Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Andrew Wetmore]

Thank you @Carlos Rovira 

On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:09 PM Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> this is from [1]
>
> Browser Support for ES5 (2009)
> BrowserVersionFrom Date
> Chrome 23 Sep 2012
> Firefox 21 Apr 2013
> IE 9* Mar 2011
> IE / Edge 10 Sep 2012
> Safari 6 Jul 2012
> Opera 15 Jul 2013
>
>
> [1] https://www.w3schools.com/js/js_versions.asp
>
> El lun., 5 ago. 2019 a las 11:31, Andrew Wetmore ()
> escribió:
>
> > Yes, I feel a little bit like a guest at some other group's dinner party.
> >
> > Any thoughts on the minimum versions of the various browsers that we
> > support?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:27 AM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > >
> > > El lun., 5 ago. 2019 a las 11:14, Andrew Wetmore ( >)
> > > escribió:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Do we really have a GUI page layout? Is that not more like what Flex
> > > > Builder had?
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yeah, you're right. I was thinking about "layouts" feature, but is
> really
> > > what you say.
> > > The problem with this grids is that sometimes is hard to imagine what
> the
> > > author wants to refer.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Carlos Rovira
> > > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Andrew,

this is from [1]

Browser Support for ES5 (2009)
BrowserVersionFrom Date
Chrome 23 Sep 2012
Firefox 21 Apr 2013
IE 9* Mar 2011
IE / Edge 10 Sep 2012
Safari 6 Jul 2012
Opera 15 Jul 2013


[1] https://www.w3schools.com/js/js_versions.asp

El lun., 5 ago. 2019 a las 11:31, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> Yes, I feel a little bit like a guest at some other group's dinner party.
>
> Any thoughts on the minimum versions of the various browsers that we
> support?
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:27 AM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > El lun., 5 ago. 2019 a las 11:14, Andrew Wetmore ()
> > escribió:
> >
> > >
> > > Do we really have a GUI page layout? Is that not more like what Flex
> > > Builder had?
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, you're right. I was thinking about "layouts" feature, but is really
> > what you say.
> > The problem with this grids is that sometimes is hard to imagine what the
> > author wants to refer.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Carlos Rovira
> > > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Andrew Wetmore]

Yes, I feel a little bit like a guest at some other group's dinner party.

Any thoughts on the minimum versions of the various browsers that we
support?

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:27 AM Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
>
> El lun., 5 ago. 2019 a las 11:14, Andrew Wetmore ()
> escribió:
>
> >
> > Do we really have a GUI page layout? Is that not more like what Flex
> > Builder had?
> >
>
> Yeah, you're right. I was thinking about "layouts" feature, but is really
> what you say.
> The problem with this grids is that sometimes is hard to imagine what the
> author wants to refer.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Andrew,

El lun., 5 ago. 2019 a las 11:14, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

>
> Do we really have a GUI page layout? Is that not more like what Flex
> Builder had?
>

Yeah, you're right. I was thinking about "layouts" feature, but is really
what you say.
The problem with this grids is that sometimes is hard to imagine what the
author wants to refer.

Thanks!


>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>
>
>
>

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Andrew Wetmore]

It is a start, at least.

Do we really have a GUI page layout? Is that not more like what Flex
Builder had?

On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:00 AM Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> Many Thanks Andrew, I think is a good start.
> Looking at the tables, sometimes is difficult to see if we fit in a cell or
> another, but we can get over it as we released next version. For now I
> think is ok, and the initial objetive is to be listed :)
>
> Thanks!
>
> El sáb., 3 ago. 2019 a las 22:47, Andrew Wetmore ()
> escribió:
>
> > I have added columns and rows for Apache Royale  to this page [1], and
> have
> > made a stab at providing data in the cells. I am sure I have missed a
> bunch
> > of features we can say YES about, and do not have anything for the
> earliest
> > versions of each browser Royale works with, so any improvements anyone
> can
> > suggest are most welcome.
> >
> > a
> >
> > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:46 AM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
> >
> > > This page [1] lists a bunch of features and functionality, and whether
> a
> > > given framework has/supports it. Can someone check my answers for
> Apache
> > > Royale?:
> > >
> > > Feature detection:
> > > DOM wrapped:
> > > Xml HTMLRequest data retrieval: YES
> > > Web socket
> > > Server push data retrieval
> > > Other data retrieval (xml, html, csv, atom)
> > > Drag and drop: YES
> > > Simple visual effects: YES
> > > Animation / advanced visual effects
> > > Back button support / history management
> > > Input form, widgets, validation: YES
> > > Grid: YES
> > > Hierarchical tree: YES
> > > Rich Text Editor: YES
> > > Autocompletion tools:
> > > HTML generation tools:
> > > Widgets / themeable, skinnable: YES
> > > GUI resizable panels and modal dialogs: YES???
> > > GUI page layout:
> > > Canvas support: YES
> > > Mobile/tablet support (touch support): YES
> > > Accessibility / Graceful degradation:
> > > ARIA compliant:
> > > Developer tools, visual design: [the current IDE support does not match
> > > this, does it?]
> > > Offline storage: YES
> > > Cross browser 2d vector graphics:
> > > Charting and dashboard: YES
> > > RTL support in UI components: YES
> > >
> > > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:15 AM Andrew Wetmore 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> This page lists framework compatibility with various browsers. What is
> > >> the earliest version of each of the following that the JS that Royale
> > >> (0.9.4) compiles can work with?
> > >>
> > >> IE
> > >> Firefox
> > >> Safari
> > >> Opera
> > >> Chrome
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:19 AM Carlos Rovira  >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for
> > >>> bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :)
> > >>>
> > >>> El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore (<
> cottag...@gmail.com
> > >)
> > >>> escribió:
> > >>>
> > >>> > That be me.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > I will take a look at it!
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> > >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > Hi Guys,
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I
> > >>> > remember
> > >>> > > that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add
> > there
> > >>> > > Royale ?
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > [1]
> > >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Thanks,
> > >>> > > --
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > >>> > > *
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>> >
> > >>> > --
> > >>> > Andrew Wetmore
> > >>> >
> > >>> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Carlos Rovira
> > >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Andrew Wetmore
> > >>
> > >> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Carlos Rovira]

Many Thanks Andrew, I think is a good start.
Looking at the tables, sometimes is difficult to see if we fit in a cell or
another, but we can get over it as we released next version. For now I
think is ok, and the initial objetive is to be listed :)

Thanks!

El sáb., 3 ago. 2019 a las 22:47, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> I have added columns and rows for Apache Royale  to this page [1], and have
> made a stab at providing data in the cells. I am sure I have missed a bunch
> of features we can say YES about, and do not have anything for the earliest
> versions of each browser Royale works with, so any improvements anyone can
> suggest are most welcome.
>
> a
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:46 AM Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
>
> > This page [1] lists a bunch of features and functionality, and whether a
> > given framework has/supports it. Can someone check my answers for Apache
> > Royale?:
> >
> > Feature detection:
> > DOM wrapped:
> > Xml HTMLRequest data retrieval: YES
> > Web socket
> > Server push data retrieval
> > Other data retrieval (xml, html, csv, atom)
> > Drag and drop: YES
> > Simple visual effects: YES
> > Animation / advanced visual effects
> > Back button support / history management
> > Input form, widgets, validation: YES
> > Grid: YES
> > Hierarchical tree: YES
> > Rich Text Editor: YES
> > Autocompletion tools:
> > HTML generation tools:
> > Widgets / themeable, skinnable: YES
> > GUI resizable panels and modal dialogs: YES???
> > GUI page layout:
> > Canvas support: YES
> > Mobile/tablet support (touch support): YES
> > Accessibility / Graceful degradation:
> > ARIA compliant:
> > Developer tools, visual design: [the current IDE support does not match
> > this, does it?]
> > Offline storage: YES
> > Cross browser 2d vector graphics:
> > Charting and dashboard: YES
> > RTL support in UI components: YES
> >
> > [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:15 AM Andrew Wetmore 
> wrote:
> >
> >> This page lists framework compatibility with various browsers. What is
> >> the earliest version of each of the following that the JS that Royale
> >> (0.9.4) compiles can work with?
> >>
> >> IE
> >> Firefox
> >> Safari
> >> Opera
> >> Chrome
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:19 AM Carlos Rovira 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for
> >>> bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :)
> >>>
> >>> El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore ( >)
> >>> escribió:
> >>>
> >>> > That be me.
> >>> >
> >>> > I will take a look at it!
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> >>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Hi Guys,
> >>> > >
> >>> > > What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I
> >>> > remember
> >>> > > that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add
> there
> >>> > > Royale ?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > [1]
> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks,
> >>> > > --
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >>> > > *
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Andrew Wetmore
> >>> >
> >>> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Carlos Rovira
> >>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew Wetmore
> >>
> >> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Carlos Rovira]

