Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.12.0 Release (RC2)
Sorry I didn't catch this before RC1. Thank you Chan. On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Chan Leewrote: > Mars, this seems like a necessary change, so I'll create RC3 with the PR > and additional updates here: http://predictionio.incubator.apache.org/ > resources/upgrade/ > > If there are changes anyone would like to add, please let me know by today. > I'll patch up another release tonight and send out a new email. > > Thanks, > Chan > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Donald Szeto wrote: > > > Votes are tied to tag/commit by ASF convention, so a new RC and vote will > > be required. > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:57 AM Mars Hall > > wrote: > > > > > I just opened a release notes PR against apache:release/0.12.0, because > > > that seems to be the right place. > > > > > > Chan, will that work okay with the release process? > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Mars Hall > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Also, I'd love to directly link the PIO-* issue numbers to JIRA. > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Mars Hall < > mars.h...@salesforce.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> RC2 is working perfectly. > > > >> > > > >> I see a few issues with the releases notes: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>- PIO-95 should be "Raised request timeout for REST API to > > > 35-seconds" > > > >>- PIO-102, PIO-106, PIO-117, PIO-118, PIO-120 actually includes a > > > >>breaking change to Elasticsearch 5.x StorageClient interface. I > > > think these > > > >>should be enumerated more explicitly with one of them called out > > in a > > > >>"Breaking changes" section. > > > >> > > > >> May I revise RELEASE.md on develop to fix these issues? Does that > > > require > > > >> restarting vote for an RC3? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Donald Szeto > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I believe those are fixed by PIO-60, PIO-62 and PIO-63 in the > release > > > >>> notes. > > > >>> > > > >>> +1 binding from me > > > >>> > > > >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM Pat Ferrel > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > The last release was hung up by the IPMC regarding content > > licensing > > > >>> > issues and libraries used by the doc site, which we promised to > > > >>> address in > > > >>> > this release. Have these been resolved, don’t recall the > specifics? > > > It > > > >>> > would be great to fly through the IPMC vote without issue. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Chan Lee > > wrote: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > This is the vote for 0.12.0 of Apache PredictionIO (incubating). > > > >>> > > > > >>> > The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on Sep > 17th, > > > >>> 2017. > > > >>> > > > > >>> > The release candidate artifacts can be downloaded here: > > > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/predi > > > >>> > ctionio/0.12.0-incubating-rc2 > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Test results of RC1 can be found here: https://travis-ci.org/ap > > > >>> > ache/incubator-predictionio/builds/275634960 > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Maven artifacts are built from the release candidate artifacts > > above, > > > >>> and > > > >>> > are provided as convenience for testing with engine templates. > The > > > >>> Maven > > > >>> > artifacts are provided at the Maven staging repo here: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache > > > >>> predictionio-1020 > > > >>> > > > > >>> > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion > = > > > >>> > 0.12.0-incubating'. You can view them here: > > https://issues.apache.or > > > >>> > g/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12340591& > projectId=12320420 > > > >>> > > > > >>> > The artifacts have been signed with Key: ytX8GpWv > > > >>> > > > > >>> > Please vote accordingly: > > > >>> > > > > >>> > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release > > > >>> > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release > because... > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> -- > > > >> *Mars Hall > > > >> 415-818-7039 <(415)%20818-7039> > > > >> Customer Facing Architect > > > >> Salesforce Platform / Heroku > > > >> San Francisco, California > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Mars Hall > > > > 415-818-7039 <(415)%20818-7039> > > > > Customer Facing Architect > > > > Salesforce Platform / Heroku > > > > San Francisco, California > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Mars Hall > > > 415-818-7039 > > > Customer Facing Architect > > > Salesforce Platform / Heroku > > > San Francisco, California > > > > > > -- *Mars Hall 415-818-7039 Customer Facing Architect Salesforce Platform / Heroku San Francisco, California
Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.12.0 Release (RC2)
