Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars
There's a workaround for the GPL problem: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-264 ... but my last experiments with the current ECMA schemas weren't so successful: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46869482/ On 3/9/18 2:05 PM, Murphy, Mark wrote: > Since JAXB is being dropped from Java SE (deprecated in Java 9, removed in > Java 11), I don't think that this will be a problem. There may be other > marshallers out there, but the more immediate problem is that we need to > remove all JAXB code from POI because we can no longer rely on the JVM > implementation, and the JAXB project is GPL code. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Bug 62170] NumberFormatException when trying to get reference from named range with getRefersToFormula()
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62170 stephane.tes...@soprasteria.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS||All --- Comment #1 from stephane.tes...@soprasteria.com --- After further investigations, it seems that the problem only concerns XLS files. It works fine with XLSX files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
[Bug 62170] New: NumberFormatException when trying to get reference from named range with getRefersToFormula()
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62170 Bug ID: 62170 Summary: NumberFormatException when trying to get reference from named range with getRefersToFormula() Product: POI Version: 3.17-FINAL Hardware: PC Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: HSSF Assignee: dev@poi.apache.org Reporter: stephane.tes...@soprasteria.com Target Milestone: --- When I try to get the reference behing my named range via the getRefersToFormula() function, in some cases, I get a NumberFormatException. It depends on the sheet name where the named range is, for example : - the named range is in a sheet named '262001', it's OK. - the named range is in a sheet named 'C262001', it fails -> i don't know why but it seems POI considers that it's a number and tries to parse it into a string, thus the NumberFormatException : 262001 is higher than the int limit 2^31-1 When I check the named cells in Excel's name manager, sometimes the sheet name is surrouded with quotes, sometimes it isn't. Note that when there are quotes, it works everytime with POI. Otherwise, it fails sometimes (cf. the case mentionned before, Excel doesn't add quotes with the sheet name C262001) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
RE: publishing poi xmlbeans jars
Since JAXB is being dropped from Java SE (deprecated in Java 9, removed in Java 11), I don't think that this will be a problem. There may be other marshallers out there, but the more immediate problem is that we need to remove all JAXB code from POI because we can no longer rely on the JVM implementation, and the JAXB project is GPL code. -Original Message- From: Javen O'Neal [mailto:one...@apache.org] Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2018 9:24 PM To: POI Developers List Subject: Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars +1 sending it back to Incubator or subproject of Commons. +0.9 as a subproject of POI. Would prefer Xmlbeans to have its own PMC to make it easier for other Apache devs to make changes, but given how stable/mature it is, the support volume should be low. If/when POI does replace XMLBeans for a more memory efficient/faster XML library, it'd be awkward for our PMC to manage a product we don't use. We can move it out to incubator, attic, or put it up for adoption when that time comes. As long as the board doesn't have reservations about us subprojecting XMLBeans and then making another change in a couple years, I'm fine with taking XMLBeans as a subproject of POI. On Thu, Mar 8, 2018, 10:50 Dominik Stadler wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 11:20 PM, pj.fanning wrote: > > > +1 > > > > > > > > -- > > Sent from: > > http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html > > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org > > > > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars
+1 Je 2018-03-07 14:40, Dave Fisher skribis: Hi - Let’s get back on track. We want to release XMLBeans 2.7.0 with the org.apache.xmlbeans namespace for the benefit of all of the users who are dependent on it. If POI does not want to do this then XMLBeans will need to go to the Incubator. Should we VOTE? If yes then we can ask Infra to open the JIRA and move the svn somewhere with the history. We also ask for the return of the website to our LDAP. Regards, Dave On Mar 7, 2018, at 4:04 AM, Murphy, Mark wrote: If we do that, it needs to be in a major release because namespaces change. If we are going to repackage to support Java 9 modules, that should also happen at the same time. -Original Message- From: pj.fanning [mailto:fannin...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2018 4:35 PM To: dev@poi.apache.org Subject: Re: publishing poi xmlbeans jars I have an experimental xmlbeans jar where I changed the package name to org.apache.poi.xmlbeans just to see if it was feasible to get it build. I also have a poi branch that successfully uses this jar. https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/github/pjfanning/xmlbeans/2.7.0-beta1/ It should be feasible to use a commons based package name if that was the route we went. -- Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
