Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0

[Jitendra Pandey]

Congratulations for 1.0.0 release!

Thank you all.

On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:57 PM Lokesh Jain  wrote:

> Thank you all for voting on the Apache Ratis Incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0.
>
> Vote passes with
> - 3 +1 binding votes
> - 3 +1 non-binding votes
> - 0 -1 votes
>
>  +1 votes from
>  - Arpit Agarwal (binding)
>  - Uma Maheshwara Rao G (binding)
>  - Jitendra Pandey (binding)
>  - Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze (non-binding)
>  - Lokesh Jain (non-binding)
>
> Regards
> Lokesh
>
>
> > On 19-Jul-2020, at 8:40 AM, Jitendra Pandey
>  wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -Verified checksums
> > -Built from source successfully
> > -Verified a few unit tests
> >
> > jitendra
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 11:55 AM Tsz Sze 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (non-binding)
> >>
> >> - Verified all checksums and signatures.
> >> - Checked DISCLAIMER  LICENSE  and NOTICE.
> >> - Built from source successfully.
> >> - Passed all unit tests.
> >>
> >> Thanks for working on this!
> >>
> >> Tsz-Wo
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:19 PM Uma gangumalla 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> +1 (binding)
> >>>
> >>> -NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER looks good.
> >>> -Incubator in name
> >>> -Build from source and RAT checks clean
> >>> - Ran tests and all of them passed from me.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Uma
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:20 AM Arpit Agarwal
> >> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>
> >>>> - Release is in the right location
> >>>> - Verified signatures. checksums
> >>>> - NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER ok
> >>>> - Source matches git tag, no binaries in source tarball. There are a
> >> few
> >>>>   empty dirs in the source tarball but not in the source repo. Should
> >> be
> >>>> harmless.
> >>>> - Built from source, ran unit tests. One known flaky test failed.
> >>>> - Incubating in name
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jul 15, 2020, at 4:48 AM, Lokesh Jain  wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi IPMC,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Apache Ratis community has voted and approved the proposal to
> >>>>> release Apache Ratis incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0. We now kindly
> >> request
> >>>>> the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this incubator
> >> release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Apache Ratis is an open source Java implementation for RAFT consensus
> >>>>> protocol. RAFT is being used successfully as an alternative to Paxos
> >> to
> >>>>> implement a consistently replicated log. RAFT is proven to be safe
> >> and
> >>>>> is designed to be simpler to understand.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [VOTE] Thread:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf942c72a3213ef43fe2aaab7268d80b09b715f1f743345025e9396a9%40%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
> >>>> <
> >>>>
> >>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf942c72a3213ef43fe2aaab7268d80b09b715f1f743345025e9396a9@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The git tag to be voted upon:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-1.0.0-rc0
> >>>> <
> >>>>
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-1.0.0-rc0
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The git commit hash:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=f35d5e542845a7f46805706892547964c86650a5
> >>>> <
> >>>>
> >>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=f35d5e542845a7f46805706892547964c86650a5
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/1.0.0/rc0/ <
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/1.0.0/rc0/>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> >>>>> 33C4 1949 16C6 A4DD A6A6  A8BF C038 41BD 42EF CC9D
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS <
> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>>> Please vote on releasing this RC.  Thank you in advance.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [ ] +1 approve
> >>>>> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >>>>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Starting with my +1 (non-binding).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Lokesh Jain
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 (binding)

-Verified checksums
-Built from source successfully
-Verified a few unit tests

jitendra

On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 11:55 AM Tsz Sze 
wrote:

> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Verified all checksums and signatures.
> - Checked DISCLAIMER  LICENSE  and NOTICE.
> - Built from source successfully.
> - Passed all unit tests.
>
> Thanks for working on this!
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 3:19 PM Uma gangumalla 
> wrote:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > -NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER looks good.
> > -Incubator in name
> > -Build from source and RAT checks clean
> > - Ran tests and all of them passed from me.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Uma
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 8:20 AM Arpit Agarwal
> 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > - Release is in the right location
> > > - Verified signatures. checksums
> > > - NOTICE, LICENSE, DISCLAIMER ok
> > > - Source matches git tag, no binaries in source tarball. There are a
> few
> > >empty dirs in the source tarball but not in the source repo. Should
> be
> > > harmless.
> > > - Built from source, ran unit tests. One known flaky test failed.
> > > - Incubating in name
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Jul 15, 2020, at 4:48 AM, Lokesh Jain  wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi IPMC,
> > > >
> > > > The Apache Ratis community has voted and approved the proposal to
> > > > release Apache Ratis incubating Release 1.0.0 rc0. We now kindly
> request
> > > > the Incubator PMC members to review and vote on this incubator
> release.
> > > >
> > > > Apache Ratis is an open source Java implementation for RAFT consensus
> > > > protocol. RAFT is being used successfully as an alternative to Paxos
> to
> > > > implement a consistently replicated log. RAFT is proven to be safe
> and
> > > > is designed to be simpler to understand.
> > > >
> > > > [VOTE] Thread:
> > > >
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf942c72a3213ef43fe2aaab7268d80b09b715f1f743345025e9396a9%40%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
> > > <
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf942c72a3213ef43fe2aaab7268d80b09b715f1f743345025e9396a9@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The git tag to be voted upon:
> > > >
> > >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-1.0.0-rc0
> > > <
> > >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-1.0.0-rc0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The git commit hash:
> > > >
> > >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=f35d5e542845a7f46805706892547964c86650a5
> > > <
> > >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=f35d5e542845a7f46805706892547964c86650a5
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/1.0.0/rc0/ <
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/1.0.0/rc0/>
> > > >
> > > > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > > > 33C4 1949 16C6 A4DD A6A6  A8BF C038 41BD 42EF CC9D
> > > >
> > > > Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS <
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS>
> > > >
> > > > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > Please vote on releasing this RC.  Thank you in advance.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > > >
> > > > Starting with my +1 (non-binding).
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Lokesh Jain
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.6.0 release

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 for the GA release.

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:33 AM Mukul Kumar Singh 
wrote:

> Thanks for starting the discussion thread.
>
> How about the next release of Ratis be a GA release?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mukul
>
> On 03/06/20 12:35 pm, Lokesh Jain wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It has been a while since our last Ratis release.
> > We have around 95 commits after our latest 0.5.0 release.
> >
> > How about we start the process for a new Ratis release (0.6.0)?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mukul
>

Re: Podling Ratis Report Reminder - May 2020

[Jitendra Pandey]

Dear mentors,
   The podling report for Ratis is available at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2020#ratis

Please review and approve.

Thanks
jitendra



On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 1:06 AM  wrote:

> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 20 May 2020.
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, May 06).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> meeting.
>
> Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually
> elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or
> PPMC members in your report.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> --
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> *   Your project name
> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project or necessarily of its field
> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> *   How does the podling rate their own maturity.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2020
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Note: The format of the report has changed to use markdown.
>
> Mentors
> ---
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1

[Jitendra Pandey]

Hi Justin,
   A vote was held on the dev list. Here is the archive link.
https://s.apache.org/pxcjj
Thanks for pointing out, it is good to have a reference to that on this
thread.

regards

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 9:15 PM Justin Mclean 
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Generally a VOTE is held on the dev list first and then on the incubator
> general list. I assume thesis is just the dev list vote?
>
> Thanks,
> Justin

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.4.0 rc1

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 (binding)

On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 4:02 AM Mukul Kumar Singh 
wrote:

> Hi IPMC,
>
> Apache Ratis Thirdpardy 0.4.0-rc1 vote [1] is just passed on the PPMC
> vote [2].
> Apache Ratis is an embaddable Raft implementation but this release
> artifact is only the packaging of some of the 3rd party dependencies.
>
> The git tag to be voted upon:
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis-thirdparty.git=shortlog;a=tag;h=refs/tags/0.4.0rc1
>
>
> The git commit hash:
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis-thirdparty.git;a=commit;h=681dbaaae5eb35c07f25b924c2b4b3e3256014b1
>
> The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.4.0/rc1/
>
> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
>
> A3DE 0E76 321F 176A 4E84 67A8 E01D 75D7 B364 4C48
>
> Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. (2020-04-28 16:30 IST)
>
> Please vote on releasing this RC. Thank you in advance
>
> [ ] +1 approve
>
> [ ] +0 no opinion
>
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Starting with my +1(binding).
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mukul
>
> [1]:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf1c45937c8a4c32dfd0589d20a29464a918f5a556dde5c4779aad5ad%40%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
>
>
>
> [2]:
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rcd7f4efb645e479383b386d49e31cc0d18326f13d79962043d30cb6e%40%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.5.0 rc0

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1

Downloaded source tarball
Signatures valid
Builds from source
Arithmetic example works
Works with servers restarted.


On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:13 PM Xiaoyu Yao 
wrote:

> Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,
>
> I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.5.0 rc0. The git
> tag to be voted upon:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/releases/tag/ratis-0.5.0-rc0
>
> The git commit hash:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/commit/9613940c1f68eb919a3c5ca20b05ceafbc6c6ba9
>
> The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.5.0/rc0/
>
> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> 86EAA5843D536C6AAB0A5A242A33E32176F50EF3
>
> Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours. Please vote on releasing
> this RC. Thank you in advance.
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Here is my +1.
>
> Regards,
> Xiaoyu
>

Re: Podling Ratis Report Reminder - February 2020

[Jitendra Pandey]

Report has been updated on the Wiki.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/February2020

Mentors, please review and sign off.

Thanks

On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 1:03 PM  wrote:

> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 February 2020, 10:30 am PDT.
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, February 05).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> meeting.
>
> Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually
> elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or
> PPMC members in your report.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> --
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> *   Your project name
> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project or necessarily of its field
> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> *   How does the podling rate their own maturity.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/February2020
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Note: The format of the report has changed to use markdown.
>
> Mentors
> ---
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.5.0 release

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 to release 0.5.0. Let's cut an RC.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 3:33 PM Xiaoyu Yao 
wrote:

> Trying to revive the ratis-0.5.0 release thread and prepare for the
> corresponding Ozone release.
> If you have any blocking RATIS JIRAs that need to be included in 0.5.0
> release, please let me know before EOD Friday (1/23).
>
> Thanks,
> Xiaoyu
>
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 5:55 PM Mukul Kumar Singh  >
> wrote:
>
> > Hey Xiaoyu,
> >
> > As part of the earlier thread for 0.5.0, I had raised a concern for
> > update of grpc and protobuf version in Ratis.
> >
> > That change is now merged into Ratis and we are good to roll out a new
> > release(0.5.0).
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mukul
> >
> >
> > On 09/12/19 11:27 pm, Xiaoyu Yao wrote:
> > > @Mukul Kumar Singh , we plan to have an Ozone
> > release
> > > that depends on the fixes from Ratis 0.5.0. Do you have any update on
> > Ratis
> > > 0.5.0 release?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Xiaoyu
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 8:50 PM Mukul Kumar Singh <
> > mksingh.apa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Ratis thirdparty is now updated via RATIS-752.
> > >>
> > >> We can rollout a new Ratis release.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Mukul
> > >>
> > >> On 30/10/19 3:28 am, Anu Engineer wrote:
> > >>> +1, for the release. Thanks for driving this.
> > >>>
> > >>> -- Anu
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 12:22 PM Tsz Wo Sze 
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Thanks everyone.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> RATIS-407 is now committed.  Please let me know if there are
> specific
> > >>>> issues you like to include.  Otherwise, will roll a release later
> this
> > >>>> week or early next week.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Tsz-Wo
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:19 PM Xiaoyu Yao
>  > >
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> +1. Thanks for fixing those critical issues after 0.4.0.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Xiaoyu
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 11:04 AM Andy Wu 
> > wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1. Since 0.4.0 is not usable, a release of 0.5.0 asap will be
> > greatly
> > >>>>>> appreciated. Let me know if I can help in any way.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:03 PM Mukul Kumar Singh <
> > >>>>>> mksingh.apa...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Lets also get https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-407 in
> > for
> > >>>>>>> 0.5.0 as well.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Mukul
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On 25/10/19 3:31 am, Jitendra Pandey wrote:
> > >>>>>>>> +1, we have made several fixes and improvements as well.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze 
> > >>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> Hi Ratis Dev,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> As reported by Henrik Hegardt and Andy Wu, Ratis 0.4.0 release
> > >>>> has a
> > >>>>>>>>> NoClassDefFoundError:
> > >>>>>>>>> org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/lib/DefaultMetricsSystem problem.
> > >>>>>>>>> Therefore, we suggest rolling out 0.5.0 release as soon as
> > >>>> possible.
> > >>>>>>>>> Any thought?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Tsz-Wo
> > >>>>>>>>>
> >
>

Re: Podling Ratis Report Reminder - November 2019

[Jitendra Pandey]

Report has been updated on the Wiki.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/November2019

Mentors, please review and sign off.

Thanks

On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 12:53 PM Justin Mclean  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Just a friendly reminder that this is due in a couple of days and I don't
> see any progress on it. It's best to work on the report in the open before
> it is due.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.3.0 rc0

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 (binding)
Looks good to me. Validated signatures.

On Fri, Nov 1, 2019 at 2:38 PM Josh Elser  wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> The RC looks good to me. Great work, Mukul!
>
> On 10/30/19 11:00 PM, Mukul Kumar Singh wrote:
> > Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,
> >
> > I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis Thirdparty incubating Release 0.3.0
> > rc0
> > This is after the discuss thread for Ratis Thirdparty release. The
> > discuss thread can be
> > foundhttps://
> lists.apache.org/thread.html/3b830e7a4a4fce09cb924e4e18225f3970b277efcc860dcd8e81ba4b@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
> >
> >
> >
> > The git tag to be voted upon:
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis-thirdparty.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/ratis-thirdparty-0.3.0
> >
> >
> > The git commit hash:
> >
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis-thirdparty.git;a=commit;h=b49a8f78ecd23dc45e3eab0b858085d0bb91cec0
> >
> >
> > The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.3.0/rc0/
> >
> >
> > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > A3DE 0E76 321F 176A 4E84  67A8 E01D 75D7 B364 4C48
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS
> >
> > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > Please vote on releasing this RC.  Thank you in advance.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Starting with my +1(binding).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mukul Kumar Singh
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.3.0 Ratis Thirdparty release

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 let's put out an RC for voting.

On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 9:22 PM Dinesh Chitlangia
 wrote:

> +1
>
> -Dinesh
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 1:51 AM Lokesh Jain 
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > > On 31-Oct-2019, at 5:41 AM, Uma gangumalla 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Uma
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 4:59 AM Mukul Kumar Singh <
> > mksingh.apa...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Ratis Dev,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> With the discussion of Ratis 0.5.0 release in progress.
> > >> With Ratis-407 committed, a new thirdparty release is needed.
> > >>
> > >> This thread discusses a new ratis-thirdparty release so that grpc and
> > >> protobuf and netty versions can be updated in Ratis.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Mukul
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.5.0 release

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1, we have made several fixes and improvements as well.

On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 2:58 PM Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:

> Hi Ratis Dev,
>
> As reported by Henrik Hegardt and Andy Wu, Ratis 0.4.0 release has a
> NoClassDefFoundError:
> org/apache/hadoop/metrics2/lib/DefaultMetricsSystem problem.
> Therefore, we suggest rolling out 0.5.0 release as soon as possible.
> Any thought?
>
> Tsz-Wo
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc4

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 (binding)

Signatures - OK
Built from source - OK
Ran filestore loadgen - OK

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 8:41 PM Mukul Kumar Singh 
wrote:

> Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,
>
> I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc4.
> This is with respect to the discuss mailthread  <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/781fb6db8fe3327683f96b880496cf4b297f8666a2fab85c413c6f4b@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
> >.
>
> This vote is after fixing RATIS-668.
>
> The git tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.4.0-rc4
>
> The git commit hash:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=67ba9cd875f72705d4177e72db7bc8df5539a91c
>
> The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.4.0/rc4/
>
> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> A3DE 0E76 321F 176A 4E84  67A8 E01D 75D7 B364 4C48
>
> Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> Please vote on releasing this RC.  Thank you in advance.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Starting with my +1.
>
> Regards,
> Mukul Kumar Singh
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc3

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 (binding)

Validates signature,
Downloaded and built the source.
Ran filestore loadgen example.





