[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum commented on pull request #151: Fix for Issue 114497

2022-06-09 Thread GitBox


cbmarcum commented on PR #151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/151#issuecomment-1151602055

   Hi Cyril, could you provide some simple steps we can use to test this before 
and after the fix for those who have not used the mail merge feature before.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum merged pull request #150: Refs #i112383#, #i117960#, and #i126272# - Basic lang backports

2022-06-09 Thread GitBox


cbmarcum merged PR #150:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



[GitHub] [openoffice] cbmarcum commented on pull request #150: Refs #i112383#, #i117960#, and #i126272# - Basic lang backports

2022-06-09 Thread GitBox


cbmarcum commented on PR #150:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150#issuecomment-1151455289

   Based on this email thread [1] on dev@ I'm going to pull this in.
   
   [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/21vgh6ovcp7mnf82j7nz6rngzx7yvztn


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Carl Marcum

On 6/9/22 11:46 AM, Carl Marcum wrote:

Hi All,

I have a PR-150 [1] that fixes a few issues with the Basic lang in 
AOO41X.

These were fixes by Damjan back in 2015 in trunk and AOO42X.

What I'm not sure is if leaving them out of 4.1.x was intentional or 
not due to not wanting to change API's or whatever.
To me these seem more like bug fixes and not API changes so I think we 
should bring them in.


The third issue was pointed out on the QA list recently by Lucien 
Mathay **so I included it as well. [2].
The example provided was the inspiration for the unit test I included 
for it.


One fix is a bug in the CLng (convert to Long) function and the other 
two fix issues with single line if statements.


For discussion:
Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x?


[1] https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hx09t5f4c4jt3x3fxn5sfkj2g0q9d56w

Best regards,
Carl



Based on the positive responses thus far I'm going to pull them in.
Best regards,
Carl


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Carl Marcum

Hi Damjan,

On 6/9/22 1:20 PM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:


For discussion:
Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x?


The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected
4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x
which was about to be EOL.


Thanks for the explanation!

I just wanted to make sure there wasn't another reason.

Best regards,
Carl



Regards
Damjan




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Keith N. McKenna

Marcus wrote:

Am 09.06.22 um 19:20 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:


For discussion:
Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x?


+1 from me.

The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I 
expected

4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x
which was about to be EOL.


Just to prevent any misunderstanding:

4.1.x is EOL when a 4.2.0 release is finally published. And even then we 
can decide to have both branches in parallel for some time.


But as we have no date for 4.2.0, 4.1.x is and will be the most current 
release branch.


Marcus
Based on Damjan's explanation of why he didn't backport them a +1 from 
me as well.


Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Marcus

Am 09.06.22 um 19:20 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic:

On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:


For discussion:
Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x?


+1 from me.


The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected
4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x
which was about to be EOL.


Just to prevent any misunderstanding:

4.1.x is EOL when a 4.2.0 release is finally published. And even then we 
can decide to have both branches in parallel for some time.


But as we have no date for 4.2.0, 4.1.x is and will be the most current 
release branch.


Marcus

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Size limits on mwiki for uploaded files are too small

2022-06-09 Thread Keith N. McKenna

Peter Kovacs wrote:

Hi all,

I set the upload size to 50MB

all the best

Peter


Thank you very much Peter, it is greatly appreciated.

Regards
Keith


Am 09.06.22 um 00:02 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:

Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi Keith,

Am 07.06.22 um 23:29 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:

Hi Matthias
Matthias Seidel wrote:

Hi Keith,

Am 07.06.22 um 05:06 schrieb Keith N. McKenna:


I found a way to reduce the size of the PDF by not using PDF-1A. 
Thank

you for looking at this.


While not using PDF-1A may reduce the size because fonts etc. are not
embedded in the PDF we lose the control over the appearance of the PDF
on the user side.


The problem with PDF/A-1A is that it does not allow transparencies and
converts them to a graphic. For the Getting Started Guide, this
results in a 3 page ToC graphic, as well as changes to many of the
graphics used. If we are going to loose control anyway, I would rather
do it and gain smaller file size right now.


You are right regarding transparency... I didn't think of that.

But then we should at least embed the used font(s).



However, this brings up the question is it time to explore other means
of creating the PDF than what we have today? Have we ever looked at
PDFBox?


Depending on your OS you could also test one of these PDF "printer". I
often use PDF24 on Windows...

Regards,

    Matthias


What I have done for the PDF is to delete the TOC from the ODT and 
create the PDF\A-1a and export  the bookmarks as active links. It is 
still a bit larger than I would like, but it does embed the fonts as 
well give the user usable TOC.


Regards
Keith



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Damjan Jovanovic
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 5:46 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:

> For discussion:
> Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x?
>

The only reason I didn't include them myself, is that back then I expected
4.2.0 to be out soon, and didn't want to waste time backporting to 4.1.x
which was about to be EOL.

