Adding CosmosDB Cache Invalidation Service (#4314)

[Chetan Mehrotra]

Hi Team,

PR #4314 which adds a new service for invalidating cache when running
with CosmosDB is now reviewed. I plan to merge this tomorrow unless
any other aspect need to be addressed.

Chetan Mehrotra
[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4314

Re: Video+notes posted from today's tech. int. call

[Rodric Rabbah]

Thanks Matt for the notes. Sorry I couldn’t make it today.

I’ll go through the repo list from Dave and Chetan for my suggested list of 
repos to retire. I’ll do that tomorrow.

-r

> On Jul 24, 2019, at 1:13 PM, Matt Rutkowski  wrote:
> 
> First post-grad. meeting!
> 
> video: https://youtu.be/x_MtqtYyLQw
> notes: 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/2019-07-24+OW+Tech+Interchange+-+Meeting+Notes
> 
> Chetan kindly agreed to host the next call sched. for Aug. 7th

Re: stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

[Matt Rutkowski]

Headers to full...
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4568

On 2019/07/24 15:04:33, "David P Grove"  wrote: 
> 
> 
> I just merged [1] which enforces the stricter license header conventions in
> scancode (only use full header, not minified) that we discussed on the dev
> list about a month ago.   Matt has gone through a large number of repos and
> updated all the license headers, so hopefully we are ready for the stricter
> rules.
> 
> --dave
> 
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-utilities/pull/65
> 

Re: Openwhisk prewar containers

[Tyson Norris]

Hi Adam - 
Currently there is no support for prewarming blackbox containers. If you need 
prewarm support, you can add them to the runtimes manifest configured in your 
deployment, define prewarm configs for each there, and reference them from 
actions using "--kind ".

Best
Tyson

On 7/24/19, 11:10 AM, "Adam Versano"  wrote:

Hi,

I’m running Openwhisk on rancher for my production env.
I'm using kubernetes factory
My actions are written in go and compiled, so they are of kind blackbox.

Is there any way I can prewarm this actions?

Thanks


[SigmaDots logo]

[Youtube 
link]
 [Linkedin link] 


Adam Versano
Software developer

T:   M:+972(50)8995-119
E: ada...@sigmadots.com | 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=www.SigmaDots.comdata=02%7C01%7Ctnorris%40adobe.com%7C3f6af330b59c421b3c1b08d71062344e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636995886286496366sdata=nu5RYqFa1md%2FtWo7Pq5Po1iAsu81i1wzA8XJIbyfbDE%3Dreserved=0

Part of Essence-grp


·

This email and its attached content (if any) are private and confidential.
Click here to read the full 
disclaimer.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.


·

Openwhisk prewar containers

[Adam Versano]

Hi,

I’m running Openwhisk on rancher for my production env.
I'm using kubernetes factory
My actions are written in go and compiled, so they are of kind blackbox.

Is there any way I can prewarm this actions?

Thanks


[SigmaDots logo]

[Youtube link] 
[Linkedin link] 


Adam Versano
Software developer

T:   M:+972(50)8995-119
E: ada...@sigmadots.com | 
www.SigmaDots.com

Part of Essence-grp

·

This email and its attached content (if any) are private and confidential.
Click here to read the full 
disclaimer.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.

·

reason parameter for wskadmin tool

[Steffen Rost]

I would like to propose the possibility to store in addition the reason 
for setting a certain limit using the wskadmin tool. This will help others 
to understand why limits are stored for a certain namespace when 
revisiting them.

I already opened a pull request to add a single limit parameter to the 
wskadmin tool [1]. This PR also discuss the implementation of a more 
sophisticated audit log. Please check the PR for details.

Please let me know what you think.

[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4564



Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards
Steffen Rost
--
IBM Cloud Functions Development
Phone +49-7031-16-4841 (Fax: -3545)
E-Mail: sr...@de.ibm.com
--
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann -- Geschäftsführung: 
Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, 
HRB 243294

RE: stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

[Matt Rutkowski]

I have a stricter config ready to go in a local branch... can remove 
"tests" and other exclusions (but it will have more impacts am sure).

