[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee edited a comment on pull request #32: Fix for issue #127897

[GitBox]

leginee edited a comment on pull request #32:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/32#issuecomment-758461218


   I am not sure if this is a bug or not. We should to investigate this further.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #32: Fix for issue #127897

[GitBox]

leginee commented on pull request #32:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/32#issuecomment-758461218


   I am not sure if this is a bug or not. We need to investigate this further.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[GitHub] [openoffice] leginee commented on pull request #115: Flaky tests

[GitBox]

leginee commented on pull request #115:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/115#issuecomment-758453134


   Hmm, can I add a review confirmetion somehow, I wonder.



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info RC! verification Report

[Keith N. McKenna]

On 1/3/2021 7:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> .
> That may be the problem, you have to change the bootstrap.ini, otherwise
> you use the wrong AOO profile.
>>> I will do some more tests (next year) with multi install on Windows 10.
>> Thank you Matthias. I will boot up my old windows 7 machine and try
>> testing it there as sell
> I now tested on Windows 10 with multiple AOO installations (4.1.8,
> 4.1.9, 4.2.0) and could not see a regression.
>
> @all: Maybe some other can also test? I don't feel comfortable if we are
> only two persons...
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
 Changing bootstrap.ini did the track and all problems disappeared. What
 I do not understand is why. Leaving bootstrap.ini as is should just
 point it to the standard profile
> 
> After changing bootstrap.ini all problems initially reported are gone.
> Attached is my updated QA report.
> 
> Regards
> Keith
> 
Attached is the 419 QA Verification Report

Regards
Keith



QAVerificationReport.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort

[Peter Kovacs]

On 11.01.21 20:58, Keith N. McKenna wrote:

On 1/11/2021 1:04 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:

Hi Keith,

If documentation is being moved to Gitbox/GitHub then we should use a new 
repository. OpenOffice-Docs or something else?

Regards,
Dave

Sent from my iPhone

OpenOffice-Docs sounds good to me. The only question is how we structure
it. I am very new to GitHub so that I could use some help on what would
be the most appropriate method would be.I had envisioned doing it by
software version with a Review and Published branch under each.


I like this approach.



Regards
Keith


On Jan 10, 2021, at 2:12 PM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:

Keith N. McKenna wrote:

https://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#GPL

I was a bit confused myself when I first read it, but why post it on an
ASF FAQ site if it doesn't grant reciprocity?

Because, if I recall correctly, back at the time the two Foundations worked 
together in order to achieve compatibility (which of course can only go one 
way: the GPL puts more restrictions, so it's impossible to use GPL code in 
Apache releases).

And by the way, the entire GPL discussion is useless since the wiki contents will never 
go in a release anyway, as Dave pointed out. So people touting the 
"compatibility" are misunderstanding or trolling.

Fact is, unless one has something personal against other open-source licenses, people can perfectly 
work on documentation that is not under ALv2 (or that is under ALv2 only for the new sections) on 
the wiki. Unlike other Foundations, the ASF is rather liberal, or unopinionated, about other 
licenses, provided the deliverables are never part of a release; we never included user guides with 
releases, so I think we are fine and I agree with the "narrow" interpretation of the word 
"release" as defined in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-552

Regards,
  Andrea.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




--
This is the Way! http://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: AOO 4.1.9 Info

[Arrigo Marchiori]

Hello Andrea,

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 10:09:00PM +0100, Andrea Pescetti wrote:

> On 05/01/2021 Arrigo Marchiori wrote:
> > I tried to ask if there is a procedure to follow for testing [1].
> > Do we have any? I can follow it for the Italian builds.
> 
> Things are very different depending on whether one is testing a dev build or
> a release candidate.
> 
> A list of manual tests close to the "checklist" you were looking for can be
> found here (and these apply to all builds):
> 
> https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/#AOO_3.4_General_Testing_Test_Cases
> 
> and, still on the wiki, there is also a more complete dump of the former
> Testlink cases that I cannot find right now.
> 
> A RC (Release Candidate), instead, is very different. We ship both the
> source code and convenience binaries, but the Apache release process focuses
> mostly on legal checks to be done on the source code.
> 
> Details about voting on a RC:
> http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html
> 
> An example of OpenOffice RC testing (this is what I usually do; but other
> people run different tests):
> https://s.apache.org/openoffice-416-tests

Thank you very much!
-- 
Arrigo

http://rigo.altervista.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [proposal} Trying to re-generate the Documentation effort

[Keith N. McKenna]

On 1/11/2021 1:04 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> Hi Keith,
> 
> If documentation is being moved to Gitbox/GitHub then we should use a new 
> repository. OpenOffice-Docs or something else?
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> Sent from my iPhone

OpenOffice-Docs sounds good to me. The only question is how we structure
it. I am very new to GitHub so that I could use some help on what would
be the most appropriate method would be.I had envisioned doing it by
software version with a Review and Published branch under each.

Regards
Keith

> 
>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 2:12 PM, Andrea Pescetti  wrote:
>>
>> Keith N. McKenna wrote:
> https://www.apache.org/foundation/license-faq.html#GPL
>>> I was a bit confused myself when I first read it, but why post it on an
>>> ASF FAQ site if it doesn't grant reciprocity?
>>
>> Because, if I recall correctly, back at the time the two Foundations worked 
>> together in order to achieve compatibility (which of course can only go one 
>> way: the GPL puts more restrictions, so it's impossible to use GPL code in 
>> Apache releases).
>>
>> And by the way, the entire GPL discussion is useless since the wiki contents 
>> will never go in a release anyway, as Dave pointed out. So people touting 
>> the "compatibility" are misunderstanding or trolling.
>>
>> Fact is, unless one has something personal against other open-source 
>> licenses, people can perfectly work on documentation that is not under ALv2 
>> (or that is under ALv2 only for the new sections) on the wiki. Unlike other 
>> Foundations, the ASF is rather liberal, or unopinionated, about other 
>> licenses, provided the deliverables are never part of a release; we never 
>> included user guides with releases, so I think we are fine and I agree with 
>> the "narrow" interpretation of the word "release" as defined in 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-552
>>
>> Regards,
>>  Andrea.
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm commented on pull request #32: Fix for issue #127897

[GitBox]

ardovm commented on pull request #32:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/32#issuecomment-758148778


   Please see my comment on the bug report.
   Do we still believe this is a bug?



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 RC1

[Jim Jagielski]

The macOS and Linux community builds have been re-verified and uploaded.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

[GitHub] [openoffice] ardovm opened a new pull request #118: Tentative solution of bug #125129

[GitBox]

ardovm opened a new pull request #118:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/118


   See [https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=125129]



This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 RC1

[Jim Jagielski]

It is possible that the Github commit hash #, on the About Page, may be 
incorrect.
100% cosmetic.

> On Jan 11, 2021, at 9:22 AM, Pedro Lino  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim
> 
> I downloaded and installed the Linux x64 builds on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 
> yesterday and didn't find any problems...
> What problems should have been detected?
> 
> Regards,
> Pedro
> 
>> On 01/11/2021 1:50 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> I have discovered an issue w/ the Linux and macOS builds. It is NOT
>> a problem w/ the code. As a result, I am removing these builds and 
>> will rebuild them.
>> 
>>> On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:14 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> The Apache OpenOffice PMC is happy to announce the immediate availability
>>> for testing and review of the 1st Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice
>>> 4.1.9.
>>> 
>>> Pre-built community convenience binaries can be found at:
>>> 
>>>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/binaries/
>>> 
>>> With source tarballs available at:
>>> 
>>>  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/source/
>>> 
>>> As noted, this is NOT the Official AOO 4.1.9 release, but these are
>>> the artifacts that will be proposed and voted on as AOO 4.1.9 GA
>>> upon successful testing.
>>> 
>>> NOTE: The macOS images are not App Store signed; they will be signed if/when
>>>approved as GA.
>>> 
>>> We encourage the AOO community to download and test AOO 4.1.9-RC1 and
>>> provide feedback to the project. Upon successful testing and feedback,
>>> a vote will be held to release as GA.
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 RC1

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Jim

I downloaded and installed the Linux x64 builds on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64 yesterday 
and didn't find any problems...
What problems should have been detected?

