Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Alex Harui]

OK, I think I saw Maven build with and without the Flash stuff.  I pushed the 
changes to the release branch.  The changes required reverting the version 
numbers on royale-compiler and royale-asjs but not royale-typedefs.

To build with the Adobe stuff with Maven, you will have to use system 
properties (as well as profiles):

  -Dgenerate.swf.swcs=true

Or for examples:

  -Dgenerate.swf=true

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/23/19, 1:29 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

The reason I am unsure about this release is that, in theory, we all agreed 
to be PMC members to make growing the community our primary goal.  To achieve 
that goal, we should be doing things to attract not just new users, but even 
more importantly, new committers.  We know we've got tons of bugs and features 
to work on, so we want someone to grab the release, try it, and when they find 
a problem, we want them to try to fix it.  And right now, they won't be able to 
build with Ant or Maven without the Adobe stuff.

I imagine you are quite frustrated by now, but I am also frustrated because 
I see people spending energy on guessing at workarounds instead of actually 
taking the time to analyze and propose solutions.  And then I end up putting 
off my other tasks to do the analysis, and IMO, that doesn't help the community 
nearly as much as having other committers/PMC members develop the skills to 
solve problems like this in the future.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 9/23/19, 8:59 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

My point is that all those fixes are for SDK Developers, not for Users. 
I
would like to satisfy users not SDK developers, the first one are 
waiting
too long for release.

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:53 Alex Harui  
napisał(a):

> Depends on your definition of small.  The .mvn/extensions.xml is 
missing
> from royale-compiler.  That's why it won't auto-download the Adobe 
stuff.
>
> Then almost every pom.xml needs to be changed to support js-only.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/23/19, 8:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  
wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> Carlos is able to build framework by ANT so to me it's enough to 
go
> with
> release. I have pushed him to try cause I thought that with some 
small
> workarounds he will be able to build that as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:46 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Update:  There is definitely a problem with the source package 
that
> > prevents building the source with Maven from a truly clean 
machine.
> I have
> > some changes pending.  This is going to be a pretty large 
commit as
> if
> > affects a lot of files.   I'm not sure why Piotr is have Carlos
> continue to
> > try things.  That seems like duplication of effort to me.  I 
will
> hopefully
> > have this working by end of my day today.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/21/19, 4:51 PM, "Alex Harui"  
wrote:
> >
> > I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.
> >
> > Please remember that the scripts and instructions are biased
> towards
> > js-only.  If you have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and
> FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
> > set then you will need different profiles.
> >
> > Looks like this failure is caused by change 228f4fbd1.  
There
> should
> > not be hard dependencies on Adobe stuff in order to support 
js-only.
> >
> > In testing a fix, I found out how to reproduce Josh's first
> issue with
> > the Maven build from a clean machine (remove all adobe and 
royale
> artifacts
> > from local repo) for js-only.  More changes to the poms are
> necessary.  I
> > will try to figure it out.
> >
> > And so, this means that a few more folks are likely to have
> trouble
> > building from source.  Again, most folks are going to just use 
the
> > binaries, but I'm worried about first impressions for those who 
do
> use the
> > source.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/21/19, 2:32 PM, "Carlos Rovira" 

> wrote:
> >
> > HI Piotr,
> >
> > since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with 
some
> > concrete info,
> > or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
> > I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile 
too.
> >
> > 

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Alex Harui]

The reason I am unsure about this release is that, in theory, we all agreed to 
be PMC members to make growing the community our primary goal.  To achieve that 
goal, we should be doing things to attract not just new users, but even more 
importantly, new committers.  We know we've got tons of bugs and features to 
work on, so we want someone to grab the release, try it, and when they find a 
problem, we want them to try to fix it.  And right now, they won't be able to 
build with Ant or Maven without the Adobe stuff.

I imagine you are quite frustrated by now, but I am also frustrated because I 
see people spending energy on guessing at workarounds instead of actually 
taking the time to analyze and propose solutions.  And then I end up putting 
off my other tasks to do the analysis, and IMO, that doesn't help the community 
nearly as much as having other committers/PMC members develop the skills to 
solve problems like this in the future.

My 2 cents,
-Alex

On 9/23/19, 8:59 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

My point is that all those fixes are for SDK Developers, not for Users. I
would like to satisfy users not SDK developers, the first one are waiting
too long for release.

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:53 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> Depends on your definition of small.  The .mvn/extensions.xml is missing
> from royale-compiler.  That's why it won't auto-download the Adobe stuff.
>
> Then almost every pom.xml needs to be changed to support js-only.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/23/19, 8:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> Carlos is able to build framework by ANT so to me it's enough to go
> with
> release. I have pushed him to try cause I thought that with some small
> workarounds he will be able to build that as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:46 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Update:  There is definitely a problem with the source package that
> > prevents building the source with Maven from a truly clean machine.
> I have
> > some changes pending.  This is going to be a pretty large commit as
> if
> > affects a lot of files.   I'm not sure why Piotr is have Carlos
> continue to
> > try things.  That seems like duplication of effort to me.  I will
> hopefully
> > have this working by end of my day today.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/21/19, 4:51 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >
> > I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.
> >
> > Please remember that the scripts and instructions are biased
> towards
> > js-only.  If you have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and
> FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
> > set then you will need different profiles.
> >
> > Looks like this failure is caused by change 228f4fbd1.  There
> should
> > not be hard dependencies on Adobe stuff in order to support js-only.
> >
> > In testing a fix, I found out how to reproduce Josh's first
> issue with
> > the Maven build from a clean machine (remove all adobe and royale
> artifacts
> > from local repo) for js-only.  More changes to the poms are
> necessary.  I
> > will try to figure it out.
> >
> > And so, this means that a few more folks are likely to have
> trouble
> > building from source.  Again, most folks are going to just use the
> > binaries, but I'm worried about first impressions for those who do
> use the
> > source.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/21/19, 2:32 PM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> wrote:
> >
> > HI Piotr,
> >
> > since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some
> > concrete info,
> > or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
> > I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.
> >
> > Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > You have example of such file in repository. Just based on
> that
> > setup
> > > staging link repository. Currently in that file you have
> > Snapshot links and
> > > release. Based on this you can setup staging.
> > >
> > > Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in the
> > previous
> > > releases.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure even if that 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Alex Harui]

The value is different for each individual's computer.  It is meant as an 
acceptance of a LICENSE, not a workaround to avoid acceptance of a LICENSE.

-Alex

On 9/23/19, 9:40 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Do you have this env. setup
systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted ? You need
to have with value I think  6d2bc022.

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 18:33 Carlos Rovira 
napisał(a):

> Hi Piotr,
>
> For this hour my laptop was running the build again, and now the script
> seems to end in an endless loop repeating this in console all the time:
>
>
> 
"Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=6d2bc022
> )
>
> Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Your System-Id: 6d2bc022
>
> The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR SDK. Do you want
> to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK License:
> http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html
>
> (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build, alternatively to
> typing y or yes you can also set a system property containing your system
> which is interpreted as equivalent to accepting by typing y or yes: -"
>
> I can launch it again to see what happens...
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:16, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2
> repositories.
> > In the real one there's no such layout
> > Going to rerun again.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Ok so what is the output of your build now ?
> >>
> >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> > Hi Piotr,
> >> > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the
> >> > sending.
> >> > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
> >> >
> >> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >> >
> >> > > Carlos,
> >> > >
> >> > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and
> >> post
> >> > > links.
> >> > >
> >> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
> >> > > napisał(a):
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi all,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > this is what I have in my .m2
> >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> >> > > >
> >> > > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'll try to build now with his layout
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Carlos,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue
> >> from
> >> > > your
> >> > > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it
> manually
> >> > into
> >> > > >> Maven folder and try again.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Thanks,
> >> > > >> Piotr
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira  >
> >> > > >> napisał(a):
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > Hi,
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly
> the
> >> > same
> >> > > >> > problem with flash player as always:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress
> (1):
> >> > > >> 1.0/1.0
> >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress 
(1):
> >> > > 1.0/1.0
> >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress 
(1):
> >> > > 1.0/1.0
> >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from
> >> > central:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepo.maven.apache.org%2Fmaven2%2Fde%2Fjflex%2Fjflex%2F1.6.0%2Fjflex-1.6.0.jardata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C003d6d99b4834f7bdf8a08d74044c278%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637048536383335101sdata=6qsq1FXxf6UnlEpHIYN1JVURpQsdV99PwD9kpipbQlc%3Dreserved=0
> >> > > >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> >> > > >> >
> >> > >
> >> 

> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > 

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Anyone know what should Carlos setup in that environment variable to pass
farther?

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019, 7:18 PM Carlos Rovira  wrote:

> Hi,
> process did the same endless loop.
>
> @Piotr Zarzycki  do you mean to add to may
> .bash_profile "export
> systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted= 6d2bc022" ?
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 18:40, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Do you have this env. setup
> > systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted ? You need
> > to have with value I think  6d2bc022.
> >
> > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 18:33 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > For this hour my laptop was running the build again, and now the script
> > > seems to end in an endless loop repeating this in console all the time:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> "Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=6d2bc022
> > > )
> > >
> > > Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Your System-Id: 6d2bc022
> > >
> > > The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR SDK. Do you
> want
> > > to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK License:
> > > http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html
> > >
> > > (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build, alternatively to
> > > typing y or yes you can also set a system property containing your
> system
> > > which is interpreted as equivalent to accepting by typing y or yes: -"
> > >
> > > I can launch it again to see what happens...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:16, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2
> > > repositories.
> > > > In the real one there's no such layout
> > > > Going to rerun again.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > >> Ok so what is the output of your build now ?
> > > >>
> > > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
> > > >> napisał(a):
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi Piotr,
> > > >> > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do
> > the
> > > >> > sending.
> > > >> > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
> > > >> >
> > > >> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > > Carlos,
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere
> > and
> > > >> post
> > > >> > > links.
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > >> > > napisał(a):
> > > >> > >
> > > >> > > > Hi all,
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > this is what I have in my .m2
> > > >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > I'll try to build now with his layout
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >> > > >
> > > >> > > >> Carlos,
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one
> > issue
> > > >> from
> > > >> > > your
> > > >> > > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it
> > > manually
> > > >> > into
> > > >> > > >> Maven folder and try again.
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> > > >> Piotr
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> > > >> napisał(a):
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log.
> Mostly
> > > the
> > > >> > same
> > > >> > > >> > problem with flash player as always:
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> MBProgress
> > > (1):
> > > >> > > >> 1.0/1.0
> > > >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress
> > (1):
> > > >> > > 1.0/1.0
> > > >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress
> > (1):
> > > >> > > 1.0/1.0
> > > >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded
> from
> > > >> > central:
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > > >>
> > > >> > >
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> > > >> > > >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> > > >> > > >> >
> > > >> > >
> > > >>
> > 

[Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Carlos,

Well I don't see importance from user perspective to that changes at all.
It means that you are not going to vote?

