Re: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R

[Hossein]

The vote passed with following +1.

- Felix
- Joseph
- Xiangrui
- Reynold

Joseph has kindly volunteered to shepherd this.

Thanks,
--Hossein


On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 1:32 PM Reynold Xin  wrote:

> +1 on the proposal.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:17 PM Hossein  wrote:
>
>> Hi Shivaram,
>>
>> We converged on a CRAN release process that seems identical to current
>> SparkR.
>>
>> --Hossein
>>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman <
>> shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>>
>>> Hossein -- Can you clarify what the resolution on the repository /
>>> release issue discussed on SPIP ?
>>>
>>> Shivaram
>>>
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Felix Cheung 
>>> wrote:
>>> > +1
>>> > With my concerns in the SPIP discussion.
>>> >
>>> > 
>>> > From: Hossein 
>>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:03:03 PM
>>> > To: dev@spark.apache.org
>>> > Subject: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R
>>> >
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I started discussion thread for a new R package to expose MLlib
>>> pipelines in
>>> > R.
>>> >
>>> > To summarize we will work on utilities to generate R wrappers for MLlib
>>> > pipeline API for a new R package. This will lower the burden for
>>> exposing
>>> > new API in future.
>>> >
>>> > Following the SPIP process, I am proposing the SPIP for a vote.
>>> >
>>> > +1: Let's go ahead and implement the SPIP.
>>> > +0: Don't really care.
>>> > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > --Hossein
>>>
>>
>>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R

[Reynold Xin]

+1 on the proposal.


On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 8:17 PM Hossein  wrote:

> Hi Shivaram,
>
> We converged on a CRAN release process that seems identical to current
> SparkR.
>
> --Hossein
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman <
> shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hossein -- Can you clarify what the resolution on the repository /
>> release issue discussed on SPIP ?
>>
>> Shivaram
>>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Felix Cheung 
>> wrote:
>> > +1
>> > With my concerns in the SPIP discussion.
>> >
>> > 
>> > From: Hossein 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:03:03 PM
>> > To: dev@spark.apache.org
>> > Subject: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I started discussion thread for a new R package to expose MLlib
>> pipelines in
>> > R.
>> >
>> > To summarize we will work on utilities to generate R wrappers for MLlib
>> > pipeline API for a new R package. This will lower the burden for
>> exposing
>> > new API in future.
>> >
>> > Following the SPIP process, I am proposing the SPIP for a vote.
>> >
>> > +1: Let's go ahead and implement the SPIP.
>> > +0: Don't really care.
>> > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --Hossein
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R

[Hossein]

Hi Shivaram,

We converged on a CRAN release process that seems identical to current
SparkR.

--Hossein

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman <
shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:

> Hossein -- Can you clarify what the resolution on the repository /
> release issue discussed on SPIP ?
>
> Shivaram
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
> > +1
> > With my concerns in the SPIP discussion.
> >
> > 
> > From: Hossein 
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:03:03 PM
> > To: dev@spark.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I started discussion thread for a new R package to expose MLlib
> pipelines in
> > R.
> >
> > To summarize we will work on utilities to generate R wrappers for MLlib
> > pipeline API for a new R package. This will lower the burden for exposing
> > new API in future.
> >
> > Following the SPIP process, I am proposing the SPIP for a vote.
> >
> > +1: Let's go ahead and implement the SPIP.
> > +0: Don't really care.
> > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Hossein
>

Re: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R

[Xiangrui Meng]

+1.

