Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars
+1 -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars
Although I think that in the long-term we should go away from maintaining another apache project, I don't have a better plan for the mid-term ... so +1. I also think, that the svn + history approach is better than keeping it under POI root. Even if we don't bring XmlBeans uptodate with annotations and other bling stuff, the community can benefit from various existing and upcoming bugfixes. On 3/7/18 7:18 PM, Greg Woolsey wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:03 AM Mark Murphywrote: > >> +1 >> >> >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Dave Fisher >> wrote: >> >>> Hi - >>> >>> Let’s get back on track. >>> >>> We want to release XMLBeans 2.7.0 with the org.apache.xmlbeans namespace >>> for the benefit of all of the users who are dependent on it. If POI does >>> not want to do this then XMLBeans will need to go to the Incubator. >>> >>> Should we VOTE? >>> >>> If yes then we can ask Infra to open the JIRA and move the svn somewhere >>> with the history. We also ask for the return of the website to our LDAP. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> On Mar 7, 2018, at 4:04 AM, Murphy, Mark >>> wrote: If we do that, it needs to be in a major release because namespaces >>> change. If we are going to repackage to support Java 9 modules, that >> should >>> also happen at the same time. -Original Message- From: pj.fanning [mailto:fannin...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 4:35 PM To: dev@poi.apache.org Subject: Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars I have an experimental xmlbeans jar where I changed the package name to >>> org.apache.poi.xmlbeans just to see if it was feasible to get it build. I >>> also have a poi branch that successfully uses this jar. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/pjfanning/ >>> xmlbeans/2.7.0-beta1/ It should be feasible to use a commons based package name if that was >>> the route we went. -- Sent from: >> http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html >>> >>> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars
+1 On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 10:03 AM Mark Murphywrote: > +1 > > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Dave Fisher > wrote: > > > Hi - > > > > Let’s get back on track. > > > > We want to release XMLBeans 2.7.0 with the org.apache.xmlbeans namespace > > for the benefit of all of the users who are dependent on it. If POI does > > not want to do this then XMLBeans will need to go to the Incubator. > > > > Should we VOTE? > > > > If yes then we can ask Infra to open the JIRA and move the svn somewhere > > with the history. We also ask for the return of the website to our LDAP. > > > > Regards, > > Dave > > > > > On Mar 7, 2018, at 4:04 AM, Murphy, Mark > > wrote: > > > > > > If we do that, it needs to be in a major release because namespaces > > change. If we are going to repackage to support Java 9 modules, that > should > > also happen at the same time. > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: pj.fanning [mailto:fannin...@yahoo.com] > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 4:35 PM > > > To: dev@poi.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars > > > > > > I have an experimental xmlbeans jar where I changed the package name to > > org.apache.poi.xmlbeans just to see if it was feasible to get it build. I > > also have a poi branch that successfully uses this jar. > > > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/pjfanning/ > > xmlbeans/2.7.0-beta1/ > > > It should be feasible to use a commons based package name if that was > > the route we went. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Sent from: > http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional > > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > > > > > > > > > - > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > > > > > > > >
Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars
Hi - Let’s get back on track. We want to release XMLBeans 2.7.0 with the org.apache.xmlbeans namespace for the benefit of all of the users who are dependent on it. If POI does not want to do this then XMLBeans will need to go to the Incubator. Should we VOTE? If yes then we can ask Infra to open the JIRA and move the svn somewhere with the history. We also ask for the return of the website to our LDAP. Regards, Dave > On Mar 7, 2018, at 4:04 AM, Murphy, Markwrote: > > If we do that, it needs to be in a major release because namespaces change. > If we are going to repackage to support Java 9 modules, that should also > happen at the same time. > > -Original Message- > From: pj.fanning [mailto:fannin...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 4:35 PM > To: dev@poi.apache.org > Subject: Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars > > I have an experimental xmlbeans jar where I changed the package name to > org.apache.poi.xmlbeans just to see if it was feasible to get it build. I > also have a poi branch that successfully uses this jar. > https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/pjfanning/xmlbeans/2.7.0-beta1/ > It should be feasible to use a commons based package name if that was the > route we went. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional > commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
RE: publishing poi xmlbeans jars
If we do that, it needs to be in a major release because namespaces change. If we are going to repackage to support Java 9 modules, that should also happen at the same time. -Original Message- From: pj.fanning [mailto:fannin...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 4:35 PM To: dev@poi.apache.org Subject: Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars I have an experimental xmlbeans jar where I changed the package name to org.apache.poi.xmlbeans just to see if it was feasible to get it build. I also have a poi branch that successfully uses this jar. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/pjfanning/xmlbeans/2.7.0-beta1/ It should be feasible to use a commons based package name if that was the route we went. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 62162] indirect function with named range reference causes NPE
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62162 --- Comment #2 from samson--- Created attachment 35755 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35755=edit Possible solution -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 62162] indirect function with named range reference causes NPE
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62162 --- Comment #1 from samson--- Created attachment 35754 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35754=edit Unit test to replicate the issue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 62162] New: indirect function with named range reference causes NPE
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62162 Bug ID: 62162 Summary: indirect function with named range reference causes NPE Product: POI Version: 3.15-FINAL Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSSF Assignee: dev@poi.apache.org Reporter: samsontes...@tagetik.com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 35753 --> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35753=edit Sample file to replicate the problem Referring a named range in a different sheet using from an INDIRECT causes NPE. The problem seems that the “OperationEvaluationContext” is searching the name in the referee sheet (the one containing the formula) instead of the owner of the name. See the suggested patch for details. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org