On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 4:13 AM Mukul Kumar Singh 
wrote:

> Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,
>
> I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc3.
> This vote is after fixing issuesRATIS-658  in the rc2 vote.
>
> This is with respect to the discuss mailthread  <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/781fb6db8fe3327683f96b880496cf4b297f8666a2fab85c413c6f4b@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
> >.
>
> The git tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/0.4.0-rc3
> <
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.4.0-rc2
> >
>
> The git commit hash:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=f401c7a3d21ba2ce6fc735891ae9e22ea5628c8d
> <
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=2739b4e42399b6a47f79c7b4bc7b23ca77702896
> >
>
> The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~msingh/0.4.0-rc3/  <
> http://people.apache.org/~msingh/0.4.0-rc2/>
>
> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> 45B0 13F6 29C6 89CC 6EE3 77B0 8D43 C3D9 A8F1 02BD
>
> Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS  <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS>
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> Please vote on releasing this RC.  Thank you in advance.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Starting with my +1.
> Built Ozone from source and was able to run the examples.
>
> Regards,
> Mukul Kumar Singh
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc2

[Jitendra Pandey]

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-658 blocks this.


A new RC needed.

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:28 PM Mukul Kumar Singh 
wrote:

> Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,
>
> I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.4.0 rc2.
> This vote is after fixing issues RATIS-653 & RATIS-654 in the rc1 vote.
>
> This is with respect to the discuss mailthread  <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/781fb6db8fe3327683f96b880496cf4b297f8666a2fab85c413c6f4b@%3Cdev.ratis.apache.org%3E
> >.
>
> The git tag to be voted upon:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.4.0-rc2
>
> The git commit hash:
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=2739b4e42399b6a47f79c7b4bc7b23ca77702896
>
> The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
> http://people.apache.org/~msingh/0.4.0-rc2/
>
> The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> 45B0 13F6 29C6 89CC 6EE3 77B0 8D43 C3D9 A8F1 02BD
>
> Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS  <
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS>
>
> This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> Please vote on releasing this RC.  Thank you in advance.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Starting with my +1.
>
> Regards,
> Mukul Kumar Singh
>
>

Re: Podling Report Reminder - May 2019

[Jitendra Pandey]

Report has been updated on the Wiki.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/May2019

Mentors, please sign off.

Thanks
jitendra



On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:22 PM  wrote:

> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your quarterly board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 May 2019, 10:30 am PDT.
> The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
> report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
> before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
> submission (Wed, May 01).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
> PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
> very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
> meeting.
>
> Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually
> elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or
> PPMC members in your report.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
>
> --
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> *   Your project name
> *   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project or necessarily of its field
> *   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards graduation.
> *   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> *   How has the community developed since the last report
> *   How has the project developed since the last report.
> *   How does the podling rate their own maturity.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/INCUBATOR/May2019
>
> Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is created from a template.
>
> Mentors
> ---
>
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
> following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
> for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc2

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1

Verified checksums
Built from source
Ran filestore loadgen.

On 4/9/19, 12:33 AM, "Tsz Wo Sze"  wrote:

Hi Apache Ratis PPMC,

I am calling a vote for Apache Ratis incubating Release 0.3.0 rc2.

The git tag to be voted upon:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git=shortlog;h=refs/tags/ratis-0.3.0rc2

The git commit hash:

https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-ratis.git;a=commit;h=b4bbd600f5bb1d5860cbdd8cf36ae63feedc87f9

The source and binary tarballs can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.3.0/rc2/

The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
2C33 A9CB 66AE AD59 3183  B01B 7843 4EF4 60D6 914B

Release artifacts are signed with one of the keys available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS

This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Please vote on releasing this RC.  Thank you in advance.

[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)

Obviously, I am +1.

Regards,
Tsz-Wo

Re: Ratis Features

[Jitendra Pandey]

Hi Karim,
  Thanks for your interest in Apache Ratis. I have added you to Slack
channel.
These functionalities have been implemented, but configuration management
and snapshots are not fully tested.
It is expected that there would be more work in these areas as they get
tested and stabilized.
Performance and failure handling are some of the active areas of work
currently. For example, how ratis behaves with faulty network or disks.
Any work in this area would be a great help. If you are interested in
performance or failure handling, let us know we can discuss further.

Thanks
jitendra





On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:15 AM Karim Sonbol  wrote:

> Dear Ratis team,
>
> I would like to know if all of Raft features are implemented in Ratis 0.2.0
> release, specifically log replication, leader election, live membership
> changes (configuration management), and log compaction (snapshots). Also, I
> would like to be added to the Slack channel if possible since I will be
> extending Ratis for my research.
>
> Thank you very much,
> Karim Sonbol
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 I would suggest we should cut a release candidate once following 3 are
included:
RATIS-503, RATIS-506 and RATIS-490, however RATIS-490 is not a blocker in
my opinion.

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 5:47 AM Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:

> How about we roll a 0.3.0 release from branch-0.3?  Please let me know
> if there are specific JIRAs we should include in 0.3.0.  Thanks.
>
> Tsz-Wo
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:19 PM Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:
> >
> > I just have re-created branch-0.3.  If you already have branch-0.3
> > locally, "git pull" should be able to update all the changes.  Thanks.
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Mukul Kumar Singh
> >  wrote:
> > >
> > > +1,
> > >
> > > On 3/20/19, 9:20 PM, "Jitendra Pandey"  wrote:
> > >
> > > > I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create
> the 0.3
> > > branch).
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal
> 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze 
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > > > > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow.  Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tsz-Wo
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey <
> jiten...@hortonworks.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> +1
> > > > >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in
> 0.3 as
> > > > well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current
> trunk.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze"  wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Hi Marton,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>For Ozone, it probably needs trunk.  How about we move
> everything in
> > > > >>trunk to 0.3?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>Tsz-Wo
> > > > >>
> > > > >>On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton <
> e...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Any comment on this?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks,
> > > > >>> Marton
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > > > >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone
> release.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > > >>>> Marton
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> > > > >>>>> Hi,
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release.  How about
> we start
> > > > >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0.
> Then, we can
> > > > >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

[Jitendra Pandey]

> I will merge everything in master to branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3
branch).

+1

On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 7:58 AM Arpit Agarwal 
wrote:

> +1 for rebasing 0.3 to trunk.
>
>
> > On Mar 20, 2019, at 2:37 AM, Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:
> >
> > If there is no objection, I will merge everything in master to
> > branch-0.3 (or re-create the 0.3 branch) tomorrow.  Thanks.
> >
> > Tsz-Wo
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 6:54 AM Jitendra Pandey 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >> There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as
> well. Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.
> >>
> >> On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze"  wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi Marton,
> >>
> >>For Ozone, it probably needs trunk.  How about we move everything in
> >>trunk to 0.3?
> >>
> >>Tsz-Wo
> >>
> >>On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Any comment on this?
> >>>
> >>> What is the plan with the next release?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Marton
> >>>
> >>> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> >>>> Bumping up this thread.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
> >>>>
> >>>> As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> >>>>
> >>>> What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> >>>>
> >>>> Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Marton
> >>>>
> >>>> On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release.  How about we start
> >>>>> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0.  Then, we can
> >>>>> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Tsz-Wo
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Ratis 0.3.0 release

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1
There have been many fixes in trunk lately that need to be in 0.3 as well. 
Therefore, it makes sense to rebase 0.3 to the current trunk.

On 2/28/19, 2:49 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze"  wrote:

Hi Marton,

For Ozone, it probably needs trunk.  How about we move everything in
trunk to 0.3?

Tsz-Wo

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 6:59 AM Elek, Marton  wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Any comment on this?
>
> What is the plan with the next release?
>
> Thanks,
> Marton
>
> On 2/6/19 11:21 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> > Bumping up this thread.
> >
> > I would like to use stable ratis release for the next ozone release.
> >
> > As I see branch-0.3 contains only RATIS-430.
> >
> > What is the current plan of releasing 0.3.0?
> >
> > Can we release branch-0.3 as is?
> >
> > Do we need to rebase branch-0.3 on top of the latest master?
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marton
> >
> > On 11/12/18 9:37 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> We have around 80 commits after 0.2.0 release.  How about we start
> >> preparing Ratis 0.3.0 release?
> >>
> >> We may create a 0.3.0 branch and change trunk to 0.4.0.  Then, we can
> >> stabilize 0.3.0 before starting a vote.
> >>
> >> Tsz-Wo
> >>

Re: Ratis Log Verifier?

[Jitendra Pandey]

Hi Clay,
  By Log verification you mean correctly formatted, or a tool that can
compare the logs of two replicas to verify they are same?