Thanks,
Piotr

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019, 7:22 PM Carlos Rovira  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I will stop for today, want to work a bit on royale-docs mobile layout that
> I have near finish, so I'll wait for Alex changes and try tomorrow. IMHO
> this stuff is important, so it's worth the waiting time of a day or two.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 201. 9 a las 17:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > My point is that all those fixes are for SDK Developers, not for Users. I
> > would like to satisfy users not SDK developers, the first one are waiting
> > too long for release.
> >
> > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:53 Alex Harui 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Depends on your definition of small.  The .mvn/extensions.xml is
> missing
> > > from royale-compiler.  That's why it won't auto-download the Adobe
> stuff.
> > >
> > > Then almost every pom.xml needs to be changed to support js-only.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/23/19, 8:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Alex,
> > >
> > > Carlos is able to build framework by ANT so to me it's enough to go
> > > with
> > > release. I have pushed him to try cause I thought that with some
> > small
> > > workarounds he will be able to build that as well.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:46 Alex Harui 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Update:  There is definitely a problem with the source package
> that
> > > > prevents building the source with Maven from a truly clean
> machine.
> > > I have
> > > > some changes pending.  This is going to be a pretty large commit
> as
> > > if
> > > > affects a lot of files.   I'm not sure why Piotr is have Carlos
> > > continue to
> > > > try things.  That seems like duplication of effort to me.  I will
> > > hopefully
> > > > have this working by end of my day today.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 9/21/19, 4:51 PM, "Alex Harui" 
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.
> > > >
> > > > Please remember that the scripts and instructions are biased
> > > towards
> > > > js-only.  If you have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and
> > > FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
> > > > set then you will need different profiles.
> > > >
> > > > Looks like this failure is caused by change 228f4fbd1.  There
> > > should
> > > > not be hard dependencies on Adobe stuff in order to support
> > js-only.
> > > >
> > > > In testing a fix, I found out how to reproduce Josh's first
> > > issue with
> > > > the Maven build from a clean machine (remove all adobe and royale
> > > artifacts
> > > > from local repo) for js-only.  More changes to the poms are
> > > necessary.  I
> > > > will try to figure it out.
> > > >
> > > > And so, this means that a few more folks are likely to have
> > > trouble
> > > > building from source.  Again, most folks are going to just use
> the
> > > > binaries, but I'm worried about first impressions for those who
> do
> > > use the
> > > > source.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 9/21/19, 2:32 PM, "Carlos Rovira" <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > HI Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with
> some
> > > > concrete info,
> > > > or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
> > > > I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.
> > > >
> > > > Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > Carlos
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > You have example of such file in repository. Just based
> > on
> > > that
> > > > setup
> > > > > staging link repository. Currently in that file you
> have
> > > > Snapshot links and
> > > > > release. Based on this you can setup staging.
> > > > >
> > > > > Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in
> > the
> > > > previous
> > > > > releases.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure even if that is needed it's just I wanted
> to
> > > > confirm that is
> > > > > really not needed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you have player global setup env variable?
> > > > >
> > > > > If you won't figure out stuff I will share it on
> Monday.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> 

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi,

I will stop for today, want to work a bit on royale-docs mobile layout that
I have near finish, so I'll wait for Alex changes and try tomorrow. IMHO
this stuff is important, so it's worth the waiting time of a day or two.

Thanks





El lun., 23 sept. 201. 9 a las 17:59, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> My point is that all those fixes are for SDK Developers, not for Users. I
> would like to satisfy users not SDK developers, the first one are waiting
> too long for release.
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:53 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Depends on your definition of small.  The .mvn/extensions.xml is missing
> > from royale-compiler.  That's why it won't auto-download the Adobe stuff.
> >
> > Then almost every pom.xml needs to be changed to support js-only.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/23/19, 8:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Alex,
> >
> > Carlos is able to build framework by ANT so to me it's enough to go
> > with
> > release. I have pushed him to try cause I thought that with some
> small
> > workarounds he will be able to build that as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:46 Alex Harui 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Update:  There is definitely a problem with the source package that
> > > prevents building the source with Maven from a truly clean machine.
> > I have
> > > some changes pending.  This is going to be a pretty large commit as
> > if
> > > affects a lot of files.   I'm not sure why Piotr is have Carlos
> > continue to
> > > try things.  That seems like duplication of effort to me.  I will
> > hopefully
> > > have this working by end of my day today.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/21/19, 4:51 PM, "Alex Harui" 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.
> > >
> > > Please remember that the scripts and instructions are biased
> > towards
> > > js-only.  If you have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and
> > FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
> > > set then you will need different profiles.
> > >
> > > Looks like this failure is caused by change 228f4fbd1.  There
> > should
> > > not be hard dependencies on Adobe stuff in order to support
> js-only.
> > >
> > > In testing a fix, I found out how to reproduce Josh's first
> > issue with
> > > the Maven build from a clean machine (remove all adobe and royale
> > artifacts
> > > from local repo) for js-only.  More changes to the poms are
> > necessary.  I
> > > will try to figure it out.
> > >
> > > And so, this means that a few more folks are likely to have
> > trouble
> > > building from source.  Again, most folks are going to just use the
> > > binaries, but I'm worried about first impressions for those who do
> > use the
> > > source.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/21/19, 2:32 PM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > HI Piotr,
> > >
> > > since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some
> > > concrete info,
> > > or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
> > > I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.
> > >
> > > Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Carlos
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > You have example of such file in repository. Just based
> on
> > that
> > > setup
> > > > staging link repository. Currently in that file you have
> > > Snapshot links and
> > > > release. Based on this you can setup staging.
> > > >
> > > > Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in
> the
> > > previous
> > > > releases.
> > > >
> > > > I'm not sure even if that is needed it's just I wanted to
> > > confirm that is
> > > > really not needed.
> > > >
> > > > Do you have player global setup env variable?
> > > >
> > > > If you won't figure out stuff I will share it on Monday.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 8:06 PM Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Piort,
> > > > >
> > > > > can you share here the set of links to add to my
> > > .m2/settings.xml?
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi,
process did the same endless loop.

@Piotr Zarzycki  do you mean to add to may
.bash_profile "export
systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted= 6d2bc022" ?



El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 18:40, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Do you have this env. setup
> systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted ? You need
> to have with value I think  6d2bc022.
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 18:33 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > For this hour my laptop was running the build again, and now the script
> > seems to end in an endless loop repeating this in console all the time:
> >
> >
> >
> "Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=6d2bc022
> > )
> >
> > Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Your System-Id: 6d2bc022
> >
> > The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR SDK. Do you want
> > to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK License:
> > http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html
> >
> > (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build, alternatively to
> > typing y or yes you can also set a system property containing your system
> > which is interpreted as equivalent to accepting by typing y or yes: -"
> >
> > I can launch it again to see what happens...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:16, Carlos Rovira (<
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2
> > repositories.
> > > In the real one there's no such layout
> > > Going to rerun again.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > >> Ok so what is the output of your build now ?
> > >>
> > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
> > >> napisał(a):
> > >>
> > >> > Hi Piotr,
> > >> > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do
> the
> > >> > sending.
> > >> > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
> > >> >
> > >> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Carlos,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere
> and
> > >> post
> > >> > > links.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
> > >> > > napisał(a):
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi all,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > this is what I have in my .m2
> > >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > I'll try to build now with his layout
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> Carlos,
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one
> issue
> > >> from
> > >> > > your
> > >> > > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it
> > manually
> > >> > into
> > >> > > >> Maven folder and try again.
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Thanks,
> > >> > > >> Piotr
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >
> > >> > > >> napisał(a):
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> > Hi,
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly
> > the
> > >> > same
> > >> > > >> > problem with flash player as always:
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress
> > (1):
> > >> > > >> 1.0/1.0
> > >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress
> (1):
> > >> > > 1.0/1.0
> > >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress
> (1):
> > >> > > 1.0/1.0
> > >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from
> > >> > central:
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> > >> > > >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > >
> > >>
> 
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> > 0.9.6:
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > [INFO]
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 
> > >> SUCCESS
> > >> > [
> > >> > > >> > 6.206 s]
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ...
> > >> SUCCESS
> > >> > > >> [01:24
> > >> > > >> > min]
> > >> > > >> >
> > >> > > >> > 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Do you have this env. setup
systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted ? You need
to have with value I think  6d2bc022.

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 18:33 Carlos Rovira 
napisał(a):

> Hi Piotr,
>
> For this hour my laptop was running the build again, and now the script
> seems to end in an endless loop repeating this in console all the time:
>
>
> "Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=6d2bc022
> )
>
> Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Your System-Id: 6d2bc022
>
> The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR SDK. Do you want
> to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK License:
> http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html
>
> (In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build, alternatively to
> typing y or yes you can also set a system property containing your system
> which is interpreted as equivalent to accepting by typing y or yes: -"
>
> I can launch it again to see what happens...
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:16, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> escribió:
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2
> repositories.
> > In the real one there's no such layout
> > Going to rerun again.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Ok so what is the output of your build now ?
> >>
> >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> > Hi Piotr,
> >> > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the
> >> > sending.
> >> > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
> >> >
> >> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >> >
> >> > > Carlos,
> >> > >
> >> > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and
> >> post
> >> > > links.
> >> > >
> >> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
> >> > > napisał(a):
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi all,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > this is what I have in my .m2
> >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> >> > > >
> >> > > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > I'll try to build now with his layout
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> >> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> Carlos,
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue
> >> from
> >> > > your
> >> > > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it
> manually
> >> > into
> >> > > >> Maven folder and try again.
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Thanks,
> >> > > >> Piotr
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira  >
> >> > > >> napisał(a):
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> > Hi,
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly
> the
> >> > same
> >> > > >> > problem with flash player as always:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress
> (1):
> >> > > >> 1.0/1.0
> >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> >> > > 1.0/1.0
> >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> >> > > 1.0/1.0
> >> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from
> >> > central:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >>
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> >> > > >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> >> > > >> >
> >> > >
> >> 
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent
> 0.9.6:
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO]
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 
> >> SUCCESS
> >> > [
> >> > > >> > 6.206 s]
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ...
> >> SUCCESS
> >> > > >> [01:24
> >> > > >> > min]
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils 
> >> SUCCESS
> >> > [
> >> > > >> > 3.174 s]
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ...
> >> SUCCESS
> >> > [
> >> > > >> > 58.423 s]
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler ..
> >> FAILURE
> >> > [
> >> > > >> > 8.802 s]
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ...
> >> SKIPPED
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils ..
> >> SKIPPED
> >> > > >> >
> >> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Piotr,

For this hour my laptop was running the build again, and now the script
seems to end in an endless loop repeating this in console all the time:

"Dcom.adobe.systemIdsForWhichTheTermsOfTheAdobeLicenseAgreementAreAccepted=6d2bc022
)

Do you accept (Yes/No) ? Your System-Id: 6d2bc022

The Adobe SDK license agreement applies to the Adobe AIR SDK. Do you want
to install the Adobe AIR SDK? Adobe AIR SDK License:
http://www.adobe.com/products/air/sdk-eula.html

(In a non-interactive build such as a CI server build, alternatively to
typing y or yes you can also set a system property containing your system
which is interpreted as equivalent to accepting by typing y or yes: -"

I can launch it again to see what happens...




El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:16, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi Piotr,
>
> sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2 repositories.
> In the real one there's no such layout
> Going to rerun again.
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Ok so what is the output of your build now ?
>>
>> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Hi Piotr,
>> > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the
>> > sending.
>> > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
>> >
>> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >
>> > > Carlos,
>> > >
>> > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and
>> post
>> > > links.
>> > >
>> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
>> > > napisał(a):
>> > >
>> > > > Hi all,
>> > > >
>> > > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
>> > > >
>> > > > this is what I have in my .m2
>> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
>> > > >
>> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
>> > > >
>> > > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
>> > > >
>> > > > I'll try to build now with his layout
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Carlos,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue
>> from
>> > > your
>> > > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually
>> > into
>> > > >> Maven folder and try again.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks,
>> > > >> Piotr
>> > > >>
>> > > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
>> > > >> napisał(a):
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Hi,
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the
>> > same
>> > > >> > problem with flash player as always:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
>> > > >> 1.0/1.0
>> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
>> > > 1.0/1.0
>> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
>> > > 1.0/1.0
>> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from
>> > central:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> >
>> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
>> > > >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
>> > > >> >
>> > >
>> 
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 
>> SUCCESS
>> > [
>> > > >> > 6.206 s]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ...
>> SUCCESS
>> > > >> [01:24
>> > > >> > min]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils 
>> SUCCESS
>> > [
>> > > >> > 3.174 s]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ...
>> SUCCESS
>> > [
>> > > >> > 58.423 s]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler ..
>> FAILURE
>> > [
>> > > >> > 8.802 s]
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ...
>> SKIPPED
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils ..
>> SKIPPED
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger ..
>> SKIPPED
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer .
>> SKIPPED
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks 
>> SKIPPED
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks 
>> SKIPPED
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin .
>> SKIPPED
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > [INFO]
>> > > >> >
>> > >
>> 

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

My point is that all those fixes are for SDK Developers, not for Users. I
would like to satisfy users not SDK developers, the first one are waiting
too long for release.

