / Portugese Jim 1 1 1 1 1 1 Included 32 bit Linux *summary* *7* *4* *4* *1* *6* *3* *1* *1* Formatting is a bit weird... We have the necessary Binding votes. All Target systems have been tested from source and binary. We have a test coverage on diverse Languages. The Vote has been made in favor for Release. Great, then let us get this thing out! ;-) Follow the steps described here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.6 Regards, Matthias All the Best Peter On 09.11.18 01:25, Kazunari Hirano wrote: Hi Peter and all, +1 The Release Candidate 1 for 4.1.6 has passed my tests. I am sorry but I am late. I installed japanese version and en-GB langpack on my Windows 10 machine. They looks good. Thanks. khirano On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:52 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: Let's try again. Welcome to the vote on Release Candidate 1 for the 4.1.6 Release. The vote will close on Wednesday the 7.11.2018. The binaries and the source for testing are to be taken from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.6-RC1/ We follow the policy for the Apache policy on Release Approval at http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval In order to create a binding vote individuals are REQUIRED to * download all signed _source code_ packages onto their own hardware, * verify that they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, * validate all cryptographic signatures, * compile as provided, and test the result on their own platform. In order to create a normal vote individuals are REQUIRED to * download all signed _binary_ packages onto their own hardware, * verify that they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, * validate all cryptographic signatures, * compile as provided, and test the result on their own platform. The Release Candidate 1 for 4.1.6 has passed my tests. [ ] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 I have tested Windows Release [ ] source / binding [ ] binary Linux Release 32 bit [ ] source / binding [ ] binary Linux Release 64 bit [ ] source / binding [ ] binary MacOSX Relea
Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1 - Vote resolution
Hi Marcus, Am 17.11.18 um 10:09 schrieb Marcus: > Am 16.11.18 um 22:44 schrieb Kay Schenk: >> >> On 11/14/2018 01:09 PM, Marcus wrote: >>> Am 14.11.18 um 18:05 schrieb Kay Schenk: I got started a little on this yesterday. Maybe some guidance on fixed bugs that need emphasis and any dictionary updates and anything else. I have some time this week here and there. >>> >>> thanks Kay, this would be great. If you want I can check the notes >>> and integrate the final version within the download webpage on >>> Saturday. >>> >>> Marcus >> >> Hi Marcus. Yes, please check. The bug list is rather short and I just >> pulled out a few to highlight. I think the rest of the format can >> remain as it was for 4.1.5. If you need the red caveat line removed >> let me know, or feel free to do this. > > thanks for your help. I've just changed some things to keep it > visually aligned with the previous version. I think there is still some content doubled in the macOS section: * For developers: * For developers: the OpenOffice SDK won't build with Java 8. Either build with --disable-odk or see the dev list archives for possible solutions. This is already some lines below. Matthias > Marcus > > > On 11/11/2018 07:13 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > I think the next topic is writing release notes. > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.6+Release+Notes > > > > Who is available for this? The release blocker 4.1.6 "+" is > telling you > what is in the release. > > There is one exception. One Bug about updates is about our update > facility, and has no relevance to the Code. > > > All the Best > > Peter > > On 11.11.18 15:58, Peter Kovacs wrote: >> Formating was fine in my Email client... >> >> Wired. I just copied it quickly from a calc sheet. I upload it on >> the >> release page. >> >> All the best >> >> Peter >> >> On 11.11.18 11:56, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >>> Am 10.11.18 um 14:06 