On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 7:17 PM Clay B.  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Does anyone have a Ratis log verification tool or can think of a class I
> can repurpose for one? (I was thinking perhaps from Ratis doing its log
> replication?)
>
> In working on RATIS-463 which provides running the file based load
> generator and fuzzing for disk issues, I often see logs are not replicated
> across all servers for a bit and want to ensure they are always in sync
> (easy with the trivial file generator test at least) so I have been using
> checksums and ugly shell scripts.
>
> Before looking into something more, I wanted to see if there was something
> I could use or build on? And I figure this might be good for other
> operators to gain trust Ratis is indeed working too.
>
> -Clay
>

Re: Ratis Podling report for Feb-2019

[Jitendra Pandey]

That’s a good suggestion.
 I have updated the report with following additions:

=
 2018-12-05: Rajeshbabu Chintaguntla added as a committer.
 2018-12-10: Sergey Soldatov added as a committer.
 2018-12-26: Vladimir Rodionov added as a committer.
==

On 2/6/19, 8:56 AM, "Josh Elser"  wrote:

Would it help to break down the last committers/PMC added rather than a 
single date? I'm guessing we don't have quick access to that information 
like a TLP does (e.g. via reporter.a.o)

On 2/5/19 5:22 PM, Jitendra Pandey wrote:
> Here is the draft report for Apache Ratis for Feb-2019.
> 
> Please review and provide feedback. Mentors please signoff if it looks ok.
> 
> Link:  https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2019
> 
> Pasted below:
> 
> 
> Ratis
> 
> Ratis is a java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol
> 
> Ratis has been incubating since 2017-01-03.
> 
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
> 
>1. Have a GA release.
>2. Complete graduation template.
>3. Need name search.
> 
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
> 
> None
> 
> How has the community developed since the last report?
> 
>5 new contributors have been added. Total 58 contributors currently.
>20 committers.
> 
> How has the project developed since the last report?
>50 new patches committed.
>Active work on multiple projects.
> 
> How would you assess the podling's maturity?
> Please feel free to add your own commentary.
> 
>[X] Initial setup
>[X] Working towards first release
>[X] Community building
>[X] Nearing graduation
> 
> Date of last release:
> 
>2018-08-15: Ratis-0.2.0
>2018-12-06: Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0
>2019-01-31: Last snapshot release
> 
> When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
> 
>   2018-11-03
> 
> Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling
> through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues
> that need to be addressed.
> 
> Mentors have been helpful.
>   
> 

Ratis Podling report for Feb-2019

[Jitendra Pandey]

Here is the draft report for Apache Ratis for Feb-2019.

Please review and provide feedback. Mentors please signoff if it looks ok.

Link:  https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2019

Pasted below:


Ratis

Ratis is a java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol

Ratis has been incubating since 2017-01-03.

Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:

  1. Have a GA release.
  2. Complete graduation template.
  3. Need name search.

Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
aware of?

None

How has the community developed since the last report?

  5 new contributors have been added. Total 58 contributors currently.
  20 committers.

How has the project developed since the last report?
  50 new patches committed.
  Active work on multiple projects.

How would you assess the podling's maturity?
Please feel free to add your own commentary.

  [X] Initial setup
  [X] Working towards first release
  [X] Community building
  [X] Nearing graduation

Date of last release:

  2018-08-15: Ratis-0.2.0
  2018-12-06: Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0
  2019-01-31: Last snapshot release

When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?

 2018-11-03

Have your mentors been helpful and responsive or are things falling
through the cracks? In the latter case, please list any open issues
that need to be addressed.

Mentors have been helpful.
 

Re: Incubator Podling Report (Due 6th February)

[Jitendra Pandey]

Hi Justin, 
   We are working on the report. We will have it ready by 6th.

Thanks
jitendra

On 2/2/19, 9:22 PM, "Justin Mclean"  wrote:

Hi,

Can someone please confirm the the PPMC is working on the report for this 
month as I don't see any activity on list about it. It's due in a few days.

Thanks,
Justin

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0 rc0

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1 (binding)
verified checksums, can build from source.

On 12/3/18, 9:46 AM, "Josh Elser"  wrote:

Thanks for voting, Marton!

PPMC, any chance to throw some quick votes on here for a very small 
change over the previous release? :)

On 12/3/18 11:19 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> 
> Checked:
>   * Signature: OK
>   * Checksum: OK
>   * DISCLAIMER/LICENSE/NOTICE: OK
>   * can build from the source: OK
> 
> I also patched the Hadoop/Ozone trunk to use 0.2.0 from the staged
> repository, created a full build and executed the full smoketest suite.
> All passed.
> 
> Looks good to me, thanks to create it, Josh.
> 
> Marton
> 
> On 11/30/18 9:33 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please on the following as Ratis Thirdparty 0.2.0:
>>
>> The release artifact (in source form only) is found at:
>>
>> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.2.0-rc0/ratis-thirdparty-0.2.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>>
>>
>> SHA512 checksum is:
>>
>> D9D87B40 170A3DF6 07538DC5 E6BDF6D3 D93CE7EA DDCC9C7F A077EB99 664C704D
>> 412E54DC 6C402A3A 67C9B5EF 959272FE 953D8189 68613802 BABF3C6A 621887CA
>>
>> The signature (and all files) can be found here:
>> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.2.0-rc0/
>>
>>
>> The SHA1 for the corresponding commit in Git is:
>> 754f0c730eda3dc5f1b90bed0669ca86d5262747
>>
>> There is only one change in 0.2.0 (over 0.1.0) is including the Netty
>> native libraries. Thus, there is no other functional change over the
>> 0.1.0 release.
>>
>> For testing with downstream components, you may use the Maven staging
>> repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1009/
>>
>> Here's my +1 (binding)
>>
>> This will be open for at least 72 hours (2018/12/03 2000 GMT).
>>
>> - Josh

Re: [DISCUSS] Next thirdparty release?

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1, always good to release frequently.
Since the jira is already marked for fixed version
"thirdparty-0.2.0", 0.2.0 looks is fine.

On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 2:04 PM Josh Elser  wrote:

> I've just committed some good work by Xiaoyu to re-add the
> netty-tcnative stuff into the thirdparty repo (this was dropped as a
> part of the switch but we had no testing to catch that) via
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-383
>
> To keep Ozone rolling, we should start thinking about spinning another
> quick thirdparty release. Should be extremely painless this time. I'm
> happy to RM it.
>
> Two questions:
>
> 1. Any other fixes we need in thirdparty that folks have noticed?
> 2. What version should we call it? 0.1.1 or 0.2.0?
>
> Thank in advance.
>
> - Josh
>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc1

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1,
 verified signatures, LICENSE and NOTICE files are present.

 NOTICE, and LICENSE files, however, do not include copyrights of dependencies. 
 We should plan to address that, if required, in next release.

On 11/5/18, 9:54 AM, "Ted Yu"  wrote:

+1

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 10:51 PM Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:

> +1
>
> - Verified the signature and checksums.
> - Checked LICENSE, NOTICE and NOTICE in the gz and the jar files
> - Checked file names -- all file in
>
> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.1.0-rc1/
> have "incubating".
>
> Thanks a lot, Josh!
> Tsz-Wo
>
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 2:20 AM Josh Elser  wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please vote on the following release candidate to become Apache Ratis
> > Thirdparty 0.1.0.
> >
> > The Apache Ratis Thirdparty project is a collection of all thirdparty
> > dependencies that Apache Ratis uses, repackaged for optimal use by
> > Ratis. As such, there is very little net-new source code in this 
project.
> >
> > Over rc0, this RC does:
> >
> > * Incubating in the file name
> > * make_rc.sh updates
> > * Includes a DISCLAIMER in generated jar files
> > * renames ratis-thirdparty to ratis-thirdparty-misc (not yet reflected
> > in ratis.git)
> >
> > The source release is present at
> >
> 
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/thirdparty/0.1.0-rc1/
> >
> > SHA512 checksum is on the source tarball: 2B11B643 836E367E C47D0F64
> > 7750E1AB DE2C3FDE ECF2C825 5F8292FA D4CF2DB4 04BEB4B6
> >   12173754 4C6ACEEE B8534964 C6A4B690 EA9656E2 CAFDB317 FAAB46BA
> >
> > This source release was created from the Git commit SHA1:
> > 896f7b3453e155df96b8ef62b85aa0b92c37d886. For your convenience, there
> > is also a GPG-signed tag with the name "ratis-thirdparty-0.1.0rc1" that
> > also points at this commit.
> >
> > This source release was signed with my key: 4677D66C. This is present
> > in the KEYS file (dist/dev and dist/release).
> >
> > The corresponding "binaries" for this release are staged at
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1008/
> and
> > will be promoted pending successful PPMC and IPMC votes. You can
> > update your local ~/.m2/settings.xml to add this as a repository to
> > test the build of ratis.git if you choose (appears to work fine for me).
> >
> > This vote will be open for at least 72hours (until 2018/11/03 19:00:00
> > GMT).
> >
> > --
> >
> > Here's my +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > - Josh
>

Re: Publishing Ratis snapshot (was Re: [VOTE] Apache Ratis Thirdparty 0.1.0rc0)

[Jitendra Pandey]

RATIS-348 is committed, so we are good to push new snapshot for this ozone 
blocker.