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:53 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> Depends on your definition of small.  The .mvn/extensions.xml is missing
> from royale-compiler.  That's why it won't auto-download the Adobe stuff.
>
> Then almost every pom.xml needs to be changed to support js-only.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/23/19, 8:50 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> Alex,
>
> Carlos is able to build framework by ANT so to me it's enough to go
> with
> release. I have pushed him to try cause I thought that with some small
> workarounds he will be able to build that as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:46 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Update:  There is definitely a problem with the source package that
> > prevents building the source with Maven from a truly clean machine.
> I have
> > some changes pending.  This is going to be a pretty large commit as
> if
> > affects a lot of files.   I'm not sure why Piotr is have Carlos
> continue to
> > try things.  That seems like duplication of effort to me.  I will
> hopefully
> > have this working by end of my day today.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/21/19, 4:51 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
> >
> > I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.
> >
> > Please remember that the scripts and instructions are biased
> towards
> > js-only.  If you have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and
> FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
> > set then you will need different profiles.
> >
> > Looks like this failure is caused by change 228f4fbd1.  There
> should
> > not be hard dependencies on Adobe stuff in order to support js-only.
> >
> > In testing a fix, I found out how to reproduce Josh's first
> issue with
> > the Maven build from a clean machine (remove all adobe and royale
> artifacts
> > from local repo) for js-only.  More changes to the poms are
> necessary.  I
> > will try to figure it out.
> >
> > And so, this means that a few more folks are likely to have
> trouble
> > building from source.  Again, most folks are going to just use the
> > binaries, but I'm worried about first impressions for those who do
> use the
> > source.
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/21/19, 2:32 PM, "Carlos Rovira" 
> wrote:
> >
> > HI Piotr,
> >
> > since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some
> > concrete info,
> > or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
> > I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.
> >
> > Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > You have example of such file in repository. Just based on
> that
> > setup
> > > staging link repository. Currently in that file you have
> > Snapshot links and
> > > release. Based on this you can setup staging.
> > >
> > > Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in the
> > previous
> > > releases.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure even if that is needed it's just I wanted to
> > confirm that is
> > > really not needed.
> > >
> > > Do you have player global setup env variable?
> > >
> > > If you won't figure out stuff I will share it on Monday.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 8:06 PM Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Piort,
> > > >
> > > > can you share here the set of links to add to my
> > .m2/settings.xml?
> > > >
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > > > Switching subject to discuss.
> > > > >
> > > > > Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging
> > artifacts? And
> > > > run
> > > > > approve script again.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Curious 

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Alex,

Carlos is able to build framework by ANT so to me it's enough to go with
release. I have pushed him to try cause I thought that with some small
workarounds he will be able to build that as well.

Thanks,
Piotr

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:46 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> Update:  There is definitely a problem with the source package that
> prevents building the source with Maven from a truly clean machine.  I have
> some changes pending.  This is going to be a pretty large commit as if
> affects a lot of files.   I'm not sure why Piotr is have Carlos continue to
> try things.  That seems like duplication of effort to me.  I will hopefully
> have this working by end of my day today.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/21/19, 4:51 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:
>
> I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.
>
> Please remember that the scripts and instructions are biased towards
> js-only.  If you have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER
> set then you will need different profiles.
>
> Looks like this failure is caused by change 228f4fbd1.  There should
> not be hard dependencies on Adobe stuff in order to support js-only.
>
> In testing a fix, I found out how to reproduce Josh's first issue with
> the Maven build from a clean machine (remove all adobe and royale artifacts
> from local repo) for js-only.  More changes to the poms are necessary.  I
> will try to figure it out.
>
> And so, this means that a few more folks are likely to have trouble
> building from source.  Again, most folks are going to just use the
> binaries, but I'm worried about first impressions for those who do use the
> source.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/21/19, 2:32 PM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:
>
> HI Piotr,
>
> since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some
> concrete info,
> or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
> I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.
>
> Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7
>
> thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
> El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > You have example of such file in repository. Just based on that
> setup
> > staging link repository. Currently in that file you have
> Snapshot links and
> > release. Based on this you can setup staging.
> >
> > Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in the
> previous
> > releases.
> >
> > I'm not sure even if that is needed it's just I wanted to
> confirm that is
> > really not needed.
> >
> > Do you have player global setup env variable?
> >
> > If you won't figure out stuff I will share it on Monday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 8:06 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Piort,
> > >
> > > can you share here the set of links to add to my
> .m2/settings.xml?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Switching subject to discuss.
> > > >
> > > > Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging
> artifacts? And
> > > run
> > > > approve script again.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Curious thing is:
> > > > >
> > > > > if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:
> > > > >
> > > > > mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > with clean .m2 all ends properly.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepo.maven.apache.org%2Fmaven2%2Forg%2Fcodehaus%2Fplexus%2Fplexus-container-default%2F1.0-alpha-9-stable-1%2Fplexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jardata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C102bbce2a6b94f47599408d73eeea986%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637047067078793068sdata=QhbpGC%2BtKlQ4dxLvri%2FmYdSerlKFUTjqXkGfDeBE0c0%3Dreserved=0
> > > > > (194 kB at 290 kB/s)
> > > > >
> > > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > > >
> >
> 

Re: [Discuss] Discuss Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Alex Harui]

Update:  There is definitely a problem with the source package that prevents 
building the source with Maven from a truly clean machine.  I have some changes 
pending.  This is going to be a pretty large commit as if affects a lot of 
files.   I'm not sure why Piotr is have Carlos continue to try things.  That 
seems like duplication of effort to me.  I will hopefully have this working by 
end of my day today.

-Alex

On 9/21/19, 4:51 PM, "Alex Harui"  wrote:

I changed the subject to try to keep the threads separated.

Please remember that the scripts and instructions are biased towards 
js-only.  If you have PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, AIR_HOME, and FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER set 
then you will need different profiles.

Looks like this failure is caused by change 228f4fbd1.  There should not be 
hard dependencies on Adobe stuff in order to support js-only.

In testing a fix, I found out how to reproduce Josh's first issue with the 
Maven build from a clean machine (remove all adobe and royale artifacts from 
local repo) for js-only.  More changes to the poms are necessary.  I will try 
to figure it out.

And so, this means that a few more folks are likely to have trouble 
building from source.  Again, most folks are going to just use the binaries, 
but I'm worried about first impressions for those who do use the source.

-Alex

On 9/21/19, 2:32 PM, "Carlos Rovira"  wrote:

HI Piotr,

since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some concrete 
info,
or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.

Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7

thanks

Carlos




El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> You have example of such file in repository. Just based on that setup
> staging link repository. Currently in that file you have Snapshot 
links and
> release. Based on this you can setup staging.
>
> Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in the previous
> releases.
>
> I'm not sure even if that is needed it's just I wanted to confirm 
that is
> really not needed.
>
> Do you have player global setup env variable?
>
> If you won't figure out stuff I will share it on Monday.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 8:06 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piort,
> >
> > can you share here the set of links to add to my .m2/settings.xml?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Switching subject to discuss.
> > >
> > > Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging 
artifacts? And
> > run
> > > approve script again.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira 

> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Curious thing is:
> > > >
> > > > if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:
> > > >
> > > > mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > with clean .m2 all ends properly.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepo.maven.apache.org%2Fmaven2%2Forg%2Fcodehaus%2Fplexus%2Fplexus-container-default%2F1.0-alpha-9-stable-1%2Fplexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jardata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C102bbce2a6b94f47599408d73eeea986%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637047067078793068sdata=QhbpGC%2BtKlQ4dxLvri%2FmYdSerlKFUTjqXkGfDeBE0c0%3Dreserved=0
> > > > (194 kB at 290 kB/s)
> > > >
> > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Frepo.maven.apache.org%2Fmaven2%2Forg%2Fantlr%2FST4%2F4.0.4%2FST4-4.0.4.jardata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C102bbce2a6b94f47599408d73eeea986%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637047067078793068sdata=C%2BMVzWH3QNeEH42YUkHU4Mrx64sXvaPbfwjWcbSlOnA%3Dreserved=0
> > > > (237
> > > > kB at 345 kB/s)
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while 
processing the
> > > POMs:
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR] 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Piotr,

sorry, ignore my latest emails. Since I forgot to switch .m2 repositories.
In the real one there's no such layout
Going to rerun again.




El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 17:13, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Ok so what is the output of your build now ?
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> > since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the
> > sending.
> > The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Carlos,
> > >
> > > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and
> post
> > > links.
> > >
> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> > > >
> > > > this is what I have in my .m2
> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> > > >
> > > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> > > >
> > > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> > > >
> > > > I'll try to build now with his layout
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > > >
> > > >> Carlos,
> > > >>
> > > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue
> from
> > > your
> > > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually
> > into
> > > >> Maven folder and try again.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Piotr
> > > >>
> > > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
> > > >> napisał(a):
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the
> > same
> > > >> > problem with flash player as always:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> > > >> 1.0/1.0
> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> > > 1.0/1.0
> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> > > 1.0/1.0
> > > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from
> > central:
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> > > >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> > > >> >
> > >
> 
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 
> SUCCESS
> > [
> > > >> > 6.206 s]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ...
> SUCCESS
> > > >> [01:24
> > > >> > min]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils 
> SUCCESS
> > [
> > > >> > 3.174 s]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ...
> SUCCESS
> > [
> > > >> > 58.423 s]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler ..
> FAILURE
> > [
> > > >> > 8.802 s]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ...
> SKIPPED
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils ..
> SKIPPED
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger ..
> SKIPPED
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer .
> SKIPPED
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks 
> SKIPPED
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks 
> SKIPPED
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin .
> SKIPPED
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO]
> > > >> >
> > >
> 
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO]
> > > >> >
> > >
> 
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO]
> > > >> >
> > >
> 
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not
> > resolve
> > > >> > dependencies for project
> > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> > > >> > Could not find artifact
> > > com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> > > >> in
> > > >> > apache-release (
> > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
> > > >> > -> [Help 1]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [ERROR]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven
> with
> > > >> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Ok so what is the output of your build now ?

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 17:11 Carlos Rovira 
napisał(a):

> Hi Piotr,
> since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the
> sending.
> The only difference is the file exposed in my last email
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Carlos,
> >
> > Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and post
> > links.
> >
> > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> > >
> > > this is what I have in my .m2
> > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> > >
> > >
> > > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> > >
> > > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> > >
> > > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> > >
> > > I'll try to build now with his layout
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > >> Carlos,
> > >>
> > >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from
> > your
> > >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually
> into
> > >> Maven folder and try again.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Piotr
> > >>
> > >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
> > >> napisał(a):
> > >>
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the
> same
> > >> > problem with flash player as always:
> > >> >
> > >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> > >> 1.0/1.0
> > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> > 1.0/1.0
> > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> > 1.0/1.0
> > >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from
> central:
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> > >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> > >> >
> > 
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS
> [
> > >> > 6.206 s]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS
> > >> [01:24
> > >> > min]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS
> [
> > >> > 3.174 s]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS
> [
> > >> > 58.423 s]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE
> [
> > >> > 8.802 s]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO]
> > >> >
> > 
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO]
> > >> >
> > 
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO]
> > >> >
> > 
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not
> resolve
> > >> > dependencies for project
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> > >> > Could not find artifact
> > com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> > >> in
> > >> > apache-release (
> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
> > >> > -> [Help 1]
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR]
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> > >> the -e
> > >> > switch.
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug
> logging.
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR]
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible
> solutions,
> > >> > please read the following articles:
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR] [Help 1]
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR]
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with
> > the
> > >> > command
> > >> >
> > >> > [ERROR]  

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Piotr,
since finally layouts are the same, I think is not worth it to do the
sending.
The only difference is the file exposed in my last email

El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:47, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and post
> links.
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Piotr and I discover off list the following:
> >
> > this is what I have in my .m2
> > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
> >
> >
> > and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
> >
> > [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
> >
> > how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
> >
> > I'll try to build now with his layout
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> >> Carlos,
> >>
> >> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from
> your
> >> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually into
> >> Maven folder and try again.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Piotr
> >>
> >> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
> >> napisał(a):
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
> >> > problem with flash player as always:
> >> >
> >> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> >> 1.0/1.0
> >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> 1.0/1.0
> >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
> 1.0/1.0
> >> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
> >> >
> >>
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> >> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> >> > 6.206 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS
> >> [01:24
> >> > min]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> >> > 3.174 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> >> > 58.423 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
> >> > 8.802 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
> >> > dependencies for project
> org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> >> > Could not find artifact
> com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> >> in
> >> > apache-release (
> >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
> >> > -> [Help 1]
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR]
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> >> the -e
> >> > switch.
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR]
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> >> > please read the following articles:
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] [Help 1]
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR]
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with
> the
> >> > command
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > BUILD FAILED
> >> >
> >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The
> >> following
> >> > error occurred while executing this line:
> >> >
> >> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:789: exec
> >> returned:
> >> > 1
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Total time: 40 minutes 58 seconds
> >> >
> >> > macbookpro:testrc2 carlosrovira$
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Carlos,

Mailing list won't allow post screenshot. Upload them somewhere and post
links.

