Re: English dictionary (Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary)
Wrong answer.The end user should not have to fix anything it should work when the product is downloaded or the application should not be included in the download. It worked without difficulty prior to the latest version being released. I sent true end users to download the software , they downloaded the software and the spell check dictionary did not work. This damages our credibility as an alternative solution to pay for products that are available. What is the timeline for the download to be corrected? Alphonso Whitfield III 912-590-6266 Sales Office 912-590-6139 Ops Center i...@thevitalportal.com Vital Inc. 315 Plant Ave Suite E Waycross, Georgia 31501 - Original Message - From: Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, market...@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 4:44:54 PM Subject: English dictionary (Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary) On 27/10/2014 Alphonso Whitfield III wrote: When is the English language dictionary going to be fixed in the spell checker application? The English dictionary is not supposed to be fixed since it already works. If it doesn't work for you, try resettin your user profile. There are plenty of explanations around, see for example https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12426 Note that your comment has nothing to do with the original topic of this discussion. Please do change at least the subject (and possibly start a new discussion instead of replying to an existing one). Regards, Andrea. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary
When is the English language dictionary going to be fixed in the spell checker application? Alphonso Whitfield III 912-590-6266 Sales Office 912-590-6139 Ops Center i...@thevitalportal.com Vital Inc. 315 Plant Ave Suite E Waycross, Georgia 31501 - Original Message - From: Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com To: marketing market...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:57:48 PM Subject: Re: 2015 -- Our 30th Anniversary Malte! So, you do realize this is probably one of the very very few witness accounts we have of the origins of StarOffice? (later OpenOffice) ... and if you were to consent to writing more--or being interviewed in a podcast for more--we, or at least I, would be grateful... and better informed of that application that has so formed my adult life. best louis On 27 October 2014 14:53, Malte Timmermann malte_timmerm...@gmx.com wrote: Honestly, I don't agree on 30th Anniversary, but see 2015 as 25th Anniversary. StarWriter for text screens was written in Lueneburg near Hamburg. In Pascal. By people which later didn't work on StarWriter for Windows. In 1990, Marco started the new StarDivision location in Hamburg. StarWriter for GUI systems to be developed from scratch. Written in C++. By completely different people. When I started there in 1991, there was only a Writer prototype, as we also needed to first develop StarView, the class library for abstracting from Windows, OS/2, Mac and Unix Motif. Yes, there was a StarWriter Mac version in the beginning, long before it was canceled, and many years went by before there was one again! The concept of StarView was to create native system widgets for their corresponding components. As this approach lead to different issues, and not all systems had the same set of widgets, we later replaced StarView with VCL, as you know it today. First versions of StarOffice for Windows contained Calc and Draw developed outside from StarDivision, both using their own technology stack. Iirc, StarOffice 3.0 was the first version of the suite with all components based on StarView. The English Wiki referenced page below is misleading wrt versions. There also was a StarWriter 1.0 for Windows, many years after StarWriter 1.0 for DOS (which already was available in version 6 then). The version history is much better documented on the German Wiki page: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarOffice Just some historical data :) Best regards Malte. On 24.10.2014 17:25, Rob Weir wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Roberto Galoppini roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-10-24 16:41 GMT+02:00 Rob Weir r...@robweir.com: Those who know the history know that Apache OpenOffice is the continuation of the OpenOffice.org project, which itself came from a proprietary suite developed in Germany called StarOffice, which itself started as StarWriter, an application written in 1985 by Marco Börries . So next year, in 2015, will be our 30th anniversary. Any ideas what we might do? For example, does anyone still have a Zilog Z80 (or an emulator) that can run the original StarWriter? I'm still a proud owner of a ZX Spectrum Sinclair 48k, never heard about a StarWriter app, though. Does it exist, ideas about to get it? Cool! This is from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StarOffice#History It references a page on our wiki that claims StarWriter 1.0 was released in 1985. No idea where to get the code. Maybe Juergen or another old-timer would have a clue for us? -Rob Roberto It looks like some emulators here: http://www.z80.info/z80emu.htm#EMU_CPU_W32 It might be interesting to show the history of Writer, from release to release, via a set of screen shots (or a movie) showing the evolution of the UI. Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 80 million downloads
