Re: Next release of POI

[Andreas Beeker]

Hi,

the ooxml-lite module is currently not filtering correctly.
I need to fix that first before continuing with preparing the release candidate.

Andi.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Next release of POI

[Andreas Beeker]

Hi,

I'm now working on the release - please stop committing.

Andi

On 01.09.21 10:14, Sayi wrote:



Hi,

a) It’s time to release a new version and the new version solves many serious 
bugs.

c) My opinion is that 5.1.0 is better.

Best regards,
Sayi














在 2021-09-01 04:28:34，"Dominik Stadler"  写道：

Similar for me,

a) good time roll the next release

b) whatever is easier right now, we can also use Ant once again if Gradle
needs a bit more work

c) I'd also opt for 5.1.0, it does not feel like big enough changes for a
major release

Dominik.


On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:08 PM Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ 
wrote:


Hi,

a) many changes deserve to be released

b) up to you to estimate the benefits or the burden

c) I don't think we introduced API breaking changes, so 5.1.0 would
encompass the logging changes

Best regards,
Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ


⁣Obter o BlueMail para Android

Em 29 de ago de 2021 21:11, em 21:11, PJ Fanning
 escreveu:

Hi Andi,

a) I think we need a new release

b) I don't think we need to solve all the build issues before the next
release

c) I'd prefer to call the next release 6.0.0 or failing that 5.1.0. The
log4j change makes calling next release 5.0.1 problematic for me.






On Sunday 29 August 2021, 18:57:42 IST, Andreas Beeker
 wrote:





Hi Devs,

a) what's your opinion about rolling the next release?


>From my side, only the distsource build is not implemented in gradle

and a few of the release task need to be done manually.

b) Now that the gradle dist plugin picks up all the dependencies, how
important is the distsource check?

c) what's our next release version? 5.0.1,  5.1 or 6.0

Andi


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Next release of POI

[Sayi]

Hi,

a) It’s time to release a new version and the new version solves many serious 
bugs.

c) My opinion is that 5.1.0 is better.

Best regards,
Sayi














在 2021-09-01 04:28:34，"Dominik Stadler"  写道：
>Similar for me,
>
>a) good time roll the next release
>
>b) whatever is easier right now, we can also use Ant once again if Gradle
>needs a bit more work
>
>c) I'd also opt for 5.1.0, it does not feel like big enough changes for a
>major release
>
>Dominik.
>
>
>On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:08 PM Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ 
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> a) many changes deserve to be released
>>
>> b) up to you to estimate the benefits or the burden
>>
>> c) I don't think we introduced API breaking changes, so 5.1.0 would
>> encompass the logging changes
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ
>>
>>
>> ⁣Obter o BlueMail para Android 
>>
>> Em 29 de ago de 2021 21:11, em 21:11, PJ Fanning
>>  escreveu:
>> >Hi Andi,
>> >
>> >a) I think we need a new release
>> >
>> >b) I don't think we need to solve all the build issues before the next
>> >release
>> >
>> >c) I'd prefer to call the next release 6.0.0 or failing that 5.1.0. The
>> >log4j change makes calling next release 5.0.1 problematic for me.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >On Sunday 29 August 2021, 18:57:42 IST, Andreas Beeker
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >Hi Devs,
>> >
>> >a) what's your opinion about rolling the next release?
>> >
>> >From my side, only the distsource build is not implemented in gradle
>> >and a few of the release task need to be done manually.
>> >
>> >b) Now that the gradle dist plugin picks up all the dependencies, how
>> >important is the distsource check?
>> >
>> >c) what's our next release version? 5.0.1,  5.1 or 6.0
>> >
>> >Andi
>> >
>> >
>> >-
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>> >-
>> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>>

Re: Next release of POI

[Dominik Stadler]

Similar for me,

a) good time roll the next release

b) whatever is easier right now, we can also use Ant once again if Gradle
needs a bit more work

c) I'd also opt for 5.1.0, it does not feel like big enough changes for a
major release

Dominik.