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 16:27 Carlos Rovira 
napisał(a):

> Hi all,
>
> Piotr and I discover off list the following:
>
> this is what I have in my .m2
> [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
>
>
> and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
>
> [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
>
> how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
>
> I'll try to build now with his layout
>
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Carlos,
>>
>> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from your
>> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually into
>> Maven folder and try again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
>> > problem with flash player as always:
>> >
>> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
>> 1.0/1.0
>> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
>> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
>> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
>> >
>> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
>> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
>> > 6.206 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS
>> [01:24
>> > min]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
>> > 3.174 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
>> > 58.423 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
>> > 8.802 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
>> >
>> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
>> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
>> > Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
>> in
>> > apache-release (
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
>> > -> [Help 1]
>> >
>> > [ERROR]
>> >
>> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
>> the -e
>> > switch.
>> >
>> > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
>> >
>> > [ERROR]
>> >
>> > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
>> > please read the following articles:
>> >
>> > [ERROR] [Help 1]
>> >
>> >
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
>> >
>> > [ERROR]
>> >
>> > [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
>> > command
>> >
>> > [ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler
>> >
>> >
>> > BUILD FAILED
>> >
>> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The
>> following
>> > error occurred while executing this line:
>> >
>> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:789: exec
>> returned:
>> > 1
>> >
>> >
>> > Total time: 40 minutes 58 seconds
>> >
>> > macbookpro:testrc2 carlosrovira$
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 12:39, Piotr Zarzycki (<
>> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>> >
>> > > Hey Carlos,
>> > >
>> > > Answers inline.
>> > >
>> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 12:34 Carlos Rovira 
>> > > napisał(a):
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Piotr,
>> > > >
>> > > > I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow:
>> > > >
>> > > > 1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's
>> > > another
>> > > > way?
>> > > >
>> > > Yes. You can also try to modify maven target and add to each exec run
>> -s
>> > > "path to your settings"
>> > >
>> > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi,

sorry, but just notice that both layouts are exactly the same :?
The only change is in

playerglobal-20.0.pom.lastUpdated

Piotrs is:

#NOTE: This is an Aether internal implementation file, its format can be
changed without prior notice.
#Tue Aug 13 05:59:44 CEST 2019
https\://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/.error=
https\://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/.lastUpdated=1565668784011
https\://
repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/.lastUpdated=1565668783757
https\://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/.error=


and mine is:


#NOTE: This is a Maven Resolver internal implementation file, its format
can be changed without prior notice.
#Wed May 22 20:31:44 CEST 2019
https\://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/.lastUpdated=1558549904792
https\://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/.error=









El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:27, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:

> Hi all,
>
> Piotr and I discover off list the following:
>
> this is what I have in my .m2
> [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]
>
>
> and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:
>
> [image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]
>
> how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?
>
> I'll try to build now with his layout
>
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
>> Carlos,
>>
>> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from your
>> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually into
>> Maven folder and try again.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>>
>> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
>> napisał(a):
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
>> > problem with flash player as always:
>> >
>> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1):
>> 1.0/1.0
>> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
>> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
>> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
>> >
>> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
>> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
>> > 6.206 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS
>> [01:24
>> > min]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
>> > 3.174 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
>> > 58.423 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
>> > 8.802 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
>> >
>> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> > 
>> >
>> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
>> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
>> > Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
>> in
>> > apache-release (
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
>> > -> [Help 1]
>> >
>> > [ERROR]
>> >
>> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
>> the -e
>> > switch.
>> >
>> > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
>> >
>> > [ERROR]
>> >
>> > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
>> > please read the following articles:
>> >
>> > [ERROR] [Help 1]
>> >
>> >
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
>> >
>> > [ERROR]
>> >
>> > [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
>> > command
>> >
>> > [ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler
>> >
>> >
>> > BUILD FAILED
>> >
>> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The
>> following
>> > error occurred while executing this line:
>> >
>> > 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi all,

Piotr and I discover off list the following:

this is what I have in my .m2
[image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.11.04.png]


and this the Pitro's package layout that sent me off list:

[image: Captura de pantalla 2019-09-23 a las 16.12.19.png]

how is possible Piotr and I get different layouts?

I'll try to build now with his layout





El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 16:04, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Carlos,
>
> It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from your
> log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually into
> Maven folder and try again.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
> > problem with flash player as always:
> >
> > 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> > MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> > MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> > (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> > 6.206 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS
> [01:24
> > min]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> > 3.174 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> > 58.423 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
> > 8.802 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
> >
> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> > Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> in
> > apache-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
> > -> [Help 1]
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> -e
> > switch.
> >
> > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> > please read the following articles:
> >
> > [ERROR] [Help 1]
> >
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
> > command
> >
> > [ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler
> >
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> >
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The
> following
> > error occurred while executing this line:
> >
> > /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:789: exec
> returned:
> > 1
> >
> >
> > Total time: 40 minutes 58 seconds
> >
> > macbookpro:testrc2 carlosrovira$
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 12:39, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hey Carlos,
> > >
> > > Answers inline.
> > >
> > > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 12:34 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi Piotr,
> > > >
> > > > I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow:
> > > >
> > > > 1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's
> > > another
> > > > way?
> > > >
> > > Yes. You can also try to modify maven target and add to each exec run
> -s
> > > "path to your settings"
> > >
> > >
> > > > 2.- should I remove all my env vars in my .bash_profile?
> > > >
> > > Don't touch it.
> > >
> > >
> > > > 3.- I assume I must run the command: "ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml
> > > > -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=2" inside the folder I created with the
> > > > Approve xml file in it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes. I'm running it 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Carlos,

It's not exactly the same, cause my settings eliminate one issue from your
log. I have send you player global off list - just put it manually into
Maven folder and try again.

Thanks,
Piotr

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 13:50 Carlos Rovira 
napisał(a):

> Hi,
>
> sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
> problem with flash player as always:
>
> 0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
> MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
> (1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]
> 
>
> [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
>
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> 6.206 s]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [01:24
> min]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> 3.174 s]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> 58.423 s]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
> 8.802 s]
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>
> [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
>
> [INFO]
> 
>
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>
> [INFO]
> 
>
> [INFO] Total time:  02:51 min
>
> [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00
>
> [INFO]
> 
>
> [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
> dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
> apache-release (
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
> -> [Help 1]
>
> [ERROR]
>
> [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
> switch.
>
> [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
>
> [ERROR]
>
> [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> please read the following articles:
>
> [ERROR] [Help 1]
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
>
> [ERROR]
>
> [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
> command
>
> [ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler
>
>
> BUILD FAILED
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The following
> error occurred while executing this line:
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:789: exec returned:
> 1
>
>
> Total time: 40 minutes 58 seconds
>
> macbookpro:testrc2 carlosrovira$
>
>
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 12:39, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Hey Carlos,
> >
> > Answers inline.
> >
> > pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 12:34 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi Piotr,
> > >
> > > I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow:
> > >
> > > 1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's
> > another
> > > way?
> > >
> > Yes. You can also try to modify maven target and add to each exec run -s
> > "path to your settings"
> >
> >
> > > 2.- should I remove all my env vars in my .bash_profile?
> > >
> > Don't touch it.
> >
> >
> > > 3.- I assume I must run the command: "ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml
> > > -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=2" inside the folder I created with the
> > > Approve xml file in it.
> > >
> >
> > Yes. I'm running it with -DskipTests=true
> >
> >
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 10:20, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Hi Carlos,
> > > >
> > > > Here you have settings.xml which I'm using. Please try this one with
> > > > Approve script [1]. Pay attention in it that I have put there staging
> > > > artifacts link, so you know what I'm talking about in the next
> release.
> > > > According to what Josh is saying this settings with staging artifacts
> > > > shouldn't be required, but still I would like to try that idea.
> > > >
> > > > Don't forget in approve script modify target build_maven and change
> > exec
> > > > which is starting royale-asjs build to:
> > > >
> > > >  > > > 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi,

sorry to say that build failed. Here's the final log. Mostly the same
problem with flash player as always:

0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0 MBProgress (1): 1.0/1.0
MBProgress (1): 1.0 MBDownloaded from central:
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/de/jflex/jflex/1.6.0/jflex-1.6.0.jar
(1.0 MB at 3.7 MB/s)[INFO]


[INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:

[INFO]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
6.206 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [01:24
min]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
3.174 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
58.423 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
8.802 s]

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED

[INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED

[INFO]


[INFO] BUILD FAILURE

[INFO]


[INFO] Total time:  02:51 min

[INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-23T13:40:46+02:00

[INFO]


[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
apache-release (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases)
-> [Help 1]

[ERROR]

[ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the -e
switch.

[ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.

[ERROR]

[ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
please read the following articles:

[ERROR] [Help 1]
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException

[ERROR]

[ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
command

[ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler


BUILD FAILED

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:778: The following
error occurred while executing this line:

/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/ApproveRoyale.xml:789: exec returned:
1


Total time: 40 minutes 58 seconds

macbookpro:testrc2 carlosrovira$




El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 12:39, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hey Carlos,
>
> Answers inline.
>
> pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 12:34 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Piotr,
> >
> > I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow:
> >
> > 1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's
> another
> > way?
> >
> Yes. You can also try to modify maven target and add to each exec run -s
> "path to your settings"
>
>
> > 2.- should I remove all my env vars in my .bash_profile?
> >
> Don't touch it.
>
>
> > 3.- I assume I must run the command: "ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml
> > -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=2" inside the folder I created with the
> > Approve xml file in it.
> >
>
> Yes. I'm running it with -DskipTests=true
>
>
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> > El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 10:20, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Hi Carlos,
> > >
> > > Here you have settings.xml which I'm using. Please try this one with
> > > Approve script [1]. Pay attention in it that I have put there staging
> > > artifacts link, so you know what I'm talking about in the next release.
> > > According to what Josh is saying this settings with staging artifacts
> > > shouldn't be required, but still I would like to try that idea.
> > >
> > > Don't forget in approve script modify target build_maven and change
> exec
> > > which is starting royale-asjs build to:
> > >
> > >  > > dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> > > failonerror="true" >
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> > > Let me know if it helps.
> > >
> > > [1] https://paste.apache.org/gfift
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > niedz., 22 wrz 2019 o 19:24 Carlos Rovira 
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > yes, I was not able to build even using -s settings-template.xml.
> > > > I tried adding it in the Approve xml workflow code and trying to
> build
> > > > directly with maven with a clean .m2
> > > > 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hey Carlos,

Answers inline.

pon., 23 wrz 2019 o 12:34 Carlos Rovira 
napisał(a):

> Hi Piotr,
>
> I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow:
>
> 1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's another
> way?
>
Yes. You can also try to modify maven target and add to each exec run -s
"path to your settings"


> 2.- should I remove all my env vars in my .bash_profile?
>
Don't touch it.


> 3.- I assume I must run the command: "ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml
> -Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=2" inside the folder I created with the
> Approve xml file in it.
>

Yes. I'm running it with -DskipTests=true


>
> thanks
>
>
> El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 10:20, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Hi Carlos,
> >
> > Here you have settings.xml which I'm using. Please try this one with
> > Approve script [1]. Pay attention in it that I have put there staging
> > artifacts link, so you know what I'm talking about in the next release.
> > According to what Josh is saying this settings with staging artifacts
> > shouldn't be required, but still I would like to try that idea.
> >
> > Don't forget in approve script modify target build_maven and change exec
> > which is starting royale-asjs build to:
> >
> >  > dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> > failonerror="true" >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > Let me know if it helps.
> >
> > [1] https://paste.apache.org/gfift
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > niedz., 22 wrz 2019 o 19:24 Carlos Rovira 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > yes, I was not able to build even using -s settings-template.xml.
> > > I tried adding it in the Approve xml workflow code and trying to build
> > > directly with maven with a clean .m2
> > > In exchange, If I try to build in my usual royale repo folder as usual
> > from
> > > clean, it works all ok
> > > As well I tried commenting/uncommenting environment vars in my
> > > .bash_profile
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El dom., 22 sept. 2019 a las 16:10, Josh Tynjala (<
> > > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > That was my original assumption, but it sounds like Carlos had issues
> > > > trying that.
> > > >
> > > > - Josh
> > > >
> > > > On Sunday, September 22, 2019, Piotr Zarzycki <
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > Josh,
> > > > >
> > > > > Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be
> > enough
> > > to
> > > > > get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Piotr
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:43 AM Josh Tynjala <
> > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> I'm guessing that the settings template isn't supposed to be
> > required
> > > > for
> > > > >> JS-only builds, similar to the other things discussed in this
> thread
> > > (or
> > > > >> the previous RC thread).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I know that this file is needed to download the proprietary Adobe
> > bits
> > > > >> (since Maven doesn't know where to find them by default), and that
> > > > seemed
> > > > >> to be where your build failed.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - Josh
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Saturday, September 21, 2019, Carlos Rovira <
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> > Thanks Josh,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy
> > here)
> > > > >> > I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But
> > this
> > > > means
> > > > >> > the instructions to build are wrong right?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script
> > > (mostly
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > same as trying to build with maven):
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install)
> @
> > > > >> > compiler-externc ---
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
> > > > >> > to
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > > > >> >
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Piotr,

I want to try now. To try this xml with Approve xml workflow:

1.- should I put it in my .m2 folder (and remove mine)? or there's another
way?
2.- should I remove all my env vars in my .bash_profile?
3.- I assume I must run the command: "ant -e -f ApproveRoyale.xml
-Drelease.version=0.9.6 -Drc=2" inside the folder I created with the
Approve xml file in it.

thanks


El lun., 23 sept. 2019 a las 10:20, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hi Carlos,
>
> Here you have settings.xml which I'm using. Please try this one with
> Approve script [1]. Pay attention in it that I have put there staging
> artifacts link, so you know what I'm talking about in the next release.
> According to what Josh is saying this settings with staging artifacts
> shouldn't be required, but still I would like to try that idea.
>
> Don't forget in approve script modify target build_maven and change exec
> which is starting royale-asjs build to:
>
>  dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> failonerror="true" >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> Let me know if it helps.
>
> [1] https://paste.apache.org/gfift
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> niedz., 22 wrz 2019 o 19:24 Carlos Rovira 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > yes, I was not able to build even using -s settings-template.xml.
> > I tried adding it in the Approve xml workflow code and trying to build
> > directly with maven with a clean .m2
> > In exchange, If I try to build in my usual royale repo folder as usual
> from
> > clean, it works all ok
> > As well I tried commenting/uncommenting environment vars in my
> > .bash_profile
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El dom., 22 sept. 2019 a las 16:10, Josh Tynjala (<
> > joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > That was my original assumption, but it sounds like Carlos had issues
> > > trying that.
> > >
> > > - Josh
> > >
> > > On Sunday, September 22, 2019, Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > Josh,
> > > >
> > > > Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be
> enough
> > to
> > > > get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:43 AM Josh Tynjala <
> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> I'm guessing that the settings template isn't supposed to be
> required
> > > for
> > > >> JS-only builds, similar to the other things discussed in this thread
> > (or
> > > >> the previous RC thread).
> > > >>
> > > >> I know that this file is needed to download the proprietary Adobe
> bits
> > > >> (since Maven doesn't know where to find them by default), and that
> > > seemed
> > > >> to be where your build failed.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Josh
> > > >>
> > > >> On Saturday, September 21, 2019, Carlos Rovira <
> > carlosrov...@apache.org
> > > >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >> > Thanks Josh,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy
> here)
> > > >> > I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But
> this
> > > means
> > > >> > the instructions to build are wrong right?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script
> > (mostly
> > > >> the
> > > >> > same as trying to build with maven):
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
> > > >> > compiler-externc ---
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> > > >> > to
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
> > > >> > to
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> > > >> > to
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] < org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler
> > > >> >>-
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler 0.9.6
> > > >> > [5/12]
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [INFO] [ jar
> > > >> > ]-
> > > >> >
> > > >> > [WARNING] The POM 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi Carlos,

Here you have settings.xml which I'm using. Please try this one with
Approve script [1]. Pay attention in it that I have put there staging
artifacts link, so you know what I'm talking about in the next release.
According to what Josh is saying this settings with staging artifacts
shouldn't be required, but still I would like to try that idea.

Don't forget in approve script modify target build_maven and change exec
which is starting royale-asjs build to:








Let me know if it helps.

[1] https://paste.apache.org/gfift

Thanks,
Piotr

niedz., 22 wrz 2019 o 19:24 Carlos Rovira 
napisał(a):

> Hi,
>
> yes, I was not able to build even using -s settings-template.xml.
> I tried adding it in the Approve xml workflow code and trying to build
> directly with maven with a clean .m2
> In exchange, If I try to build in my usual royale repo folder as usual from
> clean, it works all ok
> As well I tried commenting/uncommenting environment vars in my
> .bash_profile
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
> El dom., 22 sept. 2019 a las 16:10, Josh Tynjala (<
> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>)
> escribió:
>
> > That was my original assumption, but it sounds like Carlos had issues
> > trying that.
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> > On Sunday, September 22, 2019, Piotr Zarzycki  >
> > wrote:
> > > Josh,
> > >
> > > Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be enough
> to
> > > get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:43 AM Josh Tynjala 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I'm guessing that the settings template isn't supposed to be required
> > for
> > >> JS-only builds, similar to the other things discussed in this thread
> (or
> > >> the previous RC thread).
> > >>
> > >> I know that this file is needed to download the proprietary Adobe bits
> > >> (since Maven doesn't know where to find them by default), and that
> > seemed
> > >> to be where your build failed.
> > >>
> > >> - Josh
> > >>
> > >> On Saturday, September 21, 2019, Carlos Rovira <
> carlosrov...@apache.org
> > >
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Thanks Josh,
> > >> >
> > >> > I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy here)
> > >> > I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But this
> > means
> > >> > the instructions to build are wrong right?
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script
> (mostly
> > >> the
> > >> > same as trying to build with maven):
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
> > >> > compiler-externc ---
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> > >> > to
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
> > >> > to
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Installing
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> > >> > to
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] < org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler
> > >> >>-
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler 0.9.6
> > >> > [5/12]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] [ jar
> > >> > ]-
> > >> >
> > >> > [WARNING] The POM for
> com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> > is
> > >> > missing, no dependency information available
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO]
> > >> >
> > 
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS
> [
> > >> > 2.102 s]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS
> [
> > >> > 4.555 s]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS
> [
> > >> > 0.431 s]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS
> [
> > >> > 9.225 s]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE
> [
> > >> > 0.052 s]
> > >> >
> > >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX 

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi,

yes, I was not able to build even using -s settings-template.xml.
I tried adding it in the Approve xml workflow code and trying to build
directly with maven with a clean .m2
In exchange, If I try to build in my usual royale repo folder as usual from
clean, it works all ok
As well I tried commenting/uncommenting environment vars in my .bash_profile

thanks




El dom., 22 sept. 2019 a las 16:10, Josh Tynjala ()
escribió:

> That was my original assumption, but it sounds like Carlos had issues
> trying that.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Sunday, September 22, 2019, Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
> > Josh,
> >
> > Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be enough to
> > get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:43 AM Josh Tynjala 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I'm guessing that the settings template isn't supposed to be required
> for
> >> JS-only builds, similar to the other things discussed in this thread (or
> >> the previous RC thread).
> >>
> >> I know that this file is needed to download the proprietary Adobe bits
> >> (since Maven doesn't know where to find them by default), and that
> seemed
> >> to be where your build failed.
> >>
> >> - Josh
> >>
> >> On Saturday, September 21, 2019, Carlos Rovira  >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Thanks Josh,
> >> >
> >> > I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy here)
> >> > I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But this
> means
> >> > the instructions to build are wrong right?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script (mostly
> >> the
> >> > same as trying to build with maven):
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
> >> > compiler-externc ---
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Installing
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> >> > to
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Installing
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
> >> > to
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Installing
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> >> > to
> >> >
> >>
> >>
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] < org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler
> >> >>-
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler 0.9.6
> >> > [5/12]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] [ jar
> >> > ]-
> >> >
> >> > [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> is
> >> > missing, no dependency information available
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> >> > 2.102 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [
> >> > 4.555 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> >> > 0.431 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> >> > 9.225 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
> >> > 0.052 s]
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Total time:  16.690 s
> >> >
> >> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-21T15:33:35+02:00
> >> >
> >> > [INFO]
> >> >
> 
> >> >
> >> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on 

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Josh Tynjala]

That was my original assumption, but it sounds like Carlos had issues
trying that.

- Josh

On Sunday, September 22, 2019, Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:
> Josh,
>
> Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be enough to
> get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:43 AM Josh Tynjala 
> wrote:
>
>> I'm guessing that the settings template isn't supposed to be required for
>> JS-only builds, similar to the other things discussed in this thread (or
>> the previous RC thread).
>>
>> I know that this file is needed to download the proprietary Adobe bits
>> (since Maven doesn't know where to find them by default), and that seemed
>> to be where your build failed.
>>
>> - Josh
>>
>> On Saturday, September 21, 2019, Carlos Rovira 
>> wrote:
>> > Thanks Josh,
>> >
>> > I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy here)
>> > I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But this
means
>> > the instructions to build are wrong right?
>> >
>> >
>> > Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script (mostly
>> the
>> > same as trying to build with maven):
>> >
>> > [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
>> > compiler-externc ---
>> >
>> > [INFO] Installing
>> >
>>
>>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
>> > to
>> >
>>
>>
/Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
>> >
>> > [INFO] Installing
>> >
>>
>>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
>> > to
>> >
>>
>>
/Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom
>> >
>> > [INFO] Installing
>> >
>>
>>
/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
>> > to
>> >
>>
>>
/Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> >
>> > [INFO] < org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler
>> >>-
>> >
>> > [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler 0.9.6
>> > [5/12]
>> >
>> > [INFO] [ jar
>> > ]-
>> >
>> > [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
is
>> > missing, no dependency information available
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> >

>> >
>> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
>> > 2.102 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [
>> > 4.555 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
>> > 0.431 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
>> > 9.225 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
>> > 0.052 s]
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> >

>> >
>> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> >

>> >
>> > [INFO] Total time:  16.690 s
>> >
>> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-21T15:33:35+02:00
>> >
>> > [INFO]
>> >

>> >
>> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
>> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
>> > Failure to find com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases was cached
>> in
>> > the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the
update
>> > interval of apache-release has elapsed or updates are forced -> [Help
1]
>> >
>> > [ERROR]
>> >
>> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
the
>> -e
>> > switch.
>> >
>> > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
>> >
>> > [ERROR]
>> >
>> > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
>> > please read the 

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Josh,

Are you saying that settings-template from repository should be enough to
get stuff working for Carlos? I'm confused right now.

Thanks,
Piotr

On Sun, Sep 22, 2019, 1:43 AM Josh Tynjala 
wrote:

> I'm guessing that the settings template isn't supposed to be required for
> JS-only builds, similar to the other things discussed in this thread (or
> the previous RC thread).
>
> I know that this file is needed to download the proprietary Adobe bits
> (since Maven doesn't know where to find them by default), and that seemed
> to be where your build failed.
>
> - Josh
>
> On Saturday, September 21, 2019, Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
> > Thanks Josh,
> >
> > I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy here)
> > I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But this means
> > the instructions to build are wrong right?
> >
> >
> > Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script (mostly
> the
> > same as trying to build with maven):
> >
> > [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
> > compiler-externc ---
> >
> > [INFO] Installing
> >
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> > to
> >
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> >
> > [INFO] Installing
> >
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
> > to
> >
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom
> >
> > [INFO] Installing
> >
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> > to
> >
>
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] < org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler
> >>-
> >
> > [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler 0.9.6
> > [5/12]
> >
> > [INFO] [ jar
> > ]-
> >
> > [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 is
> > missing, no dependency information available
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> > 2.102 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [
> > 4.555 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> > 0.431 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> > 9.225 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
> > 0.052 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Total time:  16.690 s
> >
> > [INFO] Finished at: 2019-09-21T15:33:35+02:00
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: Could not resolve
> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> > Failure to find com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases was cached
> in
> > the local repository, resolution will not be reattempted until the update
> > interval of apache-release has elapsed or updates are forced -> [Help 1]
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> -e
> > switch.
> >
> > [ERROR] Re-run Maven using the -X switch to enable full debug logging.
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> > please read the following articles:
> >
> > [ERROR] [Help 1]
> >
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/DependencyResolutionException
> >
> > [ERROR]
> >
> > [ERROR] After correcting the problems, you can resume the build with the
> > command
> >
> > [ERROR]   mvn  -rf :compiler
> >
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> >

[Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

I provided you concrete info what to do, but You expected a solution -
that's a whole different story. :)

No problem I hope we will get vote from some one else.