Good points Louis., thanks. but we still need a maven or two to crack the larger corporate environment. Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan with The Vital Portal Alphonso Whitfield i...@thevitalportal.com Vital 912-816-2595 Skype: vital.i.net Visit us at: The Vital Portal The Vital Portal On facebook Visit our Google Community Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . - Original Message - From: Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com To: market...@openoffice.apache.org, Alphonso Whitfield III awhitfi...@vital-inet.com Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 4:08:52 PM Subject: Re: 80 million downloads On 30-Nov-2013, at 15:47, Alphonso Whitfield III awhitfi...@vital-inet.com wrote: The Libre Office is getting acceptance because of its affiliation with the Ubuntu desktop and server operating platform. . It is claiming to be getting acceptance. It is being touted by a few supposedly prominent organizations, such as the South Tyrol org. But a few things. 1. We have IBM as a far more powerful and important contributor than LO has Ubuntu and Canonical. We do not trumpet that affiliation as much as we could, no doubt because we do not want to be too tightly affiliated with IBM and be seen as an appendage of IBM. I don't think we are. But I understand the concerns. 2. We need to use actual facts related to actual usage by enterprise-class users. Download numbers indicate, usually, individual users. These are important. But they do not persuade a lot of larger entities. (The Bring Your Own Device phenomenon is growing and is related to individual download numbers; but in the case of support, etc., one does, usually, need to have an enterprise buy it or enable that market; and support is often the point of decision for many.) And more on this tangent. The main point: facts and actual evidence. louis Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan with The Vital Portal Alphonso Whitfield i...@thevitalportal.com Vital 912-816-2595 Skype: vital.i.net Visit us at: The Vital Portal The Vital Portal On facebook Visit our Google Community Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . - Original Message - From: Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: market...@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 2:35:54 PM Subject: Re: 80 million downloads On 30-Nov-2013, at 14:15, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:56:19 -0500 Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote: On 30-Nov-2013, at 13:01, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:44:13 +0100 Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote: Le 27/11/2013 20:23, Rob Weir a écrit : Yesterday we reached 80,072,389 downloads. Well, I also saw this: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=49t=62425 (South Tyrol government to standardise on LibreOffice) and especially the quote from last post: We opted for LibreOffice over OpenOffice because we think this gives us more guarantees. It has a more consistent and constantly growing community of developers and by statute has to be independent from corporations, Pfeifer said. LibO is getting more and more momentum (French referential uses LibO too, something that will be implemented in more and more institutions). I wonder why AOO doesn't report similar successes. Are we lacking marketing power? Or key people? Hagar We are perhaps too polite. We don't indulge in 'slanging matches' with the LibreOffice camp, unlike many of their proponents, who may not be as connected with the main LibreOffice core group, as (for example) list members here are with the Apache setup. We should emphasise AOO's stability; unfortunately any argument for stability or almost anything is very much an 'ad hominem' argument and can be shot down by a vociferous and technically incompetent user (we hae seen many such, both on this list and on the Forum(s)) who 'knows' that a computer is a 'magic box' and expects it to accomodate his incompetence. That said, and I agree with Rory, I also think that emphasizing AOO's use by enterprises and other large-scale entities, would only help. And calling out South Tyrol's claims wouldn't be bad, either. After all, they do not seem to be based on anything like fact. louis It would be good to start by always refuting the claim that OO is dead; our (AOO) claims must always be based on facts, not on the unsupported assertions of ill-informed journalists. In the computer press one cannot (unfortunately) insist on right of reply, which one usually can get in the newspapers of record. One of the things I did during Ye Olde OOo Days, that I would rather not re-do, was use a rhetoric putting MSFT in the role of Bad
Re: 80 million downloads
The Libre Office is getting acceptance because of its affiliation with the Ubuntu desktop and server operating platform. . Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan with The Vital Portal Alphonso Whitfield i...@thevitalportal.com Vital 912-816-2595 Skype: vital.i.net Visit us at: The Vital Portal The Vital Portal On facebook Visit our Google Community Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . - Original Message - From: Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: market...@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 2:35:54 PM Subject: Re: 80 million downloads On 30-Nov-2013, at 14:15, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 13:56:19 -0500 Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote: On 30-Nov-2013, at 13:01, Rory O'Farrell ofarr...@iol.ie wrote: On Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:44:13 +0100 Hagar Delest hagar.del...