Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1
On Jul 17, 2014, at 5:03 PM, Ryan Culpepper ry...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: * John Clements cleme...@brinckerhoff.org - Stepper Tests Done. Updates: - Stepper Updates: update HISTORY (updates should show v6.1 as the most current version; email me to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such changes.) Done. John _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
[racket-dev] pkg account creator not working?
I tried to make an account of pkgs.racket-lang.org, and it never emailed me a code. Is something in the pipeline not working? -Ian _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Help with build failed error message
Ok it turns out I had done (syntax/loc stx #’template) instead of (syntax/loc stx template) and somehow that seems to have triggered some kind of infinite recursive loop or something. But I fixed it and got another error that makes no sense at all. It seems like somehow a struct constructor is returning #f. raco setup: 0 making: pkgs/racket-test/tests/future struct-type/sc: broke its contract promised: static-contract? produced: #f in: the range of (- any/c static-contract?) contract from: pkgs/typed-racket-lib/typed-racket/static-contracts/combinators/struct.rkt blaming: pkgs/typed-racket-lib/typed-racket/static-contracts/combinators/struct.rkt (assuming the contract is correct) at: pkgs/typed-racket-lib/typed-racket/static-contracts/combinators/struct.rkt:19.5 (lines 1217-1227 of https://travis-ci.org/AlexKnauth/racket/jobs/30418536) Where struct-type/sc is defined like this in pkgs/typed-racket-lib/typed-racket/static-contracts/combinators/struct.rkt: (struct struct-type/sc combinator () #:transparent #:property prop:combinator-name struct-type/sc #:methods gen:sc [(define (sc-map v f) (match v [(struct-type/sc args) (struct-type/sc (map (λ (a) (f a 'covariant)) args))])) (define (sc-traverse v f) (match v [(struct-type/sc args) (for-each (λ (a) (f a 'covariant)) args) (void)])) (define (sc-contract v f) (match v [(struct-type/sc args) #`(struct-type/c #f)])) (define (sc-constraints v f) (match v [(struct-type/sc args) (simple-contract-restrict 'chaperone)]))]) I have no idea what to do. On Jul 20, 2014, at 2:15 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote: Killed means that the OS terminated the `racket/racket3m` process from the outside. For example, the process may have exceeded a memory-use limit. At Sat, 19 Jul 2014 20:25:24 -0400, Alexander D. Knauth wrote: I made a fork of the racket repo and committed some changes in a topic branch, but I got this: make[8]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/racket/src/build' make[7]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/racket/src/build' make[6]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/racket/src/build' racket/racket3m -X /home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/racket/collects -G /home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/racket/etc -G /home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/build/config -N raco -l- setup --no-user -j 2 raco setup: bootstrapping from source... Killed make[5]: *** [install-3m] Error 137 make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/racket/src/build' make[4]: *** [install] Error 2 make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket/racket/src/build' make[3]: *** [base] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket' make[2]: *** [plain-in-place] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket' make[1]: *** [cpus-in-place] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/travis/build/AlexKnauth/racket' make: *** [in-place] Error 2 The command make CPUS=2 PKGS=racket-test db-test unstable-flonum-lib net-test exited with 2. (lines 812-830 of https://travis-ci.org/AlexKnauth/racket/jobs/30368892) What does this mean? What does the “Killed” mean? And what is error 137? _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1
On 07/21/2014 02:05 AM, Matthew Flatt wrote: At Sun, 20 Jul 2014 22:37:36 -0700, Jon Rafkind wrote: On 07/17/2014 05:03 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote: * Jon Rafkind rafk...@cs.utah.edu Release tests for (one of the) linux releases: - Test that the `racket' and `racket-textual' source releases compile fine (note that they're still called `plt' and `mz' at this stage). - Test that the binary installers for both work, try each one in both normal and unix-style installation modes. (just ubuntu) [Note: get the release candidates from the URL in this email. Use the 'static table' link to see a list of all tar files available] Done, but I saw an error once during a build of racket-minimal-6.0.900.900-src.tgz during 'make install'. I accidentally destroyed the terminal and wasn't able to reproduce the error after two additional tries, so I'm not sure what went wrong but it was something like raco: building scribblings/framework.rkt sqlite3: unable to read from database I'll try once or twice more to see if it happens again. A minimal Racket build would not include documentation or framework. Was something installed in user scope with a previous v6.0.900.900 installation and maybe not removed before the Racket installation was itself removed? Oh sorry, wrong copy/paste. I meant racket-6.0.900.900-src.tgz. _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] pkg account creator not working?