Regards
Damjan


Re: Smart tags

2022-06-09 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Czesław,

Am 09.06.22 um 18:13 schrieb Czesław Wolański:
> Hi Dick, Matthias,
>
> The "OpenOffice Smarttags" topic on the English forum
> https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83377
>
> You might check an example extension provided by Hanya.

Thanks for the pointer to the example!

I still think this could be an interesting feature...

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Best regards,
> Czesław
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: [DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi Carl, all,

Am 09.06.22 um 17:46 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a PR-150 [1] that fixes a few issues with the Basic lang in
> AOO41X.
> These were fixes by Damjan back in 2015 in trunk and AOO42X.
>
> What I'm not sure is if leaving them out of 4.1.x was intentional or
> not due to not wanting to change API's or whatever.
> To me these seem more like bug fixes and not API changes so I think we
> should bring them in.
>
> The third issue was pointed out on the QA list recently by Lucien
> Mathay **so I included it as well. [2].
> The example provided was the inspiration for the unit test I included
> for it.
>
> One fix is a bug in the CLng (convert to Long) function and the other
> two fix issues with single line if statements.
>
> For discussion:
> Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x?

Personally, I also think these are bugfixes. So +1 for merging into AOO41X.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150
> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hx09t5f4c4jt3x3fxn5sfkj2g0q9d56w
>
> Best regards,
> Carl
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Smart tags

2022-06-09 Thread Czesław Wolański
Hi Dick, Matthias,

The "OpenOffice Smarttags" topic on the English forum
https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=83377

You might check an example extension provided by Hanya.

Best regards,
Czesław

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



[DISCUSS] Fixes for Basic lang in 4.1 line

2022-06-09 Thread Carl Marcum

Hi All,

I have a PR-150 [1] that fixes a few issues with the Basic lang in AOO41X.
These were fixes by Damjan back in 2015 in trunk and AOO42X.

What I'm not sure is if leaving them out of 4.1.x was intentional or not 
due to not wanting to change API's or whatever.
To me these seem more like bug fixes and not API changes so I think we 
should bring them in.


The third issue was pointed out on the QA list recently by Lucien Mathay 
**so I included it as well. [2].
The example provided was the inspiration for the unit test I included 
for it.


One fix is a bug in the CLng (convert to Long) function and the other 
two fix issues with single line if statements.


For discussion:
Should we included these fixes in 4.1.x?


[1] https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/150
[2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hx09t5f4c4jt3x3fxn5sfkj2g0q9d56w

Best regards,
Carl


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Linux VM

2022-06-09 Thread Matthias Seidel
4GB is a bit low...

But I have Windows 10 running on a 2GB machine.

Am 09.06.22 um 16:13 schrieb Bidouille:
> My computer has just 4Gb under Windows 7
> If I try to create a VM, the system crash.
>
> - Mail original -
>> De: "Matthias Seidel" 
>> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Envoyé: Jeudi 9 Juin 2022 15:58:13
>> Objet: Re: Linux VM
>>
>> My Linux VM needs 2 GB...
>>
>> Am 09.06.22 um 15:55 schrieb Bidouille:
 On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15
 minutes...
>>> Possible if your computer has enough RAM
>>> Not my case
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Linux VM

2022-06-09 Thread Bidouille
My computer has just 4Gb under Windows 7
If I try to create a VM, the system crash.

- Mail original -
> De: "Matthias Seidel" 
> À: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Envoyé: Jeudi 9 Juin 2022 15:58:13
> Objet: Re: Linux VM
> 
> My Linux VM needs 2 GB...
> 
> Am 09.06.22 um 15:55 schrieb Bidouille:
> >> On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15
> >> minutes...
> > Possible if your computer has enough RAM
> > Not my case
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> 
> 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



[GitHub] [openoffice] oooforum opened a new pull request, #151: Fix for Issue 114497

2022-06-09 Thread GitBox


oooforum opened a new pull request, #151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openoffice/pull/151

   Thanks to hanya for this patch


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Linux VM

2022-06-09 Thread Matthias Seidel
My Linux VM needs 2 GB...

Am 09.06.22 um 15:55 schrieb Bidouille:
>> On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15
>> minutes...
> Possible if your computer has enough RAM
> Not my case
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Linux VM

2022-06-09 Thread Bidouille
> On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15
> minutes...
Possible if your computer has enough RAM
Not my case


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Re: Linux VM

2022-06-09 Thread Matthias Seidel
Hi,

Someone would have to host that Linux VM somewhere...

On the other hand: A Linux VM e.g. in VirtualBox is set up in 15 minutes...

Regards,

   Matthias

Am 06.06.22 um 18:30 schrieb Bidouille:
> Hello
>
> I use MacStadium VM for testing my AOO extensions.
> Do you think is possible to have a same machine with Linux (Debian or other 
> distro)?
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature