Re: Status
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet > lately and just pinging to see who's still watching > and reading :) This project is obviously dead. There is no active development being done for C++2011, and no bug fixing for the existing C++2003 implementation. Fixing bugs in the current C++2003 implementation has proven impossible. And that's all I am going to say on that particular matter. Starting work now on the C++2011 implementation is much too late: there are already two open source production-quality implementations available: GNU and libc++/Clang. libc++ is already a full and complete implementation of C++2011. GNU will be complete in 2014. Both the GNU and the Clang implementations have been in the works for at least 4 years. Yes, there's this mailing list with close to zero relevant activity. Very easy to monitor and read: there's nothing to monitor, or read. Sorry to be blunt and somewhat negative, but these are the fact as I see them. -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.tele...@gmail.com
Re: Status
Still watching. On 15 Apr 2013, at 4:36 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > If possible ;) > > On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > >> On 04/15/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet >>> lately and just pinging to see who's still watching >>> and reading :) >>> >> >> Should we all respond :) >> >> Cheers >> -- >> ^TM >> >
Re: Status
If possible ;) On Apr 15, 2013, at 9:42 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > On 04/15/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet >> lately and just pinging to see who's still watching >> and reading :) >> > > Should we all respond :) > > Cheers > -- > ^TM >
Re: Status
On 04/15/13 09:35, Jim Jagielski wrote: Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet lately and just pinging to see who's still watching and reading :) Still here.
Re: Status
Pong On 4/15/13 10:35 AM, "Jim Jagielski" wrote: >Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet >lately and just pinging to see who's still watching >and reading :)
Re: Status
On 04/15/2013 03:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet lately and just pinging to see who's still watching and reading :) Should we all respond :) Cheers -- ^TM
Status
Just a quick Email... the list has been pretty quiet lately and just pinging to see who's still watching and reading :)
Re: spam posted to stdcxx Wiki
On 4/1/13 10:09 AM, Nick Burch wrote: On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, Martin Sebor wrote: Over the last few days there has been a jump in the number of spam pages added to the stdcxx wiki (see the attached email for an example of a recent one). Is there any way to prevent this? (Deleting each page as it gets created day after day is becoming tedious.) I believe the standard answer is: http://wiki.apache.org/general/OurWikiFarm#per_wiki_access_control_-_tighten_your_wiki_just_a_little.2C_benefit_just_a_lot There have a been a couple of projects in March that have tightened up their wiki permissions like that, so a quick browse through the infra archives should tell you more about how it works, what to do etc Nick Could you point me to a relevant post in the archive? I've searched infrastructure-dev and infrastrcture-issues but can't find anything relevant there, and I'm having trouble finding the archive for this list. (In the meantime, the spam on the stdcxx Wiki has increased to the point that I can't keep up with it.) Thanks Martin