Kind regards,
Matt




From:   Rodric Rabbah 
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
Date:   07/24/2019 10:31 AM
Subject:[EXTERNAL] Re: stricter scancode: now rejecting minified 
license headers



The scancode configuration is excluding the tests/data/actions directory.
Since we're not bundling tests in the releases, I suppose that was OK in
the past. But we should be including tests, and in any case we should
remove this exclusion and review the scan code exclusions to make sure
they're not too loose.

# Exclude from incubator-openwhisk


# Jenkins/test generated reports


# Test data.


# Generated binary artifacts


tests/build/reports
tests/dat/actions
docs/images
bin



On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:25 AM Rodric Rabbah  wrote:

> We've got a gap somewhere.
>
> 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dopenwhisk_blob_master_tests_dat_actions_argsPrint.js=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=6zQLM7Gc0Sv1iwayKOKa4_SFxRIxS478q2gZlAJj4Zw=Sbnkas1JnvA9FulU7yjaXsyVZ7SjCTmsdXtpqXu5PyA=NDdGKptuO67qQq4mh9-nVT47cDgGtRtq1rOoTV_5cww=
 

> and several other js files in the tests use the short license.
>
> -r
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:04 AM David P Grove  
wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I just merged [1] which enforces the stricter license header 
conventions
>> in
>> scancode (only use full header, not minified) that we discussed on the 
dev
>> list about a month ago.   Matt has gone through a large number of repos
>> and
>> updated all the license headers, so hopefully we are ready for the
>> stricter
>> rules.
>>
>> --dave
>>
>> [1] 
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dopenwhisk-2Dutilities_pull_65=DwIBaQ=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg=6zQLM7Gc0Sv1iwayKOKa4_SFxRIxS478q2gZlAJj4Zw=Sbnkas1JnvA9FulU7yjaXsyVZ7SjCTmsdXtpqXu5PyA=r4z3anoMuZhkKKSgaZNGDj3EyQhjC1JglyXLJt5ayPE=
 

>>
>

Video+notes posted from today's tech. int. call

[Matt Rutkowski]

First post-grad. meeting!

video: https://youtu.be/x_MtqtYyLQw
notes: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OPENWHISK/2019-07-24+OW+Tech+Interchange+-+Meeting+Notes

Chetan kindly agreed to host the next call sched. for Aug. 7th

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache OpenWhisk Client JS Release v3.20.0

[James Thomas]

Definitely - looking back at the thread[1], these were the issues raised:

- A large number of .js files in the test directory and many other
places don’t have the correct ASF header.
- the LICENSE incorrectly includes "Copyright 2015-2016 IBM
Corporation” in the appendix
- Info in package.json needs updating as it refers to the pre ASF project

These have all been resolved since that release (with a final license
issue caught by Dave's updated scancode):
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/pull/187

[1] - https://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg67643.html

On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 at 17:16, Rodric Rabbah  wrote:
>
> This will be the first release post graduation. I’d like to make sure we’ve 
> gone through and closed issues raised in previous incubator votes.
>
> -r
>
> > On Jul 22, 2019, at 12:10 PM, James Thomas  wrote:
> >
> > I've finished up the remaining backlog items planned for the next
> > release (v3.20.0) of the Apache OpenWhisk Client JS SDK. Does anything
> > have anything else to add in before I start cutting the first RC?
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/milestone/1?closed=1
> >
> > This new release fixes a number of issues regarding correct license
> > files raised in the last release[1], resolves the accidental increase
> > in package size (and adds a CI check to prevent this happening
> > again)[2], updates all project deps to recent versions[3] and fixes
> > some minor issues.
> >
> >
> > [1] - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/162
> > [2 - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/158
> > & https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/159
> > [3] - https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-client-js/issues/177
> > --
> > Regards,
> > James Thomas



-- 
Regards,
James Thomas

Re: add reason parameter for wskadmin tool

[Rodric Rabbah]

Thanks Steffen for adding this feature. I agree it's useful.

Could you add a test for the change?

In terms of divergence between wskadmin and wskadmin-next, I propose that
we separately deprecate wskadmin and all new features are added to
wskadmin-next.