On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:08 PM Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> a) many changes deserve to be released
>
> b) up to you to estimate the benefits or the burden
>
> c) I don't think we introduced API breaking changes, so 5.1.0 would
> encompass the logging changes
>
> Best regards,
> Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ
>
>
> ⁣Obter o BlueMail para Android ​
>
> Em 29 de ago de 2021 21:11, em 21:11, PJ Fanning
>  escreveu:
> >Hi Andi,
> >
> >a) I think we need a new release
> >
> >b) I don't think we need to solve all the build issues before the next
> >release
> >
> >c) I'd prefer to call the next release 6.0.0 or failing that 5.1.0. The
> >log4j change makes calling next release 5.0.1 problematic for me.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On Sunday 29 August 2021, 18:57:42 IST, Andreas Beeker
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Hi Devs,
> >
> >a) what's your opinion about rolling the next release?
> >
> >From my side, only the distsource build is not implemented in gradle
> >and a few of the release task need to be done manually.
> >
> >b) Now that the gradle dist plugin picks up all the dependencies, how
> >important is the distsource check?
> >
> >c) what's our next release version? 5.0.1,  5.1 or 6.0
> >
> >Andi
> >
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
> >-
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
> >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>

Re: Next release of POI

[Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ]

Hi,

a) many changes deserve to be released

b) up to you to estimate the benefits or the burden

c) I don't think we introduced API breaking changes, so 5.1.0 would encompass 
the logging changes

Best regards,
Alain FAGOT BÉAREZ


⁣Obter o BlueMail para Android ​

Em 29 de ago de 2021 21:11, em 21:11, PJ Fanning  
escreveu:
>Hi Andi,
>
>a) I think we need a new release
>
>b) I don't think we need to solve all the build issues before the next
>release
>
>c) I'd prefer to call the next release 6.0.0 or failing that 5.1.0. The
>log4j change makes calling next release 5.0.1 problematic for me. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sunday 29 August 2021, 18:57:42 IST, Andreas Beeker
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi Devs,
>
>a) what's your opinion about rolling the next release?
>
>From my side, only the distsource build is not implemented in gradle
>and a few of the release task need to be done manually.
>
>b) Now that the gradle dist plugin picks up all the dependencies, how
>important is the distsource check?
>
>c) what's our next release version? 5.0.1,  5.1 or 6.0
>
>Andi
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Next release of POI

[PJ Fanning]

Hi Andi,

a) I think we need a new release

b) I don't think we need to solve all the build issues before the next release

c) I'd prefer to call the next release 6.0.0 or failing that 5.1.0. The log4j 
change makes calling next release 5.0.1 problematic for me. 






On Sunday 29 August 2021, 18:57:42 IST, Andreas Beeker  
wrote: 





Hi Devs,

a) what's your opinion about rolling the next release?

>From my side, only the distsource build is not implemented in gradle and a few 
>of the release task need to be done manually.

b) Now that the gradle dist plugin picks up all the dependencies, how important 
is the distsource check?

c) what's our next release version? 5.0.1,  5.1 or 6.0

Andi


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[Dominik Stadler]

Hi,

The first link actually compared current 4.1.0 to "4.0.2-SNAPSHOT", i.e.
some intermediate version. I have now re-run the comparison against 4.0.1
(called 4.0.1RC2 in my database), results are similar, but not fully equal.

The new comparison is available at the following links:

   - 4.0.1-RC2 to 4.1.0-RC1
   

   - 4.1.0-RC1-All
   


There are always a few possibilities for differences, some change actually
broke something that worked before. These are the changes that we are
looking for and should try to fix before release.

But sometimes we do more checks in the regression tests, then also some
files may fail which worked before (this time at least the ones with
HSSFOptimiser.optimiseFonts in the stacktrace).  These do not need to be
fixed as it was caused by production-code change.

Finally sometimes new support for features triggers new failures, e.g. by
making it possible to handle more types of images, we triggered a few
things in the slideshow-handling. We can try to fix those, but sometimes it
is hard and we may decide to release nevertheless.

Dominik.

