Re: [OSM-dev] Little doubt about planet updates
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:30:13AM -0800, Juan Lucas Domínguez Rubio wrote: Hello, I have downloaded this file: http://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet-110119.osm.bz2 contains the changes performed during the [date] day (UTC time), therefore the first file I should use in my case would be: http://planet.openstreetmap.org/daily/20110119-20110120.osc.gz Not worth the hassle, try the minutely mapnik. Easier to do and can keep the database uptodate in minutely intervals :) - http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Minutely_Mapnik What happens then with changes done between 19.01.2011 00.00 and 19.01.2011 01.00? They will be applied but they were already there. So I presume applying changes a second time is not a problem? No, it's not a problem. greetings, Stephan -- Seid unbequem, seid Sand, nicht Öl im Getriebe der Welt! - Günther Eich ,-. | Stephan Plepelits, | | Technische Universität Wien -Studien Informatik Raumplanung | | Projects: | | openstreetbrowser.org couchsurfing.org tubasis.at bl.mud.at | | Contacts: | | Mail: sk...@xover.mud.at Jabber: sk...@jabber.at| | Blog: plepe.at Twitter: twitter.com/plepe | `-' ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Error While Installing osm2pgsql
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: There may be breakage on Debian as well but I've only witnessed on Ubuntu. Version 25081 does compile just fine in Debian lenny (hopefully oldstable after next weekend) and squeeze (hopefully stable after next weekend). So this looks like a Ubuntu only bug. Sven -- Microsoft ist offenbar die einzige Firma, die in der Lage ist, ein mit Office nicht kompatibles Bürosoftwarepaket einzuführen. (Florian Weimer in de.alt.sysadmin.recovery) /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] .pbf files
I have been experimenting with the binary format .pbf files. Does anyone who creates .pbf files use the Node message or just the DenseNodes message? -- Cheers, Chris user: chillly ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Potlatch2 - ways all unrecognised?
Doesn't work for me. But I note that the deployed version is rev25177 while the latest is rev25202. On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote: It is fixed now, in v25177. Thanks! Colin On 29/01/2011 12:21, Richard Fairhurst wrote: Colin Smale wrote: I have been using Potlatch2 for several weeks now without serious hassles. Since yesterday however it can't recognise a way. We think there's a bug and are looking into it. cheers Richard ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Potlatch2 - ways all unrecognised?
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: Doesn't work for me. But I note that the deployed version is rev25177 while the latest is rev25202. If you're still having problems then try flushing your cache. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch2-ways-all-unrecognised-tp5972359p5977767.html Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Potlatch2 - ways all unrecognised?
I cleared my cache (Flash and browser) on both Firefox and Chrome but the problem persists. Actually, I'm not sure if the problem I'm having is the same as others. Basically, no OSM data is displayed (or visible). When I drop POI icons to the map, they shrink and disappear. The same thing happens to way segments as they are drawn. On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Eugene Alvin Villar wrote: Doesn't work for me. But I note that the deployed version is rev25177 while the latest is rev25202. If you're still having problems then try flushing your cache. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch2-ways-all-unrecognised-tp5972359p5977767.html Sent from the Developer Discussion mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] .pbf files
Osmosis uses densenode by default, but can optionally use node messages. I know of no other implementations of a pbf file writer. On Jan 31, 2011 8:49 AM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote: I have been experimenting with the binary format .pbf files. Does anyone who creates .pbf files use the Node message or just the DenseNodes message? -- Cheers, Chris user: chillly ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
