Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

2007-08-14 Thread Mathias Bauer
Andreas Martens wrote:

 I see, SwDoc::GetEditShell(..) is the problem. Sometimes the Writer
 model (SwDoc) needs to broadcast an event to all controllers
 (ViewShell), e.g. if a part of the model is deleted.
 The controller could have cursor pointing into this deleted area and
 these cursors needs to be adjusted. At the moment SwDoc gets the
 controllers from the layout. If you remove the layout from the SwDoc,
 you need a new possibility to notify all ViewShells. I meant you should
 not add a parameter Layout to the method SwDoc::GetEditShell(..), we
 need a new mechanism to get the ViewShells from SwDoc _without_ using
 the layout. For the moment you should remove this parameter Layout
 from GetEditShell(..).
How did this go on? Has the Layout parameter been removed? As Andreas
said, notifying all ViewShells should be possible differently.

Best regards,
Mathias

-- 
Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
Please don't reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

2007-08-14 Thread liutao
Andreas Martens  Malte will discuss it, after the discuss Andreas  Malte will 
tell me how to solve it.
Malte told me to go on my work just to assure which files should be modified.
Best Regards,
LiuTao

 Andreas Martens wrote:
 
 I see, SwDoc::GetEditShell(..) is the problem. Sometimes the Writer
 model (SwDoc) needs to broadcast an event to all controllers
 (ViewShell), e.g. if a part of the model is deleted.
 The controller could have cursor pointing into this deleted area and
 these cursors needs to be adjusted. At the moment SwDoc gets the
 controllers from the layout. If you remove the layout from the SwDoc,
 you need a new possibility to notify all ViewShells. I meant you should
 not add a parameter Layout to the method SwDoc::GetEditShell(..), we
 need a new mechanism to get the ViewShells from SwDoc _without_ using
 the layout. For the moment you should remove this parameter Layout
 from GetEditShell(..).
 How did this go on? Has the Layout parameter been removed? As Andreas
 said, notifying all ViewShells should be possible differently.
 
 Best regards,
 Mathias
 
 -- 
 Mathias Bauer (mba) - Project Lead OpenOffice.org Writer
 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
 Please don't reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED].
 I use it for the OOo lists and only rarely read other mails sent to it.

Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

2007-07-27 Thread Andreas Martens

Hi,

liutao wrote:

Hi Malte,Andreas
  

Andreas Martens wrote:
  
That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter 
in SwDoc::DeleteSection(..)?


because the function GetEditShell() need this parameter and it is called by the 
function PaMCorrAbs() then CorrAbs() then DeleteSection()
There are also some ways to know the parameter is needed by the function 
DeleteSection.
Regards,
LiuTao
  
I see, SwDoc::GetEditShell(..) is the problem. Sometimes the Writer 
model (SwDoc) needs to broadcast an event to all controllers 
(ViewShell), e.g. if a part of the model is deleted.
The controller could have cursor pointing into this deleted area and 
these cursors needs to be adjusted. At the moment SwDoc gets the 
controllers from the layout. If you remove the layout from the SwDoc, 
you need a new possibility to notify all ViewShells. I meant you should 
not add a parameter Layout to the method SwDoc::GetEditShell(..), we 
need a new mechanism to get the ViewShells from SwDoc _without_ using 
the layout. For the moment you should remove this parameter Layout 
from GetEditShell(..).

Regards
   Andreas

liutao wrote:


Hello all,

I am absorbed in modularization of ODFToolkit project about 2 months.
But now I face a question as follows:

SwRedline::~SwRedline()
{
..
if( !GetDoc()-IsInDtor() )
   GetDoc()-DeleteSection( pCntntSect-GetNode(),rLayout );
..
}

The parameter rLayout in function DeleteSection is added by me 
and this parameter is passed from a view class(ViewShell).
  

--
Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

2007-07-25 Thread Andreas Martens

Hi Malte,

Malte Timmermann wrote:
IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply 
listeners and we don't need the parameter.
That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter in 
SwDoc::DeleteSection(..)?


But I am not sure - you are the expert ;)

So if a broadcast is used, no Layout access is needed.
But if the layouts have to be notified directly, you are right and we 
might need a list of layouts.
I do not understand this. Broadcasting will work with lists (of 
layouts), too. So there where is the difference?
Right now we don't have that, and normally we didn't want that, 
because we are just moving away the layout from the SwDoc to the 
ViewShell...

Yes, so again, why do we need this layout parameter for DeleteSection(..)?


Any comments/ideas?

No, only questions ;-)
Regards
   Andreas

Malte.

Andreas Martens wrote:

Hi LiuTao,

liutao wrote:

Hello all,

I am absorbed in modularization of ODFToolkit project about 2 months.
But now I face a question as follows:

SwRedline::~SwRedline()
{
..
if( !GetDoc()-IsInDtor() )
   GetDoc()-DeleteSection( pCntntSect-GetNode(),rLayout );
..
}

The parameter rLayout in function DeleteSection is added by me and 
this parameter is passed from a view class(ViewShell).
  
