Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebbeans 2.0.21

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Em dom., 3 de jan. de 2021 às 16:57, Romain Manni-Bucau <
rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi all,
>
> Here is the vote for our OWB 2.0.21.
>
> Overall we have two main changes:
>
> 1. fix OwbRequestContextController web integration
> 2. add some startup improvements and enable to use graalvm to convert a cdi
> se OWB application to a native one
>
> Here is the changelog:
>
> PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatus
> [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1355
> 
> OwbRequestContextController
> does not work with web contexts service
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1356
>  Use lazy logger lookup
> for
> error only usages  Romain
> Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1357
>  Enable to skip some
> Extension resolution when there is no observer
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1358
>  [CDI-SE] enable to
> configure custom services through properties
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Improvement] OWB-1359
>  Simplify extension
> manipulation by making DefaultLoaderService more easily extensible
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1360
> 
> ProcessSyntheticObserverMethod
> not considered as a container event
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1361
>  Some startup time
> improvements  Romain
> Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1362
>  using static proxy names
> can lead to a NPE with xxhash64 algorithm
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1363
>  Add a
> PreScannedCDISeScannerService service for cdi se module
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
> [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1364
>  Proxy unique hash
> computation should ignore Object methods (always in the same bucket)
>  Romain Manni-Bucau
> <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> >
> RESOLVED
>
> Tag:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans.git;a=commit;h=cb11ec2cb48443220ef8b04c633073b7f7c88916
> Staging:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1068/
> Dist: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
> My key is the same than last time.
>
> Please vote:
>
> [ ] +1 release it
> [ ] -1 don't ${cause}
>
> Vote will be open for 3 full days or until we get enough bindings.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau  |  Blog
>  | Old Blog
>  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn  | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Meecrowave 1.2.10

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Em qui., 12 de nov. de 2020 às 11:23, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> +1
>
> Am Do., 12. Nov. 2020 um 15:02 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
>
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 12.11.2020 um 13:39 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre :
> > >
> > > +1 (non binding)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > >> Le 12 nov. 2020 à 12:06, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
> > écrit :
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> Here is the vote for Meecrowave 1.2.10.
> > >> Here is the changelog:
> > >>
> > >> 1–53 of 53View in Issue Navigator
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%2012320731%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012346027%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
> > >
> > >> PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatus
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Improvement] MEECROWAVE-218
> > >>  Upgrade Tomcat
> > to
> > >> 9.0.39  Romain
> > >> Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Task] MEECROWAVE-220
> > >>  CXF 3.3.4
> > upgrade
> > >>  Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Task] MEECROWAVE-221
> > >>  Tomcat 9.0.29
> > upgrade
> > >>  Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Task] MEECROWAVE-222
> > >>  Upgrade to
> > >> OpenWebBeans 2.0.13
> > >>  Romain
> > >> Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Task] MEECROWAVE-223
> > >>  Upgrade to
> > Johnzon
> > >> 1.2.2  Romain
> > >> Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Bug] MEECROWAVE-224
> > >>  Arquillian
> > >> configuration not honored
> > >>  Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Improvement] MEECROWAVE-225
> > >>  Remove
> > johnzon-jaxrs
> > >> and fully rely on johnzon-jsonb
> > >>  Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Improvement] MEECROWAVE-226
> > >>  Upgrade to
> > Tomcat
> > >> 9.0.30  Romain
> > >> Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Improvement] MEECROWAVE-227
> > >>  Upgrade to
> > XBean 4.15
> > >>  Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Bug] MEECROWAVE-228
> > >>  Proxy fails
> when
> > >> cookies don't set the domain
> > >>  Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Improvement] MEECROWAVE-229
> > >>  Upgrade to CXF
> > 3.3.5
> > >>  Romain
> > Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> RESOLVED
> > >> [image: Major] [image: Improvement] MEECROWAVE-230
> > >>  Upgrade to
> > >> OpenWebBeans 2.0.14
> > >>  Romain
> > >> Manni-Bucau
> > >> <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > >> 

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebbeans 2.0.20

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Em qui., 12 de nov. de 2020 às 11:22, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> +1
>
> Am Do., 12. Nov. 2020 um 15:02 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
> :
>
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 12.11.2020 um 11:04 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > Due to the missing interceptor and bug in interceptor resolution on
> > > lifecycle here is the 2.0.20 release (of the year 2020 ;)).
> > > Here is the full changelog:
> > >
> > > 1–7 of 7View in Issue Navigator
> > > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20=%2012310844%20AND%20fixVersion%20=%2012349285%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC,%20key%20ASC
> > >
> > > PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatus
> > > [image: Major] [image: Improvement] OWB-1074
> > >  implement automatic
> > > supportsConversation() detection
> > >  Unassigned OPEN
> > > [image: Major] [image: New Feature] OWB-1078
> > >  create Dockerfiles
> for
> > > installing OpenWebBeans as Docker Image based on Tomcat8
> > >  Mark Struberg
> > > 
> > OPEN
> > > [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1088
> > >  fix samples with
> java 8
> > > and update to tomcat7/8
> > >  Reinhard
> > > Sandtner
> > >  >
> > OPEN
> > > [image: Major] [image: Improvement] OWB-1282
> > >  Reduce reflection
> usage
> > > for default services in WebBeansContext
> > >  Mark Struberg
> > > 
> > > REOPENED
> > > [image: Major] [image: Task] OWB-1352
> > >  Add
> > > org.apache.webbeans.corespi.se.SimpleApplicationBoundaryService
> > > implementation to enable to use the startup classloader
> > >  Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > > RESOLVED
> > > [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1353
> > > 
> @ActivateRequestContext
> > > not supported  Romain
> > > Manni-Bucau
> > > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > > RESOLVED
> > > [image: Major] [image: Bug] OWB-1354
> > >  Lifecycle
> interceptors
> > > inherit from method interceptors
> > >  Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau
> > >
> > > RESOLVED
> > > 1–7 of 7
> > >
> > >
> > > Tag:
> > >
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans.git;a=tag;h=258821e32ba9b3466b8c75bc2d1fbb9049c89032
> > > Staging:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1066/
> > > Dist: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
> > > My key is the same as last time.
> > >
> > > Please vote:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 release it
> > > [ ] -1 don't ${cause}
> > >
> > > Vote will be open for 3 full days or until we get enough bindings.
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> > >  | Old Blog
> > >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn  | Book
> > > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.18

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Em ter., 8 de set. de 2020 às 02:40, Daniel Dias Dos Santos <
daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi,
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2020, 11:22 Mark Struberg 
> wrote:
>
> > hi!
> >
> > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.17
> >
> > The following tickets have been resolved:
> > Sub-task
> > [OWB-1346] - prevent scanning of generated proxies
> >
> > Bug
> > [OWB-1281] - java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError in scanner stops
> > application deployment
> > [OWB-1328] - NPE in AbstractMetaDataFactory
> > [OWB-1332] - BeansDeployer#packageVetoCache does not work for
> negative
> > hits
> > [OWB-1333] - [junit5] @Cdi#onStart not working
> > [OWB-1341] - Event bus: IN_PROGRESS phase should not be sent to
> > transactionService
> > [OWB-1342] - Improve startup performance
> > [OWB-1344] - Ensure creating annotatedtype is thread safe at runtime
> >
> > Task
> > [OWB-1327] - Run TCK for jakarta packaging
> > [OWB-1329] - Remove openwebbeans-maven module
> > [OWB-1330] - Junit5 parameter resolver companion for @Cdi
> > [OWB-1331] - Create ajunit5 @Scopes extension to be able to control a
> > bit more the started scopes
> > [OWB-1343] - Add a property to skip @Vetoed check on packages
> > [OWB-1345] - Upgrade gradle shadow plugin support to v6.0.0
> > [OWB-1347] - upgrade to apache-parent 23
> >
> > The staging repo is
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1063/
> >
> > commit in our repo is 2a97bc8250c4ed0d7cf36399c495c8898dbec216
> >
> >
> > The source release can be found in
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1063/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.18/
> > sha1
> > <
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1063/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.18/sha1
> >
> > is 05532a06561f560100def9e26d4df066f3db0e40
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> > [+1] let's ship it
> > [0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.15

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Em sex., 14 de fev. de 2020 às 06:38, Jean-Baptiste Onofre 
escreveu:

> +1 (non binding)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> > Le 14 févr. 2020 à 09:49, Romain Manni-Bucau  a
> écrit :
> >
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > As mentionned on the list, here is the release of our beloved (in this
> day
> > ;)) OWB 2.0.15.
> > It fixes the RequestContextController impl which is now thread safe.
> >
> > Here are the voting repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1060/
> > Tag:
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=openwebbeans.git;a=tag;h=f45d52446d1db36544faf29cee44bf4fee399f11
> > Dist area: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
> > My key is the same than last time.
> >
> > Please vote:
> >
> > [ ] +1 it rocks
> > [ ] -1 because ${x}
> >
> > Vote is open for 72h as usual or until it gets cancelled or 3 +1
> bindings.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Blog
> >  | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Book
> > <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>

-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: [VOTE] release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.14

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Em seg., 13 de jan. de 2020 às 07:38, Reinhard Sandtner <
reinhard.sandt...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> +1
>
> lg
> reini
>
> > Am 11.01.2020 um 16:27 schrieb Mark Struberg  >:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I've run all the tasks to release OWB 2.0.14
> >
> > Here is the list of fixed bugs:
> >
> > Bug
> >
> >   • [OWB-1280] - NPE in filterExcludedJars
> >   • [OWB-1303] - AbstractOwbBean does not conserve the actual user
> code exception when creating a bean fails
> >   • [OWB-1305] - Extensions can be looked up during their bean
> creation leading to a NPE
> >   • [OWB-1309] - upgrade to new tomcat7.0.99 introduces a Problem
> with a new NoSuchMethodException
> > Improvement
> >
> >   • [OWB-1306] - Be more tolerant to java version in our
> unsafe/proxy usage/registration
> > Task
> >
> >   • [OWB-1304] - Change OWB to build fine with Java11
> >   • [OWB-1307] - remove conversation.periodicDelay option from our
> config
> >   • [OWB-1308] - dependency upgrades
> >
> >
> > The staging repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1059
> >
> > The source zip can be found here
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1059/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.14/
> > sha1 is c0b4fecab7eb17209ff72aa6df4d4ff898433df1
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] go ship it
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop, there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: Meecrowave Proxy

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Romain,

Should it[1] be: *request = request.header(name, req.getHeader(name));*
instead of *request = request.header(name, list(req.getHeaders(name))); ?*
I see which it just copy headers if I have the skippedHeaders declared, so
if I want to copy the headers without skip, I need to declare it with a
empty list like: "skippedHeaders": []. same behavior for cookies.