Mars, this seems like a necessary change, so I'll create RC3 with the PR and additional updates here: http://predictionio.incubator.apache.org/ resources/upgrade/ If there are changes anyone would like to add, please let me know by today. I'll patch up another release tonight and send out a new email. Thanks, Chan On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Donald Szetowrote: > Votes are tied to tag/commit by ASF convention, so a new RC and vote will > be required. > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:57 AM Mars Hall > wrote: > > > I just opened a release notes PR against apache:release/0.12.0, because > > that seems to be the right place. > > > > Chan, will that work okay with the release process? > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Mars Hall > > wrote: > > > > > Also, I'd love to directly link the PIO-* issue numbers to JIRA. > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Mars Hall > > > wrote: > > > > > >> RC2 is working perfectly. > > >> > > >> I see a few issues with the releases notes: > > >> > > >> > > >>- PIO-95 should be "Raised request timeout for REST API to > > 35-seconds" > > >>- PIO-102, PIO-106, PIO-117, PIO-118, PIO-120 actually includes a > > >>breaking change to Elasticsearch 5.x StorageClient interface. I > > think these > > >>should be enumerated more explicitly with one of them called out > in a > > >>"Breaking changes" section. > > >> > > >> May I revise RELEASE.md on develop to fix these issues? Does that > > require > > >> restarting vote for an RC3? > > >> > > >> > > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Donald Szeto > > wrote: > > >> > > >>> I believe those are fixed by PIO-60, PIO-62 and PIO-63 in the release > > >>> notes. > > >>> > > >>> +1 binding from me > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM Pat Ferrel > > >>> wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > The last release was hung up by the IPMC regarding content > licensing > > >>> > issues and libraries used by the doc site, which we promised to > > >>> address in > > >>> > this release. Have these been resolved, don’t recall the specifics? > > It > > >>> > would be great to fly through the IPMC vote without issue. > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Chan Lee > wrote: > > >>> > > > >>> > This is the vote for 0.12.0 of Apache PredictionIO (incubating). > > >>> > > > >>> > The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on Sep 17th, > > >>> 2017. > > >>> > > > >>> > The release candidate artifacts can be downloaded here: > > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/predi > > >>> > ctionio/0.12.0-incubating-rc2 > > >>> > > > >>> > Test results of RC1 can be found here: https://travis-ci.org/ap > > >>> > ache/incubator-predictionio/builds/275634960 > > >>> > > > >>> > Maven artifacts are built from the release candidate artifacts > above, > > >>> and > > >>> > are provided as convenience for testing with engine templates. The > > >>> Maven > > >>> > artifacts are provided at the Maven staging repo here: > > >>> > > > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache > > >>> predictionio-1020 > > >>> > > > >>> > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion = > > >>> > 0.12.0-incubating'. You can view them here: > https://issues.apache.or > > >>> > g/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12340591=12320420 > > >>> > > > >>> > The artifacts have been signed with Key: ytX8GpWv > > >>> > > > >>> > Please vote accordingly: > > >>> > > > >>> > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release > > >>> > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release because... > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> *Mars Hall > > >> 415-818-7039 <(415)%20818-7039> > > >> Customer Facing Architect > > >> Salesforce Platform / Heroku > > >> San Francisco, California > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > *Mars Hall > > > 415-818-7039 <(415)%20818-7039> > > > Customer Facing Architect > > > Salesforce Platform / Heroku > > > San Francisco, California > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Mars Hall > > 415-818-7039 > > Customer Facing Architect > > Salesforce Platform / Heroku > > San Francisco, California > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.12.0 Release (RC2)
Votes are tied to tag/commit by ASF convention, so a new RC and vote will be required. On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:57 AM Mars Hallwrote: > I just opened a release notes PR against apache:release/0.12.0, because > that seems to be the right place. > > Chan, will that work okay with the release process? > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Mars Hall > wrote: > > > Also, I'd love to directly link the PIO-* issue numbers to JIRA. > > > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Mars Hall > > wrote: > > > >> RC2 is working perfectly. > >> > >> I see a few issues with the releases notes: > >> > >> > >>- PIO-95 should be "Raised request timeout for REST API to > 35-seconds" > >>- PIO-102, PIO-106, PIO-117, PIO-118, PIO-120 actually includes a > >>breaking change to Elasticsearch 5.x StorageClient interface. I > think these > >>should be enumerated more explicitly with one of them called out in a > >>"Breaking changes" section. > >> > >> May I revise RELEASE.md on develop to fix these issues? Does that > require > >> restarting vote for an RC3? > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Donald Szeto > wrote: > >> > >>> I believe those are fixed by PIO-60, PIO-62 and PIO-63 in the release > >>> notes. > >>> > >>> +1 binding from me > >>> > >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM Pat Ferrel > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> > The last release was hung up by the IPMC regarding content licensing > >>> > issues and libraries used by the doc site, which