-r


On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 6:28 AM Steffen Rost  wrote:

> I would like to propose the possibility to store in addition the reason
> for setting a certain limit using the wskadmin tool. This will help others
> to understand why limits are stored for a certain namespace when
> revisiting them.
>
> I already opened a pull request to add a single limit parameter to the
> wskadmin tool [1]. This PR also discuss the implementation of a more
> sophisticated audit log. Please check the PR for details.
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4564
>
>
>
> Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards
> Steffen Rost
>
> --
> IBM Cloud Functions Development
> Phone +49-7031-16-4841 (Fax: -3545)
> E-Mail: sr...@de.ibm.com
>
> --
> IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann -- Geschäftsführung:
> Dirk Wittkopp
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart,
> HRB 243294
>
>

Re: stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

[Rodric Rabbah]

The scancode configuration is excluding the tests/data/actions directory.
Since we're not bundling tests in the releases, I suppose that was OK in
the past. But we should be including tests, and in any case we should
remove this exclusion and review the scan code exclusions to make sure
they're not too loose.

# Exclude from incubator-openwhisk


# Jenkins/test generated reports


# Test data.


# Generated binary artifacts


tests/build/reports
tests/dat/actions
docs/images
bin



On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:25 AM Rodric Rabbah  wrote:

> We've got a gap somewhere.
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/blob/master/tests/dat/actions/argsPrint.js
> and several other js files in the tests use the short license.
>
> -r
>
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:04 AM David P Grove  wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I just merged [1] which enforces the stricter license header conventions
>> in
>> scancode (only use full header, not minified) that we discussed on the dev
>> list about a month ago.   Matt has gone through a large number of repos
>> and
>> updated all the license headers, so hopefully we are ready for the
>> stricter
>> rules.
>>
>> --dave
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-utilities/pull/65
>>
>

Re: stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

[Rodric Rabbah]

We've got a gap somewhere.
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/blob/master/tests/dat/actions/argsPrint.js
and several other js files in the tests use the short license.

-r

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 11:04 AM David P Grove  wrote:

>
>
> I just merged [1] which enforces the stricter license header conventions in
> scancode (only use full header, not minified) that we discussed on the dev
> list about a month ago.   Matt has gone through a large number of repos and
> updated all the license headers, so hopefully we are ready for the stricter
> rules.
>
> --dave
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-utilities/pull/65
>

stricter scancode: now rejecting minified license headers

[David P Grove]

I just merged [1] which enforces the stricter license header conventions in
scancode (only use full header, not minified) that we discussed on the dev
list about a month ago.   Matt has gone through a large number of repos and
updated all the license headers, so hopefully we are ready for the stricter
rules.

--dave

[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-utilities/pull/65

Re: Agenda for Tech. Int. call today

[Sven Lange-Last]

Hello Matt,

sorry, I won't be able to participate today. I'm planning to participate 
more frequently in future.



Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards,

Sven Lange-Last
Senior Software Engineer
IBM Cloud Functions
Apache OpenWhisk


E-mail: sven.lange-l...@de.ibm.com
Find me on:  


Schoenaicher Str. 220
Boeblingen, 71032
Germany




IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, 
HRB 243294

Agenda for Tech. Int. call today

[Matt Rutkowski]

Any more topics?

Scanning PR and dev lists here are the topics I gleaned:

* PR review (e.g., Rodric/Carlos//Tyson, etc.)
* [Scheduler] Initial commit for Scheduler #4547 (Dom)
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4547
* TBD
* Add option for appending runtimes registry to user provided images #4503 
(duynguyen)
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4503
* TBD
* Close the consumer when WakeupExcpetion happened #4459
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4459
* Merge?
* TBD
* Delete pod when creating timeout #4424
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4424
* Merge?
* TBD
* Change prewarm container #4225
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4225
* Needs rebase/conflicts fixed...
* TBD
* Dev List
* Housecleaning of Git repos. (Dave)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f490294036f0e2ae8536966c2f2e8f8e7986646b487753cc467c89a4@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* remove “incubator-“; can we deprecate any before?
* TBD
* Apache OW client release (James)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b67abc6a090ff888588865fe59063699ef0aa10b6f6bd8841267ce90@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* TBD
* OW Invoker overloads - “Resched. run” (Sven)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6f0a809584f4bfe712669550ffd99a129202e146235e7c0f75595cd6@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* TBD
* A direction to take in a new component, "the scheduler” (Dom)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c67a883f893fab8a40ed34b78696451ad5bc55dee693618a3013c460@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* TBD
* Updating our contributions guide (Rodric)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/27cc7bb9449d3b87e4fc6353455eaae4e1b9d200c923d4f26e74ee77@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* TBD
* Openwhisk in a standalone runnable jar (#4516) (Chetan)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5d207a2cef5b6b3b79695633d0206d94fee0c08aa09c746826e0610f@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* Impacts on website, OW README “getting started”?
* Any update?