[1]
https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/blob/master/meecrowave-proxy/src/main/java/org/apache/meecrowave/proxy/servlet/front/ProxyServlet.java#L127

Em sex., 20 de dez. de 2019 às 14:15, Daniel Cunha 
escreveu:

> Hi Romain,
>
> Ok, good catch! But my issue here was releated with the SQUID/ProxyHTTP of
> the company.
> They needed to allow the URL which I was trying calling. :P
>
> Anyway, thank you man! :)
>
> Em sex., 20 de dez. de 2019 às 13:46, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> It is a NPE in cookies without domain, will be fixed for next release
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> >
>>
>>
>> Le ven. 20 déc. 2019 à 17:20, Daniel Cunha  a
>> écrit :
>>
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I'm trying configure a proxy with meecrowave, I can see the test working
>> > fine:
>> >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/blob/master/meecrowave-proxy/src/test/java/org/apache/meecrowave/proxy/servlet/ProxyServletTest.java
>> >
>> > I'm try creating a route like:
>> >
>> > {
>> >   "id": "example-route",
>> >   "requestConfiguration": {
>> > "method": "GET",
>> > "prefix": "/"
>> >   },
>> >   "responseConfiguration": {
>> > "target": "http://example.com/;
>> >   }
>> > }
>> >
>> > It is not working. Something wrong in my configuration?
>> > I'm getting always timeout for it, but I'm using the default values for
>> > timeouts.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: Meecrowave Proxy

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Romain,

Ok, good catch! But my issue here was releated with the SQUID/ProxyHTTP of
the company.
They needed to allow the URL which I was trying calling. :P

Anyway, thank you man! :)

Em sex., 20 de dez. de 2019 às 13:46, Romain Manni-Bucau <
rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> It is a NPE in cookies without domain, will be fixed for next release
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le ven. 20 déc. 2019 à 17:20, Daniel Cunha  a
> écrit :
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I'm trying configure a proxy with meecrowave, I can see the test working
> > fine:
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/blob/master/meecrowave-proxy/src/test/java/org/apache/meecrowave/proxy/servlet/ProxyServletTest.java
> >
> > I'm try creating a route like:
> >
> > {
> >   "id": "example-route",
> >   "requestConfiguration": {
> > "method": "GET",
> > "prefix": "/"
> >   },
> >   "responseConfiguration": {
> > "target": "http://example.com/;
> >   }
> > }
> >
> > It is not working. Something wrong in my configuration?
> > I'm getting always timeout for it, but I'm using the default values for
> > timeouts.
> >
> > --
> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Meecrowave Proxy

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi folks,

I'm trying configure a proxy with meecrowave, I can see the test working
fine:
https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans-meecrowave/blob/master/meecrowave-proxy/src/test/java/org/apache/meecrowave/proxy/servlet/ProxyServletTest.java

I'm try creating a route like:

{
  "id": "example-route",
  "requestConfiguration": {
"method": "GET",
"prefix": "/"
  },
  "responseConfiguration": {
"target": "http://example.com/;
  }
}

It is not working. Something wrong in my configuration?
I'm getting always timeout for it, but I'm using the default values for
timeouts.

-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.6

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Em seg, 17 de dez de 2018 2:04 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com escreveu:

> Hi community,
>
> I'd like to call a vote for the openwebbeans maintenance release 1.7.6.
>
> Improvement
>
>- [OWB-1266 ] - [perf]
>InjectionResolver cache can be activated earlier
>- [OWB-1270 ] -
>"Extracting unsafe proxy code in an Unsafe class" backport into 1.7.*
> line
>
>
> SVN tag (r1849106)
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.6
>
> Staging repo is available at
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1049
>
> I've used my standard sig and key.
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openwebbeans/KEYS
>
> New release created on JIRA for the next iteration.
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] let's ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

+1. Thanks Jean-Louis! :D

Em seg, 17 de dez de 2018 às 11:50, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> +1, thanks Jean-Louis!
>
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2018, 14:36 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO 
> > Hey,
> >
> > Are we ready to roll it out then?
> > I ca do it whenever it's needed this week.
> >
> > Le lun. 3 déc. 2018 à 11:13, Daniel Cunha  a
> écrit
> > :
> >
> > > Hi Thomas,
> > >
> > > Sure, I'll close.
> > > Thank you too!
> > >
> > > Em seg, 3 de dez de 2018 às 07:11, Thomas Andraschko <
> > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > >
> > > > Merged it. Thank you Daniel for the patch!
> > > > Also "resolved" the JIRA ticket.
> > > >
> > > > @Daniel Could you please close your PR then?
> > > >
> > > > Am Sa., 1. Dez. 2018 um 17:14 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, looks good
> > > > >
> > > > > Le sam. 1 déc. 2018 14:28, Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> > > > > a écrit :
> > > > >
> > > > > > Can i merge it romain?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Do., 22. Nov. 2018, 14:39 hat Daniel Cunha <
> > daniels...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > geschrieben:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ok. patch updated again. :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:32, Daniel Cunha <
> > > > daniels...@gmail.com
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > escreveu:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ah..
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ok, I get it!
> > > > > > > > Thanks Thomas and Jon
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:30, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > > > > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >> I think you can keep ASM 7, but leave this:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13/commits/cb600aada79427ab7eff31e7da92038b6af6ed19#diff-f58069aef7df21dd8d4b0bd3546a747aR104
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> as `return Opcodes.V1_6;`.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Hope that helps.
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> Jon
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 1:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >> > +1 Thomas
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > >> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > > > > >> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > > > > >> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > > >> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > > >> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > > > > >> > <
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > >> > Le jeu. 22 nov. 2018 à 14:17, Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > > > >> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.9

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Em seg, 17 de dez de 2018 às 11:50, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> - tests in my applications are fine
> - build is fine
> - checksum matches
> - signature is fine
>
> +1
>
> Am Mo., 17. Dez. 2018 um 10:38 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I'd like to call a vote for OWB 2.0.9 release.
> >
> > Main issues are:
> >
> > [image: Major] [image: Improvement] OWB-1272
> >  [perf] enhance scan
> > excludes  Thomas
> > Andraschko
> >  >
> > RESOLVED
> > [image: Minor] [image: Improvement] OWB-1271
> >  repeatable cache
> > shouldn't
> > rely on throwing/catching NPE
> > 
> >
> > Staging repo:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1048/
> > Sources:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1048/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.9/
> > Dist Dev area: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openwebbeans/owb/
> > (rev 31564)
> > Tag:
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-2.0.9/
> > (rev 1849073)
> >
> > Please VOTE:
> >
> > [+1] go for it!
> > [-1] No, because there this ${issue} is blocking
> >
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Blog
> >  | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: Release for OWB 1.7.6

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Em seg, 10 de dez de 2018 3:28 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO  yep, just lemme know when it's done
>
> Le lun. 10 déc. 2018 à 19:11, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> a écrit :
>
> > Would be great!
> > I just about adding the performance enhacements to 1.7.x, so it would be
> > great if you could wait some days.
> >
> > <
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
> > >
> > Virenfrei.
> > www.avast.com
> > <
> >
> https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email_source=link_campaign=sig-email_content=webmail
> > >
> > <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> >
> > Am Di., 4. Dez. 2018 um 22:47 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> > jeano...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > I am happy to do the release if that helps Daniel and Thomas.
> > >
> > > Le mar. 4 déc. 2018 à 22:43, Romain Manni-Bucau  >
> > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Le mar. 4 déc. 2018 22:15, Mark Struberg 
> a
> > > > écrit :
> > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > LieGrue,
> > > > > strub
> > > > >
> > > > > > Am 04.12.2018 um 21:24 schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Basically +1
> > > > > > Should this releases then Java11 compatible?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm personally waiting for TomEE-2270 and 227, which breaks the
> > > Java11
> > > > > > usage in my case completely.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Di., 4. Dez. 2018 um 21:08 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> > > > > > daniels...@apache.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> Hi guys,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> We did some fixes on the branch owb_1.7.x and we I believe a
> good
> > > idea
> > > > > to
> > > > > >> release out 1.7.6 for update it on TomEE 7.0.x and 7.1.x
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> What do you think?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> --
> > > > > >> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > > > > >> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>

Release for OWB 1.7.6

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi guys,

We did some fixes on the branch owb_1.7.x and we I believe a good idea to
release out 1.7.6 for update it on TomEE 7.0.x and 7.1.x

What do you think?

-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Thomas,

Sure, I'll close.
Thank you too!

Em seg, 3 de dez de 2018 às 07:11, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Merged it. Thank you Daniel for the patch!
> Also "resolved" the JIRA ticket.
>
> @Daniel Could you please close your PR then?
>
> Am Sa., 1. Dez. 2018 um 17:14 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Yes, looks good
> >
> > Le sam. 1 déc. 2018 14:28, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > Can i merge it romain?
> > >
> > >
> > > Am Do., 22. Nov. 2018, 14:39 hat Daniel Cunha 
> > > geschrieben:
> > >
> > > > Ok. patch updated again. :)
> > > >
> > > > Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:32, Daniel Cunha <
> daniels...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Ah..
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, I get it!
> > > > > Thanks Thomas and Jon
> > > > >
> > > > > Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:30, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I think you can keep ASM 7, but leave this:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13/commits/cb600aada79427ab7eff31e7da92038b6af6ed19#diff-f58069aef7df21dd8d4b0bd3546a747aR104
> > > > >>
> > > > >> as `return Opcodes.V1_6;`.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hope that helps.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Jon
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 1:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > +1 Thomas
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > >> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > >> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > >> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > >> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > >> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > >> > <
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Le jeu. 22 nov. 2018 à 14:17, Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > >> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > a écrit :
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Hi Daniel,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > not sure if i didn't understand it correclty but IMO we should
> > > > >> upgrade to
> > > > >> > > ASM7 - BUT - default the bytecode version to Java6 or Java7 in
> > > > >> > > AbstractProxyFactory#determineDefaultJavaVersion.
> > > > >> > > Could you please clarify Romain?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Best regards,
> > > > >> > > Thomas
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Am Do., 22. Nov. 2018 um 13:48 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> > > > >> > > daniels...@apache.org>:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > hi folks,
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > patch updated again:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
> > > > >> :)
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 08:14, Daniel Cunha <
> > > > >> > daniels...@apache.org>
> > > > >> > > > escreveu:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Ok, in this case I'll back the asm changes. I'll update
> the
> > > > patch.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Em qua, 21 de nov de 2018 7:02 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> &

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Ok. patch updated again. :)

Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:32, Daniel Cunha 
escreveu:

> Ah..
>
> Ok, I get it!
> Thanks Thomas and Jon
>
> Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:30, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> I think you can keep ASM 7, but leave this:
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13/commits/cb600aada79427ab7eff31e7da92038b6af6ed19#diff-f58069aef7df21dd8d4b0bd3546a747aR104
>>
>> as `return Opcodes.V1_6;`.
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 1:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau > >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 Thomas
>> >
>> > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> > <
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > Le jeu. 22 nov. 2018 à 14:17, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
>> > a écrit :
>> >
>> > > Hi Daniel,
>> > >
>> > > not sure if i didn't understand it correclty but IMO we should
>> upgrade to
>> > > ASM7 - BUT - default the bytecode version to Java6 or Java7 in
>> > > AbstractProxyFactory#determineDefaultJavaVersion.
>> > > Could you please clarify Romain?
>> > >
>> > > Best regards,
>> > > Thomas
>> > >
>> > > Am Do., 22. Nov. 2018 um 13:48 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> > > daniels...@apache.org>:
>> > >
>> > > > hi folks,
>> > > >
>> > > > patch updated again: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
>> :)
>> > > >
>> > > > Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 08:14, Daniel Cunha <
>> > daniels...@apache.org>
>> > > > escreveu:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Ok, in this case I'll back the asm changes. I'll update the patch.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Em qua, 21 de nov de 2018 7:02 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com escreveu:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> +1 to not change the old default
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 21:27 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > Except the default to bytecode for java 8 - fear we have to
>> stick
>> > to
>> > > > j6
>> > > > >> or
>> > > > >> > 7 if we want to change here - it looks good.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 20:59, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > > >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > a écrit :
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > @Romain could you do a short review? I could apply it
>> tomorrow
>> > > then.
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 20:37 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> > > daniels...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > Hi Thomas,
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > I've updated the patch[1], please review it.
>> > > > >> > > > Thank you.
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:06, Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> daniels...@gmail.com
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > escreveu:
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > Hi Thomas,
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > sure. I'll working on it. In the same patch.
>> > > > >> > > > &

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Ah..

