Re: [racket-dev] `take-until' etc
Me too. I like `take-until' as well. 2011/6/8 Jay McCarthy jay.mccar...@gmail.com: I'd really like #:unless as well iPhoneから送信 On 2011/06/08, at 9:21, Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org wrote: Anyone seconds this? And if so, then maybe for-loops should have an `#:unless' too? (I know that this was raised, but now there's more experience using it.) Yesterday, Jay McCarthy wrote: I've used them before and I find they read better than using negate. 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org: Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev -- sam th sa...@ccs.neu.edu _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
[racket-dev] `take-until' etc
Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
Re: [racket-dev] `take-until' etc
I've used them before and I find they read better than using negate. 2011/6/7 Eli Barzilay e...@barzilay.org: Does anyone see a need for `take-until' (and `drop-' and `-right' versions), or is `negate' enough to not have that? -- ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay: http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life! _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev -- Jay McCarthy j...@cs.byu.edu Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay The glory of God is Intelligence - DC 93 _ For list-related administrative tasks: http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/dev