Other data retrieval (xml, html, csv, atom) : Yes, AMF
GUI page layout:YES

El vie., 2 ago. 2019 a las 14:46, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> This page [1] lists a bunch of features and functionality, and whether a
> given framework has/supports it. Can someone check my answers for Apache
> Royale?:
>
> Feature detection:
> DOM wrapped:
> Xml HTMLRequest data retrieval: YES
> Web socket
> Server push data retrieval
> Other data retrieval (xml, html, csv, atom)
> Drag and drop: YES
> Simple visual effects: YES
> Animation / advanced visual effects
> Back button support / history management
> Input form, widgets, validation: YES
> Grid: YES
> Hierarchical tree: YES
> Rich Text Editor: YES
> Autocompletion tools:
> HTML generation tools:
> Widgets / themeable, skinnable: YES
> GUI resizable panels and modal dialogs: YES???
> GUI page layout:
> Canvas support: YES
> Mobile/tablet support (touch support): YES
> Accessibility / Graceful degradation:
> ARIA compliant:
> Developer tools, visual design: [the current IDE support does not match
> this, does it?]
> Offline storage: YES
> Cross browser 2d vector graphics:
> Charting and dashboard: YES
> RTL support in UI components: YES
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:15 AM Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
>
> > This page lists framework compatibility with various browsers. What is
> the
> > earliest version of each of the following that the JS that Royale (0.9.4)
> > compiles can work with?
> >
> > IE
> > Firefox
> > Safari
> > Opera
> > Chrome
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:19 AM Carlos Rovira 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for
> >> bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :)
> >>
> >> El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore ( >)
> >> escribió:
> >>
> >> > That be me.
> >> >
> >> > I will take a look at it!
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> >> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Guys,
> >> > >
> >> > > What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I
> >> > remember
> >> > > that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add
> there
> >> > > Royale ?
> >> > >
> >> > > [1]
> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks,
> >> > > --
> >> > >
> >> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> >> > >
> >> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> >> > > *
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Andrew Wetmore
> >> >
> >> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Carlos Rovira
> >> http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Carlos Rovira]

Hi Andrew,

Apache Royale is ES5 right now. So there you should put the version where
the browser started to support ES5.
In the case of Jewel in TDJ I added with versions are supported since I
tested with Browserstack the minimum version for Jewel [1]

[1] https://apache.github.io/royale-docs/component-sets/jewel.html


El vie., 2 ago. 2019 a las 14:15, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> This page lists framework compatibility with various browsers. What is the
> earliest version of each of the following that the JS that Royale (0.9.4)
> compiles can work with?
>
> IE
> Firefox
> Safari
> Opera
> Chrome
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:19 AM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
> > Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for
> > bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :)
> >
> > El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore ()
> > escribió:
> >
> > > That be me.
> > >
> > > I will take a look at it!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >
> > > > What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I
> > > remember
> > > > that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add there
> > > > Royale ?
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > > >
> > > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > > *
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Andrew Wetmore
> > >
> > > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Carlos Rovira
> > http://about.me/carlosrovira
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Andrew Wetmore]

I have added columns and rows for Apache Royale  to this page [1], and have
made a stab at providing data in the cells. I am sure I have missed a bunch
of features we can say YES about, and do not have anything for the earliest
versions of each browser Royale works with, so any improvements anyone can
suggest are most welcome.

a

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:46 AM Andrew Wetmore  wrote:

> This page [1] lists a bunch of features and functionality, and whether a
> given framework has/supports it. Can someone check my answers for Apache
> Royale?:
>
> Feature detection:
> DOM wrapped:
> Xml HTMLRequest data retrieval: YES
> Web socket
> Server push data retrieval
> Other data retrieval (xml, html, csv, atom)
> Drag and drop: YES
> Simple visual effects: YES
> Animation / advanced visual effects
> Back button support / history management
> Input form, widgets, validation: YES
> Grid: YES
> Hierarchical tree: YES
> Rich Text Editor: YES
> Autocompletion tools:
> HTML generation tools:
> Widgets / themeable, skinnable: YES
> GUI resizable panels and modal dialogs: YES???
> GUI page layout:
> Canvas support: YES
> Mobile/tablet support (touch support): YES
> Accessibility / Graceful degradation:
> ARIA compliant:
> Developer tools, visual design: [the current IDE support does not match
> this, does it?]
> Offline storage: YES
> Cross browser 2d vector graphics:
> Charting and dashboard: YES
> RTL support in UI components: YES
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:15 AM Andrew Wetmore  wrote:
>
>> This page lists framework compatibility with various browsers. What is
>> the earliest version of each of the following that the JS that Royale
>> (0.9.4) compiles can work with?
>>
>> IE
>> Firefox
>> Safari
>> Opera
>> Chrome
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:19 AM Carlos Rovira 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for
>>> bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :)
>>>
>>> El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore ()
>>> escribió:
>>>
>>> > That be me.
>>> >
>>> > I will take a look at it!
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
>>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi Guys,
>>> > >
>>> > > What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I
>>> > remember
>>> > > that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add there
>>> > > Royale ?
>>> > >
>>> > > [1]
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks,
>>> > > --
>>> > >
>>> > > Piotr Zarzycki
>>> > >
>>> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>>> > > *
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Andrew Wetmore
>>> >
>>> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Carlos Rovira
>>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Wetmore
>>
>> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Andrew Wetmore]