On 10/11/18, 11:59 AM, "Josh Elser"  wrote:

(pulling this out the vote thread to avoid confusion)

No problem, Anu. Happy to push a SNAPSHOT build of Ratis.

On 10/11/18 2:56 PM, Anu Engineer wrote:
> Would it be possible to do a full Ratis snap-shot release? So, we can 
just consume all the changes with a single update on ozone side.
> Sorry, I am just being a little selfish here, but it makes ozone’s life 
little easier. Otherwise we will have to follow up with another release.
> 
> --Anu
> 
> 
> On 10/11/18, 11:44 AM, "Josh Elser"  wrote:
> 
>  Hey Anu,
>  
>  No need for me to wait around. This is just for the new thirdparty 
repo
>  -- not a release of ratis itself :)
>  
>  On 10/11/18 2:31 PM, Anu Engineer wrote:
>  > Hi Josh,
>  >
>  > Can you please include Ratis-348?, it fixes a critical issue for 
Ozone. You might have to wait until the end of day to roll the build.
>  >
>  > Thanks
>  > Anu
>  >
>  >
>  > On 10/11/18, 11:26 AM, "Josh Elser"  wrote:
>  >
>  >  The only thing that the ASF releases is source code, 
therefore the
>  >  policy you're quoting isn't relevant. There is no requirement 
to vote on
>  >  binary artifacts that are created from that source release. 
The
>  >  obligation on us is to verify that anything else the source 
release
>  >  creates follows ASF licensing like the source release does 
(e.g. our
>  >  JARs contain appropriate L files).
>  >
>  >  You are right about incubating in the filename though -- 
totally forgot
>  >  about that requirement. Let me roll an rc1 with that.
>  >
>  >  Thanks for catching that!
>  >
>  >  On 10/11/18 11:23 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>  >  >> I don't see any value for that, tbh. ...
>  >  >
>  >  > I agree that no one is going to download and use the 
binary.  However,
>  >  > it is an artifact which we can vote for.  It seems ASF 
requires us to
>  >  > put this artifact in the distribution directory, which is a
>  >  > subdirectory of www.apache.org/dist/ according to
>  >  > 
http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#where-do-releases-go
>  >  >
>  >  > BTW, just found the following from
>  >  > https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#releases
>  >  > - the release archive MUST contain the word "incubating" in 
the filename; and
>  >  > - the release archive MUST contain an Incubation disclaimer 
(as
>  >  > described in the previous section), clearly visible in the 
main
>  >  > documentation or README file.
>  >  >
>  >  > We don't have "incubating" in the rc0 filename and 
DISCLAIMER seems
>  >  > missing in the binary jars in
>  >  > 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1007/
>  >  >
>  >  > I guess we need a rc1?
>  >  >
>  >  > Tsz-Wo
>  >  > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:43 PM Josh Elser 
 wrote:
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Thanks for the vote, Nicholas!
>  >  >>
>  >  >> On 10/10/18 10:43 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>  >  >>   > - untar and then "mvn install" does work for me.  It 
won't work if we
>  >  >>   > run a second "mvn install" without clean.  "mvn 
install" works again
>  >  >>   > after "mvn clean".  It seems not a problem.
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Will have to investigate what's going on.
>  >  >>
>  >  >>> Questions:
>  >  >>> - Should we post a rc for the binary?
>  >  >>
>  >  >> I don't see any value for that, tbh. 99% of people are not 
going to know
>  >  >> this even exists and will get it via Maven. In another 
line of thinking,
>  >  >> the Maven repository I sent out "is" the binary release :)
>  >  >>
>  >  >>> - Now the project name becomes "Apache Ratis Thirdparty 
Parent" (and
>  >  >>> the gz file name) instead of "Apache Ratis Thirdparty".  
It is a
>  >  >>> little odd.  How about using "Apache Ratis Thirdparty" 
for the root
>  >  >>> module and "Apache Ratis Thirdparty Shaded" for the 
sub-module?  I am
>  >  >>> fine if we do the rename later.
>  >  >>
>  >  >> More than happy to revisit naming later on :). I wasn't 
able to come up
>  >  >> with a good name for our general Ratis dependencies 
module. 

Ratis Podling report for August.

[Jitendra Pandey]

Dear all,
   I have updated the podling report for Ratis for the month of August at

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/August2018

The text is pasted below

BEGIN=

Ratis

Ratis is a java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol

Ratis has been incubating since 2017-01-03.

Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:

  1. Work towards a GA release.
  2. Establish a release cadence.
  3. More committers, PPMC members.

Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
aware of?

None

How has the community developed since the last report?

7 new contributors have been added. Total 50 contributors currently.
2 new committers have been added. Total 20 committers currently.

How has the project developed since the last report?

Ratis-0.2.0 release was made available on 15-July-2018.
18 new commits.
Apache HBase community members have shown interest in using Ratis for WAL.

How would you assess the podling's maturity?
Please feel free to add your own commentary.

  [X] Initial setup : Mostly done, some improvements to pre-commit, nightly 
processes needed.
  [ ] Working towards first release : 0.2.0 release done recently, planning 
started for a GA release.
  [ ] Community building : New contributors and committers are being added. 
More users are showing interest.
  [ ] Nearing graduation : GA release, and community diversity are needed.
  [ ] Other:

Date of last release:

  2018-07-15

When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?

  2018-07-18

END===

Re: [DISCUSS] Distributed Log "LogService" proposal

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1

On 7/13/18, 1:22 PM, "Josh Elser"  wrote:

Hi all,

I'd like to share a document that I've been working on for many months 
with Jitendra about building a distributed-log "recipe" on top of Ratis.


https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Su5py_T5Ytfh9RoTTX2s20KbSJwBHVxbO7ge5ORqbCk/edit?usp=sharing

The primary use case is for Apache HBase, replacing its HDFS-backed 
write-ahead log construct with something a bit more flexible. Our hope 
is that by building a distributed log with Ratis, HBase could observe 
similar levels of performance as we do with HDFS and better enable our 
flexibility to run on "dynamic" cloud IaaS platforms.

At the bottom of that document, you'll find a high level breakdown of 
work items for both Ratis as well as HBase. My hope is that both of 
these will be able to be worked on concurrently. Furthermore, while 
HBase is a primary "customer" for the work, I hope that you would find a 
DistributedLog recipe for Ratis (what we've been calling the 
"LogService") generally reusable for the Ratis community.

Please let me know what you think (either on the mailing list or via 
comments on the google-doc). Thanks!

- Josh

Re: Guideline to contribute to Ratis

[Jitendra Pandey]

The open issues are at following link. You can take up any issue that is not 
assigned, or if not being actively worked upon. Just state your interest on the 
jira that you would want to take that up.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20RATIS%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20%22Patch%20Available%22)

http://ratis.apache.org/

There is a hipchat channel as well
https://www.hipchat.com/gldZkUal7

jitendra

From: Chushen Tan 
Date: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 at 12:18 PM
To: "dev-ow...@ratis.incubator.apache.org" 

Subject: Guideline to contribute to Ratis


Hi



I am Jonas. I am new contributor for Ratis. So far, I do not see any clear 
tasks on your account. Could you provide a guideline about where I could find 
issues to solve, your current progress, and how to submit my code. Thank you.



Best

Jonas

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc2)​

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1

Verified the signatures
Downloaded the source and built 
Ran the arithmetic example.


On 6/28/18, 9:13 AM, "Elek, Marton"  wrote:


Hi all,

I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0.

Both the licensing problem and the naming problem are fixed since the 
last rc.

All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:

https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.2.0/rc2

Staged artifacts can be found at:

https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1005

This release has been signed with PGP key 0EE79B28, corresponding to
e...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file 
(https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS).