What web browser are you using? I was only able to make an account using Chromium. (Firefox didn't work for me.) ~Leif Andersen On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:27 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: I tried to make an account of pkgs.racket-lang.org, and it never emailed me a code. Is something in the pipeline not working? -Ian _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] pkg account creator not working?
I've tried both now. No go. -Ian - Original Message - From: Leif Andersen l...@leifandersen.net To: J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu Cc: dev dev@racket-lang.org Sent: Monday, July 21, 2014 12:35:06 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern Subject: Re: [racket-dev] pkg account creator not working? What web browser are you using? I was only able to make an account using Chromium. (Firefox didn't work for me.) ~Leif Andersen On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 12:27 PM, J. Ian Johnson i...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: I tried to make an account of pkgs.racket-lang.org, and it never emailed me a code. Is something in the pipeline not working? -Ian _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1
At Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:03:12 -0400, Ryan Culpepper wrote: * Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu, Vincent St-Amour stamo...@ccs.neu.edu - Match Tests - Typed Racket Tests Done. - Typed Racket Updates: update HISTORY (updates should show v6.1 as the most current version; email me to pick the changes when they're done, or tell me if there are no such changes.) Sam, Asumu, Eric: what's new for this release? Vincent _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] flatten-begin
On 2014-07-19 23:12:51 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: This sounds like a nice solution and it would be fine for my use-case too. Anyone have any reasons against? (otherwise I can make the change) I just realized that `flatten-begin` actually doesn't care if the form starts with a `begin`. In other words, the following evalutes like this: (flatten-begin #'(a 1 2)) = (list #'2 #'3) In which case the behavior of #:all? becomes a bit weird since it would care about the head being a `begin` (otherwise it would collapse too manay things). Maybe the recursive flattener should be a different function after all? Cheers, Asumu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1
On 2014-07-21 16:14:27 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote: Sam, Asumu, Eric: what's new for this release? This came up on IRC the other day. I think Eric was saying the main changes were inference speedups, support for contracted functions, and better keyword support. Cheers, Asumu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] Pre-Release Checklist for v6.1
At Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:24:24 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: On 2014-07-21 16:14:27 -0400, Vincent St-Amour wrote: Sam, Asumu, Eric: what's new for this release? This came up on IRC the other day. I think Eric was saying the main changes were inference speedups, support for contracted functions, and better keyword support. Pushed as commit 5a12f8e77. Thanks! Vincent _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
Re: [racket-dev] flatten-begin
Yes, I agree. I don't have a good suggestion for the name, tho. Sorry. Robby On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Asumu Takikawa as...@ccs.neu.edu wrote: On 2014-07-19 23:12:51 -0400, Asumu Takikawa wrote: This sounds like a nice solution and it would be fine for my use-case too. Anyone have any reasons against? (otherwise I can make the change) I just realized that `flatten-begin` actually doesn't care if the form starts with a `begin`. In other words, the following evalutes like this: (flatten-begin #'(a 1 2)) = (list #'2 #'3) In which case the behavior of #:all? becomes a bit weird since it would care about the head being a `begin` (otherwise it would collapse too manay things). Maybe the recursive flattener should be a different function after all? Cheers, Asumu _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev
