[jira] [Created] (SLING-2946) IOOBE in TopicRoundRobinJobQueue

2013-07-08 Thread Timothee Maret (JIRA)
Timothee Maret created SLING-2946:
-

 Summary: IOOBE in TopicRoundRobinJobQueue
 Key: SLING-2946
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2946
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Engine
Affects Versions: Extensions Event 3.1.4
Reporter: Timothee Maret


The TopicRoundRobinJobQueue throws IndexOutOfBoundsException which fill the 
logs.
The reason is that the 'topicIndex' is never decreased (or set to 0) when the 
'topics' array list can be decreased in two methods:

* clear
* removeAllJobs


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (SLING-2945) ClusterLoadTest failures

2013-07-08 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13701883#comment-13701883
 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-2945:


[~egli] - I've taken a look at the tests and tried to implement them using the 
RetryLoop, for maximum flexibility. I'm not sure if the semantics are preserved 
( the RetryLoop waits for each instance on each iteration, instead of waiting 
for all instances once at the start of the iteration ).

The tests consistently pass for me, tested with a heavy CPU/IO process running 
on the same time, whereas they were failing before.

I also needed to add a try/catch to the dumpRepo calls, they failed probably 
due to concurrent session access ( will paste stack trace below ). Anyway, I'd 
appreciate if you could take a look at the patch and let me know if I can apply 
it as-is or if it needs rework.

javax.jcr.InvalidItemStateException: Item does not exist anymore: 
4b3d508e-5e4c-4385-a6d4-68f07d8dce89
at 
org.apache.jackrabbit.core.ItemImpl.itemSanityCheck(ItemImpl.java:116)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.ItemImpl.perform(ItemImpl.java:90)
at org.apache.jackrabbit.core.NodeImpl.getNodes(NodeImpl.java:2141)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:393)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:396)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:396)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:396)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:396)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:396)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:396)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:396)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:396)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dump(Instance.java:396)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.setup.Instance.dumpRepo(Instance.java:355)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.cluster.ClusterLoadTest.doTest(ClusterLoadTest.java:145)
at 
org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.cluster.ClusterLoadTest.testSevenInstances(ClusterLoadTest.java:102)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at 
sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at 
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592)
at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:45)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:15)
at 
org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:42)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:20)
at 
org.junit.internal.runners.statements.RunAfters.evaluate(RunAfters.java:30)
at org.junit.rules.Verifier$1.evaluate(Verifier.java:33)
at org.junit.rules.RunRules.evaluate(RunRules.java:18)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:263)
at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:68)
at 
org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:47)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.run(ParentRunner.java:231)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:60)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:229)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$000(ParentRunner.java:50)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:222)
at org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:300)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
at 
org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:197)



 ClusterLoadTest failures
 

 Key: SLING-2945
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2945
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Extensions
Reporter: Robert Munteanu
Assignee: Stefan Egli
 

Re: SLING-2803 validation module, hierarchical structures and extensible types

2013-07-08 Thread Alexander Klimetschek
On 04.07.2013, at 07:54, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:

 As I wrote, a hierarchy is only supported by a single implementation for
 reading - not for writing, so it doesn't make sense to me to support this
 in validation as this can't be written through the resource api in the same
 way. The post servlet is splitting paths and creates a resource for each
 part of the path except the last part which is the property on the last
 resource.

Validation is only about reading, so there is no problem if the 
ModifiableValueMap doesn't support relative paths, it would never be used by 
validation code.

IMO the relative paths in the JcrPropertyMap are a great feature (at least for 
reading). Relative paths are a good invention and shorten the code a lot.

Cheers,
Alex

Re: SLING-2803 validation module, hierarchical structures and extensible types

2013-07-08 Thread Alexander Klimetschek
On 04.07.2013, at 14:56, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:

 Adding this - maybe as an optional service - into the resource resolver
 makes it also impossible to bypass validation - the validation is always
 done regardless whether the changes are done through the post servlet, any
 other servlet, or some server side code running in the background.

We should be careful with the imposed new processing overhead of this. There 
needs to be control over it, and IMO an active whitelisting for which 
validators (i.e. resource types) this would happen and when. And the simplest 
way to do that is to have custom application code call the validation service 
(one-liner) themselves and do it automatically only in the post servlet (but 
also with an option to enable/disable individual validators).

Cheers,
Alex

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-2945) ClusterLoadTest failures

2013-07-08 Thread Stefan Egli (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13701899#comment-13701899
 ] 

Stefan Egli commented on SLING-2945:


[~rombert], excellent. That patch looks good. I might add some more asserts to 
the Condition there to check not only the count but if the correct instances 
are visible. But I can apply that after patch.

Re the exception: jup, I should probably have done some more safety-checks 
there - but the catch is fine for now.

 ClusterLoadTest failures
 

 Key: SLING-2945
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2945
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Extensions
Reporter: Robert Munteanu
Assignee: Stefan Egli
 Attachments: SLING-2945-retry-loop.patch


 This test has failed recently on Jenkins at [1], with the message: 
 ---
  T E S T S
 ---
 Running org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.cluster.ClusterLoadTest
 Build timed out (after 150 minutes). Marking the build as failed.
 Results :
 Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
 To debug infra issues, I've also set up a Travis CI build at [2] . This test 
 also fails there, but the error message is clearer: Caused by: 
 javax.jcr.PathNotFoundException: /var/discovery/impl . The full build log is 
 at [3].
 I also have errors when repeatedly running the test locally, so it's not just 
 CI flakiness.
 [1] : 
 https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Sling/job/sling-trunk-1.6/1715/console
 [2]: http://travis-ci.org/rombert/sling/
 [3]: https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/8746894/log.txt

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Jenkins build is still unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing WAR version #89

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/89/



Re: SLING-2803 validation module, hierarchical structures and extensible types

2013-07-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Even if there is processing overhead - and I think this is really minimal
compared to persisting the data - storing unvalidated and therefore maybe
wrong data might haver a much higher impact on the application.

