[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev 
   Date: 2004-09-15T00:13:03
   Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
   Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

   no comment

Change Log:

--
@@ -95,23 +95,22 @@
   }
 
   protected static String getMethodName(HttpServletRequest request) {
-String  command = null;
-String  buttonValue = null;
-Enumeration enum= request.getParameterNames();
-while(enum.hasMoreElements()) {
-  buttonValue = (String)enum.nextElement();
-  if(buttonValue.endsWith(".x")) {
-command = buttonValue.substring(0,buttonValue.indexOf('.'));
+String methodName  = null;
+String buttonValue = null;
+String parameter   = mapping.getParameter();
+
+if((parameter != null) && (parameter.endsWith(".x"))) {
+  methodName = parameter.substring(0,buttonValue.indexOf('.'));
+} else {
+  Enumeration enum = request.getParameterNames();
+  while(enum.hasMoreElements()) {
+buttonValue = (String)enum.nextElement();
+if(buttonValue.endsWith(".x")) {
+  methodName = buttonValue.substring(0,buttonValue.indexOf('.'));
+}
   }
 }
-
-if(methodName == null) {
-  String parameter = mapping.getParameter();
-  if(parameter.endsWith(".x")) {
-methodName = buttonValue.substring(0,buttonValue.indexOf('.'));
-  }
-}
-return command;
+return methodName;
   }
 
   protected Method getMethod(String name)
@@ -162,7 +161,7 @@
 
 '''So, just mine (retrieve, fetch) the value of the [name].x request parameter for a 
generic solution that covers links, form submits, images, and so on without requiring 
struts-config.xml use and providing auto method calling via reflection.  If you have 
further questions, or don't understand the last sentence, reread the beginning of this 
hurried presentation and ''see'' StrutsCatalogMultipleImageTagsSimplified .'''
 
-'''Please note that if you like configuring struts-config.xml and like 
MappingDispatchAction, SimpleDispatchAction does everything that class does and 
more.'''
+'''Please note that if you like configuring struts-config.xml and like 
!MappingDispatchAction, !SimpleDispatchAction does everything that class does and 
more.'''
 
 
 '''Michael !McGrady'''

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev 
   Date: 2004-09-15T00:31:12
   Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
   Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

   no comment

Change Log:

--
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
 String parameter   = mapping.getParameter();
 
 if((parameter != null) && (parameter.endsWith(".x"))) {
-  methodName = parameter.substring(0,buttonValue.indexOf('.'));
+  methodName = parameter.substring(0,parameter.indexOf('.'));
 } else {
   Enumeration enum = request.getParameterNames();
   while(enum.hasMoreElements()) {

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsConsultants

2004-09-15 Thread dev 
   Date: 2004-09-15T06:23:03
   Editor: BruceKissinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
   Page: StrutsConsultants
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsConsultants

   no comment

Change Log:

--
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
  *  Blue Moose Software, LLC -- http://www.blue-moose.net
  *  Brinkpoint Software -- http://www.brinkpoint.com
  *  Caimito Technologies -- http://www.caimito.net
- *  Calex Technologies, (Pacific Northwest) -- http://www.calextech.com
+ *  Calex Technologies, (Pacific Northwest) -- http://www.calextech.biz
  *  Chariot Solutions (based near Philadelphia) -- http://www.chariotsolutions.com/
  *  Chris Maeda, Freelancer -- http://cmaeda.com/
  *  Descriptor Systems (Iowa) -- http://www.descriptor.com

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31242] New: - Multipart request parameters lost when forwarding

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31242

Multipart request parameters lost when forwarding

   Summary: Multipart request parameters lost when forwarding
   Product: Struts
   Version: 1.1 Final
  Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
  Severity: Normal
  Priority: Other
 Component: Controller
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


This happens after an action has executed successfully , and we're forwarding to
a JSP page.