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:14 PM Greg Woolsey  wrote:

> When was the previous regression run?
>
> Some of the formula errors mention invalid sheet names, including
> empty strings.  The fix for #60460 committed Dec. 30 handled null
> sheet names in SheetNameEvaluator, but perhaps that change should also
> check and handle empty strings?
>
> I've never actually touched HSSF, but since the vast majority of these
> new failures in o.a.p.ss.formula.* involve stacks with "*Name*"
> methods and HSSF files, this seems like a reasonable place to start
> looking.
>
> Several of the o.a.p.ss.formula.* errors are for known
> not-yet-supported items, like SxNamePtg (id=0x18, prints as "24" in
> the stacks)
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:28 AM Dominik Stadler 
> wrote:
> >
> > A first run of the regression tests for Apache POI is done. It still uses
> > XMLBeans 3.0.2, I will re-run a 2nd time later when we have XmlBeans
> 3.0.3
> > final available.
> >
> > There are new failures with a high amount of failing documents compared
> to
> > 4.0.x, however these are caused by the addition of a call to
> > HSSFOptimiser.optimiseFonts() in the regression test itself, so these are
> > not actual regressions, just more testing.
> >
> > Apart from that a number of SlideShow drawing related items, probably due
> > to support for more features and a few FormulaParser related ones which
> we
> > should take a quick look at why they fail now.
> >
> > Details are available at the following links:
> >
> >- 4.0.1-RC1 to 4.1.0-RC1
> ><
> http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index402SNAPSHOTto410RC1.html
> >
> >- 4.1.0-RC1-All
> ><
> http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reportsAll/index402SNAPSHOTto410RC1.html
> >
> >
> > Dominik.
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:41 PM pj.fanning  wrote:
> >
> > > For xmlbeans, I would recommend getting the release jars and zips from
> > >
> > >
> https://builds.apache.org/view/P/view/POI/job/POI-XMLBeans-DSL-1.6/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/
> > >
> > > This guarantees the jars were built with Java 6.
> > >
> > > For the nexus release, I follow this guide:
> > >
> > >
> https://central.sonatype.org/pages/manual-staging-bundle-creation-and-deployment.html
> > >
> > > I use `gpg -ab` to create the asc files for the 3 jars and for the pom
> > > file.
> > > I use the pom file from the previous release and edit it to update the
> > > version. Create a bundle.jar as described in the sonatype link and
> upload
> > > the bundle.jar to https://repository.apache.org/
> > >
> > > To release the source and bin bundles, you need to use svn to work with
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/poi/xmlbeans/release svn
> repo.
> > >
> > > The xmlbeans site is updated using the svn repo
> > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlbeans/site
> > >
> > > If you have questions, feel free to reach out.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sent from:
> http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
> > >
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
> > >
> > >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>
>

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[Greg Woolsey]

When was the previous regression run?

Some of the formula errors mention invalid sheet names, including
empty strings.  The fix for #60460 committed Dec. 30 handled null
sheet names in SheetNameEvaluator, but perhaps that change should also
check and handle empty strings?

I've never actually touched HSSF, but since the vast majority of these
new failures in o.a.p.ss.formula.* involve stacks with "*Name*"
methods and HSSF files, this seems like a reasonable place to start
looking.

Several of the o.a.p.ss.formula.* errors are for known
not-yet-supported items, like SxNamePtg (id=0x18, prints as "24" in
the stacks)

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:28 AM Dominik Stadler  wrote:
>
> A first run of the regression tests for Apache POI is done. It still uses
> XMLBeans 3.0.2, I will re-run a 2nd time later when we have XmlBeans 3.0.3
> final available.
>
> There are new failures with a high amount of failing documents compared to
> 4.0.x, however these are caused by the addition of a call to
> HSSFOptimiser.optimiseFonts() in the regression test itself, so these are
> not actual regressions, just more testing.
>
> Apart from that a number of SlideShow drawing related items, probably due
> to support for more features and a few FormulaParser related ones which we
> should take a quick look at why they fail now.
>
> Details are available at the following links:
>
>- 4.0.1-RC1 to 4.1.0-RC1
>
> 
>- 4.1.0-RC1-All
>
> 
>
> Dominik.
>
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:41 PM pj.fanning  wrote:
>
> > For xmlbeans, I would recommend getting the release jars and zips from
> >
> > https://builds.apache.org/view/P/view/POI/job/POI-XMLBeans-DSL-1.6/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/
> >
> > This guarantees the jars were built with Java 6.
> >
> > For the nexus release, I follow this guide:
> >
> > https://central.sonatype.org/pages/manual-staging-bundle-creation-and-deployment.html
> >
> > I use `gpg -ab` to create the asc files for the 3 jars and for the pom
> > file.
> > I use the pom file from the previous release and edit it to update the
> > version. Create a bundle.jar as described in the sonatype link and upload
> > the bundle.jar to https://repository.apache.org/
> >
> > To release the source and bin bundles, you need to use svn to work with
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/poi/xmlbeans/release svn repo.
> >
> > The xmlbeans site is updated using the svn repo
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlbeans/site
> >
> > If you have questions, feel free to reach out.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
> >
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[Dominik Stadler]