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Thanks for your efforts and participation. It is no issue if you are early or late. Important is that you believe in the release. We have following test results: *Who* *Passed* *Binding* *Windows* * * *Linunx* * * *MacOs* * * *Language Attention* *Specials* *Binary* *Source* *Binary* *Source* *Binary* *Source* khirano 1 1 Japanese Andrea 1 1 1 1 Italian Marcus 1 1 1 1 US / German Matthias 1 1 1 1 1 Included 32 bit Linux Josef 1 1 Pedro 1 1 1 1 US / Portugese Jim 1 1 1 1 1 1 Included 32 bit Linux *summary* *7* *4* *4* *1* *6* *3* *1* *1* >>> Formatting is a bit weird... We have the necessary Binding votes. All Target systems have been tested from source and binary. We have a test coverage on diverse Languages. The Vote has been made in favor for Release. >>> Great, then let us get this thing out! ;-) >>> >>> Follow the steps described here: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.6 >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Matthias >>> All the Best Peter On 09.11.18 01:25, Kazunari Hirano wrote: > Hi Peter and all, > > +1 > The Release Candidate 1 for 4.1.6 has passed my tests. > > I am sorry but I am late. > > I installed japanese version and en-GB langpack on my Windows > 10 machine. > > They looks good. > > Thanks. > > khirano > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:52 PM Peter Kovacs > wrote: > >> Let's try again. >> >> >> Welcome to the vote on Release Candidate 1 for the 4.1.6 >> Release. >> >> The vote will close on Wednesday the 7.11.2018. >> >> The binaries and the source for testing are to be taken from: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.6-RC1/ >> >> We follow the policy for the Apache policy on Release >> Approval at >> http://www.apache.org/legal
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: starting 4.1.7 and 4.2.0 Releases
Hi Marcus, Am 17.11.18 um 10:10 schrieb Marcus: > Am 14.11.18 um 00:09 schrieb Marcus: >> Am 13.11.18 um 08:04 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >>> Release is now in the svn branch. >>> >>> I remove tonight the 4.1.5 release, any objections? >>> >>> So how much time do we need? is release date 16th November feasable? >> >> if there is no good reason against it, I would move this always to >> the weekend, as I think the most people can spend more time for a >> release than within the week with 1-2 hours in the evening. >> >> So, Saturday (btw, which time?) would fit better - at least for me >> for the download website. > > what about the release now? Is it ready for offering on the download > webpage? As long as it concerns SourceForge, everything is uploaded in a staged directory. Maybe you want to have a look, as I did that for the first time... Regards, Matthias > > Thanks > > Marcus > > > >>> On 13.11.18 01:30, Peter Kovacs wrote: Andrea, I am just saying a 4.1.7 release has nothing to do with the efforts we have to organize for 4.2.0. I hope I upload now into the right place, but I have initiated the task. All the best Peter On 13.11.18 00:48, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Peter Kovacs wrote: >> I do not see your issue. Our release team works much faster then >> the dev >> team progresses on 4.2.0. > There is a major difference between a 4.1.x and a new release like > 4.2.0: for 4.2.0 we need the entire community, not only what you call > the "release team" and developers (read: localization efforts, > organized QA efforts, a possible public beta, a baseline update...). > If you believe that 4.2.0 is only for developers you are > underestimating the task. > >> A 4.1.7 will keep the routine and knowledge active while we develop >> 4.2.0. > We have many millions of users. We must provide some value with a > release. This meant waiting 11 months (and counting) between 4.1.5 > and > 4.1.6; if 4.1.6 has no major regressions, we can surely wait some > months before considering a 4.1.7 (again, in a non-emergency > situation). > > But I would really like that we stop talking about this virtual 4.1.7 > release and actually release 4.1.6 for real. > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Re: Check for Updates broken?
