Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Just noticed this was the wrong thread ;-) Daffodil is now generally history but I didn't delete the protocol modules I haven't migrated yet as I wanted to translate the KNXNet/IP definitions I had created to the new format before deleting the dfdl schemas. Chris Am 26.06.19, 08:27 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Also Done :-) At first I had moved the java template into the plc4j module, but noticed that we were thinking of making plc4py, plc4cpp and plc4net use their own build systems internally, so keeping the structure would be a challenge, so we'll simply add all templates to the plc4x root build-utils directory. Chris Am 25.06.19, 23:15 schrieb "Tim Mitsch" : Sorry for late response, quite busy on a fair. But also +1 from me Best Tim Am 25.06.19, 10:08 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Oh wow ... that was a quick one ... I think I'll just do it right away. Thanks for the ultra-quick responses Chris Am 25.06.19, 10:05 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step. Julian Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" : +1 Freundliche Grüße Markus Sommer Geschäftsführer isb innovative software businesses GmbH Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2 D - 88046 Friedrichshafen Tel.:+49 (0) 7541 3834-14 Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437 Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20 E-Mail: som...@isb-fn.de Web: www.isb-fn.de Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler Sitz: Friedrichshafen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624 Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Also Done :-) At first I had moved the java template into the plc4j module, but noticed that we were thinking of making plc4py, plc4cpp and plc4net use their own build systems internally, so keeping the structure would be a challenge, so we'll simply add all templates to the plc4x root build-utils directory. Chris Am 25.06.19, 23:15 schrieb "Tim Mitsch" : Sorry for late response, quite busy on a fair. But also +1 from me Best Tim Am 25.06.19, 10:08 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Oh wow ... that was a quick one ... I think I'll just do it right away. Thanks for the ultra-quick responses Chris Am 25.06.19, 10:05 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step. Julian Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" : +1 Freundliche Grüße Markus Sommer Geschäftsführer isb innovative software businesses GmbH Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2 D - 88046 Friedrichshafen Tel.:+49 (0) 7541 3834-14 Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437 Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20 E-Mail: som...@isb-fn.de Web: www.isb-fn.de Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler Sitz: Friedrichshafen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624 Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Sorry for late response, quite busy on a fair. But also +1 from me Best Tim Am 25.06.19, 10:08 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Oh wow ... that was a quick one ... I think I'll just do it right away. Thanks for the ultra-quick responses Chris Am 25.06.19, 10:05 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step. Julian Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" : +1 Freundliche Grüße Markus Sommer Geschäftsführer isb innovative software businesses GmbH Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2 D - 88046 Friedrichshafen Tel.:+49 (0) 7541 3834-14 Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437 Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20 E-Mail: som...@isb-fn.de Web: www.isb-fn.de Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler Sitz: Friedrichshafen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624 Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
RE: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
+1 😊 Matthias Strljic, M.Sc. Universität Stuttgart Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW) Seidenstraße 36 70174 Stuttgart GERMANY Tel: +49 711 685-84530 Fax: +49 711 685-74530 E-Mail: matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de -Original Message- From: Christofer Dutz Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2019 9:42 AM To: dev@plc4x.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
[BUILD-STABLE]: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [404]'
BUILD-STABLE: Job 'PLC4X/PLC4X/develop [develop] [404]': Is back to normal.
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Oh wow ... that was a quick one ... I think I'll just do it right away. Thanks for the ultra-quick responses Chris Am 25.06.19, 10:05 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step. Julian Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" : +1 Freundliche Grüße Markus Sommer Geschäftsführer isb innovative software businesses GmbH Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2 D - 88046 Friedrichshafen Tel.:+49 (0) 7541 3834-14 Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437 Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20 E-Mail: som...@isb-fn.de Web: www.isb-fn.de Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler Sitz: Friedrichshafen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624 Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi, I agree and I think its important to tag it as it really was an intersting step. Julian Am 25.06.19, 09:57 schrieb "Markus Sommer" : +1 Freundliche Grüße Markus Sommer Geschäftsführer isb innovative software businesses GmbH Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2 D - 88046 Friedrichshafen Tel.:+49 (0) 7541 3834-14 Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437 Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20 E-Mail: som...@isb-fn.de Web: www.isb-fn.de Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler Sitz: Friedrichshafen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624 Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
AW: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
+1 Freundliche Grüße Markus Sommer Geschäftsführer isb innovative software businesses GmbH Otto-Lilienthal-Strasse 2 D - 88046 Friedrichshafen Tel.: +49 (0) 7541 3834-14 Mob: +49 (0) 171 537 8437 Fax: +49 (0) 7541 3834-20 E-Mail: som...@isb-fn.de Web: www.isb-fn.de Geschäftsführer: Markus Sommer, Thomas Zeler Sitz: Friedrichshafen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Ulm HRB-Nr. 631624 Important Note: This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain trade secrets and may well also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received it in error, you are on notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete his e-mail and any attachment from your system. If you are not the intended recipient please understand that you must not copy this e-mail or any attachments or disclose the contents to any other person. Thank you. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
AW: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
+1 cleaning up is always good Björn -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Christofer Dutz Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juni 2019 09:42 An: dev@plc4x.apache.org Betreff: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML? Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
+1 sure go for it Sebastian > Am 25.06.2019 um 09:42 schrieb Christofer Dutz : > > Hi all, > > I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. > For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. > > We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept > and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. > > I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. > > What do you think? > > Chris >
[DISCUSS] Retire Daffodil and SCXML?
Hi all, I would like to start to move the new code generation outside the sandbox. For this I would like to replace the existing code-generation modules. We currently have the dynamic driver modules, which were a proof of concept and have proven to be technically interesting, but performance-wise dead ends. I would like to tag the revision with “last-dafodil” and get rid of them. What do you think? Chris
Re: [DISCUSS] [CodeGen] Move the core generator modules to a separate git repo
Ok, so the split is done :-) Unfortunately I noticed the filter did filter out the commit history for the stuff, but only the part since I moved it to its final destination. But as I think I wrote all of that code anyway there's no problem with matching who wrote which line of code. And if someone's interested in the complete history, that's in the main plc4x repo anyway. Chris Am 24.06.19, 17:46 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi all, so I just had infra create the new repo. Tomorrow I'll try to import the subdirectory of the plc4x-git into the new repo so we keep the history. Chris Am 24.06.19, 11:38 schrieb "Strljic, Matthias Milan" : Hi Chris, so i am not that creative 😃 and the name sounds quite functional ! 😊 +1 Greetings Matthias Strljic, M.Sc. Universität Stuttgart Institut für Steuerungstechnik der Werkzeugmaschinen und Fertigungseinrichtungen (ISW) Seidenstraße 36 70174 Stuttgart GERMANY Tel: +49 711 685-84530 Fax: +49 711 685-74530 E-Mail: matthias.strl...@isw.uni-stuttgart.de Web: http://www.isw.uni-stuttgart.de -Original Message- From: Christofer Dutz Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 8:54 PM To: dev@plc4x.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] [CodeGen] Move the core generator modules to a separate git repo Hi all. So I have split up the parts of the code generator, that need to be external to a separate build in the project. We had discussed that we should move it outside as soon as we se it fit. I think it’s in such a state now. So what do you think? Should we create a „plc4x-build-tools” git repo? (Or any other name) I think it would be good to do so and release those modules pretty soon. Chris
