Re: scons-build branch
Hello Peter, Yury, All, replying to both messages inline. On Tue, Apr 18, 2023 at 05:24:58AM +, Peter kovacs wrote: > Hello Yury > > You can build more or less every module on its own. If there is a dependency > module then you need the inc header files and the module binary to link > against. > At least this is my understanding on the build architecture. Yes, that is how it works. [...] > Am 18. April 2023 06:49:03 MESZ schrieb Yury Tarasievich: > >On 16/04/2023 16:21, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: > >> I just pushed some commits to the scons-build branch, in which I am > >> attempting to write _from scratch_ the SConscripts to build some > >> modules. > >... > >> The only module that _seems_ to build is xml2cmp, but only under Linux > >> so far. > > > >Is it because of modules dependencies, would you say, or because toolchain > >and codebase are out of sync w/r to language features used and similar > >issues? The xml2cmp does not need other modules. In practice, I took the list of modules, in the order they are built, and started with the first ones. I am working on a system (Linux openSUSE Leap 15.4) that is able to build trunk and AOO41X (with minor edits), so I can exclude toolchain-related problems. > > Last time I looked at that branch, the transition of build descriptions to > > scons hadn't been completed. This thread is about bringing the transition forward ;-) > > Can you even build AOO modules one by one, aren't they all inter-dependent? I must add to my reply above, that the current scripts isolate SCons' build artifacts, installing them all into a subdirectory named "scons". This avoids mixing Scons and GBuild output, and IMHO it is a good idea. The current structure of the ``solver'' is... complex, and I hope this migration could become and occasion to make it simpler and/or more efficient. Best regards, -- Arrigo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: scons-build branch
Hello Yury You can build more or less every module on its own. If there is a dependency module then you need the inc header files and the module binary to link against. At least this is my understanding on the build architecture. I hope I have time soon to look into build utility again. Since the topic has more challenges. All the best Peter Am 18. April 2023 06:49:03 MESZ schrieb Yury Tarasievich : >On 16/04/2023 16:21, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: >> I just pushed some commits to the scons-build branch, in which I am >> attempting to write _from scratch_ the SConscripts to build some >> modules. >... >> The only module that _seems_ to build is xml2cmp, but only under Linux >> so far. > >Is it because of modules dependencies, would you say, or because toolchain and >codebase are out of sync w/r to language features used and similar issues? > >Last time I looked at that branch, the transition of build descriptions to >scons hadn't been completed. Can you even build AOO modules one by one, aren't >they all inter-dependent? > >-Yury > >- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
Re: scons-build branch
On 16/04/2023 16:21, Arrigo Marchiori wrote: I just pushed some commits to the scons-build branch, in which I am attempting to write _from scratch_ the SConscripts to build some modules. ... The only module that _seems_ to build is xml2cmp, but only under Linux so far. Is it because of modules dependencies, would you say, or because toolchain and codebase are out of sync w/r to language features used and similar issues? Last time I looked at that branch, the transition of build descriptions to scons hadn't been completed. Can you even build AOO modules one by one, aren't they all inter-dependent? -Yury - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: scons-build branch
Hi Arrigo, Am 16.04.23 um 15:21 schrieb Arrigo Marchiori: > Dear All, > > I just pushed some commits to the scons-build branch, in which I am > attempting to write _from scratch_ the SConscripts to build some > modules. Thanks for this! > > >From a ``didactical'' point of view, I thought that this way could be > better for newbies like me, to get a grasp on SCons' internals, rather > than working on Gotoscons or other automatic converters. > > Moreover, I thought that some steps _have_ to be done, if we want to > get anywhere... ;-) Definitely... Regards, Matthias > > The only module that _seems_ to build is xml2cmp, but only under Linux > so far. > > Any comments (or also just corrections) to the commits are > appreciated. > > Best regards, smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
scons-build branch
Dear All, I just pushed some commits to the scons-build branch, in which I am attempting to write _from scratch_ the SConscripts to build some modules. >From a ``didactical'' point of view, I thought that this way could be better for newbies like me, to get a grasp on SCons' internals, rather than working on Gotoscons or other automatic converters. Moreover, I thought that some steps _have_ to be done, if we want to get anywhere... ;-) The only module that _seems_ to build is xml2cmp, but only under Linux so far. Any comments (or also just corrections) to the commits are appreciated. Best regards, -- Arrigo - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