Thanks,
Piotr

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 11:32 PM Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> HI Piotr,
>
> since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some concrete info,
> or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
> I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.
>
> Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7
>
> thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
> El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > You have example of such file in repository. Just based on that setup
> > staging link repository. Currently in that file you have Snapshot links
> and
> > release. Based on this you can setup staging.
> >
> > Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in the previous
> > releases.
> >
> > I'm not sure even if that is needed it's just I wanted to confirm that is
> > really not needed.
> >
> > Do you have player global setup env variable?
> >
> > If you won't figure out stuff I will share it on Monday.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 8:06 PM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Piort,
> > >
> > > can you share here the set of links to add to my .m2/settings.xml?
> > >
> > > thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Switching subject to discuss.
> > > >
> > > > Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging artifacts?
> And
> > > run
> > > > approve script again.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira  >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Curious thing is:
> > > > >
> > > > > if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:
> > > > >
> > > > > mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > with clean .m2 all ends properly.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-default/1.0-alpha-9-stable-1/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jar
> > > > > (194 kB at 290 kB/s)
> > > > >
> > > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > > >
> > https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/antlr/ST4/4.0.4/ST4-4.0.4.jar
> > > > > (237
> > > > > kB at 345 kB/s)
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing
> the
> > > > POMs:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > > dependencies
> > > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> > > > >
> > > > > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > > dependencies
> > > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> > > > >
> > > > >  @
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]*
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*]
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:0.9.6
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml)
> > > > > has 1 error
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > > dependencies
> > > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) ->
> > *[Help
> > > > 2]*
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*]
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:debugger:0.9.6
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/debugger/pom.xml)
> > > > > has 1 error
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > > dependencies
> > > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) ->
> > *[Help
> > > > 2]*
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*]
> > > > >
> > > > > [*ERROR*] To see 

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

HI Piotr,

since I have work to do on docs, I prefer to try with some concrete info,
or I'll end going like chicken without head :)
I can test with and without vars on my .bash_profile too.

Even we can release 0.9.6 and left this issues for 0.9.7

thanks

Carlos




El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 22:44, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> You have example of such file in repository. Just based on that setup
> staging link repository. Currently in that file you have Snapshot links and
> release. Based on this you can setup staging.
>
> Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in the previous
> releases.
>
> I'm not sure even if that is needed it's just I wanted to confirm that is
> really not needed.
>
> Do you have player global setup env variable?
>
> If you won't figure out stuff I will share it on Monday.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 8:06 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Piort,
> >
> > can you share here the set of links to add to my .m2/settings.xml?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Switching subject to discuss.
> > >
> > > Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging artifacts? And
> > run
> > > approve script again.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira 
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Curious thing is:
> > > >
> > > > if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:
> > > >
> > > > mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > with clean .m2 all ends properly.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-default/1.0-alpha-9-stable-1/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jar
> > > > (194 kB at 290 kB/s)
> > > >
> > > > Downloaded from central:
> > > >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/antlr/ST4/4.0.4/ST4-4.0.4.jar
> > > > (237
> > > > kB at 345 kB/s)
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the
> > > POMs:
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > dependencies
> > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> > > >
> > > > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > dependencies
> > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> > > >
> > > >  @
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]*
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:0.9.6
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml)
> > > > has 1 error
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > dependencies
> > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) ->
> *[Help
> > > 2]*
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:debugger:0.9.6
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/debugger/pom.xml)
> > > > has 1 error
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > > dependencies
> > > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) ->
> *[Help
> > > 2]*
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven
> with
> > > the
> > > > *-e* switch.
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug
> > > logging.
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*]
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] For more information about the errors and possible
> solutions,
> > > > please read the following articles:
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] *[Help 1]*
> > > >
> > >
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
> > > >
> > > > [*ERROR*] *[Help 2]*
> > > >
> > 

[Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

You have example of such file in repository. Just based on that setup
staging link repository. Currently in that file you have Snapshot links and
release. Based on this you can setup staging.

Apart of that I have shared such file some time ago in the previous
releases.

I'm not sure even if that is needed it's just I wanted to confirm that is
really not needed.

Do you have player global setup env variable?

If you won't figure out stuff I will share it on Monday.

Thanks,
Piotr

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 8:06 PM Carlos Rovira  wrote:

> Hi Piort,
>
> can you share here the set of links to add to my .m2/settings.xml?
>
> thanks
>
>
>
>
> El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Switching subject to discuss.
> >
> > Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging artifacts? And
> run
> > approve script again.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Curious thing is:
> > >
> > > if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:
> > >
> > > mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install
> > >
> > >
> > > with clean .m2 all ends properly.
> > >
> > >
> > > if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:
> > >
> > >
> > > Downloaded from central:
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-default/1.0-alpha-9-stable-1/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jar
> > > (194 kB at 290 kB/s)
> > >
> > > Downloaded from central:
> > > https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/antlr/ST4/4.0.4/ST4-4.0.4.jar
> > > (237
> > > kB at 345 kB/s)
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the
> > POMs:
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > dependencies
> > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> > >
> > > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > dependencies
> > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> > >
> > >  @
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]*
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*]
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:0.9.6
> > >
> > >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml)
> > > has 1 error
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > dependencies
> > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help
> > 2]*
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*]
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:debugger:0.9.6
> > >
> > >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/debugger/pom.xml)
> > > has 1 error
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> > dependencies
> > > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > > apache-plugins-release (
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help
> > 2]*
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*]
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> > the
> > > *-e* switch.
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug
> > logging.
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*]
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> > > please read the following articles:
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] *[Help 1]*
> > >
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] *[Help 2]*
> > >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginManagerException
> > >
> > > macbookpro:royale-compiler carlosrovira$
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > this time because I run without profiles main,utils
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 17:40, Carlos Rovira (<
> > > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > > Josh,
> > > >
> > > > with a clean .m2, just tried in "royale-compiler" folder to run
> (after
> > > mvn
> > > > clean install -P -main,utils):
> > > >
> > > > mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And still fail trying to get flash player 20.0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: 

Re: [Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Piort,

can you share here the set of links to add to my .m2/settings.xml?

thanks




El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 19:02, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Switching subject to discuss.
>
> Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging artifacts? And run
> approve script again.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Curious thing is:
> >
> > if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:
> >
> > mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install
> >
> >
> > with clean .m2 all ends properly.
> >
> >
> > if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:
> >
> >
> > Downloaded from central:
> >
> >
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-default/1.0-alpha-9-stable-1/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jar
> > (194 kB at 290 kB/s)
> >
> > Downloaded from central:
> > https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/antlr/ST4/4.0.4/ST4-4.0.4.jar
> > (237
> > kB at 345 kB/s)
> >
> > [*ERROR*] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the
> POMs:
> >
> > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> dependencies
> > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > apache-plugins-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> >
> > [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> dependencies
> > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > apache-plugins-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
> >
> >  @
> >
> > [*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]*
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:0.9.6
> >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml)
> > has 1 error
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> dependencies
> > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > apache-plugins-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help
> 2]*
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:debugger:0.9.6
> >
> >
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/debugger/pom.xml)
> > has 1 error
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> > net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its
> dependencies
> > could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> > org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> > apache-plugins-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help
> 2]*
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> the
> > *-e* switch.
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug
> logging.
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> > please read the following articles:
> >
> > [*ERROR*] *[Help 1]*
> >
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
> >
> > [*ERROR*] *[Help 2]*
> > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginManagerException
> >
> > macbookpro:royale-compiler carlosrovira$
> >
> >
> >
> > this time because I run without profiles main,utils
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 17:40, Carlos Rovira (<
> > carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> > escribió:
> >
> > > Josh,
> > >
> > > with a clean .m2, just tried in "royale-compiler" folder to run (after
> > mvn
> > > clean install -P -main,utils):
> > >
> > > mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install
> > >
> > >
> > > And still fail trying to get flash player 20.0
> > >
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. *FAILURE*
> > > [  9.009 s]
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*]
> > >
> >
> **
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*]
> > >
> >
> 

[Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Carlos,

Whenever you reply you need to edit subject to make sure that you
responding to the right thread. Gmail issue.

Thanks,
Piotr

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 5:40 PM Carlos Rovira  wrote:

> Josh,
>
> with a clean .m2, just tried in "royale-compiler" folder to run (after mvn
> clean install -P -main,utils):
>
> mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install
>
>
> And still fail trying to get flash player 20.0
>
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. *FAILURE* [
> 9.009 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*INFO*] Total time:  02:17 min
>
> [*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T17:35:48+02:00
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not resolve
> dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
> apache-release (
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
> )* -> *[Help
> 1]*
>
>
>
>
>
> El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 17:25, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> escribió:
>
> > Thanks Josh,
> >
> > I just tried with Approve xml and get similar results (I copy here)
> > I'll try using the setting, I forgot completely about it.. But this means
> > the instructions to build are wrong right?
> >
> >
> > Here's my console output after try with the Approve xml script (mostly
> the
> > same as trying to build with maven):
> >
> > [INFO] --- maven-install-plugin:2.5.2:install (default-install) @
> > compiler-externc ---
> >
> > [INFO] Installing
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> > to
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.jar
> >
> > [INFO] Installing
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/pom.xml
> > to
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6.pom
> >
> > [INFO] Installing
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/testrc2/apache-royale-0.9.6-maven-src/royale-compiler/compiler-externc/target/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> > to
> >
> /Users/carlosrovira/.m2/repository/org/apache/royale/compiler/compiler-externc/0.9.6/compiler-externc-0.9.6-tests.jar
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] < org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler
> > >-
> >
> > [INFO] Building Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler 0.9.6
> > [5/12]
> >
> > [INFO] [ jar
> > ]-
> >
> > [WARNING] The POM for com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 is
> > missing, no dependency information available
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:
> >
> > [INFO]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  SUCCESS [
> > 2.102 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... SUCCESS [
> > 4.555 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  SUCCESS [
> > 0.431 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... SUCCESS [
> > 9.225 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. FAILURE [
> > 0.052 s]
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . SKIPPED
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 
> >
> > [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> >
> > [INFO]
> > 

[Discuss] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Switching subject to discuss.

Carlos can you put in your settings link toavem staging artifacts? And run
approve script again.

