Cool! I have a patch to update maven-bundle-plugin and maven-checkstyle-plugin. I had work on some changes on branch cdi-2.0 and I get some problems with java8.
It's necessary update this plugins to have build working fine, so I'll be possible to use java8 features on the code. :) Let me see what do you think about it: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-1134 On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote: > txs will apply. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > > > On Monday, 11 July 2016, 2:43, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I've raised a JIRA with the API changes that I noticed. There might > be a > > few more pending. I tested it against Weld, apparently they're behind a > > little bit as well. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 > > > > - John > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 2:46 PM Mark Struberg <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > Only constraint we > >> > have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK. > >> > >> Except we wrote that stuff ourselves for the spec. In that case the > >> original author is of course free to also contribute it to the ASF > under > >> ALv2. > >> > >> LieGrue, > >> strub > >> > >> > >> > >> > Am 03.07.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > > <[email protected] > >> >: > >> > > >> > Le 3 juil. 2016 22:56, "John D. Ament" > > <[email protected]> a écrit : > >> >> > >> >> geronimo@ who? > >> > > >> > Dev list > >> > > >> >> > >> >> I emailed the OWB list as the OWB team is maintaining the JAR, > > there's > >> > just > >> >> considerable overlap w/ the geronimo PMC that it becomes > > confusing. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Well you can also see geronimo community is doing so since people > >> overlap a > >> > lot there but strictly speaking this jar is not always driven by owb. > >> > > >> >> What about my comments about the javadocs? > >> >> > >> > > >> > It is usually best effort but im +1 to make it better. Only > constraint > > we > >> > have is to not copy official comments/spec AFAIK. > >> > > >> >> John > >> >> > >> >> On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 3:24 PM Romain Manni-Bucau < > >> [email protected]> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> Hi John, > >> >>> > >> >>> -> geronimo@ ;) > >> >>> > >> >>> Otherwise +1 for jenkins and to replace current 2.0 by an up > > to date > >> >>> version > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau > >> >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > >> >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress > > Blog > >> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > >> >>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > >> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | > > Tomitriber > >> >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > >> >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > >> >>> > >> >>> 2016-07-03 15:10 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament > > <[email protected]>: > >> >>> > >> >>>> Hey guys > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I'm looking at the current state of the Geronimo CDI 2 > > spec jar. I'm > >> >>>> wondering, what version of CDI 2 is it based on currently? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> In addition, I'm planning to apply patches to it based > > on the changes > >> > in > >> >>>> CDI 2. I notice that unlike most geronimo specs, its > > pretty heavy on > >> >>>> javadocs. I plan to restate them, similar to what i'm > > seeing in here. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> I'm wondering if we can enable a build in jenkins to > > build the JAR? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> John > >> >>>> > >> >>> > >> > >> > > > -- Daniel Cunha https://twitter.com/dvlc_ http://www.tomitribe.com http://www.tomitribe.io