And I totally agree, this needs to be configurable (controllable) - but
limiting this to the post servlet is way too restrictive.

Carsten


2013/7/8 Alexander Klimetschek aklim...@adobe.com

 On 04.07.2013, at 14:56, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:

  Adding this - maybe as an optional service - into the resource resolver
  makes it also impossible to bypass validation - the validation is always
  done regardless whether the changes are done through the post servlet,
 any
  other servlet, or some server side code running in the background.

 We should be careful with the imposed new processing overhead of this.
 There needs to be control over it, and IMO an active whitelisting for which
 validators (i.e. resource types) this would happen and when. And the
 simplest way to do that is to have custom application code call the
 validation service (one-liner) themselves and do it automatically only in
 the post servlet (but also with an option to enable/disable individual
 validators).

 Cheers,
 Alex




-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org


Jenkins build is still unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 #89

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/changes



[jira] [Assigned] (SLING-2946) IOOBE in TopicRoundRobinJobQueue

2013-07-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-2946:
---

Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler

 IOOBE in TopicRoundRobinJobQueue
 

 Key: SLING-2946
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2946
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Engine
Affects Versions: Extensions Event 3.1.4
Reporter: Timothee Maret
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
 Attachments: SLING-2946.patch


 The TopicRoundRobinJobQueue throws IndexOutOfBoundsException which fill the 
 logs.
 The reason is that the 'topicIndex' is never decreased (or set to 0) when the 
 'topics' array list can be decreased in two methods:
 * clear
 * removeAllJobs

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-2946) IOOBE in TopicRoundRobinJobQueue

2013-07-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Carsten Ziegeler resolved SLING-2946.
-

   Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Extensions Event 3.2.0

Thanks for your patch, it's applied

 IOOBE in TopicRoundRobinJobQueue
 

 Key: SLING-2946
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2946
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Engine
Affects Versions: Extensions Event 3.1.4
Reporter: Timothee Maret
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
 Fix For: Extensions Event 3.2.0

 Attachments: SLING-2946.patch


 The TopicRoundRobinJobQueue throws IndexOutOfBoundsException which fill the 
 logs.
 The reason is that the 'topicIndex' is never decreased (or set to 0) when the 
 'topics' array list can be decreased in two methods:
 * clear
 * removeAllJobs

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (SLING-2945) ClusterLoadTest failures

2013-07-08 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13701951#comment-13701951
 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-2945:


Thanks for the review, I've committed the changes in 
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=r1500670

 ClusterLoadTest failures
 

 Key: SLING-2945
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2945
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Extensions
Reporter: Robert Munteanu
Assignee: Stefan Egli
 Attachments: SLING-2945-retry-loop.patch


 This test has failed recently on Jenkins at [1], with the message: 
 ---
  T E S T S
 ---
 Running org.apache.sling.discovery.impl.cluster.ClusterLoadTest
 Build timed out (after 150 minutes). Marking the build as failed.
 Results :
 Tests run: 0, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
 To debug infra issues, I've also set up a Travis CI build at [2] . This test 
 also fails there, but the error message is clearer: Caused by: 
 javax.jcr.PathNotFoundException: /var/discovery/impl . The full build log is 
 at [3].
 I also have errors when repeatedly running the test locally, so it's not just 
 CI flakiness.
 [1] : 
 https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Sling/job/sling-trunk-1.6/1715/console
 [2]: http://travis-ci.org/rombert/sling/
 [3]: https://s3.amazonaws.com/archive.travis-ci.org/jobs/8746894/log.txt

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Created] (SLING-2947) Merge installer api back into core

2013-07-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)
Carsten Ziegeler created SLING-2947:
---

 Summary: Merge installer api back into core
 Key: SLING-2947
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2947
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Installer
Affects Versions: Installer Core 3.4.6
Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
 Fix For: Installer Core 3.4.8


I recently came across a problem when upgrading the installer (core) by itself:
- the old version is pre 3.4.0 and therefore a single bundle including api
- the new version is post 3.4.0 where api and core needs to be installed

The old installer detects that a new core bundle should be installed and runs 
its update task and updates from 3.3.8 to 3.4.2 - unfortunately at this point, 
the api bundle is not installed yet and therefore the installer core does not 
resolve and that's the end of it.

We'll run into similar problems once we update the API and the core requires 
the new api.

So we have two options, add more special casing for handling this situation - 
or revert SLING-2527 and merge the api back into the core - making it a single 
unit. I would go the latter way as this is much simpler to handle and avoids 
adding another special casing which is now even trickier as it requires to 
check for two bundles - and if they are compatible etc.

I'll go the cleaner road and merge the api back

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Jenkins build is still unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing WAR version #90

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/90/



Jenkins build is still unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 #90

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/changes



Re: SLING-2803 validation module, hierarchical structures and extensible types

2013-07-08 Thread Dominik Süß
+1 - validation can also be necessary on dataimport through services, to
have a default integration of this service in the default Post Handler is
IMHO a mandatory but not stricktly bound extension to this service.

Dominik


On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.orgwrote:

 Even if there is processing overhead - and I think this is really minimal
 compared to persisting the data - storing unvalidated and therefore maybe
 wrong data might haver a much higher impact on the application.

 And I totally agree, this needs to be configurable (controllable) - but
 limiting this to the post servlet is way too restrictive.

 Carsten


 2013/7/8 Alexander Klimetschek aklim...@adobe.com

  On 04.07.2013, at 14:56, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org wrote:
 
   Adding this - maybe as an optional service - into the resource resolver
   makes it also impossible to bypass validation - the validation is
 always
   done regardless whether the changes are done through the post servlet,
  any
   other servlet, or some server side code running in the background.
 
  We should be careful with the imposed new processing overhead of this.
  There needs to be control over it, and IMO an active whitelisting for
 which
  validators (i.e. resource types) this would happen and when. And the
  simplest way to do that is to have custom application code call the
  validation service (one-liner) themselves and do it automatically only in
  the post servlet (but also with an option to enable/disable individual
  validators).
 
  Cheers,
  Alex




 --
 Carsten Ziegeler
 cziege...@apache.org



Build failed in Jenkins: sling-trunk-1.6 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing WAR version #1719

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/1719/

--
[...truncated 6 lines...]
[INFO] --- maven-clean-plugin:2.2:clean (default-clean) @ 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war ---
[INFO] Deleting file-set: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/
 (included: [derby.log, cachedir, sling, jackrabbit], excluded: [])
[INFO] 
[INFO] --- maven-enforcer-plugin:1.0.1:enforce (enforce-java) @ 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war ---
[INFO] [INFO] Executing tasks

main:
[INFO] Executed tasks

[INFO] --- maven-antrun-plugin:1.7:run 
(set-bundle-required-execution-environment) @ 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war ---
[INFO] [INFO] Using bundle list file from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/sling-trunk-1.6/trunk/launchpad/builder/target/bundleList.xml
[INFO] merging partial bundle list for 
org.apache.sling:org.apache.sling.launchpad.test-bundles:0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
[INFO] merging configuration from partial bundle list for 
org.apache.sling:org.apache.sling.launchpad.test-bundles:0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
Downloading: 
http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/org/apache/sling/org.apache.sling.launchpad.test-bundles/0.0.1-SNAPSHOT/org.apache.sling.launchpad.test-bundles-0.0.1-SNAPSHOT-bundlelistconfig.zip
[INFO] Copying base artifact from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/sling-trunk-1.6/trunk/launchpad/base/target/org.apache.sling.launchpad.base-2.5.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/org.apache.sling.launchpad.base.jar.

[INFO] --- maven-launchpad-plugin:2.1.2:prepare-package (prepare-package) @ 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war ---
[INFO] Copying bundle from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/0/commons-io/commons-io/1.4/commons-io-1.4.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/bundles/0/commons-io-1.4.jar
[INFO] Copying bundle from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/0/commons-fileupload/commons-fileupload/1.2.2/commons-fileupload-1.2.2.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/bundles/0/commons-fileupload-1.2.2.jar
[INFO] Copying bundle from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/0/commons-collections/commons-collections/3.2.1/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/bundles/0/commons-collections-3.2.1.jar
[INFO] Copying bundle from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/0/commons-codec/commons-codec/1.6/commons-codec-1.6.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/bundles/0/commons-codec-1.6.jar
[INFO] Copying bundle from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/0/commons-lang/commons-lang/2.5/commons-lang-2.5.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/bundles/0/commons-lang-2.5.jar
[INFO] Copying bundle from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/0/org/apache/commons/commons-math/2.2/commons-math-2.2.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/bundles/0/commons-math-2.2.jar
[INFO] Copying bundle from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/0/org/apache/geronimo/bundles/commons-httpclient/3.1_1/commons-httpclient-3.1_1.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/bundles/0/commons-httpclient-3.1_1.jar
[INFO] Copying bundle from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/sling-trunk-1.6/trunk/bundles/commons/osgi/target/org.apache.sling.commons.osgi-2.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/bundles/0/org.apache.sling.commons.osgi-2.2.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
[INFO] Copying bundle from 
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven-repositories/0/org/apache/sling/org.apache.sling.commons.mime/2.1.4/org.apache.sling.commons.mime-2.1.4.jar
 to 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/ws/target/launchpad-bundles/resources/bundles/0/org.apache.sling.commons.mime-2.1.4.jar
[INFO] Copying bundle from 

Jenkins build is back to stable : sling-trunk-1.6 » Apache Sling Resource-Based Discovery Service #1719

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.discovery.impl/1719/changes



Jenkins build became unstable: sling-trunk-1.6 » Apache Sling Sample Integration Tests #1719

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.testing.samples.integrationtests/1719/



Re: SLING-2803 validation module, hierarchical structures and extensible types

2013-07-08 Thread Radu Cotescu
Hi,

Apart from Carsten nobody else provided me with an answer to my question,
which in the end boils down to what kind of validation is needed in Sling:

Depending on what we need in Sling I see two solutions:
 1. extend the current API and implementation to be able to validate
 tree-like structures - better suited for validating requests rather than
 resources, given that most ValueMap implementations don't provide us with
 the children's properties
 2. erase and start over with a new validation framework at the
 ResourceResolver level that would handle validation right before the commit
 phase - this implies that we actually validate changed resources (credits
 to Carsten for this idea)

 Devs, which solution sounds better to you and why?


What would be the minimum requirements for adding some validation bundles
(api + impl) in contrib?

Thanks,
Radu


On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Dominik Süß dominik.su...@gmail.com wrote:

 +1 - validation can also be necessary on dataimport through services, to
 have a default integration of this service in the default Post Handler is
 IMHO a mandatory but not stricktly bound extension to this service.

 Dominik


 On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
 wrote:

  Even if there is processing overhead - and I think this is really minimal
  compared to persisting the data - storing unvalidated and therefore maybe
  wrong data might haver a much higher impact on the application.
 
  And I totally agree, this needs to be configurable (controllable) - but
  limiting this to the post servlet is way too restrictive.
 
  Carsten
 
 
  2013/7/8 Alexander Klimetschek aklim...@adobe.com
 
   On 04.07.2013, at 14:56, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
 wrote:
  
Adding this - maybe as an optional service - into the resource
 resolver
makes it also impossible to bypass validation - the validation is
  always
done regardless whether the changes are done through the post
 servlet,
   any
other servlet, or some server side code running in the background.
  
   We should be careful with the imposed new processing overhead of this.
   There needs to be control over it, and IMO an active whitelisting for
  which
   validators (i.e. resource types) this would happen and when. And the
   simplest way to do that is to have custom application code call the
   validation service (one-liner) themselves and do it automatically only
 in
   the post servlet (but also with an option to enable/disable individual
   validators).
  
   Cheers,
   Alex
 
 
 
 
  --
  Carsten Ziegeler
  cziege...@apache.org
 



Re: SLING-2803 validation module, hierarchical structures and extensible types

2013-07-08 Thread Dominik Süß
Hi Radu,

regarding the first part of your mail:
 I see validation as generic check which allows to read (and explicitly not
modify, I wouldn't mess with autofixing) data from anywhere in the system
(inkluding resourcetree as well as OSGi Services) and return either true or
false and optionally some metadata like what caused it to fail (and
probably some resoltionhints).

Best regards
Dominik


On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Radu Cotescu r...@apache.org wrote:

 Hi,

 Apart from Carsten nobody else provided me with an answer to my question,
 which in the end boils down to what kind of validation is needed in Sling:

 Depending on what we need in Sling I see two solutions:
  1. extend the current API and implementation to be able to validate
  tree-like structures - better suited for validating requests rather than
  resources, given that most ValueMap implementations don't provide us with
  the children's properties
  2. erase and start over with a new validation framework at the
  ResourceResolver level that would handle validation right before the
 commit
  phase - this implies that we actually validate changed resources (credits
  to Carsten for this idea)
 
  Devs, which solution sounds better to you and why?
 

 What would be the minimum requirements for adding some validation bundles
 (api + impl) in contrib?

 Thanks,
 Radu


 On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Dominik Süß dominik.su...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  +1 - validation can also be necessary on dataimport through services, to
  have a default integration of this service in the default Post Handler is
  IMHO a mandatory but not stricktly bound extension to this service.
 
  Dominik
 
 
  On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
  wrote:
 
   Even if there is processing overhead - and I think this is really
 minimal
   compared to persisting the data - storing unvalidated and therefore
 maybe
   wrong data might haver a much higher impact on the application.
  
   And I totally agree, this needs to be configurable (controllable) - but
   limiting this to the post servlet is way too restrictive.
  
   Carsten
  
  
   2013/7/8 Alexander Klimetschek aklim...@adobe.com
  
On 04.07.2013, at 14:56, Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
  wrote:
   
 Adding this - maybe as an optional service - into the resource
  resolver
 makes it also impossible to bypass validation - the validation is
   always
 done regardless whether the changes are done through the post
  servlet,
any
 other servlet, or some server side code running in the background.
   
We should be careful with the imposed new processing overhead of
 this.
There needs to be control over it, and IMO an active whitelisting for
   which
validators (i.e. resource types) this would happen and when. And the
simplest way to do that is to have custom application code call the
validation service (one-liner) themselves and do it automatically
 only
  in
the post servlet (but also with an option to enable/disable
 individual
validators).
   
Cheers,
Alex
  
  
  
  
   --
   Carsten Ziegeler
   cziege...@apache.org
  
 



[jira] [Commented] (SLING-2940) JCR queries for jcr:language: avoid using fn:lower-case

2013-07-08 Thread Thomas Mueller (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13702007#comment-13702007
 ] 

Thomas Mueller commented on SLING-2940:
---

Any news about when the patch might be applied, or problems with the patch?

 JCR queries for jcr:language: avoid using fn:lower-case
 ---

 Key: SLING-2940
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2940
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Extensions
Reporter: Thomas Mueller
 Attachments: SLING-2940.patch


 In SLING-2121, the query was changed to support both lowercase and uppercase 
 country codes in locales, for example en_GB and en_gb. To do that, 
 fn:lower-case(jcr:language) = 'en_gb' is currently used. While it works, the 
 usage of fn:lower-case is problematic for the query engine in Jackrabbit and 
 specially Oak, because it is quite hard to use an index in this case.
 To improve performance of this query with Oak, I suggest to use the longer 
 form with or: jcr:language = 'en_gb' or jcr:language = 'en_GB'. In this 
 case, Jackrabbit / Oak can use an index. See also OAK-882 for index usage for 
 or conditions.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Re: SLING-2803 validation module, hierarchical structures and extensible types

2013-07-08 Thread Alexander Klimetschek
On 08.07.2013, at 14:42, Radu Cotescu r...@apache.org wrote:

 Depending on what we need in Sling I see two solutions:
 1. extend the current API and implementation to be able to validate
 tree-like structures - better suited for validating requests rather than
 resources, given that most ValueMap implementations don't provide us with
 the children's properties
 2. erase and start over with a new validation framework at the
 ResourceResolver level that would handle validation right before the commit
 phase - this implies that we actually validate changed resources (credits
 to Carsten for this idea)

I think Validation should be its own service that you can call for resource 
/foo explicitly, an entire subtree or based on transient changes in JCR. This 
separates concerns properly.

Then the question is in which places it gets called. Sling POST servlet is the 
main use case.

But -1 on building it into ResourceResolver.save() for now - this is a huge 
change we should not do before we don't have experience and feel comfortable. I 
am not sure if we should ever do it... because it bakes in validation into the 
infrastructure layer, which is just another schema and as we know with JCR, 
less schema is better for evolution. For example, nobody is using extended node 
types with value constraints in JCR, and in Sling we always point out the great 
flexibility of the sling:resourceType property. There are good reasons for it.

So IMO applications should be in control over validation, by explicitly calling 
that validation service before they do a session.save().

And regarding the mentioned imports: especially for imports, you usually want 
to switch off validation to make things faster or avoid little issues (that you 
can fix/migrate later) break the entire import.

If we learn more how those validations are used and once the framework is 
stable and performance-proven, we can start again to think about hooking that 
automatically in for everthing.

Just my 2 cents,
Alex



Jenkins build became unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Event Support #91

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.event/91/



Re: SLING-2803 validation module, hierarchical structures and extensible types

2013-07-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Of course, validation is a separate service - my idea was that the resolver
could call this (optionally) on commit() - please note we're talking about
the Sling API here, so we deal with a resource resolver and resources - not
with sessions and nodes.

I'm fine with having the validation as a separate step, which needs to be
called explicitly. But I repeat, validation should keep the resource API in
mind and in general a ValueMap gives you just the properties of a resource
and paths are not working. And also, validation has to be usable without a
request.
And then again, I guess the transient space of the resource resolver is the
best place.