Ok, I get it!
Thanks Thomas and Jon

Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 10:30, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> I think you can keep ASM 7, but leave this:
>
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13/commits/cb600aada79427ab7eff31e7da92038b6af6ed19#diff-f58069aef7df21dd8d4b0bd3546a747aR104
>
> as `return Opcodes.V1_6;`.
>
> Hope that helps.
>
> Jon
>
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 1:26 PM Romain Manni-Bucau 
> wrote:
>
> > +1 Thomas
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le jeu. 22 nov. 2018 à 14:17, Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > Hi Daniel,
> > >
> > > not sure if i didn't understand it correclty but IMO we should upgrade
> to
> > > ASM7 - BUT - default the bytecode version to Java6 or Java7 in
> > > AbstractProxyFactory#determineDefaultJavaVersion.
> > > Could you please clarify Romain?
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Thomas
> > >
> > > Am Do., 22. Nov. 2018 um 13:48 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> > > daniels...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > hi folks,
> > > >
> > > > patch updated again: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
> :)
> > > >
> > > > Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 08:14, Daniel Cunha <
> > daniels...@apache.org>
> > > > escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Ok, in this case I'll back the asm changes. I'll update the patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Em qua, 21 de nov de 2018 7:02 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > >> +1 to not change the old default
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 21:27 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > >> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Except the default to bytecode for java 8 - fear we have to
> stick
> > to
> > > > j6
> > > > >> or
> > > > >> > 7 if we want to change here - it looks good.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 20:59, Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > >> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > a écrit :
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > @Romain could you do a short review? I could apply it tomorrow
> > > then.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 20:37 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> > > > >> > > daniels...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > I've updated the patch[1], please review it.
> > > > >> > > > Thank you.
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:06, Daniel Cunha <
> > > > >> daniels...@gmail.com
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > escreveu:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > sure. I'll working on it. In the same patch.
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:03, Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > >> > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >> Yep. Could you please provide a PR (or even a patch - i
> > have
> > > to
> > > > >> > merge
> > > > >> > > it
> > > > >> > > &g

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

hi folks,

patch updated again: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13 :)

Em qui, 22 de nov de 2018 às 08:14, Daniel Cunha 
escreveu:

> Ok, in this case I'll back the asm changes. I'll update the patch.
>
> Em qua, 21 de nov de 2018 7:02 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com escreveu:
>
>> +1 to not change the old default
>>
>> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 21:27 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > Except the default to bytecode for java 8 - fear we have to stick to j6
>> or
>> > 7 if we want to change here - it looks good.
>> >
>> > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 20:59, Thomas Andraschko <
>> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > a écrit :
>> >
>> > > @Romain could you do a short review? I could apply it tomorrow then.
>> > >
>> > > Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 20:37 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> > > daniels...@gmail.com>:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Thomas,
>> > > >
>> > > > I've updated the patch[1], please review it.
>> > > > Thank you.
>> > > >
>> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
>> > > >
>> > > > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:06, Daniel Cunha <
>> daniels...@gmail.com
>> > >
>> > > > escreveu:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Thomas,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > sure. I'll working on it. In the same patch.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:03, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Yep. Could you please provide a PR (or even a patch - i have to
>> > merge
>> > > it
>> > > > >> manually), so i can commit both?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 17:41 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> daniels...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> > Hi Thomas,
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Good catch! if we want to have support for java 11
>> (officially) on
>> > > OWB
>> > > > >> > 1.7.x, maybe is better to move it to use asm7 as well.
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 12:28, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > > > >> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> > > > >> >
>> > > > >> > > I could merge it, too but does it really make sense to apply
>> it
>> > > > >> without
>> > > > >> > > migrating to asm7?
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> > > > >> > > daniels...@apache.org>:
>> > > > >> > >
>> > > > >> > > > Hi Romain,
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > Do we have plan to merge it?
>> > > > >> > > > Em ter, 6 de nov de 2018 às 13:13, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > > >> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> > > > >> > > > escreveu:
>> > > > >> > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > Hello Daniel,
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > it is ok for me
>> > > > >> > > > >
>> > > > >> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > >> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > > > >> > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > > > >> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > > >> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
>> Book
>> > > > >> > > > > <
>> > > > >> > > > >
>&g

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Ok, in this case I'll back the asm changes. I'll update the patch.

Em qua, 21 de nov de 2018 7:02 AM, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com escreveu:

> +1 to not change the old default
>
> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 21:27 Uhr schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Except the default to bytecode for java 8 - fear we have to stick to j6
> or
> > 7 if we want to change here - it looks good.
> >
> > Le mar. 20 nov. 2018 20:59, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
> > >
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > @Romain could you do a short review? I could apply it tomorrow then.
> > >
> > > Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 20:37 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> > > daniels...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > >
> > > > I've updated the patch[1], please review it.
> > > > Thank you.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
> > > >
> > > > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:06, Daniel Cunha <
> daniels...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Thomas,
> > > > >
> > > > > sure. I'll working on it. In the same patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:03, Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Yep. Could you please provide a PR (or even a patch - i have to
> > merge
> > > it
> > > > >> manually), so i can commit both?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 17:41 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> > > > >> daniels...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Hi Thomas,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Good catch! if we want to have support for java 11 (officially)
> on
> > > OWB
> > > > >> > 1.7.x, maybe is better to move it to use asm7 as well.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 12:28, Thomas Andraschko <
> > > > >> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > I could merge it, too but does it really make sense to apply
> it
> > > > >> without
> > > > >> > > migrating to asm7?
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> > > > >> > > daniels...@apache.org>:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > Do we have plan to merge it?
> > > > >> > > > Em ter, 6 de nov de 2018 às 13:13, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > >> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> > > > escreveu:
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Hello Daniel,
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > it is ok for me
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > >> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > >> > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > >> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > >> > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > >> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > >> > > > > <
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > >
> > > > >> > > > > Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 16:39, Daniel Cunha <
> > > > daniels...@apache.org>
> > > > >> a
> > > > >> > > > éc

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Thomas,

I've updated the patch[1], please review it.
Thank you.

[1] https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13

Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:06, Daniel Cunha 
escreveu:

> Hi Thomas,
>
> sure. I'll working on it. In the same patch.
>
> Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:03, Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Yep. Could you please provide a PR (or even a patch - i have to merge it
>> manually), so i can commit both?
>>
>> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 17:41 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> daniels...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> > Hi Thomas,
>> >
>> > Good catch! if we want to have support for java 11 (officially) on OWB
>> > 1.7.x, maybe is better to move it to use asm7 as well.
>> >
>> > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 12:28, Thomas Andraschko <
>> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> >
>> > > I could merge it, too but does it really make sense to apply it
>> without
>> > > migrating to asm7?
>> > >
>> > > Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
>> > > daniels...@apache.org>:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Romain,
>> > > >
>> > > > Do we have plan to merge it?
>> > > > Em ter, 6 de nov de 2018 às 13:13, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>> > > > escreveu:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hello Daniel,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > it is ok for me
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> > > > > <
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 16:39, Daniel Cunha 
>> a
>> > > > écrit
>> > > > > :
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Romain,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > So, the change sounds good to go? Or you still see something to
>> be
>> > > > > changed?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 3:47 PM, Daniel Cunha <
>> > daniels...@gmail.com
>> > > > > > escreveu:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi Romain,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > You right, the backport include other things which are
>> important
>> > as
>> > > > > well
>> > > > > > > like:
>> > > > > > > changes on NormalScopeProxyFactory and
>> > > > > InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > But yes, the backport includes the commit that you refer. :)
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thank you for your review.
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:41, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >> Ok I get it now, so this is not *this* commit you want but
>> one
>> > > > before
>> > > > > -
>> > > > > > >> likely
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/92f94b68ae125d171ac26e6a3cbf26b6a3f54513
>> > > > > > >> - but it was included in the commit you backported ;).
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> makes sense to include that in 1.7 branch IMHO
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > >

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Thomas,

sure. I'll working on it. In the same patch.

Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 14:03, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> Yep. Could you please provide a PR (or even a patch - i have to merge it
> manually), so i can commit both?
>
> Am Di., 20. Nov. 2018 um 17:41 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> daniels...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Good catch! if we want to have support for java 11 (officially) on OWB
> > 1.7.x, maybe is better to move it to use asm7 as well.
> >
> > Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 12:28, Thomas Andraschko <
> > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> >
> > > I could merge it, too but does it really make sense to apply it without
> > > migrating to asm7?
> > >
> > > Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> > > daniels...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > > Hi Romain,
> > > >
> > > > Do we have plan to merge it?
> > > > Em ter, 6 de nov de 2018 às 13:13, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > > escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Daniel,
> > > > >
> > > > > it is ok for me
> > > > >
> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 16:39, Daniel Cunha 
> a
> > > > écrit
> > > > > :
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So, the change sounds good to go? Or you still see something to
> be
> > > > > changed?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 3:47 PM, Daniel Cunha <
> > daniels...@gmail.com
> > > > > > escreveu:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You right, the backport include other things which are
> important
> > as
> > > > > well
> > > > > > > like:
> > > > > > > changes on NormalScopeProxyFactory and
> > > > > InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But yes, the backport includes the commit that you refer. :)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you for your review.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:41, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Ok I get it now, so this is not *this* commit you want but one
> > > > before
> > > > > -
> > > > > > >> likely
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/92f94b68ae125d171ac26e6a3cbf26b6a3f54513
> > > > > > >> - but it was included in the commit you backported ;).
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> makes sense to include that in 1.7 branch IMHO
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > > > >> <
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > &g

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Thomas,

Good catch! if we want to have support for java 11 (officially) on OWB
1.7.x, maybe is better to move it to use asm7 as well.

Em ter, 20 de nov de 2018 às 12:28, Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> escreveu:

> I could merge it, too but does it really make sense to apply it without
> migrating to asm7?
>
> Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:34 Uhr schrieb Daniel Cunha <
> daniels...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi Romain,
> >
> > Do we have plan to merge it?
> > Em ter, 6 de nov de 2018 às 13:13, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > escreveu:
> >
> > > Hello Daniel,
> > >
> > > it is ok for me
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 16:39, Daniel Cunha  a
> > écrit
> > > :
> > >
> > > > Hi Romain,
> > > >
> > > > So, the change sounds good to go? Or you still see something to be
> > > changed?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 3:47 PM, Daniel Cunha  > > > escreveu:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Romain,
> > > > >
> > > > > You right, the backport include other things which are important as
> > > well
> > > > > like:
> > > > > changes on NormalScopeProxyFactory and
> > > InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.
> > > > >
> > > > > But yes, the backport includes the commit that you refer. :)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for your review.
> > > > >
> > > > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:41, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Ok I get it now, so this is not *this* commit you want but one
> > before
> > > -
> > > > >> likely
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/92f94b68ae125d171ac26e6a3cbf26b6a3f54513
> > > > >> - but it was included in the commit you backported ;).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> makes sense to include that in 1.7 branch IMHO
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > >> <
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:35, Daniel Cunha 
> a
> > > > >> écrit :
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > Of course, the issue happening when I'm using JDK11 :)
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:33, Daniel Cunha <
> > > daniels...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > >> > escreveu:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > > Hi Romain,
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Well... that change make me possible to continue create my
> > > singleton
> > > > >> > > startup like it:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
> > > > >> > > import javax.annotation.PreDestroy;
> > > > >> > > import javax.ejb.Singleton;
> > > > >> > > import javax.ejb.Startup;
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > @Singleton
> > > > >> > > @Startup
> > >

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Romain,

Do we have plan to merge it?
Em ter, 6 de nov de 2018 às 13:13, Romain Manni-Bucau 
escreveu:

> Hello Daniel,
>
> it is ok for me
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le mar. 6 nov. 2018 à 16:39, Daniel Cunha  a écrit
> :
>
> > Hi Romain,
> >
> > So, the change sounds good to go? Or you still see something to be
> changed?
> >
> >
> > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 3:47 PM, Daniel Cunha  > escreveu:
> >
> > > Hi Romain,
> > >
> > > You right, the backport include other things which are important as
> well
> > > like:
> > > changes on NormalScopeProxyFactory and
> InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.
> > >
> > > But yes, the backport includes the commit that you refer. :)
> > >
> > > Thank you for your review.
> > >
> > > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:41, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> > >
> > >> Ok I get it now, so this is not *this* commit you want but one before
> -
> > >> likely
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/92f94b68ae125d171ac26e6a3cbf26b6a3f54513
> > >> - but it was included in the commit you backported ;).
> > >>
> > >> makes sense to include that in 1.7 branch IMHO
> > >>
> > >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > >> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > >> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > >> <
> > >>
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:35, Daniel Cunha  a
> > >> écrit :
> > >>
> > >> > Of course, the issue happening when I'm using JDK11 :)
> > >> >
> > >> > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:33, Daniel Cunha <
> daniels...@gmail.com
> > >
> > >> > escreveu:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi Romain,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Well... that change make me possible to continue create my
> singleton
> > >> > > startup like it:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
> > >> > > import javax.annotation.PreDestroy;
> > >> > > import javax.ejb.Singleton;
> > >> > > import javax.ejb.Startup;
> > >> > >
> > >> > > @Singleton
> > >> > > @Startup
> > >> > > public class KernelShutdownListener {
> > >> > >
> > >> > > @PostConstruct
> > >> > > private void startup() {
> > >> > > System.out.println("ALOHA STARTUP");
> > >> > > }
> > >> > >
> > >> > > @PreDestroy
> > >> > > private void shutdown() {
> > >> > > System.out.println("ALOHA SHUTDOWN");
> > >> > > }
> > >> > > }
> > >> > >
> > >> > > It was not possible without that change, as you can see here:
> > >> > > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot get
> > >> Unsafe.defineClass
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:812)
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:801)
> > >> > > at
> java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
> > >> > Method)
> > >> > > at
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> org.apache.webbeans.p

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Romain,

So, the change sounds good to go? Or you still see something to be changed?


Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 3:47 PM, Daniel Cunha  Hi Romain,
>
> You right, the backport include other things which are important as well
> like:
> changes on NormalScopeProxyFactory and InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.
>
> But yes, the backport includes the commit that you refer. :)
>
> Thank you for your review.
>
> Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:41, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Ok I get it now, so this is not *this* commit you want but one before -
>> likely
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/commit/92f94b68ae125d171ac26e6a3cbf26b6a3f54513
>> - but it was included in the commit you backported ;).
>>
>> makes sense to include that in 1.7 branch IMHO
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> >
>>
>>
>> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:35, Daniel Cunha  a
>> écrit :
>>
>> > Of course, the issue happening when I'm using JDK11 :)
>> >
>> > Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:33, Daniel Cunha 
>> > escreveu:
>> >
>> > > Hi Romain,
>> > >
>> > > Well... that change make me possible to continue create my singleton
>> > > startup like it:
>> > >
>> > > import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
>> > > import javax.annotation.PreDestroy;
>> > > import javax.ejb.Singleton;
>> > > import javax.ejb.Startup;
>> > >
>> > > @Singleton
>> > > @Startup
>> > > public class KernelShutdownListener {
>> > >
>> > > @PostConstruct
>> > > private void startup() {
>> > > System.out.println("ALOHA STARTUP");
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > @PreDestroy
>> > > private void shutdown() {
>> > > System.out.println("ALOHA SHUTDOWN");
>> > > }
>> > > }
>> > >
>> > > It was not possible without that change, as you can see here:
>> > > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot get
>> Unsafe.defineClass
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:812)
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:801)
>> > > at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
>> > Method)
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.initializeUnsafe(AbstractProxyFactory.java:800)
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.(AbstractProxyFactory.java:91)
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.(InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.java:77)
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.(WebBeansContext.java:153)
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.(WebBeansContext.java:116)
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.openejb.cdi.ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.initialize(ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.java:167)
>> > > at org.apache.openejb.cdi.CdiBuilder.build(CdiBuilder.java:41)
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:963)
>> > > ... 17 more
>> > > Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
>> > > sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass(java.lang.String, [B, int, int,
>> > > java.lang.ClassLoader, java.security.ProtectionDomain)
>> > > at java.base/java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2476)
>> > > at
>> > >
>> >
>> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:807)
>> > > ... 27 more
>> > >
>> > > 05-Nov-2018 15:15:33.110 SEVERE [localhost-s

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Of course, the issue happening when I'm using JDK11 :)

Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:33, Daniel Cunha 
escreveu:

> Hi Romain,
>
> Well... that change make me possible to continue create my singleton
> startup like it:
>
> import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
> import javax.annotation.PreDestroy;
> import javax.ejb.Singleton;
> import javax.ejb.Startup;
>
> @Singleton
> @Startup
> public class KernelShutdownListener {
>
> @PostConstruct
> private void startup() {
> System.out.println("ALOHA STARTUP");
> }
>
> @PreDestroy
> private void shutdown() {
> System.out.println("ALOHA SHUTDOWN");
> }
> }
>
> It was not possible without that change, as you can see here:
> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot get Unsafe.defineClass
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:812)
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:801)
> at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.initializeUnsafe(AbstractProxyFactory.java:800)
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.(AbstractProxyFactory.java:91)
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.(InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.java:77)
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.(WebBeansContext.java:153)
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.(WebBeansContext.java:116)
> at
> org.apache.openejb.cdi.ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.initialize(ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.java:167)
> at org.apache.openejb.cdi.CdiBuilder.build(CdiBuilder.java:41)
> at
> org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:963)
> ... 17 more
> Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
> sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass(java.lang.String, [B, int, int,
> java.lang.ClassLoader, java.security.ProtectionDomain)
> at java.base/java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2476)
> at
> org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:807)
> ... 27 more
>
> 05-Nov-2018 15:15:33.110 SEVERE [localhost-startStop-2]
> jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke Error deploying web
> application archive [/tmp/apache-tomee-plume-7.0.6-TT.2/webapps/ROOT.war]
>  java.lang.IllegalStateException: ContainerBase.addChild: start:
> org.apache.catalina.LifecycleException: Failed to start component
> [StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[]]
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:758)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:730)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:734)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployWAR(HostConfig.java:985)
> at
> org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig$DeployWar.run(HostConfig.java:1857)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
> at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
> at
> java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
> at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)
>
>
> Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:24, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Do you know which part implies the "need", this commit was not suppose to
>> change anything since the code was already supporting java 11, it was just
>> intended to prepare potential change later on.
>> Did a small change in the behavior was introduced - if so it was not
>> intended from my part?
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <
>> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
>> >
>>
>>
>> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:20, Daniel Cunha  a
>> écrit :
>>
>> > Hi Folks,
>> >
>> > we got an issue with Java 11 and TomEE 7.0.x and we need the backport
>> for
>> > it:
>> > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
>> >
>> > Please take a look at those changes and let me know what do you think.
>> >
>> > Thank you.
>> > --
>> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
>> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>> >
>>
>
>
> --
> Daniel "soro" Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Romain,

Well... that change make me possible to continue create my singleton
startup like it:

import javax.annotation.PostConstruct;
import javax.annotation.PreDestroy;
import javax.ejb.Singleton;
import javax.ejb.Startup;

@Singleton
@Startup
public class KernelShutdownListener {

@PostConstruct
private void startup() {
System.out.println("ALOHA STARTUP");
}

@PreDestroy
private void shutdown() {
System.out.println("ALOHA SHUTDOWN");
}
}

It was not possible without that change, as you can see here:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: Cannot get Unsafe.defineClass
at
org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:812)
at
org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:801)
at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at
org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.initializeUnsafe(AbstractProxyFactory.java:800)
at
org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory.(AbstractProxyFactory.java:91)
at
org.apache.webbeans.proxy.InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.(InterceptorDecoratorProxyFactory.java:77)
at
org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.(WebBeansContext.java:153)
at
org.apache.webbeans.config.WebBeansContext.(WebBeansContext.java:116)
at
org.apache.openejb.cdi.ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.initialize(ThreadSingletonServiceImpl.java:167)
at org.apache.openejb.cdi.CdiBuilder.build(CdiBuilder.java:41)
at
org.apache.openejb.assembler.classic.Assembler.createApplication(Assembler.java:963)
... 17 more
Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException:
sun.misc.Unsafe.defineClass(java.lang.String, [B, int, int,
java.lang.ClassLoader, java.security.ProtectionDomain)
at java.base/java.lang.Class.getDeclaredMethod(Class.java:2476)
at
org.apache.webbeans.proxy.AbstractProxyFactory$4.run(AbstractProxyFactory.java:807)
... 27 more

05-Nov-2018 15:15:33.110 SEVERE [localhost-startStop-2]
jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke Error deploying web
application archive [/tmp/apache-tomee-plume-7.0.6-TT.2/webapps/ROOT.war]
 java.lang.IllegalStateException: ContainerBase.addChild: start:
org.apache.catalina.LifecycleException: Failed to start component
[StandardEngine[Catalina].StandardHost[localhost].StandardContext[]]
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChildInternal(ContainerBase.java:758)
at
org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.addChild(ContainerBase.java:730)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHost.addChild(StandardHost.java:734)
at org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig.deployWAR(HostConfig.java:985)
at
org.apache.catalina.startup.HostConfig$DeployWar.run(HostConfig.java:1857)
at
java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
at
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:834)


Em seg, 5 de nov de 2018 às 15:24, Romain Manni-Bucau 
escreveu:

> Hi Daniel,
>
> Do you know which part implies the "need", this commit was not suppose to
> change anything since the code was already supporting java 11, it was just
> intended to prepare potential change later on.
> Did a small change in the behavior was introduced - if so it was not
> intended from my part?
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
>
>
> Le lun. 5 nov. 2018 à 19:20, Daniel Cunha  a écrit
> :
>
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > we got an issue with Java 11 and TomEE 7.0.x and we need the backport for
> > it:
> > https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13
> >
> > Please take a look at those changes and let me know what do you think.
> >
> > Thank you.
> > --
> > Daniel "soro" Cunha
> > https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> >
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Backport for OWB 1.7.x

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Folks,

we got an issue with Java 11 and TomEE 7.0.x and we need the backport for
it:
https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/13

Please take a look at those changes and let me know what do you think.

Thank you.
-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

2018-04-29 5:18 GMT-03:00 Mark Struberg :

> My own +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 29.04.2018 um 09:47 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Le 29 avr. 2018 03:27, "Joseph Bergmark"  a écrit :
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Mark Struberg
> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> good evening!
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to call a VOTE to release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.5.
> >>>
> >>> The following tickets got resolved
> >>>
> >>> Bug
> >>>• [OWB-1233] - WrappedValueExpression.equals(Object arg0)
> always
> >>> false if arg0 is an instance of WrappedValueExpression
> >>>• [OWB-1235] - ConversationScope destroyed upon session
> >>> serialization/deserialization
> >>>• [OWB-1241] - Bean cache ignores qualifier model defined
> through
> >>> an AnnotatedType
> >>>
> >>> New Feature
> >>>• [OWB-1242] - Add a configuration option to not proxy Principal
> >>>
> >>> Improvement
> >>>• [OWB-1232] - replace warning about interceptors
> >>>• [OWB-1238] - Our VersionVisitor shouldn't visit code
> >>>• [OWB-1243] - improve event performance
> >>>
> >>> Task
> >>>• [OWB-1240] - Non-static inner classes should not get picked up
> >>> as CDI Beans
> >>>
> >>> Dependency upgrade
> >>>• [OWB-1236] - Update to XBean Asm 6 Shaded 4.7
> >>>• [OWB-1237] - upgrade to xbean-4.8
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> The staging repo is
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1041/
> >>>
> >>> The source distribution can be found here:
> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >>> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1041/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.5/
> >>>
> >>> The sha1 is 7fed2fe13879270ce17ee711232bdca55b08d83b
> >>>
> >>> The tag is https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/
> >>> openwebbeans-2.0.5/
> >>> -r 1830447
> >>>
> >>> Please VOTE
> >>>
> >>> [+1] yeah, let's ship it!
> >>> [+0] meh, don't care
> >>> [-1] stop there's a ${showstopper}
> >>>
> >>> The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>>
> >>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.5

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

2018-04-28 9:10 GMT-03:00 Mark Struberg :

> Hi folks!
>
> I did run all required tasks for shipping an OWB-1.7.5 release.
> This version targets CDI-1.2 / EE7 and would fit for the TomEE-7.x line.
>
> The following tickets got resolved
>
> Bug
>
> • [OWB-1197] - OwbSWClassLoader creates wrong URL
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> • [OWB-1222] - subclass proxy fails with Java9
>
> Improvement
>
> • [OWB-1218] - improve toString of producer beans to also log
> owner class
> Task
>
> • [OWB-1239] - update owb-1.7.x to java7
> • [OWB-1240] - Non-static inner classes should not get picked up
> as CDI Beans
>
> Dependency upgrade
>
> • [OWB-1236] - Update to XBean Asm 6 Shaded 4.7
> • [OWB-1237] - upgrade to xbean-4.8
>
> The source tag is -r1830409
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openwebbeans/tags/openwebbeans-1.7.5/
>
>
> The release staging repository can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1040/
>
> The source binary is in
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1040/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.5/
> It's sha1 is ddcf865490468e4e782fd596b815be9824ffe232
>
> I've used my standard sig and key.
>
>
> Please VOTE:
>
> [+1] let's ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h.
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans 2.0.4

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

2018-02-19 13:09 GMT-03:00 Reinhard Sandtner :

> +1
>
> src builds
> LICENSE fine
> NOTICE fine
> md5, sha1 ok
> gpg fine
>
> tested with meecrowave and my small test app and everything works fine
>
> lg
> reini
>
> > Am 19.02.2018 um 10:54 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau  >:
> >
> > +1 too
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau  |  Blog
> >  | Old Blog
> >  | Github  rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn  | Book
> >  ee-8-high-performance>
> >
> > 2018-02-18 21:07 GMT+01:00 Mark Struberg :
> >
> >> Aaaand here is my own +1
> >> LieGrue,strub
> >>
> >>
> >>On Friday, 16 February 2018, 13:10:03 CET, Mark Struberg
> >>  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi folks!
> >>
> >> I'd like to call a VOTE on releaseing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.4
> >>
> >> This is a CDI-2.0 maintenance release.
> >> We did now even pass all the EE TCK tests with TomEE8 since yesterday
> >> night.
> >> So time to roll a release!
> >>
> >> The following bugs and tickets got resolved:
> >>
> >> Bug
> >>
> >>• [OWB-1223] - WebContextsService does not fire BeforeDestroyed(
> ApplicationScoped.class)
> >> event
> >>• [OWB-1224] - AnnotatedTypeConfigurator does not copy parameter
> >> annotations
> >>• [OWB-1225] - configureXxx should must throw IAE if called outside
> >> respective event
> >>• [OWB-1226] - upgrade maven-bundle-plugin to more recent version
> >>• [OWB-1227] - can't add a bean through an extension and let it being
> >> scanned
> >>• [OWB-1228] - OWB ignores producer methods on custom annotatedTypes
> >>• [OWB-1229] - WebContextsService should fire
> >> BeforeDestroyed(RequestScoped.class) event
> >>• [OWB-1230] - introduce a way to block certain Extensions from
> >> getting picked up
> >>• [OWB-1231] - update jcdi-spec to 1.0.1 version
> >>
> >>
> >> The staging repository can be found at:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> >> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1038/
> >>
> >> The source zip to VOTE on is
> >> https://repository.apache.org/service/local/repositories/
> >> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1038/content/org/apache/
> >> openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.4/openwebbeans-2.0.4-source-release.zip
> >> sha1 is a5040662b2becb293ad51c2e2092680cee576aa3
> >>
> >> Please VOTE
> >>
> >> [+1] yeah, let's ship it!
> >> [+0] meh, don't care
> >> [-1] no stop, because there is a ${showstopper}
> >>
> >> The VOTE is open for 72h
> >>
> >> txs and LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
>
>


-- 
Daniel "soro" Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.0

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Daniel Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

On Jul 10, 2017 9:41 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:

+1


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau>
|
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-07-10 13:21 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>:

> Good afternoon!
>
> We are proud to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.0
>
> This is an implementation of the CDI-2.0 specification (JSR-365) which
> just got released.
>
> We already tested it with DeltaSpike, BVal and quite a few other projects,
> and it really looks fine so far!
>
> Besides implenting CDI-2.0 the following bugs and enhancements got fixed
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> projectId=12310844=12333257
>
> Sub-task
>
> • [OWB-1185] - implement Annotated#getAnnotations
> • [OWB-1186] - update logic for bootstrapping-events
> • [OWB-1187] - implement configurators
> • [OWB-1188] - implement async events
> • [OWB-1189] - add new parts to the event-api
> • [OWB-1190] - implement java-se support
> • [OWB-1192] - update logic for Instance
> • [OWB-1193] - implement InterceptionFactory
> Bug
>
> • [OWB-1179] - OWB-Arquillian scanner doesn't ignore classes with
> ClassNotFound and NoClassDefFound
> • [OWB-1183] - OWB-Arquillian does not supports implicit bean
> discovery mode
> • [OWB-1184] - arquillian connector doesn't support BDAs
> • [OWB-1196] - Signed classes can't be proxied:
> java.lang.SecurityException: class "com.Foo$$OwbNormalScopeProxy0"'s
> signer information does not match signer information of other classes in
> the same package
> • [OWB-1197] - OwbSWClassLoader creates wrong URL
> Improvement
>
> • [OWB-1135] - Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages
> • [OWB-1195] - do a codestyle analysis check and apply fidings
> before releasing OWB-2.0.0
> Task
>
> • [OWB-1087] - fix failing integration tests with java 8
> • [OWB-1182] - Implement the CDI-2.0 API
>
>
>
> The staging repo is here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1030/
>
> The Source release can be found here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapacheopenwebbeans-1030/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.0/
>
>
>
> Please VOTE:
> [+1] yeah, let's ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] no, because I found a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
>
> A special thanks to all who put their hard time into making this release
> possible!
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> the Apache OpenWebBeans team
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

Daniel Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_

On Jul 8, 2017 7:19 PM, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <jeano...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
> Le sam. 8 juil. 2017 à 19:42, Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org> a
> écrit :
>
> > +1
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> >
> > 2017-07-08 0:05 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
> >
> > > Dear lords and ladies!
> > >
> > > It's my pleasure to call a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenWebBeans-1.7.4.
> > > This is a maintenance release of our CDI-1.2 branch and a drop in
> > > replacement for OWB-1.7.3
> > >
> > > The following bugs got fixed:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?
> > > projectId=12310844=12340364
> > >
> > > Bug
> > >
> > > • [OWB-1194] - @Interceptors (EJB style) + @AroundConstruct not
> > > fully supported
> > > • [OWB-1196] - Signed classes can't be proxied:
> > > java.lang.SecurityException: class "com.Foo$$OwbNormalScopeProxy0"'s
> > > signer information does not match signer information of other classes
> in
> > > the same package
> > > Improvement
> > >
> > > • [OWB-1180] - Use getDefinedPackage instead of getPackage if
> > > available (java 9)
> > > • [OWB-1181] - fallback on unsafe when defineClass is not
> > > accessible from ClassLoader
> > >
> > >
> > > Here is the staging repo:
> > >
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1028/
> > >
> > >
> > > And here is the source release:
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapacheopenwebbeans-1028/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.7.4/
> > >
> > > The tag in our repo is http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?
> rev=1801219=rev
> > >
> > > Please VOTE:
> > >
> > > [+1] yea, let's ship it!
> > > [+0] meeeh, don't care
> > > [-1] stop, I found a ${showstopper}
> > >
> > > The VOTE is open for 72h
> > >
> > > txs and LieGrue,
> > > strub
> >
>

[jira] [Resolved] (OWB-1135) Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha resolved OWB-1135.
---
   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.7.4)
   2.0.0

> Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages
> 
>
> Key: OWB-1135
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135
> Project: OpenWebBeans
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Core
>    Reporter: Daniel Cunha
> Fix For: 2.0.0
>
> Attachments: OWB-1135.patch
>
>
> Create a ResourceBundleFactory and change it on:
> WebBeansLoggerFacade
> JULLoggerFactory
> Remove duplication of the openwebbeans/Messages into the code.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1135) Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha updated OWB-1135:
--
Summary: Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages  (was: Create 
ResourceBundleFactory)

> Remove duplication for openwebbeans/Messages
> 
>
> Key: OWB-1135
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135
> Project: OpenWebBeans
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Core
>    Reporter: Daniel Cunha
> Fix For: 1.7.4
>
> Attachments: OWB-1135.patch
>
>
> Create a ResourceBundleFactory and change it on:
> WebBeansLoggerFacade
> JULLoggerFactory
> Remove duplication of the openwebbeans/Messages into the code.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Build problem

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi folks,

last change we got a build error.
Sounds like we need update maven version from 2[1] to version >= 3.0 [2]
 on Jenkins for changes on OWB

[INFO] Internal error in the plugin manager executing goal
'org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:3.0.1:manifest': Unable to load the
mojo 'org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:3.0.1:manifest' in the plugin
'org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin'. A required class is missing:
org/apache/maven/project/DependencyResolutionException
org.apache.maven.project.DependencyResolutionException

[1]
https://maven.apache.org/components/ref/2.2.1/maven-core/apidocs/org/apache/maven/project/DependencyResolutionException.html
[2]
https://maven.apache.org/ref/3.0/maven-core/apidocs/org/apache/maven/project/DependencyResolutionException.html


-- 
Daniel Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://www.tomitribe.io

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1135) Create ResourceBundleFactory

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha updated OWB-1135:
--
Attachment: OWB-1135.patch

Patch attached.