we promised to > >>> address in > >>> > this release. Have these been resolved, don’t recall the specifics? > It > >>> > would be great to fly through the IPMC vote without issue. > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Chan Lee wrote: > >>> > > >>> > This is the vote for 0.12.0 of Apache PredictionIO (incubating). > >>> > > >>> > The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on Sep 17th, > >>> 2017. > >>> > > >>> > The release candidate artifacts can be downloaded here: > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/predi > >>> > ctionio/0.12.0-incubating-rc2 > >>> > > >>> > Test results of RC1 can be found here: https://travis-ci.org/ap > >>> > ache/incubator-predictionio/builds/275634960 > >>> > > >>> > Maven artifacts are built from the release candidate artifacts above, > >>> and > >>> > are provided as convenience for testing with engine templates. The > >>> Maven > >>> > artifacts are provided at the Maven staging repo here: > >>> > > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache > >>> predictionio-1020 > >>> > > >>> > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion = > >>> > 0.12.0-incubating'. You can view them here: https://issues.apache.or > >>> > g/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12340591=12320420 > >>> > > >>> > The artifacts have been signed with Key: ytX8GpWv > >>> > > >>> > Please vote accordingly: > >>> > > >>> > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release > >>> > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release because... > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> *Mars Hall > >> 415-818-7039 <(415)%20818-7039> > >> Customer Facing Architect > >> Salesforce Platform / Heroku > >> San Francisco, California > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > *Mars Hall > > 415-818-7039 <(415)%20818-7039> > > Customer Facing Architect > > Salesforce Platform / Heroku > > San Francisco, California > > > > > > -- > *Mars Hall > 415-818-7039 > Customer Facing Architect > Salesforce Platform / Heroku > San Francisco, California >
Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.12.0 Release (RC2)
I just opened a release notes PR against apache:release/0.12.0, because that seems to be the right place. Chan, will that work okay with the release process? On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Mars Hallwrote: > Also, I'd love to directly link the PIO-* issue numbers to JIRA. > > On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Mars Hall > wrote: > >> RC2 is working perfectly. >> >> I see a few issues with the releases notes: >> >> >>- PIO-95 should be "Raised request timeout for REST API to 35-seconds" >>- PIO-102, PIO-106, PIO-117, PIO-118, PIO-120 actually includes a >>breaking change to Elasticsearch 5.x StorageClient interface. I think >> these >>should be enumerated more explicitly with one of them called out in a >>"Breaking changes" section. >> >> May I revise RELEASE.md on develop to fix these issues? Does that require >> restarting vote for an RC3? >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Donald Szeto wrote: >> >>> I believe those are fixed by PIO-60, PIO-62 and PIO-63 in the release >>> notes. >>> >>> +1 binding from me >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM Pat Ferrel >>> wrote: >>> >>> > The last release was hung up by the IPMC regarding content licensing >>> > issues and libraries used by the doc site, which we promised to >>> address in >>> > this release. Have these been resolved, don’t recall the specifics? It >>> > would be great to fly through the IPMC vote without issue. >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Chan Lee wrote: >>> > >>> > This is the vote for 0.12.0 of Apache PredictionIO (incubating). >>> > >>> > The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on Sep 17th, >>> 2017. >>> > >>> > The release candidate artifacts can be downloaded here: >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/predi >>> > ctionio/0.12.0-incubating-rc2 >>> > >>> > Test results of RC1 can be found here: https://travis-ci.org/ap >>> > ache/incubator-predictionio/builds/275634960 >>> > >>> > Maven artifacts are built from the release candidate artifacts above, >>> and >>> > are provided as convenience for testing with engine templates. The >>> Maven >>> > artifacts are provided at the Maven staging repo here: >>> > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache >>> predictionio-1020 >>> > >>> > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion = >>> > 0.12.0-incubating'. You can view them here: https://issues.apache.or >>> > g/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12340591=12320420 >>> > >>> > The artifacts have been signed with Key: ytX8GpWv >>> > >>> > Please vote accordingly: >>> > >>> > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release >>> > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release because... >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> *Mars Hall >> 415-818-7039 <(415)%20818-7039> >> Customer Facing Architect >> Salesforce Platform / Heroku >> San Francisco, California >> > > > > -- > *Mars Hall > 415-818-7039 <(415)%20818-7039> > Customer Facing Architect > Salesforce Platform / Heroku > San Francisco, California > -- *Mars Hall 415-818-7039 Customer Facing Architect Salesforce Platform / Heroku San Francisco, California
[GitHub] incubator-predictionio pull request #435: Revise release notes: clarify brea...