In order to do proper validation on the transient space, you need to know,
what has been created/updated/deleted. So the validator API needs a way to
give this as an input.


Carsten


2013/7/8 Alexander Klimetschek aklim...@adobe.com

 On 08.07.2013, at 14:42, Radu Cotescu r...@apache.org wrote:

  Depending on what we need in Sling I see two solutions:
  1. extend the current API and implementation to be able to validate
  tree-like structures - better suited for validating requests rather than
  resources, given that most ValueMap implementations don't provide us
 with
  the children's properties
  2. erase and start over with a new validation framework at the
  ResourceResolver level that would handle validation right before the
 commit
  phase - this implies that we actually validate changed resources
 (credits
  to Carsten for this idea)

 I think Validation should be its own service that you can call for
 resource /foo explicitly, an entire subtree or based on transient changes
 in JCR. This separates concerns properly.

 Then the question is in which places it gets called. Sling POST servlet is
 the main use case.

 But -1 on building it into ResourceResolver.save() for now - this is a
 huge change we should not do before we don't have experience and feel
 comfortable. I am not sure if we should ever do it... because it bakes in
 validation into the infrastructure layer, which is just another schema and
 as we know with JCR, less schema is better for evolution. For example,
 nobody is using extended node types with value constraints in JCR, and in
 Sling we always point out the great flexibility of the sling:resourceType
 property. There are good reasons for it.

 So IMO applications should be in control over validation, by explicitly
 calling that validation service before they do a session.save().

 And regarding the mentioned imports: especially for imports, you usually
 want to switch off validation to make things faster or avoid little issues
 (that you can fix/migrate later) break the entire import.

 If we learn more how those validations are used and once the framework is
 stable and performance-proven, we can start again to think about hooking
 that automatically in for everthing.

 Just my 2 cents,
 Alex




-- 
Carsten Ziegeler
cziege...@apache.org


[jira] [Assigned] (SLING-2940) JCR queries for jcr:language: avoid using fn:lower-case

2013-07-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Carsten Ziegeler reassigned SLING-2940:
---

Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler

 JCR queries for jcr:language: avoid using fn:lower-case
 ---

 Key: SLING-2940
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2940
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Extensions
Reporter: Thomas Mueller
Assignee: Carsten Ziegeler
 Attachments: SLING-2940.patch


 In SLING-2121, the query was changed to support both lowercase and uppercase 
 country codes in locales, for example en_GB and en_gb. To do that, 
 fn:lower-case(jcr:language) = 'en_gb' is currently used. While it works, the 
 usage of fn:lower-case is problematic for the query engine in Jackrabbit and 
 specially Oak, because it is quite hard to use an index in this case.
 To improve performance of this query with Oak, I suggest to use the longer 
 form with or: jcr:language = 'en_gb' or jcr:language = 'en_GB'. In this 
 case, Jackrabbit / Oak can use an index. See also OAK-882 for index usage for 
 or conditions.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Created] (SLING-2948) Servlet archetype - set encoding for generated project

2013-07-08 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)
Robert Munteanu created SLING-2948:
--

 Summary: Servlet archetype - set encoding for generated project
 Key: SLING-2948
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2948
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Maven Plugins and Archetypes
Affects Versions: Servlet Archetype 1.0.0
Reporter: Robert Munteanu
Assignee: Robert Munteanu
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: Servlet Archetype 1.0.2


Currently the generated servlet archetype does not set the encoding for the 
generated project. This does not follow Maven best practices, and generates 
warning when building.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (SLING-1778) Symlinks

2013-07-08 Thread Carsten Ziegeler (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13702063#comment-13702063
 ] 

Carsten Ziegeler commented on SLING-1778:
-

Just curious, why do you think we should add both patches to the extensions?

 Symlinks
 

 Key: SLING-1778
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-1778
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: JCR
Reporter: Julian Sedding
 Attachments: 130704_symlinks-0.0.4.patch, symlinks.patch


 I have implemented a ResourceProvider, which allows to create symlink nodes 
 in the JCR repository. A symlink node has a sling:symlinkTarget property, 
 which should contain a valid JCR path. JCR content from the 
 sling:symlinkTarget path is then exposed below the symlink node.
 There is a mixin node type, sling:Symlink with a mandatory property 
 sling:symlinkTarget and an optional property sling:overlayable. Additionally, 
 there is a convenience node type, sling:SymlinkResource, which extends from 
 sling:symlinkTarget and nt:unstructured.
 ResourceProvider instances are registered for existing symlinks when the 
 bundle is started. Modifications are taken care of via JCR observation.
 To get started:
 * apply the attached patch to a trunk checkout
 * build and install the bundle 
 * create a symlink node, pointing to some existing content
 * access the symlink node e.g. via a browser

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Commented] (SLING-2903) launchpad/testing TestSuite fails with JUnit 4 tests

2013-07-08 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13702072#comment-13702072
 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-2903:


This seems to still happen in Jenkins, see 
https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/Sling/job/sling-trunk-1.6/1720/console .

 launchpad/testing TestSuite fails with JUnit 4 tests
 

 Key: SLING-2903
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2903
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Testing
Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
Assignee: Bertrand Delacretaz
 Fix For: Launchpad Testing 7


 I changed the ServerSideScriptsTest to JUnit 4 style yesterday and failed to 
 notice that this breaks the launchpad/testing test suite:
 junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 
 org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.ServerSideScriptsTest.ScriptableTest
  does not extend TestCase
   at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50)
 ...
   at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)
   at 
 org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing.LoggingSuite.runTest(LoggingSuite.java:77)
   at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)
   at 
 org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing.LoggingSuite.run(LoggingSuite.java:65)
 ...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Re: svn commit: r1500794 - in /sling/trunk/maven/archetypes/servlet/src: main/resources/archetype-resources/pom.xml test/resources/projects/normal/reference/pom.xml

2013-07-08 Thread Robert Munteanu
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Robert Munteanu rob...@lmn.ro wrote:

 However, it seems like the revision is no longer in SVN -
 http://svn.apache.org/r1500794 bombs out.