Re: [REMINDER] Technical Interchange Call TOMORROW! submit topics!

[Matt Rutkowski]

Topics anyone?

scanning PR and dev lists here are the topics I gleaned:

* PR review (e.g., Rodric/Carlos//Tyson, etc.)
* [Scheduler] Initial commit for Scheduler #4547 (Dom)
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4547
* TBD
* Add option for appending runtimes registry to user provided images #4503 
(duynguyen)
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4503
* TBD
* Close the consumer when WakeupExcpetion happened #4459
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4459
* Merge?
* TBD
* Delete pod when creating timeout #4424
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4424
* Merge?
* TBD
* Change prewarm container #4225
* https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4225
* Needs rebase/conflicts fixed...
* TBD
* Dev List
* Housecleaning of Git repos. (Dave)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/f490294036f0e2ae8536966c2f2e8f8e7986646b487753cc467c89a4@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* remove “incubator-“; can we deprecate any before?
* TBD
* Apache OW client release (James)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/b67abc6a090ff888588865fe59063699ef0aa10b6f6bd8841267ce90@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* TBD
* OW Invoker overloads - “Resched. run” (Sven)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/6f0a809584f4bfe712669550ffd99a129202e146235e7c0f75595cd6@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* TBD
* A direction to take in a new component, "the scheduler” (Dom)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/c67a883f893fab8a40ed34b78696451ad5bc55dee693618a3013c460@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* TBD
* Updating our contributions guide (Rodric)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/27cc7bb9449d3b87e4fc6353455eaae4e1b9d200c923d4f26e74ee77@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* TBD
* Openwhisk in a standalone runnable jar (#4516) (Chetan)
* 
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5d207a2cef5b6b3b79695633d0206d94fee0c08aa09c746826e0610f@%3Cdev.openwhisk.apache.org%3E
* Impacts on website, OW README “getting started”?
* Any update?

On 2019/07/23 16:31:33, "Matt Rutkowski"  wrote: 
> Web Meeting: Tech Interchange (bi-weekly): 
> Day-Time: Wednesdays, 11AM EDT (Eastern US), 5PM CEST (Central Europe), 
> 3PM GMT, 11PM (midnight)(Beijing)
> Zoom: https://zoom.us/my/asfopenwhisk
> Google Calendar (click entry to add): 
> https://calendar.google.com/event?action=TEMPLATE=MnU2dHNiMjc0bTRoc29ydjBscW05Ym1jNmhfMjAxOTA5MDRUMTUwMDAwWiBhcGFjaGVvcGVud2hpc2tAbQ=apacheopenwhisk%40gmail.com=ALL
> 
> 

add reason parameter for wskadmin tool

[Steffen Rost]

I would like to propose the possibility to store in addition the reason 
for setting a certain limit using the wskadmin tool. This will help others 
to understand why limits are stored for a certain namespace when 
revisiting them.

I already opened a pull request to add a single limit parameter to the 
wskadmin tool [1]. This PR also discuss the implementation of a more 
sophisticated audit log. Please check the PR for details.

Please let me know what you think.

