[s1] Added Tiles 2 integration module
Hi all! I would like to know if I can add the Struts 1 - Tiles 2 integration module to struts-parent pom. This module is used inside Tiles' showcase, that is currently available only in its SVN repository, and it seems to work pretty well: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/examples/trunk/tiles-showcase/ Thank you Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s2] Enhancement to Zero Config: Default Success Result
On 2/28/07, mraible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One change I'd like to see to the codebehind plugin is the ability to specify the default location of pages. For example WEB-INF/pages. Or is that what the "struts.codebehind.defaultPackage" constant is for? I'd like to see that for all results. We often regurgitate the same path-prefix over and over and over, making the configuration harder to read. Perhaps "location-prefix" could be a global setting. -Ted. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s1] Added Tiles 2 integration module
For Struts 1, sure! We'd love to have it for 1.4 Antonio Petrelli wrote: Hi all! I would like to know if I can add the Struts 1 - Tiles 2 integration module to struts-parent pom. This module is used inside Tiles' showcase, that is currently available only in its SVN repository, and it seems to work pretty well: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tiles/examples/trunk/tiles-showcase/ Thank you Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.7 Quality
On 3/1/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We choose not to re-use a tag after a build has been released, where "released" means the PMC has voted on the build. But, if it's still a test-build, and it would be helpful to retag it for some reason, then "no harm, no foul". I've been known to reset a tag up to three times before calling a vote. This situation is nebulous, since there is a vote thread, but no actual votes :) I agree with what Ted - from a purely practical PoV the effort required to re-tag and rebuild a 1.3.7 version would be no different from creating a 1.3.8 version. So for me I think its less confusing to just roll 1.3.8 - but I don't have a strong opinion so would leave it down to the RM whose actually doing the work. Niall If a tag is reused, it's important to delete the old one first. * svn delete https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/struts1/tags/STRUTS_#_#_# -m "STR-### Removing first try at #.#.#." -Ted. On 2/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Jouravlev wrote: > > Paul, do you think that STR-3009 -- ActionRedirect from ForwardConfig > > not redirecting properly -- should be fixed for 1.3.7 to minimize the > > impact of 1.3.5 ActionRedirect behavior? > > > I believe once a release is tagged, it cannot be undone. There is a > ticket list for 1.3.8 which you can work on. If you believe the 1.3.5 > forwarding behavior is an issue, you can give your unbinding -1. What do > you think? > > Paul > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- HTH, Ted. * http://www.husted.com/struts/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.7 Quality
On 2/28/07, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 2/28/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Jouravlev wrote: > > Paul, do you think that STR-3009 -- ActionRedirect from ForwardConfig > > not redirecting properly -- should be fixed for 1.3.7 to minimize the > > impact of 1.3.5 ActionRedirect behavior? > > > I believe once a release is tagged, it cannot be undone. There is a > ticket list for 1.3.8 which you can work on. If you believe the 1.3.5 > forwarding behavior is an issue, you can give your unbinding -1. What do > you think? I don't really use this class. I wrote my own version before ActionRedirect was checked into the core lib. Not an issue for me. Its not something that would stop me voting 1.3.7 GA - so IMO its really down to you Paul. If you feel its important and have the energy to roll a 1.3.8 with this issue fixed then go for it. If not then lets carry on with the 1.3.7 vote. Niall Michael. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.7 Quality
+1 for GA quality Niall On 2/25/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The Struts 1.3.7 test build is now available. Release notes: * http://struts.apache.org/1.x/userGuide/release-notes.html Distribution: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.7/ Maven 2 staging repository: * http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/1.3.7/m2-staging-repository/ If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with a vote on its quality: [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) Everyone who has tested the build is invited to vote. Votes by PMC members are considered binding. A vote passes if there are at least three binding +1s and more +1s than -1s. Please remember that a *binding* +1 for GA implies that you intend to support the release by applying patches and responding to posts to the user and dev lists. The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours, longer upon request. Thank you, Paul Benedict - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dev@struts.apache.org
Hi I have a form with 2 radio buttons Yes and No. By default in Add mode i want to set to 'No'. I am doing this in my form bean and its fine. But when it comes to update page, how do i set back to the selected one based on my database value 'Yes' or 'No'. Tough it looks generic requirement, i am having little tough time. Thanks - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=68065&messageID=128786#128786 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.7 Quality
[ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [X ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) I cast my vote to fix ActionRedirect in 1.3.8: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-3009 Do any other Struts committers object? The complaint is that ActionRedirect does not enforce "redirect=true" in 1.3.5 (but was in 1.2.9), and I will be putting back that constraint for 1.3.8. The vote will end tonight. Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:
For the third time now, please ask your User questions on the User list, not the Dev list. -- Martin Cooper On 3/1/07, Dilep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I have a form with 2 radio buttons Yes and No. By default in Add mode i want to set to 'No'. I am doing this in my form bean and its fine. But when it comes to update page, how do i set back to the selected one based on my database value 'Yes' or 'No'. Tough it looks generic requirement, i am having little tough time. Thanks - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=68065&messageID=128786#128786 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:
Sorry about that.. i looked in to that and i did'nt find Struts User list. Do you mean Web Work users ?? Thanks - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=68065&messageID=128795#128795 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re:
http://struts.apache.org/mail.html -- Martin Cooper On 3/1/07, Dilep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry about that.. i looked in to that and i did'nt find Struts User list. Do you mean Web Work users ?? Thanks - Posted via Jive Forums http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=68065&messageID=128795#128795 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Migrating from 2.0.1 to 2.0.6
All, Is there a document somewhere which tells how to migrate from 2.0.1 version to 2.0.6. I tried migrating and I am running into issues with tiles.xml and dojo. If there is a consolidated list somewhere to look at it would be helpful. Else, I guess I will have to go with trial and error. Thanks, Shekhar
Re: Struts 1.4 & 2.1 sharing localization code
On 2/28/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2007/2/22, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What could be useful for Tiles is a single configurable entry-point > from which the current Locale should be taken. I don't know if Paul > means this. I think Niall cleared my doubt in the Tiles Developers list, letting me know about Paul's work: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2897 I noticed that it can be easily used also with Tiles, so now the question is: where does this code belong to? I don't think that putting it in Struts is a good idea, since it will create an unwanted dependency. But neither commons-resources nor commons-i18n seem to have a Locale resolving feature. Both of those places seem to be good to me, I really don't know why there are two projects for the same subject (correct me if I am wrong). Whatever the choice is, I am willing to collaborate. Commons resources never made it to a release and Commons i18n never made it out of the Sandbox. The reason for two projects (AFAIK) was they were created by different people. Commons Resources was code factored out of Struts 1. If you wanted to start something - any Apache committer can have access to the Commons Sandbox - I think you just have to ask. Niall Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.7 Quality
On 3/1/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [ ] Leave at test build [ ] Alpha [X ] Beta [ ] General Availability (GA) I cast my vote to fix ActionRedirect in 1.3.8: https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-3009 Do any other Struts committers object? The complaint is that ActionRedirect does not enforce "redirect=true" in 1.3.5 (but was in 1.2.9), and I will be putting back that constraint for 1.3.8. The vote will end tonight. (non-binding) +1 on Beta - though I'm really '+1 what Paul thinks as he's RM'. Is the aim to start a vote on 1.3.8 as soon as STR-3009 is ready? Hen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.7 Quality
Henri Yandell wrote: Is the aim to start a vote on 1.3.8 as soon as STR-3009 is ready? That's my plan. It's a one-liner to fix. I'll put up a 1.3.8 this weekend and call another vote. Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.3.7 Quality
On 3/1/07, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/1/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [ ] Leave at test build > [ ] Alpha > [X ] Beta > [ ] General Availability (GA) > > I cast my vote to fix ActionRedirect in 1.3.8: > https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-3009 > > Do any other Struts committers object? The complaint is that > ActionRedirect does not enforce "redirect=true" in 1.3.5 (but was in > 1.2.9), and I will be putting back that constraint for 1.3.8. > > The vote will end tonight. (non-binding) +1 on Beta Same here. Who knows when 1.4 will be rolled out, so the sooner this get fixed the better. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[s1] Taglib plugin problem
What is going on with the output of the taglib plugin? http://struts.apache.org/1.x/struts-taglib/tagreference.html#link All the HTML is verbatim and smashed together. Who can help? Paul - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [s1] Taglib plugin problem
2007/3/2, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: What is going on with the output of the taglib plugin? http://struts.apache.org/1.x/struts-taglib/tagreference.html#link All the HTML is verbatim and smashed together. Who can help? I think that the "tag reference" menu item should be removed, since it has been superseded by taglibdoc: http://struts.apache.org/1.x/struts-taglib/tlddoc/html/link.html In taglibdoc all HTML tags work correctly Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