@laposte.net wrote: Le 27/11/2013 20:23, Rob Weir a écrit : Yesterday we reached 80,072,389 downloads. Well, I also saw this: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=49t=62425 (South Tyrol government to standardise on LibreOffice) and especially the quote from last post: We opted for LibreOffice over OpenOffice because we think this gives us more guarantees. It has a more consistent and constantly growing community of developers and by statute has to be independent from corporations, Pfeifer said. LibO is getting more and more momentum (French referential uses LibO too, something that will be implemented in more and more institutions). I wonder why AOO doesn't report similar successes. Are we lacking marketing power? Or key people? Hagar We are perhaps too polite. We don't indulge in 'slanging matches' with the LibreOffice camp, unlike many of their proponents, who may not be as connected with the main LibreOffice core group, as (for example) list members here are with the Apache setup. We should emphasise AOO's stability; unfortunately any argument for stability or almost anything is very much an 'ad hominem' argument and can be shot down by a vociferous and technically incompetent user (we hae seen many such, both on this list and on the Forum(s)) who 'knows' that a computer is a 'magic box' and expects it to accomodate his incompetence. That said, and I agree with Rory, I also think that emphasizing AOO's use by enterprises and other large-scale entities, would only help. And calling out South Tyrol's claims wouldn't be bad, either. After all, they do not seem to be based on anything like fact. louis It would be good to start by always refuting the claim that OO is dead; our (AOO) claims must always be based on facts, not on the unsupported assertions of ill-informed journalists. In the computer press one cannot (unfortunately) insist on right of reply, which one usually can get in the newspapers of record. One of the things I did during Ye Olde OOo Days, that I would rather not re-do, was use a rhetoric putting MSFT in the role of Bad Guy—in this case, the analogue would be replacing MSFT with LO. I think we are in agreement not to do that. What I did that was more positive was create the Major Deployments page. That was then taken to levels far above my initial frame and maintained for a long while. It showed those enterprise users we knew about, and did so per region, etc. I'd think something like that would be useful, again. My interest is not to critique others, exactly, but to make it easier for journalists to get the facts. And that leads me then to: What facts do we want to emphasize? The ones I generally point to: * QA excellence * Innovations—especially those that would be of interest to enterprises. (That is: it's nifty to have other sorts of innovation but if the innovations are not actually useful or of only limited use, then the quality of the innovation is diminished. Of course, myopic journalists can still—and will still—simply point to the numbers, in the abstract.) * Ease of use and support: How hard is it is for AOO to be adopted? To drop in as a replacement for whatever is there? To integrate with mobile ambitions? What languages? — regarding each of these, a key point is expected production not just by a vague claim of community but by a more identifiable body of stakeholders—that is, companies that have staked significant business on the development and distribution and also upkeep of AOO. — and in regards to languages, as I learned with OOo, it's one thing to have a gazillion localizations but it's quite another to maintain them. The more that can be said about the groups maintaining the localizations, the better; the more information, yes, but also the more that can be revealed about their fragilities. * mobile integration: nearly everyone associated with enterprises wants a mobile version of AOO. Such
Re: 80 million downloads
I understand the message you stated is v clear but a personality associated with the product is not a bad thing, since you have declined the role maybe someone will step up into that role...intime Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan with The Vital Portal Alphonso Whitfield i...@thevitalportal.com Vital 912-816-2595 Skype: vital.i.net Visit us at: The Vital Portal The Vital Portal On facebook Visit our Google Community Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . - Original Message - From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org To: market...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Alphonso Whitfield III awhitfi...@vital-inet.com, dev@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 5:15:14 PM Subject: Re: 80 million downloads On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com wrote: On 30-Nov-2013, at 16:56, Alphonso Whitfield III awhitfi...@vital-inet.com wrote: Good points Louis., thanks. but we still need a maven or two to crack the larger corporate environment. Done that, in previous instance of my role at OOo. It's not easy and does require persistence. Then, I was also salaried by Sun/Oracle, though my hot efforts on behalf of the community as such were sometimes met with cool water. But I do not think the tactics of yore are the ones to pursue now. Keep in mind that corporate successes are not necessarily publicly-known. I can say from first-hand knowledge that we're getting a good reaction to IBM's recently-announced service offering for AOO. But these corporations are unlikely to issue a press release announcing this fact. This is different from public agencies where their choices are a matter of public record. I think that emphasizing, as I did, QA, innovation, and mobile options, as well as the robust community that is reality based, is more important. 