[1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk/pull/4564



Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Kind regards
Steffen Rost
--
IBM Cloud Functions Development
Phone +49-7031-16-4841 (Fax: -3545)
E-Mail: sr...@de.ibm.com
--
IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Matthias Hartmann -- Geschäftsführung: 
Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, 
HRB 243294

[slack-digest] [2019-07-23] #website

[OpenWhisk Team Slack]

2019-07-23 14:27:59 UTC - Dave Grove: Thanks for the report; submitted a PR to 
remove the link (was leftover from before Kubernetes was available in stable 
Docker for Mac/Windows)
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C9J8P2CQ1/p1563892079001800?thread_ts=1563839714.001200=C9J8P2CQ1

2019-07-23 17:42:44 UTC - Harinder Singh Bedi: Great, thanks
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C9J8P2CQ1/p1563903764002000?thread_ts=1563839714.001200=C9J8P2CQ1

[slack-digest] [2019-07-23] #general

[OpenWhisk Team Slack]

2019-07-23 03:05:42 UTC - chris: @Satwik Kolhe sorry i can't totally understand 
what you say :disappointed_relieved:
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563851142087900?thread_ts=1563774675.008600=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 03:13:24 UTC - chris: @Satwik Kolhe is it possible that since i run 
`virtualenv` and `pip install pyjokes` are under jupyter container.

After then, i ssh to server run `zip` and `wsk` outside. because it is 
installed on the virtualenv in the jupyter container  I also run `pip list` 
which doesn't show pyjokes so that it cause the error that `no module named 
pyjokes` 
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563851604088200?thread_ts=1563774675.008600=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 07:36:38 UTC - Adam Varsano: Hi all,
wave : Rodric Rabbah
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563867398088700?thread_ts=1563867398.088700=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 08:06:07 UTC - chris: Guys i am going crazy... Staying here for many 
hours
Even i follow this article to do step by step  


it still shows `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pyjokes'`
Someone knows how to do to solve it.?:sob::sob: <#C3U24FJ1E|python> 
#ModuleNotFoundError #virtualenv
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563869167093300

2019-07-23 08:40:45 UTC - James Thomas: @chris hey chris (author here) - sorry 
you are having issues!
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563871245094300

2019-07-23 08:41:01 UTC - James Thomas: What errors messages/logs are you 
getting?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563871261094800?thread_ts=1563871261.094800=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 08:45:02 UTC - James Thomas: hey adam - you might want to open an 
issue on the kube repo or post in <#C4J3R7JFL|kubernetes>
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563871502095100?thread_ts=1563867398.088700=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 08:53:53 UTC - chris: Dear @James Thomas
I really study your article very seriously.
I try it again and again. But it still not work for me
The article is really detailed

The error logs are shown in the following :
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563872033095300?thread_ts=1563871261.094800=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 08:54:24 UTC - James Thomas: can you send me the zip file you are 
using to deploy?
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563872064095700?thread_ts=1563871261.094800=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 08:57:08 UTC - chris: OK!! I already send to you in the direct 
message
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563872228095900?thread_ts=1563871261.094800=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 09:12:53 UTC - Jiang PengCheng: I met the same problem when I use 
host to install package `pyjokes`, but after tried to install the package via 
docker as the article said: `docker run --rm -v "$PWD:/tmp" 
openwhisk/python3action sh \
  -c "cd tmp; virtualenv virtualenv; source virtualenv/bin/activate; pip 
install pyjokes;"`, it works as expected
+1 : James Thomas, chris, Dominic Kim
heart_eyes : chris
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563873173096100?thread_ts=1563871261.094800=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 09:22:46 UTC - chris: @Jiang PengCheng OK! thanks i will give it a 
try!!! by using docker
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563873766096400?thread_ts=1563871261.094800=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 09:40:50 UTC - chris: OH MY GOD It work!!!
clap : James Thomas
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563874850096600?thread_ts=1563871261.094800=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 09:41:19 UTC - chris: @Jiang PengCheng @James Thomas Thank you so so 
so much!!!
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563874879097000?thread_ts=1563871261.094800=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 09:58:07 UTC - James Thomas: enjoy!
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563875887097500?thread_ts=1563871261.094800=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 14:29:48 UTC - Michael Schmidt: hi @Adam Varsano
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563892188098600?thread_ts=1563867398.088700=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 15:28:39 UTC - Adam Varsano: Hi,

How can I prewarm actions?
I'm using kubernetes factory
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563895719099200?thread_ts=1563895719.099200=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 15:30:20 UTC - chetanm: Most likely by adding stem cell in 
runtimes.json should work
https://openwhisk-team.slack.com/archives/C3TPCAQG1/p1563895820099300?thread_ts=1563895719.099200=C3TPCAQG1