A first run of the regression tests for Apache POI is done. It still uses
XMLBeans 3.0.2, I will re-run a 2nd time later when we have XmlBeans 3.0.3
final available.

There are new failures with a high amount of failing documents compared to
4.0.x, however these are caused by the addition of a call to
HSSFOptimiser.optimiseFonts() in the regression test itself, so these are
not actual regressions, just more testing.

Apart from that a number of SlideShow drawing related items, probably due
to support for more features and a few FormulaParser related ones which we
should take a quick look at why they fail now.

Details are available at the following links:

   - 4.0.1-RC1 to 4.1.0-RC1
   

   - 4.1.0-RC1-All
   


Dominik.

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 10:41 PM pj.fanning  wrote:

> For xmlbeans, I would recommend getting the release jars and zips from
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/P/view/POI/job/POI-XMLBeans-DSL-1.6/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/build/
>
> This guarantees the jars were built with Java 6.
>
> For the nexus release, I follow this guide:
>
> https://central.sonatype.org/pages/manual-staging-bundle-creation-and-deployment.html
>
> I use `gpg -ab` to create the asc files for the 3 jars and for the pom
> file.
> I use the pom file from the previous release and edit it to update the
> version. Create a bundle.jar as described in the sonatype link and upload
> the bundle.jar to https://repository.apache.org/
>
> To release the source and bin bundles, you need to use svn to work with
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/poi/xmlbeans/release svn repo.
>
> The xmlbeans site is updated using the svn repo
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlbeans/site
>
> If you have questions, feel free to reach out.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>
>

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[Andreas Beeker]

Hi Greg,

> 1. what work remains before releasing a new XMLBeans?

I'm not committing to trunk currently, but to a branch. I'm not planning to 
include my changes in the current release, as I haven't tested them yet 
thoroughly.

> 2. How do I build, tag, and release XMLBeans?

tag: via svn

build: ant package

release:
create sha files manually - actually you still need to create sha1/md5 because 
of INFRA-14923
via svn -> upload to dist area
and via nexus upload + own pom.xml

> 3. What version numbers do we want to use?

your versions are correct


The high "don't screw this up" quotient is good, at least we benefit if someone 
else is looking through the process.
The only bit which is kind of irreversible is the nexus release to maven 
central, which has to be manually invoked.

So give it a go, we will have a look at the release candidate files anyways.

Thank you for taking care of the releases.

Andi





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[Greg Woolsey]

OK, I think I'm reasonably familiar now with the POI release build
process, thank you to all who have contributed to the detailed
release-guide.txt.

However, there is no such document I can find for XMLBeans, and it
sounds like there may be an open question or two there?

Further, if I'm reading the emails correctly, there are changes to
XMLBeans that should be released first, so that POI can be updated to
use that new version before building a POI release candidate.  Is that
correct?

So, my questions, for timing and completeness, are:

1. what work remains before releasing a new XMLBeans?
2. How do I build, tag, and release XMLBeans?
3. What version numbers do we want to use?  These seem to be the next ones up:
   - XMLBeans 3.0.3
   - POI 4.1.0

I'm sure there will be more, not having driven a release before, and
experiencing a high "don't screw this up" quotient :)

Greg

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 12:47 PM Andreas Beeker  wrote:
>
> On 18.03.19 06:11, Greg Woolsey wrote:
> > I've not done a release yet, but I'd be willing to read the docs and
> > take a stab at it if no one else has time.
>
> Regarding POI:
>
> After setting up the environment - its merely calling the release-prep* 
> scripts.
> I haven't yet updated the link to commons-openpgp - the current snapshot 
> version should be compatible to the current bouncycastle jar.
>
>
> Regarding XmlBeans:
>
> I've started to modify the build to include the maven pom on my branch,
> but for trunk you need to download a recent pom.xml and update the 
> information manually,
>
> @PJ: since 19.01.19 there's xmlbeans nexus upload lingering around - maybe 
> you want to drop it?
>
>
> For both projects, you should be able to access the nexus staging areas:
> http://repository.apache.org
> -> login with your Apache credentials
> -> Staging profiles : should contain xmlbeans and poi entries
>
> Andi
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[pj.fanning]

I've dropped the xmlbeans staging jars.