Why does DeleteSection(..) needs a dedicated layout? This function 
removes some nodes from the Writer model. If these functions needs 
access to a layout, I assume this is e.g. for notification. But then 
I think _all_ layouts need to be notified. So you don't need a 
parameter, you need the access to all layouts?!

What do you think?

That means the destructor don't know this patameter.but the 
modularization work require I to add this parameter.how to deal with 
it and make the destructor can disposal this function.

Best Regards,
LiuTao
  

Kindly regards
   Andreas
---

Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Sun Microsystems GmbH   Andreas Martens
Nagelsweg 55StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
20097 Hamburg   Phone: +49 (0)40 23646-500
Germany
http://www.sun.de   Fax: +49 (0)40 23646-550
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, 
D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten

Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

2007-07-25 Thread Malte Timmermann

Andreas...

Andreas Martens wrote:

Hi Malte,

Malte Timmermann wrote:
IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply 
listeners and we don't need the parameter.
That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter in 
SwDoc::DeleteSection(..)?


But I am not sure - you are the expert ;)

So if a broadcast is used, no Layout access is needed.
But if the layouts have to be notified directly, you are right and we 
might need a list of layouts.
I do not understand this. Broadcasting will work with lists (of 
layouts), too. So there where is the difference?

It was meant: If there is no broadcasting, then we might need the list...
So seams we don't need that.
Right now we don't have that, and normally we didn't want that, 
because we are just moving away the layout from the SwDoc to the 
ViewShell...
Yes, so again, why do we need this layout parameter for 
DeleteSection(..)?
Right now, the SwDoc has the Layout, but this will move to the 
ViewShell. Seems the Layout is used in DeleteSection for some reason, or 
in an other methods called from there.
By quickly looking in the code, I can't see why it's needed - LiuTao, 
can you clarify?


Malte.


Any comments/ideas?

No, only questions ;-)
Regards
   Andreas

Malte.

Andreas Martens wrote:

Hi LiuTao,

liutao wrote:

Hello all,

I am absorbed in modularization of ODFToolkit project about 2 months.
But now I face a question as follows:

SwRedline::~SwRedline()
{
..
if( !GetDoc()-IsInDtor() )
   GetDoc()-DeleteSection( pCntntSect-GetNode(),rLayout );
..
}

The parameter rLayout in function DeleteSection is added by me 
and this parameter is passed from a view class(ViewShell).
  
Why does DeleteSection(..) needs a dedicated layout? This function 
removes some nodes from the Writer model. If these functions needs 
access to a layout, I assume this is e.g. for notification. But then 
I think _all_ layouts need to be notified. So you don't need a 
parameter, you need the access to all layouts?!

What do you think?

That means the destructor don't know this patameter.but the 
modularization work require I to add this parameter.how to deal 
with it and make the destructor can disposal this function.

Best Regards,
LiuTao
  

Kindly regards
   Andreas
---

Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

2007-07-25 Thread Andreas Martens

Hi Malte,

Malte Timmermann wrote:

Andreas...

Andreas Martens wrote:

Hi Malte,

Malte Timmermann wrote:
IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply 
listeners and we don't need the parameter.
That's what I meant. My question was: why do we need this parameter 
in SwDoc::DeleteSection(..)?


But I am not sure - you are the expert ;)

So if a broadcast is used, no Layout access is needed.
But if the layouts have to be notified directly, you are right and 
we might need a list of layouts.
I do not understand this. Broadcasting will work with lists (of 
layouts), too. So there where is the difference?
It was meant: If there is no broadcasting, then we might need the 
list...

So seams we don't need that.

It depends.
We have already some broadcasting for parts of the layout, e.g. a 
SwTxtFrm is a listener of a SwTxtNode. When a SwTxtNode is changed, it 
notifies its listeners in the layout.
But the layout itself is not a listener, until now it was sufficient 
that the SwDoc knows the one and only layout. With your move of the 
layout from SwDoc to ViewShell I could imagine that we need more 
broadcasting.
Right now we don't have that, and normally we didn't want that, 
because we are just moving away the layout from the SwDoc to the 
ViewShell...
Yes, so again, why do we need this layout parameter for 
DeleteSection(..)?
Right now, the SwDoc has the Layout, but this will move to the 
ViewShell. Seems the Layout is used in DeleteSection for some reason, 
or in an other methods called from there.
By quickly looking in the code, I can't see why it's needed - LiuTao, 
can you clarify?
Same with me, I had looking into DeleteSection(..) and could not 
identify ATM which functions needs the layout.

Regards
   Andreas


Malte.


Any comments/ideas?

No, only questions ;-)
Regards
   Andreas

Malte.