> On November 17, 2018 at 9:56 AM Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to > the OpenOffice dialog windows in Preferences - OpenOffice - General, you > can open URLs directly from within the application. I use that feature daily to edit files in a webdav folder and it does work > If you open (File - Open, then paste the URL in the filename field) > > https://ooo-updates.apache.org/aoo416/index.html > > can OpenOffice successfully retrieve the document? No. I get exactly the same error message shown in the Check for Updates dialog "Error reading data from the Internet. Server error message: ." Regards, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
Am 17.11.18 um 10:56 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Pedro Lino wrote: I don't know if this is relevant but ping to 40.79.78.1 does not work. I can only send/receive packets to/from 95.216.24.32 the same for me. Ping works only for 95.216.24.32. This would have been a good clue, but unfortunately it is exactly the same for me (and in my case updates work). Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to the OpenOffice dialog windows in Preferences - OpenOffice - General, you can open URLs directly from within the application. If you open (File - Open, then paste the URL in the filename field) https://ooo-updates.apache.org/aoo416/index.html can OpenOffice successfully retrieve the document? You should read something like "Apache OpenOffice Product Update Service for installed AOO 4.1.6 instances" if it works. The actual update XML file seems not to be recognized and it is expected to give a parsing error; but if your OpenOffice can read the index.html that sits next to it, we can confirm that OpenOffice can access the server. I get the document in the webview of Writer without any (error) message. Content: Apache OpenOffice Product Update Service for installed AOO 4.1.6 instances Folder containing update service feed for AOO 4.1.6 users performing the update check and getting the message about an available new version. contents...check.Update ... xml feed Marcus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
Pedro Lino wrote: I don't know if this is relevant but ping to 40.79.78.1 does not work. I can only send/receive packets to/from 95.216.24.32 This would have been a good clue, but unfortunately it is exactly the same for me (and in my case updates work). Another crazy test while at it: you probably know that, if you switch to the OpenOffice dialog windows in Preferences - OpenOffice - General, you can open URLs directly from within the application. If you open (File - Open, then paste the URL in the filename field) https://ooo-updates.apache.org/aoo416/index.html can OpenOffice successfully retrieve the document? You should read something like "Apache OpenOffice Product Update Service for installed AOO 4.1.6 instances" if it works. The actual update XML file seems not to be recognized and it is expected to give a parsing error; but if your OpenOffice can read the index.html that sits next to it, we can confirm that OpenOffice can access the server. Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Check for Updates broken?
Am 17.11.18 um 01:14 schrieb Dave Fisher: These IPs are the same as www.apache.org I can only think that there is something flakey on one of these two. I would suggest discussing with Infra on Hipchat. > > $ host ooo-updates.apache.org > > ooo-updates.apache.org has address 40.79.78.1 > ooo-updates.apache.org has address 95.216.24.32 What I've learned is that having more than 1 IP address for 1 domain can lead to different problems and must be avoided. So, I would expect just 1 address. But I'm not an expert for IP adresses and the DNS system. So, maybe there were improvemnts in the last 10 to 15 years that I've not seen. ;-) Marcus On Nov 16, 2018, at 3:36 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: Hi Andrea, all I don't know if this is relevant but ping to 40.79.78.1 does not work. I can only send/receive packets to/from 95.216.24.32 Regards, Pedro - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: starting 4.1.7 and 4.2.0 Releases
Am 14.11.18 um 00:09 schrieb Marcus: Am 13.11.18 um 08:04 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Release is now in the svn branch. I remove tonight the 4.1.5 release, any objections? So how much time do we need? is release date 16th November feasable? if there is no good reason against it, I would move this always to the weekend, as I think the most people can spend more time for a release than within the week with 1-2 hours in the evening. So, Saturday (btw, which time?) would fit better - at least for me for the download website. what about the release now? Is it ready for offering on the download webpage? Thanks Marcus On 13.11.18 01:30, Peter Kovacs wrote: Andrea, I am just saying a 4.1.7 release has nothing to do with the efforts we have to organize for 4.2.0. I hope I upload now into the right place, but I have initiated the task. All the best Peter On 13.11.18 00:48, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Peter Kovacs wrote: I do not see your issue. Our release