Re: [Potlatch-dev] [OSM-newbies] Can't see my gps traces in the map or Potlatch2
On 11/12/2012 21:36, SomeoneElse wrote: Sebastian Arcus wrote: I have uploaded a bunch of gps traces as identifiable. They show up under See your traces. However, when I click on map or edit I can't see them on the map or in Potlatch2 editor. Am I doing something wrong, or is there a temporary problem with the system? Looking at the GPX file, I can't see anything unusual. I've cc:ed the potlatch-dev list in case anyone there has any idea why it may be not showing via Edit. The XML namespace attribute in the GPX file appears to be... not what Potlatch 2 is expecting. Potlatch 2 expects http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1/1 and the GPX file has http://www.topografix.com/GPX/1.1 Strictly speaking I think this is an error in the NavSys GPS logger software you appear to be using. It might be possible to make P2 a bit more tolerant, though. cheers Richard ___ Potlatch-dev mailing list Potlatch-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/potlatch-dev
Re: [osmosis-dev] Invalid ways, now with code
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hi Toby,
Anyway, thoughts? My changes are on github in the invalid_geometry branch:
https://github.com/ToeBee/osmosis
And a diff of all my changes:
https://github.com/ToeBee/osmosis/compare/master...invalid_geometry
What about other situations where a way is invalid? For example, this
results in 'f':
SELECT ST_IsValid('LINESTRING(1 1, 1 1, 1 1, 1 1, 1 1)'::geometry)
This was touched on in the previous thread a little. The problem is
that there is no direct interaction with the database at this level.
When doing an import, no connection to the database even exists.
Everything goes to a dump file and is then loaded in via a COPY
command. So I can't just call ST_IsValid. Furthermore, I don't see a
way of checking for geometry validity in java. I could maybe do a few
basic checks based on node order and location but I suspect that if I
start touching nodes at all, there is going to be a huge performance
hit on a planet import.
Also, out of the 3,455 ways with invalid geometries currently in my
database, 3,157 of them are single node ways. So just this simple node
count check eliminates over 90% of invalid geometries. Given the
challenges and costs of doing more exhaustive checking, this seems
like a decent compromise.
My personal goal here is actually to have a database *with* these
invalid ways in it which is currently not possible. Because objections
were raised about how these ways can affect some spatial queries, I am
trying to reduce the impact of them on people who do care about such
things. The new option on the replication task is a big step forward
in this case. I don't think it is currently possible to keep *all*
invalid ways out of the database during an import. If this is really a
requirement, it will need to be done with a query after the database
has been populated.
Toby
___
osmosis-dev mailing list
osmosis-dev@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/osmosis-dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Announcing openstreetmap-carto v1.0 (and v2.0!)
On 10/12/12 19:57, Dane Springmeyer wrote: On Dec 6, 2012, at 7:54 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: There is already a plan to do a major update on the tile server with an update of the OS, a reload of the database and a mapnik update and my suggestion was that we should aim to switch to the Carto generated style at the same time. We just need to work out the detailed plan and schedule the work. Let me know how I can help here. On the Mapnik side, we've got a 2.1.x branch (which is a stable series) coming together nicely (current Mapnik master is targeting 2.2). A 2.1.1 release is planned within the next month - the only real work remaining is carefully choosing which additional bugfixes to back-port from Mapnik master. Well one thing that would be really nice (to follow up on Andy's enquiry on the mapnik list just now) would be to have a version with the harfbuzz work merged, which should allow us to close a load of tickets I think... Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] osm2pgsql Windows build
Would anyone be interested in a current osm2pgsql Windows build (Win32 + x64, both with 32 bit id space)? In the near future I will link the zipped binary package on the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql I recently needed a Windows version of the program and had to compile it. Needless to say, it took me a rather large part of an evening to accomplish. ;-) Version: b31c660 (git, Oct 28, 2012) Built using: - geos 3.3.5 - libxml 2.9.0 - pgsql 9.2.1 - proj 4.8.0 - proto_buf 0.1.5 - zlib 1.2.7 NOT included: - gazetteer - shell prompt - null output - libgen - pthread (obviously fork() doesn't work on windows and I didn't want to get into making the code thread-safe) In order to compile the C99 code, I used the Intel Compiler. I successfully compiled Win32 and x64 versions and imported current osm planet pbf's. Mapnik rendering (current version) appears to work fine with the created databases. The rather extensive changes and inclusion of dependencies into a solution prevent me from committing the resulting source. If there is serious interest, I can cobble together a brief description of what I did and share my VS2010 solution. Is anyone against switching to C++ (see osm2pgsql TODO)? In my opinion it would result in cleaner code and make building on windows a lot easier. Also, fork() could be replaced with omp if the effects are sorted out carefully. Dominik Perpeet ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
[OSM-dev] Carto-based Mapnik OSM Rendering
Hi all, With some help from the MapBox folks I set up a layer on the OSM US server that renders from a recent version of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet [0] converted to Mapnik XML: http://tile.osm.osuosl.org/tiles/osm_carto/preview.html#15/41.8813/-87.6299 You can compare this with a (semi-old) version that comes from the existing Mapnik XML-based stylesheet the Carto one is based on: http://tile.osm.osuosl.org/tiles/osmus/preview.html#15/41.8813/-87.6299 This server isn't the fastest thing in the world so please don't hammer it to death. Feel free to use it to help improve the carto-based stylesheet though! I'm happy to update the stylesheet at any time. -Ian [0] https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Carto-based Mapnik OSM Rendering