GitHub user mars opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/435 Revise release notes: clarify breaking changes; link issue IDs to JIRA You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/mars/incubator-predictionio patch-1 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/435.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #435 commit cbe7063c869611f7ece0613a16cf0bebf22e404e Author: Mars HallDate: 2017-09-15T17:53:02Z Revise release notes: clarify breaking changes; link issue IDs to JIRA ---
[jira] [Updated] (PIO-95) Raise request timeout for REST API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-95?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mars Hall updated PIO-95: - Summary: Raise request timeout for REST API (was: Configurable request timeout for REST API) > Raise request timeout for REST API > -- > > Key: PIO-95 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-95 > Project: PredictionIO > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Core >Affects Versions: 0.11.0-incubating >Reporter: Mars Hall >Assignee: Mars Hall > Fix For: 0.12.0-incubating > > > We've found the default 20-second REST API request timeout is too short for > our batch-prediction use cases. We're running PredictionIO on Heroku which > has its own [timeout starting at > 30-seconds|https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/limits#http-timeouts]. So > we'd prefer a more generous or easily configurable timeout to allow Heroku's > routing layer to impose & track this limit in the platform layer. > I investigated how to configure this and found [Spray > `application.conf`|http://spray.io/documentation/1.2.4/spray-can/configuration/]. > This PR simply increases the timeout. > I would love guidance on how we might extract this config into an environment > variable or a value in `pio-env.sh`. > Investigation / implementation PR: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio/pull/394 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.12.0 Release (RC2)
RC2 is working perfectly. I see a few issues with the releases notes: - PIO-95 should be "Raised request timeout for REST API to 35-seconds" - PIO-102, PIO-106, PIO-117, PIO-118, PIO-120 actually includes a breaking change to Elasticsearch 5.x StorageClient interface. I think these should be enumerated more explicitly with one of them called out in a "Breaking changes" section. May I revise RELEASE.md on develop to fix these issues? Does that require restarting vote for an RC3? On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 11:49 PM, Donald Szetowrote: > I believe those are fixed by PIO-60, PIO-62 and PIO-63 in the release > notes. > > +1 binding from me > > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM Pat Ferrel wrote: > > > The last release was hung up by the IPMC regarding content licensing > > issues and libraries used by the doc site, which we promised to address > in > > this release. Have these been resolved, don’t recall the specifics? It > > would be great to fly through the IPMC vote without issue. > > > > > > On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Chan Lee wrote: > > > > This is the vote for 0.12.0 of Apache PredictionIO (incubating). > > > > The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on Sep 17th, 2017. > > > > The release candidate artifacts can be downloaded here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/predi > > ctionio/0.12.0-incubating-rc2 > > > > Test results of RC1 can be found here: https://travis-ci.org/ap > > ache/incubator-predictionio/builds/275634960 > > > > Maven artifacts are built from the release candidate artifacts above, and > > are provided as convenience for testing with engine templates. The Maven > > artifacts are provided at the Maven staging repo here: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > orgapachepredictionio-1020 > > > > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion = > > 0.12.0-incubating'. You can view them here: https://issues.apache.or > > g/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12340591=12320420 > > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key: ytX8GpWv > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release > > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release because... > > > > > -- *Mars Hall 415-818-7039 Customer Facing Architect Salesforce Platform / Heroku San Francisco, California
[GitHub] incubator-predictionio-template-recommender pull request #19: [WIP] 0.12.0-i...