team works much faster then the dev team progresses on 4.2.0. There is a major difference between a 4.1.x and a new release like 4.2.0: for 4.2.0 we need the entire community, not only what you call the "release team" and developers (read: localization efforts, organized QA efforts, a possible public beta, a baseline update...). If you believe that 4.2.0 is only for developers you are underestimating the task. A 4.1.7 will keep the routine and knowledge active while we develop 4.2.0. We have many millions of users. We must provide some value with a release. This meant waiting 11 months (and counting) between 4.1.5 and 4.1.6; if 4.1.6 has no major regressions, we can surely wait some months before considering a 4.1.7 (again, in a non-emergency situation). But I would really like that we stop talking about this virtual 4.1.7 release and actually release 4.1.6 for real. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: [vote] OpenOffice Release Candidate 4.1.6 RC1 - Vote resolution
Am 16.11.18 um 22:44 schrieb Kay Schenk: On 11/14/2018 01:09 PM, Marcus wrote: Am 14.11.18 um 18:05 schrieb Kay Schenk: I got started a little on this yesterday. Maybe some guidance on fixed bugs that need emphasis and any dictionary updates and anything else. I have some time this week here and there. thanks Kay, this would be great. If you want I can check the notes and integrate the final version within the download webpage on Saturday. Marcus Hi Marcus. Yes, please check. The bug list is rather short and I just pulled out a few to highlight. I think the rest of the format can remain as it was for 4.1.5. If you need the red caveat line removed let me know, or feel free to do this. thanks for your help. I've just changed some things to keep it visually aligned with the previous version. Marcus On 11/11/2018 07:13 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: I think the next topic is writing release notes. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.6+Release+Notes Who is available for this? The release blocker 4.1.6 "+" is telling you what is in the release. There is one exception. One Bug about updates is about our update facility, and has no relevance to the Code. All the Best Peter On 11.11.18 15:58, Peter Kovacs wrote: Formating was fine in my Email client... Wired. I just copied it quickly from a calc sheet. I upload it on the release page. All the best Peter On 11.11.18 11:56, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Peter, Am 10.11.18 um 14:06 schrieb Peter Kovacs: Thanks for your efforts and participation. It is no issue if you are early or late. Important is that you believe in the release. We have following test results: *Who* *Passed* *Binding* *Windows* * * *Linunx* * * *MacOs* * * *Language Attention* *Specials* *Binary* *Source* *Binary* *Source* *Binary* *Source* khirano 1 1 Japanese Andrea 1 1 1 1 Italian Marcus 1 1 1 1 US / German Matthias 1 1 1 1 1 Included 32 bit Linux Josef 1 1 Pedro 1 1 1 1 US / Portugese Jim 1 1 1 1 1 1 Included 32 bit Linux *summary* *7* *4* *4* *1* *6* *3* *1* *1* Formatting is a bit weird... We have the necessary Binding votes. All Target systems have been tested from source and binary. We have a test coverage on diverse Languages. The Vote has been made in favor for Release. Great, then let us get this thing out! ;-) Follow the steps described here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.1.6 Regards, Matthias All the Best Peter On 09.11.18 01:25, Kazunari Hirano wrote: Hi Peter and all, +1 The Release Candidate 1 for 4.1.6 has passed my tests. I am sorry but I am late. I installed japanese version and en-GB langpack on my Windows 10 machine. They looks good. Thanks. khirano On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 3:52 PM Peter Kovacs wrote: Let's try again. Welcome to the vote on Release Candidate 1 for the 4.1.6 Release. The vote will close on Wednesday the 7.11.2018. The binaries and the source for testing are to be taken from: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.6-RC1/ We follow the policy for the Apache policy on Release Approval at http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval In order to create a binding vote individuals are REQUIRED to * download all signed _source code_ packages onto their own hardware, * verify that they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, * validate all cryptographic signatures, * compile as provided, and test the result on their own platform. In order to create a normal vote individuals are REQUIRED to * download all signed _binary_ packages onto their own hardware, * verify that they meet all requirements of ASF policy on releases as described below, * validate all cryptographic signatures, * compile as provided, and test the result on their own platform. The Release Candidate 1 for 4.1.6 has passed my tests. [ ] yes / +1 [ ] no / -1 I have tested Windows Release [ ] source / binding [ ] binary Linux Release 32 bit [ ] source / binding [ ] binary Linux Release 64 bit [ ] source / binding [ ] binary MacOSX Release [ ] source / binding [ ] binary - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
