Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen skrev: Ceki Gulcu skrev den 03-10-2008 21:53: Are there any remaining tasks? Thorbjørn is still working on agent instrumentation. Ralph has volunteered to add documentation about XLogger. The I think the agent instrumentation should not be announced until it is ready. In that regard I am quite interested in seeing what Real-World Code Ralph can throw at it :) Hi Ceki. I have spent quite some time figuring out how to handle logging with object parameters with rogue toString() implementations and have found it too hard for me to get right in code, so I have delegated it to the developer using it to exclude these classes from the logging configuration (cheap, but works) by saying so in the documentation. Also, it is a problem that unless explicitly told not to, also JRE classes are instrumented. I have considered adding an origin check so that you can disable/enable instrumentation based on which jar it comes from. Was the stuff you added lately to identify the jar from the patch, hard to work with? I also found a solution to this problem. Basically it is only instrument a class if the slf4j API classes are available to it - that has turned out to work well for my real-life situations. Also it is now robust against objects throwing exceptions when being toString'ed, as well as being able to show nested arrays of both objects and primitives. It has taken quite some time but I finally now has this in a state where it will work with the multi-threaded real-life legacy applications I have at work, so unless you hear otherwise I would like to have it announced in the next release of slf4j. I would appreciate your help in getting the jar file names right in the created manifest when you have the time. I currently hard code them but it would be very nice if they could be extracted from the dependencies section. -- Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen ...plus... Tubular Bells! ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
Hello Thorbjørn, Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen wrote: What is your current estimate for the 1.5.6 release? I would like to get logback 0.9.12 out the door first. SLF4J 1.5.6 will come later, probably in December. /Thorbjørn -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
Ceki Gulcu skrev: The html files on the slf4j site are *not* generated nor transformed. To have the same look and feel, each page includes javascript and css files. It is supposed to be extremely easy. Just have a look. Ok. Glad you kept it simple - it get rather confusing pretty easily. Once you modify a page, do cd logback-site mvn compile site:site That's it. Depending on the length of your documentation, you could start a new page or alternatively add to the extensions page. As you see fit. Ok. I thought I only had commit rights in slf4j-ext, so I didn't just start playing around with the current files (plus I got it confused with the logback files, which didn't exactly help, but I digress...). I've added an initial draft which hopefully should contain all the stuff that is relevant. For now I've kept it in the single page, but it will most likely need to be split later. What is your current estimate for the 1.5.6 release? /Thorbjørn ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
Ceki Gulcu skrev: Are there any remaining tasks? Thorbjørn is still working on agent instrumentation. Ralph has volunteered to add documentation about XLogger. The I believe this is now as good as it is going to get at this point. I still need to write the usage documentation where the actual wording depends on the context. Could you please either provide a template page in slf4j-site or tell me how I should do this properly? As it is together with the XLogger and the profiler it would make sense if it was a coherent whole. Any thoughts? /Thorbjørn ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
Yes, it's definitely an error. It was fixed in revision 1188. Thank you Raplh. Ralph Goers wrote: In writing the doc I noticed that THROWING_MARKER and CATCHING_MARKER both have names of EXCEPTION and also are EXCEPTION_MARKERs, which also has a name of EXCEPTION. Is this an error? -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
Hello Ralph, Any progress on this item? Ralph Goers wrote: Yes, that is fine with me. Ceki Gulcu wrote: Hello Ralph, There is no hard deadline on the release, although I would like to get it done sometime this week, or early next week. Does that sound feasible to you? Ralph Goers wrote: It depends on how long you want to wait. I'm pretty sure I can get that documented by the end of the weekend. -- Ceki Gülcü Logback: The reliable, generic, fast and flexible logging framework for Java. http://logback.qos.ch ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
In writing the doc I noticed that THROWING_MARKER and CATCHING_MARKER both have names of EXCEPTION and also are EXCEPTION_MARKERs, which also has a name of EXCEPTION. Is this an error? Ceki Gulcu wrote: Hello Ralph, Any progress on this item? Ralph Goers wrote: Yes, that is fine with me. Ceki Gulcu wrote: Hello Ralph, There is no hard deadline on the release, although I would like to get it done sometime this week, or early next week. Does that sound feasible to you? Ralph Goers wrote: It depends on how long you want to wait. I'm pretty sure I can get that documented by the end of the weekend. ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
Ceki Gulcu skrev den 03-10-2008 21:53: Are there any remaining tasks? Thorbjørn is still working on agent instrumentation. Ralph has volunteered to add documentation about XLogger. The I think the agent instrumentation should not be announced until it is ready. In that regard I am quite interested in seeing what Real-World Code Ralph can throw at it :) Also, it is a problem that unless explicitly told not to, also JRE classes are instrumented. I have considered adding an origin check so that you can disable/enable instrumentation based on which jar it comes from. Was the stuff you added lately to identify the jar from the patch, hard to work with? ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
Hello Ralph, There is no hard deadline on the release, although I would like to get it done sometime this week, or early next week. Does that sound feasible to you? Ralph Goers wrote: It depends on how long you want to wait. I'm pretty sure I can get that documented by the end of the weekend. -- Ceki Gülcü ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Re: [slf4j-dev] 1.5.4?
Yes, that is fine with me. Ceki Gulcu wrote: Hello Ralph, There is no hard deadline on the release, although I would like to get it done sometime this week, or early next week. Does that sound feasible to you? Ralph Goers wrote: It depends on how long you want to wait. I'm pretty sure I can get that documented by the end of the weekend. ___ dev mailing list dev@slf4j.org http://www.slf4j.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