2019-07-23 15:30:23 UTC - chetanm: ```{
"kind": "nodejs:10",
"default": true,
"image": {
"prefix": "openwhisk",
"name": "action-nodejs-v10",
"tag": "nightly"
},
"deprecated": false,
"attached": 

Re: housecleaning of openwhisk git repos

[Chetan Mehrotra]

Below is the list if repo with last pushed date from which we can
decide what we can keep and what can be archived. Probably repo which
have not been updated after 2017 can be archived for now

1 | incubator-openwhisk| 2019-07-24
2 | incubator-openwhisk-website| 2019-07-23
3 | incubator-openwhisk-cli| 2019-07-22
4 | incubator-openwhisk-runtime-swift  | 2019-07-22
5 | incubator-openwhisk-runtime-go | 2019-07-20
6 | incubator-openwhisk-runtime-nodejs | 2019-07-18
7 | incubator-openwhisk-runtime-rust   | 2019-07-18
8 | incubator-openwhisk-deploy-kube| 2019-07-18
9 | incubator-openwhisk-client-js  | 2019-07-16
10| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-python | 2019-07-12
11| incubator-openwhisk-devtools   | 2019-07-11
12| incubator-openwhisk-utilities  | 2019-07-10
13| incubator-openwhisk-release| 2019-07-09
14| incubator-openwhisk-catalog| 2019-07-08
15| incubator-openwhisk-wskdeploy  | 2019-07-05
16| incubator-openwhisk-composer   | 2019-07-04
17| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-php| 2019-07-03
18| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-java   | 2019-07-03
19| incubator-openwhisk-apigateway | 2019-07-01
20| incubator-openwhisk-package-alarms | 2019-06-29
21| incubator-openwhisk-package-cloudant   | 2019-06-29
22| incubator-openwhisk-package-kafka  | 2019-06-29
23| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-ballerina  | 2019-06-29
24| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-dotnet | 2019-06-29
25| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-ruby   | 2019-06-29
26| incubator-openwhisk-runtime-docker | 2019-06-29
27| incubator-openwhisk-client-go  | 2019-06-29
28| incubator-openwhisk-pluggable-provider | 2019-06-24
29| incubator-openwhisk-test   | 2019-05-31
30| incubator-openwhisk-deploy-openshift   | 2019-05-20
31| incubator-openwhisk-composer-python| 2019-03-20
32| incubator-openwhisk-external-resources | 2019-02-10
33| incubator-openwhisk-workshop   | 2019-01-24
34| incubator-openwhisk-package-pushnotifications  | 2019-01-08
35| incubator-openwhisk-package-deploy | 2018-11-07
36| incubator-openwhisk-tutorial   | 2018-07-30
37| incubator-openwhisk-client-swift   | 2018-05-09
38| incubator-openwhisk-deploy-mesos   | 2018-04-16

39| incubator-openwhisk-slackinvite| 2017-12-29
40| incubator-openwhisk-vscode | 2017-11-03
41| incubator-openwhisk-package-rss| 2017-09-27
42| incubator-openwhisk-xcode  | 2017-08-21
43| incubator-openwhisk-package-template   | 2017-08-17
44| incubator-openwhisk-debugger   | 2017-07-20
45| incubator-openwhisk-sample-matos   | 2017-07-14
46| incubator-openwhisk-playground | 2017-07-12
47| incubator-openwhisk-podspecs   | 2017-07-12
48| incubator-openwhisk-client-python  | 2017-07-10
49| incubator-openwhisk-package-jira   | 2017-07-10
50| incubator-openwhisk-selfserve-test | 2017-06-26
51| incubator-openwhisk-GitHubSlackBot | 2017-03-16
52| incubator-openwhisk-sample-slackbot| 2017-01-25

Chetan Mehrotra

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 3:45 AM David P Grove  wrote:
>
>
> Before we request infra to rename our gitrepos (to remove incubator-), we
> should probably go through the list of our 52 repos and identify those that
> should instead be archived as obsolete.
>
> Anyone want to take a first cut at making a proposed list of repos to be
> archived?
>
> --dave