Thanks,
Piotr

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 6:49 PM Carlos Rovira  wrote:

> Curious thing is:
>
> if I run in my source tree royale-compiler folder this:
>
> mvn -s settings-template.xml -DskipTests clean install
>
>
> with clean .m2 all ends properly.
>
>
> if I run it in the downloaded RC2 folder it fails:
>
>
> Downloaded from central:
>
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/codehaus/plexus/plexus-container-default/1.0-alpha-9-stable-1/plexus-container-default-1.0-alpha-9-stable-1.jar
> (194 kB at 290 kB/s)
>
> Downloaded from central:
> https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2/org/antlr/ST4/4.0.4/ST4-4.0.4.jar
> (237
> kB at 345 kB/s)
>
> [*ERROR*] [ERROR] Some problems were encountered while processing the POMs:
>
> [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies
> could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> apache-plugins-release (
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
>
> [ERROR] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies
> could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> apache-plugins-release (
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) @
>
>  @
>
> [*ERROR*] The build could not read 2 projects -> *[Help 1]*
>
> [*ERROR*]
>
> [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:0.9.6
>
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/compiler/pom.xml)
> has 1 error
>
> [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies
> could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> apache-plugins-release (
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help 2]*
>
> [*ERROR*]
>
> [*ERROR*]   The project org.apache.royale.compiler:debugger:0.9.6
>
> (/Users/carlosrovira/Downloads/apache-royale-0.9.6-src/royale-compiler/debugger/pom.xml)
> has 1 error
>
> [*ERROR*] Unresolveable build extension: Plugin
> net.sourceforge.jburg:jburg-maven-plugin:1.10.4 or one of its dependencies
> could not be resolved: Could not find artifact
> org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler-jburg-types:jar:1.1.0 in
> apache-plugins-release (
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases) -> *[Help 2]*
>
> [*ERROR*]
>
> [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> *-e* switch.
>
> [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug logging.
>
> [*ERROR*]
>
> [*ERROR*] For more information about the errors and possible solutions,
> please read the following articles:
>
> [*ERROR*] *[Help 1]*
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/ProjectBuildingException
>
> [*ERROR*] *[Help 2]*
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/PluginManagerException
>
> macbookpro:royale-compiler carlosrovira$
>
>
>
> this time because I run without profiles main,utils
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 17:40, Carlos Rovira (<
> carlosrov...@apache.org>)
> escribió:
>
> > Josh,
> >
> > with a clean .m2, just tried in "royale-compiler" folder to run (after
> mvn
> > clean install -P -main,utils):
> >
> > mvn -s settings-template.xml clean install
> >
> >
> > And still fail trying to get flash player 20.0
> >
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. *FAILURE*
> > [  9.009 s]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*INFO*] Total time:  02:17 min
> >
> > [*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T17:35:48+02:00
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not resolve
> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> > Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> in
> > apache-release (
> 

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

If I'm correct approval scripts do both. Try and report if you have any
problems. Remember about Josh's modifications.

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 2:41 PM Carlos Rovira  wrote:

> Hi Piotr, I'm not using the Approval script xml, I'm building with Maven as
> instructions report.
> I can use Approval script too but I think that will be another way to do
> things (and another will be ANT build too).
>
>
> El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 13:48, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Hmm...Approval script is building stuff for you by Maven. Modify it as
> Josh
> > suggested and run according to instruction in Voting thread.
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 1:06 PM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > having the time to try RC2. I'm having the following issues. In RC1 I
> > tried
> > > ANT and all went ok. Know as Piotr suggest I'm trying to build with
> Maven
> > > with a clean(empty) .m2.
> > >
> > > packaged to test in RC2 is: apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
> > >
> > > Instructions in src are the following:
> > >
> > > Building Royale With Apache Maven
> > >
> > > =
> > >
> > >
> > > Royale requires Maven 3.3.9 or greater to be installed on your
> computer.
> > >
> > >
> > > To build Royale with Apache Maven, run Maven in the 3 folders as
> follows:
> > >
> > >
> > > royale-compiler:  mvn clean install -P -main,utils
> > >
> > > royale-compiler:  mvn clean install
> > >
> > > royale-typedefs:  mvn clean install
> > >
> > > royale-asjs:  mvn clean install
> > >
> > >
> > > When complete, you should be able to use the Maven archetypes in
> > > royale-asjs/archetypes
> > >
> > > to build Royale applications.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >  from downloaded src/royale-compiler folder I run first:
> > >
> > > mvn clean install -P -main,utils
> > >
> > > This was ok
> > >
> > > Then in the same compiler folder run:
> > >
> > > mvn clean install
> > >
> > > This time I get this error:
> > >
> > >
> > > [*INFO*]
> > >
> >
> **
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*]
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 
> *SUCCESS* [
> > > 1.763 s]
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... *SUCCESS*
> > > [01:07 min]
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils 
> *SUCCESS* [
> > > 2.307 s]
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ...
> *SUCCESS* [
> > > 49.839 s]
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler ..
> *FAILURE* [
> > > 8.878 s]
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . *SKIPPED*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*]
> > >
> >
> **
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*
> > >
> > > [*INFO*]
> > >
> >
> **
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Total time:  02:18 min
> > >
> > > [*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T12:51:06+02:00
> > >
> > > [*INFO*]
> > >
> >
> **
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not
> resolve
> > > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> > > Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> > in
> > > apache-release (
> > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
> > > )* ->
> > *[Help
> > > 1]*
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*]
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> > the
> > > *-e* switch.
> > >
> > > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug
> > logging.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > El vie., 20 sept. 2019 a las 18:24, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> > >
> > > > Yes sure. I would like to hear from others what they think.
> > > >
> > > > Personally much worst to me is the fact that we didn't release SDK in
> > > > several months. I would rather spend 5 minutes on writing email to
> > > instruct
> > > > user who has problem with building SDK than spend another 4 hours on
> > > > preparing and testing another RC - even if someone is paying me for
> > that.
> > > >
> > > > Let's hear from others.

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Piotr, I'm not using the Approval script xml, I'm building with Maven as
instructions report.
I can use Approval script too but I think that will be another way to do
things (and another will be ANT build too).


El sáb., 21 sept. 2019 a las 13:48, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hmm...Approval script is building stuff for you by Maven. Modify it as Josh
> suggested and run according to instruction in Voting thread.
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 1:06 PM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > having the time to try RC2. I'm having the following issues. In RC1 I
> tried
> > ANT and all went ok. Know as Piotr suggest I'm trying to build with Maven
> > with a clean(empty) .m2.
> >
> > packaged to test in RC2 is: apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
> >
> > Instructions in src are the following:
> >
> > Building Royale With Apache Maven
> >
> > =
> >
> >
> > Royale requires Maven 3.3.9 or greater to be installed on your computer.
> >
> >
> > To build Royale with Apache Maven, run Maven in the 3 folders as follows:
> >
> >
> > royale-compiler:  mvn clean install -P -main,utils
> >
> > royale-compiler:  mvn clean install
> >
> > royale-typedefs:  mvn clean install
> >
> > royale-asjs:  mvn clean install
> >
> >
> > When complete, you should be able to use the Maven archetypes in
> > royale-asjs/archetypes
> >
> > to build Royale applications.
> >
> >
> >
> >  from downloaded src/royale-compiler folder I run first:
> >
> > mvn clean install -P -main,utils
> >
> > This was ok
> >
> > Then in the same compiler folder run:
> >
> > mvn clean install
> >
> > This time I get this error:
> >
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:*
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  *SUCCESS* [
> > 1.763 s]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... *SUCCESS*
> > [01:07 min]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  *SUCCESS* [
> > 2.307 s]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... *SUCCESS* [
> > 49.839 s]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. *FAILURE* [
> > 8.878 s]
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . *SKIPPED*
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*INFO*] Total time:  02:18 min
> >
> > [*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T12:51:06+02:00
> >
> > [*INFO*]
> >
> **
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not resolve
> > dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> > Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0
> in
> > apache-release (
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
> > )* ->
> *[Help
> > 1]*
> >
> > [*ERROR*]
> >
> > [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with
> the
> > *-e* switch.
> >
> > [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug
> logging.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > El vie., 20 sept. 2019 a las 18:24, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> > piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > > Yes sure. I would like to hear from others what they think.
> > >
> > > Personally much worst to me is the fact that we didn't release SDK in
> > > several months. I would rather spend 5 minutes on writing email to
> > instruct
> > > user who has problem with building SDK than spend another 4 hours on
> > > preparing and testing another RC - even if someone is paying me for
> that.
> > >
> > > Let's hear from others.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 18:18 Alex Harui 
> > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > I don't know.  Would be nice to get other's opinions.  We make these
> > > > attempts to lower the effort to get the source and work with it, so
> > when
> > > > that workflow isn't working it doesn't make us look good.  FWIW, if
> you
> > > > clone the repo and try to build without the Adobe stuff, that should
> > > > probably fail the same way.
> > > >
> > > > -Alex
> > > >
> > > > On 9/19/19, 

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hmm...Approval script is building stuff for you by Maven. Modify it as Josh
suggested and run according to instruction in Voting thread.

On Sat, Sep 21, 2019, 1:06 PM Carlos Rovira  wrote:

> Hi,
>
> having the time to try RC2. I'm having the following issues. In RC1 I tried
> ANT and all went ok. Know as Piotr suggest I'm trying to build with Maven
> with a clean(empty) .m2.
>
> packaged to test in RC2 is: apache-royale-0.9.6-src.tar.gz
>
> Instructions in src are the following:
>
> Building Royale With Apache Maven
>
> =
>
>
> Royale requires Maven 3.3.9 or greater to be installed on your computer.
>
>
> To build Royale with Apache Maven, run Maven in the 3 folders as follows:
>
>
> royale-compiler:  mvn clean install -P -main,utils
>
> royale-compiler:  mvn clean install
>
> royale-typedefs:  mvn clean install
>
> royale-asjs:  mvn clean install
>
>
> When complete, you should be able to use the Maven archetypes in
> royale-asjs/archetypes
>
> to build Royale applications.
>
>
>
>  from downloaded src/royale-compiler folder I run first:
>
> mvn clean install -P -main,utils
>
> This was ok
>
> Then in the same compiler folder run:
>
> mvn clean install
>
> This time I get this error:
>
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*INFO*] *Reactor Summary for Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent 0.9.6:*
>
> [*INFO*]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Parent  *SUCCESS* [
> 1.763 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-Common ... *SUCCESS*
> [01:07 min]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Test Utils  *SUCCESS* [
> 2.307 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Externc ... *SUCCESS* [
> 49.839 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler .. *FAILURE* [
> 8.878 s]
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Compiler-JX ... *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: SWFUtils .. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: Debugger .. *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Compiler: OEM Layer . *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: RoyaleUnit Ant Tasks  *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*] Apache Royale: Royale Maven Plugin . *SKIPPED*
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*INFO*] *BUILD FAILURE*
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*INFO*] Total time:  02:18 min
>
> [*INFO*] Finished at: 2019-09-21T12:51:06+02:00
>
> [*INFO*]
> **
>
> [*ERROR*] Failed to execute goal on project compiler: *Could not resolve
> dependencies for project org.apache.royale.compiler:compiler:jar:0.9.6:
> Could not find artifact com.adobe.flash.framework:playerglobal:swc:20.0 in
> apache-release (
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases
> )* -> *[Help
> 1]*
>
> [*ERROR*]
>
> [*ERROR*] To see the full stack trace of the errors, re-run Maven with the
> *-e* switch.
>
> [*ERROR*] Re-run Maven using the *-X* switch to enable full debug logging.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> El vie., 20 sept. 2019 a las 18:24, Piotr Zarzycki (<
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Yes sure. I would like to hear from others what they think.
> >
> > Personally much worst to me is the fact that we didn't release SDK in
> > several months. I would rather spend 5 minutes on writing email to
> instruct
> > user who has problem with building SDK than spend another 4 hours on
> > preparing and testing another RC - even if someone is paying me for that.
> >
> > Let's hear from others.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 18:18 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
> >
> > > I don't know.  Would be nice to get other's opinions.  We make these
> > > attempts to lower the effort to get the source and work with it, so
> when
> > > that workflow isn't working it doesn't make us look good.  FWIW, if you
> > > clone the repo and try to build without the Adobe stuff, that should
> > > probably fail the same way.
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 9/19/19, 11:21 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Alex,
> > >
> > > I'm moving with topic here cause it's related. Maybe solution for
> not
> > > working build without some env. variables is just have section
> Known
> > > issues
> > > in our announcement?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> > >
> > > pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 08:19 Piotr Zarzycki  >
> > > napisał(a):
> > >
> > > > Hi Josh,
> > > >
> > > > Maybe you could commit that to develop?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > > >
> > > > czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala <
> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> > >

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Yes sure. I would like to hear from others what they think.

Personally much worst to me is the fact that we didn't release SDK in
several months. I would rather spend 5 minutes on writing email to instruct
user who has problem with building SDK than spend another 4 hours on
preparing and testing another RC - even if someone is paying me for that.

Let's hear from others.