> Create ResourceBundleFactory
> 
>
> Key: OWB-1135
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135
> Project: OpenWebBeans
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: Core
>    Reporter: Daniel Cunha
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-1, 1.6.4
>
> Attachments: OWB-1135.patch
>
>
> Create a ResourceBundleFactory and change it on:
> WebBeansLoggerFacade
> JULLoggerFactory
> Remove duplication of the openwebbeans/Messages into the code.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1135) Create ResourceBundleFactory

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

Daniel Cunha created OWB-1135:
-

 Summary: Create ResourceBundleFactory
 Key: OWB-1135
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1135
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Core
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
 Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-1, 1.6.4


Create a ResourceBundleFactory and change it on:
WebBeansLoggerFacade
JULLoggerFactory

Remove duplication of the openwebbeans/Messages into the code.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Re: CDI 2.0 Spec JAR

[Daniel Cunha]

Cool!

I have a patch to update maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin.
I had work on some changes on branch cdi-2.0 and I get some problems with
java8.

It's necessary update this plugins to have build working fine, so I'll be
possible to use java8 features on the code. :)

Let me see what do you think about it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>
wrote:

> txs will apply.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Monday, 11 July 2016, 2:43, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > I've raised a JIRA with the API changes that I noticed.  There might
> be a
> > few more pending.  I tested it against Weld, apparently they're behind a
> > little bit as well.
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553
> >
> > - John
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:46 PM Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>  >  Only constraint we
> >>  > have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK.
> >>
> >>  Except we wrote that stuff ourselves for the spec. In that case the
> >>  original author is of course free to also contribute it to the ASF
> under
> >>  ALv2.
> >>
> >>  LieGrue,
> >>  strub
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  > Am 03.07.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau
> > <rmannibu...@gmail.com
> >>  >:
> >>  >
> >>  > Le 3 juil. 2016 22:56, "John D. Ament"
> > <johndam...@apache.org> a écrit :
> >>  >>
> >>  >> geronimo@ who?
> >>  >
> >>  > Dev list
> >>  >
> >>  >>
> >>  >> I emailed the OWB list as the OWB team is maintaining the JAR,
> > there's
> >>  > just
> >>  >> considerable overlap w/ the geronimo PMC that it becomes
> > confusing.
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>  > Well you can also see geronimo community is doing so since people
> >>  overlap a
> >>  > lot there but strictly speaking this jar is not always driven by owb.
> >>  >
> >>  >> What about my comments about the javadocs?
> >>  >>
> >>  >
> >>  > It is usually best effort but im +1 to make it better. Only
> constraint
> > we
> >>  > have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK.
> >>  >
> >>  >> John
> >>  >>
> >>  >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:24 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>  rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> >>  >> wrote:
> >>  >>
> >>  >>> Hi John,
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> -> geronimo@ ;)
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> Otherwise +1 for jenkins and to replace current 2.0 by an up
> > to date
> >>  >>> version
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>  >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>  >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress
> > Blog
> >>  >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >>  >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>  >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> |
> > Tomitriber
> >>  >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> >>  >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>> 2016-07-03 15:10 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament
> > <johndam...@apache.org>:
> >>  >>>
> >>  >>>> Hey guys
> >>  >>>>
> >>  >>>> I'm looking at the current state of the Geronimo CDI 2
> > spec jar.  I'm
> >>  >>>> wondering, what version of CDI 2 is it based on currently?
> >>  >>>>
> >>  >>>> In addition, I'm planning to apply patches to it based
> > on the changes
> >>  > in
> >>  >>>> CDI 2.  I notice that unlike most geronimo specs, its
> > pretty heavy on
> >>  >>>> javadocs.  I plan to restate them, similar to what i'm
> > seeing in here.
> >>  >>>>
> >>  >>>> I'm wondering if we can enable a build in jenkins to
> > build the JAR?
> >>  >>>>
> >>  >>>> John
> >>  >>>>
> >>  >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Daniel Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://www.tomitribe.io

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-1134) Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha updated OWB-1134:
--
Attachment: OWB-1134.patch

> Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and 
> maven-checkstyle-plugin
> --
>
> Key: OWB-1134
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134
> Project: OpenWebBeans
>  Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
>  Components: Core
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-1
>    Reporter: Daniel Cunha
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-1
>
> Attachments: OWB-1134.patch
>
>
> maven-bundle-plugin 2.1.0 not work for java8:
> {code}
> [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.1.0:manifest (bundle-manifest) @ 
> openwebbeans-impl ---
> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 18
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFile(Clazz.java:179)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFile(Clazz.java:102)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFileWithCollector(Clazz.java:91)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFile(Clazz.java:80)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.analyzeJar(Analyzer.java:1361)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.analyzeBundleClasspath(Analyzer.java:1276)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.PackageVersionAnalyzer.analyzeBundleClasspath(PackageVersionAnalyzer.java:43)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.analyze(Analyzer.java:105)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Builder.analyze(Builder.java:198)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.calcManifest(Analyzer.java:283)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.ManifestPlugin.getAnalyzer(ManifestPlugin.java:197)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.ManifestPlugin.getManifest(ManifestPlugin.java:112)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.ManifestPlugin.execute(ManifestPlugin.java:66)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.BundlePlugin.execute(BundlePlugin.java:238)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.BundlePlugin.execute(BundlePlugin.java:229)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBuildPluginManager.java:134)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:207)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:153)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:145)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject(LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:116)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.multithreaded.MultiThreadedBuilder$1.call(MultiThreadedBuilder.java:185)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.multithreaded.MultiThreadedBuilder$1.call(MultiThreadedBuilder.java:181)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Should not skip: ^
> [ERROR] Error in manifest for 
> org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-impl:jar:2.0.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT : 
> Invalid class file: org/apache/webbeans/container/BeanManagerImpl.class
> [ERROR] Error(s) found in manifest configuration
> {code}
> maven-checkstyle-plugin 2.7 not work for java8:
> {code}
> /home/dcunha/git/apache/openwebbeans/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/container/BeanManagerImpl.java:318:70:
>  unexpected token: >
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-1134) Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15363586#comment-15363586
 ] 

Daniel Cunha commented on OWB-1134:
---

Patch attached. :)

> Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and 
> maven-checkstyle-plugin
> --
>
> Key: OWB-1134
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134
> Project: OpenWebBeans
>  Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
>  Components: Core
>Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-1
>    Reporter: Daniel Cunha
> Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-1
>
> Attachments: OWB-1134.patch
>
>
> maven-bundle-plugin 2.1.0 not work for java8:
> {code}
> [INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.1.0:manifest (bundle-manifest) @ 
> openwebbeans-impl ---
> java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 18
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFile(Clazz.java:179)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFile(Clazz.java:102)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFileWithCollector(Clazz.java:91)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFile(Clazz.java:80)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.analyzeJar(Analyzer.java:1361)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.analyzeBundleClasspath(Analyzer.java:1276)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.PackageVersionAnalyzer.analyzeBundleClasspath(PackageVersionAnalyzer.java:43)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.analyze(Analyzer.java:105)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Builder.analyze(Builder.java:198)
> at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.calcManifest(Analyzer.java:283)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.ManifestPlugin.getAnalyzer(ManifestPlugin.java:197)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.ManifestPlugin.getManifest(ManifestPlugin.java:112)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.ManifestPlugin.execute(ManifestPlugin.java:66)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.BundlePlugin.execute(BundlePlugin.java:238)
> at 
> org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.BundlePlugin.execute(BundlePlugin.java:229)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBuildPluginManager.java:134)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:207)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:153)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:145)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject(LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:116)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.multithreaded.MultiThreadedBuilder$1.call(MultiThreadedBuilder.java:185)
> at 
> org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.multithreaded.MultiThreadedBuilder$1.call(MultiThreadedBuilder.java:181)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at 
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
> at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
> at 
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
> Should not skip: ^
> [ERROR] Error in manifest for 
> org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-impl:jar:2.0.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT : 
> Invalid class file: org/apache/webbeans/container/BeanManagerImpl.class
> [ERROR] Error(s) found in manifest configuration
> {code}
> maven-checkstyle-plugin 2.7 not work for java8:
> {code}
> /home/dcunha/git/apache/openwebbeans/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/container/BeanManagerImpl.java:318:70:
>  unexpected token: >
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Created] (OWB-1134) Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

Daniel Cunha created OWB-1134:
-

 Summary: Upgrade plugins to support Java 8: maven-bundle-plugin 
and maven-checkstyle-plugin
 Key: OWB-1134
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Dependency upgrade
  Components: Core
Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha-1
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
 Fix For: 2.0.0-alpha-1


maven-bundle-plugin 2.1.0 not work for java8:
{code}
[INFO] --- maven-bundle-plugin:2.1.0:manifest (bundle-manifest) @ 
openwebbeans-impl ---
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 18
at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFile(Clazz.java:179)
at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFile(Clazz.java:102)
at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFileWithCollector(Clazz.java:91)
at aQute.lib.osgi.Clazz.parseClassFile(Clazz.java:80)
at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.analyzeJar(Analyzer.java:1361)
at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.analyzeBundleClasspath(Analyzer.java:1276)
at 
org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.PackageVersionAnalyzer.analyzeBundleClasspath(PackageVersionAnalyzer.java:43)
at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.analyze(Analyzer.java:105)
at aQute.lib.osgi.Builder.analyze(Builder.java:198)
at aQute.lib.osgi.Analyzer.calcManifest(Analyzer.java:283)
at 
org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.ManifestPlugin.getAnalyzer(ManifestPlugin.java:197)
at 
org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.ManifestPlugin.getManifest(ManifestPlugin.java:112)
at 
org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.ManifestPlugin.execute(ManifestPlugin.java:66)
at 
org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.BundlePlugin.execute(BundlePlugin.java:238)
at 
org.apache.felix.bundleplugin.BundlePlugin.execute(BundlePlugin.java:229)
at 
org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultBuildPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultBuildPluginManager.java:134)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:207)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:153)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.MojoExecutor.execute(MojoExecutor.java:145)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.LifecycleModuleBuilder.buildProject(LifecycleModuleBuilder.java:116)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.multithreaded.MultiThreadedBuilder$1.call(MultiThreadedBuilder.java:185)
at 
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.internal.builder.multithreaded.MultiThreadedBuilder$1.call(MultiThreadedBuilder.java:181)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Should not skip: ^
[ERROR] Error in manifest for 
org.apache.openwebbeans:openwebbeans-impl:jar:2.0.0-alpha-1-SNAPSHOT : Invalid 
class file: org/apache/webbeans/container/BeanManagerImpl.class
[ERROR] Error(s) found in manifest configuration
{code}

maven-checkstyle-plugin 2.7 not work for java8:
{code}
/home/dcunha/git/apache/openwebbeans/webbeans-impl/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/container/BeanManagerImpl.java:318:70:
 unexpected token: >
{code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Re: [VOTE] Release OpenWebBeans-1.6.2

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:

 Hi!

 I'd like to call a VOTE for a maintenance release of Apache
 OpenWebBeans-1.6.2.

 We fixed 2 bugs which are needed by TomEE-7.x

 Here is the staging repo:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1015/

 And here is the source release:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1015/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.2/openwebbeans-1.6.2-source-release.zip


 [+1] let's ship it
 [+0] meh don't care
 [-1] nope, because ${reason}

 The VOTE is open for 72h.


 txs and LieGrue,
 strub




-- 
Best regard,
Daniel Cunha (soro)

Re: [VOTE] for Apache OpenWebBeans 1.6.1

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Adam Cornett adam.corn...@gmail.com
wrote:

 +1

 On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:10 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:

  Hi!
 
  I’d like to call a VOTE on Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.1.
 
  The staging repository is here
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1014/
 
  The source repo is available here
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1014/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.1/openwebbeans-1.6.1-source-release.zip
 
 
  The binary distribution can be found at
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1014/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.6.1/openwebbeans-distribution-1.6.1-binary.zip
 
  [+1] ship it
  [+0] meh, don’t care
  [-1] stop, because of ${blocker}
 
  The VOTE is open for 72h
 
  txs and LieGrue,
  strub
 
 


 --
 Adam Cornett
 adam.corn...@gmail.com
 (678) 296-1150




-- 
Best regard,
Daniel Cunha (soro)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.0

[Daniel Cunha]

+1

On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 6:23 AM, Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 i've upgraded several projects to v1.6.0 (e.g. [1] and [2]) and all tests
 look fine.
 - +1

 regards,
 gerhard

 [1] https://github.com/CDIatWork/IdeaFork
 [2]

 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/deltaspike/repo?p=deltaspike.git;a=summary



 2015-06-01 17:29 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de:

  Hi!
 
  I’d like to call a VOTE on Apache OpenWebBeans-1.6.0.
 
  The staging repository is here
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1013/
 
  The source repo is available here
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1013/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.0/openwebbeans-1.6.0-source-release.zip
  sha1 is 0ba823cd2b10501e47f46f01ff76ae487bf29abd
 
 
  The binary distribution can be found at
 
 
 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1013/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans-distribution/1.6.0/openwebbeans-distribution-1.6.0-binary.zip
 
  For testing unzip it and use the provided shell and cmd scripts to
 install
  it into a tomcat7 or tomcat8.
  I will write elaborated docs for those scripts after the release is done.
 
  [+1] ship it
  [+0] meh, don’t care
  [-1] stop, because of ${blocker}
 
  The VOTE is open for 72h
 
  txs and LieGrue,
  strub
 
 
  PS: if you like to build it from source yourself then you also need to
 add
  the staging repo for xbean-4.3. The xbean release already got enough +1
 but
  the 72h are not yet over…




-- 
Best regard,
Daniel Cunha (soro)

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans-trunk #1128

[Daniel Cunha]

It's weird!
You are missing these files:

webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/MyAbstract.java
webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/MyBean.java
webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/MyInterface.java
webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/StringBean.java
webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/StringBeanAbstract.java

But the patch has this classes.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12736169/OWB-654.patch


On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Apache Jenkins Server 
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:

 See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/1128/changes

 Changes:

 [struberg] OWB-654 fix manual lookup of beans with generic types

 Txs to Daniel Cunha (soro) for the patch!

 [struberg] add ASM license and notice to our distribution packages

 [struberg] OWB-1077 add install script for OWB + MyFaces on Tomcat7  8

 [struberg] fix modifier ordering

 to make sonar happy...

 --
 [...truncated 66 lines...]
 [INFO]   SPI definition
 [INFO]   OpenWebBeans Core
 [INFO]   EE Common plugin
 [INFO]   EL 2.2 plugin
 [INFO]   Web plugin
 [INFO]   EJB plugin
 [INFO]   Java EE plugin
 [INFO]   Tomcat 6 plugin
 [INFO]   Tomcat 7 plugin
 [INFO]   JMS plugin
 [INFO]   JSF-2 plugin
 [INFO]   EL 1.0 plugin
 [INFO]   JSF 1.2 plugin
 [INFO]   EE Resource plugin
 [INFO]   EE Resource plugin
 [INFO]   OSGi plugin
 [INFO]   TCK Porting Pkg
 [INFO]   OWB Arquillian Parent
 [INFO]   OpenWebBeans-Standalone Arquillian connector
 [INFO]   OWB Samples
 [INFO]   Sample Guess Application
 [INFO]   JSF Conversation Sample
 [INFO]   Sample JSF2 Application
 [INFO]   Sample Hotel Reservation Application
 [INFO]   Tomcat Sample
 [INFO]   Tomcat 7 Sample
 [INFO]   OpenWebBeans Java SE Sample
 [INFO]   OWB JSR-330 TCK
 [INFO]   JSR-346 TCK runner
 [INFO]   Distribution Pkg
 [INFO]   Documentation
 [INFO]
 
 [INFO] Building Apache OpenWebBeans
 [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
 [INFO]
 
 [INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
 [INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
 [INFO] [bundle:manifest {execution: bundle-manifest}]
 [WARNING] Ignoring project type pom - supportedProjectTypes = [jar,
 bundle, war]
 [INFO] [site:attach-descriptor {execution: default-attach-descriptor}]
 [INFO] Preparing source:jar
 [WARNING] Removing: jar from forked lifecycle, to prevent recursive
 invocation.
 [INFO] No goals needed for project - skipping
 [INFO] [source:jar {execution: default}]
 [INFO] [checkstyle:check {execution: verify-style}]
 [INFO] Starting audit...
 Audit done.

 [INFO] [apache-rat:check {execution: default}]
 [INFO] Exclude: **/*/MANIFEST.MF
 [INFO] Exclude: .git
 [INFO] Exclude: .gitignore
 [INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}]
 [INFO] Installing 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/pom.xml to
 /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/1/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT/openwebbeans-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom
 [INFO] Installing 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/target/openwebbeans-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT-site.xml
 to
 /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/1/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT/openwebbeans-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT-site.xml
 [INFO]
 
 [INFO] Building SPI definition
 [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
 [INFO]
 
 [INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
 [INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
 [INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
 [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
 [INFO] Copying 0 resource
 [INFO] Copying 3 resources
 [INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
 [INFO] Changes detected - recompiling the module!
 [INFO] Compiling 20 source files to 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/webbeans-spi/target/classes
 
 [WARNING] Note: 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/webbeans-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/ScannerService.java
 uses or overrides a deprecated API.
 [WARNING] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:deprecation for details.
 [WARNING] Note: 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/webbeans-spi/src/main/java/org/apache/webbeans/spi/api/ResourceReference.java
 uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
 [WARNING] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
 [INFO] [bundle:manifest {execution: bundle-manifest}]
 [INFO] [resources:testResources {execution: default-testResources}]
 [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
 [INFO

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans-trunk #1128

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi Mark,

works fine now:

owb-bot build #402 of owb-site-production started
owb-bot build #402 of owb-site-production is complete: Success [build
successful]  Build details are at
http://ci.apache.org/builders/owb-site-production/builds/402

Thank you Mark!


On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:

 Hi Daniel, probably I missed that in the commit. Will check
 LieGrue,
 strub


  Am 31.05.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
 
  It's weird!
  You are missing these files:
 
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/MyAbstract.java
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/MyBean.java
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/MyInterface.java
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/StringBean.java
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/StringBeanAbstract.java
 
  But the patch has this classes.
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12736169/OWB-654.patch
 
 
  On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Apache Jenkins Server 
  jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
 
  See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/1128/changes
 
  Changes:
 
  [struberg] OWB-654 fix manual lookup of beans with generic types
 
  Txs to Daniel Cunha (soro) for the patch!
 
  [struberg] add ASM license and notice to our distribution packages
 
  [struberg] OWB-1077 add install script for OWB + MyFaces on Tomcat7  8
 
  [struberg] fix modifier ordering
 
  to make sonar happy...
 
  --
  [...truncated 66 lines...]
  [INFO]   SPI definition
  [INFO]   OpenWebBeans Core
  [INFO]   EE Common plugin
  [INFO]   EL 2.2 plugin
  [INFO]   Web plugin
  [INFO]   EJB plugin
  [INFO]   Java EE plugin
  [INFO]   Tomcat 6 plugin
  [INFO]   Tomcat 7 plugin
  [INFO]   JMS plugin
  [INFO]   JSF-2 plugin
  [INFO]   EL 1.0 plugin
  [INFO]   JSF 1.2 plugin
  [INFO]   EE Resource plugin
  [INFO]   EE Resource plugin
  [INFO]   OSGi plugin
  [INFO]   TCK Porting Pkg
  [INFO]   OWB Arquillian Parent
  [INFO]   OpenWebBeans-Standalone Arquillian connector
  [INFO]   OWB Samples
  [INFO]   Sample Guess Application
  [INFO]   JSF Conversation Sample
  [INFO]   Sample JSF2 Application
  [INFO]   Sample Hotel Reservation Application
  [INFO]   Tomcat Sample
  [INFO]   Tomcat 7 Sample
  [INFO]   OpenWebBeans Java SE Sample
  [INFO]   OWB JSR-330 TCK
  [INFO]   JSR-346 TCK runner
  [INFO]   Distribution Pkg
  [INFO]   Documentation
  [INFO]
  
  [INFO] Building Apache OpenWebBeans
  [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
  [INFO]
  
  [INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
  [INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
  [INFO] [bundle:manifest {execution: bundle-manifest}]
  [WARNING] Ignoring project type pom - supportedProjectTypes = [jar,
  bundle, war]
  [INFO] [site:attach-descriptor {execution: default-attach-descriptor}]
  [INFO] Preparing source:jar
  [WARNING] Removing: jar from forked lifecycle, to prevent recursive
  invocation.
  [INFO] No goals needed for project - skipping
  [INFO] [source:jar {execution: default}]
  [INFO] [checkstyle:check {execution: verify-style}]
  [INFO] Starting audit...
  Audit done.
 
  [INFO] [apache-rat:check {execution: default}]
  [INFO] Exclude: **/*/MANIFEST.MF
  [INFO] Exclude: .git
  [INFO] Exclude: .gitignore
  [INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}]
  [INFO] Installing 
  https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/pom.xml to
 
 /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/1/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT/openwebbeans-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom
  [INFO] Installing 
 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/target/openwebbeans-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT-site.xml
 
  to
 
 /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/1/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT/openwebbeans-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT-site.xml
  [INFO]
  
  [INFO] Building SPI definition
  [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
  [INFO]
  
  [INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
  [INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
  [INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
  [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
  [INFO] Copying 0 resource
  [INFO] Copying 3 resources
  [INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
  [INFO] Changes detected - recompiling the module!
  [INFO] Compiling 20 source files to 
 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/webbeans-spi/target/classes
 
  [WARNING] Note: 
 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: OpenWebBeans-trunk #1128

[Daniel Cunha]

Ops

I think that we don't want to see this build.
But, I saw the changes.

Thank you Mark! :)

On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Mark,

 works fine now:

 owb-bot build #402 of owb-site-production started
 owb-bot build #402 of owb-site-production is complete: Success [build
 successful]  Build details are at
 http://ci.apache.org/builders/owb-site-production/builds/402

 Thank you Mark!


 On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:

 Hi Daniel, probably I missed that in the commit. Will check
 LieGrue,
 strub


  Am 31.05.2015 um 08:38 schrieb Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:
 
  It's weird!
  You are missing these files:
 
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/MyAbstract.java
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/MyBean.java
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/MyInterface.java
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/StringBean.java
 
 webbeans-impl/src/test/java/org/apache/webbeans/test/injection/generics/StringBeanAbstract.java
 
  But the patch has this classes.
  https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12736169/OWB-654.patch
 
 
  On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Apache Jenkins Server 
  jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
 
  See https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/1128/changes
 
  Changes:
 
  [struberg] OWB-654 fix manual lookup of beans with generic types
 
  Txs to Daniel Cunha (soro) for the patch!
 
  [struberg] add ASM license and notice to our distribution packages
 
  [struberg] OWB-1077 add install script for OWB + MyFaces on Tomcat7  8
 
  [struberg] fix modifier ordering
 
  to make sonar happy...
 
  --
  [...truncated 66 lines...]
  [INFO]   SPI definition
  [INFO]   OpenWebBeans Core
  [INFO]   EE Common plugin
  [INFO]   EL 2.2 plugin
  [INFO]   Web plugin
  [INFO]   EJB plugin
  [INFO]   Java EE plugin
  [INFO]   Tomcat 6 plugin
  [INFO]   Tomcat 7 plugin
  [INFO]   JMS plugin
  [INFO]   JSF-2 plugin
  [INFO]   EL 1.0 plugin
  [INFO]   JSF 1.2 plugin
  [INFO]   EE Resource plugin
  [INFO]   EE Resource plugin
  [INFO]   OSGi plugin
  [INFO]   TCK Porting Pkg
  [INFO]   OWB Arquillian Parent
  [INFO]   OpenWebBeans-Standalone Arquillian connector
  [INFO]   OWB Samples
  [INFO]   Sample Guess Application
  [INFO]   JSF Conversation Sample
  [INFO]   Sample JSF2 Application
  [INFO]   Sample Hotel Reservation Application
  [INFO]   Tomcat Sample
  [INFO]   Tomcat 7 Sample
  [INFO]   OpenWebBeans Java SE Sample
  [INFO]   OWB JSR-330 TCK
  [INFO]   JSR-346 TCK runner
  [INFO]   Distribution Pkg
  [INFO]   Documentation
  [INFO]
 
 
  [INFO] Building Apache OpenWebBeans
  [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
  [INFO]
 
 
  [INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
  [INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
  [INFO] [bundle:manifest {execution: bundle-manifest}]
  [WARNING] Ignoring project type pom - supportedProjectTypes = [jar,
  bundle, war]
  [INFO] [site:attach-descriptor {execution: default-attach-descriptor}]
  [INFO] Preparing source:jar
  [WARNING] Removing: jar from forked lifecycle, to prevent recursive
  invocation.
  [INFO] No goals needed for project - skipping
  [INFO] [source:jar {execution: default}]
  [INFO] [checkstyle:check {execution: verify-style}]
  [INFO] Starting audit...
  Audit done.
 
  [INFO] [apache-rat:check {execution: default}]
  [INFO] Exclude: **/*/MANIFEST.MF
  [INFO] Exclude: .git
  [INFO] Exclude: .gitignore
  [INFO] [install:install {execution: default-install}]
  [INFO] Installing 
  https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/pom.xml to
 
 /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/1/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT/openwebbeans-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT.pom
  [INFO] Installing 
 
 https://builds.apache.org/job/OpenWebBeans-trunk/ws/trunk/target/openwebbeans-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT-site.xml
 
  to
 
 /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/1/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/1.6.0-SNAPSHOT/openwebbeans-1.6.0-SNAPSHOT-site.xml
  [INFO]
 
 
  [INFO] Building SPI definition
  [INFO]task-segment: [clean, install]
  [INFO]
 
 
  [INFO] [clean:clean {execution: default-clean}]
  [INFO] [remote-resources:process {execution: default}]
  [INFO] [resources:resources {execution: default-resources}]
  [INFO] Using 'UTF-8' encoding to copy filtered resources.
  [INFO] Copying 0 resource
  [INFO] Copying 3 resources
  [INFO] [compiler:compile {execution: default-compile}]
  [INFO] Changes detected - recompiling the module!
  [INFO] Compiling 20

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-654) manual lookups of beans with generics fail

[Daniel Cunha (soro) (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha (soro) updated OWB-654:

Attachment: OWB-654.patch

 manual lookups of beans with generics fail
 --

 Key: OWB-654
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Injection and Lookup
Affects Versions: 1.1.3
Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
Assignee: Mark Struberg
 Fix For: 1.6.0

 Attachments: OWB-654.patch, OWB-654_test.zip


 the type-check it too strict right now.
 e.g. for:
 public interface CustomBeanT
 {
   //...
 }
 public class CustomBeanImpl implements CustomBeanString
 {
   //...
 }
 the manual lookup by type with CustomBean.class fails, but it works 
 correctly e.g. in case of:
 public class CustomBeanImpl implements CustomBean
 {
   //...
 }



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-654) manual lookups of beans with generics fail

[Daniel Cunha (soro) (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14564175#comment-14564175
 ] 

Daniel Cunha (soro) commented on OWB-654:
-

Hi folks,

Good news. 
Now, the test passed in OWB 1.6.0-SNAPSHOT and we don't have regression in IMPL 
test and TCK. 

I'll prepare the patch later. It's too later now here. 
See you guys. :)

 manual lookups of beans with generics fail
 --

 Key: OWB-654
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-654
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Injection and Lookup
Affects Versions: 1.1.3
Reporter: Gerhard Petracek
Assignee: Mark Struberg
 Fix For: 1.6.0

 Attachments: OWB-654_test.zip


 the type-check it too strict right now.
 e.g. for:
 public interface CustomBeanT
 {
   //...
 }
 public class CustomBeanImpl implements CustomBeanString
 {
   //...
 }
 the manual lookup by type with CustomBean.class fails, but it works 
 correctly e.g. in case of:
 public class CustomBeanImpl implements CustomBean
 {
   //...
 }



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Welcome Reinhard Sandtner as new Apache OpenWebBeans committer

[Daniel Cunha]

Congrats Reinhard. :D

--
Daniel Cunha (soro) http://www.cejug.net
Blog: http://www.danielsoro.com.br
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dvlc_
GitHub: https://github.com/danielsoro
LinkedIn:  http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielvlcunha
Sent from my cell phone
Em 30/09/2014 07:59, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de escreveu:

 Good evening!

 The Apache OpenWebBeans community likes to welcome Reinhard Sandtner
 (rsandtner) as new committer!

 Reinhard shipped a dozen high-quality patches to help passing the CDI TCK.

 We are now down to 15 failing TCK tests (from almost 1000) and hope to fix
 those as well in the next week.

 Reinhard, txs for joining our project and I hope you have lots of fun
 hacking on OWB!


 the Apache OpenWebBeans PMC

[jira] [Created] (OWB-989) Clean info issue on Sonar

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

Daniel Cunha created OWB-989:


 Summary: Clean info issue on Sonar
 Key: OWB-989
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-989
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
Priority: Trivial






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-989) Clean info issue on Sonar

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha updated OWB-989:
-

Attachment: OWB-989.patch

 Clean info issue on Sonar
 -

 Key: OWB-989
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-989
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: OWB-989.patch






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-989) Clean info issue on Sonar

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-989?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha updated OWB-989:
-

Attachment: OWB-989-updated.patch

Patch updated.

 Clean info issue on Sonar
 -

 Key: OWB-989
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-989
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: OWB-989-updated.patch, OWB-989.patch






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

OWB-983 Patch

[Daniel Cunha]

Hi guys,

I worked in a simple patch to sample. Can someone review it?

OWB-983

Thanks.

--
Daniel Cunha (soro)
Sent from my cell phone.

[jira] [Created] (OWB-983) sample/tomcat7-sample doesn't run with 'mvn tomcat7:run'

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

Daniel Cunha created OWB-983:


 Summary: sample/tomcat7-sample doesn't run with 'mvn tomcat7:run'
 Key: OWB-983
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-983
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
Priority: Minor






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-983) sample/tomcat7-sample doesn't run with 'mvn tomcat7:run'

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-983?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha updated OWB-983:
-

Attachment: OWB-983.patch

 sample/tomcat7-sample doesn't run with 'mvn tomcat7:run'
 

 Key: OWB-983
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-983
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
Priority: Minor
 Attachments: OWB-983.patch






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

[jira] [Commented] (OWB-965) Create index to tomcat-sample

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14019656#comment-14019656
 ] 

Daniel Cunha commented on OWB-965:
--

Mark, No rush. When you finish, you can merge it.

 Create index to tomcat-sample
 -

 Key: OWB-965
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Samples  Documentation
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch, 
 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-965) Create index to tomcat-sample

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha updated OWB-965:
-

Attachment: 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch

 Create index to tomcat-sample
 -

 Key: OWB-965
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Samples  Documentation
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

[jira] [Created] (OWB-965) Create index to tomcat-sample

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

Daniel Cunha created OWB-965:


 Summary: Create index to tomcat-sample
 Key: OWB-965
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Samples  Documentation
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch





--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

[jira] [Updated] (OWB-965) Create index to tomcat-sample

[Daniel Cunha (JIRA)]

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Daniel Cunha updated OWB-965:
-

Attachment: 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch

Added license.

 Create index to tomcat-sample
 -

 Key: OWB-965
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-965
 Project: OpenWebBeans
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Samples  Documentation
Reporter: Daniel Cunha
Priority: Trivial
 Attachments: 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch, 
 0001-Create-a-index-to-tomcat-sample.patch






--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Added initial .gitignore file.

[Daniel Cunha]

Hey folks,

I sent a PR to added a initial gitignore file. :)

PR: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/1

-- 
Att;
Daniel Cunha (soro)

Re: Added initial .gitignore file.

[Daniel Cunha]

Thanks Jean,

I hope contribute more.


On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com
wrote:

 Doing that now



 2014-06-04 12:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Cunha daniels...@gmail.com:

  Hey folks,
 
  I sent a PR to added a initial gitignore file. :)
 
  PR: https://github.com/apache/openwebbeans/pull/1
 
  --
  Att;
  Daniel Cunha (soro)
 



 --
 Jean-Louis




-- 
Att;
Daniel Cunha (soro)