Re: [racket-dev] location of foldts?
Go for it. N. On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 5:38 AM, John Clements wrote: > Mind if I go ahead and do that? > > John _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] location of foldts?
On Mar 7, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Noel Welsh wrote: > Yes, something like that seems the right solution. > > N. Mind if I go ahead and do that? John > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Robby Findler > wrote: >> The rackunit foldts seems test-suite specific so perhaps it should be >> called foldts-test-suite (similar to fold-test-results). >> >> Robby smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] location of foldts?
Yes, something like that seems the right solution. N. On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Robby Findler wrote: > The rackunit foldts seems test-suite specific so perhaps it should be > called foldts-test-suite (similar to fold-test-results). > > Robby _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] location of foldts?
The rackunit foldts seems test-suite specific so perhaps it should be called foldts-test-suite (similar to fold-test-results). Robby On Monday, March 7, 2011, Noel Welsh wrote: > Maybe it should be in another library, then. foldts is an important > part of Rackunit's current API, though 1) nobody has ever used it > AFAIK, and 2) this might change in the near future. > > N. > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:20 PM, John Clements > wrote: >> Currently, 'foldts' is provided by rackunit. Not surprisingly, the sxml >> stuff also provides foldts. I'd rather just have one copy--especially >> because 'except-in' requires seem to sometimes incur large performance >> penalties--but I'm not really sure where that "right place" is. Honestly, I >> don't really think it belongs in rackunit, but I'm willing to be overruled. >> >> Can we do one of these? >> 1) not provide it from rackunit, >> 2) not provide it from rackunit and put it somewhere else, or >> 3) tell me that I'm wrong, and I'll just add a dependency from my sxml >> package to rackunit? >> >> John >> >> _ >> For list-related administrative tasks: >> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev >> > > _ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] location of foldts?
Maybe it should be in another library, then. foldts is an important part of Rackunit's current API, though 1) nobody has ever used it AFAIK, and 2) this might change in the near future. N. On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 11:20 PM, John Clements wrote: > Currently, 'foldts' is provided by rackunit. Not surprisingly, the sxml > stuff also provides foldts. I'd rather just have one copy--especially > because 'except-in' requires seem to sometimes incur large performance > penalties--but I'm not really sure where that "right place" is. Honestly, I > don't really think it belongs in rackunit, but I'm willing to be overruled. > > Can we do one of these? > 1) not provide it from rackunit, > 2) not provide it from rackunit and put it somewhere else, or > 3) tell me that I'm wrong, and I'll just add a dependency from my sxml > package to rackunit? > > John > > _ > For list-related administrative tasks: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev > _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