GitHub user shimamoto opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio-template-recommender/pull/19 [WIP] 0.12.0-incubating release waiting for official 0.12.0 release You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/shimamoto/incubator-predictionio-template-recommender release-0.12.0-incubating Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio-template-recommender/pull/19.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #19 commit 9c431a6aecfdc67b73418256c63211368763a46b Author: shimamotoDate: 2017-09-15T04:44:41Z 0.12.0-incubating release ---
[GitHub] incubator-predictionio-template-ecom-recommender pull request #14: [WIP] 0.1...
GitHub user shimamoto opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio-template-ecom-recommender/pull/14 [WIP] 0.12.0-incubating release waiting for official 0.12.0 release You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/shimamoto/incubator-predictionio-template-ecom-recommender release-0.12.0-incubating Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio-template-ecom-recommender/pull/14.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #14 commit 5300fbc58b93b2eed1e4a9a212a4984e26f20ba5 Author: shimamotoDate: 2017-09-15T06:41:44Z 0.12.0-incubating release ---
[GitHub] incubator-predictionio-template-similar-product pull request #17: [WIP] 0.12...
GitHub user shimamoto opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio-template-similar-product/pull/17 [WIP] 0.12.0-incubating release waiting for official 0.12.0 release You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/shimamoto/incubator-predictionio-template-similar-product release-0.12.0-incubating Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio-template-similar-product/pull/17.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #17 commit c7890692a968c2c087ed477a0af69ac595ecc0b2 Author: shimamotoDate: 2017-09-15T07:36:57Z 0.12.0-incubating release ---
[GitHub] incubator-predictionio-template-attribute-based-classifier pull request #12:...
GitHub user shimamoto opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio-template-attribute-based-classifier/pull/12 [WIP] 0.12.0-incubating release waiting for official 0.12.0 release You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/shimamoto/incubator-predictionio-template-attribute-based-classifier release-0.12.0-incubating Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-predictionio-template-attribute-based-classifier/pull/12.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #12 commit 0e78268843093122d4d918941a69fadcf8b1e9ff Author: shimamotoDate: 2017-09-15T08:34:25Z 0.12.0-incubating release ---
[jira] [Commented] (PIO-122) always get Error initializing storage client for source ELASTICSEARCH in 0.11 when pio train
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16167425#comment-16167425 ] Donald Szeto commented on PIO-122: -- Can you provide information on * how you built PIO 0.11 * the template you are using * the {{conf/pio-env.sh}} of your PIO 0.11 build * Elasticsearch version * detail error message in {{pio.log}} where you run {{pio train}} ? > always get Error initializing storage client for source ELASTICSEARCH in 0.11 > when pio train > > > Key: PIO-122 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-122 > Project: PredictionIO > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core >Affects Versions: 0.11.0-incubating >Reporter: dongjie.shi > > Always get this error when I try to run PIO train to test a local PIO with > HBase and Elasticsearch. > [ERROR] [Storage$] Error initializing storage client for source ELASTICSEARCH > Exception in thread "main" > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.StorageClientException: Data source > ELASTICSEARCH was not properly initialized. > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$$anonfun$10.apply(Storage.scala:285) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$$anonfun$10.apply(Storage.scala:285) > at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:120) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$.getDataObject(Storage.scala:284) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$.getDataObjectFromRepo(Storage.scala:269) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$.getMetaDataEngineInstances(Storage.scala:371) > at > org.apache.predictionio.workflow.CreateWorkflow$.main(CreateWorkflow.scala:247) > at > org.apache.predictionio.workflow.CreateWorkflow.main(CreateWorkflow.scala) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497) > at > org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.org$apache$spark$deploy$SparkSubmit$$runMain(SparkSubmit.scala:731) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.doRunMain$1(SparkSubmit.scala:181) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.submit(SparkSubmit.scala:206) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.main(SparkSubmit.scala:121) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit.main(SparkSubmit.scala) > It seems that every component is ok in pio staus: > [INFO] [Management$] Your system is all ready to go. > And about the configurations in pio-env.conf, I have checked them for many > times. > PIO_FS_BASEDIR=${HOME}/.pio_store > PIO_FS_ENGINESDIR=${PIO_FS_BASEDIR}/engines > PIO_FS_TMPDIR=${PIO_FS_BASEDIR}/tmp > SPARK_HOME=${SPARK_HOME} > HBASE_CONF_DIR=${HBASE_HOME}/conf > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_METADATA_NAME=pio_meta > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_METADATA_SOURCE=ELASTICSEARCH > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_EVENTDATA_NAME=pio_event > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_EVENTDATA_SOURCE=HBASE > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_MODELDATA_NAME=pio_model > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_MODELDATA_SOURCE=LOCALFS > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_TYPE=elasticsearch > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_CLUSTERNAME=predictionio > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_HOSTS=localhost > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_PORTS=9300 > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_HOME=${ELASTICSEARCH_HOME} > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_LOCALFS_TYPE=localfs > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_LOCALFS_PATH=${PIO_FS_BASEDIR}/models > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_HBASE_TYPE=hbase > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_HBASE_HOME=${HBASE_HOME} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
Re: [VOTE] Apache PredictionIO (incubating) 0.12.0 Release (RC2)
I believe those are fixed by PIO-60, PIO-62 and PIO-63 in the release notes. +1 binding from me On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 2:13 PM Pat Ferrelwrote: > The last release was hung up by the IPMC regarding content licensing > issues and libraries used by the doc site, which we promised to address in > this release. Have these been resolved, don’t recall the specifics? It > would be great to fly through the IPMC vote without issue. > > > On Sep 14, 2017, at 2:06 PM, Chan Lee wrote: > > This is the vote for 0.12.0 of Apache PredictionIO (incubating). > > The vote will run for at least 72 hours and will close on Sep 17th, 2017. > > The release candidate artifacts can be downloaded here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/predi > ctionio/0.12.0-incubating-rc2 > > Test results of RC1 can be found here: https://travis-ci.org/ap > ache/incubator-predictionio/builds/275634960 > > Maven artifacts are built from the release candidate artifacts above, and > are provided as convenience for testing with engine templates. The Maven > artifacts are provided at the Maven staging repo here: > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachepredictionio-1020 > > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion = > 0.12.0-incubating'. You can view them here: https://issues.apache.or > g/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12340591=12320420 > > The artifacts have been signed with Key: ytX8GpWv > > Please vote accordingly: > > [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release > [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.12.0 release because... > >
[jira] [Comment Edited] (PIO-122) always get Error initializing storage client for source ELASTICSEARCH in 0.11 when pio train
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16167406#comment-16167406 ] dongjie.shi edited comment on PIO-122 at 9/15/17 6:35 AM: -- It works correctly when I change PIO to version 0.10.0. But for PIO 0.11.0, it always fail. was (Author: glorysdj): it is ok when i change pio to version 0.10.0 > always get Error initializing storage client for source ELASTICSEARCH in 0.11 > when pio train > > > Key: PIO-122 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-122 > Project: PredictionIO > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core >Affects Versions: 0.11.0-incubating >Reporter: dongjie.shi > > Always get this error when I try to run PIO train to test a local PIO with > HBase and Elasticsearch. > [ERROR] [Storage$] Error initializing storage client for source ELASTICSEARCH > Exception in thread "main" > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.StorageClientException: Data source > ELASTICSEARCH was not properly initialized. > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$$anonfun$10.apply(Storage.scala:285) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$$anonfun$10.apply(Storage.scala:285) > at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:120) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$.getDataObject(Storage.scala:284) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$.getDataObjectFromRepo(Storage.scala:269) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$.getMetaDataEngineInstances(Storage.scala:371) > at > org.apache.predictionio.workflow.CreateWorkflow$.main(CreateWorkflow.scala:247) > at > org.apache.predictionio.workflow.CreateWorkflow.main(CreateWorkflow.scala) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497) > at > org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.org$apache$spark$deploy$SparkSubmit$$runMain(SparkSubmit.scala:731) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.doRunMain$1(SparkSubmit.scala:181) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.submit(SparkSubmit.scala:206) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.main(SparkSubmit.scala:121) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit.main(SparkSubmit.scala) > It seems that every component