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:28 PM Joseph Bradley 
wrote:

> Hossein might be slow to respond (OOO), but I just commented on the JIRA.
> I'd recommend we follow the same process as the SparkR package.
>
> +1 on this from me (and I'll be happy to help shepherd it, though Felix
> and Shivaram are the experts in this area).  CRAN presents challenges, but
> this is a good step towards making R a first-class citizen for ML use cases
> of Spark.
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman <
> shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hossein -- Can you clarify what the resolution on the repository /
>> release issue discussed on SPIP ?
>>
>> Shivaram
>>
>> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Felix Cheung 
>> wrote:
>> > +1
>> > With my concerns in the SPIP discussion.
>> >
>> > 
>> > From: Hossein 
>> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:03:03 PM
>> > To: dev@spark.apache.org
>> > Subject: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I started discussion thread for a new R package to expose MLlib
>> pipelines in
>> > R.
>> >
>> > To summarize we will work on utilities to generate R wrappers for MLlib
>> > pipeline API for a new R package. This will lower the burden for
>> exposing
>> > new API in future.
>> >
>> > Following the SPIP process, I am proposing the SPIP for a vote.
>> >
>> > +1: Let's go ahead and implement the SPIP.
>> > +0: Don't really care.
>> > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > --Hossein
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Joseph Bradley
>
> Software Engineer - Machine Learning
>
> Databricks, Inc.
>
> [image: http://databricks.com] 
>
-- 

Xiangrui Meng

Software Engineer

Databricks Inc. [image: http://databricks.com] 

Re: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R

[Joseph Bradley]

Hossein might be slow to respond (OOO), but I just commented on the JIRA.
I'd recommend we follow the same process as the SparkR package.

+1 on this from me (and I'll be happy to help shepherd it, though Felix and
Shivaram are the experts in this area).  CRAN presents challenges, but this
is a good step towards making R a first-class citizen for ML use cases of
Spark.

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:10 AM, Shivaram Venkataraman <
shiva...@eecs.berkeley.edu> wrote:

> Hossein -- Can you clarify what the resolution on the repository /
> release issue discussed on SPIP ?
>
> Shivaram
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Felix Cheung 
> wrote:
> > +1
> > With my concerns in the SPIP discussion.
> >
> > 
> > From: Hossein 
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:03:03 PM
> > To: dev@spark.apache.org
> > Subject: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I started discussion thread for a new R package to expose MLlib
> pipelines in
> > R.
> >
> > To summarize we will work on utilities to generate R wrappers for MLlib
> > pipeline API for a new R package. This will lower the burden for exposing
> > new API in future.
> >
> > Following the SPIP process, I am proposing the SPIP for a vote.
> >
> > +1: Let's go ahead and implement the SPIP.
> > +0: Don't really care.
> > -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > --Hossein
>
> -
> To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
>
>


-- 

Joseph Bradley

Software Engineer - Machine Learning

Databricks, Inc.

[image: http://databricks.com] 

Re: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R

[Shivaram Venkataraman]

Hossein -- Can you clarify what the resolution on the repository /
release issue discussed on SPIP ?

Shivaram

On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:06 AM, Felix Cheung  wrote:
> +1
> With my concerns in the SPIP discussion.
>
> 
> From: Hossein 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:03:03 PM
> To: dev@spark.apache.org
> Subject: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R
>
> Hi,
>
> I started discussion thread for a new R package to expose MLlib pipelines in
> R.
>
> To summarize we will work on utilities to generate R wrappers for MLlib
> pipeline API for a new R package. This will lower the burden for exposing
> new API in future.
>
> Following the SPIP process, I am proposing the SPIP for a vote.
>
> +1: Let's go ahead and implement the SPIP.
> +0: Don't really care.
> -1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons.
>
> Thanks,
> --Hossein

-
To unsubscribe e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R

[Felix Cheung]

+1
With my concerns in the SPIP discussion.


From: Hossein 
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2018 2:03:03 PM
To: dev@spark.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] SPIP ML Pipelines in R

Hi,

I started discussion 
thread
 for a new R package to expose MLlib pipelines in 
R.

To summarize we will work on utilities to generate R wrappers for MLlib 
pipeline API for a new R package. This will lower the burden for exposing new 
API in future.

Following the SPIP 
process, I am proposing 
the SPIP for a vote.

+1: Let's go ahead and implement the SPIP.
+0: Don't really care.
-1: I do not think this is a good idea for the following reasons.

Thanks,
--Hossein