Specifically, the request parameters seem to vanish in the
RequestProcessor.doForward() method, when the multipart request gets unwrapped:

// Unwrap the multipart request, if there is one.
if (request instanceof MultipartRequestWrapper) {
request = ((MultipartRequestWrapper) request).getRequest();
}

This may be related to bug 26639.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Container- based security

2004-09-15 Thread jackie 
Hello Everyone,
   Can anyone help me to setup a container based security in Struts 
application.  I research that it involves using filter, then also the server 
authentication.
   Also a quote  from this site, written by Ted
Husted:
http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=471934
"Answer
You can use either container-based security or form-based security to 
authenticate users. With container-based security, the Web browser will 
track the logins for you, and "replay" the credentials to the server 
whenever they are required. If a browser hasn't been authenticated yet, it 
will automatically display a simple login form. If the login passes, the 
user's original request will proceed. This will also work properly if a user 
tried to POST from a form to an action URI in a protected area. Once the 
browser is authenticated, the POST proceeds normally. For applications that 
manage their own logins, it is probably easier to insist that every single 
page test for an authenticated user first, and redirect to the login page if 
not. The Struts example application does this -- partially by use of an 
application-specific custom tag (app:checkLogon) that performs this check at 
the top of every page. The tag is application-specific, because the notion 
of what constitutes a "logged on user" is application specific as well. "

   My project specs is, if the user is not login. then the user directly 
link to a certain page, then it automatically goes to a login page...

   I used the Struts Tags  but then It is not very reliable 
and very tasky to do, and I like also to seperate the View part from the 
Controller part.

   I find difficulty in setting out the filter... Also it is my first time 
to used an authentication Struts Web App.  I am not sure what is the right 
filter or what kind of authetication that is appropriate in my app.

   Thanks!  Anyhelp will be greatly appreciated!
Cheers,
jack 

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev 
   Date: 2004-09-15T07:13:52
   Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
   Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

   no comment

Change Log:

--
@@ -134,6 +134,14 @@
 log.error(message);
 throw new ServletException(message);
   }
+
+  protected ActionForward cancelled(ActionMapping mapping,
+ActionForm form,
+HttpServletRequest request,
+HttpServletResponse response)
+throws Exception {
+return null;
+  }
 }
 
 }}}

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31242] - Multipart request parameters lost when forwarding

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31242

Multipart request parameters lost when forwarding

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution||DUPLICATE



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-15 14:21 ---
This isn't a bug - its a known limitation of the fact that the current version 
of Struts complies with version 2.2 of the servlet specification. When we move 
Struts on to a minimum of version 2.3 of the servlet specification it will be 
resolved.

See bug 25434. Also discussions in Bug 17583 and Bug 28983 are related.

Niall




*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25434 ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25434] - multipart/form-data loses all request parameters in action forward.

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25434

multipart/form-data loses all request parameters in action forward.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-15 14:21 ---
*** Bug 31242 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev 
   Date: 2004-09-15T09:43:40
   Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
   Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

   no comment

Change Log:

--
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 '''Now, how do we know which image has been clicked or which command has been clicked 
and, additionally, have the methods automatically generated?  The answer has been 
complicated and costly in the past.  Here is a simple way to achieve everything at a 
low cost and with great flexibility and freedom.'''
 {{{
 public abstract class SimpleDispatchAction
-   extends Action {
+extends Action {
   protected   Classclazz= this.getClass();
   protected staticLog  log  = 
LogFactory.getLog(SimpleDispatchAction.class);
   protected staticMessageResources messages = 
MessageResources.getMessageResources ("org.apache.struts.actions.LocalStrings");

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Memory Leak in MappingDispatchAction?

2004-09-15 Thread Joe Germuska 
Wanted to run this by some folks:
Our largest Struts application has become a total memory hog.  This 
has led our system administrator to take a crash source in the 
under-development JBoss profiler.  We're not expert in reading the 
output of that, but it seems to point back to a lot of memory being 
used by the HashMap of dispatch methods kept by 
MappingDispatchAction.  If I've got my we have over 200 action 
mappings in this app, and I suspect that every one of them uses 
MappingDispatchAction.

Assuming for now that we are actually reading the profiler correctly, 
is there any reason why that map shouldn't just be made a 
WeakHashMap?  When it comes down to reflection, I don't really have a 
good idea of when Method objects would be created or going out of 
scope, but considering how casual Struts is about using reflection in 
general, how bad could it be to have an extra reflection call for 
those times when a Method gets garbage collected out of the 
WeakHashMap?

If anyone out there has more experience using the JBoss profiler, you 
might be able to coach us to better analysis.

Thanks in advance,
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  
http://blog.germuska.com
"In fact, when I die, if I don't hear 'A Love Supreme,' I'll turn 
back; I'll know I'm in the wrong place."
   - Carlos Santana

Discrepancy between 'Acquiring' and 'Download->Binaries'

2004-09-15 Thread Wendy Smoak 
[resending from a subscribed address]

Is this intentional?

Acquiring has 1.1 and 1.2.4 listed:
http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html

But if you go to Download->Binaries, it still has 1.2.2:
http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi

I'm guessing (from the .cgi extension) that the download page picks up the
contents of some directory and builds the page.