Thanks,
Piotr

pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 18:18 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> I don't know.  Would be nice to get other's opinions.  We make these
> attempts to lower the effort to get the source and work with it, so when
> that workflow isn't working it doesn't make us look good.  FWIW, if you
> clone the repo and try to build without the Adobe stuff, that should
> probably fail the same way.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/19/19, 11:21 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I'm moving with topic here cause it's related. Maybe solution for not
> working build without some env. variables is just have section Known
> issues
> in our announcement?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 08:19 Piotr Zarzycki 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > Maybe you could commit that to develop?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala 
> > napisał(a):
> >
> >> If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the
> >> ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this
> section
> >> where the framework is built:
> >>
> >>  >> dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> >> failonerror="true">
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>
> >> --
> >> Josh Tynjala
> >> Bowler Hat LLC <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=seKWdtHYwJnr10AgVph8%2BOgYgk5746cRnEBpGNnKgwM%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> >> apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > This is the discussion thread.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Piotr
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0
> > <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0
> >*
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0
> <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0
> >*
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Alex Harui]

Correct.  ApproveRoyale.xml is not even in the source package.   I just didn't 
want Josh to push that change.

-Alex

On 9/20/19, 9:16 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Alex,

Second issue is a blocker only for someone who wanted to developing Royale
SDK, from my perspective it is not a blocker for a release.

Thanks,
Piotr

pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 18:13 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> Specifically, requiring the profile generate-swcs-for-swf will fail when
> running ApproveRoyale.xml in a js-only configuration.
>
> My commit last night detects env.AIR_HOME and selects the set of profiles
> to use.  I saw it work for both js-only and js-swf configurations.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/20/19, 9:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> What won't work exactly ? Build ? Or Royale for user IDE ?
>
> pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 17:57 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Please don't commit that.  It won't work for js-only.
> >
> > I pushed a solution for both last night.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/19/19, 11:20 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > Maybe you could commit that to develop?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala <
> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running
> the
> > > ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying
> this
> > section
> > > where the framework is built:
> > >
> > >  > > dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> > > failonerror="true">
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> > > --
> > > Josh Tynjala
> > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C295afd2376244230fd8c08d73de5f4ac%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045930174281142sdata=B8zm7Zv%2FWJGSSdLUH9bQo%2FgDnGRBHfy5ULTxufNqE5Q%3Dreserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C295afd2376244230fd8c08d73de5f4ac%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045930174281142sdata=sRFTeemaBdq%2BS83rK52vAIuAmWMmZJ42Agi9YDAjyQI%3Dreserved=0
> > <
> >
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C295afd2376244230fd8c08d73de5f4ac%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045930174281142sdata=sRFTeemaBdq%2BS83rK52vAIuAmWMmZJ42Agi9YDAjyQI%3Dreserved=0
> > >*
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C295afd2376244230fd8c08d73de5f4ac%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045930174281142sdata=sRFTeemaBdq%2BS83rK52vAIuAmWMmZJ42Agi9YDAjyQI%3Dreserved=0
> <
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C295afd2376244230fd8c08d73de5f4ac%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045930174281142sdata=sRFTeemaBdq%2BS83rK52vAIuAmWMmZJ42Agi9YDAjyQI%3Dreserved=0
> >*
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C295afd2376244230fd8c08d73de5f4ac%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045930174281142sdata=sRFTeemaBdq%2BS83rK52vAIuAmWMmZJ42Agi9YDAjyQI%3Dreserved=0

*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Alex Harui]

I don't know.  Would be nice to get other's opinions.  We make these attempts 
to lower the effort to get the source and work with it, so when that workflow 
isn't working it doesn't make us look good.  FWIW, if you clone the repo and 
try to build without the Adobe stuff, that should probably fail the same way.

-Alex

On 9/19/19, 11:21 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Alex,

I'm moving with topic here cause it's related. Maybe solution for not
working build without some env. variables is just have section Known issues
in our announcement?

Thanks,
Piotr

pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 08:19 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Hi Josh,
>
> Maybe you could commit that to develop?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala 
> napisał(a):
>
>> If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the
>> ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this section
>> where the framework is built:
>>
>> > dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
>> failonerror="true">
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> --
>> Josh Tynjala
>> Bowler Hat LLC 

>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
>> apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This is the discussion thread.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Piotr
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0
> 
*
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Cd794c4ef78a3433bc95e08d73d92bfc0%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572800498366sdata=J%2BSrhIzulD7eR%2FUUruVIgxma%2FXS4%2FdvmBF4r48qhSEQ%3Dreserved=0

*

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Alex,

Second issue is a blocker only for someone who wanted to developing Royale
SDK, from my perspective it is not a blocker for a release.

Thanks,
Piotr

pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 18:13 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> Specifically, requiring the profile generate-swcs-for-swf will fail when
> running ApproveRoyale.xml in a js-only configuration.
>
> My commit last night detects env.AIR_HOME and selects the set of profiles
> to use.  I saw it work for both js-only and js-swf configurations.
>
> -Alex
>
> On 9/20/19, 9:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> What won't work exactly ? Build ? Or Royale for user IDE ?
>
> pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 17:57 Alex Harui 
> napisał(a):
>
> > Please don't commit that.  It won't work for js-only.
> >
> > I pushed a solution for both last night.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 9/19/19, 11:20 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > Maybe you could commit that to develop?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
> >
> > czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala <
> joshtynj...@bowlerhat.dev>
> > napisał(a):
> >
> > > If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running
> the
> > > ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying
> this
> > section
> > > where the framework is built:
> > >
> > >  > > dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> > > failonerror="true">
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >
> > > --
> > > Josh Tynjala
> > > Bowler Hat LLC <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8a3cf242c0024b14fe6008d73de3ebee%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045921437938079sdata=n8xZarFdKuH32hNz2yLeDEVJnGmeQd5zExYQ2gC36Z8%3Dreserved=0
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> > > apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is the discussion thread.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Piotr
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8a3cf242c0024b14fe6008d73de3ebee%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045921437938079sdata=QeebXriRWQgKc05kJiui7YCon6Lee0vSc%2BosijEfwuU%3Dreserved=0
> > <
> >
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8a3cf242c0024b14fe6008d73de3ebee%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045921437938079sdata=QeebXriRWQgKc05kJiui7YCon6Lee0vSc%2BosijEfwuU%3Dreserved=0
> > >*
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8a3cf242c0024b14fe6008d73de3ebee%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045921437938079sdata=QeebXriRWQgKc05kJiui7YCon6Lee0vSc%2BosijEfwuU%3Dreserved=0
> <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8a3cf242c0024b14fe6008d73de3ebee%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045921437938079sdata=QeebXriRWQgKc05kJiui7YCon6Lee0vSc%2BosijEfwuU%3Dreserved=0
> >*
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Alex Harui]

Specifically, requiring the profile generate-swcs-for-swf will fail when 
running ApproveRoyale.xml in a js-only configuration.

My commit last night detects env.AIR_HOME and selects the set of profiles to 
use.  I saw it work for both js-only and js-swf configurations.

-Alex

On 9/20/19, 9:02 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

What won't work exactly ? Build ? Or Royale for user IDE ?

pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 17:57 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> Please don't commit that.  It won't work for js-only.
>
> I pushed a solution for both last night.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/19/19, 11:20 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> Maybe you could commit that to develop?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala 
> napisał(a):
>
> > If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the
> > ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this
> section
> > where the framework is built:
> >
> >  > dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> > failonerror="true">
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8a3cf242c0024b14fe6008d73de3ebee%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045921437938079sdata=n8xZarFdKuH32hNz2yLeDEVJnGmeQd5zExYQ2gC36Z8%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> > apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is the discussion thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8a3cf242c0024b14fe6008d73de3ebee%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045921437938079sdata=QeebXriRWQgKc05kJiui7YCon6Lee0vSc%2BosijEfwuU%3Dreserved=0
> <
> 
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8a3cf242c0024b14fe6008d73de3ebee%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045921437938079sdata=QeebXriRWQgKc05kJiui7YCon6Lee0vSc%2BosijEfwuU%3Dreserved=0
> >*
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C8a3cf242c0024b14fe6008d73de3ebee%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045921437938079sdata=QeebXriRWQgKc05kJiui7YCon6Lee0vSc%2BosijEfwuU%3Dreserved=0

*

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

What won't work exactly ? Build ? Or Royale for user IDE ?

pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 17:57 Alex Harui  napisał(a):

> Please don't commit that.  It won't work for js-only.
>
> I pushed a solution for both last night.
>
> Thanks,
> -Alex
>
> On 9/19/19, 11:20 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> Maybe you could commit that to develop?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala 
> napisał(a):
>
> > If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the
> > ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this
> section
> > where the framework is built:
> >
> >  > dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> > failonerror="true">
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > --
> > Josh Tynjala
> > Bowler Hat LLC <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbowlerhat.devdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce4ea4c5bfc0f479a8bfd08d73d92997c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572159032939sdata=BDj9pGPEd7LYnGt4k0uBrLS5gjGCv7CubuAD9NJN5wQ%3Dreserved=0
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> > apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This is the discussion thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Piotr
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce4ea4c5bfc0f479a8bfd08d73d92997c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572159032939sdata=Zw24uGCHtcSPLPDHwstsYWscS3AxqHmbhgmfIyPoRq0%3Dreserved=0
> <
> https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce4ea4c5bfc0f479a8bfd08d73d92997c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572159032939sdata=Zw24uGCHtcSPLPDHwstsYWscS3AxqHmbhgmfIyPoRq0%3Dreserved=0
> >*
>
>
>

-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Alex Harui]

Please don't commit that.  It won't work for js-only.

I pushed a solution for both last night.

Thanks,
-Alex

On 9/19/19, 11:20 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki"  wrote:

Hi Josh,

Maybe you could commit that to develop?

Thanks,
Piotr

czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala 
napisał(a):

> If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the
> ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this section
> where the framework is built:
>
>  dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> failonerror="true">
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC 

>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: 
*https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.patreon.com%2Fpiotrzarzyckidata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7Ce4ea4c5bfc0f479a8bfd08d73d92997c%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C637045572159032939sdata=Zw24uGCHtcSPLPDHwstsYWscS3AxqHmbhgmfIyPoRq0%3Dreserved=0

*

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi Alex,

I'm moving with topic here cause it's related. Maybe solution for not
working build without some env. variables is just have section Known issues
in our announcement?

Thanks,
Piotr

pt., 20 wrz 2019 o 08:19 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Hi Josh,
>
> Maybe you could commit that to develop?
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
> czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala 
> napisał(a):
>
>> If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the
>> ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this section
>> where the framework is built:
>>
>> > dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
>> failonerror="true">
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>> --
>> Josh Tynjala
>> Bowler Hat LLC 
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
>> apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This is the discussion thread.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Piotr
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi Josh,

Maybe you could commit that to develop?

Thanks,
Piotr

czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 18:19 Josh Tynjala 
napisał(a):

> If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the
> ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this section
> where the framework is built:
>
>  dir="${basedir}/${maven.package.url.name}/royale-asjs"
> failonerror="true">
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>
> --
> Josh Tynjala
> Bowler Hat LLC 
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
> apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This is the discussion thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Piotr
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Josh Tynjala]

If anyone else has problems with the Maven build when running the
ApproveRoyale.xml script, I was able to fix it by modifying this section
where the framework is built:








--
Josh Tynjala
Bowler Hat LLC 


On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:08 AM Apache Royale CI Server <
apacheroyal...@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is the discussion thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Btw. When you answering trough Gmail make sure by Editing Title to which
thread are responding in. Delete "RE", cause it probably will end up with
creating new thread.

czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 10:14 Piotr Zarzycki 
napisał(a):

> Hi Guys,
>
> RC2 ready to test. Josh provides in discuss thread how to get my keys to
> check signature.
>
> gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys D5C80F47
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr
>
>
> czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 10:08 Apache Royale CI Server <
> apacheroyal...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
>> This is the discussion thread.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Piotr
>
>
>
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*

[DISCUSS] Release Apache Royale 0.9.6 RC2

[Piotr Zarzycki]

Hi Guys,

RC2 ready to test. Josh provides in discuss thread how to get my keys to
check signature.

gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-keys D5C80F47

Thanks,
Piotr


czw., 19 wrz 2019 o 10:08 Apache Royale CI Server 
napisał(a):

> This is the discussion thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Piotr



-- 

Piotr Zarzycki

Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
*