This key can be found on keyservers, such as:

http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x0EE79B28

Or in the apache phonebook:

https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/elek.asc


The release candidate has been tagged in git with ratis-0.2.0-rc2 (4d14160)

https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/releases/tag/ratis-0.2.0-rc2



Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

If the vote passed, the second stage vote will be called on the Apache 
incubator mailing list to get approval from the Incubator PMC.



  # Review/testing

You can check the usual requirements of an apache release on the ASF site:

  • Signatures (Please note that bin and src have different 
LICENSE/NOTICE, just with the required licenses)
  • Checksums
  • License and notice files
  • Disclaimer file (incubator!)
  • Build the project from the source code package (mvn clean install 
assembly:single -DskipTests=true )
  • Licence headers

The binary papckage can be smoketested with:

./examples/bin/start-all.sh
./examples/bin/client.sh assign --name a --value 2
./examples/bin/client.sh get --name a



Starting with my vote: +1

Thanks,
Marton

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Ratis (incubating) 0.2.0 (rc1)​

[Jitendra Pandey]

Moving my vote to the right thread.

+1
Downloaded the source, verified signatures and ran some unit tests.

On 5/21/18, 3:09 PM, "Venkat"  wrote:

+1

Checked sigatures/hashes.The archive name does not have  apache
prefix -  already raised in this vote thread.

Built and ran tests - there were some timeouts running ratis servers
tests in a couple of runs (could be environmental issues) ,  but all
tests passed in a subsequent execution.   .

Venkat

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Jakob Homan  wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * Checked sigs/hash
> * Spot checked tests
> * Checked on the copyright year (thanks)
> * Built per instructions, which worked this time.
>
> Nit:
> * Didn't notice this last time, but the artifacts should
> apache-ratis-incubator-0.2.0-src.tar.gz rather than
> ratis-incubator-0.2.0-src.tar.gz.  The IPMC will likely let this slide
> until the next release.
>
> -Jakob
>
>
> On 18 May 2018 at 11:20, Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:
>> Thanks Marton.
>>
>> We can generate mds by "gpg --print-mds ".  See also
>> ratis/dev-support/make_rc.sh
>>
>> Tsz-Wo
>>
>> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 5:49 AM, Elek, Marton  wrote:
>>> I just found (thanks to RATIS-241) that the previous release provided 
mds
>>> files as checksum. So I just added mds files as well (you can see that 
the
>>> sha hash is the same).
>>>
>>> But as I don't know any easy method to verify the mds files [1] I would 
link
>>> the sha-512 from the ratis web page.
>>>
>>> Please check the release candidate and vote.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Marton
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> 
https://superuser.com/questions/1117048/how-to-verify-checksum-in-a-mds-file-format
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/16/2018 11:50 PM, Elek, Marton wrote:


 Hi all,

 I'd like to restart the vote to release Apache Ratis (incubating) 
0.2.0 as
 we fixed all the previously discussed issues.



 This is the second incubator release and it includes more than 120
 improvements and fixes since the previous 0.1.0-alpha release. This is 
the
 first release
 which includes a binary package with ready to use example project.

 All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
 found at:

 https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.2.0/rc1

 Staged artifacts can be found at:

 https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1004


 This release has been signed with PGP key 0EE79B28, corresponding to
 e...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file
 (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS).

 This key can be found on keyservers, such as:

 http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x0EE79B28

 Or in the apache phonebook:

 https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/elek.asc


 The release candidate has been tagged in git with ratis-0.2.0-rc1
 (bd234f25c29e918ad3db88bfedcc2d6931221a3e)

 https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/releases/tag/ratis-0.2.0-rc1



 Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.

 If the vote passed, the second stage vote will be called on the Apache
 incubator mailing list to get approval from the Incubator PMC.



   # Review/testing

 You can check the usual requirements of an apache release:

   • Signatures
   • Checksums
   • License and notice files
   • Disclaimer file (incubator!)
   • Build the project from the source code package (mvn clean install
 assembly:single -DskipTests=true )
   • Licence headers

 The binary papckage can be smoketested with:

 ./examples/bin/start-all.sh
 ./examples/bin/client.sh assign --name a --value 2
 ./examples/bin/client.sh get --name a



 Starting with my vote: +1

 Thanks,
 Marton

Re: RC1: Call for vote

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1
Downloaded the source, verified signatures and ran some unit tests.

On 5/21/18, 11:14 AM, "Tsz Wo Sze"  wrote:

+1
I have verified all checksums and signatures and run some manual tests
with the examples.  Everything looks good.  Thanks, Marton!

Tsz-Wo

On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Mukul Kumar Singh
 wrote:
> Thanks for creating a new release Marton.
>
> +1
> Tested Ozone with latest ratis and ran data I/O operation using Freon.
>
> Thanks,
> Mukul
>
> On 21/05/18, 8:18 PM, "Elek, Marton"  wrote:
>
> I extend the deadline of the vote. Kindly ask to check the package and
> vote if you have time.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.2.0/rc1/
>
> Marton
>
> On 05/16/2018 11:50 PM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to restart the vote to release Apache Ratis (incubating) 
0.2.0
> > as we fixed all the previously discussed issues.
> >
> >
> >
> > This is the second incubator release and it includes more than 120
> > improvements and fixes since the previous 0.1.0-alpha release. This 
is
> > the first release
> > which includes a binary package with ready to use example project.
> >
> > All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can 
be
> > found at:
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/0.2.0/rc1
> >
> > Staged artifacts can be found at:
> >
> > 
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheratis-1004
> >
> >
> > This release has been signed with PGP key 0EE79B28, corresponding to
> > e...@apache.org, which is included in the repository's KEYS file
> > (https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ratis/KEYS).
> >
> > This key can be found on keyservers, such as:
> >
> > http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x0EE79B28
> >
> > Or in the apache phonebook:
> >
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/elek.asc
> >
> >
> > The release candidate has been tagged in git with ratis-0.2.0-rc1
> > (bd234f25c29e918ad3db88bfedcc2d6931221a3e)
> >
> > 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ratis/releases/tag/ratis-0.2.0-rc1
> >
> >
> >
> > Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > If the vote passed, the second stage vote will be called on the 
Apache
> > incubator mailing list to get approval from the Incubator PMC.
> >
> >
> >
> >   # Review/testing
> >
> > You can check the usual requirements of an apache release:
> >
> >   • Signatures
> >   • Checksums
> >   • License and notice files
> >   • Disclaimer file (incubator!)
> >   • Build the project from the source code package (mvn clean 
install
> > assembly:single -DskipTests=true )
> >   • Licence headers
> >
> > The binary papckage can be smoketested with:
> >
> > ./examples/bin/start-all.sh
> > ./examples/bin/client.sh assign --name a --value 2
> > ./examples/bin/client.sh get --name a
> >
> >
> >
> > Starting with my vote: +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Marton
>
>
>

Re: 0.2.0 release?

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1

On 5/4/18, 8:15 AM, "Elek, Marton"  wrote:

Sounds great,

Thank you very much the work Tsz-Wo, Kit Hui, Lokesh. There is no more 
blocker in the jira.

If no objections I will create the release candidate at the weekend and 
start the release vote.

Thanks,
Marton

On 05/01/2018 08:28 PM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> Marton,
> 
> Thanks for tracking the issues.  All RATIS-227, RATIS-228 and
> RATIS-229 are new resolved and there are no more blockers.  Let's roll
> a release?
> 
> Tsz-Wo
> 
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 3:46 AM, Marton, Elek  wrote:
>> Quick update:
>>
>>
>> TLDR; We need RATIS-227/RATIS-228 (and imho RATIS-229) for the 0.2.0
>> release.
>>
>>
>>
>> Current Blocker/Patch Available jiras:
>>
>> BLOCKER:
>>
>> RATIS-227 TestRaftWithGrpc.testBasicAppendEntriesWithAllReplication fails
>> --> No patch, yet
>>
>> RATIS-228 Handle zero size log_inprogress file
>> --> Patch available, seems to be ok for me, but not enough experience 
with
>> the file writing. Please review if you have time.
>>
>> NON-BLOCKER:
>>
>> RATIS-229 GRpcLogAppender should trigger a heartbeat when appendEntries
>> Patch Available -> but "need more testing". Seems to be a real problem 
which
>> should be included, question is open about the implementation.
>>
>> RATIS-230: Improve gRPC log messages
>> Patch Available -> seems to be ok for me, checkstyle issues
>>
>> RATIS-222 Handle Error exception when Unassigned Variable is tried to 
get .
>> Patch Available --> I think it should be fixed in different location with
>> fixing the error handling of the arithmetic state machine
>>
>> RATIS-218 Optimize heartbeating in Ratis for Grpc protocol
>> --> Reviewed, response is pending
>>
>>
>> Marton
>>
>>
>> On 04/17/2018 05:35 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
>>>
>>> I agreed that RATIS-227 is a blocker.  Let me ping Kit for fixing it.
>>> Tsz-Wo
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 4:53 AM, Elek, Marton  wrote:

 Fair enough, I modified the priority of RATIS-227 to blocker. Let's see
 if
 we can get it soon.