--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[Andreas Beeker]

On 18.03.19 06:11, Greg Woolsey wrote:
> I've not done a release yet, but I'd be willing to read the docs and
> take a stab at it if no one else has time.

Regarding POI:

After setting up the environment - its merely calling the release-prep* scripts.
I haven't yet updated the link to commons-openpgp - the current snapshot 
version should be compatible to the current bouncycastle jar.


Regarding XmlBeans:

I've started to modify the build to include the maven pom on my branch,
but for trunk you need to download a recent pom.xml and update the information 
manually,

@PJ: since 19.01.19 there's xmlbeans nexus upload lingering around - maybe you 
want to drop it?


For both projects, you should be able to access the nexus staging areas:
http://repository.apache.org
-> login with your Apache credentials
-> Staging profiles : should contain xmlbeans and poi entries

Andi




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[Yegor Kozlov]

+1 to release.

The snapshots are in a good shape and we've fixed  a solid number of bugs
since last release.

Yegor

сб, 16 мар. 2019 г., 23:30 Andreas Beeker :

> Hi *,
>
> I'm currently working on getting XmlBeans fit for Java 9+ - i.e. moving
> the resources from /schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans to a real package and being
> compatible to former releases - and it gives me a bit of a hard time.
>
> But nevertheless we might want push the next release for POI and XmlBeans.
>
> I'm busy next week, but could take care about the releases the week
> afterwards.
>
> How is everyone with the current snapshot of both?
>
> Anyone willing to jump in as a release manager?
>
> Andi
>
>
>

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[Dominik Stadler]

Yeah, good time to release some of the bugfixes that went into both source
trees!

Dominik.

On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 6:11 AM Greg Woolsey  wrote:

> I don't notice XMLBeans except when it breaks, and it hasn't been for
> me, so I'm happy with that.  I'd love a new release soon with the
> change I just made, that would help a lot with some significant
> changes I'm submitting to the Vaadin UI component that uses POI.  And
> it was my math error in the first place.  Sigh.
>
> I've not done a release yet, but I'd be willing to read the docs and
> take a stab at it if no one else has time.
>
> On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 1:30 PM Andreas Beeker 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi *,
> >
> > I'm currently working on getting XmlBeans fit for Java 9+ - i.e. moving
> the resources from /schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans to a real package and being
> compatible to former releases - and it gives me a bit of a hard time.
> >
> > But nevertheless we might want push the next release for POI and
> XmlBeans.
> >
> > I'm busy next week, but could take care about the releases the week
> afterwards.
> >
> > How is everyone with the current snapshot of both?
> >
> > Anyone willing to jump in as a release manager?
> >
> > Andi
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org
>
>

Re: Next release of POI/XmlBeans?

[Greg Woolsey]

I don't notice XMLBeans except when it breaks, and it hasn't been for
me, so I'm happy with that.  I'd love a new release soon with the
change I just made, that would help a lot with some significant
changes I'm submitting to the Vaadin UI component that uses POI.  And
it was my math error in the first place.  Sigh.

I've not done a release yet, but I'd be willing to read the docs and
take a stab at it if no one else has time.

On Sat, Mar 16, 2019 at 1:30 PM Andreas Beeker  wrote:
>
> Hi *,
>
> I'm currently working on getting XmlBeans fit for Java 9+ - i.e. moving the 
> resources from /schemaorg_apache_xmlbeans to a real package and being 
> compatible to former releases - and it gives me a bit of a hard time.
>
> But nevertheless we might want push the next release for POI and XmlBeans.
>
> I'm busy next week, but could take care about the releases the week 
> afterwards.
>
> How is everyone with the current snapshot of both?
>
> Anyone willing to jump in as a release manager?
>
> Andi
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@poi.apache.org