is ok in pio staus: > [INFO] [Management$] Your system is all ready to go. > And about the configurations in pio-env.conf, I have checked them for many > times. > PIO_FS_BASEDIR=${HOME}/.pio_store > PIO_FS_ENGINESDIR=${PIO_FS_BASEDIR}/engines > PIO_FS_TMPDIR=${PIO_FS_BASEDIR}/tmp > SPARK_HOME=${SPARK_HOME} > HBASE_CONF_DIR=${HBASE_HOME}/conf > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_METADATA_NAME=pio_meta > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_METADATA_SOURCE=ELASTICSEARCH > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_EVENTDATA_NAME=pio_event > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_EVENTDATA_SOURCE=HBASE > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_MODELDATA_NAME=pio_model > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_MODELDATA_SOURCE=LOCALFS > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_TYPE=elasticsearch > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_CLUSTERNAME=predictionio > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_HOSTS=localhost > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_PORTS=9300 > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_HOME=${ELASTICSEARCH_HOME} > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_LOCALFS_TYPE=localfs > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_LOCALFS_PATH=${PIO_FS_BASEDIR}/models > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_HBASE_TYPE=hbase > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_HBASE_HOME=${HBASE_HOME} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)
[jira] [Commented] (PIO-122) always get Error initializing storage client for source ELASTICSEARCH in 0.11 when pio train
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16167406#comment-16167406 ] dongjie.shi commented on PIO-122: - it is ok when i change pio to version 0.10.0 > always get Error initializing storage client for source ELASTICSEARCH in 0.11 > when pio train > > > Key: PIO-122 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIO-122 > Project: PredictionIO > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core >Affects Versions: 0.11.0-incubating >Reporter: dongjie.shi > > Always get this error when I try to run PIO train to test a local PIO with > HBase and Elasticsearch. > [ERROR] [Storage$] Error initializing storage client for source ELASTICSEARCH > Exception in thread "main" > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.StorageClientException: Data source > ELASTICSEARCH was not properly initialized. > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$$anonfun$10.apply(Storage.scala:285) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$$anonfun$10.apply(Storage.scala:285) > at scala.Option.getOrElse(Option.scala:120) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$.getDataObject(Storage.scala:284) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$.getDataObjectFromRepo(Storage.scala:269) > at > org.apache.predictionio.data.storage.Storage$.getMetaDataEngineInstances(Storage.scala:371) > at > org.apache.predictionio.workflow.CreateWorkflow$.main(CreateWorkflow.scala:247) > at > org.apache.predictionio.workflow.CreateWorkflow.main(CreateWorkflow.scala) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at > sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:497) > at > org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.org$apache$spark$deploy$SparkSubmit$$runMain(SparkSubmit.scala:731) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.doRunMain$1(SparkSubmit.scala:181) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.submit(SparkSubmit.scala:206) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit$.main(SparkSubmit.scala:121) > at org.apache.spark.deploy.SparkSubmit.main(SparkSubmit.scala) > It seems that every component is ok in pio staus: > [INFO] [Management$] Your system is all ready to go. > And about the configurations in pio-env.conf, I have checked them for many > times. > PIO_FS_BASEDIR=${HOME}/.pio_store > PIO_FS_ENGINESDIR=${PIO_FS_BASEDIR}/engines > PIO_FS_TMPDIR=${PIO_FS_BASEDIR}/tmp > SPARK_HOME=${SPARK_HOME} > HBASE_CONF_DIR=${HBASE_HOME}/conf > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_METADATA_NAME=pio_meta > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_METADATA_SOURCE=ELASTICSEARCH > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_EVENTDATA_NAME=pio_event > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_EVENTDATA_SOURCE=HBASE > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_MODELDATA_NAME=pio_model > PIO_STORAGE_REPOSITORIES_MODELDATA_SOURCE=LOCALFS > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_TYPE=elasticsearch > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_CLUSTERNAME=predictionio > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_HOSTS=localhost > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_PORTS=9300 > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_ELASTICSEARCH_HOME=${ELASTICSEARCH_HOME} > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_LOCALFS_TYPE=localfs > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_LOCALFS_PATH=${PIO_FS_BASEDIR}/models > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_HBASE_TYPE=hbase > PIO_STORAGE_SOURCES_HBASE_HOME=${HBASE_HOME} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)