Regards,
Pedro

> On 01/11/2021 1:50 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> I have discovered an issue w/ the Linux and macOS builds. It is NOT
> a problem w/ the code. As a result, I am removing these builds and 
> will rebuild them.
> 
> > On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:14 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> > 
> > The Apache OpenOffice PMC is happy to announce the immediate availability
> > for testing and review of the 1st Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice
> > 4.1.9.
> > 
> > Pre-built community convenience binaries can be found at:
> > 
> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/binaries/
> > 
> > With source tarballs available at:
> > 
> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/source/
> > 
> > As noted, this is NOT the Official AOO 4.1.9 release, but these are
> > the artifacts that will be proposed and voted on as AOO 4.1.9 GA
> > upon successful testing.
> > 
> > NOTE: The macOS images are not App Store signed; they will be signed if/when
> > approved as GA.
> > 
> > We encourage the AOO community to download and test AOO 4.1.9-RC1 and
> > provide feedback to the project. Upon successful testing and feedback,
> > a vote will be held to release as GA.
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release of Apache OpenOffice 4.1.9 RC1

[Jim Jagielski]

I have discovered an issue w/ the Linux and macOS builds. It is NOT
a problem w/ the code. As a result, I am removing these builds and 
will rebuild them.

> On Jan 10, 2021, at 9:14 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> The Apache OpenOffice PMC is happy to announce the immediate availability
> for testing and review of the 1st Release Candidate for Apache OpenOffice
> 4.1.9.
> 
> Pre-built community convenience binaries can be found at:
> 
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/binaries/
> 
> With source tarballs available at:
> 
>   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/source/
> 
> As noted, this is NOT the Official AOO 4.1.9 release, but these are
> the artifacts that will be proposed and voted on as AOO 4.1.9 GA
> upon successful testing.
> 
> NOTE: The macOS images are not App Store signed; they will be signed if/when
> approved as GA.
> 
> We encourage the AOO community to download and test AOO 4.1.9-RC1 and
> provide feedback to the project. Upon successful testing and feedback,
> a vote will be held to release as GA.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: request of assistance

[David Robley]

Writer is the word processor; Calc is the spreadsheet.

Since you are not subscribed to this list you may not see all the 
replies to your query. To subscribe to Apache OpenOffice mailing lists 
go to http://openoffice.apache.org/mailing-lists.html


As a courtesy I have forwarded a copy of this reply to you as well as to 
the mailing list. Do Not reply to me personally but just to the list at 
 - replies to my personal email address 
will be ignored.


On 11/1/21 7:29 pm, Eliodoro Miranda wrote:

I have tried several times to register to the italian forum Open Office.
I do not succed, as at the end of he form the question: come si chiama 
editor di testo di  Open Office  (how is called the editor of Open 
Office?)

My reply is:  WRITE  or CALC

but it does not accept my reply, thus no registration
I absolutely need assistance, or i will have to convert to excel
Can someone help me?
Could you connect me with someone of the italian forum?

Thanks
Miranda



Cheers
--
David Robley

Useless Invention: Self stick frying pan.
 



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

request of assistance

[Eliodoro Miranda]

I have tried several times to register to the italian forum Open Office.
I do not succed, as at the end of he form the question: come si chiama 
editor di testo di  Open Office  (how is called the editor of Open 
Office?)

My reply is:  WRITE  or CALC

but it does not accept my reply, thus no registration
I absolutely need assistance, or i will have to convert to excel
Can someone help me?
Could you connect me with someone of the italian forum?

Thanks
Miranda

Re: test for OO on big Sur for mac

[Bidouille]

Hello Paolo,

Jim give us a pre-built for 4.1.9.
It can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.9-RC1/binaries/

Thanks for your feedback

- Mail original -
> De: "Paolo Driussi" 
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Dimanche 10 Janvier 2021 22:54:42
> Objet: test for OO on big Sur for mac
> 
> dear all
> 
> if you think I can help testing with the issues in opening .docx etc,
> I will be glad to.
> 
> I am based in Italy, and I work mainly on text documents at the
> University of Udine, teaching Hungarian and text analysis.
> 
> thanks for the great job, folks
> 
> 
> Paolo Driussi
> (L-LIN19 FIlologia ugrofinnica)
> 
> Università degli Studi di Udine
> DIUM
> Dipartimento di Studi Umanistici e del Patrimonio Culturale
> via Mazzini, 3
> I-33100 Udine (Italia)
> 
> tel. + 39 0432 556511
> 
> paolo.driu...@uniud.it
> 
> 
> private address
> Italy
> I-33100 UDINE
> via Zuglio 19/a
> +39 0432 44383
> 
> mob. (I) +39 348 2241765
> 
> paolo.driu...@citromail.hu
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org