1+ We're in a very different time than say, 2002, when open source was a new concept to many companies. The question is no longer, Should we use open source? but How should we use open source?. We already won that first war, making open source a legitimate option. What remains is a more conventional kind of technology use decision, which considers price, of course, but also features, interop, migration, training, etc., costs. In any case, the thing to keep in mind is that we are in no way diminished if someone decides to use LibreOffice. We should feel good whenever anyone uses our code, whether in the original Apache OpenOffice or whether in the winPenPack verison, the BSD port, the OS/2 port, the Solaris port or in LibreOffice fork. It is all good. -Rob Louis Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan with The Vital Portal Alphonso Whitfield i...@thevitalportal.com Vital 912-816-2595 Skype: vital.i.net Visit us at: The Vital Portal The Vital Portal On facebook Visit our Google Community Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . From: Louis Suárez-Potts lui...@gmail.com To: market...@openoffice.apache.org, Alphonso Whitfield III awhitfi...@vital-inet.com Cc: dev@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2013 4:08:52 PM Subject: Re: 80 million downloads On 30-Nov-2013, at 15:47, Alphonso Whitfield III awhitfi...@vital-inet.com wrote: The Libre Office is getting acceptance because of its affiliation with the Ubuntu desktop and server operating platform. . It is claiming to be getting acceptance. It is being touted by a few supposedly prominent organizations, such as the South Tyrol org. But a few things. 1. We have IBM as a far more powerful and important contributor than LO has Ubuntu and Canonical. We do not trumpet that affiliation as much as we could, no doubt because we do not want to be too tightly affiliated with IBM and be seen as an appendage of IBM. I don't think we are. But I understand the concerns. 2. We need to use actual facts related to actual usage by enterprise-class users. Download numbers indicate, usually, individual users. These are important. But they do not persuade a lot of larger entities. (The Bring Your Own Device phenomenon is growing and is related to individual download numbers; but in the case of support, etc., one does, usually, need to have an enterprise buy it or enable that market; and support is often the point of decision for many.) And more on this tangent. The main point: facts and actual evidence. louis Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan with The Vital Portal Alphonso Whitfield i...@thevitalportal.com Vital 912-816-2595 Skype: vital.i.net Visit us at: The Vital Portal The Vital Portal On facebook Visit our Google Community Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . - Original Message - From: Louis
Re: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection
I agree with Kadal looks like more of the same. Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan with The Vital Portal Alphonso Whitfield i...@thevitalportal.com Vital 912-816-2595 Skype: vital.i.net Visit us at: The Vital Portal The Vital Portal On facebook Visit our Google Community Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . - Original Message - From: Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.com To: dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: marketing market...@openoffice.apache.org, dev@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2013 8:46:29 AM Subject: Re: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection I like the darker font colour for Apache, but prefer all caps as it supports a more balanced layout. The descender or long leg of the Apache letter p when rendered in lowercase causes tension as it stabs the openOffice logo type. Thoughts? Kevin On May 28, 2013, at 10:10 AM, Kadal Amutham vka...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like we are retaining almost the current logo with some small changes With Warm Regards V.Kadal Amutham 919444360480 914422396480 On 28 May 2013 04:51, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote: On May 27, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: [This was cross-posted, so I'm not clear what list was intended. Makes tracking the discussion difficult.] I'll bite: I prefer Chris's latest. The weight of the lettering is more powerful. I think the Apache should not be so thin. The form used by Samer works better. I also think down-scaling will work better in this case. As far as the orb goes, Chris's could be a tad larger, but not by much. I prefer the orientation of the foreground bird to Kevin's, which has a more threatening feel in my subjective experience. These are good observations. I would like to see it with an ffi ligature. I think we should leave the 4 out. Others have mentioned that 4 is an unlucky number is some cultures. Perhaps we have compromise and have both versioned and un-versioned logo designs. If so then I think a treatment like Version 4.0 in grey and blue might work. Regards, Dave - Dennis PS: Interesting that we've come around to a close variant of the current logo. -Original Message- From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, May 27, 2013 03:22 PM To: dev@openoffice.apache.org; market...@openoffice.apache.org Subject: Next steps for AOO 4.0 Logo Selection What we've done so far: 1) Called for logo submissions from the community 2) Many designers responded and we received 40 submissions. There was a lot of cross-fertilization of ideas, as designers saw what others had come up with, what worked, and borrowed ideas. 