It's confusing one of the new users, is it possible to fix this without too
much effort, or will it have to wait for 1.2.4 to go GA?

Thanks,
-- 
Wendy Smoak


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev 
   Date: 2004-09-15T11:49:54
   Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
   Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

   no comment

Change Log:

--
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
   while(enum.hasMoreElements()) {
 buttonValue = (String)enum.nextElement();
 if(buttonValue.endsWith(".x")) {
-  methodName = buttonValue.substring(0,buttonValue.indexOf('.'));
+  methodName = buttonValue.substring(0,buttonValue.indexOf(".x"));
 }
   }
 }

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

2004-09-15 Thread dev 
   Date: 2004-09-15T11:53:55
   Editor: MichaelMcGrady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
   Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
   Page: StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsCatalogSimpleDispatchAction

   no comment

Change Log:

--
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@
 {{{
 
 
+
+or
+
+
+
 }}}
 
 '''or the equivalent, in the various Struts' image taglibs:'''

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31255] New: - say in which scope searched when "No bean found under attribute key" is issued

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31255

say in which scope searched when "No bean found under attribute key" is issued

   Summary: say in which scope searched when "No bean found under
attribute key" is issued
   Product: Struts
   Version: 1.1 Final
  Platform: Other
OS/Version: Other
Status: NEW
  Severity: Enhancement
  Priority: Other
 Component: Unknown
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


when having many tag references to a bean and one of them is tied to a wrong
scope, it would be very helpful to say which scopes where searched when this
happens. When the error message would name "session" where the bean was not
found and all the other references do not specify a scope, it is much easier to
know where the problem lies.

javax.servlet.ServletException: No bean found under attribute key oneLoper

org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.doHandlePageException(PageContextImpl.java:825)

org.apache.jasper.runtime.PageContextImpl.handlePageException(PageContextImpl.java:758)

org.apache.jsp.adminMoney_005fde_jsp._jspService(adminMoney_005fde_jsp.java:532)
org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:94)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:324)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:292)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:236)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)

root cause

javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: No bean found under attribute key oneLoper

org.apache.struts.taglib.logic.CompareTagBase.condition(CompareTagBase.java:221)
org.apache.struts.taglib.logic.EqualTag.condition(EqualTag.java:90)

org.apache.struts.taglib.logic.ConditionalTagBase.doStartTag(ConditionalTagBase.java:218)

org.apache.jsp.adminMoney_005fde_jsp._jspx_meth_logic_equal_0(adminMoney_005fde_jsp.java:2343)

org.apache.jsp.adminMoney_005fde_jsp._jspService(adminMoney_005fde_jsp.java:415)
org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:94)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:324)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:292)
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:236)
javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:802)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Discrepancy between 'Acquiring' and 'Download->Binaries'

2004-09-15 Thread Wendy S 
Is this intentional?

Acquiring has 1.1 and 1.2.4 listed:
http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html

But if you go to Download->Binaries, it still has 1.2.2:
http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi

I'm guessing (from the .cgi extension) that the download page picks up the
contents of some directory and builds the page.

It's confusing one of the new users, is it possible to fix this without too
much effort, or will it have to wait for 1.2.4 to go GA?

Thanks,
-- 
Wendy Smoak

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Container- based security

2004-09-15 Thread struts Dude 

You can try ServletFilter, http://www.securityfilter.org/, it's independent
of container security, no need
to touch server configuration file. And real easy to use.

Try use it in combination with assigning roles to action mapping from
struts-config.xml
and with Filter ( i.e. implements Filter ), then I doubt u will need
container security anymore.

There r also some good articles from www.javaworld.com about security in
Struts.




- Original Message - 
From: "jackie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 3:13 PM
Subject: Container- based security


