[GitHub] storm pull request: add dotNet adapter.
GitHub user ziyunhx opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/612 add dotNet adapter. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/ziyunhx/storm master Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/612.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #612 commit 8538ad35e1cb20f4e14eef968bab05a969a74fe9 Author: Carey Tzou ziyu...@gmail.com Date: 2015-07-02T08:12:05Z add dotNet adapter. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[jira] [Created] (STORM-924) Set the file mode of the files included when packaging release packages
caofangkun created STORM-924: Summary: Set the file mode of the files included when packaging release packages Key: STORM-924 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-924 Project: Apache Storm Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.11.0 Reporter: caofangkun Assignee: caofangkun Priority: Minor -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (STORM-924) Set the file mode of the files included when packaging release packages
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14611678#comment-14611678 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-924: -- GitHub user caofangkun opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/613 STORM-924:Set the file mode of the files included when packaging release packages You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/caofangkun/apache-storm storm-924 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/613.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #613 commit 5d26820167e83358efbb4c05a03976d9c7ea Author: caofangkun caofang...@gmail.com Date: 2015-05-25T03:27:01Z Merge pull request #22 from apache/master Merge from apache/storm to caofangkun/apache-storm commit 5122dea1216c9b6125e8fd5364f90236c84ae196 Author: caofangkun caofang...@gmail.com Date: 2015-06-01T06:30:22Z Merge pull request #23 from apache/master Merge from apache/storm to caofangkun/apache-storm commit 0f71a7db32b47208ff7373e8b1c75f9f5ebaf9b4 Author: caofangkun caofang...@gmail.com Date: 2015-06-12T03:34:44Z Merge pull request #24 from apache/master Merge from apache/storm to caofangkun/apache-storm commit 03d276069797cc993c7078f7ece513802960d40d Author: caofangkun caofang...@gmail.com Date: 2015-06-17T02:22:13Z Merge pull request #25 from apache/master Merge from apache/storm to caofangkun/apache-storm commit 469b7f56f910bc9f9b8d3af7670f86fbdb5c53ed Author: caofangkun caofang...@gmail.com Date: 2015-06-23T03:22:20Z Merge pull request #26 from apache/master Merge from apache/storm to caofangkun/apache-storm commit dddaacbf51d37f97e072df0eed4d14c09cdda453 Author: caofangkun caofang...@gmail.com Date: 2015-06-26T02:28:32Z Merge pull request #27 from apache/master Merge from apache/storm to caofangkun/apache-storm commit 874f5cf3312db33c2658c023f702c7f62916fbec Author: caofangkun caofang...@gmail.com Date: 2015-07-02T08:53:57Z STORM-924:Set the file mode of the files included when packaging the release packages Set the file mode of the files included when packaging release packages --- Key: STORM-924 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-924 Project: Apache Storm Issue Type: Improvement Affects Versions: 0.11.0 Reporter: caofangkun Assignee: caofangkun Priority: Minor -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[GitHub] storm pull request: add dotNet adapter.
Github user ziyunhx commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/612#issuecomment-117957706 the StormSimple.exe source is at https://github.com/ziyunhx/storm-net-adapter/tree/master/StormSimple. I can't find where it should be. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-924:Set the file mode of the files inclu...
Github user lazyval commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/613#issuecomment-118044177 :+1: For those who wonders what this octal numbers mean, there is a great [*humanizator*](http://permissions-calculator.org/decode/0644/). --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] storm pull request: add dotNet adapter.
Github user lazyval commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/612#issuecomment-118042465 Code aside, I guess storing *compiled* binaries and libraries in git isn't quite a good idea. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
Tick Tuple
HI, I have a topology where there are 10 instances of a spout connected to a bolt. I have set the tick tuple frequency of 1 sec. When i run the topology, i see that before the tick tuple starts, storm calls nexttuple function in all the spouts and the tuples are emitted. So i get a large number of tuples in the first second say 100,000 once the tick tuple starts , the next second i receive around 8000 tuples and averages around after that.. So my question is why storm calls nextuple in the spouts before starting the tick tuple?Is this a bug in storm?Can this be fixed? Thanks, Pradheep
[jira] [Commented] (STORM-919) Gathering worker and supervisor process information (CPU/Memory)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-919?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14612016#comment-14612016 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-919: -- Github user lazyval commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/608#issuecomment-118050871 It might be too late for this particular PR, but it makes sense to separate human changes and generated code into two separate commits. Otherwise it's really hard to review the code. Gathering worker and supervisor process information (CPU/Memory) Key: STORM-919 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-919 Project: Apache Storm Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Shyam Rajendran Assignee: Shyam Rajendran Priority: Minor It would be useful to have supervisor and worker process related information such as %cpu utilization, JVM memory and network bandwidth available to NIMBUS which would be useful for resource aware scheduler implementation later on. As a beginning, the information can be piggybacked on the existing heartbeats into the ZK or to the pacemaker as required. Related JIRAs STORM-177 STORM-891 STORM-899 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-919 Gathering worker and supervisor proc...
Github user lazyval commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/608#issuecomment-118050871 It might be too late for this particular PR, but it makes sense to separate human changes and generated code into two separate commits. Otherwise it's really hard to review the code. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] storm pull request: add dotNet adapter.
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/612#issuecomment-118058205 @ziyunhx Agreed to @lazyval. - Project setting files should be removed from repo, which includes PDB, etc. (Maybe csproj too?) - If we can make DLLs from source code, DLLs should be removed from repo. Btw, I wonder Storm community can maintain non-JVM .net codes (which is actually a project) within JVM project. It also adds/changes 1+ lines to storm-core, which is big compared to origin storm-core. Please note that multilang implementations in storm-core are simple enough to represent just one file. They don't require additional libraries installed, too. There're some advanced Storm multilang projects, for example, StreamParse(https://github.com/Parsely/streamparse). .Net multilang adapter could be better to be maintained like StreamParse, I mean, outer Storm project. It seems to be more natural. How about posting new feature to user / dev mailing list and gather a consensus that we would be better to include this? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] storm pull request: add dotNet adapter.
Github user ziyunhx closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/612 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
[GitHub] storm pull request: STORM-924:Set the file mode of the files inclu...
Github user HeartSaVioR commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/613#issuecomment-118211480 I like the change. It would be better to set files' mode explicitly whenever it needs. Only thing that I'm afraid of is unrelated commits, which are having no meaning for Apache Storm repo. Could you handle it? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket with INFRA. ---