3) We did a survey of user responses to the 40 logo submissions. Over 5000 users offered their ratings and written comments. 4) Publish report and blog post on the results of the logo survey. 5) Invited the designers of the top-rated logos to read over the survey comments and refine their designs and submit an updated version. That's where we are now. The updated logos (three of them) are on the wiki now: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Stage+2+Logo+Refinement As you can see there is quite a bit of convergence on a design occurring. So what next? I'd like to propose some next steps. A) Let's discuss the three designs on the mailing list for the next week. The discussion might lead to further refinement. B) If at the end of the week there is consensus on a single design we'll go with that one. C) If at the end of the week there is not consensus on a single design, and the discussion is not leading us closer toward consensus, then we'll have a 72-hour vote of PMC members to pick the logo. Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Results from AOO 4.0 Logo Poll
I can set up a page to compile the voting stats etc. If I had been able to participate more actively earlier I could had provided one for the larger logo voting and assessment. I can have it ready by 10 pm EDT USA if you like Rob? Please advise. You are the ringleader of this effort please provide some guidance and I can knock it out. Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan with The Vital Portal Alphonso Whitfield i...@thevitalportal.com Vital 912-816-2595 Skype: vital.i.net Visit us at: The Vital Portal The Vital Portal On facebook Visit our Google Community Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . - Original Message - From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, market...@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Samer Mansour samer...@gmail.com, Michael Acevedo vea1...@gmail.com, Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.com Sent: Friday, May 3, 2013 3:46:33 PM Subject: Re: Results from AOO 4.0 Logo Poll I've updated the report to include links to the comments received for the top scoring logos. You can find links at the end of the report: http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/ Or here: http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/34.txt http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/36.txt http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/5.txt http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/28.txt http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/12.txt http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/13.txt http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/31.txt Next steps? As far as the survey goes, I think I'm done. We have a heap of data. I tried to make some sense of it. But it now is for the designers to take all this feedback and create one or more revised designs. Of the top scoring logos, two were from Kevin Grignon, one from Samer Mansour, two from Michael Acevedo and one from someone I haven't seen on the mailing list, but whose entry on the wiki was from Chris R. Maybe it makes sense in the next round to aim for one design per designer? If so, we can probably narrow it down to 3 or 4 choices, which we can either poll users again for, or just have a vote of project participants. There isn't much time yet, so could I suggest we aim for having the revisions done for next Friday, May 10th? Aim for 400 pixels wide, PNG with white or transparent background. Regards, -Rob On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote: The survey ran for a week,and received over 5000 responses. I wrote up the results, along with some charts, and put them here: http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/ It is rather long and detailed, so I'll take a subset of that content and spin it into a blog post over the next week or two. If there is an approach to analysis that I missed, let me know. It is easy for me to create additional tables or charts. If any designer wants to receive the user comments on their logo let me know the logo number and I'll send them to you. Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: Results from AOO 4.0 Logo Poll
Thanks for the stats and analysis , I would recommend a playoff of the top five and then choose a final two from that group to come up with a definitive selection. Plan Your Work and Work Your Plan with The Vital Portal Alphonso Whitfield i...@thevitalportal.com Vital 912-816-2595 Skype: vital.i.net Visit us at: The Vital Portal The Vital Portal On facebook Visit our Google Community Join our Vital Portal Webinars at: The Vital Portal WebEx Meeting Center . - Original Message - From: Rob Weir robw...@apache.org To: dev@openoffice.apache.org, market...@openoffice.apache.org Sent: Thursday, May 2, 2013 4:29:17 PM Subject: Results from AOO 4.0 Logo Poll The survey ran for a week,and received over 5000 responses. I wrote up the results, along with some charts, and put them here: http://survey.openoffice.org/reports/aoo40-logo-poll/ It is rather long and detailed, so I'll take a subset of that content and spin it into a blog post over the next week or two. If there is an approach to analysis that I missed, let me know. It is easy for me to create additional tables or charts. If any designer wants to receive the user comments on their logo let me know the logo number and I'll send them to you. Regards, -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: marketing-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: marketing-h...@openoffice.apache.org
