Re: [dev] application/octet-stream files in SVN repository

2008-10-29 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Rich,

On Tuesday, 2008-10-28 10:58:07 +0200, Rich wrote:

 just rambling here... wouldn't 'svn:eol-type native' make the most sense ?

Usually not, it gives headaches with diffs created on, for example,
a CrLf system that may not apply as patch on a Lf-only system, or vice
versa, or if they do may result in mixed files, which would be even
worse. Reasonably modern tools and editors are able to work with Lf-only
files, so there is no need for native EOLs.

  Eike

-- 
 OOo/SO Calc core developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
 SunSign   0x87F8D412 : 2F58 5236 DB02 F335 8304  7D6C 65C9 F9B5 87F8 D412
 OpenOffice.org Engineering at Sun: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS
 Please don't send personal mail to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, which I use 
for
 mailing lists only and don't read from outside Sun. Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Thanks.


pgp1ES4kRVipn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [dev] application/octet-stream files in SVN repository

2008-10-28 Thread Stephan Bergmann

On 10/27/08 20:03, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:

Either these files were flagged as binary files in CVS or the Subversion
  import file type detection heuristic didn't work, so SVN choosed the
save way (import the file as binary). The mime type can be changed, text
would be best for the patches and in addition the svn:eolstyle should be
set to CRLF.


http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95525

-Stephan


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] application/octet-stream files in SVN repository

2008-10-28 Thread Rich

On 2008.10.27. 21:03, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:

Stephan Bergmann wrote:

svn propget svn:mime-type --depth files
svn://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/trunk/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

shows that all of

STLport-4.0.patch
STLport-4.5-0119.patch
STLport-4.5.patch
dos_lineends.patch
win32_custom.sh
win32_sdk.sh

are classified as application/octet-stream (and so, e.g., svn diff on
them will not report anything useful).  All of them consistently use LF
line ends, except for dos_lineends.path, which consistently uses CRLF
line ends.  Why are all those files, erroneously in my opinion,
classified as application/octet-stream?


Either these files were flagged as binary files in CVS or the Subversion
  import file type detection heuristic didn't work, so SVN choosed the
save way (import the file as binary). The mime type can be changed, text
would be best for the patches and in addition the svn:eolstyle should be
set to CRLF.


just rambling here... wouldn't 'svn:eol-type native' make the most sense ?


Heiner

--
 Rich

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[dev] application/octet-stream files in SVN repository

2008-10-27 Thread Stephan Bergmann
svn propget svn:mime-type --depth files 
svn://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/trunk/[EMAIL PROTECTED]


shows that all of

STLport-4.0.patch
STLport-4.5-0119.patch
STLport-4.5.patch
dos_lineends.patch
win32_custom.sh
win32_sdk.sh

are classified as application/octet-stream (and so, e.g., svn diff on 
them will not report anything useful).  All of them consistently use LF 
line ends, except for dos_lineends.path, which consistently uses CRLF 
line ends.  Why are all those files, erroneously in my opinion, 
classified as application/octet-stream?


-Stephan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [dev] application/octet-stream files in SVN repository

2008-10-27 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
 svn propget svn:mime-type --depth files
 svn://svn.services.openoffice.org/ooo/trunk/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 shows that all of
 
 STLport-4.0.patch
 STLport-4.5-0119.patch
 STLport-4.5.patch
 dos_lineends.patch
 win32_custom.sh
 win32_sdk.sh
 
 are classified as application/octet-stream (and so, e.g., svn diff on
 them will not report anything useful).  All of them consistently use LF
 line ends, except for dos_lineends.path, which consistently uses CRLF
 line ends.  Why are all those files, erroneously in my opinion,
 classified as application/octet-stream?

Either these files were flagged as binary files in CVS or the Subversion
  import file type detection heuristic didn't work, so SVN choosed the
save way (import the file as binary). The mime type can be changed, text
would be best for the patches and in addition the svn:eolstyle should be
set to CRLF.

Heiner


-- 
Jens-Heiner Rechtien
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]