 In the meantime I created a preview version of the release:
 https://home.apache.org/~elek/ratis-preview (NON OFFICIAL ARTIFACTS!)

 And requested reviews from the incubator mentors. Hopefully we can 
start
 a
 vote at the end of this week.

 Marton


 On 04/16/2018 05:31 PM, Lokesh Jain wrote:
>
>
> I think we can have RATIS-227 in 0.2.0 release as well. There might 
be a
> possible bug which needs to be fixed.
>
> Thanks
> Lokesh
>

>>

Re: Contributor/Committer guidelines?

[Jitendra Pandey]

Jakob,
  You are already an admin, so you should be able to add contributors. 
The guidelines are mostly inherited from Hadoop, but we need to spell them out 
explicitly.

jitendra


On 3/8/18, 5:38 PM, "Jakob Homan"  wrote:

I can't find anywhere on the site for guides for contributing and
committing to the project?  Is this documented anywhere?  I checked on
the main site and wiki.

Also, can I be added as an admin on the JIRA project so I can add new
contributor?

Thanks,
Jakob

Re: [RESULT][VOTE#2] Merge RATIS-5 to a new branch and publish the new site

[Jitendra Pandey]

Woohoo! It is beautiful. 
Thanks, Marton, for making it happen.

On 1/22/18, 1:25 AM, "Marton, Elek"  wrote:

And finally: https://ratis.incubator.apache.org/ is up and running.

The source code is at the asf-site-source branch and the html files are 
commited to the asf-site branch.

Thank you all the help,
Marton

On 01/20/2018 10:37 AM, Elek, Marton wrote:
> Thank you very much your votes.
> 
> The Vote is passed with:
> 
>   * 7 of +1 vote (thx Anu, Jitendra, Mukul, Tsz-Wo, Lokesh, Shashikant, 
> Arpit)
>   * and without -1 vote.
> 
> I will merge the source code and the rendered version to the proposed 
> branches and open the infra ticket to publish the site.
> 
> Marton
> 
> ps: I read a lot of asf policies to understand binding/non-binding in 
> case of an incubator project. Fortunately this vote is passed anyway. My 
> understanding is that for an incubator merge vote it's not needed to 
> calculate bindig/non-binding separated but any commiter could veto the 
> merge.
> 
> Anyway, thanks again the review and vote for all of you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 01/18/2018 08:12 PM, Arpit Agarwal wrote:
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On 1/15/18, 4:58 AM, "Marton, Elek"  wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>  We got valuable feedback from the incubator mailing list an 
>> improved the
>>  proposed site according to the apache guidelines.
>>  So I start a new Vote to merge it. Please have a final look to the
>>  proposed web site and VOTE if you agree to publish it.
>>  As a reminder:
>>* Rendered site is here: https://elek.github.io/ratis-site/
>>* Source is on the RATIS-5 branch
>>* both the rendered and source version is uploaded to RATIS-5.
>>  This VOTE will open for 5 days and will end of 20th of January.
>>  Thanks,
>>  Marton
>>  FTR. The original vote thread started here:
>>  
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ratis-dev/201712.mbox/browser
>>

Re: [VOTE] Merge RATIS-5 to a new branch and publish the new site

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1, Great work. Let’s merge the awesome website.

On 12/22/17, 7:06 AM, "Elek, Marton"  wrote:

Hi,

RATIS-5 feature branch contains the proposed site for 
ratis.incubator.apache.org.

The final patch is uploaded to the RATIS-5 issue [1]

This is the initial version which is created according to the Apache 
policies [2]. It uses hugo (a single binary site generator) and uses 
bootstrap based styles and contains a minimal set of content to start.

This is a formal vote request to merge RATIS-5 patch (squashed version 
of RATIS-5 branch) to a new branch (asf-site-source)  and commit the 
rendered version to another branch (asf-site). (I will ask apache infra 
to use asf-site branch as the source of the website and create jenkins 
job to regenerate site in case of source change).

Please check the site and vote. Rendered version is also attached to 
ratis-rendered.tar.gz and can be checked at 
https://elek.github.io/ratis-site/ together with the source) but please 
also check the rendering process if you can (just call hugo from the 
ratis-site directory and check the results in the public folder)

Unfortunatelly this vote is opened just a few days before christmas so
it will close no earlier than one week from today (29/12), to be sure 
everybody had the opportunity to check it and vote.

Thanks,
Marton

[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12902272/RATIS-5.003.patch

[2] 

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-5?focusedCommentId=16275030=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16275030

Re: ratis web page

[Jitendra Pandey]

Lets start a merge vote that will run for 3 days, so that this gets
committed later this week.

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Tsz Wo Sze  wrote:

> The web site looks really good.  Thanks a lot for all the hard and
> beautiful works!
> Nicholas
>
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 3:22 AM, anu engineer 
> wrote:
> > Since it is a Ratis branch, should we do a formal vote and merge like
> > Hadoop?  I have looked at the changes very deeply and I am happy with it,
> > but I would like to establish conventions on how to merge code into
> Ratis.
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Anu
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:09 AM, Elek, Marton  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The final proposed version could be checked here:
> >>
> >> https://elek.github.io/ratis-site/
> >>
> >> The source is attached to the jira https://issues.apache.org/jira
> >> /browse/RATIS-5
> >>
> >> Please have a final look and comment.
> >>
> >> If no more objections, I will commit both the source and rendered
> version
> >> to separated branches (asf-site-source/asf-site) and open an INFRA
> ticket
> >> to use it as the source of http://ratis.incubator.apache.org/
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Marton
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/18/2017 03:49 PM, Anu Engineer wrote:
> >>
> >>> Let us move this discussion to the JIRA,
> https://issues.apache.org/jira
> >>> /browse/RATIS-5
> >>> That way we will not lose these ideas/work items.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>> Anu
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/18/17, 5:18 AM, "Mukul Kumar Singh" 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>  +1, Excellent idea.
> >>>   I was also thinking if we an add pages for some example on
> how
> >>> to setup and use ratis in applications.
> >>>   Thanks,
> >>>  Mukul
> >>>   > On 18-Nov-2017, at 4:12 AM, Hugo Louro  >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>  >
> >>>  > +1 - Great idea. I wonder if there are some templates around
> >>>  > incubator/Apache projects that you can use that will make it
> >>> easier and
> >>>  > more consistent with other projects.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > I am not sure I follow the reason to have this in a google doc.
> >>> Why not use
> >>>  > html/markdown with Git alone. You can have this in it's own
> branch
> >>> to
> >>>  > start, and then when it's ready you can simply create a pull
> >>> request.
> >>>  >
> >>>  > Thanks
> >>>  > Hugo
> >>>  >
> >>>  > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Tsz Wo Sze <
> szets...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>  >
> >>>  >> Thanks a lot, Marton.  I just have assigned RATIS-5 "Setup
> >>> website" to you.
> >>>  >> Nicholas
> >>>  >>
> >>>  >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Jing Zhao 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>  >>> +1. Thanks Marton!
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Anu Engineer <
> >>> aengin...@hortonworks.com
> >>>  >>>
> >>>  >>> wrote:
> >>>  >>>
> >>>   +1, great idea. I would like to work with you on this.
> >>>  
> >>>   Thanks
> >>>   Anu
> >>>  
> >>>   On 11/17/17, 12:55 AM, "Elek, Marton"  wrote:
> >>>  
> >>>  Hi,
> >>>  
> >>>  Is there any plan for ratis webpage? I didn't find any
> Jira.
> >>>  
> >>>  My proposal is the following:
> >>>  
> >>>  1. I can create a draft site similar to my hadoop site
> >>> proposal:
> >>>  https://hadoop.anzix.net/
> >>>  
> >>>  2. I can collect the content from ratis presentations.
> >>>  
> >>>  3. I can copy the content to a google docs to make it
> easier
> >>> to
> >>>  fix/improve the content together.
> >>>  
> >>>  4. I will copy back the content to the html/markdown files
> >>> and we
> >>>  >> can
> >>>  commit it to the git repo using a separated branch.
> >>>  
> >>>  I propose to do a simple page (what is ratis?) as a first
> >>> step and
> >>>   after
> >>>  that we can extend with more detailed/version specific
> >>> documentation
> >>>  (such like a getting started guide...)
> >>>  
> >>>  Any thoughts?
> >>>  
> >>>  Thanks,
> >>>  Marton
> >>>  
> >>>  
> >>>  
> >>>  
> >>>  >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>

Re: [VOTE] Ratis Logo

[Jitendra Pandey]

It is ok to vote in this mail thread as well.