> Hello Everyone,
>
> Can anyone help me to setup a container based security in Struts
> application.  I research that it involves using filter, then also the
server
> authentication.
> Also a quote  from this site, written by Ted
> Husted:
> http://www.jguru.com/faq/view.jsp?EID=471934
> "Answer
> You can use either container-based security or form-based security to
> authenticate users. With container-based security, the Web browser will
> track the logins for you, and "replay" the credentials to the server
> whenever they are required. If a browser hasn't been authenticated yet, it
> will automatically display a simple login form. If the login passes, the
> user's original request will proceed. This will also work properly if a
user
> tried to POST from a form to an action URI in a protected area. Once the
> browser is authenticated, the POST proceeds normally. For applications
that
> manage their own logins, it is probably easier to insist that every single
> page test for an authenticated user first, and redirect to the login page
if
> not. The Struts example application does this -- partially by use of an
> application-specific custom tag (app:checkLogon) that performs this check
at
> the top of every page. The tag is application-specific, because the notion
> of what constitutes a "logged on user" is application specific as well. "
>
> My project specs is, if the user is not login. then the user directly
> link to a certain page, then it automatically goes to a login page...
>
> I used the Struts Tags  but then It is not very
reliable
> and very tasky to do, and I like also to seperate the View part from the
> Controller part.
>
> I find difficulty in setting out the filter... Also it is my first
time
> to used an authentication Struts Web App.  I am not sure what is the right
> filter or what kind of authetication that is appropriate in my app.
>
> Thanks!  Anyhelp will be greatly appreciated!
>
> Cheers,
> jack
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Struts 1.2.4 Release

2004-09-15 Thread Niall Pemberton 
I'm happy with Struts 1.2.4 version Martin posted. I've installed it in an
existing webapp with no problems and the
examples/mailreader/tiles-documentation webapps seem to work.

Can we vote on releasing this version?

Niall



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[VOTE] Struts 1.2.4 Quality

2004-09-15 Thread Martin Cooper 
The Struts 1.2.4 test build has been available for a few days now. Once 
you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, 
please respond to the following vote.

-
Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.4 build should be classified as:
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
-
If you are voting for Alpha or Beta, please state your concerns with the 
build as it is today.

Only the votes of Struts PMC members are binding. However, all opinions 
and feedback are welcome.

--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.4 Quality

2004-09-15 Thread Niall Pemberton 
> The Struts 1.2.4 test build has been available for a few days now. Once 
> you have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, 
> please respond to the following vote.
> 
> -
> Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.4 build should be classified as:
> 
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X ] General Availability (GA)
> -
> 
> If you are voting for Alpha or Beta, please state your concerns with the 
> build as it is today.
> 
> Only the votes of Struts PMC members are binding. However, all opinions 
> and feedback are welcome.
> 
> --
> Martin Cooper



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Discrepancy between 'Acquiring' and 'Download->Binaries'

2004-09-15 Thread Martin Cooper 
It's not intentional. It's an accident of introducing our own download 
page and then backing out a GA release.

Fixing the download page to reference 1.1 would be a nuisance, since 1.1 
was a Jakarta release, and the download page is designed for Struts as a 
TLP.

Since the vote just went out for Struts 1.2.4 quality, and I'm hopeful 
that it will go GA, for real this time, I'd prefer to wait for the result 
of the vote (72 hours) before making any changes.

--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Wendy Smoak wrote:
[resending from a subscribed address]
Is this intentional?
Acquiring has 1.1 and 1.2.4 listed:
http://struts.apache.org/acquiring.html
But if you go to Download->Binaries, it still has 1.2.2:
http://struts.apache.org/download.cgi
I'm guessing (from the .cgi extension) that the download page picks up the
contents of some directory and builds the page.
It's confusing one of the new users, is it possible to fix this without too
much effort, or will it have to wait for 1.2.4 to go GA?
Thanks,
--
Wendy Smoak
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.4 Quality

2004-09-15 Thread Martin Cooper 
My own vote...
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Martin Cooper wrote:
The Struts 1.2.4 test build has been available for a few days now. Once you 
have had a chance to form an opinion on the quality of this build, please 
respond to the following vote.

-
Based on its quality, the Struts 1.2.4 build should be classified as:
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] General Availability (GA)
-
If you are voting for Alpha or Beta, please state your concerns with the 
build as it is today.

Only the votes of Struts PMC members are binding. However, all opinions and 
feedback are welcome.

--
Martin Cooper
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31255] - say in which scope searched when "No bean found under attribute key" is issued, which tag, which jsp line

2004-09-15 Thread bugzilla 
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31255

say in which scope searched when "No bean found under attribute key" is issued, which 
tag, which jsp line

[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|say in which scope searched |say in which scope searched
   |when "No bean found under   |when "No bean found under
   |attribute key" is issued|attribute key" is issued,
   ||which tag, which jsp line



--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-09-16 05:43 ---
complementary to the above suggested improved error message that tries to follow
the princple of saying WHAT happened WHY, the error message could also be
amended with some info about WHERE - i.e.: was it in a bean:write or logic:equal
tag, etc.?

so, ideally the error message would be
<>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]