 Any idea why?

Nevermind, it was probably a SVN mirroring delay.

Now fixed.


[jira] [Commented] (SLING-2948) Servlet archetype - set encoding for generated project

2013-07-08 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13702075#comment-13702075
 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-2948:


Fixed in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=r1500794

 Servlet archetype - set encoding for generated project
 --

 Key: SLING-2948
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2948
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Maven Plugins and Archetypes
Affects Versions: Servlet Archetype 1.0.0
Reporter: Robert Munteanu
Assignee: Robert Munteanu
Priority: Trivial
 Fix For: Servlet Archetype 1.0.2


 Currently the generated servlet archetype does not set the encoding for the 
 generated project. This does not follow Maven best practices, and generates 
 warning when building.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Jenkins build is unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Sample Integration Tests #92

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.testing.samples.integrationtests/92/



Jenkins build is back to stable : sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Event Support #92

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.event/92/



Jenkins build is unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing #92

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing/92/



Jenkins build is unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing WAR version #92

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/92/



[jira] [Created] (SLING-2949) Remove plugin version hardcoding from the reactor pom

2013-07-08 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)
Robert Munteanu created SLING-2949:
--

 Summary: Remove plugin version hardcoding from the reactor pom
 Key: SLING-2949
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2949
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: General
Reporter: Robert Munteanu
Assignee: Robert Munteanu
Priority: Minor


We declare version 2.2, but 2.4.1 is inherited from the Apache parent pom. At a 
minimum, we will benefit from the performance enhancements brought by 
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCLEAN-32 .

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Resolved] (SLING-2949) Remove plugin version hardcoding from the reactor pom

2013-07-08 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Robert Munteanu resolved SLING-2949.


Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revisionrevision=1500809

 Remove plugin version hardcoding from the reactor pom
 -

 Key: SLING-2949
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2949
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: General
Reporter: Robert Munteanu
Assignee: Robert Munteanu
Priority: Minor

 We declare version 2.2, but 2.4.1 is inherited from the Apache parent pom. At 
 a minimum, we will benefit from the performance enhancements brought by 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCLEAN-32 .

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


Jenkins build is unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 #92

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/92/changes



Jenkins build is still unstable: sling-trunk-1.6 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing WAR version #1721

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/1721/



Jenkins build is still unstable: sling-trunk-1.6 #1721

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/changes



Jenkins build is still unstable: sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Sample Integration Tests #93

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.testing.samples.integrationtests/93/



Jenkins build is back to stable : sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing #93

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing/93/



Build failed in Jenkins: sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing WAR version #93

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/93/

--
[...truncated 273 lines...]
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.JsonQueryServletTest
Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.JSONGroovyBuilderTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.post.SlingDefaultValuesTest
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.post.PostServletAtMoveTest
Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.userManager.UpdateGroupTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.accessManager.PrivilegesInfoTest
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.ValueFromTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.PostRedirectTest
Tests run: 7, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.post.ReferenceTypeHintTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.GetStarTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.resolution.HtmlDefaultServletTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.resolution.PrefixTest
Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.CreateNodeTest
Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.ScriptBuiltinObjectsTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.VanityPathTest
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.xml.SaxTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.ResourceSuperTypeTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.SyntheticResourceTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.resolution.PathsServletTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.xml.XPathTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.StreamServletTest
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.xml.DomTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.post.PostServletOrderTest
Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.JspIncludeTest
http://localhost:36657/JspIncludeTest/1373305888129/text_b_1373305888148_6
Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.NamespaceMappingTest
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.resolution.PathsServletWithNodeTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.post.PostServletMoveTest
Tests run: 15, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.issues.SLING2522Test
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.resolution.RequestUriOptingServletTest
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.login.RedirectOnLoginErrorTest
Tests run: 4, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.userManager.RemoveAuthorizablesTest
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.WebdavOptionsTest
Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.issues.SLING2085Test
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.post.PostServletDeleteTest
Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 
org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.servlets.post.PostServletNopTest
Tests run: 6, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
Running 

Build failed in Jenkins: sling-trunk-1.7 #93

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/93/changes

Changes:

[rombert] SLING-2949 - Remove plugin version hardcoding from the reactor pom

[rombert] SLING-2948 - Servlet archetype - set encoding for generated project

This prevents build warnings from being issued.

