[dev] ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /cygdrive/c/ooo2/libwpd
Hello! I tried to compile OOo 2.1 under Windows/Cygwin, but somehow liwpd has error. Here is my log: = Building project libwpd = /cygdrive/c/ooo2/libwpd mkout -- version: 1.7 dmake: Executing shell macro: +$(WRAPCMD) echo $(subst,$/stl, $(SOLARINC)) - if ( -e ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6 ) mv ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6 ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6_removeme rm -rf ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6_removeme mkdir: cannot create directory `./wntmsci10.pro/misc/': File exists dmake: Executing shell macro: +$(TYPE) $(PRJ)$/$(ROUT)$/misc$/$(TARFILE_NAME).unpack cd ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build ( gunzip -c ../../../download/libwpd-0.8.6.tar.gz | tar -xvf -) /usr/bin/touch.exe so_unpacked_wpd libwpd-0.8.6/ [...] libwpd-0.8.6/docs/doxygen/header.html.in make writeable... cd ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build cat ../../../libwpd-0.8.6.diff | tr -d \015 | patch -b -p2 /usr/bin/touch.exe so_patched_wpd patching file libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib/makefile.mk patching file libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib/WP3VariableLengthGroup.cpp /usr/bin/touch.exe ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/so_configured_wpd mkdir ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib mkdir: cannot create directory `./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib': File exists cd ./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/libwpd-0.8.6/src/lib dmake /usr/bin/touch.exe /cygdrive/c/ooo2/libwpd/./wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/so_built_wpd dmake: Error code 5, while making '../../../../../../wntmsci10.pro/misc/s_WP3UnsupportedFixedLengthGroup.dpcc' dmake: '../../../../../../wntmsci10.pro/misc/s_WP3UnsupportedFixedLengthGroup.dpcc' removed. ---* TARGET.MK *--- dmake: Error code 255, while making './wntmsci10.pro/misc/build/so_built_wpd' ---* tg_merge.mk *--- ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /cygdrive/c/ooo2/libwpd Can you help me? KAMI - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] equivalent to insert ink comment?
Jeff Cours wrote: Howdy -- I use OO 2.1 Writer to take notes in class. I'm running it on a Windows Tablet PC. I would really like the the ability to pop out the stylus and draw a diagram into the middle of my notes. I currently have ctrl-shift-D bound to insert a frame where I can use the drawing tools to create a diagram, but the drawing tools are too cumbersome to keep up with a professor writing on the board full blast. Even the freehand drawing tool has to take time to find the endpoints and to all the nifty things that let you grab it and move it around, by which time the prof's moved on to the next thing. What I really want is something similar to Word's insert ink comment: a very fast thread that just grabs the mouse position, as long as the button's down, and throws the bits into the frame as a bitmap drawing. Ideally, it should be fast enough to capture written words, though I don't care at all if it can do OCR. It would also be wonderful if it supported the ability to erase (preferably by letting me use the eraser end of the stylus, as some of the tablet-aware software does). Does anyone know of such a feature, or an extension that might provide that feature? As you are using Windows you could insert an OLE object with MSPaint. It should be possible to create a macro that inserts such an object and by assigning it to a button or shortcut you can insert it pretty fast. Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS Please don't reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] New Master Workspace for OOo 2.2 Release opened
New Master Workspace for OOo 2.2 Release opened === OpenOffice.org release 2.2 is approaching, see http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/OOoRelease22 This brings some changes in CWS handling: *Choosing CWS Release* -- Owners of child workspaces not meant for the next release should set its 'Release' field to the next feature release. In this case its OOo 2.3. This holds true for child workspaces introducing new features. Only bug fix issues with target OOo 2.2 should be fixed in 2.2-Release CWS. *Choosing Master Workspace* --- We have opened a new code line to stabilize for OOo 2.2, called OOF680. First milestone OOF680 m1 will be available soon. When opening a new child workspace for 2.2 Release (see above) OOF680 should be choosen as master workspace. For 2.3 bound child workspaces please take SRC680 as usual. If in doubt, use SRC680. In any way release engineering will take care that all CWSs integrated for 2.2 additionally get integrated for 2.3, too. *Approving / Nominating a CWS* -- Child workspaces for the upcoming release need explicit nomination by a project lead or a member of the Release Committee. Status history than looks like new - ready for QA - approved by QA - nominated - integrated. Childworkspaces for OOo 2.3, to be integrated into SRC680 only, do not know the 'approved by QA' state. QA representatives directly set them to 'nominated', i.e. we have new - ready for QA - nominated - integrated. See http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?listName=devmsgNo=18349 A general picture of our current release model and how it relates to code lines is given in http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Release_Model (Please note that the sketch given there correctly describes the principle of opening seperate code lines for releases but has incorrect dates.) Rüdiger - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
+1 2007/1/17, Pavel Janík [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, as you probably know, several people want to do this operation on freenode.net: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org This should free #openoffice.org (the default guess) channel afterwards for generic OOo channel, mainly oriented to support our users. I'd like to call for vote here to collect some general dev attitude to this act. So: do you want to rename the channel? +1 means yes, -1 means no, +0 means What is a channel? -- Best Regards Christian Junker - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [dev] Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Hi, +1 for me : good idea Regards, Eric Bachard Le 17 janv. 07 à 22:31, Pavel Janík a écrit : I'd like to call for vote here to collect some general dev attitude to this act. So: do you want to rename the channel? +1 means yes, -1 means no, +0 means What is a channel? Please vote in this thread. The deadline (me as a benevolent dictator decided ;-) is this Friday, 23:59:59 UTC. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[dev] Re: Renaming #openoffice.org into #dev.openoffice.org?
Pavel Janík wrote: Hi, as you probably know, several people want to do this operation on freenode.net: renaming current #openoffice.org channel to #dev.openoffice.org This should free #openoffice.org (the default guess) channel afterwards for generic OOo channel, mainly oriented to support our users. I'd like to call for vote here to collect some general dev attitude to this act. So: do you want to rename the channel? +1 means yes, -1 means no, +0 means What is a channel? Please vote in this thread. The deadline (me as a benevolent dictator decided ;-) is this Friday, 23:59:59 UTC. +1. Btw, I suggest also developers to be more active on users channel. Stupid or too simple questions are rare here, most questions are quite interesting. ain - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