This page [1] lists a bunch of features and functionality, and whether a
given framework has/supports it. Can someone check my answers for Apache
Royale?:

Feature detection:
DOM wrapped:
Xml HTMLRequest data retrieval: YES
Web socket
Server push data retrieval
Other data retrieval (xml, html, csv, atom)
Drag and drop: YES
Simple visual effects: YES
Animation / advanced visual effects
Back button support / history management
Input form, widgets, validation: YES
Grid: YES
Hierarchical tree: YES
Rich Text Editor: YES
Autocompletion tools:
HTML generation tools:
Widgets / themeable, skinnable: YES
GUI resizable panels and modal dialogs: YES???
GUI page layout:
Canvas support: YES
Mobile/tablet support (touch support): YES
Accessibility / Graceful degradation:
ARIA compliant:
Developer tools, visual design: [the current IDE support does not match
this, does it?]
Offline storage: YES
Cross browser 2d vector graphics:
Charting and dashboard: YES
RTL support in UI components: YES

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 9:15 AM Andrew Wetmore  wrote:

> This page lists framework compatibility with various browsers. What is the
> earliest version of each of the following that the JS that Royale (0.9.4)
> compiles can work with?
>
> IE
> Firefox
> Safari
> Opera
> Chrome
>
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:19 AM Carlos Rovira 
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for
>> bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :)
>>
>> El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore ()
>> escribió:
>>
>> > That be me.
>> >
>> > I will take a look at it!
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki <
>> piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Guys,
>> > >
>> > > What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I
>> > remember
>> > > that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add there
>> > > Royale ?
>> > >
>> > > [1]
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > --
>> > >
>> > > Piotr Zarzycki
>> > >
>> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
>> > > *
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Andrew Wetmore
>> >
>> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Carlos Rovira
>> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Andrew Wetmore]

This page lists framework compatibility with various browsers. What is the
earliest version of each of the following that the JS that Royale (0.9.4)
compiles can work with?

IE
Firefox
Safari
Opera
Chrome

On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:19 AM Carlos Rovira 
wrote:

> Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for
> bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :)
>
> El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore ()
> escribió:
>
> > That be me.
> >
> > I will take a look at it!
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki  >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Guys,
> > >
> > > What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I
> > remember
> > > that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add there
> > > Royale ?
> > >
> > > [1]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > --
> > >
> > > Piotr Zarzycki
> > >
> > > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > > *
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Carlos Rovira
> http://about.me/carlosrovira
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Carlos Rovira]

Yeah! Very important this kind of things for our future. Thanks for
bringing this and to Andrew for filling it! :)

El jue., 1 ago. 2019 a las 11:13, Andrew Wetmore ()
escribió:

> That be me.
>
> I will take a look at it!
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I
> remember
> > that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add there
> > Royale ?
> >
> > [1]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --
> >
> > Piotr Zarzycki
> >
> > Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> > *
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
http://about.me/carlosrovira

Re: Add Royale to Wiki: Comparison of JavaScript frameworks

[Andrew Wetmore]

That be me.

I will take a look at it!

On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:33 AM Piotr Zarzycki 
wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> What do you think about adding Royale to this comparision [1] ? I remember
> that someone from our Team was and Wiki editor, maybe could add there
> Royale ?
>
> [1]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_JavaScript_frameworks
>
> Thanks,
> --
>
> Piotr Zarzycki
>
> Patreon: *https://www.patreon.com/piotrzarzycki
> *
>


-- 
Andrew Wetmore

http://cottage14.blogspot.com/