--
[...truncated 32512 lines...]
[INFO] Apache Sling Object Content Mapping ... SUCCESS [5.593s]
[INFO] Apache Sling JCR Resource Resolver  SUCCESS [1:24.937s]
[INFO] Apache Sling JCR Repository Registration .. SUCCESS [6.719s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Simple WebDAV Access to repositories . SUCCESS [4.753s]
[INFO] Apache Sling DavEx Access to repositories . SUCCESS [6.207s]
[INFO] Apache Sling JCR WebConsole Bundle  SUCCESS [3.489s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Servlet Resolver . SUCCESS [4.581s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Default GET Servlets . SUCCESS [4.546s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Default POST Servlets  SUCCESS [5.674s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Compat Servlets .. SUCCESS [3.264s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Scripting Implementation API . SUCCESS [4.816s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Scripting Core implementation  SUCCESS [5.306s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Scripting JavaScript Support . SUCCESS [20.504s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Scripting JSP Support  SUCCESS [5.827s]
[INFO] Apache Sling JSP Tag Library .. SUCCESS [4.077s]
[INFO] Apache Sling JSP Standard Tag Library . SUCCESS [3.515s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Adapter Manager Implementation ... SUCCESS [3.985s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Bundle Resource Provider . SUCCESS [4.429s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Discovery API  SUCCESS [4.115s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Resource-Based Discovery Service . SUCCESS [3:03.540s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Discovery Support Bundle . SUCCESS [3.183s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Discovery Standalone Implementation .. SUCCESS [4.236s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Event Support  SUCCESS [7:58.270s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Filesystem Resource Provider . SUCCESS [4.148s]
[INFO] Apache Sling javax.activation bundle .. SUCCESS [3.573s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Settings . SUCCESS [3.830s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Thread Dumper  SUCCESS [3.445s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Web Console Branding . SUCCESS [3.131s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Web Console Security Provider  SUCCESS [3.480s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Groovy Extensions  SUCCESS [3.828s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Explorer . SUCCESS [4.239s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Test Tools ... SUCCESS [4.565s]
[INFO] Apache Sling JUnit Core ... SUCCESS [3.897s]
[INFO] Apache Sling JUnit Scriptable Tests Provider .. SUCCESS [5.964s]
[INFO] Apache Sling JUnit Remote Tests Runners ... SUCCESS [4.473s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Testing Resource Resolver Mock ... SUCCESS [2.900s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Installer  SUCCESS [4.553s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Installer WebConsole Plugin .. SUCCESS [2.848s]
[INFO] Apache Sling File Installer ... SUCCESS [3.050s]
[INFO] Apache Sling JCR Installer  SUCCESS [2:18.322s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Installer Configuration Admin Support  SUCCESS [2.620s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Deployment Package Installer . SUCCESS [5.269s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Installer Integration Tests .. SUCCESS [44.474s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad API  SUCCESS [2.393s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Base ... SUCCESS [9.727s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Installer .. SUCCESS [3.389s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Content  SUCCESS [4.081s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Application Builder  SUCCESS [27.335s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Sample Server-Side Tests . SUCCESS [4.066s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Failing Server-Side Tests  SUCCESS [2.718s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Sample Integration Tests . SUCCESS [55.414s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Testing Services ... SUCCESS [6.018s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Testing Services WAR ... SUCCESS [3.193s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Testing Fragment Bundle  SUCCESS [2.694s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Test Bundles ... SUCCESS [3.727s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Integration Tests  SUCCESS [8.796s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Testing  SUCCESS [3:44.174s]
[INFO] Apache Sling Launchpad Testing WAR version  FAILURE [3:25.390s]
[INFO] Apache Sling (Builder)  SKIPPED
[INFO] 
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] 

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-2903) launchpad/testing TestSuite fails with JUnit 4 tests

2013-07-08 Thread Robert Munteanu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2903?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13702505#comment-13702505
 ] 

Robert Munteanu commented on SLING-2903:


The failure I mentioned above was rooted in the launchpad/testing-war 
directory. I've applied a similar fix to launchpad/testing-war in  
http://svn.apache.org/r1500984.

 launchpad/testing TestSuite fails with JUnit 4 tests
 

 Key: SLING-2903
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2903
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Testing
Reporter: Bertrand Delacretaz
Assignee: Bertrand Delacretaz
 Fix For: Launchpad Testing 7


 I changed the ServerSideScriptsTest to JUnit 4 style yesterday and failed to 
 notice that this breaks the launchpad/testing test suite:
 junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 
 org.apache.sling.launchpad.webapp.integrationtest.ServerSideScriptsTest.ScriptableTest
  does not extend TestCase
   at junit.framework.Assert.fail(Assert.java:50)
 ...
   at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:243)
   at 
 org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing.LoggingSuite.runTest(LoggingSuite.java:77)
   at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:238)
   at 
 org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing.LoggingSuite.run(LoggingSuite.java:65)
 ...

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Comment Edited] (SLING-2939) 3rd-party based implementation of discovery.api

2013-07-08 Thread kishore gopalakrishna (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13702523#comment-13702523
 ] 

kishore gopalakrishna edited comment on SLING-2939 at 7/8/13 10:18 PM:
---

Hi,

I am Kishore and work on Helix. Looks like Helix was ruled out because its 
focused on resource management. Would like to point that its not entirely true. 
I would like to provide more info but i got lost trying to gather the 
requirements from the JIRA. Its not clear if the requirement is only discovery 
and/or leader election. I also saw in between the mention of being rack aware 
etc. 

Would be glad to provide more info.



  was (Author: k4j):
Hi,

I am Kishore and work on Helix. Looks like Helix was ruled out because its 
focussed on resource management. Would like to point that its not entirely 
true. I would like to provide more info but i got lost trying to gather the 
requirements from the JIRA. Its not clear if the requirement is only discovery 
and/or leader election. I also saw in between the mention of being rack aware 
etc. 

Would be glad to provide more info.


  
 3rd-party based implementation of discovery.api
 ---

 Key: SLING-2939
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2939
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Extensions
Affects Versions: Discovery API 1.0.0
Reporter: Stefan Egli
Assignee: Stefan Egli