Hey, To make it a bit easier to compare, here's the two on a split screen: http://bl.ocks.org/d/4271706/ From a cursory scan, there are some labelling and font changes (mostly for the better, in my opinion) and a possible bug around the coloring of the botanical garden. Tom On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, With some help from the MapBox folks I set up a layer on the OSM US server that renders from a recent version of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet [0] converted to Mapnik XML: http://tile.osm.osuosl.org/tiles/osm_carto/preview.html#15/41.8813/-87.6299 You can compare this with a (semi-old) version that comes from the existing Mapnik XML-based stylesheet the Carto one is based on: http://tile.osm.osuosl.org/tiles/osmus/preview.html#15/41.8813/-87.6299 This server isn't the fastest thing in the world so please don't hammer it to death. Feel free to use it to help improve the carto-based stylesheet though! I'm happy to update the stylesheet at any time. -Ian [0] https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] Carto-based Mapnik OSM Rendering
Again, this is awesome to have this up. If you find issues, please file here https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues Or fork, fix and issue a pull request :-) And really, on a first glance there is very little difference. Just filed one for leisure=garden https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/6 On Dec 12, 2012, at 4:15 PM, Tom MacWright t...@macwright.org wrote: Hey, To make it a bit easier to compare, here's the two on a split screen: http://bl.ocks.org/d/4271706/ From a cursory scan, there are some labelling and font changes (mostly for the better, in my opinion) and a possible bug around the coloring of the botanical garden. Tom On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:03 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, With some help from the MapBox folks I set up a layer on the OSM US server that renders from a recent version of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet [0] converted to Mapnik XML: http://tile.osm.osuosl.org/tiles/osm_carto/preview.html#15/41.8813/-87.6299 You can compare this with a (semi-old) version that comes from the existing Mapnik XML-based stylesheet the Carto one is based on: http://tile.osm.osuosl.org/tiles/osmus/preview.html#15/41.8813/-87.6299 This server isn't the fastest thing in the world so please don't hammer it to death. Feel free to use it to help improve the carto-based stylesheet though! I'm happy to update the stylesheet at any time. -Ian [0] https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev Alex Barth http://twitter.com/lxbarth tel (+1) 202 250 3633 ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql Windows build
Dominik, Great work - thanks for sharing. Jhuntley (on #osm irc and https://github.com/onepremise) has also been working on getting a build going recently. You two might want to share notes. He's tried both the cygwin and mingw routes. I made a failed attempt at msvc 2010 a while back. Never thought about the intel compiler for C99 on windows. Clever. Capturing your notes + adding a link to your project files would be great. Also, we should coordinate getting relevant patches in for easy stuff. +1 to more C++ to work around C99 issues. In the end I think the most critical thing is documentation of a process that works, no matter how messy. Dane On Dec 12, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Dominik Perpeet wrote: Would anyone be interested in a current osm2pgsql Windows build (Win32 + x64, both with 32 bit id space)? In the near future I will link the zipped binary package on the wiki: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osm2pgsql I recently needed a Windows version of the program and had to compile it. Needless to say, it took me a rather large part of an evening to accomplish. ;-) Version: b31c660 (git, Oct 28, 2012) Built using: - geos 3.3.5 - libxml 2.9.0 - pgsql 9.2.1 - proj 4.8.0 - proto_buf 0.1.5 - zlib 1.2.7 NOT included: - gazetteer - shell prompt - null output - libgen - pthread (obviously fork() doesn't work on windows and I didn't want to get into making the code thread-safe) In order to compile the C99 code, I used the Intel Compiler. I successfully compiled Win32 and x64 versions and imported current osm planet pbf's. Mapnik rendering (current version) appears to work fine with the created databases. The rather extensive changes and inclusion of dependencies into a solution prevent me from committing the resulting source. If there is serious interest, I can cobble together a brief description of what I did and share my VS2010 solution. Is anyone against switching to C++ (see osm2pgsql TODO)? In my opinion it would result in cleaner code and make building on windows a lot easier. Also, fork() could be replaced with omp if the effects are sorted out carefully. Dominik Perpeet ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [OSM-dev] osm2pgsql Windows build
Thanks for your feedback. I'll see to getting the documentation up soon. Do you know whether Jhuntley got a 64 bit build running? A 32 bit build wasn't feasible for me, since the machines I run osm2pgsql on have plenty of RAM. Once I post my project files, someone else can check if they want to merge the stuff with trunk (I put all my changes inside #ifdef WIN32 wrappers). Instead of doing that, I'd rather migrate the code to C++ with inheritance of an abstract base class instead of function pointer structs. With those removed, omp instead of fork, and some other minor changes, the code should compile cleanly with msvc as well. Dominik 2012/12/13 Dane Springmeyer d...@dbsgeo.com Dominik, Great work - thanks for sharing. Jhuntley (on #osm irc and https://github.com/onepremise) has also been working on getting a build going recently. You two might want to share notes. He's tried both the cygwin and mingw routes. I made a failed attempt at msvc 2010 a while back. Never thought about the intel compiler for C99 on windows. Clever. Capturing your notes + adding a link to your project files would be great. Also, we should coordinate getting relevant patches in for easy stuff. +1 to more C++ to work around C99 issues. In the end I think the most critical thing is documentation of a process that works, no matter how messy. Dane ___ dev mailing list dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/dev