Andreas Martens wrote:

Hi LiuTao,

liutao wrote:

Hello all,

I am absorbed in modularization of ODFToolkit project about 2 months.
But now I face a question as follows:

SwRedline::~SwRedline()
{
..
if( !GetDoc()-IsInDtor() )
   GetDoc()-DeleteSection( pCntntSect-GetNode(),rLayout );
..
}

The parameter rLayout in function DeleteSection is added by me 
and this parameter is passed from a view class(ViewShell).
  
Why does DeleteSection(..) needs a dedicated layout? This function 
removes some nodes from the Writer model. If these functions needs 
access to a layout, I assume this is e.g. for notification. But 
then I think _all_ layouts need to be notified. So you don't need a 
parameter, you need the access to all layouts?!

What do you think?

That means the destructor don't know this patameter.but the 
modularization work require I to add this parameter.how to deal 
with it and make the destructor can disposal this function.

Best Regards,
LiuTao
  

Kindly regards
   Andreas
---

Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--
Sun Microsystems GmbH   Andreas Martens
Nagelsweg 55StarOffice/OpenOffice.org
20097 Hamburg   Phone: +49 (0)40 23646-500
Germany
http://www.sun.de   Fax: +49 (0)40 23646-550
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Sun Microsystems GmbH, Sonnenallee 1, 
D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten

Amtsgericht Muenchen: HRB 161028
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Wolfgang Engels, Dr. Roland Boemer
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrates: Martin Haering

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

2007-07-24 Thread Malte Timmermann
IMHO there should be some notification, so the Layouts are simply 
listeners and we don't need the parameter.


But I am not sure - you are the expert ;)

So if a broadcast is used, no Layout access is needed.
But if the layouts have to be notified directly, you are right and we 
might need a list of layouts.
Right now we don't have that, and normally we didn't want that, because 
we are just moving away the layout from the SwDoc to the ViewShell...


Any comments/ideas?
Malte.

Andreas Martens wrote:

Hi LiuTao,

liutao wrote:

Hello all,

I am absorbed in modularization of ODFToolkit project about 2 months.
But now I face a question as follows:

SwRedline::~SwRedline()
{
..
if( !GetDoc()-IsInDtor() )
   GetDoc()-DeleteSection( pCntntSect-GetNode(),rLayout );
..
}

The parameter rLayout in function DeleteSection is added by me and 
this parameter is passed from a view class(ViewShell).
  
Why does DeleteSection(..) needs a dedicated layout? This function 
removes some nodes from the Writer model. If these functions needs 
access to a layout, I assume this is e.g. for notification. But then I 
think _all_ layouts need to be notified. So you don't need a 
parameter, you need the access to all layouts?!

What do you think?

That means the destructor don't know this patameter.but the 
modularization work require I to add this parameter.how to deal with 
it and make the destructor can disposal this function.

Best Regards,
LiuTao
  

Kindly regards
   Andreas
---

Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[dev] A question about the destructor

2007-07-23 Thread liutao
Hello all,

I am absorbed in modularization of ODFToolkit project about 2 months.
But now I face a question as follows:

SwRedline::~SwRedline()
{
..
if( !GetDoc()-IsInDtor() )
   GetDoc()-DeleteSection( pCntntSect-GetNode(),rLayout );
..
}

The parameter rLayout in function DeleteSection is added by me and this 
parameter is passed from a view class(ViewShell).
That means the destructor don't know this patameter.but the modularization work 
require I to add this parameter.how to deal with it and make the destructor can 
disposal this function.
Best Regards,
LiuTao

@Malte I eager to know the solution very much and I know you will come to our 
company in two days.so I ask the question in Mailing list.Wish you have a good 
time in BeiJing.


公司:北京红旗中文贰仟软件技术有限公司
地  址:北京经济技术开发区(亦庄)西环南路18号汇龙森A座二层 邮编:(100176)
电  话:51570010-6178
邮[EMAIL PROTECTED]
部门:开源技术部
联 系 人:刘涛

Re: [dev] A question about the destructor

2007-07-23 Thread Andreas Martens

Hi LiuTao,

liutao wrote:

Hello all,

I am absorbed in modularization of ODFToolkit project about 2 months.
But now I face a question as follows:

SwRedline::~SwRedline()
{
..
if( !GetDoc()-IsInDtor() )
   GetDoc()-DeleteSection( pCntntSect-GetNode(),rLayout );
..
}

The parameter rLayout in function DeleteSection is added by me and this 
parameter is passed from a view class(ViewShell).
  
Why does DeleteSection(..) needs a dedicated layout? This function 
removes some nodes from the Writer model. If these functions needs 
access to a layout, I assume this is e.g. for notification. But then I 
think _all_ layouts need to be notified. So you don't need a parameter, 
you need the access to all layouts?!

What do you think?


That means the destructor don't know this patameter.but the modularization work 
require I to add this parameter.how to deal with it and make the destructor can 
disposal this function.
Best Regards,
LiuTao
  

Kindly regards
   Andreas
---

Andreas Martens (ama) - OpenOffice.org Writer
OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]