 The Sling Discovery API introduces the abstraction of a topology which 
 contains (Sling) clusters and instances, supports liveliness-detection, 
 leader-election within a cluster and property-propagation between the 
 instances. As a default and reference implementation a resource-based, OOTB 
 implementation was created (org.apache.sling.discovery.impl).
 Pros and cons of the discovery.impl
 Although the discovery.impl supports everything required in discovery.api, it 
 has a few limitations. Here's a list of pros and cons:
 Pros
 No additional software required (leverages repository for intra-cluster 
 communication/storage and HTTP-REST calls for cross-cluster communication)
 Very small footprint
 Perfectly suited for a single clusters, instance and for small, rather 
 stable hub-based topologies
 Cons
 Config-/deployment-limitations (aka embedded-limitation): connections 
 between clusters are peer-to-peer and explicit. To span a topology, a number 
 of instances must (be made) know (to) each other, changes in the topology 
 typically requires config adjustments to guarantee high availability of the 
 discovery service
 Except if a natural hub cluster exists that can serve as connection 
 point for all satellite clusters
 Other than that, it is less suited for large and/or dynamic topologies
 Change propagation (for topology parts reported via connectors) is 
 non-atomic and slow, hop-by-hop based
 No guarantee on order of TopologyEvents sent in individual instances - ie 
 different instances might see different orders of TopologyEvents (ie changes 
 in the topology) but eventually the topology is guaranteed to be consistent
 Robustness of discovery.impl wrt storm situations depends on robustness 
 of underlying cluster (not a real negative but discovery.impl might in theory 
 unveil repository bugs which would otherwise not have been a problem)
 Rather new, little tested code which might have issues with edge cases 
 wrt network problems
 although partitioning-support is not a requirement per se, similar 
 edge-cases might exist wrt network-delays/timing/crashes
 Reusing a suitable 3rd party library
 To provide an additional option as implementation of the discovery.api one 
 idea is to use a suitable 3rd party library.
 Requirements
 The following is a list of requirements a 3rd party library must support:
 liveliness detection: detect whether an instance is up and running
 stable leader election within a cluster: stable describes the fact that a 
 leader will remain leader until it leaves/crashes and no new, joining 
 instance shall take over while a leader exists
 stable instance ordering: the list of instances within a cluster is 
 ordered and stable, new, joining instances are put at the end of the list
 property propagation: propagate the properties provided within one 
 instance to everybody in the topology. there are no timing requirements bound 
 to this but the intention of this is not to be used as messaging but to 
 announce config parameters to the topology
 support large, dynamic clusters: configuration of the new discovery 
 implementation should be easy and support frequent changes in the (large) 
 topology
 no single point of failure: this is obvious, there should of course 

[jira] [Commented] (SLING-2939) 3rd-party based implementation of discovery.api

2013-07-08 Thread kishore gopalakrishna (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13702523#comment-13702523
 ] 

kishore gopalakrishna commented on SLING-2939:
--

Hi,

I am Kishore and work on Helix. Looks like Helix was ruled out because its 
focussed on resource management. Would like to point that its not entirely 
true. I would like to provide more info but i got lost trying to gather the 
requirements from the JIRA. Its not clear if the requirement is only discovery 
and/or leader election. I also saw in between the mention of being rack aware 
etc. 

Would be glad to provide more info.



 3rd-party based implementation of discovery.api
 ---

 Key: SLING-2939
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-2939
 Project: Sling
  Issue Type: Task
  Components: Extensions
Affects Versions: Discovery API 1.0.0
Reporter: Stefan Egli
Assignee: Stefan Egli

 The Sling Discovery API introduces the abstraction of a topology which 
 contains (Sling) clusters and instances, supports liveliness-detection, 
 leader-election within a cluster and property-propagation between the 
 instances. As a default and reference implementation a resource-based, OOTB 
 implementation was created (org.apache.sling.discovery.impl).
 Pros and cons of the discovery.impl
 Although the discovery.impl supports everything required in discovery.api, it 
 has a few limitations. Here's a list of pros and cons:
 Pros
 No additional software required (leverages repository for intra-cluster 
 communication/storage and HTTP-REST calls for cross-cluster communication)
 Very small footprint
 Perfectly suited for a single clusters, instance and for small, rather 
 stable hub-based topologies
 Cons
 Config-/deployment-limitations (aka embedded-limitation): connections 
 between clusters are peer-to-peer and explicit. To span a topology, a number 
 of instances must (be made) know (to) each other, changes in the topology 
 typically requires config adjustments to guarantee high availability of the 
 discovery service
 Except if a natural hub cluster exists that can serve as connection 
 point for all satellite clusters
 Other than that, it is less suited for large and/or dynamic topologies
 Change propagation (for topology parts reported via connectors) is 
 non-atomic and slow, hop-by-hop based
 No guarantee on order of TopologyEvents sent in individual instances - ie 
 different instances might see different orders of TopologyEvents (ie changes 
 in the topology) but eventually the topology is guaranteed to be consistent
 Robustness of discovery.impl wrt storm situations depends on robustness 
 of underlying cluster (not a real negative but discovery.impl might in theory 
 unveil repository bugs which would otherwise not have been a problem)
 Rather new, little tested code which might have issues with edge cases 
 wrt network problems
 although partitioning-support is not a requirement per se, similar 
 edge-cases might exist wrt network-delays/timing/crashes
 Reusing a suitable 3rd party library
 To provide an additional option as implementation of the discovery.api one 
 idea is to use a suitable 3rd party library.
 Requirements
 The following is a list of requirements a 3rd party library must support:
 liveliness detection: detect whether an instance is up and running
 stable leader election within a cluster: stable describes the fact that a 
 leader will remain leader until it leaves/crashes and no new, joining 
 instance shall take over while a leader exists
 stable instance ordering: the list of instances within a cluster is 
 ordered and stable, new, joining instances are put at the end of the list
 property propagation: propagate the properties provided within one 
 instance to everybody in the topology. there are no timing requirements bound 
 to this but the intention of this is not to be used as messaging but to 
 announce config parameters to the topology
 support large, dynamic clusters: configuration of the new discovery 
 implementation should be easy and support frequent changes in the (large) 
 topology
 no single point of failure: this is obvious, there should of course be no 
 single point of failure in the setup
 embedded or dedicated: this might be a hot topic: embedding a library has 
 the advantages of not having to install anything additional. a dedicated 
 service on the other hand requires additional handling in deployment. 
 embedding implies a peer-to-peer setup: nodes communicate peer-to-peer rather 
 than via a centralized service. this IMHO is a negative for large topologies 
 which would typically be cross data-centers. hence a dedicated service could 
 be seen as an advantage 

Jenkins build is back to stable : sling-trunk-1.6 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing WAR version #1722

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.6/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/1722/changes



Jenkins build is back to stable : sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Sample Integration Tests #94

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.testing.samples.integrationtests/94/



Jenkins build is back to normal : sling-trunk-1.7 » Apache Sling Launchpad Testing WAR version #94

2013-07-08 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See 
https://builds.apache.org/job/sling-trunk-1.7/org.apache.sling$org.apache.sling.launchpad.testing-war/94/changes