From: Jitendra Pandey <jiten...@hortonworks.com>
Reply-To: "dev@ratis.incubator.apache.org" <dev@ratis.incubator.apache.org>
Date: Monday, November 20, 2017 at 11:07 PM
To: "dev@ratis.incubator.apache.org" <dev@ratis.incubator.apache.org>, 
"priv...@ratis.incubator.apache.org" <priv...@ratis.incubator.apache.org>, 
"Will Xu (JIRA)" <j...@hortonworks.jira.com>
Subject: [VOTE] Ratis Logo

Hi All,
 We are voting to accept following logo as the logo for Apache Ratis 
(Attached as a file as well). This logo was proposed by Will Xu in the jira
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-6



[cid:image001.png@01D36255.15150E40]

Following folks have already voted on the jira.

Arpit Agarwal   +1
Jitendra Pandey   +1
Jing Zhao   +1
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze   +1
Mingliang Liu   +1


Others are requested to vote as well. The vote will continue for 3 more days.
[+1] Accept the above logo for Ratis
[-1] Do Not Accept the above logo for Ratis.

Thanks
jitendra

Created jenkins job ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86

[Jitendra Pandey]

I have created a nightly ratis build job 
https://builds.apache.org/job/ratis-qbt-master-java8-linux-x86.

Currently, the pre-commit build as well as the nightly are configured to run on 
RATIS-4 branch for testing. Once testing completes, we will switch the jobs to 
run on the master.

Re: Podling Report Reminder - November 2017

[Jitendra Pandey]

I have posted the status at the status page.
  https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2017

Please let me know or feel free to edit the status. I am posting it here as 
well.

Mentors, please sign off on the status. 

=
Ratis

Ratis is a java implementation for RAFT consensus protocol

Ratis has been incubating since 2017-01-03.

Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:

  1. Setup Jenkins (In Progress)
  2. Add new committers
  3. Work towards a beta release

Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
aware of?

None


How has the community developed since the last report?
   7 new contributors have been added. Total 36 contributors currently.


How has the project developed since the last report?
   Ratis delivered its first release, alpha release 0.1.0-alpha has been made 
available.
   39 new commits to the project.

How would you assess the podling's maturity?
Please feel free to add your own commentary.

  [ ] Initial setup - Jenkins setup is in progress
  [ ] Working towards first release - First release 0.1.0-alpha is available. 
Discussion about 0.2-alpha has started.
  [ ] Community building - Many new contributors. Need to get new committers
  [ ] Nearing graduation 
  [ ] Other:

Date of last release:

  2017-05-17

When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?
  
  - Initial set of committers/PPMC.



Thanks
jitendra



On 10/29/17, 3:30 AM, "johndam...@apache.org"  wrote:

Dear podling,

This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
prepare your quarterly board report.

The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 15 November 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
submission (Wed, November 01).

Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
meeting.

Thanks,

The Apache Incubator PMC

Submitting your Report

--

Your report should contain the following:

*   Your project name
*   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
the project or necessarily of its field
*   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
towards graduation.
*   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
aware of
*   How has the community developed since the last report
*   How has the project developed since the last report.
*   How does the podling rate their own maturity.

This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:

https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2017

Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
this page is created from a template.

Mentors
---

Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
for the Incubator PMC.

Incubator PMC

Re: contribution

[Jitendra Pandey]

Hi Marton,
   Do you have a patch for RATIS-95, I don’t see one attached.

Thanks
jitendra

On 7/27/17, 5:36 AM, "Marton, Elek"  wrote:

Hi, thx the answer.

I created multiple issues (RATIS-94/95).

I uploaded a patch to RATIS-95.

Two questions:

1. Is there any status equivalent to Hadoop PATCH_AVAILABLE? What should 
I do if the patch is read for review?

2. I need to turn on clean-shade profile for 'mvn clean' to delete the 
generated files. It was a little bit confising for me, as a simple clean 
doesn't delete all the created files. Not a big deal, but is there any 
reason why it's not run automaticaly during a maven clean? I if it just 
beacuse some maven issues/limitation I would be happy to investigate it...

Marton

On 07/03/2017 08:19 PM, Jing Zhao wrote:
> Elek, great proposals! I've added you to the contributor list. Please feel
> free to create jiras and assign them to yourself.
> 
> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Marton, Elek  wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to contribute to Ratis.
>>
>> I have two proposals:
>>
>>   1. I would like to create and register JMX beans for every 
RaftServerImpl
>> to display at least the current leader, term, index,...
>>
>> I would like to show this information from the (under devepolment)
>> Ozone web ui interfaces.
>>
>>   2. I would like to add a simple Server and Client class to the example
>> project. Currently it could be tested only from unit test. I think it 
would
>> be more easily to try out ratis by starting standalon example servers 
with
>> `java -jar...`. (And check on the JMX interface, if everything is 
fine...)
>>
>>
>> Please comment my ideas, and if agree, add my user (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=elek) to the
>> contributors group.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Marton
>>
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.2-alpha release

[Jitendra Pandey]

+1

On 10/10/17, 8:26 PM, "Anu Engineer"  wrote:

+1, Ozone would love to get the latest Ratis bits.

Thanks
Anu


On 10/10/17, 8:15 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze"  wrote:

It has been more than 4 months after the 0.1-alpha release.  After
that, we have some API change (introducing RaftGroup) and a few bug
fixes.  How about we roll a 0.2-alpha release?

Tsz-Wo

Re: Podling Report Reminder - April 2017

[Jitendra Pandey]

The report has been updated on the wiki.


On 4/5/17, 5:42 PM, "johndam...@apache.org"  wrote:

>Dear podling,
>
>This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
>Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
>prepare your quarterly board report.
>
>The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 19 April 2017, 10:30 am PDT.
>The report for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC
>report. The Incubator PMC requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks
>before the board meeting, to allow sufficient time for review and
>submission (Wed, April 05).
>
>Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the Incubator
>PMC, and subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the
>very latest you should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board
>meeting.
>
>Thanks,
>
>The Apache Incubator PMC
>
>Submitting your Report
>
>--
>
>Your report should contain the following:
>
>*   Your project name
>*   A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
>the project or necessarily of its field
>*   A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
>towards graduation.
>*   Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
>aware of
>*   How has the community developed since the last report
>*   How has the project developed since the last report.
>*   How does the podling rate their own maturity.
>
>This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
>https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2017
>
>Note: This is manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
>this page is created from a template.
>
>Mentors
>---
>
>Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
>the Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are
>following the project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms
>for the Incubator PMC.
>
>Incubator PMC
>

Re: [DISCUSS] 0.1-alpha release

[Jitendra Pandey]

0.1.0-alpha will be better. Three digit versions are better to distinguish
major, minor and maintenance releases.

On 3/23/17, 2:08 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <szets...@gmail.com> wrote:

>How about the versioning?  Should we start with 0.1-alpha or
>0.1.0-alpha?  The latter seems better.
>
>Tsz-Wo
>
>On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Jitendra Pandey <jnpan...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:32 PM, Enis Söztutar <enis@gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>> Sounds good. But we have to get the licenses and the rest of release
>>> process in line (tarballs, etc). Should be doable.
>>>
>>> Enis
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:12 PM, Anu Engineer
>>><aengin...@hortonworks.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > +1, good idea. Early use in SCM will give some real world usage via
>>> CBlock
>>> > and Ozone.
>>> > --Anu
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On 3/22/17, 4:10 PM, "Tsz Wo Sze" <szets...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > >Hi,
>>> > >
>>> > >I propose to release 0.1-alpha so that the downstream projects can
>>> > >start integrating ratis.  One example is HDFS-11519.
>>> > >
>>> > >The release is in alpha quality with no guarantee on stability.  We
>>> > >should add such warning in the README.  What do you think?
>>> > >
>>> > >Tsz-Wo
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>