Pull Request for incubator-openwhisk-utilities
OpenWhisk devs, I created a new pull request for incubator-openwhisk-utilities to include .cs files and ignore obj directories (binaries and code gen for dotnet builds). https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-utilities/pull/51 Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks!!Shawn
Re: Instruction documented to release openwhisk projects under apache
Thank you, Bertrand. The page has been updated. Best wishes. Vincent Hou (侯胜博) Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: s...@us.ibm.com, Phone: +1(919)254-7182 Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States -Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: - To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org From: Bertrand Delacretaz Date: 10/09/2018 08:01AM Subject: Re: Instruction documented to release openwhisk projects under apache Hi, (replying to dev@ only, no need for a private conversation here) On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 9:49 PM Vincent S Hou wrote: > ...I have documented the instruction to release openwhisk module under Apache > as release manager at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/How+to+release+OpenWhisk+under+Apache+as+incubator+project > .. thank you! I have one comment on the voting, there are no vetoes in Apache release votes, as per https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html vetoes only apply to code changes. So I suggest changing the "Go through the voting process" section to say *** ...both parties to pass the vote, as per https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html * the vote email needs to be open for at least 72 hours; * at least 3 positive votes are received from the binding members, which means PPMC members in OpenWhisk community and IPMC members in Apache; * there are more positive than negative binding votes; * once at least 72 hours have passed, the vote is tallied in a [VOTE][RESULT] message. *** I don't seem to have karma to make those changes myself on that wiki page. Of course, negative votes should be taken into account if possible, even if non-binding. But that's not a formal requirement - we think it's more important for the project to be able to move forward if that's what a majority of voters wants. -Bertrand
Re: dotnet 2.1 Runtime for OpenWhisk
This will be an excellent addition to the platform - well done Shawn. I've had lots of people ask me about this in the past! On Wed, 10 Oct 2018 at 21:31, Carlos Santana wrote: > Thanks Alex looking forward for your help > > You can give what Shawn has in the README > > > -- Carlos > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 3:51 PM Alex Hitchins > wrote: > > > Hi, I have a good amount of .net experience but not so much with > > openwhisk, although I am interested in the project. If anyone has an > idiots > > guide to it I’ll give it a go! > > > > > On 10 Oct 2018, at 20:40, Carlos Santana wrote: > > > > > > +1 > > > Shawn this is awesome and great demo today > > > > > > I will create a github repo for the runtime, and then you can submit a > PR > > > to it. > > > > > > You already have an ICLA so should be ready to go. > > > > > > If other contributors have background in .NET programming please let us > > > know, it would be good for other to try it out and give feedback > > > > > > -- Carlos > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 1:55 PM Shawn Black > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Howdy, all! > > >> I would like to contribute the code for the .NET 2.1 runtime that I > had > > >> demoed earlier today during the 2018-10-10 Apache OpenWhisk Tech > > >> Interchange meeting. > > >> The current GitHub repo is: > > >> https://github.com/shawnallen85/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet > > >> Thanks!!Shawn > > > > > -- Regards, James Thomas
